From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 4 11:05:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1818816A426; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:05:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from natfrord.rzone.de (natfrord.rzone.de [81.169.145.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A346643D46; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:04:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from athena.laverenz.de (p5480EFDD.dip.t-dialin.net [84.128.239.221]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jA4B4tBR028177; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:04:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3B9E38C779; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:04:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17218-04; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:04:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id BDDD8E38C778; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:04:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:04:53 +0100 From: Uwe Laverenz To: questions@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20051104110453.GC17199@laverenz.de> Mail-Followup-To: questions@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org References: <436A7DCC.3000306@wmptl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436A7DCC.3000306@wmptl.com> Organization: private site Sender: uwe@laverenz.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at laverenz.de Cc: Subject: Re: nssswitch - anyone using nss_X ? nss/freebsd complete? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 11:05:06 -0000 On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:14:52PM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote: > avail have I found any definitive answer as to if nssswitch works correctly > and completely under FreeBSD. I use nss_ldap (and pam_ldap), it is supported since 5.1_RELEASE. At this time only passwd and group can be used via nsswitch. It works without problems. > Personal interest being drawn from my own issues using, configuring, and > updating/compiling nss_ldap. Issues in the code, issues with making new I never tried to compile them on my own, I always use nss_ldap and pam_ldap from the ports. > Sparing one problem, current version from FreeBSD/ports/current seems to > work correctly, but problem is quite an issue and potential security risk - Do you have an URL about this security risk? Uwe