Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 02:07:40 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade of file(1) to 4.10 (including FreeBSD elf(5) fixes) Message-ID: <20040809090740.GB31766@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <4DA0F154-E57B-11D8-9C56-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040803170201.GA87300@dragon.nuxi.com> <4DA0F154-E57B-11D8-9C56-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > As usual, file(1) has to follow. Anyway, since it works for now, and > currently there is no reason to break it, why is it bad? I actually like > that feature, and it is useful for debugging ports that should have been > recompiled after a system upgrade. Sounds like you're trying to work around bugs in the Ports Collection, please go fix those bugs and use the proper tool for the job. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040809090740.GB31766>