Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:10:21 +0800 From: Jiawei Ye <leafy7382@gmail.com> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Cc: Christian Laursen <xi@borderworlds.dk>, FreeBSD - Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: perl-after-upgrade does not process anything Message-ID: <c21e92e205062807102ab177b6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42C15820.2030904@xbsd.org> References: <c21e92e2050627183623236331@mail.gmail.com> <42C14EAB.4020902@protey.ru> <86fyv2fush.fsf@borg.borderworlds.dk> <42C15820.2030904@xbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/28/05, Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> wrote:
> The idea is "don't use portupgrade -a". Sure "portupgrade
> perl5.8" does the trick.
>=20
> --
> Florent Thoumie
> flz@xbsd.org
Why? 'portupgrade -a' does not fix the perl dependancy, which is why
we need the script in UPDATING in the first place, ie. no
perl-depending port will be re-installed by portupgrade -a. According
to the manpage, perl-after-upgrade is supposed to do what the script
did, no?
Jiawei
--=20
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e205062807102ab177b6>