From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 15:57:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4B6106564A for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lordcow@lordcow.org) Received: from lordcow.org (lordcow.org [41.203.5.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910CD8FC1B for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lordcow.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lordcow.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8FFUVZP085390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:30:31 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from lordcow@lordcow.org) Received: (from lordcow@localhost) by lordcow.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8FFUNOr085388; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:30:23 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from lordcow) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:30:23 +0200 From: Gareth de Vaux To: Ian Smith Message-ID: <20100915153023.GA84975@lordcow.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ian Smith , Brandon Gooch , ipfw@freebsd.org References: <20100909131733.GA21535@lordcow.org> <20100915134357.A73353@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100915134357.A73353@sola.nimnet.asn.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lordcow.org Cc: Brandon Gooch , ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: phantom rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:57:06 -0000 On Wed 2010-09-15 (14:39), Ian Smith wrote: > Indeed, that's where these have come from (and Gareth, you DO want those > rules, including the ipv6_mandatory ones if running ipv6) I don't, because I run my own from my own file. (I'm not using ipv6 either). > but I suspect that you may have rather intended this to be: > > firewall_script="/usr/local/etc/firewall" Nope I intended it as before - firewall_type="", and my file is in the format you mention later, and it works, just preceded with that stuff I didn't ask for. The first line in /usr/local/etc/firewall for example is: add pass all from any to any via lo0 so I end up with 2 of these rules, plus that other stuff. So are there some variables I can set that disable this second-guessing behaviour?