From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 21 17:35:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02ECB1065715; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from megatron.madpilot.net (megatron.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A665A8FC08; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: by megatron.madpilot.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2CB1F130C41; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:35:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:35:48 +0100 From: Guido Falsi To: Rick Chisholm Message-ID: <20090121173548.GA91761@megatron.madpilot.net> References: <49763159.2070901@parallel42.ca> <497638D3.1000908@madpilot.net> <4976BC15.3080209@FreeBSD.org> <20090121121915.GA89663@megatron.madpilot.net> <49773E9B.40802@parallel42.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49773E9B.40802@parallel42.ca> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: squidGuard-1.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:35:50 -0000 On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:26:19AM -0500, Rick Chisholm wrote: >> I agree. I was thinking if it could be acceptable to add an option to >> the port for installing/not installing the sample blacklists and not >> adding those to the plist anyway. This could be easier to handle. >> Perhaps also more logical. >> >> With this change a note on deinstall to check and remove by hand the >> folder should also be added, obviously. >> >> > That might make more sense, esp. if a user has created numerous large > dbs rather than downloading them from a 3rd party. It wasn't disastrous > for me since I upgraded a test server first, but it would be preferable > if the upgrade didn't touch the db dir or squidGuard.conf. As I said that was behaviour already present in the port logic. I will make some experiments in this direction and modify the port as needed. Only doubt I have is, how will tinderboxes react to this kind of implementation? -- Guido Falsi