From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 25 19:14:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C3016A41F for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:14:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C79E43D5C for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:14:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so1005388nzo for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:14:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fDgtMO+Envz/bvYGhd17n5ZbTjGcFQWrue6PE/7gG40IHv5Re+53+1BA5QS3dAqpwzipJAiqXVMdh7BQompok98vpMtJGWrimxcv1PNyit4EmD0T3pAJWO/7DXHRdVP618Kgtanxy4ER8mCmzzLdkiz/q9m74tXwnV3j18juLJE= Received: by 10.65.22.18 with SMTP id z18mr1323979qbi; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:14:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.210.8 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:14:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2a41acea0512251114u6cdbb439j3cb6e3ec07f97189@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:14:38 -0800 From: Jack Vogel To: Danny Braniss In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <2a41acea0512220941y61c9b5acs8053e6df8a96a1e4@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em bad performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:14:40 -0000 On 12/22/05, Danny Braniss wrote: > iperf -c host > > i'm begining to believe that the problem is elsewhere, i just put in > an ethernet nic in a PCI-X/Express slot, and the performance is similar, = bad. > > danny Hmm, not some silly like getting set to half duplex? :) Jack