Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Sep 2002 21:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: netns
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209222101300.32087-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <200209230355.g8N3tfl7048774@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, John Hay wrote:

> > > > > Why don't they use the netipx code? Surely netware use ipx.
> > > >
> > > > IPX is based on XNS.  It differs by one significant field.  The
> > > > SAP (Service Advertisement Protocol) in IPX comed directly from
> > > > XNS.
> > > 
> > > So you are agreeing with me that to use netns to do ipx when we
> > > have netipx does not make sense? :-)
> > > 
> > > > FWIW.
> > > 
> > > I know, a lot of my time went into netipx, which was derived from
> > > netns. I also did IPXrouted which does SAP too.
> > 
> > I was mostly agreeing with Julian, that if people are using it, it
> > shouldn't be orphaned because something moved out from under some
> > otherwise perfectly good code.  A lot of people used to do 802.3
> > vs. Ethernet II, as well, and they did it for compatability with
> > legacy systems... so whether it makes technical sense or not, it
> > might make business sense.  8-).
> 
> You can tell them it makes business sense to do a s/AF_NS/AF_IPX/g
> in their code and suddenly they will be able to do even more then
> before, for instance they will be able to do different frame types
> on the same wire and one different wires. The netns code can only
> do one frame type per box, which is a pain if you want to connect
> part 802.3 and part Ethernet II networks. Yes I know because we
> run it like that at work. As a bonus FreeBSD get to maintain one
> piece of code and not two pieces that do almost exactly the same
> thing. Bugs fixed in one place, enhancements made in one place.
> I'm sure it makes business sense. :-)

My original posting was in error..
One of the things I remembered as using XNS actually uses IPX.


> 
> John
> -- 
> John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0209222101300.32087-100000>