Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:04:53 +0100
From:      Uwe Laverenz <uwe@laverenz.de>
To:        questions@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nssswitch - anyone using nss_X ? nss/freebsd complete?
Message-ID:  <20051104110453.GC17199@laverenz.de>
In-Reply-To: <436A7DCC.3000306@wmptl.com>
References:  <436A7DCC.3000306@wmptl.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:14:52PM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:

> avail have I found any definitive answer as to if nssswitch works correctly 
> and completely under FreeBSD.

I use nss_ldap (and pam_ldap), it is supported since 5.1_RELEASE. At
this time only passwd and group can be used via nsswitch. It works
without problems.

> Personal interest being drawn from my own issues using, configuring, and 
> updating/compiling nss_ldap. Issues in the code, issues with making new 

I never tried to compile them on my own, I always use nss_ldap and pam_ldap
from the ports.

> Sparing one problem, current version from FreeBSD/ports/current seems to 
> work correctly, but problem is quite an issue and potential security risk - 

Do you have an URL about this security risk?

Uwe




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051104110453.GC17199>