Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:23:50 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 Message-ID: <20041105222350.GA43977@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200411052316.53025.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041105215220.GA32961@xor.obsecurity.org> <7CBFDBE9-2F75-11D9-8D06-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <200411052316.53025.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 11:16:51PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday, 5. November 2004 22:56, Michael Johnson wrote: > > On Nov 5, 2004, at 4:52 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > > Same as on 6.x - the bugs are in the ports themselves. Don't do it if > > > you want your ports to work correctly. > > > > Is there a list of what's broke with -O2 in ports anywhere? >=20 > It's kinda hard to come up with one based on compiler warnings & paranoia= . :) It might be hard to come up with a definitive list of problems, but the fact that there are bugs in many ports that are manifested when they are compiled with -O2 is undeniable. Kris --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBi/12Wry0BWjoQKURAhneAJ4wQF0eL4IuE5cEEGTQd8wouSNANACfe1BB r3gPAE3UeP7PswO4H91Gepg= =eCZw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041105222350.GA43977>