From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 27 20:00:26 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD29A1065674
	for <freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:00:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DAB8FC15
	for <freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:00:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2RK0QG7082629
	for <freebsd-x11@freefall.freebsd.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:00:26 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2RK0Q89082617;
	Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:00:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:00:26 GMT
Message-Id: <201203272000.q2RK0Q89082617@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org
From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/165820
X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:00:26 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/165820; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/165820
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:52:59 +0000

 Actually, there's no need to conditionalise PORTDOCS=* if we want to
 be really picky.
 
 Chris