From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 4 22:25:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D8E16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:25:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B291443D2F for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 22:25:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:25:08 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 60EE55D08; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 15:25:07 -0700 (PDT) To: n0g0013 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 04 Jul 2004 21:23:09 BST." <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-1531293084P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:25:07 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20040704222507.60EE55D08@ptavv.es.net> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 22:25:09 -0000 --==_Exmh_-1531293084P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:23:09 +0100 > From: n0g0013 > Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > On 02.07-19:31, Brad Knowles wrote: > [ ... ] > > Yup. PGP sign everything, and make sure that your keys don't > > ever get stolen or compromised. That makes it much harder for > > someone to successfully impersonate you. > > what is the story with PGP signatures these days? last i > investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant > to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use). > > does anyone use that format or is it all inline now? mutt > won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently > won't verify the content). mutt need to be fixed. I use exmh which generates multipart MIME PGP and works fine dealing with either single part or multipart PGP signed messages. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 --==_Exmh_-1531293084P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFA6IPCkn3rs5h7N1ERAnROAKCXW9lPJ1yUJASLhnwsdsTXVL1J9wCfewrt ebhFfJ59rY5mManig3FL76c= =6CvQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1531293084P--