Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 23:57:18 +0200 From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch(1) depends on RCS - should it? Message-ID: <20131009215718.GA26158@britannica.bec.de> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgni6kw6qtLMwWQdc2SuQp%2BWa5-pTQwgSbTPa1-x_vznEA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgni6kw6qtLMwWQdc2SuQp%2BWa5-pTQwgSbTPa1-x_vznEA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 04:17:03PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > patch(1) explicitly tries to use RCS (and SCCS) in certain cases. At the SCCS behavior is part of (the SCCS option in ) POSIX 2008. So far I haven't seen any reason for messing with it. Joerg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131009215718.GA26158>