Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Apr 2000 11:23:04 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Andy Coates <andy@friends-tv.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Dual Processors
Message-ID:  <20000423112304.F4675@freebie.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <022f01bfacc5$f9d11ff0$0100a8c0@blade>
References:  <017701bfac70$2152eaa0$0100a8c0@blade> <20000423105631.E4675@freebie.lemis.com> <022f01bfacc5$f9d11ff0$0100a8c0@blade>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]

On Sunday, 23 April 2000 at  2:48:05 +0100, Andy Coates wrote:
> On  Sunday, April 23, 2000 2:26 AM, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> wrote:
>> On Saturday, 22 April 2000 at 16:33:34 +0100, Andy Coates wrote:
>>>
>>> I currently have a Abit BP6 motherboard with 2 celeron 466's. I'm
>>> not sure how to make FreeBSD make use of both these processors,
>>> can anyone give me a point in the right direction as to where I
>>> should be looking?
>>>
>>> I added SMP options in the kernel config, but I wasn't too sure
>>> what to use so I left the defaults in:
>
>>> # To make an SMP kernel, the next two are needed
>>> options   SMP     # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel
>>> options   APIC_IO     # Symmetric (APIC) I/O
>>> # Optionally these may need tweaked, (defaults shown):
>>> options   NCPU=2      # number of CPUs
>>> options   NBUS=4      # number of busses
>>> options   NAPIC=1     # number of IO APICs
>>> options   NINTR=24    # number of INTs
>>>
>>> Would that be okay? And how can I test that I am using both
>>> processors?  I tried running a CPU intensive program and the load
>>> average never went over 1, which I thought would reach 2 if 2
>>> processors were in use.
>>
>> If you run one CPU intensive program, it will run in one CPU.  You
>> need at least two to use both CPUs.  Take a look at dmesg.  You should
>> see:
>>
>>   SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
>
> Yep, its there. I did actually see that message on bootup, and first
> impression was that only #1 CPU had been started or something, and
> wondered where #2 was :-)

You don't have a #2.  #0 is what produced all the messages so far.

> Thanks for clearing it up.
>
> Now I rest in the knowledge my box is running at its fastest :-)

I've just installed a system with exactly the same motherboard/CPU
combination.  I'm quite impressed.

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000423112304.F4675>