From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 05:47:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223D116A400 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:47:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@solink.ru) Received: from ns.itam.nsc.ru (ns.itam.nsc.ru [194.226.179.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6F543D48 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:47:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@solink.ru) Received: from site.lan (itut.itam.nsc.ru [194.226.179.2]) by ns.itam.nsc.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2S5lrgF027626 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:47:54 +0700 Received: from bocha.solink.office ([192.168.66.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by site.lan (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2S5lmq7007134 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:47:48 +0700 From: Bachilo Dmitry Organization: SoLink To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:47:48 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20060328044432.152CD45047@ptavv.es.net> <4428CA90.7090501@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4428CA90.7090501@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603281247.49142.root@solink.ru> Subject: Re: nve0: device timeout (1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 05:47:57 -0000 =F7 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C9 =CF=D4 =F7=D4=CF=D2=CE=C9=CB 28 =ED=C1=D2= =D4 2006 12:33 Sergey Matveychuk =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC(a): > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I must apologize. This patch is from David G. Lawrence of Download > > Technologies. He posted Saturday in a thread titled "nve timeout (and > > down) regression?" > > Does nve(4) detect unplugging a network cable well with the patch? Patch, by the way, was rejected. I have edited if_nve.c by hands, just chan= ged=20 watchdog manually from 8 to 0 and recompiled the kernel. The problem is gon= e.=20 But I am accessing this pc using ssh now, so I can't check unplugging the=20 cable. I'll test this 6 hours later and report. Actually this is no difference for me, I never unplug the cable so it is li= ke=20 a solution for the most people i think. =2D-=20 =2D----------------------- =F3 =D5=D7=C1=D6=C5=CE=C9=C5=CD, =E2=C1=DE=C9=CC=CF =E4=CD=C9=D4=D2=C9=CA =F2=D5=CB=CF=D7=CF=C4=C9=D4=C5=CC=D8 =CF=D4=C4=C5=CC=C1 =D3=C9=D3=D4=C5=CD= =CE=CF=CA =C9=CE=D4=C5=C7=D2=C1=C3=C9=C9 =EF=EF=EF "=EB=CF=CD=D0=C1=CE=C9=D1 =F3=CF=EC=C9=CE=CB"