From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  2 20:01:24 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAE016A412
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  2 Oct 2006 20:01:24 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org)
Received: from cvs.openbsd.org (cvs.openbsd.org [199.185.137.3])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F0443E6F
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  2 Oct 2006 20:00:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org)
Received: from cvs.openbsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cvs.openbsd.org (8.13.6/8.12.1) with ESMTP id k92K0B5P009759
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:00:11 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200610022000.k92K0B5P009759@cvs.openbsd.org>
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:24:45 GMT."
	<200609302024.k8UKOjhj073306@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:00:11 -0600
From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:16:07 +0000
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-06:22.openssh 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:01:24 -0000

> The OpenSSH project believe that the race condition can lead to a Denial
> of Service or potentially remote code execution

                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Bullshit.  Where did anyone say this?

Why don't you put people in charge who can READ CODE, and SEE THAT
THIS IS ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT.