From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 00:03:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53EE16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:03:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4595E43D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:03:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@HiWAAY.net) Received: (qmail 11283 invoked by uid 0); 2 Jan 2005 00:08:09 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO ?10.0.0.68?) (69.73.60.132) by smtp8.knology.net with SMTP; 2 Jan 2005 00:08:09 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20050101220323.GA1119@procyon.nekulturny.org> References: <20050101220323.GA1119@procyon.nekulturny.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Kelly Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 18:03:10 -0600 To: FreeBSD_Questions FreeBSD_Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Re: courier-imap installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:03:17 -0000 On Jan 1, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Danny MacMillan wrote: >> configured properly when it was prepared as a port. I would just > > It was installed properly, but quite a few ports require some post- > install configuration, especially on the server side. Somebody should have mentioned this by now: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200308/courier-imap.html I don't fully understand it but found instructions somewhere in the courier-imap package to add this line to /etc/rc.conf: courier_imap_imapd_enable=YES In short I did and it does. Now what I'd like to do is cure these messages flooding /var/log/maillog: Jan 1 17:52:14 Opus imapd: Error: Input/output error Jan 1 17:52:14 Opus imapd: Check for proper operation and configuration Jan 1 17:52:14 Opus imapd: of the File Access Monitor daemon (famd). Saw where fam (thats what its called on FreeBSD) likes/needs inetd running and an entry in /etc/inetd.conf. Everything else runs OK w/o inetd so I'd like to continue to do without. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 00:18:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2F316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:18:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2359143D48 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:18:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-66-41-157-209.mn.client2.attbi.com [66.41.157.209]) (authenticated bits=0)j020In5v083422; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 18:18:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: <20050101085949.GA8592@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> References: <1104560438.7534.27.camel@owl2> <20050101085949.GA8592@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--383614089" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 18:18:41 -0600 To: Erik Trulsson X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: Sergei Gnezdov cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: News from several NNTP Servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:18:49 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1--383614089 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Jan 1, 2005, at 2:59 AM, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > There are two different ways of getting news from upstream. The first > is to have them send everything to you. This requires some kind of > agreement with the upstream-server. > The other is to pull articles one by one from the upstream just like a > normal nntp-client. > Most nntp-servers can be configured to pull data from upstream just as > if it was a client which means that you do not need any sort of special > agreement with upstream. Where can I go to find upstream newsfeeds? I'm working on setting up a local news server and I want to obtain a few specific blocks of newsgroups for local users. I don't know what they're going to want to access at this point, but I think you get the idea. Thanks. _______________________________________________________ Eric F Crist "I am so smart, S.M.R.T!" Secure Computing Networks -Homer J Simpson --Apple-Mail-1--383614089 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkHXPeEACgkQRAAY9knOW+rCJQCfZtRlg32Ynq6RmTMugY89B0lK DGcAn2+soRKUtWJ7PjxxXn/GpHFcb+6b =rgqW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-1--383614089-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 00:55:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A489716A4E8 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:55:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from knife.dreamhost.com (knife.dreamhost.com [66.33.219.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF0143D2D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:55:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.103] (user-33qt994.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.165.36]) by knife.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5626E4F49 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 16:55:45 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <06ECC87A-5C59-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Timothy Luoma Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 19:55:42 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: CUPS with ghostscript-afpl-nox11-8.50,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:55:50 -0000 I'm trying to install /usr/ports/print/cups on 5.3 with ghostscript-afpl-nox11-8.50,1 $ /usr/ports/print/cups $ make WITH_GHOSTSCRIPT_AFPL=yes install distclean but that doesn't work, it still tries to install ghostscript-gnu ===> Installing for ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_11 ===> ghostscript-gnu-nox11-7.07_11 conflicts with installed package(s): ghostscript-afpl-nox11-8.50,1 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). I also tried 'make GHOSTSCRIPT_PORT=print/ghostscript-afpl-nox11 install distclean' Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 01:05:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A5B16A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:05:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5989F43D31 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.177]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACB5102FA for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.35]) [66.133.131.177]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12312-37-10 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (67-137-45-225.dsl2.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [67.137.45.225]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CC2102F6 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.25] (lugalong.mykitchentable.net [192.168.1.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7F93BF390 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 17:05:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41D748F0.1000303@mykitchentable.net> Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 17:05:52 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Subject: How To Make Vinum Keep Config Across Reboots? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:05:58 -0000 Since an upgrade from 4.9 to 4.10, I've had problems with vinum. The basic problem is that upon reboot, two of my vinum drives show up as "referenced" and thus create the associated chaos. I've tried many things and fiddled around quite a bit so I can't say exactly what I've done. I can include all of the entries in the history file since Oct. 31 if that's a help but it would be a long list. So prior to digging that deep, I will describe where I stand currently and where I want to finish. Currently, I have one vinum volume that I use for /usr. Fortunately this volume is up and running or I would really be in a mess. Here's the 'vinum list' output in this state: blacklamb# vinum vinum -> list 2 drives: D disk1 State: up Device /dev/da0s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D disk2 State: up Device /dev/da1s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) 1 volumes: V usr State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 16 GB 1 plexes: P usr.p0 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 16 GB 2 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 8383 MB S usr.p0.s1 State: up PO: 256 kB Size: 8383 MB I want to add another volume and mount it on /ftp. After creating the volume, vinum sees it and it appears OK as indicated in this output: vinum -> list 5 drives: D disk1 State: up Device /dev/da0s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D disk2 State: up Device /dev/da1s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D ftp1 State: up Device /dev/ad0s1h Avail: 0/76319 MB (0%) D ftp2 State: up Device /dev/ad1s1h Avail: 0/76319 MB (0%) D ftp3 State: up Device /dev/da3s1h Avail: 0/114473 MB (0%) 2 volumes: V usr State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 16 GB V ftp State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 260 GB 2 plexes: P usr.p0 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 16 GB P ftp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 3 Size: 260 GB 5 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 8383 MB S usr.p0.s1 State: up PO: 256 kB Size: 8383 MB S ftp.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 74 GB S ftp.p0.s1 State: up PO: 74 GB Size: 74 GB S ftp.p0.s2 State: up PO: 149 GB Size: 111 GB Next I 'quit' the vinum command line and fsck my newly created volume. It finishes successfully and I mount it: blacklamb# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 302350 102088 176074 37% / /dev/vinum/usr 16639674 5433762 9874739 35% /usr procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc /dev/vinum/ftp 265119539 119729707 132133856 48% /ftp I recheck with the 'vinum list' command and the output is the same as above. Now I cross my fingers and reboot to see if the volume comes up properly on startup. However ftp3 (/dev/da3s1h) comes up 'referenced' and causes problems. Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a dumpon: crash dumps to /dev/da1s1b (13, 131081) vinum: loaded vinum: reading configuration from /dev/ad1s1h vinum: ftp.p0.s2 is crashed vinum: ftp.p0 is corrupt vinum: updating configuration from /dev/ad0s1h vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da1s1h vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da0s1h vinum: /dev is mounted read-only, not rebuilding /dev/vinum Warning: defective objects D ftp3 State: referenced Device Avail: 0/0 MB P ftp.p0 C State: corrupt Subdisks: 3 Size: 260 GB S ftp.p0.s2 State: crashed PO: 149 GB Size: 111 GB swapon: adding /dev/da1s1b as swap device Automatic boot in progress... /dev/da0s1a: FILESYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/da0s1a: clean, 100130 free (938 frags, 12399 blocks, 0.6% fragmentation) /dev/vinum/ftp: CANNOT READ: BLK 546979872 /dev/vinum/ftp: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. /dev/vinum/ftp: CANNOT WRITE: BLK 2800 /dev/vinum/ftp: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. /dev/vinum/usr: FILESYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/vinum/usr: clean, 11205903 free (152463 frags, 1381680 blocks, 0.9% fragmentation) THE FOLLOWING FILE SYSTEM HAD AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: /dev/vinum/ftp (/ftp) File system preen failed, trying fsck -y . . . ** /dev/da0s1a ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 2053 files, 51045 used, 100130 free (938 frags, 12399 blocks, 0.6% fragmentation) ** /dev/vinum/usr ** Last Mounted on /usr ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 401072 files, 5433771 used, 11205903 free (152463 frags, 1381680 blocks, 0.9% fragmentation) ** /dev/vinum/ftp CANNOT READ: BLK 546979872 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY CONTINUE? yes THE FOLLOWING DISK SECTORS COULD NOT BE READ: 546979872, 546979873, 546979874, 546979875, /dev/vinum/ftp: CANNOT FIGURE OUT FILE SYSTEM PARTITION UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY WARNING: R/W mount of /ftp denied. Filesystem is not clean - run fsck mount: /dev/vinum/ftp: Operation not permitted Mounting /etc/fstab filesystems failed, startup aborted Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh: I enter the shell and run 'vinum list': vinum -> list 4 drives: D ftp1 State: up Device /dev/ad0s1h Avail: 0/76319 MB (0%) D ftp2 State: up Device /dev/ad1s1h Avail: 0/76319 MB (0%) D disk1 State: up Device /dev/da0s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D disk2 State: up Device /dev/da1s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D ftp3 State: referenced Device Avail: 0/0 MB 2 volumes: V usr State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 16 GB V ftp State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 260 GB 2 plexes: P usr.p0 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 16 GB P ftp.p0 C State: corrupt Subdisks: 3 Size: 260 GB 5 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 8383 MB S usr.p0.s1 State: up PO: 256 kB Size: 8383 MB S ftp.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 74 GB S ftp.p0.s1 State: up PO: 74 GB Size: 74 GB S ftp.p0.s2 State: crashed PO: 149 GB Size: 111 GB Now I delete all references to the ftp volume by running these commands: vinum -> rm -f ftp.p0.s2 vinum: removing ftp.p0.s2 Correcting length of ftp.p0: was 547043829, is 312602446 vinum: ftp.p0 is up vinum -> rm -f ftp.p0.s1 vinum: removing ftp.p0.s1 Correcting length of ftp.p0: was 312602446, is 156301223 vinum -> rm -f ftp.p0.s0 vinum: removing ftp.p0.s0 vinum -> rm -f ftp.p0 vinum: removing ftp.p0 vinum: ftp is down vinum -> rm -f ftp vinum: removing ftp vinum -> rm -f ftp3 vinum -> rm -f ftp2 vinum -> rm -f ftp1 Yet the 'reference to ftp3 remains. vinum -> list 1 drives: D disk1 State: up Device /dev/da0s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D disk2 State: up Device /dev/da1s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D ftp3 State: referenced Device Avail: 0/0 MB 1 volumes: V usr State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 16 GB 1 plexes: P usr.p0 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 16 GB 2 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 8383 MB S usr.p0.s1 State: up PO: 256 kB Size: 8383 MB Why does the list output show "1 drives:" when there are three listed and two working? Anyway, I've been here before and I quit vinum. Then I issue these commands: # df Filesystem 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 604700 204180 352144 37% / /dev/vinum/usr 33279348 10867544 19749458 35% /usr procfs 8 8 0 100% /proc # umount /usr # vinum stop vinum: unloaded vinum unloaded # vinum start vinum: loaded vinum: reading configuration from /dev/da1s1h vinum: updating configuration from /dev/da0s1h Then I issue a 'vinum list' and all seems well. # vinum vinum -> list 2 drives: D disk1 State: up Device /dev/da0s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D disk2 State: up Device /dev/da1s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) 1 volumes: V usr State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 16 GB 1 plexes: P usr.p0 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 16 GB 2 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 8383 MB S usr.p0.s1 State: up PO: 256 kB Size: 8383 MB vinum -> Since everything appears correct, this seems like a good place to do 'vinum saveconfig'. Next I edit /etc/fstab so only /ftp is not mounted and reboot. The system reboots fine and the 'vinum list' is as it is immediately above. Running in full production mode, I create the ftp volume again: vinum -> create -f vinum_ftp.conf Dec 24 16:37:45 blacklamb /kernel: vinum: drive ftp1 is up Dec 24 16:37:45 blacklamb /kernel: vinum: drive ftp2 is up Dec 24 16:37:45 blacklamb /kernel: vinum: drive ftp3 is up 5 drives: D disk1 State: up Device /dev/da0s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D disk2 State: up Device /dev/da1s1h Avail: 0/8383 MB (0%) D ftp1 State: up Device /dev/ad0s1h Avail: 0/76319 MB (0%) D ftp2 State: up Device /dev/ad1s1h Avail: 0/76319 MB (0%) D ftp3 State: up Device /dev/da3s1h Avail: 0/114473 MB (0%) 2 volumes: V usr State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 16 GB V ftp State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 260 GB 2 plexes: P usr.p0 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 16 GB P ftp.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 3 Size: 260 GB 5 subdisks: S usr.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 8383 MB S usr.p0.s1 State: up PO: 256 kB Size: 8383 MB S ftp.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 74 GB S ftp.p0.s1 State: up PO: 74 GB Size: 74 GB S ftp.p0.s2 State: up PO: 149 GB Size: 111 GB Dec 24 16:37:45 blacklamb /kernel: vinum: ftp.p0.s0 is up Dec 24 16:37:45 blacklamb /kernel: vinum: ftp.p0.s1 is up Dec 24 16:37:45 blacklamb /kernel: vinum: ftp.p0.s2 is up Dec 24 16:37:45 blacklamb /kernel: vinum: ftp.p0 is up Dec 24 16:37:45 blacklamb /kernel: vinum: ftp is up After running fsck, I can mount and access the volume. The system continues to run fine until the next reboot where the same problems start all over again. I also have the same problem with another volume I wish to run called "backup". How can I fix my vinum volumes so they survive reboots? Thanks for your help and Happy Holidays! Drew -- Visit The Alchemist's Warehouse Magic Tricks, DVDs, Videos, Books, & More! http://www.alchemistswarehouse.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 02:51:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57BD16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 02:51:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6974043D41 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 02:51:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A013560EA for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 20:51:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31725-08 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 20:51:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5E360E7 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 20:51:39 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <41D761CF.6060902@makeworld.com> Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 20:51:59 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050101) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.0 (20041102) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Subject: gdbm to text X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 02:51:42 -0000 Is there a utility that will read all records from a gdbm database and dump em to an editable file (text format)? -- Best regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 04:24:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F05316A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 04:24:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E26543D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 04:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j024OZj11239; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 20:24:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Eric F Crist" , "Erik Trulsson" Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 20:24:35 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal cc: Sergei Gnezdov cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: RE: News from several NNTP Servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 04:24:48 -0000 search google for keywork "open nntp server list" Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Eric F Crist > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 4:19 PM > To: Erik Trulsson > Cc: Sergei Gnezdov; FreeBSD-Questions > Subject: Re: News from several NNTP Servers > > > On Jan 1, 2005, at 2:59 AM, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > > There are two different ways of getting news from upstream. The first > > is to have them send everything to you. This requires some kind of > > agreement with the upstream-server. > > The other is to pull articles one by one from the upstream just like a > > normal nntp-client. > > Most nntp-servers can be configured to pull data from upstream just as > > if it was a client which means that you do not need any sort of special > > agreement with upstream. > > Where can I go to find upstream newsfeeds? I'm working on setting up a > local news server and I want to obtain a few specific blocks of > newsgroups for local users. I don't know what they're going to want to > access at this point, but I think you get the idea. > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________________ > Eric F Crist "I am so smart, S.M.R.T!" > Secure Computing Networks -Homer J Simpson > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 04:39:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B49D16A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 04:39:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from knife.dreamhost.com (knife.dreamhost.com [66.33.219.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F38D43D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 04:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.103] (dialup-4.252.226.253.Dial1.Cincinnati1.Level3.net [4.252.226.253]) by knife.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B941E4677 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 20:39:15 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3D374C4E-5C78-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Timothy Luoma Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:39:07 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: No MAKEDEV in /dev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 04:39:16 -0000 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ppp- troubleshoot.html tells me to use this command from /dev/: sh MAKEDEV cuaa0 cuaa1 cuaa2 cuaa3 but there is no MAKEDEV in /dev/ In fact, these are the only references to MAKEDEV on the entire machine: $ locate MAKEDEV /usr/ports/emulators/svr4_base/files/SVR4_MAKEDEV /usr/ports/net/rboot/files/patch-dev::MAKEDEV /usr/share/man/man8/MAKEDEV.8.gz /usr/src/share/man/man8/MAKEDEV.8 This seems fairly odd to me. How I can acquire MAKEDEV for this system (FreeBSD 5.3/Intel)? Thanks! TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 04:47:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EB216A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 04:47:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lp1001.snu.ac.kr (lp1001.snu.ac.kr [147.46.70.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B600A43D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 04:47:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by lp1001.snu.ac.kr (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j024ieEP013671; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:44:40 +0900 Message-ID: <41D77CC0.4090800@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:46:56 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD , lists@tntluoma.com References: <3D374C4E-5C78-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> In-Reply-To: <3D374C4E-5C78-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: No MAKEDEV in /dev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 04:47:02 -0000 Timothy Luoma wrote: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ppp- > troubleshoot.html tells me to use this command from /dev/: > > sh MAKEDEV cuaa0 cuaa1 cuaa2 cuaa3 > > but there is no MAKEDEV in /dev/ > Usually there are two entries for this in the documentation, one for 4.X and another for 5.X systems. On 5.3, see 'man MAKEDEV' and 'man devfs', and find out that MAKEDEV is deprecated by devfs. Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 05:08:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E32616A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:08:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A582443D46 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:08:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so53638rne for ; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:08:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=FCsNzU+n+icvuWQIC0wNMIIay407pZjl2LOFTP3mBSpcqkMrHwv0sMXS+aNvr/hnvycfFSTnTSPgi+wRs5HFLRqYbNaaPPoYcasV/LDKAjnrMSJO3kEZCMR8zJLNC+ZqIHFH8wqXVVO+RCId4DKIKLKo9gj1TXFtpyxB/JNW3UY= Received: by 10.38.92.78 with SMTP id p78mr205147rnb; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 21:08:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.101.3 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 21:08:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:08:28 -0600 From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: Joe Schmoe In-Reply-To: <20041226014550.45577.qmail@web53308.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041226014550.45577.qmail@web53308.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: triple monitor hardware setup on FBSD - suggestions needed... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eric Kjeldergaard List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 05:08:29 -0000 > I am currently running a triple-monitor setup under > winXP, with an extended desktop that stretches across > all three monitors. I like it. > > I would, however, like to use FreeBSD. Good choice :) > So, first off, what hardware (video card) comes to > mind for doing triple screens with FreeBSD ? A matrox > P750 comes to mind, but when you run it with three > screens, they downgrade to 1280x1024, which is bad. I > am happy to consider multiple video cards to > accomplish this ... at the very least I need 1600x1200 > out of each card, preferably 1920x1200 ... Well, as far as hardware goes for my tri-monitor, I usually have a Radeon 7500 and an geforce2 mx400 (or some other cruddy pci card) though I'm using a matrox G450 for the primary right now. Really, any combination of supported video cards will work about equally well. > Second, what is the support for something like this in > XFree86, or x.org ? What I am really looking for is > the ability to create virtually sized screens - so > instead of having three total (physical) screens that > I can maximize windows inside of, I want to split each > physical screen in half for a total of 6 virtual > screens - so there are six total areas within which I > can maximize a window in ... this is something I am > really trying to accomplish. I'd like to say that this is a trivial thing to do, but I kind of doubt that it is. I know of no easy way to do this because X as it is now, assigns a "head" to a screen (where by head I mean a video card output) and in doing so, makes the "head" atomic in a sense. What it sounds like you'd like to do is create something smaller than this and assign it to a screen. It might be substantially easier to just purchase more monitors or learn to use virtual desktops. Good luck finding something that suits you :) -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 05:10:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3B916A4CE; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:10:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from knife.dreamhost.com (knife.dreamhost.com [66.33.219.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB5143D39; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:10:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.103] (dialup-4.252.226.253.Dial1.Cincinnati1.Level3.net [4.252.226.253]) by knife.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED34BE4677; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 21:10:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <41D77CC0.4090800@yahoo.com> References: <3D374C4E-5C78-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <41D77CC0.4090800@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <8AA8E33B-5C7C-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:09:55 -0500 To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No MAKEDEV in /dev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 05:10:11 -0000 On Jan 1, 2005, at 11:46 PM, Rob wrote: > Timothy Luoma wrote: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ppp- >> troubleshoot.html tells me to use this command from /dev/: >> sh MAKEDEV cuaa0 cuaa1 cuaa2 cuaa3 >> but there is no MAKEDEV in /dev/ > > Usually there are two entries for this in the documentation, > one for 4.X and another for 5.X systems. > > On 5.3, see 'man MAKEDEV' and 'man devfs', and find out > that MAKEDEV is deprecated by devfs. Ah, I guess this is a place where the documentation hasn't yet been updated. I didn't think to check the manpage until just after I sent my message. FWIW, as a layman/FreeBSD newbie, I'd make a suggestion that the manpage for MAKEDEV make it a bit more clear that having 'devfs' means that MAKEDEV commands are no longer necessary because devfs will take care of it automatically. I found myself trying to read 'man devfs' to figure out a way to manually make cuaa0. TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 05:19:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C327316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:19:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from knife.dreamhost.com (knife.dreamhost.com [66.33.219.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7543743D2D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:19:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.103] (dialup-4.252.224.106.Dial1.Cincinnati1.Level3.net [4.252.224.106]) by knife.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9295E457D; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 21:19:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5DBAA87E-5C4C-11D9-952C-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> References: <1677AECA-5C22-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <5DBAA87E-5C4C-11D9-952C-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:19:25 -0500 To: Eric F Crist X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sharing printers with Mac - Rendezvous? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 05:19:29 -0000 On Jan 1, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Eric F Crist wrote: > I would recommend setting up the lpd daemon. This is supported by Mac > OS X be default, so there's not a whole lot to setup. No Rendevous > necessary. Thanks Eric. I'll try that. I was thinking Rendezvous would be easier than setting up lpd, but I might be wrong. I'm not even sure that my printers (Brother 1240 and HP Deskjet something) support Rendezvous or how it works. TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 05:23:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3A716A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:23:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.webzone.net.au (mail3.webzone.net.au [210.8.36.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C639C43D2D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:23:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lfusco@webzone.net.au) Received: from [192.168.255.2] (unverified [220.240.162.111]) by mail3.webzone.net.au for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:53:35 +1030 Message-ID: <41D78555.10605@webzone.net.au> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:53:33 +1030 From: Lino Fusco User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 5.3 - Write failure on transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 05:23:38 -0000 Hi, I am a newbie to this list and I hope I am posting to the correct list - apologies if I am off target. I am installing FreeBSD 5.3 on a hp netserver LC2000r. The box is a dual processor P3 with three scsi2 drives running in a raid1 configuration with one hot spare. We have six of these boxes. Three of them are running FreeBSD 4.8 or 4.9 without a hitch. I decided to install 5.3 from CD on a fourth box and I am having a problem. I go through the install process. When it goes to write the file structure to the drives it does this in a around 1 second - this seems very fast. Then it starts copying from the CD and I quickly get the following error: "Write failure on transfer! (wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes)" I click ok and the next error message is: "unable to transfer the base distribution from acd0, do you want to try to retrieve it again?". So this has started me troubleshooting the possible causes of the problem: 1) First stop was to suspect the freebsd iso I had burnt was suspect. So I re burnt the cd and the problem persisted. I then suspected the ISO I had downloaded was corrupted. So I downloaded it again, burnt the cd but the problem still persisted. 2) I then suspected the second copy could have come from a cache and therefore may have the same problem as the first copy - so I checked the md5 signature but it lines up with the original from freebsd.org 3) I suspected the CD Rom drive - so I swapped it with one of our other Netserver boxes - problem still persisted. 4)I suspected a drive formatting problem - so I went back into the SCSI software, redid the raid drives and reformatted them - problem still persisted. 5) I suspected another hardware problem - so I pulled out FreeBSD 4.9 to see if that would install - and it did install without any errors. That sort of discounts there being any hardware problems. It points to something specific to freebsd 5.3. So this is where I have got to - FreeBSD 4.9 will install without errors but 5.3 will not install. I suspect the problem has to do with the initial setting up of the file structure - 5.3 is doing this in about one second whereas 4.9 takes closer to a minute to do this. Any thoughts or suggestion? Lino Webzone From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 05:42:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F4A16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:42:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (joel.tallye.com [216.99.199.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE9E43D41 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:42:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lorenl@alzatex.com) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (hosea.tallye.com [127.0.0.1]) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j025gkYs013555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 1 Jan 2005 21:42:46 -0800 Received: (from sttng359@localhost) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10/Submit) id j025gjZB013553; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 21:42:45 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: hosea.tallye.com: sttng359 set sender to lorenl@alzatex.com using -f Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 21:42:45 -0800 From: "Loren M. Lang" To: Lino Fusco Message-ID: <20050102054245.GD14949@alzatex.com> References: <41D78555.10605@webzone.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41D78555.10605@webzone.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 - Write failure on transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 05:42:48 -0000 On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 03:53:33PM +1030, Lino Fusco wrote: > Hi, > > I am a newbie to this list and I hope I am posting to the correct list - > apologies if I am off target. > > I am installing FreeBSD 5.3 on a hp netserver LC2000r. The box is a > dual processor P3 with three scsi2 drives running in a raid1 > configuration with one hot spare. > > We have six of these boxes. Three of them are running FreeBSD 4.8 or 4.9 > without a hitch. > > I decided to install 5.3 from CD on a fourth box and I am having a problem. > > I go through the install process. When it goes to write the file > structure to the drives it does this in a around 1 second - this seems > very fast. Then it starts copying from the CD and I quickly get the > following error: > > "Write failure on transfer! (wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes)" > > I click ok and the next error message is: > > "unable to transfer the base distribution from acd0, do you want to try > to retrieve it again?". > > So this has started me troubleshooting the possible causes of the problem: > > 1) First stop was to suspect the freebsd iso I had burnt was suspect. So > I re burnt the cd and the problem persisted. I then suspected the ISO I > had downloaded was corrupted. So I downloaded it again, burnt the cd but > the problem still persisted. > > 2) I then suspected the second copy could have come from a cache and > therefore may have the same problem as the first copy - so I checked the > md5 signature but it lines up with the original from freebsd.org > > 3) I suspected the CD Rom drive - so I swapped it with one of our other > Netserver boxes - problem still persisted. > > 4)I suspected a drive formatting problem - so I went back into the SCSI > software, redid the raid drives and reformatted them - problem still > persisted. > > 5) I suspected another hardware problem - so I pulled out FreeBSD 4.9 to > see if that would install - and it did install without any errors. That > sort of discounts there being any hardware problems. It points to > something specific to freebsd 5.3. > > So this is where I have got to - FreeBSD 4.9 will install without errors > but 5.3 will not install. > > I suspect the problem has to do with the initial setting up of the file > structure - 5.3 is doing this in about one second whereas 4.9 takes > closer to a minute to do this. > > Any thoughts or suggestion? I believe FreeBSD 5.3 does support using UFS 1 in the install, just check the option in the disklabel program, but if the partitioning also fails then that may not be the problem. > > Lino > Webzone > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 05:59:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6AD16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:59:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.concepts.nl (smtp-4.concepts.nl [213.197.30.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B317143D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 05:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pharmsen@horizon.nl) Received: from [213.148.230.155] (helo=tobaccofarm.concepts.nl) by smtp.concepts.nl with smtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CkylZ-0008PI-99 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:59:04 +0100 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:01:32 +0100 From: Peter Harmsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050102140132.3e4122df@tobaccofarm.concepts.nl> In-Reply-To: <41D5B170.7070600@hysteria.sk> References: <41D5B170.7070600@hysteria.sk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: gdm2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 05:59:37 -0000 On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 21:07:12 +0100 "dusan >>" wrote: If your goal is to start Gnome,it's perhaps faster to edit /etc/ttys. Change on line 8 in /etc/ttys "off" in "on" and "xdm" in "gdm". > hi there. I have a little problem using gdm2 on 5.3, I am using actual > version in ports of gdm2 ad I can't add new session type to it. I have > added file user.desktop to /usr/X11R6/etc/dm/Sessions with this content > but without a result: > > [Desktop Entry] > Encoding=UTF-8 > Name=User > Comment=This session executes your ~/.xinitc file > Exec=~/.xinitrc > TryExec=~/.xinitrc > Icon= > Type=Application > > > > -- > -- . dusan . . jabber: skrat@jabber.sk > -- icq : 322853999 > -- msn : skrat64@hotmail.com > -- > -- | _ ___ _.--. > -- | \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` > -- | / ' ` , __.--' > -- | )/' _/ \ `-_, / > -- | `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', > -- | _.-'_./ {_.' ; / > -- {_.-``-' {_/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:07:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076D016A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:07:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5143143D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:07:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from BARTON (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.rr.com [65.184.201.54]) j0267S4R026666 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:07:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:12:29 +0000 From: jason henson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Balsa 2.2.6 Message-Id: <1104646349l.81772l.0l@BARTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: buildworld fails with sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:07:32 -0000 BARTON# cd /usr/src/etc && make -DNOPROFILE =3D=3D=3D> sendmail make: don't know how to make freebsd.cf. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/etc. I searched the archives and found where make -n freebsd.cf or make =20 obj, make all would fix it. No good here. I also deleted usr/src/etc =20 and did it again. Any suggestions? $ uname -a FreeBSD BARTON 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #2: Sun Nov 21 23:50:50 =20 EST 2004 jason@BARTON:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NINAMORI i386 $=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:09:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B7516A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:09:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2308343D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:09:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mileskeaton@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so363109rne for ; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:09:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IpkF7cdxjNnhYnUv1aVm13o3RsFciMpNfe9UyhmMbd/QL4CCcTX2cq7BKnc4seVHDvJsN7ovh2bzQ7FKWrFbca71RDiddzEQj30JIA8Tg7NVMl/0oRLkvZefa/6O3JVThhBvAz1rDCjhrZoWeGd6gKAnyu0BS/KQFkZfZjee2Ec= Received: by 10.38.4.61 with SMTP id 61mr15002rnd; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:09:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.151.34 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:09:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <59b2d39b0501012209141af96c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:09:51 -0800 From: Miles Keaton To: FreeBSD-questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: new Ruby 1.8.2 makes portupgrade core-dump on FreeBSD 4.10 - anyone else? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Miles Keaton List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:09:52 -0000 The new Ruby version 1.8.2 now makes portupgrade core-dump Ruby on FreeBSD 4.10 for me. Has anyone else seen this? Sorry I don't even know how to do a proper bug-report for this. I'm just a lowly user. :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:16:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72C716A4CE; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:16:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9634B43D53; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:16:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB040519F9; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:16:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:16:13 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Timothy Luoma Message-ID: <20050102061611.GA85010@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3D374C4E-5C78-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <41D77CC0.4090800@yahoo.com> <8AA8E33B-5C7C-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8AA8E33B-5C7C-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: doc@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: No MAKEDEV in /dev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:16:19 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:09:55AM -0500, Timothy Luoma wrote: > FWIW, as a layman/FreeBSD newbie, I'd make a suggestion that the=20 > manpage for MAKEDEV make it a bit more clear that having 'devfs' means=20 > that MAKEDEV commands are no longer necessary because devfs will take=20 > care of it automatically. Please submit a PR (send-pr) with your suggestion, preferably with a patch to the manpage source, or at least with your proposed rewording. Thanks! Kris --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB15GqWry0BWjoQKURAkWoAJ9AQa5JW7yzMQzK9CY1E7xCjmXE2gCgwqOl a5DSXQ0TeHqb64qZ/xjyjX8= =Bqpk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:16:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66CC16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:16:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BCF43D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:16:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A2D4519F9; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:16:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:16:46 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Miles Keaton Message-ID: <20050102061646.GB85010@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <59b2d39b0501012209141af96c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59b2d39b0501012209141af96c@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: new Ruby 1.8.2 makes portupgrade core-dump on FreeBSD 4.10 - anyone else? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:16:51 -0000 --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 10:09:51PM -0800, Miles Keaton wrote: > The new Ruby version 1.8.2 now makes portupgrade core-dump Ruby on > FreeBSD 4.10 for me. >=20 > Has anyone else seen this? >=20 > Sorry I don't even know how to do a proper bug-report for this. I'm > just a lowly user. :-) /usr/ports/UPDATING Kris --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB15HNWry0BWjoQKURAulcAJ0Tu5YRSVJ9mL3XoMY10hSBMsFycwCdEy0T /9QYPlFVrVTV5rJVDX7OjQQ= =c1Gl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tjCHc7DPkfUGtrlw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:18:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FE316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:18:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91B443D54 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:18:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6399519FE; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:17:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:17:58 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: jason henson Message-ID: <20050102061757.GC85010@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1104646349l.81772l.0l@BARTON> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1104646349l.81772l.0l@BARTON> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld fails with sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:18:03 -0000 --lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 06:12:29AM +0000, jason henson wrote: > BARTON# cd /usr/src/etc && make -DNOPROFILE > =3D=3D=3D> sendmail > make: don't know how to make freebsd.cf. Stop > *** Error code 2 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/etc. >=20 > I searched the archives and found where make -n freebsd.cf or make =20 > obj, make all would fix it. No good here. I also deleted usr/src/etc = =20 > and did it again. Any suggestions? Don't do that :-) Running 'make' in random parts of the source tree isn't supported, that's what 'buildworld' is for. Kris --lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB15IVWry0BWjoQKURAloLAKConIoTyFSGB4mAo0U/axE62IaW7QCgwJCK hm7qUADXA3DbD3dlgxWGRVI= =/gGC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lCAWRPmW1mITcIfM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:23:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A4016A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:23:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.webzone.net.au (mail3.webzone.net.au [210.8.36.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9104C43D31 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:23:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@webzone.net.au) Received: from [192.168.255.2] (unverified [220.240.162.111]) by mail3.webzone.net.au; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:53:30 +1030 Message-ID: <41D79361.1050806@webzone.net.au> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:53:29 +1030 From: lists User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Loren M. Lang" References: <41D78555.10605@webzone.net.au> <20050102054245.GD14949@alzatex.com> In-Reply-To: <20050102054245.GD14949@alzatex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 - Write failure on transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:23:32 -0000 Loren M. Lang wrote: >On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 03:53:33PM +1030, Lino Fusco wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>I am a newbie to this list and I hope I am posting to the correct list - >>apologies if I am off target. >> >>I am installing FreeBSD 5.3 on a hp netserver LC2000r. The box is a >>dual processor P3 with three scsi2 drives running in a raid1 >>configuration with one hot spare. >> >>We have six of these boxes. Three of them are running FreeBSD 4.8 or 4.9 >>without a hitch. >> >>I decided to install 5.3 from CD on a fourth box and I am having a problem. >> >>I go through the install process. When it goes to write the file >>structure to the drives it does this in a around 1 second - this seems >>very fast. Then it starts copying from the CD and I quickly get the >>following error: >> >>"Write failure on transfer! (wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes)" >> >>I click ok and the next error message is: >> >>"unable to transfer the base distribution from acd0, do you want to try >>to retrieve it again?". >> >>So this has started me troubleshooting the possible causes of the problem: >> >>1) First stop was to suspect the freebsd iso I had burnt was suspect. So >>I re burnt the cd and the problem persisted. I then suspected the ISO I >>had downloaded was corrupted. So I downloaded it again, burnt the cd but >>the problem still persisted. >> >>2) I then suspected the second copy could have come from a cache and >>therefore may have the same problem as the first copy - so I checked the >>md5 signature but it lines up with the original from freebsd.org >> >>3) I suspected the CD Rom drive - so I swapped it with one of our other >>Netserver boxes - problem still persisted. >> >>4)I suspected a drive formatting problem - so I went back into the SCSI >>software, redid the raid drives and reformatted them - problem still >>persisted. >> >>5) I suspected another hardware problem - so I pulled out FreeBSD 4.9 to >>see if that would install - and it did install without any errors. That >>sort of discounts there being any hardware problems. It points to >>something specific to freebsd 5.3. >> >>So this is where I have got to - FreeBSD 4.9 will install without errors >>but 5.3 will not install. >> >>I suspect the problem has to do with the initial setting up of the file >>structure - 5.3 is doing this in about one second whereas 4.9 takes >>closer to a minute to do this. >> >>Any thoughts or suggestion? >> >> > >I believe FreeBSD 5.3 does support using UFS 1 in the install, just >check the option in the disklabel program, but if the partitioning also >fails then that may not be the problem. > > > >>Lino >>Webzone >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > > Hi, Tried setting the partitions to UFS1 - FreeBSD 5.3 then takes closer to a minute to setup the partitions just like 4.9 - but still get the same error message when it goes to copy the files. Thanks but did not work. Lino From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:26:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681BA16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:26:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB44E43D45 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:26:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from BARTON (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.rr.com [65.184.201.54]) j026QO4R003352 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:26:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:31:26 +0000 From: jason henson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1104646349l.81772l.0l@BARTON> <20050102061757.GC85010@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050102061757.GC85010@xor.obsecurity.org> (from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun Jan 2 01:17:58 2005) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.2.6 Message-Id: <1104647486l.81835l.0l@BARTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: buildworld fails with sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:26:27 -0000 On 01/02/05 01:17:58, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 06:12:29AM +0000, jason henson wrote: > > BARTON# cd /usr/src/etc && make -DNOPROFILE > > =3D=3D=3D> sendmail > > make: don't know how to make freebsd.cf. Stop > > *** Error code 2 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/etc. > > > > I searched the archives and found where make -n freebsd.cf or make >=20 > > obj, make all would fix it. No good here. I also deleted > usr/src/etc > > and did it again. Any suggestions? >=20 > Don't do that :-) Running 'make' in random parts of the source tree > isn't supported, that's what 'buildworld' is for. >=20 > Kris > I know and I wouldn't do it at random. I just have been trouble =20 shooting and wanted to get the error msg easily without waiting on =20 buildworld. I have done everything by the book, as for the steps go. So still no suggestions? I read on an archive where you had a =20 smilliar/same problem Kris, do you remember it? Also are you an android or something, I see you responding to emails =20 24/7 within minutes. You are like a paid support team! Do you ever =20 sleep? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:46:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C732116A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:46:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C77343D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:46:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from BARTON (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.rr.com [65.184.201.54]) j026kO4R009517 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:46:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:51:26 +0000 From: jason henson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1104646349l.81772l.0l@BARTON> <1104647486l.81835l.0l@BARTON> In-Reply-To: <1104647486l.81835l.0l@BARTON> (from jason@ec.rr.com on Sun Jan 2 01:31:26 2005) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.2.6 Message-Id: <1104648686l.81943l.0l@BARTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: buildworld fails with sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:46:27 -0000 On 01/02/05 01:31:26, jason henson wrote: > On 01/02/05 01:17:58, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 06:12:29AM +0000, jason henson wrote: >> > BARTON# cd /usr/src/etc && make -DNOPROFILE >> > =3D=3D=3D> sendmail >> > make: don't know how to make freebsd.cf. Stop >> > *** Error code 2 >> > >> > Stop in /usr/src/etc. >> > >> > I searched the archives and found where make -n freebsd.cf or =20 >> make >>=20 >> > obj, make all would fix it. No good here. I also deleted >> usr/src/etc >> > and did it again. Any suggestions? >>=20 >> Don't do that :-) Running 'make' in random parts of the source tree >> isn't supported, that's what 'buildworld' is for. >>=20 >> Kris >> > I know and I wouldn't do it at random. I just have been trouble =20 > shooting and wanted to get the error msg easily without waiting on =20 > buildworld. I have done everything by the book, as for the steps go. > So still no suggestions? I read on an archive where you had a =20 > smilliar/same problem Kris, do you remember it? >=20 > Also are you an android or something, I see you responding to emails =20 > 24/7 within minutes. You are like a paid support team! Do you ever =20 > sleep? > I think I got it! Some more searching revealed a comman problem with =20 the standard refuse file having src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc* in it. =20 Hopifully this will solve the problem. Thanks for the help, Keep up the good work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:50:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E72316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:50:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gizmo06ps.bigpond.com (gizmo06ps.bigpond.com [144.140.71.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5770F43D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ekeberg@bigpond.net.au) Received: (qmail 8463 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2005 06:50:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO PSMAM17.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.116) by gizmo06ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 2 Jan 2005 06:50:20 -0000 Received: from cpe-144-137-206-132.sa.bigpond.net.au ([144.137.206.132]) by PSMAM17.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 291/24648442) with SMTP id 24648442; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:50:20 +1000 Message-ID: <41D79998.2040306@bigpond.net.au> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:20:00 +0930 From: Hugh Ekeberg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050101 X-Accept-Language: en-au, en, ar, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: build emacs - Xaw3d.8 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:50:23 -0000 Friends While doing a compile of Emacs-21.3, the build process ended with the following error: ===> emacs-21.3_3 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> emacs-21.3_3 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf213 - found ===> emacs-21.3_3 depends on shared library: Xaw3d.8 - not found ===> Verifying install for Xaw3d.8 in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/Xaw3d ===> Returning to build of emacs-21.3_3 Error: shared library "Xaw3d.8" does not exist *** Error code 1 This has also happened to me while trying to compile Xfig & Plugger-Plugins-Hubbe. The Zaw3d libraries are installed and a file shows a number of references to *xaw3d* but not to "Xaw3d.8" For example: /usr/ports/distfiles/Xaw3d-1.5.tar.gz /usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xaw3d /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw3d.so /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw3d.so.7 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw3d.a /usr/X11R6/share/doc/Xaw3d /var/db/pkg/Xaw3d-1.5 I can't find any references to this problem in the archives or the web. Does anyone have any ideas? If I installed Xfig & Emacs as a package over FTP, would that process interfere with my existing libraries? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 07:08:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22D216A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:08:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D02E43D2D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:08:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgnezdov@pobox.com) X-Sasl-enc: lUWFX1lcpXg9H9T65MaU1w 1104649707 Received: from localhost.localdomain (207-224-115-144.spkn.qwest.net [207.224.115.144]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B341C488F5 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 02:08:27 -0500 (EST) From: Sergei Gnezdov To: Questions FreeBSD Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NchIhK0PTRFtbgMGfCtl" Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 23:08:34 -0800 Message-Id: <1104649714.651.24.camel@owl2> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: CDROM Mounting and Permissions (easy) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:08:28 -0000 --=-NchIhK0PTRFtbgMGfCtl Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I need to mount /dev/acd0 (cdrom) from the standard user account. Do I have to give the user account write access to /dev/acd0 device or there is another way I don't know about? --=-NchIhK0PTRFtbgMGfCtl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB153yLG0a64EQke4RAnFTAKCzICdJDlMEWFAWhlId9rTJyildBwCgsRHj whgGGbJS3BKhr5wb3LVJkcY= =34kk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-NchIhK0PTRFtbgMGfCtl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 07:12:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BB716A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:12:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from S3.cableone.net (smtp3.cableone.net [24.116.0.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C1F43D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from fennec.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.123.89]) by S3.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S3) with ESMTP id 6017430 for multiple; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:27:01 -0700 Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 23:12:51 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: Joe Schmoe Message-ID: <20050101231251.2762d3ed@fennec.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20041226014550.45577.qmail@web53308.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20041226014550.45577.qmail@web53308.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 31, in=52, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.123.89 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: triple monitor hardware setup on FBSD - suggestions needed... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:12:46 -0000 On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 17:45:49 -0800 (PST) Joe Schmoe wrote: > > I am currently running a triple-monitor setup under > winXP, with an extended desktop that stretches across > all three monitors. I like it. > > I would, however, like to use FreeBSD. > > So, first off, what hardware (video card) comes to > mind for doing triple screens with FreeBSD ? A matrox > P750 comes to mind, but when you run it with three > screens, they downgrade to 1280x1024, which is bad. I > am happy to consider multiple video cards to > accomplish this ... at the very least I need 1600x1200 > out of each card, preferably 1920x1200 ... You can run as many as the motherboard and powersupply will allow for ^_^ > Second, what is the support for something like this in > XFree86, or x.org ? Really nice for cards that support it. I personally would suggest looking at nvidia cards. > What I am really looking for is > the ability to create virtually sized screens - so > instead of having three total (physical) screens that > I can maximize windows inside of, I want to split each > physical screen in half for a total of 6 virtual > screens - so there are six total areas within which I > can maximize a window in ... this is something I am > really trying to accomplish. I am a little lost on what you mean by virtual screen. But what you want is xinerama and a window manager that nicely supports it. Fluxbox last I checked did it nicely. Any ways, window placement and maximization and the like are a job of the window manager, not the X server. I eventually got annoyed with the xinerama part and went back to just letting them act like three seperate screens. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 07:23:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E056916A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:23:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gemcons.com (mail.gemcons.com [66.111.54.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43C0643D45 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:23:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from VFoulk@KEWD.com) Received: (qmail 82962 invoked by uid 399); 2 Jan 2005 08:46:37 -0000 X-Virus-Scan: Scanned by clamdmail 0.15 on cp.gemcons.com (no viruses); Sun, _d Jan 2005 03:46:37 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO kewdaeahnhd04i) (68.63.186.182) by mail.gemcons.com with SMTP; 2 Jan 2005 08:46:37 -0000 From: "Victor Foulk" To: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:23:31 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c4f09b$f67534d0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cp.gemcons.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=4.0 tests=USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=2.63 Subject: FreeBSD Gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:23:29 -0000 Hello all, I have been looking into setting up a network gateway using a FreeBSD box, so that I may employ many of the network security features of the system (and to overcome the fact that the current network is insecurely connected to a much larger ~public LAN). The configuration would be much like this: {Internet}--{Huge/NastyLAN}--{FreeBSDGate}--{SafeLAN} Most of what I see states that I should use a *minimum* of: 266Mhz processor 64MB RAM 1GB HD (actually ~2GB based on number desired security apps) 2 Compatible NIC's What I really had hoped to find, was more of an experienced networking guru's thumb rule equating the number of safeLAN workstations with the required gateway RAM/Processor; to enable all safeLAN users to experience a minimal network transaction time roughly equivalent to what they would see if plugged directly into a really good hub. Something maybe in the form of: Proc Speed = X*Users+Y RAM = W*Users+Z I am far too new at this to have a clue what numbers to use to even approximate. Any advice on this matter would be most appreciated. Thanks! Victor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 07:50:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4446216A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:50:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zephon.secspace.de (zephon.secspace.de [62.75.136.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FDF43D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@ps102.de) Received: from [192.168.17.11] (pD95F2562.dip.t-dialin.net [217.95.37.98]) by zephon.secspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116ED6EB3B; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:50:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D7A80F.2070003@ps102.de> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 08:51:43 +0100 From: Volker Kindermann User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: artware References: <72cf361e05010113067efde9dd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: courier-imap installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:50:07 -0000 Hi Ben, > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-imap-pop3d.sh.sample (because I'm trying > to run a POP3 server) and now I get: > > /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/pop3d does not exist, forgot make install-configure? perhaps you should rename the courier files in /usr/local/etc/rc.d from .sample to ? Like: cd /usr/local/etc/rc.d mv courier-imap-pop3d.sh.sample courier-imap-pop3d.sh And then try again? -volker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 08:03:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F6116A4CE; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:03:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EF843D1F; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:03:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DDE5502; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02682-09; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:10:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 064CA54F1; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050102081003.064CA54F1@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-12-12 - 2005-01-01 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 08:03:35 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 08:41:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D478616A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:41:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92.asp.att.net [63.240.76.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7525E43D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46]) by sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92) with ESMTP id <20050102084106i92002aau6e>; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:41:11 +0000 Message-ID: <41D7B3A1.5030507@nbritton.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 02:41:05 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Foulk References: <000001c4f09b$f67534d0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> In-Reply-To: <000001c4f09b$f67534d0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 08:41:12 -0000 Victor Foulk wrote: >Hello all, > >I have been looking into setting up a network gateway >using a FreeBSD box, so that I may employ many of the >network security features of the system (and to >overcome the fact that the current network is >insecurely connected to a much larger ~public LAN). > >The configuration would be much like this: >{Internet}--{Huge/NastyLAN}--{FreeBSDGate}--{SafeLAN} > >Most of what I see states that I should use >a *minimum* of: > >266Mhz processor >64MB RAM >1GB HD (actually ~2GB based on number > desired security apps) >2 Compatible NIC's > > The "minimum" is what you can get FreeBSD to run on, If you can can get FreeBSD working on a 386 then that is the minimum but for practicality a 486 is the absolute minimum. As far as the minimun amount of disk space is conserned the same thing as above goes, here is a FreeBSD router project that works on as little as 5MB: http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/ . Same thing goes for RAM and obviously you need to have at least two Network Interface Cards unless you wanted to route all traffic to /dev/null. >What I really had hoped to find, was more of an experienced >networking guru's thumb rule equating the number of safeLAN >workstations with the required gateway RAM/Processor; to >enable all safeLAN users to experience a minimal network >transaction time roughly equivalent to what they would see >if plugged directly into a really good hub. >Something maybe in the form of: >Proc Speed = X*Users+Y >RAM = W*Users+Z > > You would plug them into a switch not a hub.... if you did that then the router would be the least of your problems as the bottleneck is the hub now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 09:19:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7BC16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:19:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cypherpunks.to (pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to [82.94.251.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0904F43D41 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:19:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shamrock@cypherpunks.to) X-PGP-Universal: processed; by keys.cypherpunks.to on Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:19:13 -0800 From: "Lucky Green" To: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:18:56 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Thread-Index: AcTwrBVAgdDYLfRWReCR38UamQnQgg== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20050102091914.3D0B9114F1@mail.cypherpunks.to> Subject: kern.maxfiles formula? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:19:16 -0000 I=20am=20running=20FreeBSD=205.3=20on=20a=20dual=20CPU=20system=20with=20= 1=20GB=20of=20RAM=20with=20under=20a dozen=20of=20very=20active=20users=20and=20a=20few=20rather=20active=20pr= ocesses.=20The=20system keeps=20running=20out=20of=20FDs,=20causing=20any=20number=20of=20problem= s,=20such=20as=20preventing ssh=20logins. sysctl=20kern.maxfiles=20shows=20a=20maximum=20of=2012328=20FDs.=20My=20k= ernel=20config=20file=20has =22maxusers=22=20set=20to=200,=20which=20means=20the=20kern.maxfiles=20li= mit=20must=20be=20the=20OS default. What=20is=20the=20maximum=20number=20of=20FDs=20that=20can=20be=20set=20o= n=20a=20system=20with=201=20GB=20of RAM?=20What=20would=20it=20be=20for=202=20GB=20of=20RAM?=20In=20other=20w= ords,=20how=20many=20FDs=20can=20a FreeBSD=205.3=20system=20safely=20support=20for=20each=20GB=20of=20RAM? Thanks, --Lucky ________________________________________________________________ This=20email=20was=20not=20PGP=20encrypted.=20The=20next=20email=20can=20= be=20PGP=20encrypted, but=20for=20this=20to=20happen=20you=20need=20to=20first=20click=20on=20t= o=20the=20URL=20below: https://keys.cypherpunks.to/b/b.e?r=3Dfreebsd-questions=2540freebsd.org=26= n=3DIAwOVV4jo0Vi3U6uOkiaEA=253D=253D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 09:39:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2911B16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:39:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3DB43D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:39:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so70147rne for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:39:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=G0HUMmVet7S9KSljB9glAEXvu9c0KEYJd04xmO+6ElR2ASTwQ80fD1ogif5croURLn+giyq/IGRI/72uKs4k29e7SPYHIKzR+tcvRb86ousu8drry7FJUULF9Hi46fCIfMxLY3mz/yXGHKfqBygTmBJ87jKVmEVgSRDHGZ8FZ7Y= Received: by 10.38.97.47 with SMTP id u47mr178458rnb; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:39:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.101.3 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:39:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 03:39:45 -0600 From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20041227083502.2d865466.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041227083502.2d865466.wmoran@potentialtech.com> cc: ctodd@chrismiller.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: write state to swap for multi-os boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eric Kjeldergaard List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:39:46 -0000 > > Has anyone considered or accomplished allowing FreeBSD to write it's > > current state (including window manager, windows, etc) to swap and > > allowing a subsequent reload of the system to last state? This would be > > sort of like the sleep mode of a laptop, but would allow the user to boot > > into another OS (like Winblows) briefly and then resume their FreeBSD > > system state. I'd love to use FreeBSD as my primary desktop, but there may > > be times where I'll need to boot into Windows for apps that don't run > > under Wine. Since I tend to have a lot of application windows open, it's a > > PITA to have to reload everything on boot. Thoughts? > > This isn't a direct answer to your question, but you might want to have > a look at vmware. > vmware and qemu (open source semi-alternative) are good ways to accomplish booting Windows from inside of FreeBSD. What you want, however, is something that has been on the wishlist for a little while now. Suspend-to-RAM has been around and works fine for a while, but Suspend-to-disc (which Linux currently has) is yet to be written. There have been suggestions of saving the RAM to swap space and shutting down. I hope to see someone put this into action soon. It'd be a great feature. (Especially for mobiles) -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 09:42:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBA816A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:42:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92.asp.att.net [63.240.76.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CAC43D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:42:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46]) by sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92) with ESMTP id <20050102094212i92002amnoe>; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:42:12 +0000 Message-ID: <41D7C1F3.805@nbritton.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 03:42:11 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Gnezdov References: <1104649714.651.24.camel@owl2> In-Reply-To: <1104649714.651.24.camel@owl2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Questions FreeBSD Subject: Re: CDROM Mounting and Permissions (easy) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:42:13 -0000 Sergei Gnezdov wrote: >Hi, > >I need to mount /dev/acd0 (cdrom) from the standard user account. > >Do I have to give the user account write access to /dev/acd0 device or >there is another way I don't know about? > > http://groups-beta.google.com/group/lucky.freebsd.questions/browse_thread/thread/a4811769719d0538 (look at the date on the thread :-) ) http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#USER-FLOPPYMOUNT From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 09:48:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C3F16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:48:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91.asp.att.net [63.240.76.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C6F43D48 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:48:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46]) by sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91) with ESMTP id <20050102094815i9100rfs1pe>; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:48:30 +0000 Message-ID: <41D7C35E.6030802@nbritton.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 03:48:14 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikolas Britton References: <41D3E300.2000906@nbritton.org> <41D7220D.8070601@taborandtashell.net> <41D7263D.5010002@nbritton.org> In-Reply-To: <41D7263D.5010002@nbritton.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Prism GT Chipset, hostap? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:48:31 -0000 http://linux.junsun.net/intersil-prism/ http://tools.collegeterrace.net/prismfw/ http://www.red-bean.com/proski/firmware/readme.html http://www.red-bean.com/proski/firmware/ http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2004_02_01_taosecurity_archive.html ("Adventures in Flashing Firmware") http://tools.collegeterrace.net/openap-ct/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 09:55:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6412616A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:55:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099C643D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:55:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from artware@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so66531rnf for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:55:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=bpIdHc5Z2tStqutA53RFmE3o3SPLdCdEDbxsMzvU/sA+lYP2TFn82XDybRrj4HkERtrRxMJoX7IpCcoRY+Dr+Tf5PNFDG/iwJTOY1fLOi7mlO39L3Nd0LxNRTZbqH4SZpPify7a9TP/CV7XzjReXGnrfxtgWWVq3DPEpOrtgEJg= Received: by 10.38.15.39 with SMTP id 39mr270547rno; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:55:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.65.13 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 01:55:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 03:55:19 -0600 From: artware To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41D7A80F.2070003@ps102.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <72cf361e05010113067efde9dd@mail.gmail.com> <41D7A80F.2070003@ps102.de> Subject: Re: courier-imap installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: artware List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:55:20 -0000 Thanks, though I've switched to qpopper, and it's working fine. Now my only problem is trying to get postfix working with TLS and SASL. I'm working off of these instructions: http://yocum.org/faqs/postfix-tls-sasl.html But even though postfix and saslauthd are running with no problems, I can't seem to coax the server to accept TLS connections with SASL authentication... Telneting into port 25, the server is totally silent. - ben On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 08:51:43 +0100, Volker Kindermann wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > > /usr/local/etc/rc.d/courier-imap-pop3d.sh.sample (because I'm trying > > to run a POP3 server) and now I get: > > > > /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/pop3d does not exist, forgot make install-configure? > > perhaps you should rename the courier files in /usr/local/etc/rc.d from > .sample to ? Like: > > cd /usr/local/etc/rc.d > mv courier-imap-pop3d.sh.sample courier-imap-pop3d.sh > > And then try again? > > -volker > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 10:27:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D39A16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:27:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (joel.tallye.com [216.99.199.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D92D43E4C for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:26:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lorenl@alzatex.com) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (hosea.tallye.com [127.0.0.1]) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j02APnYs021924 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 02:25:49 -0800 Received: (from sttng359@localhost) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10/Submit) id j02APcXr021918; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 02:25:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: hosea.tallye.com: sttng359 set sender to lorenl@alzatex.com using -f Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 02:25:38 -0800 From: "Loren M. Lang" To: Weehamama@aol.com Message-ID: <20050102102538.GE14949@alzatex.com> References: <199.3548f13a.2f00bff7@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <199.3548f13a.2f00bff7@aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does freeBSD have CORBA specs and does it have J2sdk1.4.2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:27:17 -0000 On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 08:31:35PM -0500, Weehamama@aol.com wrote: > I have been told it does have both already, but I can't find it in any of > documentations. I'm specifically talking about freebsd on emulab.net. Yes, freebsd has had both corba and sun java for a long time. corba is needed by the gnome desktop which is very well supported on freebsd plus many gnome app even if you don't use the gnome desktop. Your pretty much guaranteed that freebsd will have corba already installed and running because of this. It uses ORBit, the same implementation used on linux and so all the same docs apply to freebsd, just check out orbits website. For java, freebsd can use ibm or sun's java implementation. ibm runs under linux emulation and sun can run under linux emulation or natively. There are also a few open source jvm's like kaffe available. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 10:35:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4D616A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:35:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8666043D49 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:35:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76CBA439D; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:36:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34204-01; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:36:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA2B4218; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:36:27 +0100 (CET) From: "Jorn Argelo" To: "Loren M. Lang" , Weehamama@aol.com Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:36:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20050102103335.M37543@wcborstel.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050102102538.GE14949@alzatex.com> References: <199.3548f13a.2f00bff7@aol.com> <20050102102538.GE14949@alzatex.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 82.161.134.53 (jorn) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.wcborstel.nl cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does freeBSD have CORBA specs and does it have J2sdk1.4.2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:35:55 -0000 On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 02:25:38 -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote > On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 08:31:35PM -0500, Weehamama@aol.com wrote: > > I have been told it does have both already, but I can't find it in any of > > documentations. I'm specifically talking about freebsd on emulab.net. > > Yes, freebsd has had both corba and sun java for a long time. corba > is needed by the gnome desktop which is very well supported on > freebsd plus many gnome app even if you don't use the gnome desktop. > Your pretty much guaranteed that freebsd will have corba already > installed and running because of this. It uses ORBit, the same > implementation used on linux and so all the same docs apply to > freebsd, just check out orbits website. > > For java, freebsd can use ibm or sun's java implementation. ibm runs > under linux emulation and sun can run under linux emulation or natively. > There are also a few open source jvm's like kaffe available. Also, you have the blackdown-java project. AFAIK it's open source as well, and it uses the Linux compatibility. Last time I compiled Java you required a working Java enviroment before you were able to compile Sun's Java implementation. Might be handy to keep that in mind. Cheers, Jorn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 10:44:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A1216A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:44:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mr.tuwien.ac.at (mr1-n.kom.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.2.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475C943E23 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:21:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e0025265@student.tuwien.ac.at) Received: from webmail.zserv.tuwien.ac.at (lps.ben.tuwien.ac.at [193.170.74.11]) by mr.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.8) with SMTP id j02ALLTl015850 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:21:22 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: V-webmail 1.5.1 ( http://www.v-webmail.co.uk/ ) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:21:22 +0100 From: "Florian Hengstberger" To: FreeBSD mailinglist X-Vwebmail-Auth: e0025265@stud3.tuwien.ac.at X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: TCP_RESTRICT_RST in 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:44:18 -0000 Following the istructions of Mrs. Lavigne on ONLamp.com I was trying to build a kernel with the options TCP_RESTRICT_RST. config ignores this option. How can I include this in 5.2.1, I can't find a similar option in my LINT file. Thanks Florian ------------------------------------------------------ Linux/BSD: The daemons are not longer just in my head! ------------------------------------------------------ Florian Hengstberger e0025265@student.tuwien.ac.at http://stud3.tuwien.ac.at/~e0025265 ------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 10:44:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F7116A4E0 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:44:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C891643DE2 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:13:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6AB6551814; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 02:13:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 02:13:10 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Lucky Green Message-ID: <20050102101309.GA72018@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050102091914.3D0B9114F1@mail.cypherpunks.to> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050102091914.3D0B9114F1@mail.cypherpunks.to> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.maxfiles formula? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:44:19 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 01:18:56AM -0800, Lucky Green wrote: > I am running FreeBSD 5.3 on a dual CPU system with 1 GB of RAM with under= a > dozen of very active users and a few rather active processes. The system > keeps running out of FDs, causing any number of problems, such as prevent= ing > ssh logins. >=20 > sysctl kern.maxfiles shows a maximum of 12328 FDs. My kernel config file = has > "maxusers" set to 0, which means the kern.maxfiles limit must be the OS > default. >=20 > What is the maximum number of FDs that can be set on a system with 1 GB of > RAM? What would it be for 2 GB of RAM? In other words, how many FDs can a > FreeBSD 5.3 system safely support for each GB of RAM? A truly enormous number :-) You just need to increase the value of kern.maxfiles in /boot/loader.conf as appropriate for your workload. kris --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB18k1Wry0BWjoQKURAqeNAJ9EAROtU+BRpCMK1Jy5+kX7Z6ngPQCg/D0l JPUG2sRX4aa/b5u9Qfn9X4I= =2opi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 11:52:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B190D16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:52:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chung.yikes.com (node-4024052a.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.5.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2802043D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:52:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leonard@chung.yikes.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chung.yikes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488E01A84B for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 03:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from chung.yikes.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chung.yikes.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89381-01 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 03:52:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from emachine.my.domain (emachine.my.domain [192.168.3.2]) by chung.yikes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33BD1A846 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 03:52:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 03:47:37 -0800 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Message-ID: <21DD5D42C3DAC64C91CF8DB890CA57EB014852@emachine.my.domain> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Setting IMAPd MAILDIR? Thread-Index: AcTwwNsND18ojwOYT0+lSxq906+nUA== From: "Leonard Chung" To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at chung.yikes.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Setting IMAPd MAILDIR? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 11:52:58 -0000 Hi there, =20 I recently upgraded courier-imap using portupgrade, and I've noticed that it no longer uses the proper maildir directory (./Maildir), but rather just the user home directory. =20 This seems to have to do with the change of courier-imap to rc.subr style scripts. It uses a variable called MAILDIRPATH which isn't defined anywhere that I can find: =20 /usr/local/libexec/courier-imap/couriertcpd -address=3D$ADDRESS \ = -stderrlogger=3D${exec_prefix}/sbin/courierlogger \ -stderrloggername=3Dimapd \ -maxprocs=3D$MAXDAEMONS -maxperip=3D$MAXPERIP \ -pid=3D$PIDFILE $TCPDOPTS \ $PORT ${exec_prefix}/sbin/imaplogin $LIBAUTHMODULES \ ${exec_prefix}/bin/imapd ${MAILDIRPATH}" =20 If I delete ${MAILDIRPATH} and replace it with "./Maildir", then everything works fine. However, I imagine there is a better (i.e. recommended) place for me to put this information. This is a machine running 4.10REL. =20 Can somebody tell me where MAILDIRPATH is supposed to be defined within this new rc.subr scheme and also if anybody has any idea why the rc script uses a variable which is undefined? =20 Thanks! =20 Leonard =20 leonard@chung:/usr/local/libexec/courier-imap# more imapd.rc=20 #! /bin/sh # $Id: imapd.rc.in,v 1.26 2004/04/18 15:54:38 mrsam Exp $ # # Copyright 1998 - 2002 Double Precision, Inc. # See COPYING for distribution information. =20 =20 prefix=3D/usr/local exec_prefix=3D/usr/local bindir=3D${exec_prefix}/bin libexecdir=3D/usr/local/libexec/courier-imap =20 if test ! -f /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd then echo "/usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd does not exist, forgot make install-configure?" exit 1 fi =20 if test ! -f /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd-ssl then echo "/usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd-ssl does not exist, forgot make install-configure?" exit 1 fi =20 TLS_CACHEFILE=3D"" . /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd-ssl . /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd =20 case $1 in start) LIBAUTHMODULES=3D"" for f in `echo $AUTHMODULES` do LIBAUTHMODULES=3D"$LIBAUTHMODULES /usr/local/libexec/courier-imap/authlib/$f" done =20 if test -x ${libexecdir}/authlib/authdaemond then /usr/bin/env - DEBUG_LOGIN=3D"$DEBUG_LOGIN" ${libexecdir}/authlib/authdaemond start fi =20 if test "$TLS_CACHEFILE" !=3D "" then rm -f $TLS_CACHEFILE fi =20 ulimit -v $IMAP_ULIMITD /usr/bin/env - /bin/sh -c " set -a ; prefix=3D/usr/local ; exec_prefix=3D/usr/local ; bindir=3D${exec_prefix}/bin ; libexecdir=3D/usr/local/libexec/courier-imap ; . /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd ; \ . /usr/local/etc/courier-imap/imapd-ssl ; \ IMAP_STARTTLS=3D$IMAPDSTARTTLS ; export IMAP_STARTTLS ; = \ TLS_PROTOCOL=3D$TLS_STARTTLS_PROTOCOL ; \ /usr/local/libexec/courier-imap/couriertcpd -address=3D$ADDRESS \ = -stderrlogger=3D${exec_prefix}/sbin/courierlogger \ -stderrloggername=3Dimapd \ -maxprocs=3D$MAXDAEMONS -maxperip=3D$MAXPERIP \ -pid=3D$PIDFILE $TCPDOPTS \ $PORT ${exec_prefix}/sbin/imaplogin $LIBAUTHMODULES \ ${exec_prefix}/bin/imapd ${MAILDIRPATH}" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^ ;; stop) /usr/local/libexec/courier-imap/couriertcpd -pid=3D$PIDFILE = -stop if test -x ${libexecdir}/authlib/authdaemond then ${libexecdir}/authlib/authdaemond stop fi ;; esac exit 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 12:42:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE8616A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:42:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B42843D45 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:42:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 31241 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2005 12:42:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.48]) ([pbs]775067@[213.54.60.77]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Jan 2005 12:42:19 -0000 From: Fabian Keil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:41:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20041231111916.86047.qmail@web50201.mail.yahoo.com> <200412310703.06294.algould@datawok.com> In-Reply-To: <200412310703.06294.algould@datawok.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501021341.54023.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> cc: babaloo munchies cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Production Release 5.3 Installation Won't Boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:42:24 -0000 On Friday 31 December 2004 14:03, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > On Friday 31 December 2004 05:19 am, babaloo munchies wrote: > > I downloaded ISO images disc 1 & disc 2 & the boot > > disk for FreeBSD 5.3 to install on a Pentium MMX > > machine. None of these discs will boot for the > > installation! What happens is the CD drive fires up, > > I see a couple of lines from FreeBSD--the bootloader > > or something--it acts like it's trying to boot. The > > CD drive spins up, the two or three lines flash on the > > screen but then the whole computer restarts. It keeps > > doing this over and over again for each disc. > > > > I had an old FreeBSD 4.8 disc and it booted fine. I > > thought maybe my burner had problems so I burned a > > Linux distro and it booted fine. > > > > So the problem cannot be the CD medium (3 cds w/ same > > problem?), not the CD burner and not the machine. > > What's going on? This is the third time I've tried > > FreeBSD and failed to get it to work. I just give up > > and revert to linux because at least I can install it > > each and every time. But I want to use FreeBSD. > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > Perhaps the problem is with the iso image. Try downloading the iso file > for CD1 again. Comparing the md5sum of the image with the one at the server might save bandwidth. Regards Fabian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 12:42:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916BD16A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:42:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF3D43D46 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:42:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 31241 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2005 12:42:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.48]) ([pbs]775067@[213.54.60.77]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Jan 2005 12:42:19 -0000 From: Fabian Keil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:41:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20041231111916.86047.qmail@web50201.mail.yahoo.com> <200412310703.06294.algould@datawok.com> In-Reply-To: <200412310703.06294.algould@datawok.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501021341.54023.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> cc: babaloo munchies cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Production Release 5.3 Installation Won't Boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:42:24 -0000 On Friday 31 December 2004 14:03, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > On Friday 31 December 2004 05:19 am, babaloo munchies wrote: > > I downloaded ISO images disc 1 & disc 2 & the boot > > disk for FreeBSD 5.3 to install on a Pentium MMX > > machine. None of these discs will boot for the > > installation! What happens is the CD drive fires up, > > I see a couple of lines from FreeBSD--the bootloader > > or something--it acts like it's trying to boot. The > > CD drive spins up, the two or three lines flash on the > > screen but then the whole computer restarts. It keeps > > doing this over and over again for each disc. > > > > I had an old FreeBSD 4.8 disc and it booted fine. I > > thought maybe my burner had problems so I burned a > > Linux distro and it booted fine. > > > > So the problem cannot be the CD medium (3 cds w/ same > > problem?), not the CD burner and not the machine. > > What's going on? This is the third time I've tried > > FreeBSD and failed to get it to work. I just give up > > and revert to linux because at least I can install it > > each and every time. But I want to use FreeBSD. > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > Perhaps the problem is with the iso image. Try downloading the iso file > for CD1 again. Comparing the md5sum of the image with the one at the server might save bandwidth. Regards Fabian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 13:06:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B4416A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:06:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91.asp.att.net [63.240.76.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58E643D3F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:06:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46]) by sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91) with ESMTP id <20050102130604i9100rfm7te>; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:06:05 +0000 Message-ID: <41D7F1BB.6020402@nbritton.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:06:03 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Weird problem with 3C509 ISA NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:06:06 -0000 I was looking at the dmesg output on my firewall and "re"-remembered that I have this 3Com 509 card that doesn't work quite right. take a look at the demsg output below... dmesg: ep0: <3Com 3C509-TPO EtherLink III> at port 0x300-0x30f irq 10 on isa0 ep0: No irq?! ep0: ep_alloc() failed! (6) device_probe_and_attach: ep0 attach returned 6 ep1: <3Com 3C509B-TPO EtherLink III (PnP)> at port 0x210-0x21f irq 3 on isa0 ep1: Ethernet address 00:10:4b:54:39:52 There is only one of those cards in the system yet there are two ep devices. IIRC I have always had problems with this card in any system/OS I put it in, infact FreeBSD is the only OS I can get it to work in... I also have an identical clone of this card (might be a diffrent revision) that works perfectly in FreeBSD or any system I stick it in. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 13:11:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E2716A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:11:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx.networkiv.net (mx.networkiv.net [65.205.143.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02EA43D45 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:11:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from slm@networkiv.net) Received: by mx.networkiv.net (Postfix, from userid 5225) id 74144A105C; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:11:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:11:06 -0500 From: "Stephen L. Martin" To: Leonard Chung Message-ID: <20050102131106.GA55268@mx.networkiv.net> References: <21DD5D42C3DAC64C91CF8DB890CA57EB014852@emachine.my.domain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21DD5D42C3DAC64C91CF8DB890CA57EB014852@emachine.my.domain> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting IMAPd MAILDIR? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:11:17 -0000 On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 03:47:37AM -0800, Leonard Chung wrote: > Hi there, > > I recently upgraded courier-imap using portupgrade, and I've noticed > that it no longer uses the proper maildir directory (./Maildir), but > rather just the user home directory. > > This seems to have to do with the change of courier-imap to rc.subr > style scripts. It uses a variable called MAILDIRPATH which isn't defined > anywhere that I can find: > > If I delete ${MAILDIRPATH} and replace it with "./Maildir", then > everything works fine. However, I imagine there is a better (i.e. > recommended) place for me to put this information. This is a machine > running 4.10REL. > > Can somebody tell me where MAILDIRPATH is supposed to be defined within > this new rc.subr scheme and also if anybody has any idea why the rc > script uses a variable which is undefined? $MAILDIRPATH gets defined with the MAILDIRPATH configuration option in either /usr/local/libexec/imapd or /usr/local/libexec/pop3d; dependent on which protocol you choose to run. Example: MAILDIRPATH=Maildir -Stephen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 13:18:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2E216A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:18:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE0C43D39 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:18:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 4936 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2005 13:18:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.48]) ([pbs]775067@[213.54.60.77]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Jan 2005 13:18:20 -0000 From: Fabian Keil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:16:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <4d0730560501010721556089dc@mail.gmail.com> <4d073056050101083563c63c78@mail.gmail.com> <20050101164520.GC4745@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20050101164520.GC4745@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501021416.44109.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> cc: John Wilson cc: cpghost@cordula.ws cc: Xinizul Xinizul Subject: Re: Please help: burncd errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:18:23 -0000 On Saturday 01 January 2005 17:45, cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: > On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:35:39PM +0100, Xinizul Xinizul wrote: > > Could I use another burner tool ? > > Of course. You can try cdrecord from /usr/ports/sysutils/cdrtools. > > For this to work, you need to add > device atapicam > to your kernel config file, recompile, reinstall and reboot the kernel. > Once you've done that, you should see a device 'cd0' in dmesg and /dev. > You can try burncd on /dev/cd0, or cdrecord with the appropriate SCSI ID: > > # cdrecord -scanbus > should then give you the correct SCSI ID a,b,c to use. > > # cdrecord -v dev=a,b,c speed=4 mp3_1.iso > for data CDs. > > # cdrecord -v dev=a,b,c speed=1 -audio track*.wav > for audio CDs. I'd be surprised, if the drive supported speed=1. "Low speed == better quality" is a myth, so I'd change the speed option with -sao (I believe -tao is still the default) and burn at maximum speed. Regards Fabian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 13:37:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEBA16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:37:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADACD43D48 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:37:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkoch@gmx.com) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Jan 2005 13:37:55 -0000 Received: from C3B3BE8A.dial.de.easynet.net (EHLO k62300) (195.179.190.138) by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 02 Jan 2005 14:37:55 +0100 X-Authenticated: #472702 From: "Norbert Koch" To: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:42:41 +0100 Message-ID: <000001c4f0d0$ee7ed5d0$fe78a8c0@k62300> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: HTTP, FIN_WAIT_1 and ppp hangup delay X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:37:57 -0000 Hello. For connecting to internet I am using PPP via ISDN. One of my FreeBSD (4.10) boxes uses kernel sppp, the other one is configured with userland ppp. My isp charges the connection time in seconds resolution so I configured a very short hangup delay of 25 seconds after inactivity. This works fine for udp connections and also for smtp/pop/nntp, but not for http. After closing a web browser (I use konqueror or opera) "netstat -nf inet" shows a lot of active or closing connections. So I reduced all "net.inet.tcp.*" times I could find to not more than 15 seconds. This helped, but still from time to time I see a connection slowly dying in FIN_WAIT_1 state. That means, ppp disconnects and immediately dials again, disconnects again after 25 seconds without any traffic and dials again and so on... for about 3 minutes. I read through the tcp codebut, well, can't say, I really look through it. May be, there is still a hard-coded timeout, I could manipulate through an additional sysctl? I am rather sure that it is a problem of the tcp protocol (or its misuse), and not an isdn or ppp problem. (BTW, the windows software Fritz!ISDN, shipped with the AVM isdn card, does quite a good job with short hangup delays, but I don't know how) Any ideas? May be there is a way to RST a tcp connection in the ppp-down script? Or perhaps some stateful ipfw rule? Thank you, Norbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 13:48:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A4316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:48:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92.asp.att.net [63.240.76.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6E543D31 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46]) by sccimhc92.asp.att.net (sccimhc92) with ESMTP id <20050102134804i92002b6f6e>; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:48:05 +0000 Message-ID: <41D7FB93.2020804@nbritton.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:48:03 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fabian Keil References: <4d0730560501010721556089dc@mail.gmail.com> <4d073056050101083563c63c78@mail.gmail.com> <20050101164520.GC4745@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> <200501021416.44109.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <200501021416.44109.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: John Wilson cc: cpghost@cordula.ws cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Xinizul Xinizul Subject: Re: Please help: burncd errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:48:06 -0000 Fabian Keil wrote: > >"Low speed == better quality" is a myth > > why so? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 14:14:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E010716A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:14:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [65.125.228.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BEC43D31 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:14:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (danm@localhost.com [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j02EIN5f069921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:18:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j02EINoU069918 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:18:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:18:22 -0500 (EST) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050102091610.K69694@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Question on odd acl/permissions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:14:27 -0000 Hey all, I'd like to make a "live" backup of a file system on a regular basis, and maintain permissions, but have such a thing be only writable by root at any given time. (i.e. I keep a backup drive unmounted, and mount it read-only when users need their data). The thing is, I have to mount it read-write in order to create the archive. Is there any way to make a file system read-only for normal users but read-write by root? This is a local filesystem. -Dan -- "It doesn't matter where I live, because I live in dataspace. That's my hometown." -Steve Roberts, Builder of BEHEMOTH --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 14:21:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE7616A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:21:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DF343D58 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:21:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cl6bS-0001XJ-00 for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:21:06 +0100 Received: from p5480D9C5.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.128.217.197]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:21:06 +0100 Received: from robilad by p5480D9C5.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:21:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Dalibor Topic Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <199.3548f13a.2f00bff7@aol.com> <20050102102538.GE14949@alzatex.com> <20050102103335.M37543@wcborstel.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 84.128.217.197 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217) Sender: news Subject: Re: Does freeBSD have CORBA specs and does it have J2sdk1.4.2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:21:09 -0000 Jorn Argelo wcborstel.nl> writes: > Also, you have the blackdown-java project. AFAIK it's open source as well, and > it uses the Linux compatibility. Unfortunately, as it's a Linux port of Sun's SCSL'd code base, it's also bound by the SCSL, so it's not open source ;( If you need CORBA in an open source VM like Kaffe, you could try using JacORB, a java ORB written in Java, open source, and available from JacORB.org cheers, dalibor topic From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 14:32:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3109116A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:32:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B1C43D46 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:32:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B0269A3F; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:32:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:32:14 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: "Victor Foulk" Message-Id: <20050102093214.10d4b2e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <000001c4f09b$f67534d0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> References: <000001c4f09b$f67534d0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0rc (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:32:19 -0000 "Victor Foulk" wrote: > Hello all, > > I have been looking into setting up a network gateway > using a FreeBSD box, so that I may employ many of the > network security features of the system (and to > overcome the fact that the current network is > insecurely connected to a much larger ~public LAN). > > The configuration would be much like this: > {Internet}--{Huge/NastyLAN}--{FreeBSDGate}--{SafeLAN} > > Most of what I see states that I should use > a *minimum* of: > > 266Mhz processor > 64MB RAM > 1GB HD (actually ~2GB based on number > desired security apps) > 2 Compatible NIC's > > What I really had hoped to find, was more of an experienced > networking guru's thumb rule equating the number of safeLAN > workstations with the required gateway RAM/Processor; to > enable all safeLAN users to experience a minimal network > transaction time roughly equivalent to what they would see > if plugged directly into a really good hub. > Something maybe in the form of: > Proc Speed = X*Users+Y > RAM = W*Users+Z > > I am far too new at this to have a clue what numbers to use > to even approximate. Any advice on this matter would be most > appreciated. > Thanks! > Victor Unfortunatley, there isn't a simple way to develop such an equation. How much CPU/RAM you need is going to be dependant on more than just the number of computers involved. Two additional factors can play a large part: 1) The number of firewall rules and 2) the amount of traffic (such as UDP) that creates dynamic rules. Rules take time to process, and more traffic takes more time with more rules. UDP traffic usually requires stateful rules, and that generates dynamic rules, which increases the amount of time to process each packet. So it's important to design your ruleset carefully to avoid unnecessary processing. However, in my experience, the most critical hardware choice is the network cards themselves. Cheapo network cards will really hurt performance under load. So toss the cheapo Realtek cards into the trash and spend a little extra on an Intel or other name brand card designed for a server. As a general rule of thumb, I won't put FreeBSD on anything smaller than a 1Ghz with 128M of RAM and 4G of disk space. While you can get away with smaller, that's about the minimum before using the box for maintenance purposes becomes a terrible burdon. Try upgrading and rebuilding world on a 266! -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 14:53:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE7D16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:53:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3573343D3F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:53:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ph.schulz@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Jan 2005 14:53:00 -0000 Received: from dsl-213-023-052-249.arcor-ip.net (EHLO [192.168.1.4]) (213.23.52.249) by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 02 Jan 2005 15:53:00 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1954550 Message-ID: <41D80AD6.3070308@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:53:10 +0100 From: Phil Schulz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <000001c4f09b$f67534d0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> <20050102093214.10d4b2e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20050102093214.10d4b2e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: Victor Foulk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:53:02 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > "Victor Foulk" wrote: [...] >>What I really had hoped to find, was more of an experienced >>networking guru's thumb rule equating the number of safeLAN >>workstations with the required gateway RAM/Processor; to >>enable all safeLAN users to experience a minimal network >>transaction time roughly equivalent to what they would see >>if plugged directly into a really good hub. >>Something maybe in the form of: >>Proc Speed = X*Users+Y >>RAM = W*Users+Z >> I don't think _anybody_ can give such a formula. Especially not whithout knowing how much and what kind of traffic your users generate. But as others have said already, good NICs are essential. > > As a general rule of thumb, I won't put FreeBSD on anything smaller > than a 1Ghz with 128M of RAM and 4G of disk space. While you can > get away with smaller, that's about the minimum before using the > box for maintenance purposes becomes a terrible burdon. Try upgrading > and rebuilding world on a 266! > You can always build world remotely. 1GHz seems to be overkill for a router. Just think of energy consumption. Regards, Phil. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 1 14:47:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EF016A4CE for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:47:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54406.mail.yahoo.com (web54406.mail.yahoo.com [68.142.225.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FF8643D3F for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:47:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vctw@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 97129 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jan 2005 14:47:43 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=lLPjgan/Yx/gx+lSvKrl78osXZ6qW731QmBrLKcVIQt+FUESG+DytSgvl8neYIoDOV0z2+p8B84ioyifH5u1xWIukTvUUFA3xx0ZMHhVGa6EOcSEiDteyA77YJqZLbeyzX/boJ4D8LpIyhAspZgRT6BZN6t0zpv1mtkt5HYHEeU= ; Message-ID: <20050101144743.97127.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [61.228.4.184] by web54406.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:47:43 CST Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:47:43 +0800 (CST) From: Vincent Chen To: FreeBSD maillist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:01:27 +0000 Subject: fxp driver on freebsd 4.7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 14:47:44 -0000 Hi, all I tried to install a new intel 82550 based ethernet adapter on my freebsd 4.7. In the first time, I don't want to recompile my kernel. So, I add the following line to /boot/loader.conf: if_fxp_load="YES" The driver loaded and the adapter identified as fxp0. But the system reboot every time while I tried to run ifconfig on fxp0. Did I do anything wrong using loadable module? Or loadable module support not stable on this release. The second time, I compile fxp driver to my new kernel and every thing seem work ok. This 82550 adapter has 3des support bulletin, how can I identify this function enabled? I alread use link0 parameter on ifconfig to load microcode as manual page instructed. Thanks, Vincent Chen ----------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo!©_¼¯³y«¬ºëÆF ³Ì·sªº³y«¬ºëÆFñ¦WÀÉ¡AÅý«H¥ó¿W¨ã­Ó¤H¦â±m¡I http://tw.avatar.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 1 22:10:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE33E16A4CE for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:10:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay2-dav8.bay2.hotmail.com [65.54.246.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E4B43D45 for ; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:10:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zzerver@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:10:00 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 24.23.40.64 by BAY2-DAV8.phx.gbl with DAV; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:09:21 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [24.23.40.64] X-Originating-Email: [zzerver@hotmail.com] X-Sender: zzerver@hotmail.com From: "alex" To: Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:09:02 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jan 2005 22:10:00.0446 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2E839E0:01C4F04E] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:01:27 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Multiple OS one machine hda: hda1: windows, hda2: freeBSD, hda3: fat32 (emply), hda5: secundary on 4 Swap, Slackware Fedora more Linux, fdisk report up to 15 partitions, my configuration is ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:10:00 -0000 hda: 1 (win xp), 2 (freeBSD), 3 (DOS fat32 empty), 4 Extended < 5 first = ( linux OS all on / ), 6 ( second Linux OS on 7), .... 8, 9. 10. 12 >=20 hda2: freeBSD < BSD: 12 ( 12 linux, 13, 14, 15, 16> . now either GRUB or LILO can boot up to 5 OS either way, OS 6+ dont boot = with various KERNEL PANIC errors at the end, then try MBR on hda12 ( = SLACK) and try add more then 4 OS and nothing, soo ... fi i fdisk /mbr, = fdisk (create) hda1 , hda2, hda3, hda4 (extended), then create = 7,8,9,19,11,12,13,14,15 and install every one in it (with out any SWAP), = say 12 OS on it. Whats the steps to create a multiple operating systems on one computer?? thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 06:57:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F9516A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:57:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web21004.mail.yahoo.com (web21004.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5D5643D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 06:57:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ortega_wb@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 93810 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jan 2005 06:57:11 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=obBH2NWzAdWMReVOGbxElAqIS4rZXZgtXy3Yq7L2Y3R9nHYx/a5DkQDokSw6LDVTDtws+uKjwb9QQK16/P6/X+XX+aToyZrRr86hRJXy5njkde0l2GJwOC8Ijq7MSCHgZiOARDZaWO3L8QSAtQZmBDC5p3RQJIJoDVxS3b/iY5Y= ; Message-ID: <20050102065711.93808.qmail@web21004.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [210.213.181.153] by web21004.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 22:57:11 PST Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 22:57:11 -0800 (PST) From: ortega willy To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:04:11 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: just an inquiry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:57:12 -0000 i just like to know how i can be qualified to post a hardware request from your donors like i would like to have a replacement for my hard disk drive for my laptop. I am using my laptop for our church. I suspect ants "ate" the wire coat of my hard disk. I can't find replacement here in our country because i think my hard disk model is already phased out. Please help me i need a replacement. I live in the Philippines. Thanks Willy Ortega --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! – What will yours do? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:09:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92E716A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8A343D48 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:09:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5E169A3F; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:09:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:09:49 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Eric Kjeldergaard Message-Id: <20050102100949.6d0822d5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20041227083502.2d865466.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0rc (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ctodd@chrismiller.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: write state to swap for multi-os boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:09:51 -0000 Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > > > Has anyone considered or accomplished allowing FreeBSD to write it's > > > current state (including window manager, windows, etc) to swap and > > > allowing a subsequent reload of the system to last state? This would be > > > sort of like the sleep mode of a laptop, but would allow the user to boot > > > into another OS (like Winblows) briefly and then resume their FreeBSD > > > system state. I'd love to use FreeBSD as my primary desktop, but there may > > > be times where I'll need to boot into Windows for apps that don't run > > > under Wine. Since I tend to have a lot of application windows open, it's a > > > PITA to have to reload everything on boot. Thoughts? > > > > This isn't a direct answer to your question, but you might want to have > > a look at vmware. > > vmware and qemu (open source semi-alternative) are good ways to > accomplish booting Windows from inside of FreeBSD. Actually, not really, as I've been unable to make modern versions of VMWare work on FreeBSD. But it's a great way to boot Linux under Windows, or FreeBSD under either, or have multiple OSes running simultaneously under a single computer. > What you want, > however, is something that has been on the wishlist for a little while > now. Suspend-to-RAM has been around and works fine for a while, but > Suspend-to-disc (which Linux currently has) is yet to be written. > There have been suggestions of saving the RAM to swap space and > shutting down. I hope to see someone put this into action soon. It'd > be a great feature. (Especially for mobiles) I agree that it would be a great feature. I was just offering a potential alternative until it's written. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:22:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1E716A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:22:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA6143D53 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:22:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.daugherty@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so361871wra for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:22:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ciADdtH9DM0NavYtkLSjI1PwMuI4GC+LkzgkQKzPIz1Ka5onxLS/EmaKYx9EzwGIX+hCTCHfzWPnKR0zFFAhuj7hMme8St7mQghmfDT3rNnkYm8IaV5ULVqb117yTJM6GhwkBthjzp59G39L9i32m1oCZMrV/HLiYI4fptBTBWU= Received: by 10.54.42.3 with SMTP id p3mr180252wrp; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:22:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.28.46 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:22:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:22:41 -0500 From: David Daugherty To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: DNS problems - slow to resolve X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Daugherty List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:22:42 -0000 I'm running BIND 9 for my own DNS and I'm connecting to the Internet through cable modem. In my named.conf I have a forwarders section where I put the IPs for my ISPs DNS. Since my connection to the ISP is DHCP how can I determine the DNS IPs that have been assigned? I don't see it when man'ing ifconfig. Are there tools/commands I can use to determine the resolution time that my lookups are taking? A lot of my web browser requests are timing out (name lookups) and I have to keep hitting refresh until it finally resolves. -- Doc david.daugherty@gmail.com 317.536.1858 "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:24:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4735E16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:24:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51904.mail.yahoo.com (web51904.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0C5643D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:24:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kilton9@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 65567 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jan 2005 15:24:16 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=cNkEGZVKrSk26FYaJLvFRSPYzFcmTPPvgmvo4PzDtxsUtxRa4u84eE3Dkef+MG8gig9pYj8G5JP2Cw3XZoiBSoKk8S9DAVfQvrJRpYFEjJ1CB5IAWDFhfb1awIw1Drv8eePITGeMF9CmtdjXWaT3pk2moieDXOLZ1LBVzlXhHJI= ; Message-ID: <20050102152416.65565.qmail@web51904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.49.148.23] by web51904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:24:16 PST Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:24:16 -0800 (PST) From: James Kilton To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: TCPDUMP performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:24:18 -0000 Hello, We've installed some FreeBSD machines as Gigabit sniffers, and I'm wondering if there are any things I can tweak (e.g., buffer size) to help TCPDUMP capture better (we often see packets dropped by the kernel). Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks, James __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:24:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08FB16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:24:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E29243D3F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:24:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xinizul@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so16349wra for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:24:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=iS9U9SWWBjbZxtBDVapUOrGMxK4mNxMyQC6XljnRjXb/BdtEE+kn+vtRncYKh8YipgKAx1crcBdfMa5jo1WkspAUHSxgrVytWgSnGydaiNzqil/z68edbS+rkLl7/xmb5JARsENQ4+TOD9YlyGBGZ1FIdvz3R8IjEm0pZh37UYs= Received: by 10.54.18.52 with SMTP id 52mr172421wrr; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:24:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.22.20 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:24:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4d0730560501020724bb5e168@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:24:58 +0100 From: Xinizul Xinizul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41D7FB93.2020804@nbritton.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4d0730560501010721556089dc@mail.gmail.com> <4d073056050101083563c63c78@mail.gmail.com> <20050101164520.GC4745@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> <200501021416.44109.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> <41D7FB93.2020804@nbritton.org> Subject: Re: Please help: burncd errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Xinizul Xinizul List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:24:59 -0000 Thanks to all. Definetely I have to compile the kernel as suggested above with the atapicam entry. Now I'm burning succesfully with the cdrecord tool. Regards, Xinizul On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:48:03 -0600, Nikolas Britton wrote: > Fabian Keil wrote: > > > > >"Low speed == better quality" is a myth > > > > > why so? > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:31:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66C016A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:31:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5468B43D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:31:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F5C69A3F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:31:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:31:28 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050102103128.10f8b9d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20050102152416.65565.qmail@web51904.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050102152416.65565.qmail@web51904.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0rc (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: TCPDUMP performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:31:30 -0000 James Kilton wrote: > Hello, > > We've installed some FreeBSD machines as Gigabit sniffers, and I'm > wondering if there are any things I can tweak (e.g., buffer size) to help > TCPDUMP capture better (we often see packets dropped by the kernel). > > Any advice would be appreciated. When using tethereal to do captures, I found that nicing the capture process reduced the incidence of dropped packets to 0. Not exactly the same circumstance, but I would guess that tcpdump would respond simularly. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:33:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297C416A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:33:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sys18.mail.msu.edu (sys18.mail.msu.edu [35.9.75.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C5B43D31 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:33:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bushous2@msu.edu) Received: from [65.42.16.175] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by sys18.mail.msu.edu with esmtpsa (Exim 4.43 #1) (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) id 1Cl7j0-0002D1-GX; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:32:58 -0500 From: Micah Bushouse To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20050102093214.10d4b2e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <000001c4f09b$f67534d0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> <20050102093214.10d4b2e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:32:57 -0500 Message-Id: <1104679977.274.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus: None found by Clam AV cc: Victor Foulk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:33:05 -0000 > > "Victor Foulk" wrote: > [...] > "Bill Moran" wrote: [...] > However, in my experience, the most critical hardware choice is > the network cards themselves. Cheapo network cards will really > hurt performance under load. So toss the cheapo Realtek cards > into the trash and spend a little extra on an Intel or other name > brand card designed for a server. [...] Similarly to Mr. Foulk, I'm also in the market for a pair of NICs for a small organization's firewall/gateway (in this case using IPFilter). Per your plug for Intel, I'm browsing 3Com and Intel NICs right now on mwave.com. Intel 10/100 w 3DES - $63 http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec.hmx?scriteria=1562535 3Com 10/100 w 3DES - $92 http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec.hmx?scriteria=3387169 Why do you suppose that while the 3Com seems very similar to the Intel it costs $30 more? Perhaps because it specs more types of encryption than the Intel NIC? How would this hardware acceleration integrate w FreeBSD? Per some Linux binary compat (as both cards are compat w Linux kernel 2.2+)? Will the hardware encryption on these cards ever be useful in a firewall/gateway application? Sorry for all the questions and thanks for your time, -- Micah Bushouse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:34:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D174316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:34:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cms-stl.com (smtp.cms-stl.com [192.94.149.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F5B43D46 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:34:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from madden@cmsrtp.com) Message-ID: <41D8146C.8030708@cmsrtp.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:34:04 -0600 From: Michael Madden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Daugherty References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMS-Received: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:34:14 -0600, [192.168.2.2] (port=36488 helo=[192.168.2.2]) X-CMS-Authenticated-User: madden X-CMS-Archived: smtp.cms-stl.com X-CMS-Scanned: Sophos Anti-Virus X-CMS-Received: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:34:15 -0600, localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:46026 helo=lxmail.cms-stl.com) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: madden@cmsrtp.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on smtp.cms-stl.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: DNS problems - slow to resolve X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:34:16 -0000 David Daugherty wrote: > Are there tools/commands I can use to determine the resolution time > that my lookups are taking? A lot of my web browser requests are > timing out (name lookups) and I have to keep hitting refresh until it > finally resolves. > I'd try using dig: > dig www.freebsd.org At the end look for the query time: ;; Query time: 3 msec ;; WHEN: Sun Jan 2 09:33:07 2005 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 211 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:37:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA3416A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:37:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2A743D49 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:37:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9E689E8.dip.t-dialin.net [217.230.137.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2752E0EE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:37:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D8156D.8080003@incubus.de> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:38:21 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: named exits on SIGHUP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:37:51 -0000 Hi folks, when I kill -HUP named on 5.3 (BIND 9), it exits, instead of reloading, as stated in the manpage. Is this normal? I think it's rather impractical, since it prevents proper log rotation through newsyslog.conf (when using "file" logging in named.conf). It doesn't seem to matter if it's running chrooted or not. mkb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:41:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BA316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:41:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5867C43D39 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:41:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from twinmp (12-218-40-24.client.mchsi.com[12.218.40.24]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with ESMTP id <20050102154121m91000cpkke>; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:41:21 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Daugherty Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:41:20 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501020941.20794.josh@tcbug.org> Subject: Re: DNS problems - slow to resolve X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:41:22 -0000 On Sunday 02 January 2005 09:22, David Daugherty wrote: > I'm running BIND 9 for my own DNS and I'm connecting to the > Internet through cable modem. In my named.conf I have a forwarders > section where I put the IPs for my ISPs DNS. Since my connection to > the ISP is DHCP how can I determine the DNS IPs that have been > assigned? I don't see it when man'ing ifconfig. /etc/resolv.conf lists which nameservers your system is using. (Hope I didn't completely interpret your question) :-/ -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:49:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2796516A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:49:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CB243D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:49:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.daugherty@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so19475wra for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:49:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=HE0xp2d12hMEeTHmAAuQtfZAwST62D0nGfdUrsiq9s1a1KgCNj2pe1UOY0VdcdgNIfIBdOwhsBH/XmTufMSQZN/GTz1IHOSQ0dLbYXj9Df2Tg3uFXjdaUpDXRDRwhWfvds7grHWM8yEaV4P36RkwjXYNN9RoNqUdR59IUzFSiwM= Received: by 10.54.49.64 with SMTP id w64mr91416wrw; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:49:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.28.46 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:49:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:49:28 -0500 From: David Daugherty To: Josh Paetzel In-Reply-To: <200501020941.20794.josh@tcbug.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200501020941.20794.josh@tcbug.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS problems - slow to resolve X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Daugherty List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:49:29 -0000 The problem with resolv.conf is that it just puts insightbb.com in there. Doing a whois on insightbb.com gives a few DNS servers but none of them are any speedier lookups then the others. If I put the IP that insightbb.com resolves to it's still slow. On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:41:20 -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Sunday 02 January 2005 09:22, David Daugherty wrote: > > I'm running BIND 9 for my own DNS and I'm connecting to the > > Internet through cable modem. In my named.conf I have a forwarders > > section where I put the IPs for my ISPs DNS. Since my connection to > > the ISP is DHCP how can I determine the DNS IPs that have been > > assigned? I don't see it when man'ing ifconfig. > > /etc/resolv.conf lists which nameservers your system is using. > > (Hope I didn't completely interpret your question) :-/ > > -- > Thanks, > > Josh Paetzel > -- Doc david.daugherty@gmail.com 317.536.1858 "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:52:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0963116A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:52:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE1843D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:52:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.daugherty@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so363004wra for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:52:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=X4Y781sRbGNUadBw02aToPMiLbLKpkYfvs750nkCNbYKCI86xxu17poSENjY1z5HU0Ga+1DQLGcSF7RO7Lb3pVPXnbql5+Mm++LuKcKv8ExSOXdSqdENTxJfo011Kz3dNYTNkHzBNOsLee1nqJIqpxlDpaYERnvuCnsp5DL5/Uw= Received: by 10.54.42.3 with SMTP id p3mr187580wrp; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:52:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.28.46 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:52:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:52:14 -0500 From: David Daugherty To: Josh Paetzel In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200501020941.20794.josh@tcbug.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS problems - slow to resolve X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Daugherty List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:52:15 -0000 Ah, yes..dig. Forgot that it had a resolve time in there. Here's a perfect example of the slowness I'm talking about: su-2.05b# dig yahoo.com ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> yahoo.com ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend: Operation timed out su-2.05b# dig yahoo.com ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> yahoo.com ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 1563 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; yahoo.com, type = A, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: yahoo.com. 5M IN A 216.109.112.135 yahoo.com. 5M IN A 66.94.234.13 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns2.yahoo.com. yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns3.yahoo.com. yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns4.yahoo.com. yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns5.yahoo.com. yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns1.yahoo.com. ;; Total query time: 6179 msec ;; FROM: datasphereweb.com to SERVER: 127.0.0.1 ;; WHEN: Sun Jan 2 09:55:17 2005 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 27 rcvd: 149 First one didn't resolve in time. Second one, 6 seconds!!! On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:49:28 -0500, David Daugherty wrote: > The problem with resolv.conf is that it just puts insightbb.com in > there. Doing a whois on insightbb.com gives a few DNS servers but none > of them are any speedier lookups then the others. If I put the IP that > insightbb.com resolves to it's still slow. > > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:41:20 -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > On Sunday 02 January 2005 09:22, David Daugherty wrote: > > > I'm running BIND 9 for my own DNS and I'm connecting to the > > > Internet through cable modem. In my named.conf I have a forwarders > > > section where I put the IPs for my ISPs DNS. Since my connection to > > > the ISP is DHCP how can I determine the DNS IPs that have been > > > assigned? I don't see it when man'ing ifconfig. > > > > /etc/resolv.conf lists which nameservers your system is using. > > > > (Hope I didn't completely interpret your question) :-/ > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > > > Josh Paetzel > > > > -- > Doc > > david.daugherty@gmail.com > 317.536.1858 > > "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do > nothing." > - Edmund Burke > -- Doc david.daugherty@gmail.com 317.536.1858 "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:57:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE93316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:57:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53609.mail.yahoo.com (web53609.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D37C43D46 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:57:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flexble2547@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 92262 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jan 2005 15:57:01 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=EV/bsFQvVMPq8V3jB6kHk5woBeSYXSiG+M2/i88YS6j0kf1rOJcsJKC+5mTyas8Wz/o/JCwjXm+wgKUxe4NF4aT4zBEN7KDDMlWUlWyaSx44veinHgP1tbHf6eX8UqKBM5kYMKvEGCQbtUOwXbh5A4xjhCzQtSS34/sJjgoGaV0= ; Message-ID: <20050102155701.92260.qmail@web53609.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.100.166.16] by web53609.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 07:57:01 PST Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:57:01 -0800 (PST) From: scott renna To: Alexei Stukov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6db264520412311532671943de@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Device timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:57:02 -0000 I get a similar error for ath0, which is my wireless card. inexplicably, I'll get ath0: device timeout for some unknown reason. Have not seen this with wired ethernet cards, only this wireless one. --- Alexei Stukov wrote: > Hi, > > After a reinstalltion of FreeBSD 5.3, I get the > following error : > > nv0 : Device timout > > That NIC is on-board and the motherboard is a > brand-new ASUS SK8N. > Everything worked fine until I reinstalled. > > Any ideas about how to fix this? > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 15:57:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A303E16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:57:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net (ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net [166.102.165.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D999543D4C for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:57:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trey@fastmail.fm) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [69.40.74.131]) by ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net with ESMTP <20050102155731.ZRYJ10027.ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net@[192.168.0.2]> for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:57:31 -0600 From: Trey Sizemore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:59:05 -0500 Message-Id: <1104681545.860.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Do I need atapicam? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:57:32 -0000 I'm running 5.3-RELEASE and want to use k3b for CD burning. I have an IDE CD burner and IDE DVD drive. Do I need to have atapicam loaded in the kernel? Has this been depricated in 5.3? I notice the following in my GENERIC kernel config: salamander# cat /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC | grep atapi device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives device atapist # ATAPI tape drives And trying to load atapicam results in: salamander# kldload atapicam kldload: can't load atapicam: No such file or directory Do I need to add a line for atapicam in my GENERIC file and rebuild the kernel? Thanks. -- Cheers, Trey --- "This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it." -- Dorothy Parker 10:58AM up 18:11, 0 users, load averages: 0.09, 0.08, 0.07 FreeBSD salamander.thesizemores.net 5.3-RELEASE i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 16:02:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CF116A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:02:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACCE43D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:02:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from bsdbox.farid-hajji.net (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBA34B6E8; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:02:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:02:42 +0100 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: Trey Sizemore Message-ID: <20050102160242.GB2135@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> References: <1104681545.860.3.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1104681545.860.3.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do I need atapicam? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:02:15 -0000 On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:59:05AM -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote: > I'm running 5.3-RELEASE and want to use k3b for CD burning. I have an > IDE CD burner and IDE DVD drive. Do I need to have atapicam loaded in > the kernel? Has this been depricated in 5.3? I notice the following in > my GENERIC kernel config: > > [snip] > > Do I need to add a line for atapicam in my GENERIC file and rebuild the > kernel? Yes. You can't kldload atapicam. You need a 'device atapicam' line in your kernel config file, then rebuild, install and reboot the kernel. > Cheers, > Trey Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 16:28:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A404316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:28:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0C543D31 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:28:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.daugherty@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so364497wra for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 08:28:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ueyqv1HgwctSf9ZRWefB4wGSonFJIJ41P/e+B5JhvvJ54Wgg7fK7QCksndqF5ARdlFVK+Lx64v0HWll/jXM58Gsp37EYu6MiMxOido/PZUuQ6em5am9wm7ES3N/I5asa9Dh0+3dCSQ62CYYlkckizfW832c2yJe2YnWW96ZsFjY= Received: by 10.54.29.64 with SMTP id c64mr293168wrc; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 08:28:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.28.46 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:28:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:28:27 -0500 From: David Daugherty To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200501020941.20794.josh@tcbug.org> Subject: Re: DNS problems - slow to resolve X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Daugherty List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:28:28 -0000 Ok, I wasn't getting the IPs in my resolv.conf because I had dhclient.conf modified to supersede to the local DNS. Here's what I did to determine the DNS that my ISP was assigning me. I changed the dhclient.conf back to empty and restarted the network. This then put the IPs of the two DNS servers assigned into my resolv.conf. I then took these two IPs and added them to my forwarders section in my named.conf. Rebooted and name lookup is much faster now. It only took my wife grumping about having to hit refresh 20+ times to bring up a web page in order for me to fix this since we've moved and changed ISPs. Thanks for the ideas everyone. On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:52:14 -0500, David Daugherty wrote: > Ah, yes..dig. Forgot that it had a resolve time in there. > > Here's a perfect example of the slowness I'm talking about: > su-2.05b# dig yahoo.com > > ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> yahoo.com > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > ;; res_nsend: Operation timed out > su-2.05b# dig yahoo.com > > ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> yahoo.com > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > ;; got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 1563 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 0 > ;; QUERY SECTION: > ;; yahoo.com, type = A, class = IN > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > yahoo.com. 5M IN A 216.109.112.135 > yahoo.com. 5M IN A 66.94.234.13 > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns2.yahoo.com. > yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns3.yahoo.com. > yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns4.yahoo.com. > yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns5.yahoo.com. > yahoo.com. 1d6h52m8s IN NS ns1.yahoo.com. > > ;; Total query time: 6179 msec > ;; FROM: datasphereweb.com to SERVER: 127.0.0.1 > ;; WHEN: Sun Jan 2 09:55:17 2005 > ;; MSG SIZE sent: 27 rcvd: 149 > > First one didn't resolve in time. Second one, 6 seconds!!! > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:49:28 -0500, David Daugherty > wrote: > > The problem with resolv.conf is that it just puts insightbb.com in > > there. Doing a whois on insightbb.com gives a few DNS servers but none > > of them are any speedier lookups then the others. If I put the IP that > > insightbb.com resolves to it's still slow. > > > > > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:41:20 -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > > On Sunday 02 January 2005 09:22, David Daugherty wrote: > > > > I'm running BIND 9 for my own DNS and I'm connecting to the > > > > Internet through cable modem. In my named.conf I have a forwarders > > > > section where I put the IPs for my ISPs DNS. Since my connection to > > > > the ISP is DHCP how can I determine the DNS IPs that have been > > > > assigned? I don't see it when man'ing ifconfig. > > > > > > /etc/resolv.conf lists which nameservers your system is using. > > > > > > (Hope I didn't completely interpret your question) :-/ > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Josh Paetzel > > > > > > > -- > > Doc > > > > david.daugherty@gmail.com > > 317.536.1858 > > > > "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do > > nothing." > > - Edmund Burke > > > > -- > Doc > > david.daugherty@gmail.com > 317.536.1858 > > "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do > nothing." > - Edmund Burke > -- Doc david.daugherty@gmail.com 317.536.1858 "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 16:54:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A34616A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:54:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91.asp.att.net [63.240.76.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4EA43D46 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:54:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nbritton.org) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (12-223-129-46.client.insightbb.com[12.223.129.46]) by sccimhc91.asp.att.net (sccimhc91) with ESMTP id <20050102165449i9100rfogqe>; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:54:50 +0000 Message-ID: <41D82758.4010709@nbritton.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:54:48 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Micah Bushouse References: <000001c4f09b$f67534d0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> <20050102093214.10d4b2e1.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <1104679977.274.25.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1104679977.274.25.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: Victor Foulk cc: Bill Moran cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:54:51 -0000 Micah Bushouse wrote: >>>"Victor Foulk" wrote: >>> >>> >>[...] >>"Bill Moran" wrote: >> >> >[...] > > >>However, in my experience, the most critical hardware choice is >>the network cards themselves. Cheapo network cards will really >>hurt performance under load. So toss the cheapo Realtek cards >>into the trash and spend a little extra on an Intel or other name >>brand card designed for a server. >> >> >[...] > >Similarly to Mr. Foulk, I'm also in the market for a pair of NICs for a >small organization's firewall/gateway (in this case using IPFilter). > >Per your plug for Intel, I'm browsing 3Com and Intel NICs right now on >mwave.com. > >Intel 10/100 w 3DES - $63 >http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec.hmx?scriteria=1562535 >3Com 10/100 w 3DES - $92 >http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec.hmx?scriteria=3387169 > >Why do you suppose that while the 3Com seems very similar to the Intel >it costs $30 more? Perhaps because it specs more types of encryption >than the Intel NIC? > >How would this hardware acceleration integrate w FreeBSD? Per some Linux >binary compat (as both cards are compat w Linux kernel 2.2+)? > >Will the hardware encryption on these cards ever be useful in a >firewall/gateway application? > >Sorry for all the questions and thanks for your time, > > $92 -$63 ------- $29=Branding? --------------------------------------------------------------- INTEL PRO 100S, Model PILA8460C3 Specifications: Standard: 802.2, 802.3, 802.3u, 802.3x, 802.1p/Q Encryption: DES(56bit)/3DES(168bit) On-board Memory: 18KB Special Features: Integrated security co-processor, Advanced management for lower support costs, intel® SingleDriver™ technology simplifies installation and maintenance $27@newegg.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 16:56:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A6D16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:56:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.frm2.tum.de (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5CE43D39 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:56:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from localhost (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j02Gu9H1001433; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:56:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (hades.admin.frm2 [172.25.1.10]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j02Gu7Xa001429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:56:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j02Gu7P9000766; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:56:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: (from jpulz@localhost) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j02Gu7AW000765; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:56:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:56:03 +0100 (CET) From: Joerg Pulz To: Matthias Buelow In-Reply-To: <41D8156D.8080003@incubus.de> Message-ID: <20050102174445.E714@hades.admin.frm2> References: <41D8156D.8080003@incubus.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: at mailhost.frm2.tum.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named exits on SIGHUP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:56:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Hi folks, > > when I kill -HUP named on 5.3 (BIND 9), it exits, instead of reloading, as > stated in the manpage. Is this normal? I think it's rather impractical, > since it prevents proper log rotation through newsyslog.conf (when using > "file" logging in named.conf). It doesn't seem to matter if it's running > chrooted or not. i noticed the same behavior. it did not exit if named is running in foreground, started with "-f". it's also impractical as '/etc/rc.d/named' is using the HUP signal for the reload command which causes the process to exit silently. the named(8) manpage says in the SIGNAL section: [snip] In routine operation, signals should not be used to control the name- server; rndc(8) should be used instead. [snip] i tried 'rndc reload' and it's working and did not cause the named process to exit. maybe '/etc/rc.d/named' should be changed to use this as reload command. i have not looked deeper into this because my spare time is currently very limited. regards Joerg - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2CenSPOsGF+KA+MRAuu2AJ9cS1wJIhYw3SyhqQyjVy5EP5e1YACglMWt dMpKdIEqWEVjAB6CF7BoVbw= =4lP4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 17:08:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7D616A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:08:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9912D43D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:08:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from BARTON (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.rr.com [65.184.201.54]) j02H8Okc010899 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:08:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:13:31 +0000 From: jason henson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1104646349l.81772l.0l@BARTON> <1104647486l.81835l.0l@BARTON> <1104648686l.81943l.0l@BARTON> In-Reply-To: <1104648686l.81943l.0l@BARTON> (from jason@ec.rr.com on Sun Jan 2 01:51:26 2005) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.2.6 Message-Id: <1104686011l.85254l.0l@BARTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: buildworld fails with sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:08:28 -0000 > I think I got it! Some more searching revealed a comman problem with =20 > the standard refuse file having src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc* in it. =20 > Hopifully this will solve the problem. >=20 > Thanks for the help, > Keep up the good work. > Nope, it still is not working. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 17:19:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AAA16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:19:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5C043D4C for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:19:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9E689E8.dip.t-dialin.net [217.230.137.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA9C2E86E; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:19:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D82D41.7030101@incubus.de> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:20:01 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Pulz References: <41D8156D.8080003@incubus.de> <20050102174445.E714@hades.admin.frm2> In-Reply-To: <20050102174445.E714@hades.admin.frm2> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named exits on SIGHUP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:19:37 -0000 Joerg Pulz wrote: > i tried 'rndc reload' and it's working and did not cause the named > process to exit. maybe '/etc/rc.d/named' should be changed to use this > as reload command. Yes, this works here also. In the long run, it would probably be a good idea to make newsyslog understand arbitrary commands for restarting, instead of just sending a signal. mkb. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 17:26:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB1A16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:26:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [217.122.132.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB7743D39 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:26:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:26:22 +0100 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:26:22 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050102172622.GA14958@nagual.st> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: dick hoogendijk Subject: Re: Multiple OS one machine hda: hda1: windows, hda2: freeBSD, hda3: fat32 (emply), hda5: secundary on 4 Swap, Slackware Fedora more Linux, fdisk report up to 15 partitions, my configuration is ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:26:24 -0000 On 01 Jan alex wrote: > Whats the steps to create a multiple operating systems on one > computer?? thanks. Install GAG (do a google search on it). Piece of cake ;-) -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.10 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 17:45:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AFE16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:45:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C45943D58 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:45:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stukov25@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so430729rne for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:45:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=OMEU++4Bc4DE4gM15MGZb+YuHDuGfGhKg3QhoIpR2l9CzDYLq9J/OWqKuRBIVI2B3B5rF8s7If1vk+EehYBH2JotM/fimCWfYkprxsguAoXfYjcK98c7UphOzEMVeoDXO0dJB+YfEg52XA0Kb/gwnsrfJRgdJ9wj1KQBGLEap/w= Received: by 10.38.4.61 with SMTP id 61mr162103rnd; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:45:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.98.69 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 09:45:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6db264520501020945157613e7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:45:48 -0500 From: Alexei Stukov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050102155701.92260.qmail@web53609.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6db264520412311532671943de@mail.gmail.com> <20050102155701.92260.qmail@web53609.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Device timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexei Stukov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:45:55 -0000 And have you found the way to fix it? It may be the same issue for both of our NICs. Thanks. On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 07:57:01 -0800 (PST), scott renna wrote: > I get a similar error for ath0, which is my wireless > card. inexplicably, I'll get ath0: device timeout for > some unknown reason. Have not seen this with wired > ethernet cards, only this wireless one. > > > --- Alexei Stukov wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > After a reinstalltion of FreeBSD 5.3, I get the > > following error : > > > > nv0 : Device timout > > > > That NIC is on-board and the motherboard is a > > brand-new ASUS SK8N. > > Everything worked fine until I reinstalled. > > > > Any ideas about how to fix this? > > > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 17:48:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2451816A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:48:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C1D43D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:48:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from BARTON (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.rr.com [65.184.201.54]) j02HmAkc028684 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:48:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:53:17 +0000 From: jason henson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1104646349l.81772l.0l@BARTON> <1104647486l.81835l.0l@BARTON> <1104648686l.81943l.0l@BARTON> <1104686011l.85254l.0l@BARTON> In-Reply-To: <1104686011l.85254l.0l@BARTON> (from jason@ec.rr.com on Sun Jan 2 12:13:31 2005) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.2.6 Message-Id: <1104688397l.85406l.0l@BARTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: buildworld fails with sendmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:48:13 -0000 On 01/02/05 12:13:31, jason henson wrote: >=20 >> I think I got it! Some more searching revealed a comman problem =20 >> with the standard refuse file having src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc* in =20 >> it. Hopifully this will solve the problem. >>=20 >> Thanks for the help, >> Keep up the good work. >> > Nope, it still is not working. > Now I found out that http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/etc/=20 sendmail/ has different files and some files I don't. I was using =20 cvsup4.FreeBSD.org but I am switching to another. =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 18:09:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA1016A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:09:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9592843D39 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:09:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9E689E8.dip.t-dialin.net [217.230.137.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A572E68F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:09:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D838DF.4090106@incubus.de> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:09:35 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050102091914.3D0B9114F1@mail.cypherpunks.to> <20050102101309.GA72018@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050102101309.GA72018@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: kern.maxfiles formula? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:09:05 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > A truly enormous number :-) You just need to increase the value of > kern.maxfiles in /boot/loader.conf as appropriate for your workload. would it be possible to make this dynamically allocated in the future? imho, such limits are a bit anachronistic. mkb. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 18:11:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E189D16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:11:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4A143D3F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:11:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.208.152] (port=3233 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp id 1ClACc-000Mtg-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:11:42 +0300 Message-ID: <41D8395E.4020803@mail.ru> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:11:42 +0300 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected Subject: basic freebsd programming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:11:44 -0000 Hello and Happy New Year! I need to write some very basic C programs under FreeBSD. I am new to Unix programming and not very good at C programming either, so I'm looking for documentation on some topics. The ones that are the most interesting for me now is how to write small daemons best and how to read ipfw info from a program. Man pages help me very much, but I really need some guide. The problem is that doc project doesn't seem to have released anything like it. I looked through dev-, arch-, porters- handbooks, read design-44bsd - but I didn't find what I want. Of course I can refresh my C skills and gain some Unix-coding knowledge by reading a couple' thousand pages, but I don't feel like it's necessary for what I want to write - just a basic statistics collector. Should I explore FreeBSD source code or is there some solid piece of documentation? Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 18:21:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327FB16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:21:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53807.mail.yahoo.com (web53807.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B625A43D4C for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:21:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stigmata_blackangel@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 31958 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jan 2005 18:21:50 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=HIhx26QS34M1e/xoDw1xAO6Wi5csTYt8LHPQXBOLpqd+rTaBIVxYCi5FU+rC3d0B0j1d/EkHoRDZt8h6K4RDPF91yQXAeFiycgkblWG7oAazQSVb8rpa/rlPKk7FvxmYJUiUhBENUAzEZOC8PybogZuvwdQ5H4rK1xfc418dqZI= ; Message-ID: <20050102182150.31956.qmail@web53807.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.9.155.250] by web53807.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:21:50 PST Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 10:21:50 -0800 (PST) From: Gregor Mosheh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: 4.10, USB problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:21:51 -0000 For several months I've been using an external USB hard drive, under 4.10 and the EHCI driver. It's worked perfectly for months. As of a month ago, when I swapped the drive for another one, the drive has not worked properly. A few days ago, my employer went on-site (the server is colocated) to swap the drive. The new drive had the same problem, and rebooting the server did not correct the problem. It was also reported that the last time he unplugged the drive (the fs on the drive was not mounted) the system crashed; he has since not plugged in the drive. Now the details... dmesg shows that it found a mass storage device and properly identifies it, and usbdevs also reports the drive; however, attempting to mount the drive causes "mount: /dev/da0s1e: Device not configured" and the message "umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT" appears in the dmesg. The external drive uses device usb4, since usb0 through usb3 are reported as USB1. It was suggested that having both the USB1 (uhci) and USB2 (ehci) driver may be causing confusion in the kernel. I find this unlikely, though, since it's been working for months. Any thoughts or troubleshooting tips? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 18:31:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCFE16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:31:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3A743D46 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:31:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (c-66-41-157-209.mn.client2.attbi.com [66.41.157.209]) (authenticated bits=0)j02IVcr7000772; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:31:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--318039723" Message-Id: <885A6A8E-5CEC-11D9-B92F-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:31:35 -0600 To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on grog.secure-computing.net cc: FreeBSD-Questions cc: Sergei Gnezdov Subject: Re: News from several NNTP Servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:31:47 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1--318039723 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Are the servers listed going to allow me to pull all those feeds? On Jan 1, 2005, at 10:24 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > open nntp server list _______________________________________________________ Eric F Crist "I am so smart, S.M.R.T!" Secure Computing Networks -Homer J Simpson --Apple-Mail-1--318039723 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkHYPggACgkQRAAY9knOW+rQ6gCghES+fCr8+7ghFBU9HHK0k/Wc H7sAniUpocJqj5lAd6BpUZDq2IrMLUXh =gnTo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-1--318039723-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 18:34:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE13516A513 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:34:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260C343D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:34:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (c-66-41-157-209.mn.client2.attbi.com [66.41.157.209]) (authenticated bits=0)j02IXwDB000795; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:33:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: References: <1677AECA-5C22-11D9-A9DC-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <5DBAA87E-5C4C-11D9-952C-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-2--317898991" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:33:56 -0600 To: Timothy Luoma X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on grog.secure-computing.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sharing printers with Mac - Rendezvous? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:34:05 -0000 --Apple-Mail-2--317898991 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Jan 1, 2005, at 11:19 PM, Timothy Luoma wrote: > > On Jan 1, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Eric F Crist wrote: > >> I would recommend setting up the lpd daemon. This is supported by Mac >> OS X be default, so there's not a whole lot to setup. No Rendevous >> necessary. > > Thanks Eric. I'll try that. I was thinking Rendezvous would be > easier than setting up lpd, but I might be wrong. I'm not even sure > that my printers (Brother 1240 and HP Deskjet something) support > Rendezvous or how it works. > > TjL No problem. If that Brother 1240 is a b/w laser, you're going to need to setup apsfilter first. Then just make that printer accessible from the rest of the network. The other thing you *could* do is purchase a network print server. I got one off eBay for about $40 from Zero One Technologies 01tech.com (that's a zero-one). A little difficult to setup at first, but works great! HTH _______________________________________________________ Eric F Crist "I am so smart, S.M.R.T!" Secure Computing Networks -Homer J Simpson --Apple-Mail-2--317898991 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkHYPpQACgkQRAAY9knOW+qgFQCbB+WiWdypeVzABDA9mQsjltqb /2QAoIccEXvwPaCTHx83fg6/h3IZSxvm =bFpe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-2--317898991-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 19:04:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337C416A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:04:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53803.mail.yahoo.com (web53803.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBF5943D58 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:04:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stigmata_blackangel@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 741 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jan 2005 19:04:51 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=c5cm0cirzHV+9rVSqz/3BWdp3qByxMyw7FejjPIWLVA5ZTze6oKWNZMbkbNKJRJW+cuazOkpfGEUndljBgFrnE00Q0tAPHYpDEYpMJpfl8z1SdtcJl5Zo7457BLUfAgVu7wggaoiMjIjD1Qkl5a+lMv3M48NQnLXnaFHZ/E5Jnc= ; Message-ID: <20050102190451.739.qmail@web53803.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.9.155.250] by web53803.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 11:04:51 PST Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:04:51 -0800 (PST) From: Gregor Mosheh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: smbfs module + securelevel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:04:52 -0000 I am trying to mount a SMB share in the usual fashion: mount -t smbfs //user@host/share /mnt And in response I get this: smbfs: vfsload(smbfs): Operation not permitted I am running at securelevel 1, so it would make sense if that were why I'm not allowed to load the module. My question is: How do I have this module loaded during the boot process, before the securelevel is set? Is there a rc.conf variable to set? Or is mentioning this smbfs share in the fstab sufficient? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 19:26:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829FB16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:26:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA7C43D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:26:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (schlepper [212.12.50.230]) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id j02JQG5Q086540; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:26:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) In-Reply-To: <20050102190451.739.qmail@web53803.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050102190451.739.qmail@web53803.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <2B9804D8-5CF4-11D9-8D31-000A95C893E4@lassitu.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Bethke Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:26:15 +0100 To: Gregor Mosheh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs module + securelevel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:26:21 -0000 Am 02.01.2005 um 20:04 schrieb Gregor Mosheh: > I am trying to mount a SMB share in the usual fashion: > mount -t smbfs //user@host/share /mnt > > And in response I get this: > smbfs: vfsload(smbfs): Operation not permitted > > I am running at securelevel 1, so it would make sense > if that were why I'm not allowed to load the module. > My question is: How do I have this module loaded > during the boot process, before the securelevel is > set? Is there a rc.conf variable to set? Or is > mentioning this smbfs share in the fstab sufficient? To make sure a module is loaded, add a line to /boot/loader.conf: smbfs_load="YES" I believe that you also might need to load libiconf.ko, if it isn't pulled in automatically when loading smbfs: libiconf_load="YES" HTH, Stefan -- Stefan Bethke Fon +49 170 346 0140 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 19:36:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B1216A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:36:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay21-f42.bay21.hotmail.com [65.54.233.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A34143D39 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:36:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from unixtools@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:36:00 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 202.68.141.227 by by21fd.bay21.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:35:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [202.68.141.227] X-Originating-Email: [unixtools@hotmail.com] X-Sender: unixtools@hotmail.com From: "Sunil Sunder Raj" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:05:26 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jan 2005 19:36:00.0855 (UTC) FILETIME=[4A184670:01C4F102] Subject: Freebsd remote install howto X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:36:01 -0000 Hi, Had to install freebsd on a machine without a floppy disk nor a cd drive. This machine is on the lan. Is there any way I can install freebsd from another freebsd machine in the lan. Regards SSR _________________________________________________________________ Redefine team work. Discover your true potential. http://www.microsoft.com/india/office/experience/ With the MS product suite. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 19:45:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF5116A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:45:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE0543D45 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:45:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from bsdbox.farid-hajji.net (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B464AC75; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:45:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:45:39 +0100 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: "Andrew P." Message-ID: <20050102194539.GG2583@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> References: <41D8395E.4020803@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41D8395E.4020803@mail.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: basic freebsd programming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:45:12 -0000 On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:11:42PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote: > The ones that are the most interesting for me now is how to > write small daemons best and how to read ipfw info from a program. > > Of course I can refresh my C skills and gain some Unix-coding knowledge > by reading a couple' thousand pages, but I don't feel like it's > necessary for what I want to write - just a basic statistics collector. Of course you could do that in C, but if all you need is a program that reads the output of other programs, and presents stats on some port as a daemon (and a client to read that out), why not just go for a scripted solution in Perl or Python? Both languages are much better than C when it comes to parsing strings, and they are very good at networking too. IMHO, the only reason (besides efficiency) to write a monitoring program in C is if you don't want (or can't afford) to install a perl or python interpreter on the nodes that you want to monitor. > Should I explore FreeBSD source code or is there some solid piece of > documentation? That's not necessary. If you want to write that in C, you'll have to familiarize yourself with the popen(3) call for executing a program and capturing its output. Then you need a few string processing functions like str*(3) sscanf() etc... to parse the output (that's the tricky part). Finally you will need a small example of a client and server in C that uses the sockets API (that's pretty generic and not FreeBSD-specific at all, just google for it). Combine all this and voila, you've got your nice monitoring app in C. Alternatively, you could extract the info directly from the kernel by performing exactly the same steps that your utility program (ipfw...) does, but it's overkill for such a simple app. But again, consider giving Python a try. It's well worth it for such basic tasks. > Best wishes, > Andrew P. Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 19:56:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C5B16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:56:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53808.mail.yahoo.com (web53808.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B468043D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:56:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stigmata_blackangel@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 61109 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jan 2005 19:56:13 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=FFAHKOP6OAFMl1lbGZjBWHBQPfijIcsIonb6NFGh94Tr+hmnAtlglEH3A9X28P32FtqfOvcKOmpAstb133eMZtkeNYEAiRc6HoEeBWaz9+Fw2yfn0TaAazIBgncUSa7snry08lGPrT+nIA+U3Yxu2vhZh391dJW1Z82yNt/UVLE= ; Message-ID: <20050102195613.61107.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.9.155.250] by web53808.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 11:56:13 PST Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:56:13 -0800 (PST) From: Gregor Mosheh To: Stefan Bethke In-Reply-To: <2B9804D8-5CF4-11D9-8D31-000A95C893E4@lassitu.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs module + securelevel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:56:14 -0000 Viel danke, Stefan! --- Stefan Bethke wrote: > Am 02.01.2005 um 20:04 schrieb Gregor Mosheh: > > > I am trying to mount a SMB share in the usual > fashion: > > mount -t smbfs //user@host/share /mnt > > > > And in response I get this: > > smbfs: vfsload(smbfs): Operation not permitted > > > > I am running at securelevel 1, so it would make > sense > > if that were why I'm not allowed to load the > module. > > My question is: How do I have this module loaded > > during the boot process, before the securelevel is > > set? Is there a rc.conf variable to set? Or is > > mentioning this smbfs share in the fstab > sufficient? > > To make sure a module is loaded, add a line to > /boot/loader.conf: > > smbfs_load="YES" > > I believe that you also might need to load > libiconf.ko, if it isn't > pulled in automatically when loading smbfs: > > libiconf_load="YES" > > > HTH, > Stefan > > -- > Stefan Bethke Fon +49 170 346 > 0140 > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 19:56:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F9D16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:56:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AE843D49 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:56:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from bsdbox.farid-hajji.net (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED4D4AC75; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:57:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:57:10 +0100 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: Sunil Sunder Raj Message-ID: <20050102195710.GH2583@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd remote install howto X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:56:42 -0000 On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:05:26AM +0530, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote: > Hi, > Had to install freebsd on a machine without a floppy disk nor a cd drive. > This machine is on the lan. Is there any way I can install freebsd from > another freebsd machine in the lan. You could try a pxeboot(8)-based method, if your machine supports PXE: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2004/09/09/diskless_server.html I've done something similar to install FreeBSD 5.2.1 on a Soekris net4801 board that comes without keyboard, floppy drives, CD drives, nor VGA; just a serial console and ethernet ports. It was amazingly simple and effective. Good luck! > Regards > SSR Cheers, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:11:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF6D16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:11:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net (ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net [166.102.165.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3990A43D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:11:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trey@fastmail.fm) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [69.40.74.131]) by ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net with ESMTP <20050102201142.DBAZ10027.ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net@[192.168.0.2]> for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:11:42 -0600 From: Trey Sizemore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:13:12 -0500 Message-Id: <1104696792.806.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Why might my USB devices be detected? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:11:43 -0000 My USB devices are not being detected on my tower. I'm running 5.3-STABLE and have the following in my /etc/rc.conf: ________________________________________________________________ salamander# cat /etc/rc.conf # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Mon Dec 6 13:36:23 2004 # Created: Mon Dec 6 13:36:23 2004 # Enable network daemons for user convenience. # Please make all changes to this file, not to /etc/defaults/rc.conf. # This file now contains just the overrides from /etc/defaults/rc.conf. hostname="salamander.thesizemores.net" ifconfig_vr0="DHCP" linux_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="YES" sendmail_flags="-bd" sendmail_pidfile="/var/spool/postfix/pid/master.pid" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" devfs_system_ruleset="local_ruleset" ________________________________________________________________ and this in a /etc/devfs.rules file that I created per another post I saw on the forum: ________________________________________________________________ [local_ruleset=10] add path 'ugen*' mode 664 ________________________________________________________________ The following lines appear in my /sys/i386/conf/GENERIC file (this is out-of-the-box, I have not recompiled the kernel since initial install): ________________________________________________________________ # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices device ugen # Generic device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player device uscanner # Scanners # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) device ch # SCSI media changers device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) ________________________________________________________________ However, when I connect my camera via the USB connector (or via a SanDisk card reader) and turn it on, I get no messages in dmesg and usbdevs shows ________________________________________________________________ salamander# usbdevs addr 1: UHCI root hub, VIA addr 1: UHCI root hub, VIA addr 1: UHCI root hub, VIA ________________________________________________________________ I also have an Epson Stylus C84 printer connected directly to one of the box's USB ports and it doesn't appear either. I have PNP turned off in the BIOS. What else could I check? These ports were working as recently as a month ago with a Linux flavor installed. Thanks. -- Cheers, Trey --- Humor is the only test of gravity, and gravity of humor; for a subject which will not bear raillery is suspicious, and a jest which will not bear serious examination is false wit. -- Aristotle 3:06PM up 1:15, 0 users, load averages: 0.01, 0.02, 0.00 FreeBSD salamander.thesizemores.net 5.3-STABLE i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:20:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659DA16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:20:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cms-stl.com (smtp.cms-stl.com [192.94.149.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184FE43D49 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:20:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from madden@cms-stl.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:20:51 -0600 From: Michael Madden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-CMS-Received: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:20:52 -0600, linus.cms-stl.com ([172.16.25.70]:38776) X-CMS-Archived: smtp.cms-stl.com X-CMS-Scanned: Sophos Anti-Virus X-CMS-Received: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:20:52 -0600, localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:50236 helo=lxmail.cms-stl.com) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: madden@cms-stl.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on smtp.cms-stl.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:20:53 -0000 I'm looking to setup a mail server with FreeBSD 5.3 for a group of around 100 users, and I was wondering which MTA I should use. I have noticed sendmail is the default MTA, but I have no sendmail experience. Also I know historically sendmail has had some serious security issues. Furthermore, can someone recommend a decent POP3 and IMAP server? Thanks in advance, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:24:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB69C16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:24:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B679B43D53 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:24:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068C769A3F; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:24:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:24:52 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Michael Madden Message-Id: <20050102152452.1eaf556a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0rc (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:24:54 -0000 Michael Madden wrote: > I'm looking to setup a mail server with FreeBSD 5.3 for a group of around > 100 users, and I was wondering which MTA I should use. I have noticed > sendmail is the default MTA, but I have no sendmail experience. Also I know > historically sendmail has had some serious security issues. You're liable to get a LOT of opinion on this. Personally, the only thing I have against sendmail is that it's configuration makes me dizzy. I use Postfix, and I recommend it to most, as it does a nice job of being secure, yet easy to configure. > Furthermore, can someone recommend a decent POP3 and IMAP server? I've been using Dovecot for quite some time now. It's not even a 1.0 product yet, and I still find it excellent for both POP and IMAP. It includes support for both POP3S and IMAPS, which I find very important in this day and age. Postfix delivering to maildirs + Dovecot for POP3S/IMAPS makes a very reliable and secure setup in my opinion. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:30:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B086816A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:30:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA7643D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:30:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.208.152] (port=3919 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp id 1ClCMl-00084B-00; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:30:19 +0300 Message-ID: <41D859DC.5080400@mail.ru> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:30:20 +0300 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cpghost@cordula.ws References: <41D8395E.4020803@mail.ru> <20050102194539.GG2583@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20050102194539.GG2583@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: basic freebsd programming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:30:20 -0000 cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:11:42PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote: > >>The ones that are the most interesting for me now is how to >>write small daemons best and how to read ipfw info from a program. >> >>Of course I can refresh my C skills and gain some Unix-coding knowledge >>by reading a couple' thousand pages, but I don't feel like it's >>necessary for what I want to write - just a basic statistics collector. > > why not just go for a scripted solution in Perl or Python? > Well, I am going to dump all the ipfw counters to disk (and process some data) in a loop of a single second. Perl adds too much overhead for this task. > >>Should I explore FreeBSD source code or is there some solid piece of >>documentation? > > > That's not necessary. If you want to write that in C, you'll have > to familiarize yourself with the popen(3) call for executing a program > and capturing its output. Then you need a few string processing functions > like str*(3) sscanf() etc... to parse the output (that's the tricky part). > Finally you will need a small example of a client and server in C that > uses the sockets API (that's pretty generic and not FreeBSD-specific at > all, just google for it). Combine all this and voila, you've got your > nice monitoring app in C. > As a matter of fact, I already do have a functional C program, processing and dumping data, which it gets from stdin. So I have a shell loop, invoking `ipfw show | c_program` every 10 seconds. But it seems to be ineffective. What I'm thinking about is a closer-to-real-time daemon dumper. > Alternatively, you could extract the info directly from the kernel > by performing exactly the same steps that your utility program (ipfw...) > does, but it's overkill for such a simple app. > ipfw show takes up to 0.1s and 500kb to run on my system. Which is great for manual checks, but almost unacceptable for continuous monitoring on a server under heavy load. I guess I'll have to learn how to look up the counters in the kernel. Thanks anyway! Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:36:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C7B16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:36:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D76643D2D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:36:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from afabian@austin.rr.com) Received: from turingmachine.mentalsiege.net (cs70112247-52.austin.rr.com [70.112.247.52])j02Kaf8H016553; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:36:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from turingmachine.mentalsiege.net (turingmachine.mentalsiege.net [127.0.0.1])j02KaWlR003802; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:36:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from afabian@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net) Received: (from afabian@localhost)j02KaVd4003801; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:36:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from afabian) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:36:31 -0600 From: Adam Fabian To: Michael Madden Message-ID: <20050102203631.GA3765@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Madden , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:36:55 -0000 On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 02:20:51PM -0600, Michael Madden wrote: > have noticed sendmail is the default MTA, but I have no sendmail > experience. Also I know historically sendmail has had some serious > security issues. sendmail is also bundled with OpenBSD, which is proactively rabid about security. Considering sendmail's track record, the OpenBSD FAQ says something to the effect that the maintainers of sendmail are responsive to security issues, unlike many projects, and the code now appears to be as secure as anything else out there. Configuration is pretty easy with the m4 macros, and sendmail still amounts to something of a de-facto standard. -- Adam Fabian (afabian@austin.rr.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:40:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B018C16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:40:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E3943D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9E689E8.dip.t-dialin.net [217.230.137.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3701A2E68F; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:40:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D85C62.4050409@incubus.de> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:41:06 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> <20050102152452.1eaf556a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20050102152452.1eaf556a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Michael Madden Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:40:44 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > I've been using Dovecot for quite some time now. It's not even a 1.0 > product yet, and I still find it excellent for both POP and IMAP. It > includes support for both POP3S and IMAPS, which I find very important > in this day and age. I've had bad experience so far with dovecot, including, but not limited to, lock file problems, hung imap processes in the bulk, and behaviour that neither matched the comments in the sample config file, nor the documentation (and both were contradictory), like the way to configure inbox and folder locations. Unless the OP has the time and resources to experiment, I'd suggest leaving that software alone for a while still until it has been stabilized, and go for proven alternatives like Cyrus or Courier (or even uw-imapd, if it's a one-person setup). mkb. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:44:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A874616A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:44:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C590643D2D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:44:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB4FFE642 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:44:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D85D10.3020303@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:44:00 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Compiling perl5.8.5 fails in chroot'ed environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:44:08 -0000 Hi, I am trying to setup a diskless client, so I have created a directory /usr/diskless and installed FreeBSD 5.3 into it. I then unpacked ports.tgz from the release and cvsup'ed yesterday. If I chroot into /usr/diskless and try to compile perl5.8 I get the following error: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.5 ./miniperl -Ilib -e 'use AutoSplit; autosplit_lib_modules(@ARGV)' lib/*/*.pm make lib/re.pm "makefile", line 915: Need an operator make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.5. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8. It only fails in the chroot'ed environment, even though the chroot has a full bootable base. I have successfully installed lynx, bash, libiconv, libtool and gettext in this environment. How do I correct this? Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:51:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A00916A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:51:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0F143D2D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:51:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC227519F6; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:51:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:51:45 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Vincent Chen Message-ID: <20050102205145.GA42951@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050101144743.97127.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050101144743.97127.qmail@web54406.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD maillist Subject: Re: fxp driver on freebsd 4.7? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:51:44 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 10:47:43PM +0800, Vincent Chen wrote: > Hi, all >=20 > I tried to install a new intel 82550 based ethernet adapter on my freebsd= 4.7. > In the first time, I don't want to recompile my kernel. So, I add the fol= lowing > line to /boot/loader.conf: >=20 > if_fxp_load=3D"YES" >=20 > The driver loaded and the adapter identified as fxp0. But the system rebo= ot > every time while I tried to run ifconfig on fxp0. Did I do anything wrong= using > loadable module? Perhaps, if it wasn't compiled at the same time as the kernel, it might be incompatible and this will cause this kind of probblem. > Or loadable module support not stable on this release. 4.7 is very old, so I doubt anyone remembers specific problems in this release. > The second time, I compile fxp driver to my new kernel and every thing se= em > work ok. This 82550 adapter has 3des support bulletin, how can I identify= this > function enabled? I doubt this is supported in 4.7. Kris --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2F7hWry0BWjoQKURAs0DAJ9vfiFladBSm1D3RyCwAnGD84QKMACfdfaK SLFvLWCfTprsY0dS6VEZisI= =asJA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:55:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3AD16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:55:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mygirlfriday.info (mo-65-41-216-204.sta.sprint-hsd.net [65.41.216.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED06243D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:55:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gv-list-freebsdquestions@mygirlfriday.info) Received: (qmail 84492 invoked by uid 1022); 2 Jan 2005 20:55:28 -0000 Received: from 65.41.216.204 by mongo.mygirlfriday.info (envelope-from , uid 1003) with qmail-scanner-1.23 (f-prot: 4.1.1/3.13.4. Clear:RC:1(65.41.216.204):. Processed in 0.296824 secs); 02 Jan 2005 20:55:28 -0000 Received: from mo-65-41-216-204.sta.sprint-hsd.net (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (65.41.216.204) by mongo.mygirlfriday.info with SMTP; 2 Jan 2005 20:55:27 -0000 Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 14:55:25 -0600 From: Gary To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1AFE5C24DC7F535FF280767F@[192.168.0.5]> In-Reply-To: <41D85C62.4050409@incubus.de> References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> <20050102152452.1eaf556a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <41D85C62.4050409@incubus.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:55:29 -0000 Hi Matthias, --On Sunday, January 02, 2005 9:41 PM +0100 Matthias Buelow wrote in part: > Unless the OP has the time and resources to experiment, I'd suggest > leaving that software alone for a while still until it has been > stabilized, and go for proven alternatives like Cyrus or Courier (or even > uw-imapd, if it's a one-person setup). There is also one other IMAP server called bincimap which is in ports. This is made for Maildir mail type only. It works quite well and is actively supported by its author. I have several production FreeBSD boxes using it without problems. It is extremely easy to set up, even the certs for IMAPS. -- Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:56:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A8916A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:56:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCCC43D48 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:56:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38772511AB; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:57:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:57:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Matthias Buelow Message-ID: <20050102205701.GB42951@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050102091914.3D0B9114F1@mail.cypherpunks.to> <20050102101309.GA72018@xor.obsecurity.org> <41D838DF.4090106@incubus.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+g7M9IMkV8truYOl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41D838DF.4090106@incubus.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.maxfiles formula? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:56:59 -0000 --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:09:35PM +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >A truly enormous number :-) You just need to increase the value of > >kern.maxfiles in /boot/loader.conf as appropriate for your workload. >=20 > would it be possible to make this dynamically allocated in the future?=20 Having a hard limit is by design, or users could run your machine out of memory and cause it to panic. > imho, such limits are a bit anachronistic. No, you're just using an abnormal workload on your machine, for which the defaults are not sufficient. Kris --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2GAcWry0BWjoQKURAhFlAKC+EbuteH2HVkdPiVm6kdBtD3BbgACg8oo4 /2DprKhAzOPMRtqaE5q2LKw= =CSM0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+g7M9IMkV8truYOl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:57:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD8916A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:57:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05A743D3F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:57:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E071751756; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:57:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:57:39 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Florian Hengstberger Message-ID: <20050102205739.GC42951@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD mailinglist Subject: Re: TCP_RESTRICT_RST in 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:57:38 -0000 --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:21:22AM +0100, Florian Hengstberger wrote: > Following the istructions of Mrs. Lavigne on ONLamp.com > I was trying to build a kernel with the options TCP_RESTRICT_RST. > config ignores this option. >=20 > How can I include this in 5.2.1, I can't find a similar > option in my LINT file. It was removed; check the CVS logs on cvsweb.freebsd.org. Kris --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2GBCWry0BWjoQKURAlvgAJ9bLx157DwxcPNeGWi1e0fvpl1zwgCg9Ok9 sLpscixSAv5FcvPxd3QfwO4= =0hPh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2/5bycvrmDh4d1IB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:59:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A6F16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:59:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25D443D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C109651756; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:59:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:59:30 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Erik Norgaard Message-ID: <20050102205930.GD42951@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41D85D10.3020303@locolomo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WChQLJJJfbwij+9x" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41D85D10.3020303@locolomo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Compiling perl5.8.5 fails in chroot'ed environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:59:29 -0000 --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:44:00PM +0100, Erik Norgaard wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I am trying to setup a diskless client, so I have created a directory > /usr/diskless and installed FreeBSD 5.3 into it. I then unpacked > ports.tgz from the release and cvsup'ed yesterday. >=20 > If I chroot into /usr/diskless and try to compile perl5.8 I get the > following error: >=20 > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D/usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.5 ./miniperl -Ilib > -e 'use AutoSplit; autosplit_lib_modules(@ARGV)' lib/*/*.pm > make lib/re.pm > "makefile", line 915: Need an operator > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.5. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8. >=20 > It only fails in the chroot'ed environment, even though the chroot has a= =20 > full bootable base. I have successfully installed lynx, bash, libiconv,= =20 > libtool and gettext in this environment. >=20 > How do I correct this? Do you have devfs mounted in the chroot? Kris --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2GCyWry0BWjoQKURAuJNAJ95T3GUhiJ9c1meW/QK4Fmi0ImnCACfelBI CHIiFyn0pput2/bed5+IrnE= =GV+5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 20:59:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA26F16A4ED for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:59:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEEC43D46 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:59:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgnezdov@pobox.com) X-Sasl-enc: 1IZjrSWyb472ImJr1/jEUw 1104699571 Received: from localhost.localdomain (207-224-115-144.spkn.qwest.net [207.224.115.144]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB29C48684 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:59:30 -0500 (EST) From: Sergei Gnezdov To: Questions FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20050102203631.GA3765@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> <20050102203631.GA3765@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6+HOqkYLiXkpdX/MUM+U" Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:59:39 -0800 Message-Id: <1104699579.63517.14.camel@owl2> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:59:33 -0000 --=-6+HOqkYLiXkpdX/MUM+U Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 14:36 -0600, Adam Fabian wrote: > Configuration is pretty easy with the m4 macros, and sendmail still > amounts to something of a de-facto standard. =20 I am not saying senmail is bad. In fact, I have no plans to get rid of it. I just want to know where to find the information about sendmail when I need it. Where do I go to learn about sendmail configuration? Any HOWTO instructions? Where do I send newbie questions to? --=-6+HOqkYLiXkpdX/MUM+U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB2GC7LG0a64EQke4RAox2AJ9JZYIFvTdIjT+1mXDGVoTALzXXqQCfY21/ rbAFXNBjyfGoIdyWwJXR3Co= =bW0y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6+HOqkYLiXkpdX/MUM+U-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 21:05:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61F816A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:05:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333D543D39 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:05:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:15530 helo=openbsd.piweb.intern) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ClCuw-0001TU-Ib; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:05:38 +0000 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:05:38 +0100 From: Nico Meijer To: Bill Moran Message-Id: <20050102220538.19dbff63.nico.meijer@zonnet.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050102152452.1eaf556a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> <20050102152452.1eaf556a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-unknown-openbsd3.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:05:40 -0000 Hi Bill, > I use Postfix, and I recommend it to most, as it does a nice job of > being secure, yet easy to configure. Nicely put. It's been my favorite MTA aswell for a number of years now. I liked your presentation on antispam measures using postfix, which shows its flexibility. Heck, I'll link it: http://www.potentialtech.com/wmoran/spam.pdf Thanks for that... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 21:08:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAB816A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:08:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EBA43D39 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:08:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 24861 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2005 13:08:23 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 2 Jan 2005 13:08:23 -0800 Message-ID: <41D862B1.9020506@taborandtashell.net> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:08:01 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Madden References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> In-Reply-To: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:08:26 -0000 Michael Madden wrote: > I'm looking to setup a mail server with FreeBSD 5.3 for a group of around > 100 users, and I was wondering which MTA I should use. I have noticed > sendmail is the default MTA, but I have no sendmail experience. Also I know > historically sendmail has had some serious security issues. > > Furthermore, can someone recommend a decent POP3 and IMAP server? > > Thanks in advance, > Mike > I use qmail + dovecot. I have some rough drafts of howto's here: http://tabor.taborandtashell.net/serversetup/qmail.html http://tabor.taborandtashell.net/serversetup/dovecot.html -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 21:15:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EAA16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:15:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDAA43D3F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j02LFSlQ032925 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:15:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j02LFX3E082409 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:15:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j02LFWY5082408 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:15:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:15:31 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20050102211531.GA82339@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: java question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:15:36 -0000 On both my 4.10 system (this one: tao) and one on my 5.3 platforms, I'm *finally* using jdk14. Can I free up the linux-sun-jdk14 binary and space and yet be able to build/rebuild everything Java?? (I'd like it if we had a FBSD version of everything but [*sigh*] that's not the way it is? gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 21:23:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFD016A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:23:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693B343D2F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:23:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2368AFE642; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:23:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D8665F.5010206@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:23:43 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <41D85D10.3020303@locolomo.org> <20050102205930.GD42951@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050102205930.GD42951@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Compiling perl5.8.5 fails in chroot'ed environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:23:47 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Do you have devfs mounted in the chroot? Nope, ... but it doesn't seem to help either. Maybe I am doing it wrong: mount -t devfs devfs /usr/diskless/dev ? I also tried chroot first, then 'mount -t devfs devfs /dev' - no difference. But I don't see what devfs has got do do with make? Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 21:44:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABC916A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:44:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from crumpet.united-ware.com (ddsl-66-42-172-210.fuse.net [66.42.172.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3671A43D53 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:44:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (adsl-69-208-54-135.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [69.208.54.135]) (authenticated bits=0)j02LLUWp003008 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:21:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:48:10 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> <20050102203631.GA3765@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <1104699579.63517.14.camel@owl2> In-Reply-To: <1104699579.63517.14.camel@owl2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1940390.9jPebkIn8R"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200501021648.17318.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on crumpet.united-ware.com cc: Sergei Gnezdov Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:44:51 -0000 --nextPart1940390.9jPebkIn8R Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 02 January 2005 03:59 pm, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 14:36 -0600, Adam Fabian wrote: > > Configuration is pretty easy with the m4 macros, and sendmail still > > amounts to something of a de-facto standard. > > I am not saying senmail is bad. In fact, I have no plans to get rid of > it. I just want to know where to find the information about sendmail > when I need it. > > Where do I go to learn about sendmail configuration? Pick up the O'Reilly "Bat Book" Sendmail book. The sendmail.org site is=20 also a very good resource as well as IRC on freenode. > Any HOWTO instructions? > Where do I send newbie questions to? =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart1940390.9jPebkIn8R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB2GwhxqA5ziudZT0RAtaZAKDNLp9FX6ioUL0L6jYfbP+NxwBmzQCggaKr iOU7TfTOk0FcmAz4uvXUqB8= =/PFO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1940390.9jPebkIn8R-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 21:45:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBC416A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:45:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3E043D1F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:45:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9E689E8.dip.t-dialin.net [217.230.137.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B28E2E8FB; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:45:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D86B7C.3010202@incubus.de> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:45:32 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20050102091914.3D0B9114F1@mail.cypherpunks.to> <20050102101309.GA72018@xor.obsecurity.org> <41D838DF.4090106@incubus.de> <20050102205701.GB42951@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050102205701.GB42951@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.maxfiles formula? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:45:07 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Having a hard limit is by design, or users could run your machine out > of memory and cause it to panic. # sysctl -w kern.maxfiles=20000 kern.maxfiles: 12328 -> 20000 Ok, I agree. Must've confused something here. I was under the impression that it was fixed at boot. The user issue could be tackled with ulimit, however probably not in a completely satisfactory way (with resource limits being per-process, not per-user. Sometimes a bit of VMS would be nice ;). mkb. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 21:52:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254D416A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:52:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3B943D3F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:52:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35583FE642; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:52:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D86CFE.8060609@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:51:58 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Norgaard References: <41D85D10.3020303@locolomo.org> <20050102205930.GD42951@xor.obsecurity.org> <41D8665F.5010206@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <41D8665F.5010206@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Solved: Compiling perl5.8.5 fails in chroot'ed environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:52:03 -0000 Erik Norgaard wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> Do you have devfs mounted in the chroot? > > Nope, ... but it doesn't seem to help either. Hmm. Ok, I tried again: # chroot /usr/diskless # mount -t devfs devfs /dev # su -l # cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 # make that worked.!? Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 21:56:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AD716A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:56:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F3F43D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:56:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4E7423B; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:57:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43954-09; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:57:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E36412F; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:57:17 +0100 (CET) From: "Jorn Argelo" To: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:57:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20050102215027.M23111@wcborstel.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050102211531.GA82339@thought.org> References: <20050102211531.GA82339@thought.org> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 82.161.134.53 (jorn) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.wcborstel.nl Subject: Re: java question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:56:44 -0000 On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:15:31 -0800, Gary Kline wrote > On both my 4.10 system (this one: tao) and one on my > 5.3 platforms, I'm *finally* using jdk14. Can I free > up the linux-sun-jdk14 binary and space and yet be > able to build/rebuild everything Java?? Well, I can't say for sure. You have to make sure that your system is indeed using the proper executable and the proper libs. If you have things mixed you can have a serious problem. AFAIK everything is put in /compat/linux ... so deinstalling it wouldn't bring in too much problem. However, unless you have serious disk space problems, I can't see why risk to break stuff if it is not needed. Correct me if any of the above things are wrong, of course :) Cheers, Jorn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 21:57:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053C416A4CF for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:57:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ds.netgate.net (ds.netgate.net [205.214.170.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DE443D2D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:57:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ctodd@chrismiller.com) Received: (qmail 3983 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2005 21:57:12 -0000 Received: from vp4.netgate.net (ibrew@205.214.170.248) by ds.netgate.net with SMTP; 2 Jan 2005 21:57:12 -0000 Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:57:12 -0800 (PST) From: ctodd@chrismiller.com X-X-Sender: ibrew@vp4.netgate.net To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20050102100949.6d0822d5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Message-ID: References: <20050102100949.6d0822d5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Eric Kjeldergaard cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: write state to swap for multi-os boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:57:13 -0000 On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Bill Moran wrote: > But it's a great way to boot Linux under Windows, or FreeBSD under > either, or have multiple OSes running simultaneously under a single > computer. How good is device support from within vmware? Can I get to serial/usb/audio/network ports seamlessly? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 22:28:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B54216A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:28:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796D443D31 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:28:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j02MSJj14251; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:28:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Nikolas Britton" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:28:19 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <41D7F1BB.6020402@nbritton.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Weird problem with 3C509 ISA NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:28:25 -0000 Run the DOS configuration program 3c5x9cfg.exe and look at how the card is setup. Like many ISA cards the 3c509 has an eeprom instead of jumpers that you move around on the card. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Nikolas Britton > Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 5:06 AM > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: Weird problem with 3C509 ISA NIC > > > I was looking at the dmesg output on my firewall and "re"-remembered > that I have this 3Com 509 card that doesn't work quite right. take a > look at the demsg output below... > > dmesg: > ep0: <3Com 3C509-TPO EtherLink III> at port 0x300-0x30f irq 10 on isa0 > ep0: No irq?! > ep0: ep_alloc() failed! (6) > device_probe_and_attach: ep0 attach returned 6 > ep1: <3Com 3C509B-TPO EtherLink III (PnP)> at port 0x210-0x21f > irq 3 on isa0 > ep1: Ethernet address 00:10:4b:54:39:52 > > There is only one of those cards in the system yet there are two ep > devices. IIRC I have always had problems with this card in any system/OS > I put it in, infact FreeBSD is the only OS I can get it to work in... I > also have an identical clone of this card (might be a diffrent revision) > that works perfectly in FreeBSD or any system I stick it in. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 22:41:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE4416A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:41:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5073643D4C for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:41:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j02MfRpY039046; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:41:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j02MfRSY039043; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:41:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 15:41:27 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Michael Madden In-Reply-To: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> Message-ID: <20050102153511.J38996@wonkity.com> References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:41:27 -0700 (MST) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:41:45 -0000 On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Michael Madden wrote: > I'm looking to setup a mail server with FreeBSD 5.3 for a group of around > 100 users, and I was wondering which MTA I should use. I have noticed > sendmail is the default MTA, but I have no sendmail experience. Also I know > historically sendmail has had some serious security issues. So have other MTAs, including one for Postfix not so long ago. Sendmail configuration can be charitably called "odd", but it's so widely used that answers can usually be found on google or groups.google.com. Then there's comp.mail.sendmail, and sendmail.org, the bat book, and even sendmail.com. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 22:42:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C1316A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cms-stl.com (smtp.cms-stl.com [192.94.149.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4237043D1D for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from madden@cmsrtp.com) Message-ID: <41D878DE.6070303@cmsrtp.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:42:38 -0600 From: Michael Madden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anish Mistry References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> <20050102203631.GA3765@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <1104699579.63517.14.camel@owl2> <200501021648.17318.mistry.7@osu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200501021648.17318.mistry.7@osu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMS-Received: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:42:42 -0600, [192.168.2.2] (port=36779 helo=[192.168.2.2]) X-CMS-Authenticated-User: madden X-CMS-Received: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:42:43 -0600, [192.168.2.2] (port=36779 helo=[192.168.2.2]) X-CMS-Archived: smtp.cms-stl.com X-CMS-Scanned: Sophos Anti-Virus X-CMS-Received: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 16:42:43 -0600, localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:52730 helo=lxmail.cms-stl.com) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: madden@cmsrtp.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on smtp.cms-stl.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false cc: Sergei Gnezdov cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:42:45 -0000 >>Where do I go to learn about sendmail configuration? > > Pick up the O'Reilly "Bat Book" Sendmail book. The sendmail.org site is > also a very good resource as well as IRC on freenode. > >>Any HOWTO instructions? >>Where do I send newbie questions to? Does anyone know of a good tutorial/howto for configuring sendmail on FreeBSD. My two books ('Absolute BSD' and 'The Complete FreeBSD') make little mention of sendmail configuration and focus on setting up postfix. The FreeBSD Handbook seems incomplete and glosses over details: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail.html 1.) How do I edit /etc/rc.conf to start sendmail at boot. 2.) Most of the configurations files seem pretty normal, but sendmail.cf seems quite obtuse. I guess I'm looking for a document that would walk a newbie through setting up sendmail on FreeBSD without being too arcane or not detailed enough. My experience with some of the other Oreilly books leads me to believe they're pretty generic; I doubt I'd find information on how to setup sendmail for FreeBSD. Thanks again, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 22:45:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DF016A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:45:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADECC43D3F for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:45:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6467E51756; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:45:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:45:15 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: ortega willy Message-ID: <20050102224515.GA75193@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050102065711.93808.qmail@web21004.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050102065711.93808.qmail@web21004.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: just an inquiry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:45:13 -0000 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 10:57:11PM -0800, ortega willy wrote: > i just like to know how i can be qualified to post a hardware > request from your donors like i would like to have a replacement for > my hard disk drive for my laptop. The donation request list you see on the freebsd website is only for FreeBSD committers, sorry. Kris --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2Hl7Wry0BWjoQKURApepAJ9PPL5v0NXdwwIHWFWG2XEa2Iv1lQCfYVA6 UWThz1mMbsCKQl+IaKnMoaw= =0TsW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 22:59:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9A616A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:59:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out004.verizon.net (out004pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BD843D45 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 22:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.org) Received: from keyslapper.org ([68.163.177.192]) by out004.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050102225928.RHVW8290.out004.verizon.net@keyslapper.org> for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:59:28 -0600 Received: by keyslapper.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5F4D7114FF; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:59:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:59:27 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050102225927.GA10404@keyslapper.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20041226014550.45577.qmail@web53308.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out004.verizon.net from [68.163.177.192] at Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:59:28 -0600 Subject: Re: triple monitor hardware setup on FBSD - suggestions needed... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 22:59:29 -0000 On 01/01/05 11:08 PM, Eric Kjeldergaard sat at the `puter and typed: > > I am currently running a triple-monitor setup under > > winXP, with an extended desktop that stretches across > > all three monitors. I like it. > > > > I would, however, like to use FreeBSD. > > Good choice :) > > > So, first off, what hardware (video card) comes to > > mind for doing triple screens with FreeBSD ? A matrox > > P750 comes to mind, but when you run it with three > > screens, they downgrade to 1280x1024, which is bad. I > > am happy to consider multiple video cards to > > accomplish this ... at the very least I need 1600x1200 > > out of each card, preferably 1920x1200 ... > > Well, as far as hardware goes for my tri-monitor, I usually have a > Radeon 7500 and an geforce2 mx400 (or some other cruddy pci card) > though I'm using a matrox G450 for the primary right now. Really, any > combination of supported video cards will work about equally well. > > > Second, what is the support for something like this in > > XFree86, or x.org ? What I am really looking for is > > the ability to create virtually sized screens - so > > instead of having three total (physical) screens that > > I can maximize windows inside of, I want to split each > > physical screen in half for a total of 6 virtual > > screens - so there are six total areas within which I > > can maximize a window in ... this is something I am > > really trying to accomplish. I think you'll get this through the window manager. I'm only running two monitors with the Xinerama extensions (Xorg) but I use fvwm as my window manager. Just define your desktop to be a 1X2 area, and you'll have 2 screens for each monitor. I use 3X2, so I have 3 screens for each monitor. You can even use the pager to define multiple desktops, all using the same geography. If you want each screen to scroll individually of the others, meaning changing the screen on one monitor doesn't change the screen on the others, I'm not sure that's possible. Think of the monitors as a 3 paned window onto the desktop, and everything makes sense. Good luck. Lou -- Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD@keyslapper.org Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org Ô¿Ô¬ People who go to conferences are the ones who shouldn't. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 2 23:17:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3677416A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:17:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.sa.chariot.net.au (mail3.sa.chariot.net.au [203.87.94.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECA743D45 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:17:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imoore@picknowl.com.au) Received: from jupiter.picknowl.com.au (jupiter.picknowl.com.au [203.87.94.38]) by mail3.sa.chariot.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFBAA475C; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:47:57 +1030 (CST) Received: from daemon.foo.com (adsl-176-70.swiftdsl.com.au [218.214.176.70]) by jupiter.picknowl.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5013F9685A; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:47:57 +1030 (CST) From: Ian Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:47:49 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050102211531.GA82339@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20050102211531.GA82339@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2748916.603ud1kYZx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200501030947.55975.imoore@picknowl.com.au> cc: Gary Kline Subject: Re: java question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:17:59 -0000 --nextPart2748916.603ud1kYZx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:45, Gary Kline wrote: > On both my 4.10 system (this one: tao) and one on my > 5.3 platforms, I'm *finally* using jdk14. Can I free > up the linux-sun-jdk14 binary and space and yet be > able to build/rebuild everything Java?? > > (I'd like it if we had a FBSD version of everything > but [*sigh*] that's not the way it is? > > gary Yes you can. I deinstalled my linux-java a while back & have successfully=20 updated jdk-14 twice since then - you only need the linux version the first= =20 tim. Cheers, =2D-=20 Ian GPG Key: http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/imoore/imoore.asc --nextPart2748916.603ud1kYZx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB2IEjfITqkXhImmIRAl5iAJ9wksS48q3pRt0IlCjy6gdCQQrj+gCfYaaW 3WOEVERhu2hhG4ohA2FHMBM= =/4oF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2748916.603ud1kYZx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 00:06:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E7716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:06:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A604043D2F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:06:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j0306cKj033269; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:06:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0306iag082883; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:06:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j0306g0i082882; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:06:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:06:41 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Jorn Argelo Message-ID: <20050103000641.GA82833@thought.org> References: <20050102211531.GA82339@thought.org> <20050102215027.M23111@wcborstel.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050102215027.M23111@wcborstel.nl> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Gary Kline cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: java question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:06:48 -0000 On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:57:17PM +0100, Jorn Argelo wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:15:31 -0800, Gary Kline wrote > > On both my 4.10 system (this one: tao) and one on my > > 5.3 platforms, I'm *finally* using jdk14. Can I free > > up the linux-sun-jdk14 binary and space and yet be > > able to build/rebuild everything Java?? > > Well, I can't say for sure. You have to make sure that your system is indeed > using the proper executable and the proper libs. If you have things mixed you > can have a serious problem. > > AFAIK everything is put in /compat/linux ... so deinstalling it wouldn't bring > in too much problem. However, unless you have serious disk space problems, I > can't see why risk to break stuff if it is not needed. > Thanks. On my laptop that's currently being ports-upgraded I have seen /compat/linux complaints (mostly re mozilla). I *think* future Java builds will work and java will work from the browser... but better to be safe than bashing my head :) gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 00:10:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB90716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:10:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C33643D39 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:10:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j030AYjd033282 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:10:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j030AelE082918; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j030AdGo082917; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:10:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 16:10:38 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Ian Moore Message-ID: <20050103001038.GB82833@thought.org> References: <20050102211531.GA82339@thought.org> <200501030947.55975.imoore@picknowl.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501030947.55975.imoore@picknowl.com.au> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Gary Kline cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:10:42 -0000 On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:47:49AM +1030, Ian Moore wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:45, Gary Kline wrote: > > On both my 4.10 system (this one: tao) and one on my > > 5.3 platforms, I'm *finally* using jdk14. Can I free > > up the linux-sun-jdk14 binary and space and yet be > > able to build/rebuild everything Java?? > > > > (I'd like it if we had a FBSD version of everything > > but [*sigh*] that's not the way it is? > > > > gary > Yes you can. I deinstalled my linux-java a while back & have successfully > updated jdk-14 twice since then - you only need the linux version the first > tim. > Outstanding!! gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 00:44:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB0216A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:44:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B3843D2D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:44:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay@codegurus.org) Received: from user-3028.l2.c2.dsl.pol.co.uk ([81.77.107.212] helo=[192.168.0.2]) by cmailg4.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1ClGKf-0006aX-Ew for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:44:25 +0000 Message-ID: <41D895A4.5080100@codegurus.org> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:45:24 +0000 From: Jayton Garnett User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041217) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: freebsd training/certification X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:44:27 -0000 Hello, I am wondering if there are any training/certification courses that I could take to become a FreeBSD guru? I have been using the OS for over a year now and have become very familiar with installation/configuration but would like to be able to add some sort of certification to my CV. Also how much of a "threat" is Solaris 10 x86 to FreeBSD and how come FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora? Thanks, Jayton Garnett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 00:47:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F5016A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:47:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C3243D2F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:47:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6833C6244; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:47:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50052-10; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:47:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5041B6245; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:47:01 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <41D89606.1050504@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:47:02 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050101) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jayton Garnett References: <41D895A4.5080100@codegurus.org> In-Reply-To: <41D895A4.5080100@codegurus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.0 (20041102) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd training/certification X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:47:04 -0000 Jayton Garnett wrote: > Hello, > > I am wondering if there are any training/certification courses that I > could take to become a FreeBSD guru? > > I have been using the OS for over a year now and have become very > familiar with installation/configuration but would like to be able to > add some sort of certification to my CV. > Also how much of a "threat" is Solaris 10 x86 to FreeBSD and how come > FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora? > > Thanks, > Jayton Garnett Search this list - you will find all your answers. This has been hashed over many, many times. Do a little work on your part - and you'll find out on your own. -- Best regards, Chris Real programmers don't announce how many times the operations department called them last night. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 01:01:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9113216A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:01:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364C143D46 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:01:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678F06244; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:01:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50625-03; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:01:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC63F621C; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:01:03 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <41D89950.6000201@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:01:04 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050101) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jayton Garnett References: <41D895A4.5080100@codegurus.org> In-Reply-To: <41D895A4.5080100@codegurus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.0 (20041102) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd training/certification X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:01:07 -0000 Jayton Garnett wrote: > Hello, > > I am wondering if there are any training/certification courses that I > could take to become a FreeBSD guru? > > I have been using the OS for over a year now and have become very > familiar with installation/configuration but would like to be able to > add some sort of certification to my CV. > Also how much of a "threat" is Solaris 10 x86 to FreeBSD and how come > FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora? > > Thanks, > Jayton Garnett ... come to think of it... This has to be a troll. Let's ponder this... The user states, "I have been using the OS for over a year now", Hmmm seems to me that the user should KNOW the answer to, "and how come FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora?" In addition - using it for a year now, this would make one think that the user would have read the cert thread of not even a month ago. But let's really notice how the user unfolds the message. Starts off nice, curious to a point and even showing that the user wishes to possibly contribute to the foundation as a whole. Once the user "softens" the audience, delivers the one-two punch tactic of the evil creature known as a troll. However, this one don't look like Shrek ... Just my comical way of looking at things. -- Best regards, Chris A budget is spending $15.00 on gas to drive to a shopping mall to save $4.30 on a 20 pound turkey. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 01:06:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6358416A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:06:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B9C43D46 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:06:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgnezdov@pobox.com) X-Sasl-enc: OZUh+K3+mu1IJqTDh40yFQ 1104714414 Received: from localhost.localdomain (207-224-115-144.spkn.qwest.net [207.224.115.144]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376CEC49043 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:06:53 -0500 (EST) From: Sergei Gnezdov To: Questions FreeBSD Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-4OtAfR2fWxmbkBY5y/Fc" Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:07:03 -0800 Message-Id: <1104714423.63517.39.camel@owl2> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: Mailing Lists (and high volumes) vs Newsgroups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:06:56 -0000 --=-4OtAfR2fWxmbkBY5y/Fc Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Although I've been using FreeBSD for several years, I have not been active with mailing lists at all. I preferred to use newsgroups search and a little bit of posting. I am wondering, why mailing list is the official support mechanism (as opposed to newsgroups)? Ruby seems to be supported through newsgroups quite nicely. It seems to me that mailing lists still expose senders email address. I am worried about getting spam because of this. Ok, nntp is even worse, but I can manage that. I also find that email applications don't deal as well with high volume email messages. I am comparing against newsreaders like: - Emacs GNUS - slrn I like these newsreaders, because they allow me to assign scores based on the subject and authors. I can easily handle a very high volume ruby newsgroup. The longer I use the newsreader the faster I become. For example, if I did not pay attention the the original message the replies are ignored automatically for me. I will read 2 - 3 messages I am interested out of 1000 post list in 30 seconds. Ok, may be I am using the wrong tools... I settled on Evolution as my primary application and I like it. Thunderbird is not bad either. Neither can handle high volume subscriptions. I'd appretiate advice on how to improve email handling. --=-4OtAfR2fWxmbkBY5y/Fc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB2Jq3LG0a64EQke4RAqm9AKCWVawv9tTcW2VRWzX6PrJrpjv/wQCfZVpR /UEzAPv2frEzw37pUi69U38= =vs98 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-4OtAfR2fWxmbkBY5y/Fc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 01:20:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4291516A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:20:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ispmxmta06-srv.alltel.net (ispmxmta06-srv.alltel.net [166.102.165.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985C843D31 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:20:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trey@fastmail.fm) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [69.40.74.131]) by ispmxmta06-srv.alltel.net with ESMTP id <20050103012042.JUZI4112.ispmxmta06-srv.alltel.net@[192.168.0.2]> for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:20:42 -0600 From: Trey Sizemore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1104696792.806.6.camel@localhost> References: <1104696792.806.6.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:22:14 -0500 Message-Id: <1104715334.806.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Why might my USB devices *not* be detected? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:20:45 -0000 On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 15:13 -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote: Sorry for replying to myself, but wanted to fix the subject (less confusing). Might this have something to do with the usbd.conf file (I've not changed mine, but perhaps something to be added?). -- Cheers, Trey --- "This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it." -- Dorothy Parker 8:20PM up 6:28, 0 users, load averages: 0.05, 0.12, 0.41 FreeBSD salamander.thesizemores.net 5.3-STABLE i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 01:27:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3170D16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:27:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CCE43D39 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:27:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from j65nko@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so9923wri for ; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:27:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ZCPIdzYotvsFjmvCUiOhKRUJ+K6uTRQEcFc/9WSdNCFbu7t+SXg5DLOx/Nwk7j5SJJqshI7VWivvvSsuGth6TfVOIix2BXrrK+jyFtVZKAyp2vg2pH1NzUBiLgSyTR8qV3od3mBE9nV87SRRboeFdyNPxM4Rg+jw7jv2/k7KUec= Received: by 10.54.22.25 with SMTP id 25mr901967wrv; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:27:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.37.19 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 17:27:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19861fba0501021727839c945@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:27:13 +0100 From: J65nko BSD To: infofarmer@mail.ru In-Reply-To: <41D8395E.4020803@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41D8395E.4020803@mail.ru> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: basic freebsd programming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: J65nko BSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:27:15 -0000 On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:11:42 +0300, Andrew P. wrote: > Hello and Happy New Year! > > I need to write some very basic C programs under FreeBSD. I am new to > Unix programming and not very good at C programming either, so I'm > looking for documentation on some topics. The ones that are the most > interesting for me now is how to write small daemons best and how to > read ipfw info from a program. Man pages help me very much, but I really > need some guide. The problem is that doc project doesn't seem to have > released anything like it. I looked through dev-, arch-, porters- > handbooks, read design-44bsd - but I didn't find what I want. > > Of course I can refresh my C skills and gain some Unix-coding knowledge > by reading a couple' thousand pages, but I don't feel like it's > necessary for what I want to write - just a basic statistics collector. > > Should I explore FreeBSD source code or is there some solid piece of > documentation? > > Best wishes, > Andrew P. This could be useful: http://www.khmere.com/freebsd_book/index.html Table of Contents: * I. Introduction * Chapter 1: FreeBSD's Make * Chapter 2: Bootstrapping BSD * Chapter 3: Processes and Kernel Services * Chapter 4: Advanced Process Controls and Signals * Chapter 5: Basic I/O * Chapter 6: Advanced I/O * Chapter 7: Processes Resources and System Limits * Chapter 8: FreeBSD 5.x * All source code * Entire book in a tarball ==Adriaan== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 01:36:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AB216A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:36:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CF543D2F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:36:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) id j031aZ1O062053; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:36:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:36:35 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Sergei Gnezdov Message-ID: <20050103013635.GA79022@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1104714423.63517.39.camel@owl2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1104714423.63517.39.camel@owl2> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Questions FreeBSD Subject: Re: Mailing Lists (and high volumes) vs Newsgroups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:36:43 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 02), Sergei Gnezdov said: > Although I've been using FreeBSD for several years, I have not been > active with mailing lists at all. I preferred to use newsgroups > search and a little bit of posting. You can use gmane.org to read almost all of the FreeBSD lists via nntp. > I am wondering, why mailing list is the official support mechanism > (as opposed to newsgroups)? Ruby seems to be supported through > newsgroups quite nicely. It's a lot easier to read email offline than nntp, for one, and conversations progress much quicker on email lists because people interested in the topic get messages immediately instead of having to constantly poll the news server. I subscribe to mailing lists that I am active on, and less-frequently used ones I read via gmane's nntp interface every few days. I use mutt's scoring rules to sort topics (mutt is both an email client and a newsreader, but I only use it for mail; I read my news with mozilla). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 01:44:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4342816A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:44:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAD743D45 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:44:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.208.152] (port=4299 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp id 1ClHGQ-0004Di-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:44:06 +0300 Message-ID: <41D8A367.8080006@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:44:07 +0300 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <41D8395E.4020803@mail.ru> <19861fba0501021727839c945@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <19861fba0501021727839c945@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: basic freebsd programming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:44:08 -0000 J65nko BSD wrote: > > This could be useful: http://www.khmere.com/freebsd_book/index.html > > Table of Contents: > > * I. Introduction > * Chapter 1: FreeBSD's Make > * Chapter 2: Bootstrapping BSD > * Chapter 3: Processes and Kernel Services > * Chapter 4: Advanced Process Controls and Signals > * Chapter 5: Basic I/O > * Chapter 6: Advanced I/O > * Chapter 7: Processes Resources and System Limits > * Chapter 8: FreeBSD 5.x > * All source code > * Entire book in a tarball > Thanks! Kinda what I'm looking for. I'll print it and read carefully, and I'd be very glad if I knew about similar sources of information (except for official doc project). Best wishes, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 01:50:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C54B16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:50:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out002.verizon.net (out002pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C7C43D3F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:50:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.org) Received: from keyslapper.org ([68.163.177.192]) by out002.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050103015041.YPDD12052.out002.verizon.net@keyslapper.org> for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:50:41 -0600 Received: by keyslapper.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5A7011151A; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:50:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:50:40 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050103015040.GB10404@keyslapper.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41D895A4.5080100@codegurus.org> <41D89950.6000201@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <41D89950.6000201@makeworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out002.verizon.net from [68.163.177.192] at Sun, 2 Jan 2005 19:50:41 -0600 Subject: Re: freebsd training/certification X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:50:42 -0000 On 01/02/05 07:01 PM, Chris sat at the `puter and typed: > Jayton Garnett wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am wondering if there are any training/certification courses that I > > could take to become a FreeBSD guru? > > > > I have been using the OS for over a year now and have become very > > familiar with installation/configuration but would like to be able to > > add some sort of certification to my CV. > > Also how much of a "threat" is Solaris 10 x86 to FreeBSD and how come > > FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora? > > > > Thanks, > > Jayton Garnett > > ... come to think of it... This has to be a troll. Let's ponder this... Not nececelery, but yes, lettuce ponder . . . > The user states, "I have been using the OS for over a year now", Hmmm > seems to me that the user should KNOW the answer to, "and how come > FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora?" Obviously not a well thought out question, but I have to admit that I *don't* read *every* single thread on the list. In fact I probably read half - or less, of what comes to me through the list. I just don't have time. As far as why FreeBSD isn't as popular as RH/Fedora - wait, you really mean it isn't? :) > In addition - using it for a year now, this would make one think that > the user would have read the cert thread of not even a month ago. There are threads from yesterday I didn't read. I try to limit what I read to those that indicate (reasonably) from the subject that it is something I can answer, something related to a particular problem I'm working on, or something otherwise of interest. I've been using FreeBSD for almost 5 years, and my knowledge of it is still a drop in the bucket. > But let's really notice how the user unfolds the message. Starts off > nice, curious to a point and even showing that the user wishes to > possibly contribute to the foundation as a whole. Ah, yes. I was naieve once too. Thought I was the answer to all FreeBSDs problems :) Chalk it up to Newbie Zeal. Yeah, even though he's been using it for a year. Using it doesn't mean learning the internals, architecture, etc. I can install the OS, ports, set up a mail services, web services, ftp, firewall (more or less) and still I'm a newbie. FreeBSD is definitely my OS of preference, but I've lost a little of that zeal. > Once the user "softens" the audience, delivers the one-two punch tactic > of the evil creature known as a troll. However, this one don't look > like Shrek Not sure he's necessarily a troll, but I see your angle. > ... Just my comical way of looking at things. Most entertaining :) > -- > Best regards, > Chris Ditto Lou -- Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD@keyslapper.org Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org Ô¿Ô¬ Pohl's law: Nothing is so good that somebody, somewhere, will not hate it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 02:00:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDC716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:00:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out001.verizon.net (out001pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5709343D2D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:00:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leblanc@keyslapper.org) Received: from keyslapper.org ([68.163.177.192]) by out001.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050103020035.XEQI28025.out001.verizon.net@keyslapper.org> for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:00:35 -0600 Received: by keyslapper.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E4A9911558; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:00:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:00:34 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050103020034.GC10404@keyslapper.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41D895A4.5080100@codegurus.org> <41D89606.1050504@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <41D89606.1050504@makeworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out001.verizon.net from [68.163.177.192] at Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:00:35 -0600 Subject: Re: freebsd training/certification X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:00:50 -0000 On 01/02/05 06:47 PM, Chris sat at the `puter and typed: > Jayton Garnett wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am wondering if there are any training/certification courses that I > > could take to become a FreeBSD guru? > > > > I have been using the OS for over a year now and have become very > > familiar with installation/configuration but would like to be able to > > add some sort of certification to my CV. > > Also how much of a "threat" is Solaris 10 x86 to FreeBSD and how come > > FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora? > > > > Thanks, > > Jayton Garnett > > Search this list - you will find all your answers. This has been hashed > over many, many times. Do a little work on your part - and you'll find > out on your own. That last line: "Do a little work on your part - and you'll find out on your own." That's the certification program :) You can learn more about FreeBSD in a month on the list and reading the books written on it than you'll ever learn (or care to retain) from some MS cert program. Best part is it only costs book fees and . . . what's the brains equivalent of "elbow grease"? Hard work, anyway. The thing to remember is that "using" FreeBSD isn't "learning" FreeBSD. Not in the sense of a cert program. I've been "using" FreeBSD for almost 5 years, but I'd be up the creek if I had to perform a major crash recovery. I just haven't gotten round to that yet. If you want a FreeBSD cert, find the goals list of any major Unix cert program, learn how to do that on FreeBSD (on at least two major releases, like 4.10 and 5.3) then do it a lot. That's your cert, but it's really a self signed cert. If you did all the work, it's every bit as good as the one you'd have paid $2850 for, but there's no fancy plaque to hang up (unless you make it yourself) and nobody has to honor it - not that they *have* to place much stock in the MS or Sun certs. Good luck. Lou -- Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD@keyslapper.org Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org Ô¿Ô¬ Alexander Graham Bell is alive and well in New York, and still waiting for a dial tone. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 02:07:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7081E16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:07:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F5F43D31 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:07:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631F369A3F; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:07:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:07:19 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: ctodd@chrismiller.com Message-Id: <20050102210719.2699f5e6.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20050102100949.6d0822d5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0rc (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: write state to swap for multi-os boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:07:22 -0000 ctodd@chrismiller.com wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Bill Moran wrote: > > > But it's a great way to boot Linux under Windows, or FreeBSD under > > either, or have multiple OSes running simultaneously under a single > > computer. > > How good is device support from within vmware? Can I get to > serial/usb/audio/network ports seamlessly? I can't speak for all of those, but audio and network seem fine. I haven't really experimented with usb/serial yet, but I would expect support for both of them to be very good. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 02:14:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9B916A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:14:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cms-stl.com (smtp.cms-stl.com [192.94.149.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B062F43D3F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:14:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from madden@cmsrtp.com) Message-ID: <41D8AA66.50809@cmsrtp.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:13:58 -0600 From: Michael Madden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> <20050102153511.J38996@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20050102153511.J38996@wonkity.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMS-Received: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:13:58 -0600, [192.168.2.2] (port=46426 helo=[192.168.2.2]) X-CMS-Authenticated-User: madden X-CMS-Archived: smtp.cms-stl.com X-CMS-Scanned: Sophos Anti-Virus X-CMS-Received: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:13:59 -0600, localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:58210 helo=lxmail.cms-stl.com) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: madden@cmsrtp.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on smtp.cms-stl.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:14:02 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > So have other MTAs, including one for Postfix not so long ago. Sendmail > configuration can be charitably called "odd", but it's so widely used > that answers can usually be found on google or groups.google.com. Then > there's comp.mail.sendmail, and sendmail.org, the bat book, and even > sendmail.com. FYI: With help from a decent tutorial for sendmail at http://www.technoids.org/freebsdsendmailfaqs.html and some detailed explanation from the bad book, I got sendmail setup fine. I found the tutorial to be a good initial walk through, and the bat book was a great reference. Thanks for all the suggestions, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 02:29:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B592416A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:29:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53608.mail.yahoo.com (web53608.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 435DC43D1D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:29:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flexble2547@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 38411 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jan 2005 02:29:02 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=BIUhy48GL23dy4W+78QIzTLtFZlJCQh8/HHcTCJHcqvv/exMZi43kOuCY7IXjYonXG5ieJR+TJ9K9TvZVIAZqfEuCRIrk4j60zjEGkA3JHBQe1mNZxaLBXndcDBD64lrIlXVR79M9364i/EWbbxyIBfgStF1k9/kJOvMfBt1K/k= ; Message-ID: <20050103022902.38409.qmail@web53608.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.100.166.16] by web53608.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:29:02 PST Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 18:29:02 -0800 (PST) From: scott renna To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: NDISAPI in the kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:29:03 -0000 Hello list, I saw another user post about issues compiling in ndis support into the kernel for FreeBSD 5.3. I'm also having an issue. I've gotten both if_ndis and ndis kernel modules to load and I have connectivity to the box, but I'd like to have ndis be permanent. I've added the following to my kernel: options NDISAPI device ndis device wlan (this was already present in the default) Here's the issue I run into: make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP="cc -E" CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis.c:85:30: ndis_driver_data.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis_pci.c:65:30: ndis_driver_data.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 the file, ndis_driver_data.h is present in: /usr/src/sys/compat/ndis/ndis_driver_data.h /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/ndis_driver_data.h /usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis/ndis_driver_data.h Where else might i put a copy of this file so the kernel can build itself? Thanks, Scott __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 02:50:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A1716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:50:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54106.mail.yahoo.com (web54106.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEB0643D39 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:50:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saigon_ca@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 63129 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jan 2005 02:50:48 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=lxFEE7KGqwtO2OVwshWhJwXjTx+4Bae2dMQha8kUEATh/YKop5di7kwZl1U3KP1qNwwLg6noNkBDNJVwqVZoL57+pfJovZZydgZBZD5tG2M7eJ+Qt++ghtCLAlWvRTp3VylpnUJDzMwW/A9w7nAQ2LLkfXoNZYUOALly2E7xkgE= ; Message-ID: <20050103025048.63127.qmail@web54106.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.228.92.26] by web54106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:50:48 CST Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:50:48 +0800 (CST) From: Kangaroo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Help on Compaq Laptop Presario 3000 AMD Athlon 64 -Nvida-gforce3 chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:50:49 -0000 I need help on instaling freebsd 5.3 AMD64 on my lap top. When I boot from cd rom, The system boot up to menu screen show 1...7 where 2 eg. boot with disable ACPI... My system automatically shutdown when I press any key from 1 or 7 or just press enter. I mean it SHUTDOWN my machine. What is wrong... I have follow the instruction from the web I need to disbale some IO.. from BIOS. But my bios has no option to do that. Is any one has the same LAPTOP I have? HELP!!! Thanks saigon_ca@yahoo.com Khai From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 02:50:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BC516A4E1 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:50:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [64.2.229.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854BA43D2F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:50:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (AnonyMouse@viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j032omvx050463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:50:49 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <41D8B307.1090003@tundraware.com> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:50:47 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com Subject: Problems With 'make release' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:50:55 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I cannot get make release to run. I am trying to do RELENG_4 release off of up to date stable sources. After a couple hours of running, I get: cc -O -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -I/usr/src/sys/boot/ficl -I/usr/src/sys/boot/ficl/i386 - -I/usr/src/sys/boot/ficl/../common -DFICL_TRACE -c softcore.c -o softcore.o building static ficl library ranlib libficl.a ===> sys/boot/i386 ===> sys/boot/i386/mbr as -o mbr.o /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/mbr/mbr.s ld -N -e start -Ttext 0x600 -o mbr.out mbr.o objcopy -S -O binary mbr.out mbr ===> sys/boot/i386/boot0 make: don't know how to make boot0.s. Stop *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 Ideas Anyone? - -- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB2LMFyjgA+Mact+YRAqLTAJ4tnpA1IFrhS1KaTHmp+8DrM8S4lACgzrKJ jAnzbytoFzNbx76v3IQJAJk= =wyJB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 04:16:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F5416A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 04:16:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AC8C43D46 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 04:16:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jan 2005 04:16:11 -0000 Received: from p508A593D.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO localhost) (80.138.89.61) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 03 Jan 2005 05:16:11 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5114400 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 05:19:49 +0100 From: Mario Hoerich To: Alex Teslik Message-ID: <20050103041948.GA519@Pandora.MHoerich.de> References: <20041229075228.M12628@acatysmoof.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041229075228.M12628@acatysmoof.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: user not organized X-OS: 5.3FreeBSD X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ld-elf __lxstat undefined symbol X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:16:14 -0000 # Alex Teslik: [ mplayer fails on realaudio ] > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/win32/sipr.so.6.0: Undefined > symbol "__lxstat" [...] > don't know where I can find the __lxstat symbol and get it into the ld-elf > linker library. Any ideas? Well, let's have a look at the library itself: $ objdump -T /usr/local/lib/win32/sipr.so.6.0 | grep __lx 00000000 DF *UND* 00000137 GLIBC_2.0 __lxstat $ objdump -T /usr/compat/linux/lib/libc-2.2.4.so | grep __lx 000d8824 g DF .text 0000019f (GLIBC_2.1) __lxstat64 000d8144 g DF .text 00000326 GLIBC_2.0 __lxstat 000d8824 g DF .text 0000019f GLIBC_2.2 __lxstat64 I think this belongs to the linux_base-port, does updating it fix your problem? HTH, Mario From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 04:16:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1487816A4D2 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 04:16:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773F843D4C for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 04:16:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from BARTON (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.rr.com [65.184.201.54]) j034GFkc007958 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:16:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:21:27 +0000 From: jason henson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Balsa 2.2.6 Message-Id: <1104726087l.89396l.0l@BARTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: rtc wants more hz! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 04:16:19 -0000 I found this old thread on it: =20 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-April/026160.html If I raise the hz option in my kernel config will it adversely affect =20 anything else like network performance? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 07:04:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D995816A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:04:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A98743D46 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:04:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 26012 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2005 23:04:16 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 2 Jan 2005 23:04:16 -0800 Message-ID: <41D8EE59.9090909@taborandtashell.net> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:03:53 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <41D895A4.5080100@codegurus.org> <41D89950.6000201@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <41D89950.6000201@makeworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Jayton Garnett cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd training/certification X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:04:20 -0000 Chris wrote: > The user states, "I have been using the OS for over a year now", Hmmm > seems to me that the user should KNOW the answer to, "and how come > FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora?" Please, enlighten me, why is FreeBSD less popular than RH/Fedora, or linux in general for that matter? -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 07:07:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5141716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:07:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C434743D1D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:07:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 26028 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2005 23:07:22 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 2 Jan 2005 23:07:22 -0800 Message-ID: <41D8EF18.5010504@taborandtashell.net> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 23:07:04 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 and some icons broke in Window Maker 0.91.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:07:25 -0000 Hello, I just upgraded from Xorg 6.7.0 (where everything worked fine) to Xorg 6.8.1 and my clip icon along with a few others have a black background. Here is a screenshot: http://tabor.taborandtashell.net/images/outfile.jpg Is anybody else having this trouble with Xorg 6.8.1? Everything else works fine. Of note: I have an Intel i810 video chipset and Xorg 6.8.1 "broke" the driver for it, but I set NoAccel in my xorg.conf file and that was supposed to take care of it (now X at least starts). Does anyone think this could be related to my specific hardware? Note2: This is on an ia32 laptop running FreeBSD 5.3R. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 07:18:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4FA16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:18:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailhost.frm2.tum.de (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDB843D45 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:18:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joerg.Pulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from localhost (mailhost.frm2.tum.de [129.187.179.12]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j037Ie3w012718; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:18:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (hades.admin.frm2 [172.25.1.10]) by mailhost.frm2.tum.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j037IZQx012714 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:18:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: from hades.admin.frm2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j037IZcL005242; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:18:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz@frm2.tum.de) Received: (from jpulz@localhost) by hades.admin.frm2 (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j037IXRZ005241; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:18:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jpulz) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:18:30 +0100 (CET) From: Joerg Pulz To: Tabor Kelly In-Reply-To: <41D8EF18.5010504@taborandtashell.net> Message-ID: <20050103081305.E7096@hades.admin.frm2> References: <41D8EF18.5010504@taborandtashell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: at mailhost.frm2.tum.de cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 and some icons broke in Window Maker 0.91.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:18:45 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Tabor Kelly wrote: > Hello, > > I just upgraded from Xorg 6.7.0 (where everything worked fine) to Xorg 6.8.1 > and my clip icon along with a few others have a black background. Here is a > screenshot: http://tabor.taborandtashell.net/images/outfile.jpg > > Is anybody else having this trouble with Xorg 6.8.1? Everything else works > fine. > > Of note: I have an Intel i810 video chipset and Xorg 6.8.1 "broke" the driver > for it, but I set NoAccel in my xorg.conf file and that was supposed to take > care of it (now X at least starts). Does anyone think this could be related > to my specific hardware? > > Note2: This is on an ia32 laptop running FreeBSD 5.3R. i got the same problem here. it seems to be a problem with the proper display of TIFF icons. Workaround: change all TIFF icons to the XPM equivalent. maybe someone with deeper windowmaker knowledge can help to find a real solution. regards Joerg - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2PHJSPOsGF+KA+MRAnvfAKDHsUEM9MibU+zQ++1KTcy9bupxaACeNjkH X4niuWRIUSJ/J50RYSNmliw= =hoHy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 07:34:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEA016A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:34:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C78143D2F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:33:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id j037XvO13295 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:33:57 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:33:57 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41D8EF18.5010504@taborandtashell.net> Message-ID: References: <41D8EF18.5010504@taborandtashell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 and some icons broke in Window Maker 0.91.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:34:01 -0000 On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Tabor Kelly wrote: > Of note: I have an Intel i810 video chipset and Xorg 6.8.1 "broke" the > driver for it, but I set NoAccel in my xorg.conf file and that was > supposed to take care of it (now X at least starts). Does anyone think > this could be related to my specific hardware? Could be; grab the latest Xorg from CVS, as a fix to the 810 driver (6.8.1_1) was committed yesterday. -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 08:17:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F83C16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:17:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vs3.bgnett.no (vs3.bgnett.no [194.54.96.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AA643D1D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:17:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no.bgnett.no (amidala.datadok.no [194.54.103.98]) by vs3.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j038HF5n089042 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:17:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Sender: peter@amidala.datadok.no To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: 03 Jan 2005 09:16:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> Message-ID: <86sm5judu2.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:17:23 -0000 Michael Madden writes: > I'm looking to setup a mail server with FreeBSD 5.3 for a group of around > 100 users, and I was wondering which MTA I should use. I have noticed > sendmail is the default MTA, but I have no sendmail experience. Also I know > historically sendmail has had some serious security issues. Since nobody else so far has mentioned exim - that's what I use on my mail servers (FreeBSD and OpenBSD). On FreeBSD and elsewhere it's an easy install from ports, and it comes with a fairly human-readable configuration file which comes out of the default install fairly well commented. If you read and follow the port's onscreen directions, you'll end up with a fairly good spam+worm filtering setup for your mail as well. IME a low-maintainence, high-reliability option. > Furthermore, can someone recommend a decent POP3 and IMAP server? There are several good ones in ports. imap-uw is very easy to set up. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 08:23:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277E516A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:23:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C09C43D2F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:23:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so209888rne for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:23:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Fr8/b0F8XuG45YbSeqlafR4yAXU6Zsjv0ufdcqtoMvn/0atM/xgsTRg+UiTV/gGgyMZx3Ae6dSnHi12nq/iijL2iFLRB9/R94oehJGNN8Lcy+GbXqhoIs8L4NBCXZs/lgefj0wFivg9XlhvZoib9QOH3brA8oG3VZ7vUYDm8tVs= Received: by 10.38.75.80 with SMTP id x80mr664164rna; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:23:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.66.67 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:23:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <235b800005010300233341def0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:23:07 +0200 From: tethys ocean To: FreeBSD_Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: defered mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tethys ocean List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:23:09 -0000 My problem is about defered mail. On our server sendmail is running and sometimes some mail defered. I am researching how I can get managed to send defer mail information to senders? I am taking a mail from root but sender didnt take a mail that consist "your mail defered bla bla bla....so I will take next tree minutes".. is it possible? if it is possible how I can manage? in sendmail.cf O Timeout.queuereturn=2d O Timeout.queuewarn=4h O Timeout.queuewarn.normal=4h mailq /var/spool/mqamavis (5 requests) -----Q-ID----- --Size-- -----Q-Time----- ------------Sender/Recipient----------- iBVC8fpT049046- 6361 Fri Dec 31 14:12 (host map: lookup (bbscomputer.net): deferred) iBVCIB9u051147- 6361 Fri Dec 31 14:21 (host map: lookup (bbscomputer.net): deferred) iBVDjmck072838- 19579 Fri Dec 31 15:46 (host map: lookup (gesan.com.tr): deferred) iBV68HLM055154- 30 Fri Dec 31 08:08 (host map: lookup (active.net): deferred) iBVAnlhq030740- 354708 Fri Dec 31 12:49 (host map: lookup (jungletree.org): deferred) Total requests: 5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 08:31:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B5116A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:31:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E70B43D39 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:31:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j038Vkj15941; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:31:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Jayton Garnett" , Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:31:46 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <41D895A4.5080100@codegurus.org> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: freebsd training/certification X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:31:52 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jayton Garnett > Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 4:45 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: freebsd training/certification > > > Hello, > > I am wondering if there are any training/certification courses that I > could take to become a FreeBSD guru? The only one I know was discussed here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-August/056525.html With a link here: http://cpe.njit.edu/opensourceunix/ But I must warn you it is non-credit, non-accredited. It's also quite a bit more costly than going down to the local community college. Nor do they guarentee to make you a "guru" Of course, the other vendor certifications, such as that from Microsoft, are also non-credit, non-accredited, and have no guarentee to make you a guru either. > > I have been using the OS for over a year now and have become very > familiar with installation/configuration but would like to be able to > add some sort of certification to my CV. There is really no point in doing that. The above course might be good to train you, but it's value as a pure "sheepskin" is nonexistent. You might as easily make up a certificate on a desktop publishing program if that is all you want it for. Certifications, ie: non-accredited coursework, are primariarly valuable in accordance to the 'brand' they carry. With all due respect to NJIT, nobody has heard of the "FreeBSD Certificate" they offer. By contrast, a MCSE, well everyone has heard of Microsoft and thus one of those certificates is much more valuable. If you want to spend your money on coursework, spend it on accredited courses that are transferable to any college or university. > Also how much of a "threat" is Solaris 10 x86 to FreeBSD None. Two different markets. People buy Solaris because they need it to run commercial programs (typically UNIX binaries) that require it. People setup FreeBSD because they need a UNIX that runs UNIX source code programs. While it is possible to compile Open Source programs on Solaris (indeed, Sun has already done this for many of the popular ones) speaking as an admin that runs a shop that does this in production, there is little point in doing it. Both Solaris and FreeBSD run whatever open source software you want to run well enough for production. But Sun isn't going to support an Open Source program that you compile on their operating system, unless you have purchased the Sun compiler, the Sun development tools and have a Sun service contract, and very few shops do this as it is quite costly. We don't do it and to be honest the only reason we do run Solaris in production is that one of the admins here is more comfortable with it than with FreeBSD. Since the application that runs on it is his responsibility and I have no desire to micromanage, it runs Solaris. > and how come > FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora? > Because of the same reason that Microsoft booted Apple out of the personal computer market. It was a favorable congruence of factors. None of the people who are the recognized 'movers and shakers' in this deal, such as Bob Young, really had any idea at the time that they were doing the Right Things. Bob isn't any different than 99% of businessman walking around today except that he was extremely lucky. Very much the Bill Gates story. It is easy now to look back and realize that 1996 and 1997 were 'nexus' years for Open Source. Bob got involved in Linux years earlier not because Linux was better but simply because the first people to show him Open Source UNIX happened to be running Linux. If they had been running FreeBSD then today FreeBSD would be the darling of the trade rags. Or, if someone else had been doing the same thing in 1996 and 1997 with FreeBSD, then today FreeBSD and Linux would be equivalent in the trade rags. These years were critical for UNIX primariarly because of Windows 95 coming out with a usable TCP/IP stack. Prior to Windows 95, TCP/IP on a desktop OS was expensive, the IP stacks at that time cost more than DOS or Windows. Once Windows 95 came out with TCP/IP (and to a lesser extent, Windows for Workgroups 3.11) it in conjunction with SAMBA cracked the door to an alternative server OS. Here's a list of all the things that came together in 1996-1997 that brought Linux and to a lesser extent FreeBSD, into the realm of commercial alternatives for server operating systems: 1) The failure of Novell with Netware 4 2) A free TCP/IP stack with Windows for Workgroups 3.11 and Windows 95 3) 32bit desktop computing in Win95 which got rid of the argument between the networking stack and the applications in the desktop PC over system resources, and allowed very large and complex networking stacks (which TCP/IP is) on desktop PCs 4) The explosion of the Internet and huge demand for IP-aware applications 5) Microsoft didn't have a usable e-mail and web server solution for Windows NT 3.5.1 and 4.0 6) Microsoft didn't drop the cost of their server products to freeze out Open Source (and still hasn't which is the principle reason that industry even considers open source to this day) Note that Microsoft has had no problems giving away free web browser and now streaming viewer software in order to consolidate their hold on those markets. 7) The failure of Apple to abandon MacOS and go to UNIX as a base OS during this time (this eventually happened as we all know, but too late) 8) The failure of all the AT&T UNIX source licensees to recognize that the key UNIX Open Source applications that people wanted to run (web servers, ftp servers, e-mail, etc.) were at production quality level, and to leverage this fact to increase the market of their UNIX products. This eventually happened at least with Sun who for several years gave away Solaris server licenses for free, and even today sells the base Solaris OS for a tenth of what they charged in 1996. 9) The fact that in order to maintain backwards compatability Microsoft was forced to retain all the "workgroup style" NetBIOS networking code in Windows, which allowed SAMBA to become a player. And finally, one of the big motivators was the dot-com boom which put what was obscenly high competitive pressures on the startup ISP's at the time - the ISP's that tried to build systems the old-fashioned-way, with Solaris servers and such, had far too high overhead to compete with the startup ISP's who used FreeBSD and Linux. Because most of the startup ISPs were run by technical gurus (nobody else around knew anything about how the Internet worked) a huge amount of work was poured into both Linux and FreeBSD at that time. By the time that the FreeBSD Project tried taking things more commercial with the Walnut Creek/BSDI merger, it was 4 years later and it was too late for it. Not to mention that by then, the normal business cycle of boom/bust had started heading down. The 90's were an extremely high boom period for technology, and as the saying goes, the higher you climb the harder you fall, and a serious bust was imminent. The US election putting a deficit spender in the White House followed by 9-11 further worsened the economic crisis in technology. It is important to realize today, however, that the story is still unfolding. Microsoft is still the 900 pound gorilla in the commercial realm and they are still sufficiently unpredictable to know what they are going to do in the future. We are also still going through a shakeout in the technology industry and most businesses are being very conservative on new IT projects and on changing things around. This probably won't change much for another 3 years. People had a lot of changes in 1995-2000 and overall they aren't interested in going through this again, they would rather coast for awhile. By 2010-2015 a lot of the old guard by then will be retired and out of the loop and we will be dealing with a really fscked up economy with the baby boomers and there's going to be a need for businesses to look at new ways of doing things in order to survive. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 08:46:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528FC16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:46:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79D843D45 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:46:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j038kej15996; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:46:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "Chris" Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:46:40 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <41D8EE59.9090909@taborandtashell.net> Importance: Normal cc: Jayton Garnett cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: freebsd training/certification X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:46:51 -0000 Because if you are a software publisher you make a lot more money selling software applications written for Red Hat than for FreeBSD. And since the software publishers and hardware vendors are the major advertisers in the computing press trade ragazines, and the hardware vendors don't care about the Windows vs FreeBSD vs Linux debate and make money from all of us, over this issue the software publishers are going to influence every column written, every survey taken, every interview published and every so-called news article on the subject. Of course the real truth is that nobody knows how many Linux systems compared to FreeBSD systems are in production. But from the industries point of view, the only counts that matter are those of SALES of operating systems. Red Hat doesen't get any more credit for downloads of the older versions of RedHat or of Fedora from the trade press than we get for downloads of FreeBSD. I might point out however that numbers aren't everything. There were far more Volkswagen Beetles sold than there have been Corvettes, but you might consider that the Corvette is still in production, as is the Mustang, while the Bug is little more than a piece of history. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tabor Kelly > Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 11:04 PM > To: Chris > Cc: Jayton Garnett; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: freebsd training/certification > > > Chris wrote: > > > > > The user states, "I have been using the OS for over a year now", Hmmm > > seems to me that the user should KNOW the answer to, "and how come > > FreeBSD is not as popular as RH/Fedora?" > > Please, enlighten me, why is FreeBSD less popular than RH/Fedora, or > linux in general for that matter? > > -- > > Tabor Kelly > tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net > http://tabor.taborandtashell.net > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 08:58:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A5416A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:58:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se (pernis.its.UU.SE [130.238.4.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF6B43D31 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:58:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 21F97208; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:58:34 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by pernis.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s367; Mon, 3 Jan 05 09:58:32 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549D0E4; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:58:32 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 4EF3138013; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:58:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA755C002; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:58:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:58:32 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: Sergei Gnezdov In-Reply-To: <1104714423.63517.39.camel@owl2> Message-ID: References: <1104714423.63517.39.camel@owl2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: Questions FreeBSD Subject: Re: Mailing Lists (and high volumes) vs Newsgroups X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:58:37 -0000 On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > Although I've been using FreeBSD for several years, I have not been > active with mailing lists at all. I preferred to use newsgroups search > and a little bit of posting. > > I am wondering, why mailing list is the official support mechanism (as > opposed to newsgroups)? Ruby seems to be supported through newsgroups > quite nicely. You mention Gnus as your newsreader. Try using it for mail then. It's quite workable. Then you get all the benefits of news that you need. /Andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 09:02:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F250A16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:02:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6040943D3F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:02:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 259714910; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:22 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s3923; Mon, 3 Jan 05 10:02:17 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB4348FF for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:17 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 5D65338013; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E565C002 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:02:17 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Problem compiling gcc3.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:02:25 -0000 Hi! On my FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE GENERIC (yeah, I will upgrade soon) I can't get the gcc3.4 port to compile. Unless I'm mistaken, gcc3.4 is used for 5.3 nowdays. Do I dare to upgrade to 5.3 or do I have the chance of ending up with a broken compiler? Or, is it just that the port is broken for 5.2? I haven't found any hints in UPDATING. /Andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 09:37:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D7F16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:37:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7099E43D45 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:37:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2/d) with ESMTP id j039areU022412 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 03:36:53 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 03:36:53 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:37:10 -0000 Apparently, I'm going to have to install 5.3 even before I get 5.2.1 into usable shape in order to be able to try NDIS. Sigh. I've downloaded the following ISO image files: 5.3-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso I've also tried burning the first file to CD-Rs using Windows XP Home's own facilities and using Sonic RecordNow! under said system, but did not get bootable CDs either way. I also tried mounting the Windows partition onto /mnt under 5.2.1 and using the burncd command to burn the first file onto a CD-RW and, later, the second file onto a CD-RW. Neither attempt gave me a bootable CD. I've also looked in the _FreeBSD_Handbook_ that came with the 5.2.1 CDs, but did not find explicit instructions on how to make bootable CDs, just some limited instructions on making bootable floppies. If someone would be so kind as to email me instructions on how best to make bootable CDs for 5.3-RELEASE, I'd really appreciate it. (There's probably no need to post them to the list.) Over a month has passed, and I still don't have a usable FreeBSD system (no wireless networking, no graphics support). It's getting to be really depressing. Thanks in advance for any help you can send. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 09:41:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF9716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:41:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (joel.tallye.com [216.99.199.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999D243D2D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:41:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lorenl@alzatex.com) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (hosea.tallye.com [127.0.0.1]) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j039fCYs010030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:41:12 -0800 Received: (from sttng359@localhost) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10/Submit) id j039fBG7010028; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:41:11 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: hosea.tallye.com: sttng359 set sender to lorenl@alzatex.com using -f Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:41:11 -0800 From: "Loren M. Lang" To: rsh Message-ID: <20050103094111.GF14949@alzatex.com> References: <41D5D092.6030401@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41D5D092.6030401@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Passing options to a 'make install clean' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:41:32 -0000 On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 05:20:02PM -0500, rsh wrote: > I am trying to 'make install clean' of openoffice and do not want to > install Java. > > I have tried several things to say no to Java but it always wants to try > to install jdk14, and this port is not user friendly with my amd64 system. > > So how can I install openoffice without Java? What about just installing a precompiled package of openoffice instead? I don't think you need java or gcc to be installed for that. Try pkg_add -r openoffice-1.1 or portinstall -PP editors/openoffice-1.1 if you have portupgrade installed. Also, amd64 should be able to run all i386 programs just as well as a real i386 machine can, maybe defined CPUTYPE to i686 or something will allow you to build java, gcc, and openoffice. There is also a freebsd package of openoffice available on their site I believe. > > Thanks > Sean > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 09:45:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D2916A4CF for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:45:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (joel.tallye.com [216.99.199.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B033C43D4C for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:45:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lorenl@alzatex.com) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (hosea.tallye.com [127.0.0.1]) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j039jTYs010167 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:45:30 -0800 Received: (from sttng359@localhost) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10/Submit) id j039jTuR010165 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:45:29 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: hosea.tallye.com: sttng359 set sender to lorenl@alzatex.com using -f Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:45:29 -0800 From: "Loren M. Lang" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050103094529.GG14949@alzatex.com> References: <20041230120111.953ED16A502@hub.freebsd.org> <20041231050954.12686.qmail@gawab.com> <41D4E663.60206@nbritton.org> <20041231202903.27382.qmail@gawab.com> <20041231204224.GA40891@keyslapper.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041231204224.GA40891@keyslapper.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C Subject: Re: nvidia display driver problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:45:32 -0000 On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 03:42:24PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > This actually goes much better if you just install from the ports. > That's what I'm using and other than the configuration hoops, it works > perfectly. > > Have you verified that the GeForce4 is supported? My GeForce 440 MX runs great in Freebsd. To install the port just do: cd /usr/ports/x11/nvidia-driver && make install > > Lou > On 12/31/04 08:29 PM, Emon sat at the `puter and typed: > > > > > > Hello every one > > > > I am a nwebie and I am trying to install the nvidia driver for > > my (GeForce4 MX 440) display card. I running Freebsd 4.10 > > > > I have downloaded the driver from nvidia website but i am unable > > to install it, I am pasting the output after I tried to "make > > install". > > > > *************************** > > Magic-Box# make install > > ===> src > > install -o root -g wheel -m 555 nvidia.ko /modules > > ===> lib > > find: /compat/linux/lib: No such file or directory > > find: /compat/linux/usr/lib: No such file or directory > > find: /compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib: No such file or directory > > ===> lib/libGL > > ===> lib/libnvidia-tls > > ===> lib/libGLcore > > ===> lib/libXvMCNVIDIA > > ===> lib/compat > > ===> lib/compat/libGL > > install: /compat/linux/usr/lib: No such file or directory > > *** Error code 71 > > Stop in /root/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-6113/lib/compat/libGL. > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /root/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-6113/lib/compat. > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /root/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-6113/lib. > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /root/NVIDIA-FreeBSD-x86-1.0-6113. > > Magic-Box# > > ********************** > > > > I hardly have any clue to what the above lines mean > > > > Any sugession or pointer will be welcome > > --------------------------------------------- > > Free POP3 Email from www.Gawab.com > > Sign up NOW and get your account @gawab.com!! > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD@keyslapper.org > Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) > http://www.keyslapper.org ???? > > Statistics means never having to say you're certain. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 09:46:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CA716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:46:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [217.122.132.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DF443D3F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:46:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:46:21 +0100 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:46:21 +0100 To: Scott Bennett Message-ID: <20050103094621.GA8348@nagual.st> References: <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: dick hoogendijk cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:46:23 -0000 On 03 Jan Scott Bennett wrote: > 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso > > I've also tried burning the first file to CD-Rs using Windows XP Home's own > facilities and using Sonic RecordNow! under said system, but did not get > bootable CDs either way. Strange. Every decent burning program on windows (cdrwin, nero) has an option to burn iso _images_ to a cdr(w). Because it is an image(!) the cdr(w) will be bootable (it's an image of a bootable cd). -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.10 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 09:48:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC1416A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:48:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1103843D1D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:48:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so221505rne for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:48:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=n5UGmU50ADWXdWy1XZuuyAhrqGNs5656O4eYHTQ8TooJGgtf9nX5UJ9jwwEUcbutTEoyheMXf/pkzg7Q30peG5VItfnRliwF/rvfN+84CC4oFXuNmXWqR4PFlAHRSO9RXPcY0OvqmoQ+eFGKOvsiTHTvsi3CZUO+12hf91UhPGY= Received: by 10.38.15.52 with SMTP id 52mr482232rno; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 01:48:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.101.3 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:48:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 03:48:50 -0600 From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: "ctodd@chrismiller.com" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041227083502.2d865466.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20050102100949.6d0822d5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> cc: Bill Moran cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: write state to swap for multi-os boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eric Kjeldergaard List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:48:53 -0000 > > But it's a great way to boot Linux under Windows, or FreeBSD under > > either, or have multiple OSes running simultaneously under a single > > computer. > > How good is device support from within vmware? Can I get to > serial/usb/audio/network ports seamlessly? Well, these things aren't exactly seamless, but they are doable. In (all?) of these cases, the access to the host's resources are done indirectly via drivers and emulated hardware. An exception to this is USB which can (I think) be done directly allowing a client to utilise the USB devices of the host regardless of the support of the individual device by the host. As far as network, it can be natted or bridged from the controller, and audio is done as a sound device driver that just streams the sound to the parent's sound mechanism. -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 09:53:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3C916A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:53:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15FEB43D39 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:53:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ph.schulz@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Jan 2005 09:53:21 -0000 Received: from dsl-082-082-078-080.arcor-ip.net (EHLO [192.168.1.5]) (82.82.78.80) by mail.gmx.net (mp025) with SMTP; 03 Jan 2005 10:53:21 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1954550 Message-ID: <41D915FF.1090707@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:53:03 +0100 From: Phil Schulz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041121 X-Accept-Language: de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Trey Sizemore References: <1104696792.806.6.camel@localhost> <1104715334.806.11.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1104715334.806.11.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why might my USB devices *not* be detected? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:53:24 -0000 On 01/03/05 02:22, Trey Sizemore wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 15:13 -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote: > > > Sorry for replying to myself, but wanted to fix the subject (less > confusing). Might this have something to do with the usbd.conf file > (I've not changed mine, but perhaps something to be added?). > What happens if you plug in the device(s) before you boot the system? On my laptop, USB devices were only detected when the system booted, not when it was already up. That issue was solved by compiling ehci into the kernel. If that doesn't help, you might want to show your dmesg. Regards, Phil. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 10:06:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A3116A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:06:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from motgate7.mot.com (motgate7.mot.com [129.188.136.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5D443D1D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonathan.begg@motorola.com) Received: from az33exr04.mot.com (pobox4.mot.com [10.64.251.243]) by motgate7.mot.com (Motorola/Motgate7) with ESMTP id j039v8ba008528 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 02:57:08 -0700 (MST) Received: from zuk28exm04.ecid.cig.mot.com (zuk28exm04.ecid.cig.mot.com [10.128.69.71])j03A4YR9011422 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 04:04:35 -0600 Received: by zuk28exm04.ecid.cig.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:05:59 -0000 Message-ID: <09C1525B7197D3118A4D0008C7E6EEE011E6B6C2@zuk28exm05.ecid.cig.mot.com> From: Begg Jonathan-BGGJ001 To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:05:58 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Hi X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:06:03 -0000 I'll be back in the office on Monday the 10th of January and will read your mail then. Regards, Jonathan. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 10:08:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4109E16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:08:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmailm1.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailm1.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D2943D31 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:08:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: from modem-3873.karuhiruhi.dialup.pol.co.uk ([81.78.143.33]) by cmailm1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1ClP8V-0003TC-8U for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:08:27 +0000 Message-ID: <41D9199B.6070001@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:08:27 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions References: <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu> <20050103094621.GA8348@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050103094621.GA8348@nagual.st> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:08:29 -0000 dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 03 Jan Scott Bennett wrote: > > >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso >> >>I've also tried burning the first file to CD-Rs using Windows XP Home's own >>facilities and using Sonic RecordNow! under said system, but did not get >>bootable CDs either way. > > > Strange. Every decent burning program on windows (cdrwin, nero) has an > option to burn iso _images_ to a cdr(w). Because it is an image(!) the > cdr(w) will be bootable (it's an image of a bootable cd). > Sonic RecordNow 7.10 as given away by Dell doesn't have an option to burn ISO images. Absolutely stupid, made me furious. -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 10:49:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D0616A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:49:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B722A43D1D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:49:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id j03AnRP13608 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:49:27 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:49:26 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu> Message-ID: References: <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:49:31 -0000 On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Scott Bennett wrote: > I've also tried burning the first file to CD-Rs using Windows XP Home's > own facilities and using Sonic RecordNow! under said system, but did not > get bootable CDs either way. I also tried mounting the Windows > partition onto /mnt under 5.2.1 and using the burncd command to burn the > first file onto a CD-RW and, later, the second file onto a CD-RW. > Neither attempt gave me a bootable CD. What, exactly, was your "burncd" command? Using 4.10 to create 5.3 CDs, this "just worked", using write-once CDs: burncd -f /dev/acd0c data /var/tmp/cd.iso fixate -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 11:51:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F6916A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:51:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chifon.propagation.net (chifon.propagation.net [66.221.8.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C36B43D1F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:51:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sujit@rebaca.com) Received: from nile (static61.11.71-18.dsl-cal.eth.net [61.11.71.18] (may be forged)) by chifon.propagation.net (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with SMTP id j03BpQZ08358 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 05:51:26 -0600 From: "Sujit" To: Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:21:29 +0530 Message-ID: <00fa01c4f18b$3332ec60$4101140a@nile> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2462.0000 Importance: Normal Subject: notification of time changed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: sujit@rebaca.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 11:51:20 -0000 Is there interface or call back function to get the notification of time changed, either through NTP or manually in freebsd? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 12:38:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4923D16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:38:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vs3.bgnett.no (vs3.bgnett.no [194.54.96.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1910D43D2F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:38:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no.bgnett.no (amidala.datadok.no [194.54.103.98]) by vs3.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j03CcV5n085337 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:38:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Sender: peter@amidala.datadok.no To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050103025048.63127.qmail@web54106.mail.yahoo.com> From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: 03 Jan 2005 13:38:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20050103025048.63127.qmail@web54106.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <86d5wmvgag.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help on Compaq Laptop Presario 3000 AMD Athlon 64 -Nvida-gforce3 chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:38:53 -0000 Kangaroo writes: > I need help on instaling freebsd 5.3 AMD64 on my lap top. > > When I boot from cd rom, The system boot up to menu screen > show 1...7 where 2 eg. boot with disable ACPI... > My system automatically shutdown when I press any key from > 1 or 7 or just press enter. I mean it SHUTDOWN my machine. There is a possibility that the machine contains various components which are not fully supported in FreeBSD/amd64. What happens if you try booting FreeBSD/i386 instead? I know this may not be the most satisfying suggestion, but if it's that or not getting the machine to boot at all, well, there it is. I'd venture a guess that whichever software came with the machine originally is not quite 64 bit clean either. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 14:01:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D299816A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:01:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (174.113.sn.ct.dsl.thebiz.net [216.238.113.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25F343D1D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:01:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zlists@mgm51.com) Received: from XPMM (unknown [63.119.50.193]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5BABA2D0 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:00:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <200501030900450705.1844FB7F@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: <20050102203631.GA3765@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> <20050102203631.GA3765@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.00.1081 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:00:45 -0500 From: "MikeM" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:01:09 -0000 On 1/2/2005 at 2:36 PM Adam Fabian wrote: |On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 02:20:51PM -0600, Michael Madden wrote: |> have noticed sendmail is the default MTA, but I have no sendmail |> experience. Also I know historically sendmail has had some serious |> security issues. | |sendmail is also bundled with OpenBSD, which is proactively rabid about |security. ============= They are also rabid about licensing issues, which I suspect is more than likely the reason Postfix is not the default MTA and sendmail is. Also, sendmail is in send-only mode on OpenBSD, it does not receive mail from the outside by default. Having used sendmail, qmail and postifx, I can say that Postfix is the hands-down easiest to configure. Additionally, the support on the Postfix-users mailing list is excellent. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 14:12:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1F716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:12:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lp1001.snu.ac.kr (lp1001.snu.ac.kr [147.46.70.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2450043D45 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:12:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by lp1001.snu.ac.kr (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j03EA2HS027303 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:10:02 +0900 Message-ID: <41D952C2.1040708@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:12:18 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Samba on a router; doesn't work for outer network. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:12:20 -0000 Hi, I have tried to configure Samba on a FreeBSD (5.3) router & NAT. I want to have a single accessible directory with a password, that can be accessed from the inner network (10.0.0.X) as well as from the outer network (outer network = Windows PCs that use the same external router as the FreeBSD PC). It works for the inner network, but not for the outer network (see below for network scheme). All Windows PCs are XP. For testing this, I use an 'open' firewall. I should tighten the firewall as soon as this is working. The /usr/local/etc/smb.conf (configured with swat) is as follows: #------------ smb.conf ---------------------------------- [global] workgroup = CISR netbios name = SURFACE server string = FreeBSD Samba Server passdb backend = tdbsam log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 dns proxy = No ldap ssl = no [share] comment = Shared stuff path = /home/share invalid users = @wheel valid users = share read only = No force create mode = 0700 force security mode = 0700 #--------------------------------------------------------- The network scheme is as follows: |IP on outer network | |---------| | FreeBSD | |------------| | Router | | Switch | |---------| |------------| |10.0.0.1 | | | | | | | | \----------/ | | | | | 10.0.0.2 | | | 10.0.0.3 | 10.0.0.4 What could be blocking Samba on the outer network? What communication is essential for Samba to work on the outer network? What tests can I do on the router to find out what's going wrong? Thanks so much, Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 14:36:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D3616A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:36:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jail.idea-anvil.net (idea-anvil.net [63.226.12.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D60A43D39 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james@idea-anvil.net) Received: from mail.Idea-Anvil.net (vaio [10.0.0.99]) by jail.idea-anvil.net (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j03EaugY078364 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:36:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from james@idea-anvil.net) From: James Jhai To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:36:54 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <41D952C2.1040708@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <41D952C2.1040708@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501030736.55330.james@idea-anvil.net> Subject: Re: Samba on a router; doesn't work for outer network. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:36:57 -0000 On Monday 03 January 2005 07:12 am, Rob wrote: > > Hi, > > I have tried to configure Samba on a FreeBSD (5.3) router & NAT. > > I want to have a single accessible directory with a password, > that can be accessed from the inner network (10.0.0.X) as well > as from the outer network (outer network = Windows PCs that use > the same external router as the FreeBSD PC). > > It works for the inner network, but not for the outer network > (see below for network scheme). All Windows PCs are XP. > > For testing this, I use an 'open' firewall. I should tighten the > firewall as soon as this is working. > > The /usr/local/etc/smb.conf (configured with swat) is as follows: > > #------------ smb.conf ---------------------------------- > [global] > workgroup = CISR > netbios name = SURFACE > server string = FreeBSD Samba Server > passdb backend = tdbsam > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 50 > dns proxy = No > ldap ssl = no > > [share] > comment = Shared stuff > path = /home/share > invalid users = @wheel > valid users = share > read only = No > force create mode = 0700 > force security mode = 0700 > #--------------------------------------------------------- > > > The network scheme is as follows: > > |IP on outer network > | > |---------| > | FreeBSD | > |------------| | Router | > | Switch | |---------| > |------------| |10.0.0.1 > | | | | | > | | | \----------/ > | | | > | | 10.0.0.2 > | | > | 10.0.0.3 > | > 10.0.0.4 > > > What could be blocking Samba on the outer network? > What communication is essential for Samba to work on the outer network? > What tests can I do on the router to find out what's going wrong? > > Thanks so much, > Rob. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I belive you'll have to add the "interfaces" option and define all the interfaces that you want samba to use. You can use IP's or the interface names (rl0, wi0, ndis0, ed0, etc...). I think you will have to use the advanced option in swat to be able to define this. Swat will also have more details on this option in the "help". In addition to setting firewall rules up, samba also has a deny/allow section, again the swat help on the option will give you more details. -- - James From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 14:54:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F9716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:54:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pmihiv.hu (flora.pmihiv.hu [62.77.195.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644B143D1F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@pmihiv.hu) Received: from [172.17.3.23] (uuu.pmi [172.17.3.23]) by ujs.pmi (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j03C6Xpn054396 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:06:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@pmihiv.hu) Message-ID: <41D93287.8070105@pmihiv.hu> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:54:47 +0100 From: Sitkei Attila User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20041230175745.A151A16A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <41D455CF.2040802@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <41D455CF.2040802@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.7; AVE 6.29.0.5; VDF 6.29.0.39 Subject: Re: FreeBSD server(s) to backup multi-platform systems remotely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:54:16 -0000 >>> From a backup point of view, my goal... >> >> >> On a nightly and automated basis - to take a snapshot of all new and >> modified data from a FreeBSD server and Windows server. Then compress >> and hopefully encrypt the data and send it to a remote FreeBSD server >> through some form of efficient and secure file transfer. Uncompressed >> the nightly data may total ~20MB. > It is worth to take a look at http://www.fluffy.co.uk/boxbackup/, which is a tool focusing on automated (`lazy') or snapshot backup. Supported are most unices, there is no FreeBSD-port however. A windows' client utility is work in progress, though usable via cygwin now. Its main advantages: * backups via encrypted streams, public key infrastucture * only modified parts are to be transported * preserving the overwritten or deleted files * quota-support * userland RAID-option Have a nice day --tef From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 15:02:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F65216A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:02:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web30905.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30905.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B228D43D2F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:02:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcd_advisory@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20050103150205.60367.qmail@web30905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.28.117.23] by web30905.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:02:05 PST Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:02:05 -0800 (PST) From: Mervin McDougall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-407690730-1104764525=:60108" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Slow transition from X to vesa X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:02:09 -0000 --0-407690730-1104764525=:60108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Id: Content-Disposition: inline I recently applied a patch from current to adjust the console settings for my laptop(Compaq Presarion 2100). Previously, my consolewas limited to 1/3 rd of my screen, however due to the new current-vesa patch I can now view my console using the entire screen with only one problem. I have noticed that there is a small delay of two seconds when switching from X to my vesa consoles. Furethermore, I have noticed that if I am playing music via xmms whether through a shoutcast stream or an mp3 from my harddrive the music continues to play a small portion repeatedly until the vesa console comes up. That can be very irritating. The same happens for Xine I have attached a copy of my pci_configuration as well as a copy of the patch which I applied to my system. I hope that will be of some help. If you need any more information feel free to ask. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail --0-407690730-1104764525=:60108 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=pci_config Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: pci_config Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=pci_config aG9zdGIwQHBjaTA6MDowOgljbGFzcz0weDA2MDAwMCBjYXJkPTB4MDAwMDAw MDAgY2hpcD0weGNhYjAxMDAyIHJldj0weDEzIGhkcj0weDAwCiAgICB2ZW5k b3IgICA9ICdBVEkgVGVjaG5vbG9naWVzIEluYy4nCiAgICBkZXZpY2UgICA9 ICdBMy9VMSBTMksgQ1BVIHRvIFBDSSBCcmlkZ2UnCiAgICBjbGFzcyAgICA9 IGJyaWRnZQogICAgc3ViY2xhc3MgPSBIT1NULVBDSQpwY2liMUBwY2kwOjE6 MDoJY2xhc3M9MHgwNjA0MDAgY2FyZD0weDAwMDAwMDAwIGNoaXA9MHg3MDBm MTAwMiByZXY9MHgwMSBoZHI9MHgwMQogICAgdmVuZG9yICAgPSAnQVRJIFRl Y2hub2xvZ2llcyBJbmMuJwogICAgZGV2aWNlICAgPSAnQTMvVTEgUENJIHRv IEFHUCBCcmlkZ2UnCiAgICBjbGFzcyAgICA9IGJyaWRnZQogICAgc3ViY2xh c3MgPSBQQ0ktUENJCm9oY2kwQHBjaTA6MjowOgljbGFzcz0weDBjMDMxMCBj YXJkPTB4MDAyNDEwM2MgY2hpcD0weDUyMzcxMGI5IHJldj0weDAzIGhkcj0w eDAwCiAgICB2ZW5kb3IgICA9ICdBY2VyIExhYnMgSW5jb3Jwb3JhdGVkIChB TGkpJwogICAgZGV2aWNlICAgPSAnTTUyMzcgT3BlbkhDSSAxLjEgVVNCIENv bnRyb2xsZXInCiAgICBjbGFzcyAgICA9IHNlcmlhbCBidXMKICAgIHN1YmNs YXNzID0gVVNCCnBjbTBAcGNpMDo2OjA6CWNsYXNzPTB4MDQwMTAwIGNhcmQ9 MHgwMDI0MTAzYyBjaGlwPTB4NTQ1MTEwYjkgcmV2PTB4MDIgaGRyPTB4MDAK ICAgIHZlbmRvciAgID0gJ0FjZXIgTGFicyBJbmNvcnBvcmF0ZWQgKEFMaSkn CiAgICBkZXZpY2UgICA9ICdBTEkgTTU0NTEgUENJIEFDLUxpbmsgQ29udHJv bGxlciBBdWRpbyBEZXZpY2UnCiAgICBjbGFzcyAgICA9IG11bHRpbWVkaWEK ICAgIHN1YmNsYXNzID0gYXVkaW8KaXNhYjBAcGNpMDo3OjA6CWNsYXNzPTB4 MDYwMTAwIGNhcmQ9MHgxNTMzMTBiOSBjaGlwPTB4MTUzMzEwYjkgcmV2PTB4 MDAgaGRyPTB4MDAKICAgIHZlbmRvciAgID0gJ0FjZXIgTGFicyBJbmNvcnBv cmF0ZWQgKEFMaSknCiAgICBkZXZpY2UgICA9ICdBTEkgTTE1MzMgQWxhZGRp biBJViBJU0EgQnJpZGdlJwogICAgY2xhc3MgICAgPSBicmlkZ2UKICAgIHN1 YmNsYXNzID0gUENJLUlTQQpub25lMEBwY2kwOjg6MDoJY2xhc3M9MHgwNzAz MDAgY2FyZD0weDAwMjQxMDNjIGNoaXA9MHg1NDU3MTBiOSByZXY9MHgwMCBo ZHI9MHgwMAogICAgdmVuZG9yICAgPSAnQWNlciBMYWJzIEluY29ycG9yYXRl ZCAoQUxpKScKICAgIGRldmljZSAgID0gJ0FMSSBONTQ1NyAgQUM5NyBNb2Rl bSBjb250cm9sbGVyJwogICAgY2xhc3MgICAgPSBzaW1wbGUgY29tbXMKY2Ji MEBwY2kwOjEwOjA6CWNsYXNzPTB4MDYwNzAwIGNhcmQ9MHgwMDI0MTAzYyBj aGlwPTB4YWM1MDEwNGMgcmV2PTB4MDIgaGRyPTB4MDIKICAgIHZlbmRvciAg ID0gJ1RleGFzIEluc3RydW1lbnRzIChUSSknCiAgICBkZXZpY2UgICA9ICdQ Q0kxNDEwIFBDIGNhcmQgY2FyZEJ1cyBDb250cm9sbGVyJwogICAgY2xhc3Mg ICAgPSBicmlkZ2UKICAgIHN1YmNsYXNzID0gUENJLUNhcmRCdXMKYXRhcGNp MEBwY2kwOjE2OjA6CWNsYXNzPTB4MDEwMWIwIGNhcmQ9MHgwMDI0MTAzYyBj aGlwPTB4NTIyOTEwYjkgcmV2PTB4YzQgaGRyPTB4MDAKICAgIHZlbmRvciAg ID0gJ0FjZXIgTGFicyBJbmNvcnBvcmF0ZWQgKEFMaSknCiAgICBkZXZpY2Ug ICA9ICdNMTU0MyBTb3V0aGJyaWRnZSBFSURFIENvbnRyb2xsZXInCiAgICBj bGFzcyAgICA9IG1hc3Mgc3RvcmFnZQogICAgc3ViY2xhc3MgPSBBVEEKbm9u ZTFAcGNpMDoxNzowOgljbGFzcz0weDA2ODAwMCBjYXJkPTB4MDAyNDEwM2Mg Y2hpcD0weDcxMDExMGI5IHJldj0weDAwIGhkcj0weDAwCiAgICB2ZW5kb3Ig ICA9ICdBY2VyIExhYnMgSW5jb3Jwb3JhdGVkIChBTGkpJwogICAgZGV2aWNl ICAgPSAnQUxJIE03MTAxIFBvd2VyIE1hbmFnZW1lbnQgQ29udHJvbGxlcicK ICAgIGNsYXNzICAgID0gYnJpZGdlCiAgICBzdWJjbGFzcyA9IFBDSS11bmtu b3duCnNpczBAcGNpMDoxODowOgljbGFzcz0weDAyMDAwMCBjYXJkPTB4MDAy NDEwM2MgY2hpcD0weDAwMjAxMDBiIHJldj0weDAwIGhkcj0weDAwCiAgICB2 ZW5kb3IgICA9ICdOYXRpb25hbCBTZW1pY29uZHVjdG9yJwogICAgZGV2aWNl ICAgPSAnRFA4MzgxNS8xNiBGYXN0IEV0aGVybmV0IEFkYXB0ZXIgKE1hY1Bo eXRlci9NYWNQaHl0ZXItSUkpJwogICAgY2xhc3MgICAgPSBuZXR3b3JrCiAg ICBzdWJjbGFzcyA9IGV0aGVybmV0Cm5vbmUyQHBjaTE6NTowOgljbGFzcz0w eDAzMDAwMCBjYXJkPTB4MDAyNDEwM2MgY2hpcD0weDQzMzYxMDAyIHJldj0w eDAwIGhkcj0weDAwCiAgICB2ZW5kb3IgICA9ICdBVEkgVGVjaG5vbG9naWVz IEluYy4nCiAgICBkZXZpY2UgICA9ICdSYWRlb24gTW9iaWxpdHkgVTEnCiAg ICBjbGFzcyAgICA9IGRpc3BsYXkKICAgIHN1YmNsYXNzID0gVkdBCg== --0-407690730-1104764525=:60108-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 15:05:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91B816A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:05:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F27A43D39 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:05:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 27180 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 07:05:33 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 07:05:33 -0800 Message-ID: <41D95F2C.3090407@taborandtashell.net> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:05:16 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Horsfall References: <41D8EF18.5010504@taborandtashell.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 and some icons broke in Window Maker 0.91.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:05:37 -0000 Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Tabor Kelly wrote: > >>Of note: I have an Intel i810 video chipset and Xorg 6.8.1 "broke" the >>driver for it, but I set NoAccel in my xorg.conf file and that was >>supposed to take care of it (now X at least starts). Does anyone think >>this could be related to my specific hardware? > > Could be; grab the latest Xorg from CVS, as a fix to the 810 driver > (6.8.1_1) was committed yesterday. Apparently the bug is in libtiff 3.7.1, but I will upgrade xorg because it is very slow with NoAccel. Thanks everyone. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 15:28:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C67416A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:28:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6240743D31 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:28:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micologist@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so405724rnz for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:28:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NqW+SZYPLhjGo+0j7rkguX+eGWe4q7L/eoMB0tLvJd3QC3Ic/Vu9aViTwK0ZeCwlN76D614f6Qy16u4mTqEcsfczFb+8agVwDoQ4owNry/ndSm7DDZvaBwU/AXQWgjKhAqM3gmFzjQySO4TLBQ+ByhKDn2gDKfncRr/aWHXxCzE= Received: by 10.38.26.40 with SMTP id 40mr56436rnz; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:28:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.8.51 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 07:28:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7227803f05010307285db55df4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:28:19 -0500 From: David Vincelli To: Marc Fonvieille , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7227803f04122408577867a7a8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1178_8197267.1104766099203" References: <7227803f041223222861547e39@mail.gmail.com> <20041224160008.GB592@nosferatu.blackend.org> <7227803f0412240809b40b5ed@mail.gmail.com> <20041224164257.GC592@nosferatu.blackend.org> <7227803f04122408577867a7a8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Pioneer DVR-108 can burn DVDs, can't mount them! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Vincelli List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:28:22 -0000 ------=_Part_1178_8197267.1104766099203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline This post is a follow-up to the problem I discovered a few weeks ago: I can burn DVDs but I can't mount DVDs (originals or the ones I burnt). The burnt DVDs work on other OSes (with the same and different drives). My DVD burner is a DVR-108. See the attached dmesg for details. Here is what gets pumped into /var/log/messages when I try to mount the DVD (I also get "mount: /dev/cd0 Input/output error" at the prompt) using /dev/cd0 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retries Exhausted Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x5 back Using /dev/acd0, put the follwing in /var/log/messages: Jan 3 10:23:50 files kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG HARDWARE ERROR asc=0x08 ascq=0x03 error=0 It also produces the same "mount: /dev/acd0 Input/output error" message on the tty. I've also attached my dmesg, because I believe it could be related to some unsupported chipset. I will try with hw.ata.atapi_dma="0" and report here. Thanks, On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:57:14 -0500, David Vincelli wrote: > That's exactly what I mean (I can't mount any DVDs at all). I tried > with both devices, they both fail. mount: Input/Output error. I'll try > with dma disabled on atapi devices (I assume hw.ata.atpai_dma="0" > means disable dma for atapi devices) when I have access to the box - > it's at work and the office is closed. > > I think some chipset on my motherboard is left uncofigured though. > I'll post the dmesg when I get back to work (jan 3rd). I'll also post > that lovely error message. > > Thanks for your help. > > On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:42:57 +0100, Marc Fonvieille > wrote: > > You mean you cannot mount any DVDs? > > You use something like: > > > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /cdrom > > or > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /cdrom > > > > ? > > > > Could you try with hw.ata.atapi_dma="0" in /boot/loader.conf > > > > Marc > > > > > -- > David Vincelli > -- David Vincelli ------=_Part_1178_8197267.1104766099203 Content-Type: text/plain; name="dmesg.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.txt" Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 =09The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Dec 21 19:36:53 EST 2004 mico@files.void.ptr:/tmp/KERNEL MPTable: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Sempron(tm) 2600+ (1825.96-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D 0x681 Stepping =3D 1 Features=3D0x383fbff AMD Features=3D0xc0480000 real memory =3D 520028160 (495 MB) avail memory =3D 499216384 (476 MB) ioapic0: Assuming intbase of 0 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff at device = 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) uhci0: port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 21 at device 16.0= on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 21 at device 16.1= on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 21 at device 16.2= on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 16.3 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 17.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xdc00-0xdc0f,0x376,0x170-0x177= ,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 17.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 vr0: port 0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xde001000-0= xde0010ff irq 23 at device 18.0 on pci0 miibus0: on vr0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto vr0: Ethernet address: 00:11:2f:7c:38:7a cpu0 on motherboard pmtimer0 on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x64,0x60 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1825955818 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec ad0: 190782MB [387621/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA66 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device=20 cd0: 66.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0=20 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0=20 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0=20 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0=20 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0=20 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error (ultra-dma/32) (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Retries Exhausted (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): cddone: got error 0x5 back Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...done Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop... Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...3 0 3 0 0 done No buffers busy after final sync Uptime: 35m25s Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `hpt_wt' to stop...Copyright (c= ) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 =09The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Dec 21 19:36:53 EST 2004 mico@files.void.ptr:/tmp/KERNEL Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Sempron(tm) 2600+ (1825.96-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "AuthenticAMD" Id =3D 0x681 Stepping =3D 1 Features=3D0x383fbff AMD Features=3D0xc0480000 real memory =3D 520028160 (495 MB) avail memory =3D 499212288 (476 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_button1: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff at device = 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) uhci0: port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 21 at device 16.0= on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 21 at device 16.1= on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 21 at device 16.2= on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 16.3 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 17.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xdc00-0xdc0f,0x376,0x170-0x177= ,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 17.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 vr0: port 0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xde001000-0= xde0010ff irq 23 at device 18.0 on pci0 miibus0: on vr0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto vr0: Ethernet address: 00:11:2f:7c:38:7a sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acp= i0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x778-0x77b,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 3 = on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/9 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pmtimer0 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1825955450 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec ad0: 190782MB [387621/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA66 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device=20 cd0: 66.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ------=_Part_1178_8197267.1104766099203-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 15:41:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984CD16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:41:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.qbrick.com (mail.qbrick.com [62.13.40.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C4E43D1F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felipe@garcia-lind.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.qbrick.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E1851972; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:41:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.qbrick.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.qbrick.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 82697-01-2; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:41:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.43.0.10] (unknown [62.13.40.61]) by mail.qbrick.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B76451987; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:41:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41D9676F.7060707@garcia-lind.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:40:31 +0100 From: Felipe Garcia User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at qbrick.com Subject: problems with fsck and 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:41:21 -0000 fsck fails, is there any way to save this fs.. force it to be marked ok or is there a fix for fsck (tired with the lastest version out of cvs does the same) ** /dev/amrd1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /usr/local/media ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=6526350 (180224 should be 113760) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=6526354 (83552 should be 65984) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=6526356 (81504 should be 65984) CORRECT? no fsck_ffs: cannot alloc 3400404768 bytes for inoinfo more info su-2.05b# disklabel /dev/amrd1 # /dev/amrd1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 3721183232 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit e: 3721183216 16 4.2BSD 2048 16384 48696 /felipe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 15:45:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC2916A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:45:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lp1001.snu.ac.kr (lp1001.snu.ac.kr [147.46.70.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEA943D45 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by lp1001.snu.ac.kr (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j03FgtmW028036 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 00:42:56 +0900 Message-ID: <41D96888.1060500@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:45:12 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <41D952C2.1040708@yahoo.com> <200501030736.55330.james@idea-anvil.net> In-Reply-To: <200501030736.55330.james@idea-anvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Samba on a router; doesn't work for outer network. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:45:14 -0000 James Jhai wrote: > On Monday 03 January 2005 07:12 am, Rob wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I have tried to configure Samba on a FreeBSD (5.3) router & NAT. >> >>I want to have a single accessible directory with a password, >>that can be accessed from the inner network (10.0.0.X) as well >>as from the outer network (outer network = Windows PCs that use >>the same external router as the FreeBSD PC). >> >>It works for the inner network, but not for the outer network >>(see below for network scheme). All Windows PCs are XP. >> >>For testing this, I use an 'open' firewall. I should tighten the >>firewall as soon as this is working. >> >>The /usr/local/etc/smb.conf (configured with swat) is as follows: >> >>#------------ smb.conf ---------------------------------- >>[global] >> workgroup = CISR >> netbios name = SURFACE >> server string = FreeBSD Samba Server >> passdb backend = tdbsam >> log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m >> max log size = 50 >> dns proxy = No >> ldap ssl = no >> >>[share] >> comment = Shared stuff >> path = /home/share >> invalid users = @wheel >> valid users = share >> read only = No >> force create mode = 0700 >> force security mode = 0700 >>#--------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > I belive you'll have to add the "interfaces" option and define all the interfaces that you > want samba to use. You can use IP's or the interface names (rl0, wi0, ndis0, ed0, etc...). > In addition to setting firewall rules up, samba also has a deny/allow section, again the swat help > on the option will give you more details. Thanks. I have added following lines in the [global] section of smb.conf: interfaces = fxp0, rl0, lo0 bind interfaces only = Yes hosts allow = 123.45.67.89/28, 10.0.0.0/24, 127.0.0.1 hosts deny = ALL Is that what you are talking about? rl0 interface is connected to the 10.0.0.0/24 inner-network and fxp0 is connected to the outer-network with gateway 123.45.67.1. (I use real IP addresses instead of 123.45.67.89, of course). Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 16:11:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AB716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:11:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A639443D39 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:11:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nocmonkey@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so66924rne for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:11:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=gpUBDj2oi/TsNvSyzgthpgVQQvVwgzKcTB4OOegzw5HTbuCSGeBQt2BxnTkdHXlYQgsOoyAkbNdsxenprNIjuQr9TnWNB9FHdNwis8TyiGagLOmVRt3+xTRs4xZEeQtj3d+l+EBqMb8lDTjM8uMY1gCRQiUp+IWnyhTfoc6ZwsQ= Received: by 10.38.13.9 with SMTP id 9mr262608rnm; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:11:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.22.52 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:11:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:11:18 -0500 From: Danny To: Sitkei Attila In-Reply-To: <41D93287.8070105@pmihiv.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041230175745.A151A16A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <41D455CF.2040802@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <41D93287.8070105@pmihiv.hu> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD server(s) to backup multi-platform systems remotely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Danny List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:11:22 -0000 On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:54:47 +0100, Sitkei Attila wrote: > > >>> From a backup point of view, my goal... > >> > >> > >> On a nightly and automated basis - to take a snapshot of all new and > >> modified data from a FreeBSD server and Windows server. Then compress > >> and hopefully encrypt the data and send it to a remote FreeBSD server > >> through some form of efficient and secure file transfer. Uncompressed > >> the nightly data may total ~20MB. > > > > It is worth to take a look at http://www.fluffy.co.uk/boxbackup/, which is > a tool focusing on automated (`lazy') or snapshot backup. Supported are most > unices, there is no FreeBSD-port however. A windows' client utility is work > in progress, though usable via cygwin now. Its main advantages: > * backups via encrypted streams, public key infrastucture > * only modified parts are to be transported > * preserving the overwritten or deleted files > * quota-support > * userland RAID-option I had never heard of boxbackup before, so thank you for the link! This tool appears to be the closest to what I am looking for. Hopefully the development continues. Cheers, ...D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 16:23:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52DF16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:23:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B0543D58 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:23:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micologist@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so408146rnz for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:23:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=QxM3lauWFtxSJfru0e6hTP0hW3/y/7WT1/klD3SxaJsW1bPUsvwFZH97pQQ9FE93YEXWKHGb0FIAG98HsB5T5ue2LmgBP6byNoxIbnaP+n9lTKvpnbCAQmlO/cossvQA0rvnrcrHX9/Az10sdkELDtP4zfR5bgo+63nlfh3BrVM= Received: by 10.38.19.34 with SMTP id 34mr503385rns; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.8.51 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:23:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7227803f050103082325486a02@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:23:11 -0500 From: David Vincelli To: Marc Fonvieille , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7227803f04122408577867a7a8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7227803f041223222861547e39@mail.gmail.com> <20041224160008.GB592@nosferatu.blackend.org> <7227803f0412240809b40b5ed@mail.gmail.com> <20041224164257.GC592@nosferatu.blackend.org> <7227803f04122408577867a7a8@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Pioneer DVR-108 can burn DVDs, can't mount them! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Vincelli List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:23:27 -0000 > On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:42:57 +0100, Marc Fonvieille > wrote: > > You mean you cannot mount any DVDs? > > You use something like: > > > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /cdrom > > or > > mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /cdrom > > > > ? > > > > Could you try with hw.ata.atapi_dma="0" in /boot/loader.conf Hi Mark, I can mount DVDs with hw.ata.atapi_dma="0". I don't think I like the implications of this. DMA transfers are a good thing. I suppose DVD access is PIO/Interrupt Driven transfers? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 16:50:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3141516A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:50:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C293F43D31 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from j65nko@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so93057wra for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:50:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=fX4UJbijll2UW5D7cucqGtrx9caB/P/e+VgaWvBkdEiYDk6izLT6zoY1NxLMxOB219b/gZhx4dhAnqoOnxwYy/ZsLqnVm5NXnMJEIuArs1iFUuvObTbVX5ULu9Nbwbi4VMes52c5O3WGoiXbVle1yi6azM8cqOeZuDb5BvpV+/U= Received: by 10.54.40.41 with SMTP id n41mr545601wrn; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 08:50:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.37.19 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:50:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19861fba05010308504edb9229@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:50:21 +0100 From: J65nko BSD To: tethys ocean In-Reply-To: <235b800005010300233341def0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <235b800005010300233341def0@mail.gmail.com> cc: FreeBSD_Questions Subject: Re: defered mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: J65nko BSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 16:50:22 -0000 On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:23:07 +0200, tethys ocean wrote: > My problem is about defered mail. On our server sendmail is running > and sometimes some mail defered. I am researching how I can get > managed to send defer mail information to senders? I am taking a mail > from root but sender didnt take a mail that consist "your mail defered > bla bla bla....so I will take next tree minutes".. is it possible? if > it is possible how I can manage? > > in sendmail.cf > > O Timeout.queuereturn=2d > O Timeout.queuewarn=4h > O Timeout.queuewarn.normal=4h > > mailq > /var/spool/mqamavis (5 requests) > -----Q-ID----- --Size-- -----Q-Time----- > ------------Sender/Recipient----------- > iBVC8fpT049046- 6361 Fri Dec 31 14:12 > (host map: lookup (bbscomputer.net): deferred) > > iBVCIB9u051147- 6361 Fri Dec 31 14:21 > (host map: lookup (bbscomputer.net): deferred) > > iBVDjmck072838- 19579 Fri Dec 31 15:46 > (host map: lookup (gesan.com.tr): deferred) > > iBV68HLM055154- 30 Fri Dec 31 08:08 > (host map: lookup (active.net): deferred) > > iBVAnlhq030740- 354708 Fri Dec 31 12:49 > (host map: lookup (jungletree.org): deferred) > > Total requests: 5 > As far as I can see, there is not much what you can do about it ;) $ host bbscomputer.net ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached $ host gesan.com.tr Host gesan.com.tr not found: 2(SERVFAIL) $ host active.net active.net has address 12.161.44.180 $ host -t mx active.net active.net mail is handled by 10 mail.active.net. $ host mail.active.net Host mail.active.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) $ host jungletree.org Host jungletree.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) =Adriaan= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 17:13:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D9616A4CE; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:13:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from S3.cableone.net (smtp3.cableone.net [24.116.0.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0869243D1F; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:13:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.123.89]) by S3.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S3) with ESMTP id 6131944 for multiple; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:28:24 -0700 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:12:51 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: David Vincelli Message-ID: <20050103111251.06fbc3ca@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <7227803f05010307285db55df4@mail.gmail.com> References: <7227803f041223222861547e39@mail.gmail.com> <20041224160008.GB592@nosferatu.blackend.org> <7227803f0412240809b40b5ed@mail.gmail.com> <20041224164257.GC592@nosferatu.blackend.org> <7227803f04122408577867a7a8@mail.gmail.com> <7227803f05010307285db55df4@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 33, in=55, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.123.89 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net cc: Marc Fonvieille cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pioneer DVR-108 can burn DVDs, can't mount them! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 17:13:52 -0000 On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:28:19 -0500 David Vincelli wrote: > This post is a follow-up to the problem I discovered a few weeks > ago: I can burn DVDs but I can't mount DVDs (originals or the ones I > burnt). The burnt DVDs work on other OSes (with the same and > different drives). My DVD burner is a DVR-108. See the attached > dmesg for details. > > Here is what gets pumped into /var/log/messages when I try to mount > the DVD (I also get "mount: /dev/cd0 Input/output error" at the > prompt) using /dev/cd0 > > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 > 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI > Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI > Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files > kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error > (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): > Retrying Command (per Sense Data) > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 > 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI > Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI > Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files > kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error > (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): > Retrying Command (per Sense Data) > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 > 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI > Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI > Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files > kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error > (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): > Retrying Command (per Sense Data) > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 > 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI > Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI > Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files > kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error > (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): > Retrying Command (per Sense Data) > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 > 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 0 > Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI > Status Error Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): SCSI > Status: Check Condition Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: > (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): HARDWARE FAILURE asc:8,3 Jan 3 09:39:54 files > kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): Logical unit communication crc error > (ultra-dma/32) Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): > Retries Exhausted Jan 3 09:39:54 files kernel: (cd0:ata1:0:0:0): > cddone: got error 0x5 back > > Using /dev/acd0, put the follwing in /var/log/messages: > > Jan 3 10:23:50 files kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG HARDWARE > ERROR asc=0x08 ascq=0x03 error=0 > > It also produces the same "mount: /dev/acd0 Input/output error" > message on the tty. two things to possibly take into consideration http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-November/063721.html http://forums.devshed.com/t210043/s.html IIRC you mentioned some where something about a interupt storm in regards to this... if so I would possibly suspect atapicam. I have a Promise PDC20268 UDMA100 controller card that runs into massive problems with atapicam if a CD/DVD drive is attached to it. > I've also attached my dmesg, because I believe it could be related > to some unsupported chipset. That is most likely the usb 2.0 controller... so nothing to worry about... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 17:24:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D770716A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:24:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ew.co.za (g2.endorphinweb.co.za [196.41.15.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3717A43D58 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:24:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@mnet-online.de) X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/Sophos http://raeinternet.com/mpp X-Scanned-By: RAE MPP/ClamAV http://raeinternet.com/mpp Received: from [62.245.243.32] (unverified [62.245.243.32]) by ew.co.za (SurgeMail 2.2d) with ESMTP id 33128 for multiple; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 19:23:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20041230175745.A151A16A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <41D455CF.2040802@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <41D93287.8070105@pmihiv.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <2EEB56F1-5DAC-11D9-A856-000A95D5F764@mnet-online.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stephan Lichtenauer Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:23:28 +0100 To: Danny X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com X-Authenticated-User: s01@lichtenauer.co.za cc: Sitkei Attila cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD server(s) to backup multi-platform systems remotely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 17:24:52 -0000 Am 03.01.2005 um 17:11 schrieb Danny: > On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 12:54:47 +0100, Sitkei Attila > wrote: > > I had never heard of boxbackup before, so thank you for the link! This > tool appears to be the closest to what I am looking for. Hopefully the > development continues. > I just looked at it, too, and it reminds me a bit of DIBS (http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~emin/source_code/dibs/index.html), a distributed backup system that can send your data to several computers across the network. While I have no experience with it myself, what is on the website looks quite interesting and you might want to check that out, too. Stephan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 17:52:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E655D16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:52:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7227C43D49 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:52:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (c-66-41-157-209.mn.client2.attbi.com [66.41.157.209]) (authenticated bits=0)j03HqT2R025177 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:52:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3A426BB0-5DB0-11D9-B56F-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-2--233989444" To: FreeBSD-Questions Questions From: Eric F Crist Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:52:25 -0600 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on grog.secure-computing.net Subject: SpamAssassin-Milter accuracy... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 17:52:39 -0000 --Apple-Mail-2--233989444 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Hello list, I recently had to rebuild my server (bad surge protector, all hardware died). I've reinstalled spamass-milter from ports, but I don't remember what I put in my old local.cf file for it to work so well before. I've pretty much got the base config file. Can some of you share your local.cf files with me, so I can figure out what I'm missing? I used to have maybe one or two emails get through a day, now I'm getting about 20-30 getting through spamassassin, of those, 15-20 are being caught by Apple's Mail.app. Thanks. _______________________________________________________ Eric F Crist "I am so smart, S.M.R.T!" Secure Computing Networks -Homer J Simpson --Apple-Mail-2--233989444 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkHZhlkACgkQRAAY9knOW+oe0gCfW4JV4SJdsJoR9gV62MfYAP7p 7tIAn0LkqF4tFVNoRZKwnpK0gteSpH8L =a0fB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-2--233989444-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 17:56:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F3116A56D for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:56:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms1.usu.edu (ms1.usu.edu [129.123.104.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860D843D45 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:56:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hal@cc.usu.edu) Received: from [129.123.104.140] (buffy.ncs.usu.edu [129.123.104.140]) by ms1.usu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j03Hulqp019642 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:56:47 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: hal Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:56:47 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-USU-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-USU-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: hal@cc.usu.edu Subject: FreeBSD vs. SCSI tape drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 17:56:52 -0000 I have a backup server: OS freeBSD 4.7 P25 SuperMicro X5DP8-G2 mother board Symbios 875 SCSI controller with 1 Exabyte VXA-1 tape drive on channel 0 Adaptec 3960D SCSI controller with 2 Seagate ST39173LW disk drives on Channel 0 with 1 Dell Ultrium 2 tape drive on channel 1 2 3ware raid controllers with 2 mirror sets each The problem: About 50% of the time dump crashes writing to the Ultrium tape drive. See the output of dmesg and /var/log/messages below. A look at the tape drive's onboard error log shows nothing. The tape drive diagnostics show no problems. Can anyone offer a solution/insight/sympathy? If you need more info please ask. hal ############ output of dmseg ############################################### Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p25 #1: Fri Dec 10 13:55:55 MST 2004 root@jack.ss.usu.edu:/usr/src/sys/compile/JACK Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium 4 (2799.22-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff,ACC,> real memory = 2146959360 (2096640K bytes) config> q avail memory = 2088710144 (2039756K bytes) Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #1 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #2 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #3 Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #4 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 6, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 cpu2 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 cpu3 (AP): apic id: 7, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00178020, at 0xfec00000 io1 (APIC): apic id: 3, version: 0x00178020, at 0xfec80000 io2 (APIC): apic id: 4, version: 0x00178020, at 0xfec80400 io3 (APIC): apic id: 5, version: 0x00178020, at 0xfec81000 io4 (APIC): apic id: 8, version: 0x00178020, at 0xfec81400 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc02f8000. Preloaded userconfig_script "/boot/kernel.conf" at 0xc02f809c. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Using $PIR table, 29 entries at 0xc00fddf0 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard IOAPIC #0 intpin 16 -> irq 2 IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 10 IOAPIC #0 intpin 18 -> irq 11 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2541) at 0.1 pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1461) at 28.0 pcib2: at device 29.0 on pci1 IOAPIC #2 intpin 0 -> irq 16 IOAPIC #2 intpin 1 -> irq 17 pci2: on pcib2 ahc0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xfb200000-0xfb200fff irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci2 aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs ahc1: port 0x3400-0x34ff mem 0xfb201000-0xfb201fff irq 17 at device 1.1 on pci2 aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs pci1: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1461) at 30.0 pcib3: at device 31.0 on pci1 IOAPIC #1 intpin 0 -> irq 18 IOAPIC #1 intpin 1 -> irq 19 IOAPIC #1 intpin 4 -> irq 20 IOAPIC #1 intpin 5 -> irq 21 pci3: on pcib3 sym0: <875> port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xfb340000-0xfb340fff,0xfb342000-0xfb3420ff irq 18 at device 1.0 on pci3 sym0: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking sym0: open drain IRQ line driver, using on-chip SRAM sym0: using LOAD/STORE-based firmware. sym1: <875> port 0x4400-0x44ff mem 0xfb341000-0xfb341fff,0xfb342400-0xfb3424ff irq 19 at device 1.1 on pci3 sym1: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking sym1: open drain IRQ line driver, using on-chip SRAM sym1: using LOAD/STORE-based firmware. em0: port 0x4800-0x483f mem 0xfb300000-0xfb31ffff irq 20 at device 2.0 on pci3 em0: Speed:100 Mbps Duplex:Full em1: port 0x4840-0x487f mem 0xfb320000-0xfb33ffff irq 21 at device 2.1 on pci3 em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pcib4: at device 3.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pci4: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1461) at 28.0 pcib5: at device 29.0 on pci4 IOAPIC #4 intpin 4 -> irq 22 pci5: on pcib5 twe0: <3ware Storage Controller> port 0x5000-0x500f mem 0xfb800000-0xfbffffff,0xfb500000-0xfb50000f irq 22 at device 2.0 on pci5 twe0: 8 ports, Firmware FE7X 1.05.00.065, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.048 pci4: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1461) at 30.0 pcib6: at device 31.0 on pci4 IOAPIC #3 intpin 0 -> irq 23 pci6: on pcib6 twe1: <3ware Storage Controller> port 0x6000-0x600f mem 0xfc000000-0xfc7fffff,0xfc800000-0xfc80000f irq 23 at device 1.0 on pci6 twe1: 4 ports, Firmware FE7X 1.05.00.023, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.036 pci0: at 29.0 irq 2 pci0: at 29.1 irq 10 pci0: at 29.2 irq 11 pcib7: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci7: on pcib7 pci7: at 1.0 irq 2 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x2060-0x206f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 0 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x2483) at 31.3 irq 0 orm0: su-2.05b# su-2.05b# pkg_info | grep gimp gimp-2.2.0,1 A GNU Image Manipulation Program gimp-print-4.2.7_1 GIMP Print Printer Driver su-2.05b# su-2.05b# pkg_info | grep cups cups-1.1.22.0 The Common UNIX Printing System: Metaport to install comple cups-base-1.1.22.0_1 The Common UNIX Printing System: headers, libs, & daemons cups-lpr-1.1.22.0 The CUPS BSD and system V compatibility binaries (lp* comma cups-pstoraster-7.07_3 GNU Postscript interpreter for CUPS printing to non-PS prin libgnomecups-0.1.14,1 Support library for gnome cups admistration su-2.05b# su-2.05b# pkg_info | grep pips pips-spr300_310-2.6.2 Photo Image Print System for Linux --- EPSON Stylus Photo R su-2.05b# Any ideas? Thanks a lot, Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:21:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEE716A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:21:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 670FF43D31 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:21:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so33333wra for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:21:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=SNmWjkSGqHWeafWiYFx6QfGLEMyuakyQGAbvwcnd0Bng5OQGoMJ42aGnD2E0ntFz2VVkU9KWiZLOjxBZQxQ96XbhogWKo2GEtZ4Um5PAflNd8iWvPpdHjR4FVSyK2K+qO2izKmgoHPu6ubiF75h/VacdF4w3aQ91iYt6KHFeuyc= Received: by 10.54.56.68 with SMTP id e68mr106153wra; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:21:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:21:17 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: "cpghost@cordula.ws" In-Reply-To: <20050104200424.GB33185@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050103204341.GB26032@xor.obsecurity.org> <86wtutitns.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <41DACF99.50601@taborandtashell.net> <20050104200424.GB33185@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:21:18 -0000 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:04:24 +0100, cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote: > > Dave Horsfall wrote: > > >On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > > > > > > > >>direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html > > > > > > > > >And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody hoops > > >do we have to jump through? > > > > I did it, and it wasn't hard, just confusing. It is confusing because > > you need to know that: > > > > 1. You need the linprocfs mounted to make java/linux-sun-jdk14 > > 2. You need to install java/jdk14 before you try to build OpenOffice > > (even though this is not listed as a dependency). > > > > Note: this is from my memory, which is not always 100% what it should be. > > Installing native jdk14 isn't that hard, as long as you follow the > instructions to the letter. > > I've tried to compile openoffice from scratch using the port (it worked > before), but this time it bombed near the end with a program 'lzip' > dumping core because it was fed a wrong package list (?). I tried to > track the problem down, but it was too deeply hidden within the OO > build process, so I finally gave up and fetched the binary package which > works perfectly. This was 2 weeks ago; perhaps OO compiles perfectly now? It does; at least, it did on Sunday afternoon ;) -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:22:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BD816A4D1 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:22:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at (chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.137.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46AF543D46 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:22:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: (qmail 15252 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 20:22:21 -0000 Received: from matrix010.matrix.net (192.168.123.10) by ns.matrix.net with SMTP; 4 Jan 2005 20:22:21 -0000 From: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:22:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20050103204341.GB26032@xor.obsecurity.org> <41DACF99.50601@taborandtashell.net> <20050104200424.GB33185@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <20050104200424.GB33185@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501042122.21570.4711@chello.at> cc: cpghost@cordula.ws Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:22:26 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 04 January 2005 21:04, cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote: > > I've tried to compile openoffice from scratch using the port (it worked > before), but this time it bombed near the end with a program 'lzip' > dumping core because it was fed a wrong package list (?). I tried to > track the problem down, but it was too deeply hidden within the OO > build process, so I finally gave up and fetched the binary package which > works perfectly. This was 2 weeks ago; perhaps OO compiles perfectly now? No on 5.3-STABLE it doesn't. See http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ there is a note from 2004/Dec/22 and there is also an open PR about this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/75785 Cheers, ch - -- Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x3BCA53BE OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2vr909WjGjvKU74RAoVUAJ9ImwhvycswcAYDosDCXCbZJUS79wCeKf4j RAytWInFjsyXQjjjivwRnLQ= =KQ9H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:27:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63EE16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:27:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net (mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAA143D48 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:27:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 29302 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 20:27:02 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jan 2005 20:27:02 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6656169; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:27:01 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: scott renna References: <20050103022902.38409.qmail@web53608.mail.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Jan 2005 15:27:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20050103022902.38409.qmail@web53608.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44wtutszxm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 55 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NDISAPI in the kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:27:03 -0000 scott renna writes: > I saw another user post about issues compiling in ndis > support into the kernel for FreeBSD 5.3. I'm also > having an issue. I've gotten both if_ndis and ndis > kernel modules to load and I have connectivity to the > box, but I'd like to have ndis be permanent. You could just have the loader automatically load the module for you at boot time... > I've added the following to my kernel: > > options NDISAPI > device ndis > device wlan (this was already present in the > default) > > Here's the issue I run into: > > make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | > MKDEP_CPP="cc -E" CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O > -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual > -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. > -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/pf > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include > opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param > inline-unit-growth=100 --param > large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding > /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis.c:85:30: > ndis_driver_data.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis_pci.c:65:30: > ndis_driver_data.h: No such file or directory > mkdep: compile failed > *** Error code 1 > > the file, ndis_driver_data.h is present in: > > /usr/src/sys/compat/ndis/ndis_driver_data.h > /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/ndis_driver_data.h > /usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis/ndis_driver_data.h > > Where else might i put a copy of this file so the > kernel can build itself? Any of the directories listed as "-I" options in the output quoted above should serve. I don't have that file in my tree at all. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:32:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6571816A4ED for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:32:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF29843D1D for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:32:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so221538wra for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:32:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=roCuk1xxUJ+tXqEbJ05/RS22AjT1wkqJ7sBWI2I+ukntuzLFCeySkvgftrTB/rLMKamBI2+gFCB36O+LN7fjo3yvQI1nbkZsU8KfI8I0f5rjs8s3lay73Kf1LDpxvDbmcn0pZNdL+3dzGQ+Yw5ZdymqsNh5GT70ToQyZKZoqH6M= Received: by 10.54.36.27 with SMTP id j27mr396205wrj; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 11:37:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.33.61 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:37:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2b5f066d05010411374e15a206@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:37:19 -0500 From: Brian McCann To: Aaron Nichols In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <2b5f066d05010405413cf48f99@mail.gmail.com> <41DAA4C9.6010909@landgren.net> <2b5f066d0501040716173effb9@mail.gmail.com> <2b5f066d05010407165bba4ae0@mail.gmail.com> cc: FreeBSD mailinglist Subject: Re: SSH & 5.3 Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brian McCann List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:32:41 -0000 Tried that ....I set PuTTY to use only V2 and it died as well. I guess it's possible that older versions of PuTTY has an SSH v2 bug, but it happened from FreeBSD trying that too. :-/ Thanks though, --Brian On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:17:34 -0800, Aaron Nichols wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:16:37 -0500, Brian McCann wrote: > > That's just it...I didn't see any errors. Originally it was throwing > > errors that it couldn't lookup the name of the workstation, but once > > that got fixed I wasn't getting anything. I've got to try putting > > sshd into verbose later this afternoon... > > Note that as of 5.x only protocol version 2 is supported by default. > Thus, you may want to try changing the following line in > /etc/ssh/sshd_config: > > from: > #Protocol 2 > > to: > Protocol 2,1 > > This will enable ssh1 support > > Aaron > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:37:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D86916A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:37:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38FF43D1D for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:37:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DADC49E1C for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:37:42 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: W8EbPH08zeM6clQh57nr2w 1104871062 Received: from gumby.localhost (dsl-80-41-102-250.access.uk.tiscali.com [80.41.102.250]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FDD287A2 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:37:42 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:37:39 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501042037.40332.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: make install clean question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:37:44 -0000 On Tuesday 04 January 2005 19:53, Olof Andersson wrote: > Hi! > I tried to run the make install clean again to be able to not select > the "mysqli" but I only get the same message again. I tried to find > information on how to "reset" the install but did not succeed. I have > FreeBSD 5.3. Once set, configuration is remembered until new options appear. you need: make config see man ports From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:43:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB4C16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:43:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45C743D49 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:44:32 -0600 Message-ID: <41DAFFE9.8090904@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:43:21 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olof Andersson References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2005 20:44:36.0802 (UTC) FILETIME=[34377220:01C4F29E] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make install clean question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:43:55 -0000 Olof Andersson wrote: >Hi! > >I'm a newbie with a problem. > > > Hi! Welcome to FreeBSD. I'm not sure this is a FBSD issue, but you've done a good job asking the question. Here's my .02 euros ... >I tried to install phpmyadmin from the >ports. When I ran the make install clean for the first time I got a >screen where I could make a couple of choices. I chose to install with >something called "mysqli". The make install process stopped and I got >this message: > >anderssons1# make install clean > >You may use the following additional build option: > > WITH_SUPHP=yes Install appropriately for use with > the www/suphp port [default: no] > >Unknown extension mysqli. >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin. > >I tried to run the make install clean again to be able to not select >the "mysqli" but I only get the same message again. I tried to find >information on how to "reset" the install but did not succeed. I have >FreeBSD 5.3. > > Mysqli is for "mysql-lite", and is only available on PHP5 and MySQL 4.1 or greater. Probably you need to take a look at your versions of those programs. HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:45:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C94E16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:45:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5168E43D39 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:45:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15004 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 20:45:31 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jan 2005 20:45:30 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 374A669; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:45:30 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Felipe Garcia References: <41D9676F.7060707@garcia-lind.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Jan 2005 15:45:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <41D9676F.7060707@garcia-lind.com> Message-ID: <44sm5gudn9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with fsck and 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:45:31 -0000 Felipe Garcia writes: > fsck fails, is there any way to save this fs.. force it to be marked > ok or is there a fix for fsck (tired with the lastest version out of > cvs does the same) > > > ** /dev/amrd1e (NO WRITE) > ** Last Mounted on /usr/local/media > ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes > INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=6526350 (180224 should be 113760) > CORRECT? no > > INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=6526354 (83552 should be 65984) > CORRECT? no > > INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=6526356 (81504 should be 65984) > CORRECT? no > > fsck_ffs: cannot alloc 3400404768 bytes for inoinfo That's a huge amount of memory, all right. A quick look at the code makes me think that it might be a word-size error; are you running on a 64-bit platform by any chance? This is probably worth a PR, and definitely worth a message to the filesystem experts. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:54:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCD216A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:54:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9AF43D31 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:54:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B6D6151354; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:54:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:54:50 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tabor Kelly Message-ID: <20050104205450.GB13991@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050103204341.GB26032@xor.obsecurity.org> <86wtutitns.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <41DACF99.50601@taborandtashell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DACF99.50601@taborandtashell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Dave Horsfall Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:54:30 -0000 --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:17:13AM -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote: > Dave Horsfall wrote: > >On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > > > > >>direction of http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.4/index.html > > > > > >And if you follow the ports route instead, just how many more bloody hoo= ps > >do we have to jump through? >=20 > I did it, and it wasn't hard, just confusing. It is confusing because=20 > you need to know that: >=20 > 1. You need the linprocfs mounted to make java/linux-sun-jdk14 > 2. You need to install java/jdk14 before you try to build OpenOffice=20 > (even though this is not listed as a dependency). It is, actually. You only need linprocfs in order to build jdk14, because bootstrapping a java compiler requires a java compiler (i.e. we use a linux binary jdk). If you already had jdk14 installed before you tried to build OO, you wouldn't need to compile another jdk. Kris --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2wKaWry0BWjoQKURAu9GAJ0VGh4JcciAb0LXI+FMhJxhN2TAmwCfW87P vfZwaOsm81uel8mGT/5+4D0= =rzd/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:55:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C4816A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:55:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05C243D4C for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:55:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:56:34 -0600 Message-ID: <41DB0296.8010308@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:54:46 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Noah References: <20050104195041.M59926@enabled.com> In-Reply-To: <20050104195041.M59926@enabled.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2005 20:56:39.0364 (UTC) FILETIME=[E2E5A840:01C4F29F] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make restart receives strange output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:55:58 -0000 Noah wrote: >sendmail-8.12.3 >FreeBSD-4.9 > > >can somebody please explain to me why "Restarting:--: not found" is displayed >when I restart sendmail? this started recently. > > >--- snip --- > ># cd /etc/mail ># make restart >Restarting:--: not found > sendmail sendmail-clientmqueue. ># > >--- snip --- > >and from /etc/mail/Makefile > >--- snip --- > ># ># $FreeBSD: src/etc/mail/Makefile,v 1.9.2.26 2004/06/06 17:29:48 gshapiro Exp $ ># ># This Makefile provides an easy way to generate the configuration ># file and database maps for the sendmail(8) daemon. ># > > >---- snip --- > > > >cheers, > >Noah > > I'm inclined to think that in editing either an .mc/.cf file or the Makefile, someone has left an errant character or other symbol. Or, it could be in the .rc script itself. But it's impossible (for me, anyway) to know without more information (like looking into those files, for example). Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:56:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F7A16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:56:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4644443D2D for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:56:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0CDEE53437; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:56:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:56:43 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andrew Sinclair Message-ID: <20050104205643.GC13991@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41DA0AB8.3080400@centtech.com> <41DABE72.2000501@optusnet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DABE72.2000501@optusnet.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Eric Anderson cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade system destruction? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:56:23 -0000 --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:04:02PM +0000, Andrew Sinclair wrote: > Portupgrade makes a mess at the best of times. A recursive portupgrade=20 > is not so clever about dependencies, particually on a live system. On=20 > occasion, it even seems to tamper with core libraries which is what=20 > would have occured in your case. Can you provide some evidence of these claims? I'm suspicious :-) Kris --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2wMLWry0BWjoQKURAo3oAJ9fLJlUGLa2+Dwly3iqsb3n3r++cQCfc0U9 gsLUXIxPO9P++hQv8av4sWI= =B68+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:59:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A0C16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:59:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7833E43D54 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:59:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4368F533FA; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:59:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:59:22 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bruce Campbell Message-ID: <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:59:01 -0000 --llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:38:48PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote: >=20 > We upgraded from a dual 1.66GHz AMD running FreeBSD 4.7 > and a dual 3GHz Xeon running FreeBSD 5.3 and the new server > is painfully slow, even after turning spamassassin=20 > and yavr (yet another virus recipe) off. Load > appears to be imapd/ipop3d (uw-imapd) related. Same version as you were running before? Same configuration files? Can you show us your kernel configuration and dmesg? Kris --llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2wOpWry0BWjoQKURAvU/AJ9S9owtznDAuUThJ30dS1Ghmh7IgwCgrkjL 0j1wd4wSHaFBznK1bvVg9Cs= =8b4g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --llIrKcgUOe3dCx0c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 20:59:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD2C16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:59:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web30910.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30910.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1676A43D2D for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:59:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcd_advisory@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20050104205921.36875.qmail@web30910.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.28.117.41] by web30910.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:59:21 PST Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:59:21 -0800 (PST) From: Mervin McDougall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Sound problems in vesa X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:59:22 -0000 I have noticed that since I have enabled vesa on my laptop there has been difficulty with my sound.. in that whenever I am switching from one screen resolution to another I get this grumbling sound over my speakers when music is being played. I thought this was limited to me switching from X to a vesa console but the same problem occurs when at the console when switching from one console at 1024x768 to 80x30. I have been fighting to figure out the problem for ages with freebsd 5.3. I am not sure whether anyone else has experienced the same problem and what can be done to improve the situation. I am running freebsd on my compaq presario 2100 laptop. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:02:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AD916A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:02:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7801C43D2D for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:02:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from [209.53.238.86] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Clvoh-000GA6-QE; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:02:11 -0800 Message-ID: <41DB0452.2070005@ccstores.com> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:02:10 -0800 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (86) Subject: phpMyAdmin on 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:02:10 -0000 phpMyAdmin is "marked as broken" on my 5.3 release. has it since been fixed? (I've never tried cvsup, but will if it will help me with phpMyAdmin). Thanks! Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:06:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0D616A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:06:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B3943D1D for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:06:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 21115 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 21:06:17 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jan 2005 21:06:17 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6BA3E69; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:06:16 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Jordan Michaels References: <41D9C7BC.2050309@bouncebk.com> <41D9CE4C.4080306@viviotech.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Jan 2005 16:06:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <41D9CE4C.4080306@viviotech.net> Message-ID: <44oeg4ucon.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 and finding dependant packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:06:17 -0000 Jordan Michaels writes: > However, now when I go to install php, I get an error message (Error > code 1) and when I try to remove the check box next to the apache > package, I get a "This package is required by 2 other packages" error > message. > > So, my questions is simple: What do I need to do to figure out what > packages require apache to be installed? I've worked with SuSE's YAST > tool and RPM's (and tools that manage RPM's... like YAST), but what's > the BSD way to go about this? pkg_info(1). For that matter, if you delete packages with pkg_delete(1), it will tell you which other packages (if any) are keeping a package from being installed. For more flexible options in updating your packages, you might want to look at the sysutils/portupgrade port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:20:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8542B16A4EB for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:20:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8E743D2D for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:20:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:22287 helo=openbsd.piweb.intern) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Clw6L-0001SU-Mc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:20:25 +0000 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:20:25 +0100 From: Nico Meijer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050104222025.092cfe63.nico.meijer@zonnet.nl> In-Reply-To: <41DB0452.2070005@ccstores.com> References: <41DB0452.2070005@ccstores.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-unknown-openbsd3.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: phpMyAdmin on 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:20:27 -0000 Hi Jim, > phpMyAdmin is "marked as broken" on my 5.3 release. > > has it since been fixed? (I've never tried cvsup, but > will if it will help me with phpMyAdmin). I have no idea. You can install phpMyAdmin by hand in 10 seconds. Download whatever format you like and untar/unzip in a directory of your choice. Modify config.inc.php to your liking and off you go. HTH... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:25:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C4E16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:25:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECE143D46 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:25:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A78338959E; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:25:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:25:36 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: Noah , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050104190642.M26516@enabled.com> References: <20050104190642.M26516@enabled.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: syslog.conf help directing ctl_cyrusdb output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:25:37 -0000 --On Tuesday, January 04, 2005 11:08:43 AM -0800 Noah wrote: > FreeBSD-4.9 > > well this is a bit of a newbie question. > > how can I move the ctl_cyrusdb entries to a specific log file. I dont > want them to appear in /var/log/messages any longer. > > Please send me a good web link that shows me how to do this. > Look at /usr/local/share/doc/cyrus-imapd/install-configure.html In /etc/syslog.conf add the following line: local6.debug /var/log/imapd.log (or something similar) Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:26:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD9A16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:26:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.speakeasy.net (mail3.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E5443D1F for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 12263 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 21:26:06 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jan 2005 21:26:06 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A893A6B; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:26:05 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Kevin Smith References: <41DA2B73.9080809@adelphia.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Jan 2005 16:26:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <41DA2B73.9080809@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <44k6qsubrm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mounting firewire/USB storate devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:26:07 -0000 Kevin Smith writes: > (1) Is there an easier way to manage these devices. For example, if > there is a way to auto mount them when they are plugged in that would > be nice. Gnome 2.8 is supposed to support this, but I have not found > any clear way on how to set it up. See the comments on "wiring" devices in "man SCSI". > (2) More general but related question...Currently with the setup I > have above, if I want to use the command "mount /ipod", I have to be > superuser. What permissions do I need to set so that a normal user can > do the mount ? -or- what group would the user have to be in. By > default users on my system are in operator and wheel groups. The FreeBSD FAQ has an entry on this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:29:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9382F16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:29:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F6243D2F for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:29:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so44489wra for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:29:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Aq2nYREKLNK9NEDoPOruaLxinOmJGrD8nN7mGzOrkaUb7zSLRk9mvOyouSCwKy6cwbEbq4J7vbk4xzmKSLCA4WSAuKFw7k3Jdpw2si7gJNoLPaQZfH10L9k/EqqOeVsNdkhch0RUiSKPk2nHC1XArKoLMwBhWJsBCojJf+4YRkE= Received: by 10.54.42.56 with SMTP id p56mr141150wrp; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:29:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:29:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:29:12 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Olof Andersson In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make install clean question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:29:13 -0000 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:53:06 +0100, Olof Andersson wrote: > Hi! > > I'm a newbie with a problem. I tried to install phpmyadmin from the > ports. When I ran the make install clean for the first time I got a > screen where I could make a couple of choices. I chose to install with > something called "mysqli". The make install process stopped and I got > this message: > > anderssons1# make install clean > > You may use the following additional build option: > > WITH_SUPHP=yes Install appropriately for use with > the www/suphp port [default: no] > > Unknown extension mysqli. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin. > > I tried to run the make install clean again to be able to not select > the "mysqli" but I only get the same message again. I tried to find > information on how to "reset" the install but did not succeed. I have > FreeBSD 5.3. > > Can someone help me? Thanks in advance. Both of these should do that: # make rmconfig or, # rm /var/db/ports//options -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:31:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB1116A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:31:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.speakeasy.net (mail2.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960AD43D46 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:31:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 9011 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 21:31:54 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jan 2005 21:31:53 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id CBBD769; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:31:52 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: =?Windows-1251?Q?=CD=E0=E7=E8=EC_=C0=EB=E8=E5=E2?= References: <1295379561.20050104190016@mail.ru> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Jan 2005 16:31:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1295379561.20050104190016@mail.ru> Message-ID: <44ekh0ubhz.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need A Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:31:54 -0000 =?Windows-1251?Q?=CD=E0=E7=E8=EC_=C0=EB=E8=E5=E2?= writes: > I can't find driver for Broadcom NetXtrem NIC. NIC comes with Dell power edge 1750.How can I solve this problem?Becouse when I installed FreeBSD 5.0 on this server it doesn't recognize this NIC. On FreeBSD 5.3, the bge(4) driver recognizes this device. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:41:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBF916A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:41:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06E043D54 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:41:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amccarthy@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so307244cwc for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:41:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ug/+LpqH0FEgzqjdI7zUZs221Kc4X3/Qvx+RkxO8hKPXUcs9N6UZbeHcY/bWfSCtHt6lVurgQwdd7Kbf7mYmOyB8sSLOzSX9hUN4C3g1tKn2YLsi4mHQhMgB9PusCNLzmM83eKMrO8YszveldHQR8HM8/YMt6s9Wt0yEKZEsFvo= Received: by 10.11.116.78 with SMTP id o78mr188413cwc; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 13:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.11.94.33 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:41:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:41:25 -0500 From: Adam To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Privoxy at boot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Adam List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:41:26 -0000 I installed Privoxy and it seems to run nicely but I have installed it many times before (not because it didn't install, but because the machine was insane.) but anyway, I for some reason have never been able to find out how to make it start up at boot. I tried /etc/rc.conf but no luck. I tried Google and still no luck. -- Love Joy, Peace, Patience, Kindness, Goodness, Faithfullnes, Gentleness, Self-Control. ^^ You need all of these. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:45:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271DA16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:45:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.50.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6118B43D4C for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (localhost.uwaterloo.ca [127.0.0.1]) j04LjHAG024239; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:45:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: (from www@localhost) by ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j04LjGOc024238; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:45:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca: www set sender to bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca using -f Received: from 129.97.50.50 ( [129.97.50.50])HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:45:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:45:16 -0500 From: Bruce Campbell To: Kris Kennaway References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 / FreeBSD-4.6.2 X-Originating-IP: 129.97.50.50 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:45:15 -0000 Quoting Kris Kennaway : > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:38:48PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote: > > > > We upgraded from a dual 1.66GHz AMD running FreeBSD 4.7 > > and a dual 3GHz Xeon running FreeBSD 5.3 and the new server > > is painfully slow, even after turning spamassassin > > and yavr (yet another virus recipe) off. Load > > appears to be imapd/ipop3d (uw-imapd) related. > > Same version as you were running before? Same configuration files? Well, no, not quite. old: imap-uw-2002_1,1 new: imap-uw-2004a,1 Just about all packages have undergone some updates on our new server. The only processes for which we have hundreds running would be sendmail, procmail, ipop3d and imapd. But, when I had the sendmail conf'ed to shutdown mail when load av went over 12, load av would still shoot up to 40 or 50 and stay there, and only major processes were imapd, ipop3d. And I noticed them calling setitimer alot, and 80% system usage. I'm about to pull the zero channel adaptec scsi raid card, for no other reason than I'm out of bright ideas. > > Can you show us your kernel configuration and dmesg? > > Kris old: (difference from 4.7 GENERIC) - cpu I386_CPU - cpu I486_CPU + options QUOTA #enable disk quotas + options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel + options APIC_IO # Symmetric (APIC) I/O new: (difference from 5.3 GENERIC) Reverted to non SMP for now, only difference from GENERIC is... options QUOTA I did have options SMP going for a while. Removing SMP has made no difference in load or responsiveness. Actually seems slightly better on one CPU. dmesg.boot from new system is as follows: Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 25 15:48:15 EST 2004 root@bookworm.uwaterloo.ca:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MAIL_SERVER Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3065.80-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7 Features=0xbfebfbff Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 2146959360 (2047 MB) avail memory = 2095419392 (1998 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 48-71 on motherboard npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) pcib1: at device 2.0 on pci0 pcib1: could not get PCI interrupt routing table for \\_SB_.PCI0.HLB_ - AE_NOT_FOU ND pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 28.0 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 29.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib2 em0: port 0x3000-0x303f m em 0xf8200000-0xf821ffff irq 54 at device 3.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:29:c5:a8 em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A em1: port 0x3040-0x307f m em 0xf8220000-0xf823ffff irq 55 at device 3.1 on pci2 em1: Ethernet address: 00:30:48:29:c5:a9 em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pci1: at device 30.0 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 31.0 on pci1 pci3: on pcib3 asr0: mem 0xfc000000-0xfdffffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff, 0xf8300000-0xf83fffff irq 30 at device 3.0 on pci3 asr0: [GIANT-LOCKED] asr0: ADAPTEC 2015S FW Rev. 3B05, 2 channel, 256 CCBs, Protocol I2O uhci0: port 0x2000-0x201f irq 16 a t device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x2020-0x203f irq 19 a t device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x2040-0x205f irq 18 a t device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pci4: at device 1.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x2060-0x206f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f 6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) acpi_button0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 orm0: at iomem 0xe0000-0xe3fff,0xc9000-0xcefff,0xc8000-0xc8fff,0 xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 3065804384 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 ses0 at asr0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 ses0: Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device ses0: SAF-TE Compliant Device da0 at asr0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 70007MB (143374336 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8924C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to den y, logging disabled em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex -- Bruce Campbell Engineering Computing CPH-2374B University of Waterloo (519)888-4567 ext 5889 ---------------------------------------- This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 21:58:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7E716A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:58:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spatula.dreamhost.com (spatula.dreamhost.com [66.33.205.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3250043D1D for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:58:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-68-250-179-63.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [68.250.179.63]) by spatula.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE4117D01C; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 13:58:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:58:24 -0500 To: Bruce Campbell X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:58:29 -0000 On Jan 4, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Bruce Campbell wrote: > The only processes for which we have hundreds running would be > sendmail, procmail, ipop3d and imapd. I love procmail and would hate to live w/o it, but that would be my first suspect out of that list. TjL who once got a phone call from his ISP because of his .procmailrc (oops!) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 22:01:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F9C16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:01:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.speakeasy.net (mail3.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB9C43D3F for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:01:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 3446 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 22:01:45 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 4 Jan 2005 22:01:45 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2304569; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:01:45 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Anthony Atkielski To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1761142680.20050104050725@wanadoo.fr> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 04 Jan 2005 17:01:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1761142680.20050104050725@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: <44acroua47.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Running top on system console without being logged on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 22:01:46 -0000 Anthony Atkielski writes: > I'd like to run top on the system console to keep an eye on the system, > but I'd prefer not to have the console logged on to do so. Is there an > elegant way to do this? /etc/ttys is the usual way. I can't seem to get it working quickly, though. > Also, is there a way to send input to stdin of the top process even > after I've started and detached it (in order to redraw the screen or to > give top a command, etc.)? That would be harder. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 22:15:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF98616A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:15:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4BD43D3F for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8A9DD51354; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:15:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:15:31 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bruce Campbell Message-ID: <20050104221531.GA70844@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 22:15:10 -0000 --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote: > Quoting Kris Kennaway : >=20 > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:38:48PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote: > > >=20 > > > We upgraded from a dual 1.66GHz AMD running FreeBSD 4.7 > > > and a dual 3GHz Xeon running FreeBSD 5.3 and the new server > > > is painfully slow, even after turning spamassassin=20 > > > and yavr (yet another virus recipe) off. Load > > > appears to be imapd/ipop3d (uw-imapd) related. > >=20 > > Same version as you were running before? Same configuration files? >=20 > Well, no, not quite. >=20 > old: imap-uw-2002_1,1 > new: imap-uw-2004a,1 OK, that's where you should start, then. Go back to the software configuration that you know is working and see if it still misbehaves. Kris --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2xWDWry0BWjoQKURAuhuAKDtnpFcBKThD/Z3I1Hl2zYoDlQAZQCgtKmU LjQI5k2wIwmFdsi3IuO5REE= =2Ret -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 22:29:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE89F16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:29:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C33343D39 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:29:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so236178wra for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:29:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gHBiykKtZDlqVowMMqn/nwfpiJ9aO6Pk0PGduC1SFB3u3hvH1soNe96lR/54pwUo14Vc1PYsK3aE3HnFLJcmIC/ax/Qiw+XeIfXx+yj6LcRTAdIOaCpeo5Shmr2HE3e26sRCVv9BE/aR05jnDaDIe/Cv3ItHUl8u0AhYa97hReU= Received: by 10.54.52.62 with SMTP id z62mr54410wrz; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:29:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.33.61 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:29:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2b5f066d0501041429705f2b50@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:29:09 -0500 From: Brian McCann To: FreeBSD mailinglist Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NIS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brian McCann List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 22:29:11 -0000 HI all...I'm having a NIS problem I can't figure out. I've done this before on 4.7, and countless other times on RedHat...but this is evading me. I'm trying to re-make my databases since I've added a user, I go into /var/yp and run "make mynis" and get "`mynis' is up to date.", which I know can't be right. I've got to be missing something somewhere. I've added the line to the Makefile "MASTER_PASSWD = /etc/master.passwd" so that YP uses the file in /etc...or at least...that's all I recall having to do on 4.7, and doctored up the sections that involve the passwd files changed it to only look at UIDs greater then 3. Can someone point out my probably obvious mistake? Thanks, --Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 22:37:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B7116A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:37:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from amcuxfw803.amc.af.mil (amcuxfw803.amc.af.mil [131.9.254.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D7C43D1F for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:37:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.hauan@fairchild.af.mil) Received: from amcw2av803.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.19.116]) by fw3.amc.af.mil with SMTP id j04MbOBX011505; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:37:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from AMCW2BH505.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.25.136]) M2005010416373732298 ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:37:37 -0600 Received: from amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.19.74]) by AMCW2BH505.amc.ds.af.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:37:37 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:37:37 -0600 Message-ID: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC6013BAB21@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: sco utility Thread-Index: AcTylD04LQuLBJsDQmOvSq4yf7gODgAGZz3A From: "Hauan David A" To: "Leon" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2005 22:37:37.0602 (UTC) FILETIME=[FDE36A20:01C4F2AD] Subject: RE: sco utility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 22:37:40 -0000 > Hi, > I have installed KDE 3.3 on free bsd. > But the KDE doesn't have a SCO utility. > Where can I download this utility from? > Thanks, > Leon. Are you thinking of ibcs2? SCO emulation? dave=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 22:46:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EB516A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:46:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7BB43D46 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from map7@optusnet.com.au) Received: from [192.168.0.178] (c211-28-148-194.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au [211.28.148.194]) (authenticated bits=0)j04MkMxI006747 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:46:22 +1100 Message-ID: <41DB1C74.2000809@optusnet.com.au> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:45:08 +1100 From: Michael User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: canon lbp-1210 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 22:46:24 -0000 I'm trying to get my canon lbp-1210 to work under freebsd, it doesn't have any emulation and seems to be a windows only printer. Is there anyway to use windows drivers under freebsd for the printer? (EG: like the ndiswrapper is used to make windows network drivers work under freebsd) When I plug in the printer to my freebsd4.10 machine into the USB slot it comes up as a 'ugen' which says to me that the computer doesn't know what the device is at all. I've tried installing CUPs and looking for a suitable driver through CUPs but couldn't find one. I'm now trying to find alternatives. The printer has USB and parallel and prints fine under windows. What about if I put a windows box as my printer server and is it possible to send printing through samba so that windows will catch it and convert it to the crappy printer of mine? (EG: RAW --> Canon LBP-1210 windows drivers). ~Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 23:19:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDC316A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:19:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (fia148-72.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.72.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EAF43D48 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:19:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl) Received: from localhost (colin@localhost) by kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j04NIo108268; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:18:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:18:49 +0100 From: "Colin J. Raven" To: Timothy Luoma In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions cc: Bruce Campbell Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:19:49 -0000 On Jan 4 at 16:58, Timothy Luoma launched this into the bitstream: > > On Jan 4, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Bruce Campbell wrote: > >> The only processes for which we have hundreds running would be sendmail, >> procmail, ipop3d and imapd. > > I love procmail and would hate to live w/o it, but that would be my first > suspect out of that list. > > TjL > who once got a phone call from his ISP because of his .procmailrc (oops!) > You too eh? :-) -Colin (who just *knows* it was _that_ "special" recipe on the procmail list that did us both in on the same day!!) Sorta like a digital Montezuma's revenge [shudder] sorry, couldn't resist. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 23:23:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1920516A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:23:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A212343D54 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:23:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cjalmond@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so106864rne for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:23:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dyR/SLXwYbS4E8n/DyzG3Lq1hNPtVNA/wf9+7icOSCpeG6MLQwshoYk0/+KWJ1HmWiu314JTiBxA6dSKOpxkJ80n/VzwTReHsXeRPby/pvWimyb00cw6CqGeCaUcnOq3fcoOyHM43xrGsShqbDnCmBZQfhmKEWd14YkqCEFwl7Y= Received: by 10.38.96.45 with SMTP id t45mr428351rnb; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:23:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.97.21 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:23:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92b67e1b050104152322d7beac@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:23:05 -0600 From: Curtis Almond To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: install.cfg disklabel customization question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Curtis Almond List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:23:07 -0000 I would like to be able to do the following 1. Create a / partition of x size 2. Create a swap partition of x size 3. Create a /usr partition of x size 4. Create a ufs partition of the rest of the disk but it is not mounted at boot. What I have thus far is: # label disk 1 # IDE ad0s2-1=ufs 3969000 / ad0s2-2=swap 3969000 none ad0s2-3=ufs 3969000 /usr ad0s2-4=ufs 0 /usr100 Anyone know how to make /usr100 not mounted at boot time? Or even better.... How can I create the ad0s2-4 (ad0s2f after boot) label but have sysinstall not newfs it during netboot? Any ideas would be great.. Curtis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 23:24:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EFC16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:24:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web61305.mail.yahoo.com (web61305.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6695F43D39 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:24:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hardcodeharry@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 47307 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Jan 2005 23:24:31 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=nt65S8im+Vf/nV71B8IbvL+gQPbOrtKIAeCUTQrjCDTZb4VBESnXpIIi23Qmq+Jy6vvzc0QRF/BKVNRJtbOGFGHC1QVmj2GDr4OsxX0LZurbUDa8ATGbIMFGHjx5i7l+YXtJaw+zb0fEmj1FTjW7n/gRDOoCGx+Lbqyfiw9M8Pw= ; Message-ID: <20050104232430.47305.qmail@web61305.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.12.116.74] by web61305.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:24:30 PST Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 15:24:30 -0800 (PST) From: Boris Spirialitious To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:24:33 -0000 None of the new Supermicro hardware I've tried works with Freebsd 4.10 properly. I've seen that this has been reported by others. They are all based on the 7520 and 7530 Intel chips. 5.3 works ok, but a 3.4/800 processor on 5.3 is slower than a 3.06/533 processor on our old 7502 chipset based system with 4.9. What can be done? Will OpenBSD have the same problem? I really want to use FreeBSD. Boris --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 4 23:43:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACEF16A4CE for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:43:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A99E43D48 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:43:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bvanzant@asyncfs.com) Received: from unknown (HELO 10.1.3.117) (10.1.3.117) by smtp.ironport.com with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2005 15:43:41 -0800 From: Bob Van Zant To: Brian McCann In-Reply-To: <2b5f066d0501041429705f2b50@mail.gmail.com> References: <2b5f066d0501041429705f2b50@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:43:40 -0800 Message-Id: <1104882220.29610.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD mailinglist Subject: Re: NIS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:43:43 -0000 Are your dates screwed up? By that I mean is master.passwd newer than your NIS file? Try touch(1)ing your NIS file and then running make. I've never actually setup NIS before. My comment is just based on my experiences with make. -Bob On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 17:29 -0500, Brian McCann wrote: > HI all...I'm having a NIS problem I can't figure out. I've done this > before on 4.7, and countless other times on RedHat...but this is > evading me. I'm trying to re-make my databases since I've added a > user, I go into /var/yp and run "make mynis" and get "`mynis' is up to > date.", which I know can't be right. I've got to be missing something > somewhere. > I've added the line to the Makefile "MASTER_PASSWD = > /etc/master.passwd" so that YP uses the file in /etc...or at > least...that's all I recall having to do on 4.7, and doctored up the > sections that involve the passwd files changed it to only look at UIDs > greater then 3. > Can someone point out my probably obvious mistake? > > Thanks, > --Brian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > =================================================================== > This footer was appended by the Honeypot Injector > The message was injected from 216.136.204.119 > on 04 Jan 2005 14:29:24 -0800. This IP > was classified in the WHITELIST sender group. > The org ID is 1681939, and the SBRS is 2.1 > =================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 00:09:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2C216A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:09:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.emmplus.ie (mail.emmplus.ie [66.154.97.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC5043D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:09:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jev@ecad.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.emmplus.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39028A33DA for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:11:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.emmplus.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cohiba.emmplus.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30415-04 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:11:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (S0106000f3d4a81ef.vn.shawcable.net [24.86.11.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.emmplus.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id C953EA1140 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:11:07 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <41DB303B.3030608@ecad.org> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:09:31 -0800 From: Jev User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at emmplus.ie Subject: migrating from mysql 4.0 to 4.1 best practice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:09:33 -0000 Hi All, What is the best practice to upgrade from Mysql 4.0.X to 4.1.X, using the ports system naturally? I have searched, but not come up with any definitive solutions. Is the solution to backup, un-install, then install the other? Please cc, as I'm not subscribed to questions. Thanks, -Jev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 00:15:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4CA16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:15:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chosa.michosa.com (cip-68-37.bbs.surfcity.net [66.116.68.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36CE43D55 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:15:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from federico@michosa.com) Received: from lico (lico [192.168.0.2]) by chosa.michosa.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j050JOWL048792 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:19:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from federico@michosa.com) Message-Id: <200501050019.j050JOWL048792@chosa.michosa.com> From: "federico" To: Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:19:04 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.224 Thread-Index: AcTyvCnF+4i2Uww4SGaXOrRumJCSOQ== Subject: Sudden reboots with ProLiant DL360 G3 and 5.3-RELEASE-p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: federico@michosa.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:15:58 -0000 Hello, we have a ProLiant DL360 Generation 3 Server with 5.3-RELEASE-p2 installed. The problem is that every now and then the server suddenly reboots. I had the problem from the first install. At the beginning the server would suddenly reboot during buildworld. Then, in the BIOS I the changed the Multi-Processor Specification Table Mode from Auto Set Table to Full Table Mapped, and Buildworld was able to finish successfully. I tried the other MPS settings, updating to the latest BIOS of the serve, loading FreeBSD with ACPI disabled, but the problem continues. Nothing is logged prior the every reboot, so I have no clue as to what might be causing the problem. We bought two identical servers at the same time. The other does not have any problems. HP help support is not very good and FreeBSD is not among their supported operating systems for this server, so could anybody please help? Please let me know what kind of information would be useful to troubleshot this problem, I will produce it. Thank you very much. federico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 00:28:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5683816A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:28:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263B343D46 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:28:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2CC9F51814; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:29:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:29:04 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: federico Message-ID: <20050105002904.GA12958@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200501050019.j050JOWL048792@chosa.michosa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501050019.j050JOWL048792@chosa.michosa.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sudden reboots with ProLiant DL360 G3 and 5.3-RELEASE-p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:28:42 -0000 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:19:04PM -0800, federico wrote: > Hello, we have a ProLiant DL360 Generation 3 Server with 5.3-RELEASE-p2 > installed. The problem is that every now and then the server suddenly > reboots. =20 Do you have crashdumps and/or DDB enabled? i.e. is it panicking, or really just rebooting without a panic? Kris --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB2zTPWry0BWjoQKURAqm8AKCzpk5Hn+AvzZs77113F5420A2blgCeMxs+ T0uthMAIgXhP7lL7E3dveYA= =H2j5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 00:36:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5B916A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:36:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from typhoon.enabled.com (typhoon.enabled.com [216.218.220.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C4F43D4C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:36:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Received: from enabled.com (localhost.enabled.com [127.0.0.1]) by typhoon.enabled.com (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j050aA2B029672; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:36:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) From: "Noah" To: Kevin Kinsey Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:36:10 -0800 Message-Id: <20050105003545.M42459@enabled.com> In-Reply-To: <41DB0296.8010308@daleco.biz> References: <20050104195041.M59926@enabled.com> <41DB0296.8010308@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 67.161.56.189 (admin2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make restart receives strange output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:36:26 -0000 > > > > > > I'm inclined to think that in editing either an .mc/.cf file > or the Makefile, someone has left an errant character > or other symbol. Or, it could be in the .rc script itself. > > But it's impossible (for me, anyway) to know without > more information (like looking into those files, for example). Please give me a List of the files I should be Looking through? cheers, Noah > > Kevin Kinsey > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 00:46:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C9416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:46:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chosa.michosa.com (cip-68-37.bbs.surfcity.net [66.116.68.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E26D43D5E for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:46:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from federico@michosa.com) Received: from lico (lico [192.168.0.2]) by chosa.michosa.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j050nvRQ049030; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:49:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from federico@michosa.com) Message-Id: <200501050049.j050nvRQ049030@chosa.michosa.com> From: "federico" To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:49:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050105002904.GA12958@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.224 Thread-Index: AcTyvf7AXDKiu00ESTCdN2eqLK4/5wAAZ0tQ cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sudden reboots with ProLiant DL360 G3 and 5.3-RELEASE-p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: federico@michosa.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:46:31 -0000 I don't think I have crash dumps or DDB enabled. I will make sure I enable them. I don't think is panicking, just suddently rebooting. There are no log entries or core dumps or freezes. federico -----Original Message----- From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@obsecurity.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 4:29 PM To: federico Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sudden reboots with ProLiant DL360 G3 and 5.3-RELEASE-p2 On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:19:04PM -0800, federico wrote: > Hello, we have a ProLiant DL360 Generation 3 Server with 5.3-RELEASE-p2 > installed. The problem is that every now and then the server suddenly > reboots. Do you have crashdumps and/or DDB enabled? i.e. is it panicking, or really just rebooting without a panic? Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 00:54:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2386316A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:54:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0139743D4C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:53:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005010500534301300cjnu8e>; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:53:43 +0000 Message-ID: <41DB3A66.9070103@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:52:54 -0500 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050102) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Loren M. Lang" References: <41D5D092.6030401@comcast.net> <20050103094111.GF14949@alzatex.com> In-Reply-To: <20050103094111.GF14949@alzatex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Passing options to a 'make install clean' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:54:04 -0000 Loren M. Lang wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 05:20:02PM -0500, rsh wrote: > >>I am trying to 'make install clean' of openoffice and do not want to >>install Java. >> >>I have tried several things to say no to Java but it always wants to try >>to install jdk14, and this port is not user friendly with my amd64 system. >> >>So how can I install openoffice without Java? > > > What about just installing a precompiled package of openoffice instead? > I don't think you need java or gcc to be installed for that. Try > pkg_add -r openoffice-1.1 or portinstall -PP editors/openoffice-1.1 if > you have portupgrade installed. Also, amd64 should be able to run all > i386 programs just as well as a real i386 machine can, maybe defined > CPUTYPE to i686 or something will allow you to build java, gcc, and > openoffice. > > There is also a freebsd package of openoffice available on their site I > believe. > > >> Thanks >> Sean >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I tried that, some dependency problems. Right now having some other problems and do not have to time to investigate currently. Will again when I have the chance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 01:08:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040B216A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:08:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from typhoon.enabled.com (typhoon.enabled.com [216.218.220.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE7043D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:08:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Received: from enabled.com (localhost.enabled.com [127.0.0.1]) by typhoon.enabled.com (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j05183tb031286; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:08:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) From: "Noah" To: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:08:03 -0800 Message-Id: <20050105010629.M47182@enabled.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20050104190642.M26516@enabled.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 67.161.56.189 (admin2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Re: syslog.conf help directing ctl_cyrusdb output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:08:05 -0000 On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:25:36 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote > --On Tuesday, January 04, 2005 11:08:43 AM -0800 Noah > wrote: > > > FreeBSD-4.9 > > > > well this is a bit of a newbie question. > > > > how can I move the ctl_cyrusdb entries to a specific log file. I dont > > want them to appear in /var/log/messages any longer. > > > > Please send me a good web link that shows me how to do this. > > > Look at /usr/local/share/doc/cyrus-imapd/install-configure.html > > In /etc/syslog.conf add the following line: > > local6.debug /var/log/imapd.log (or something similar) Hi there, You know I saw this recommendation in the installation configuration and added it to my syslog.conf file and then restarted syslogd. but the cyrus log messages still end up in /var/log/messages any clues on this? cheers, Noah > > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > The University of Texas at Dallas > AVIEN Founding Member > http://www.utdallas.edu > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 01:11:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CD816A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:11:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6058B43D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:11:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id j051AqD20169 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:10:55 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:10:51 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41DAD122.5060109@infracaninophile.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <200412311611.02070.reso3w83@verizon.net> <41D5EDB6.3030400@comcast.net> <41DAD122.5060109@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Passing options to a 'make install clean' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:11:07 -0000 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Matthew Seaman wrote: > The OpenOffice port really is a bit of a monster: non-gurus are strongly > advised to install OpenOffice via packages. Well, I wouldn't call myself a non-guru (I've been dealing with Unix since Edition 5 back in 1975) but this one definitely has me beaten... -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 01:13:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085A116A4CF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:13:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from typhoon.enabled.com (typhoon.enabled.com [216.218.220.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF93043D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:13:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) Received: from enabled.com (localhost.enabled.com [127.0.0.1]) by typhoon.enabled.com (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id j051DLEN031565; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:13:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin2@enabled.com) From: "Noah" To: Kevin Kinsey Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:13:21 -0800 Message-Id: <20050105011217.M16612@enabled.com> In-Reply-To: <41DB0296.8010308@daleco.biz> References: <20050104195041.M59926@enabled.com> <41DB0296.8010308@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 67.161.56.189 (admin2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make restart receives strange output (solved) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:13:26 -0000 On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 14:54:46 -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote > Noah wrote: > > >sendmail-8.12.3 > >FreeBSD-4.9 > > > > > >can somebody please explain to me why "Restarting:--: not found" is displayed > >when I restart sendmail? this started recently. > > > > > >--- snip --- > > > ># cd /etc/mail > ># make restart > >Restarting:--: not found > > sendmail sendmail-clientmqueue. > ># > > > >--- snip --- > > > >and from /etc/mail/Makefile > > > >--- snip --- > > > ># > ># $FreeBSD: src/etc/mail/Makefile,v 1.9.2.26 2004/06/06 17:29:48 gshapiro Exp $ > ># > ># This Makefile provides an easy way to generate the configuration > ># file and database maps for the sendmail(8) daemon. > ># > > > > > >---- snip --- > > > > > > > >cheers, > > > >Noah > > > > > > I'm inclined to think that in editing either an .mc/.cf file > or the Makefile, someone has left an errant character > or other symbol. Or, it could be in the .rc script itself. > > But it's impossible (for me, anyway) to know without > more information (like looking into those files, for example). okay I found the problem. the following line was in the rc.conf file. --- snip --- -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Wed Aug 7 07:02:37 2002 --- snip --- cheers, Noah > > Kevin Kinsey > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 01:32:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E21B16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:32:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4227643D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:32:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C4F451814; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:32:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:32:23 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: federico Message-ID: <20050105013223.GA29159@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050105002904.GA12958@xor.obsecurity.org> <200501050049.j050nvRQ049030@chosa.michosa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501050049.j050nvRQ049030@chosa.michosa.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: Sudden reboots with ProLiant DL360 G3 and 5.3-RELEASE-p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:32:02 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:49:37PM -0800, federico wrote: > I don't think I have crash dumps or DDB enabled. I will make sure I enab= le > them. I don't think is panicking, just suddently rebooting. > There are no > log entries or core dumps or freezes. =20 OK, but that's what you'd expect in the case I suggested ;-) Kris --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB20OnWry0BWjoQKURAgKbAKCxbSmCW/xPCL3Nw9J/dqSYBHqETgCfZjSU Lfq/0X+UjrSBybSzVQ7fR1k= =nXqY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 01:41:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCD216A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:41:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whisk.dreamhost.com (whisk.dreamhost.com [205.196.208.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6004543D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (user-33qt998.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.165.40]) by whisk.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FD3175114; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:41:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4469EBCA-5E84-11D9-A810-000A9592DF7A@lanoticia.com> References: <56BC8436-5E81-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <4469EBCA-5E84-11D9-A810-000A9592DF7A@lanoticia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Timothy Luoma Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:41:20 -0500 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q? "Alvaro_J._Gurdi=E1n" ?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:41:21 -0000 On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Alvaro J. Gurdi=E1n wrote: > This sounds very interesting. But I am not sure I understand very=20 > well what exactly is the task you were trying to accomplish. Are you=20= > controlling iTunes (and all it's music library) on your Mac from a=20 > FreeBSD box somewhere on the net, and playing it on the FreeBSD box? > > Because that sounds like something I might be interested in doing It's mostly about impressing women, but there are more practical=20 purposes as well :-) iTunes is on my Mac, playing music which is stored on my FreeBSD=20 machine. They are both on the same private subnet. The practical aspect of this is that I can remove my MP3 collection=20 from my Powerbook and just keep it on the FreeBSD server. If the FreeBSD machine were not behind a firewall, yes I could play my=20= iTunes collection anywhere on the internet (and I suppose with some=20 tweaking of my firewall, I still could) but that would be dealing with=20= much smaller bandwidth. If there were others on my subnet, yes, they too would be able to play=20= music from the same collection. TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 01:45:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BAD116A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:45:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chaos.fxp.org (chaos.fxp.org [209.251.159.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1321143D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:45:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@fxp.org) Received: from [10.2.0.150] (c-67-166-204-177.client.comcast.net [67.166.204.177]) by chaos.fxp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCFC3EB; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:45:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: <56BC8436-5E81-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <4469EBCA-5E84-11D9-A810-000A9592DF7A@lanoticia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <810B5932-5EBB-11D9-9284-000A95CEE8B4@fxp.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Bob Bomar Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:45:40 -0600 To: Timothy Luoma X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.1 (v33, 10.3) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:45:33 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 4, 2005, at 7:41 PM, Timothy Luoma wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Alvaro J. Gurdi=E1n wrote: > >> This sounds very interesting. But I am not sure I understand very=20 >> well what exactly is the task you were trying to accomplish. Are you=20= >> controlling iTunes (and all it's music library) on your Mac from a=20 >> FreeBSD box somewhere on the net, and playing it on the FreeBSD box? >> >> Because that sounds like something I might be interested in doing > > It's mostly about impressing women, but there are more practical=20 > purposes as well :-) > > iTunes is on my Mac, playing music which is stored on my FreeBSD=20 > machine. They are both on the same private subnet. > > The practical aspect of this is that I can remove my MP3 collection=20 > from my Powerbook and just keep it on the FreeBSD server. > > If the FreeBSD machine were not behind a firewall, yes I could play my=20= > iTunes collection anywhere on the internet (and I suppose with some=20 > tweaking of my firewall, I still could) but that would be dealing with=20= > much smaller bandwidth. > > If there were others on my subnet, yes, they too would be able to play=20= > music from the same collection. > I just setup a Samba server, and setup a directory that holds my music,=20= then use Hymn (playfair) to convert m4p to mp4, then lame and some other tools to convert to mp3, and share the music across the network. I tried=20 using Netatalk, but ran into some problems with file name lengths, and samba works just=20 fine. - -- Bob Bomar bob@bomar.us http://bob.bomar.us - --------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFB20bI9Jm/aTrtdKoRAn6jAKCFaLtAtcDV5CLF4Bwk8pDxGlwmQwCeOGoG gzEYGv2CBv6fvV65byTjadM=3D =3DV82/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 01:48:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26A316A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:48:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whisk.dreamhost.com (whisk.dreamhost.com [205.196.208.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B140043D54 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:48:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (user-33qt998.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.165.40]) by whisk.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4A7175112; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:48:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4469EBCA-5E84-11D9-A810-000A9592DF7A@lanoticia.com> References: <56BC8436-5E81-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <4469EBCA-5E84-11D9-A810-000A9592DF7A@lanoticia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Timothy Luoma Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:48:50 -0500 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q? "Alvaro_J._Gurdi=E1n" ?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 01:48:53 -0000 On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Alvaro J. Gurdi=E1n wrote: > Are you controlling iTunes (and all it's music library) on your Mac=20= > from a FreeBSD box somewhere on the net, and playing it on the FreeBSD=20= > box? Oh, there's one big caveat: there's apparently no way to tell iTunes to=20= look for a iTunes server, it does it automatically... and I presume=20 that it would NOT work over the internet, perhaps not even over a=20 different subnet. TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 02:27:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5155F16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:27:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.50.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F2C43D5C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (localhost.uwaterloo.ca [127.0.0.1]) j052RRAG042022; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:27:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: (from www@localhost) by ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j052RRxg042021; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:27:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca: www set sender to bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca using -f Received: from 65.93.198.45 ( [65.93.198.45])HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:27:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1104892047.41db508f4c7f4@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:27:27 -0500 From: Bruce Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104221531.GA70844@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050104221531.GA70844@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 / FreeBSD-4.6.2 X-Originating-IP: 65.93.198.45 Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow - traced to getpwnam maybe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 02:27:23 -0000 Quoting Kris Kennaway : >> > Well, no, not quite. > > > > old: imap-uw-2002_1,1 > > new: imap-uw-2004a,1 > > OK, that's where you should start, then. Go back to the software > configuration that you know is working and see if it still misbehaves. > > Kris Thanks. I shutdown imapd/ipop3d completely so I just had sendmail running, and still load av. was 20-30. Anyways, I have just found something very odd with both 5.2.1 and 5.3 on multiple different systems here, including a brand new GENERIC install. On 5.x, "ls -l" or "ps waux" is very slow with our /etc/master.passwd which has 11320 entries. I truss'ed those commands, and gave up after watching : lseek(4,0x17d000,SEEK_SET) = 1560576 (0x17d000) read(0x4,0x8074000,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) lseek(4,0x17e000,SEEK_SET) = 1564672 (0x17e000) read(0x4,0x8062000,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) lseek(4,0x17f000,SEEK_SET) = 1568768 (0x17f000) read(0x4,0x8066000,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) lseek(4,0x180000,SEEK_SET) = 1572864 (0x180000) scroll by for 10 minutes. (handle 4 = /etc/spwd.db) I wrote a small program: #include #include main( int argc, char *argv[] ) { getpwuid( 13076 ); } and ran it under truss on 5.x and it generated 178,711 lines of output. (the bulk of which is those lseek/read calls as above) 4.7 (with same master.passwd file) gave 59 lines of output, which seems normal. I'm speculating that imap and sendmail and just about everything use getpwuid and getpwuid is misbehaving on 5.x especially with a large master.passwd file. I will report this through the proper mechanism once I do just a bit more testing. And perhaps it is a known issue already and I'll look into that also. Or perhaps I have messed something up unwittingly, which I have been known to do. We do have an extremely busy 5.2.1 system running here fine on the same hardware, just it has a small /etc/master.passwd which may explain that systems success to date. Thank you to everyone who sent suggestions. -- Bruce Campbell Engineering Computing CPH-2374B University of Waterloo (519)888-4567 ext 5889 ---------------------------------------- This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 02:31:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A56816A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:31:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from work.in.com.au (ns1.in.com.au [203.29.209.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EA843D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:31:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deno@in.com.au) Received: (from root@localhost) by work.in.com.au (8.13.1/8.12.11) id j052VVPs072637 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:31:31 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from deno@in.com.au) Received: from dell (async193-instant07.in.com.au [203.202.111.193]) by work.in.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j052VCS1072313 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:31:16 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from deno@in.com.au) Message-ID: <000701c4f2cf$747d0940$1900a8c0@dell> From: "Denise Rougier" To: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:36:48 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on work.in.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL autolearn=no version=3.0.1 X-scanner: Scanned by Xamime-LT 0.1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Running dual CPUs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 02:31:13 -0000 hi, if you really want to know if the cpus are identicle (for intel) check = the s-spec, it is the S L _ _ _ text on the cpu. intel also organises = the chips via this too so you can search for it to see the specifics. = cpus of the same s-spec are the same voltage and stepping(version of = software inside the cpu). Charlie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 02:35:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D141416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:35:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail06.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4117943D55 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:35:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from syncman@optusnet.com.au) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (c211-30-63-111.belrs1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.63.111]) (authenticated bits=0)j052ZOZA019581 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:35:25 +1100 Message-ID: <41DBEDD4.7050505@optusnet.com.au> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:38:28 +0000 From: Andrew Sinclair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41DA0AB8.3080400@centtech.com> <41DABE72.2000501@optusnet.com.au> <20050104205643.GC13991@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050104205643.GC13991@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade system destruction? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 02:35:26 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:04:02PM +0000, Andrew Sinclair wrote: > > > >>Portupgrade makes a mess at the best of times. A recursive portupgrade >>is not so clever about dependencies, particually on a live system. On >>occasion, it even seems to tamper with core libraries which is what >>would have occured in your case. >> >> > >Can you provide some evidence of these claims? I'm suspicious :-) > >Kris > No, I can only tell you that I tried it, and stopped using it some time ago because of similar problems. Keep in mind I said, "seems to tamper with." I had an issue where some kind of linux centric library (not libc-client) was no longer available and several system utilities refused to start up. I tried reinstalling linux_base but that didn't fix it. Turned out it was a subtle change in the ports collection that required a little more than a [cvsup; portupgrade] to fix. On previous occasions, it attempted to upgrade 10x as many ports & dependencies as I wanted. It was more work than a manual deinstall, cvsup, reinstall. I came to the conclusion that automated tools are a poor excuse for not reading /usr/ports/UPDATING ;-) I usually research these problems before I say anything but figuring that Mr Anderson required immediate assistance, I risked using the infamous Ass-U-Me technique to speculate about the problem. Had I have known you'd be on his case the same day, I would not have said anything. By the way, sorry if I offended you with the, "with all due respect," quip Eric. I wasn't sure how to write that in a way that didn't seem offensive. :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 02:45:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F050416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:45:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6138643D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:45:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from BARTON (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.rr.com [65.184.201.54]) j052jrkc018297 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:45:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 02:50:42 +0000 From: jason henson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1104726087l.89396l.0l@BARTON> <441xd1ufkl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <441xd1ufkl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> (from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org on Tue Jan 4 15:03:54 2005) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.2.6 Message-Id: <1104893442l.3792l.0l@BARTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: rtc wants more hz! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 02:45:59 -0000 On 01/04/05 15:03:54, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > jason henson writes: >=20 > > I found this old thread on it: > > =20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-April/026160.html > > > > If I raise the hz option in my kernel config will it adversely > affect > > anything else like network performance? >=20 > That depends on a lot of things, including your hardware and your > typical workload. It could well *improve* your system performance. > Try it and see. [My set-of-the-pants guess is that it will have only > a minimal effect, but I may well be wrong.] >=20 > -- Thanks, I have no more rtc requests for a higher setting now in my =20 logs. I use ports/net/nvnet as my net work driver and here is some =20 info on what it is doing. hw.nv_pollinterval: 1000 dev.nv.0.%desc: NVIDIA nForce MCP2 Networking Adapter dev.nv.0.%driver: nv dev.nv.0.%location: slot=3D4 function=3D0 handle=3D\_SB_.PCI0.MMAC dev.nv.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=3D0x10de device=3D0x0066 subvendor=3D0x1695 =20 subdevice=3D0x1000 class=3D0x020000 dev.nv.0.%parent: pci0 dev.nv.0.wake: 0 dev.miibus.0.%parent: nv0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 02:50:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0A516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:50:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91.asp.att.net [204.127.203.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BC743D53 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m16e1@mchsi.com) Received: from yourvvx88vyrxo (12-216-86-146.client.mchsi.com[12.216.86.146]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with SMTP id <20050105025015m91000eerie>; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:50:20 +0000 Message-ID: <006501c4f2d1$4ee23230$9256d80c@yourvvx88vyrxo> From: "Tom Bratland" To: Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:50:18 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Unsubscribne failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 02:50:21 -0000 Hi! I've unsubscribed nunerous times, but I still get subscriber mail. Last msg below. Thanks, Tom m16e1@mchsi.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Anderson" To: "Kris Kennaway" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 8:33 PM Subject: Re: portupgrade system destruction? SOLVED Kris Kennaway wrote: [..snip..] >>>>I have a few dedicated servers at a hosting company (about 3 hours drive >>>>time away). On one of the systems I ran a 'portupgrade -arR' this >>>>morning, and then disconnected (I ran it in a screen session). About an >>>>hour later, I realized I could not log in anymore via ssh. Seems that I >>>>can connect, but my passwords fail (permission denied). I can't FTP in, >>>>or check mail with any username/password combos. Even my preshared SSH >>>>keys do not work. When connecting via POP, I get this message: >>>> >>>>Connected to hostname. >>>>Escape character is '^]'. >>>>/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc-client4.so.8" not found >>>>Connection closed by foreign host. >>>> >>>>Can anyone help me figure out what may have gone wrong? >>> >>> >>>Probably you're 1) using an ssh port instead of the base system >>>version, and 2) the portupgrade stalled or exited somewhere in between >>>updating a library it depends on and updating the port itself (ditto >>>for pop). System upgrades can be dangerous when you don't have a >>>fallback plan :-) >> >>Is ssh a port by default in 4.10? I thought it was in the base os.. How >>would that explain my ftp access problems too? Seems like they would >>not be tied.. > > > No. Something unexpected has clearly happened..maybe your system ran > out of swap space? For those that are curious - what happened was the night before, I installed a new port, but needed to change $PREFIX to a user's home area to set the port up in that particular spot. As expected, that went uneventfully. The next morning, I decided to do a portupgrade - and promptly went about cvsupping my ports, bla bla, and then doing a portupgrage -arR. However - I never unset the $PREFIX variable, so each port was being removed from the main system area, then the new port was being installed in a users' home area. Bash was one of the first to be done, which explains the login errors (/usr/local/bin/bash was removed from /etc/shells, and it was replaced with /home/username/usr/local....bash, so my shell in the passwd file no longer was in /etc/shells file). The portupgrade continued until some point when it basically killed itself off. I'm now recovering pieces of the installed packages. :) Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology When in doubt, mumble; when in trouble, delegate; when in charge, ponder ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 02:51:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD98416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:51:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92.asp.att.net [204.127.203.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934E543D45 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:51:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m16e1@mchsi.com) Received: from yourvvx88vyrxo (12-216-86-146.client.mchsi.com[12.216.86.146]) by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with SMTP id <20050105025122m9200a9akee>; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:51:22 +0000 Message-ID: <006b01c4f2d1$73799110$9256d80c@yourvvx88vyrxo> From: "Tom Bratland" To: Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:51:26 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: Unsubscribe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 02:51:23 -0000 Just got this: Mailing list removal confirmation notice for mailing list freebsd-chat We have received a request for the removal of your email address, "m16e1@mchsi.com" from the freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list. To confirm that you want to be removed from this mailing list, simply reply to this message. Or visit this web page: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/confirm/freebsd-chat/52795990545330fa93a711963dcc54b56ea14cef Or include the following line -- and only the following line -- in a message to freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org: confirm 52795990545330fa93a711963dcc54b56ea14cef Note that simply sending a `reply' to this message should work from most mail readers, since that usually leaves the Subject: line in the right form (additional "Re:" text in the Subject: is okay). If you do not wish to be removed from this list, please simply disregard this message. If you think you are being maliciously removed from the list, or have any other questions, send them to freebsd-chat-owner@freebsd.org. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 03:03:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A0316A4CF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:03:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ED643D54 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:03:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 19BA68567D; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:33:07 +1030 (CST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:33:07 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Tom Bratland Message-ID: <20050105030307.GG53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <006b01c4f2d1$73799110$9256d80c@yourvvx88vyrxo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MiFvc8Vo6wRSORdP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006b01c4f2d1$73799110$9256d80c@yourvvx88vyrxo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unsubscribe X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:03:12 -0000 --MiFvc8Vo6wRSORdP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 4 January 2005 at 20:51:26 -0600, Tom Bratland wrote: > Just got this: > > Mailing list removal confirmation notice for mailing list freebsd-chat > > We have received a request for the removal of your email address, > "m16e1@mchsi.com" from the freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing > list. ... OK. Are you saying that you didn't send this request? Then: > If you do not wish to be removed from this list, please simply > disregard this message. If you think you are being maliciously > removed from the list, or have any other questions, send them to > freebsd-chat-owner@freebsd.org. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --MiFvc8Vo6wRSORdP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB21jrIubykFB6QiMRArPWAKCCD3qiWb4vieAmc50K2aBuz0potwCffAfk WIma6nS9x90oqDGE4Nb3Ogk= =fI3V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MiFvc8Vo6wRSORdP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 03:03:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1ED16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:03:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41526.mail.yahoo.com (web41526.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.94.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EC2843D39 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jim0266@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 1953 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2005 03:03:42 -0000 Message-ID: <20050105030342.1951.qmail@web41526.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.93.161.48] by web41526.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:03:41 PST Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:03:41 -0800 (PST) From: Jim Arnold To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS (NOT ME)!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:03:42 -0000 I've hit a wall getting this to work: spike# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mDNSResponder.sh start .: Can't open /etc/rc.subr: No such file or directory Any ideas? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 03:16:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BDE16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:16:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mygirlfriday.info (mo-65-41-216-204.sta.sprint-hsd.net [65.41.216.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C01B343D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:16:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gv-list-freebsdquestions@mygirlfriday.info) Received: (qmail 8157 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2005 03:16:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAJOR) (192.168.0.5) by mongo.mygirlfriday.info with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 03:16:56 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:16:54 -0600 From: Gary Organization: Hardly X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <441309647.20050104211654@mygirlfriday.info> To: "Tom Bratland" In-Reply-To: <006501c4f2d1$4ee23230$9256d80c@yourvvx88vyrxo> References: <006501c4f2d1$4ee23230$9256d80c@yourvvx88vyrxo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Unsubscribne failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:16:58 -0000 Hi Tom, On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:50:18 -0600 UTC (1/4/2005, 8:50 PM -0600 UTC my time), Tom Bratland wrote: T> Hi! T> I've unsubscribed nunerous times, but I still get subscriber mail. The new Unsubscribe System mandates that each person who wishes to unsubscribe from a list, fill out *in triplicate* a Form UnSub-183-L. This *must* be done in hard copy. This form is then mailed to the Internet Unsubscription Bureau (IUB) in Tuscola, Illinois. Upon receipt of Form UnSub-183-L, the IUB will then prepare Form PU-876e, the "Petition for Unsubscription" which must then be mailed to the ISUPC (Internet Subscription -- Unsubscription Profiling Center) in Ludwig, Florida, which will conduct a thorough personal investigation of The Candidate for Unsubscription, which usually takes 6 to 8 weeks; unless there's a recount. The cost of this investigation, is usually around $300 to $500, and it must be paid for by The Candidate for Unsubscription, with the payment being sent to the (Internet Fee Processing Center) IFPC in Detroit,Michigan. All payments must be made in Krugerrands. No personal checks or credit cards are accepted. If all goes well with the personal investigation, The Candidate will receive Form STS-9387233, the Summons for Termination of Subscription Hearing. These hearings are held in one of three regional Locations throughout the country: Nome, Alaska -- Hilo, Hawaii -- and Key West, Florida. However hearings held in Florida are subject to many, many appeals so you might want to opt to have the jurisdiction moved to one of the other locations. Your personal attendance at these hearings is mandatory. The Candidate for Unsubscription is advised to bring legal representation with him or her to this hearing. A few people have managed to successfully represent themselves all the way to a successful unsubscription, but it's a rare occasion when they prevail without an attorney to represent their interests. At the hearing, a federal magistrate will hear the evidence and pleas regarding the Petition for Unsubscription and make a decision as to whether or not to proceed with the hearing or order a continuance until additional information can be processed. If the Petition to unsubscribe is found worthy of consideration a court date will be set, usually within a six month period. Of course, The Candidate for Unsubscription can expect a fairly rigorous cross-examination by the prosecutors. Many searching, embarrassing questions will be asked which might include: "If you could manage to scrape enough brain cells together to subscribe to a list, what happened when you decided to unsubscribe?" "What the heck is the matter with you?" or "Are you brain dead?" Then, of course, there's the Big One, "Can't you read instructions?" Depending on how the trial proceeds, many different things can happen, including a mistrial or a hung jury, which will result in entering the appeals process {and you know how the Florida appeals system works}, or jailing and torture of The Candidate for Unsubscription in a South American prison. These topics will be covered in a later edition of this newsletter. Or you could just send a blank email, using your email address you subscribed originally, to: List-Unsubscribe: or -- Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 03:25:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8919616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:25:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galilee.polands.org (CPE-24-208-53-189.new.rr.com [24.208.53.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D8943D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from email.polands.org (moab.polands.org [172.16.1.8]) by galilee.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j053OwRZ099450; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:25:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Message-ID: <50285.172.16.1.35.1104895509.squirrel@172.16.1.35> In-Reply-To: <41DB303B.3030608@ecad.org> References: <41DB303B.3030608@ecad.org> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:25:09 -0600 (CST) From: "Doug Poland" To: "Jev" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: migrating from mysql 4.0 to 4.1 best practice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:25:23 -0000 > Hi All, > > What is the best practice to upgrade from Mysql 4.0.X to 4.1.X, using > the ports system naturally? > > I have searched, but not come up with any definitive solutions. Is > the solution to backup, un-install, then install the other? > I've followed this documentation with success: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/Upgrading-from-4.0.html -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 03:37:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC7E16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:37:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galilee.polands.org (CPE-24-208-53-189.new.rr.com [24.208.53.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD65A43D1D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:37:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from jericho.polands.org (jericho.polands.org [172.16.1.35]) by galilee.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j053bCRZ099469 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:37:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from jericho.polands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jericho.polands.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j053bCUv043761 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:37:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from djp@jericho.polands.org) Received: (from djp@localhost) by jericho.polands.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j053bC1Z043760 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:37:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from djp) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:37:12 -0600 From: Doug Poland To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050105033712.GA43732@polands.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Ultra Speed CD-RW media and cdrecord X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:37:14 -0000 Hello, My son gave me a package of Memorex Ultra Speed CD-RW blanks for Christmas. I was going to burn an ISO on my 5.3-STABLE system but ran into a brick wall. cdrecord tells me that it's "Trying to use ultra high speed medium on improper writer." I've used "MultiSpeed 1x2x4x" media and "1x-4x Compatible" media in the past with no problems. Here's a transcript of the failed session: jericho# cdrecord -v dev=3,0 blank=all 4.11-RC2-i386-disc2.iso cdrecord: No write mode specified. cdrecord: Asuming -tao mode. cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent defaults. cdrecord: Continuing in 5 seconds... Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (i386-unknown-freebsd5.3) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Schilling TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM scsidev: '3,0' scsibus: 0 target: 3 lun: 0 Using libscg version 'schily-0.8'. SCSI buffer size: 64512 atapi: 0 Device type : Removable CD-ROM Version : 2 Response Format: 2 Capabilities : SYNC Vendor_info : 'YAMAHA ' Identifikation : 'CRW2100S ' Revision : '1.0N' Device seems to be: Generic mmc CD-RW. Current: 0x000A Profile: 0x0008 Profile: 0x0009 Profile: 0x000A (current) Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr). Driver flags : MMC-2 SWABAUDIO Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96P SAO/R96R RAW/R96R Drive buf size : 7582848 = 7405 KB FIFO size : 4194304 = 4096 KB Track 01: data 307 MB Total size: 352 MB (34:57.81) = 157336 sectors Lout start: 353 MB (34:59/61) = 157336 sectors Current Secsize: 2048 ATIP info from disk: Indicated writing power: 6 Reference speed: 0 Is not unrestricted Is erasable Disk sub type: Ultra High speed Rewritable media (2) ATIP start of lead in: -11744 (97:25/31) ATIP start of lead out: 359848 (79:59/73) 1T speed low: 16 1T speed high: 16 2T speed low: 8 2T speed high: 24 power mult factor: 1 4 recommended erase/write power: 3 A1 values: 66 18 B8 A2 values: 38 80 00 A3 values: 38 CF 88 Disk type: Phase change Manuf. index: 40 Manufacturer: INFODISC Technology Co., Ltd. Blocks total: 359848 Blocks current: 359848 Blocks remaining: 202512 cdrecord: Trying to use ultra high speed medium on improper writer. cdrecord: fifo had 1 puts and 0 gets. cdrecord: fifo was 0 times empty and 0 times full, min fill was 0%. FWIW, I've tried forcing it with various speed=x arguments but to no avail. Any suggestions? -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 03:41:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BC316A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:41:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbound3.mail.tds.net (outbound3.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A59E43D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:41:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rpvoland@spamcop.net) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (mdsnwi13-vlan436-73.dsl.tds.net [66.222.30.73])j053fAhF023320 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:41:12 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <41DB61B1.7050604@spamcop.net> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:40:33 -0600 From: Rick Voland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041230 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070302060507010300070201" Subject: device.hints and FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rpvoland@spamcop.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:41:15 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070302060507010300070201 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I would appreciate any suggestions to get FreeBSD 5.3 to recognize my Adaptec AHA-1542CP (ISA) SCSI card and my standard printer port. I recently replaced FreeBSD 4.10 with a completely, fresh install of FreeBSD 5.3. The FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE GENERIC kernel did not recognize either of these devices after installation, nor does my present SMP kernel. All these devices worked fine with FreeBSD 4.10 SMP using the current motherboard settings. FreeBSD 5.3 correctly recognizes an ISA-PNP soundcard (Audiotrix 3D-XG) which works fine with the Opensound System. The 1542CP and the printer port are the only problem devices as far as I can tell. They are recognized at the correct resources, but note the following messages. aha0 failed to probe on isa0 [I have previously tried setting specific resources that I know to be appropriate in device.hints, and still get the same message.] ppc0: parallel port found at 0x378 ppc0: using extended I/O port range ppc0: failed to probe at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 I have attached two text files: device.hints and dmesg-v.txt (verbose boot). Thank you, Rick Voland rpvoland@spamcop.net --------------070302060507010300070201 Content-Type: text/plain; name="device.hints" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="device.hints" # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC.hints,v 1.13 2004/04/01 21:48:31 alfred Exp $ hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" hint.fdc.0.at="isa" hint.fdc.0.port="0x3F0" hint.fdc.0.irq="6" hint.fdc.0.drq="2" hint.fd.0.at="fdc0" hint.fd.0.drive="0" hint.fd.1.at="fdc0" hint.fd.1.drive="1" hint.ata.0.at="isa" hint.ata.0.port="0x1F0" hint.ata.0.irq="14" hint.ata.1.at="isa" hint.ata.1.port="0x170" hint.ata.1.irq="15" hint.adv.0.at="isa" hint.adv.0.disabled="1" hint.bt.0.at="isa" hint.bt.0.disabled="1" hint.aha.0.at="isa" #hint.aha.0.irq="11" #hint.aha.0.port="0x334" #hint.aha.0.maddr="0xcc000" #hint.aha.0.drq="7" # hint.aha.0.disabled="1" hint.aic.0.at="isa" hint.aic.0.disabled="1" hint.atkbdc.0.at="isa" hint.atkbdc.0.port="0x060" hint.atkbd.0.at="atkbdc" hint.atkbd.0.irq="1" hint.psm.0.at="atkbdc" hint.psm.0.irq="12" hint.psm.0.disabled="1" hint.vga.0.at="isa" hint.sc.0.at="isa" hint.sc.0.flags="0x100" hint.vt.0.at="isa" hint.vt.0.disabled="1" hint.apm.0.disabled="1" hint.apm.0.flags="0x20" hint.pcic.0.at="isa" #hint.pcic.0.irq="10" # Default to polling hint.pcic.0.disabled="1" hint.pcic.0.port="0x3e0" hint.pcic.0.maddr="0xd0000" hint.pcic.1.at="isa" hint.pcic.1.irq="11" hint.pcic.1.port="0x3e2" hint.pcic.1.maddr="0xd4000" hint.pcic.1.disabled="1" hint.sio.0.at="isa" hint.sio.0.port="0x3F8" hint.sio.0.flags="0x10" hint.sio.0.irq="4" hint.sio.1.at="isa" hint.sio.1.port="0x2F8" hint.sio.1.irq="3" hint.sio.1.disabled="1" hint.sio.2.at="isa" hint.sio.2.disabled="1" hint.sio.2.port="0x3E8" hint.sio.2.irq="5" hint.sio.3.at="isa" hint.sio.3.disabled="1" hint.sio.3.port="0x2E8" hint.sio.3.irq="9" hint.ppc.0.at="isa" hint.ppc.0.irq="7" hint.ed.0.at="isa" hint.ed.0.disabled="1" hint.ed.0.port="0x280" hint.ed.0.irq="10" hint.ed.0.maddr="0xd8000" hint.cs.0.at="isa" hint.cs.0.disabled="1" hint.cs.0.port="0x300" hint.sn.0.at="isa" hint.sn.0.disabled="1" hint.sn.0.port="0x300" hint.sn.0.irq="10" hint.ie.0.at="isa" hint.ie.0.disabled="1" hint.ie.0.port="0x300" hint.ie.0.irq="10" hint.ie.0.maddr="0xd0000" hint.fe.0.at="isa" hint.fe.0.disabled="1" hint.fe.0.port="0x300" hint.lnc.0.at="isa" hint.lnc.0.disabled="1" hint.lnc.0.port="0x280" hint.lnc.0.irq="10" hint.lnc.0.drq="0" --------------070302060507010300070201 Content-Type: text/plain; name="dmesg-v.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dmesg-v.txt" Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #1: Tue Dec 28 21:44:33 CST 2004 root@brian.local.bsd:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BRIAN Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0a06000. Calibrating clock(s) ... i8254 clock: 1193086 Hz CLK_USE_I8254_CALIBRATION not specified - using default frequency Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 Calibrating TSC clock ... TSC clock: 232671718 Hz CPU: Pentium/P55C (232.67-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x543 Stepping = 3 Features=0x8003bf real memory = 268435456 (256 MB) Physical memory chunk(s): 0x0000000000001000 - 0x000000000009efff, 647168 bytes (158 pages) 0x0000000000100000 - 0x00000000003fffff, 3145728 bytes (768 pages) 0x0000000000c29000 - 0x000000000fb4ffff, 250769408 bytes (61223 pages) avail memory = 253038592 (241 MB) MP Configuration Table version 1.1 found at 0xc00f1400 APIC: Using the MPTable enumerator. SMP: Added CPU 0 (BSP) SMP: Added CPU 1 (AP) MPTable: APIC ID: physical 0, logical 0:0 APIC ID: physical 1, logical 0:1 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 bios32: Found BIOS32 Service Directory header at 0xc00fb090 bios32: Entry = 0xfb510 (c00fb510) Rev = 0 Len = 1 pcibios: PCI BIOS entry at 0xf0000+0xb540 pnpbios: Found PnP BIOS data at 0xc00fc070 pnpbios: Entry = f0000:c098 Rev = 1.0 Other BIOS signatures found: Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug ioapic0: Assuming intbase of 0 ioapic0: Routing external 8259A's -> intpin 0 ioapic0: intpin 0 -> ExtINT (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 1 -> ISA IRQ 1 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 2 -> ISA IRQ 2 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 3 -> ISA IRQ 3 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 4 -> ISA IRQ 4 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 5 -> ISA IRQ 5 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 6 -> ISA IRQ 6 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 7 -> ISA IRQ 7 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 8 -> ISA IRQ 8 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 9 -> ISA IRQ 9 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 10 -> ISA IRQ 10 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 11 -> ISA IRQ 11 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 12 -> ISA IRQ 12 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 13 -> ISA IRQ 13 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 14 -> ISA IRQ 14 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 15 -> ISA IRQ 15 (edge, high) ioapic0: intpin 16 -> PCI IRQ 16 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 17 -> PCI IRQ 17 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 18 -> PCI IRQ 18 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 19 -> PCI IRQ 19 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 20 -> PCI IRQ 20 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 21 -> PCI IRQ 21 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 22 -> PCI IRQ 22 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 23 -> PCI IRQ 23 (level, low) ioapic0: intpin 1 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 1 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 1 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 2 bus ISA ioapic0: Routing IRQ 0 -> intpin 2 ioapic0: intpin 2 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 2 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 4 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 4 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 4 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 5 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 5 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 5 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 6 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 6 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 6 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 7 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 7 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 7 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 8 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 8 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 8 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 10 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 10 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 10 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 11 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 11 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 11 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 13 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 13 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 13 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 14 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 14 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 14 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 15 bus ISA ioapic0: intpin 15 trigger: edge ioapic0: intpin 15 polarity: high ioapic0: intpin 16 bus ISA ioapic0: Routing IRQ 12 -> intpin 16 ioapic0: intpin 12 disabled ioapic0: intpin 16 trigger: level ioapic0: intpin 16 polarity: low ioapic0: intpin 17 bus ISA ioapic0: Routing IRQ 3 -> intpin 17 ioapic0: intpin 3 disabled ioapic0: intpin 17 trigger: level ioapic0: intpin 17 polarity: low ioapic0: intpin 18 bus ISA ioapic0: Routing IRQ 9 -> intpin 18 ioapic0: intpin 9 disabled ioapic0: intpin 18 trigger: level ioapic0: intpin 18 polarity: low lapic: Routing ExtINT -> LINT0 lapic: Routing NMI -> LINT1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard cpu0 BSP: ID: 0x00000000 VER: 0x00030010 LDR: 0x01000000 DFR: 0x0fffffff lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00000400 TPR: 0x00000000 SVR: 0x000001ff wlan: <802.11 Link Layer> null: random: io: mem: npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pci_open(1): mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x8000005c pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x80000000 (0x80000000) pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=060000] [hdr=00] is there (id=12508086) pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 Found $PIR table, 5 entries at 0xc00fde10 PCI-Only Interrupts: 3 9 12 Location Bus Device Pin Link IRQs slot 1 0 20 A 0x60 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 1 0 20 B 0x61 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 1 0 20 C 0x62 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 1 0 20 D 0x63 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 2 0 19 A 0x61 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 2 0 19 B 0x62 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 2 0 19 C 0x63 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 2 0 19 D 0x60 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 3 0 18 A 0x62 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 3 0 18 B 0x63 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 3 0 18 C 0x60 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 3 0 18 D 0x61 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 4 0 17 A 0x63 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 4 0 17 B 0x60 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 4 0 17 C 0x61 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 slot 4 0 17 D 0x62 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pir0: on motherboard $PIR: Links after initial probe: Link IRQ Rtd Ref IRQs 0x60 255 N 4 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 0x61 255 N 4 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 0x62 255 N 4 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 0x63 255 N 4 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 $PIR: Found matching pin for 0.20.INTA at func 0: 12 $PIR: Found matching pin for 0.19.INTA at func 0: 3 $PIR: Found matching pin for 0.18.INTA at func 0: 9 $PIR: Links after initial IRQ discovery: Link IRQ Rtd Ref IRQs 0x60 12 Y 4 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 0x61 3 Y 4 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 0x62 9 Y 4 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 0x63 255 N 4 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 14 15 $PIR: IRQs used by BIOS: 3 9 12 $PIR: Interrupt Weights: [ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ] [ 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 ] pci0: on pcib0 pci0: physical bus=0 found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x1250, revid=0x03 bus=0, slot=0, func=0 class=06-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0006, statreg=0x2200, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x40 (1920 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x7000, revid=0x01 bus=0, slot=7, func=0 class=06-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=1 cmdreg=0x000f, statreg=0x0280, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) map[20]: type 4, range 32, base 0000f000, size 4, enabled found-> vendor=0x8086, dev=0x7010, revid=0x00 bus=0, slot=7, func=1 class=01-01-80, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0005, statreg=0x0280, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x40 (1920 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) map[10]: type 3, range 32, base e0000000, size 24, enabled map[14]: type 4, range 32, base 00006400, size 8, enabled map[18]: type 1, range 32, base e1000000, size 12, enabled $PIR: 0:18 INTA routed to irq 9 found-> vendor=0x1002, dev=0x4750, revid=0x5c bus=0, slot=18, func=0 class=03-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0087, statreg=0x0280, cachelnsz=8 (dwords) lattimer=0x40 (1920 ns), mingnt=0x08 (2000 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns) intpin=a, irq=9 map[10]: type 4, range 32, base 00006800, size 7, enabled map[14]: type 1, range 32, base e1001000, size 7, enabled $PIR: 0:19 INTA routed to irq 3 found-> vendor=0x10b7, dev=0x9055, revid=0x30 bus=0, slot=19, func=0 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0007, statreg=0x0210, cachelnsz=8 (dwords) lattimer=0x40 (1920 ns), mingnt=0x0a (2500 ns), maxlat=0x0a (2500 ns) intpin=a, irq=3 powerspec 1 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 map[10]: type 4, range 32, base 00006c00, size 5, enabled $PIR: 0:20 INTA routed to irq 12 found-> vendor=0x1044, dev=0xa400, revid=0x02 bus=0, slot=20, func=0 class=01-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0007, statreg=0x0200, cachelnsz=8 (dwords) lattimer=0xa0 (4800 ns), mingnt=0x04 (1000 ns), maxlat=0x08 (2000 ns) intpin=a, irq=12 isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0 atapci0: Reserved 0x10 bytes for rid 0x20 type 4 at 0xf000 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0x1f0 atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x14 type 4 at 0x3f6 ata0: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 ata0-master: stat=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata0-slave: stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata0: reset tp2 stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x1 ata0: [MPSAFE] ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x18 type 4 at 0x170 atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x1c type 4 at 0x376 ata1: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 ata1-master: stat=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata1-slave: stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata1: reset tp2 stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x1 ata1: [MPSAFE] pci0: at device 18.0 (no driver attached) xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x6800-0x687f mem 0xe1001000-0xe100107f irq 3 at device 19.0 on pci0 xl0: Reserved 0x80 bytes for rid 0x14 type 3 at 0xe1001000 xl0: using memory mapped I/O xl0: media options word: a xl0: found MII/AUTO miibus0: on xl0 xlphy0: <3Com internal media interface> on miibus0 xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: bpf attached xl0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:17:0b:48 xl0: [MPSAFE] dpt0: port 0x6c00-0x6c1f irq 12 at device 20.0 on pci0 dpt0: Reserved 0x20 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0x6c00 dpt0: DPT PM2044UW FW Rev. 07H1, 1 channel, 64 CCBs dpt0: [GIANT-LOCKED] cpu0 on motherboard cpu1 on motherboard ata: ata0 already exists; skipping it ata: ata1 already exists; skipping it Trying Read_Port at 203 MPI0001: start dependent (0) MPI0001: adding io range 0x220-0x22f, size=0x10, align=0x10 MPI0001: adding io range 0x530-0x537, size=0x8, align=0x8 MPI0001: adding io range 0x388-0x38b, size=0x4, align=0x4 MPI0001: adding io range 0x330-0x331, size=0x2, align=0x2 MPI0001: adding io range 0x370-0x371, size=0x2, align=0x2 MPI0001: adding irq mask 0x400 MPI0001: adding irq mask 0x20 MPI0001: adding dma mask 0x1 MPI0001: adding dma mask 0x2 MPI0001: start dependent (1) MPI0001: adding io range 0x240-0x24f, size=0x10, align=0x10 MPI0001: adding io range 0xe80-0xe87, size=0x8, align=0x8 MPI0001: adding io range 0x388-0x38b, size=0x4, align=0x4 MPI0001: adding io range 0x300-0x301, size=0x2, align=0x2 MPI0001: adding io range 0x100-0xfff, size=0x2, align=0x2 MPI0001: adding irq mask 0xe80 MPI0001: adding irq mask 0x6a0 MPI0001: adding dma mask 0xb MPI0001: adding dma mask 0xb MPI0001: start dependent (2) MPI0001: adding io range 0x220-0x28f, size=0x10, align=0x10 MPI0001: adding io range 0x530-0xf4f, size=0x8, align=0x8 MPI0001: adding io range 0x388-0x3fb, size=0x4, align=0x8 MPI0001: adding io range 0x300-0x335, size=0x2, align=0x2 MPI0001: adding io range 0x100-0xfff, size=0x2, align=0x2 MPI0001: adding irq mask 0xea0 MPI0001: adding irq mask 0xea0 MPI0001: adding dma mask 0xb MPI0001: adding dma mask 0xb MPI0001: end dependent MPI0002: start dependent (0) MPI0002: adding io range 0x201-0x201, size=0x1, align=0x1 MPI0002: start dependent (1) MPI0002: adding io range 0x202-0x202, size=0x1, align=0x1 MPI0002: start dependent (1) MPI0002: adding io range 0x203-0x203, size=0x1, align=0x1 MPI0002: start dependent (1) MPI0002: adding io range 0x204-0x20f, size=0x1, align=0x1 MPI0002: end dependent ADP1542: adding irq mask 0xdc00 ADP1542: adding dma mask 0xe0 ADP1542: start dependent (0) ADP1542: adding io range 0x330-0x333, size=0x4, align=0x4 ADP1542: start dependent (1) ADP1542: adding io range 0x334-0x337, size=0x4, align=0x4 ADP1542: start dependent (1) ADP1542: adding io range 0x234-0x237, size=0x4, align=0x4 ADP1542: start dependent (1) ADP1542: adding io range 0x230-0x233, size=0x4, align=0x4 ADP1542: start dependent (1) ADP1542: adding io range 0x134-0x137, size=0x4, align=0x4 ADP1542: start dependent (2) ADP1542: adding io range 0x130-0x133, size=0x4, align=0x4 ADP1542: end dependent ADP1542: adding memory range 0xc8000-0xdffff, size=0x4000, align=0x4000 ex_isa_identify() unknown: status reg test failed ff unknown: status reg test failed ff unknown: status reg test failed ff unknown: status reg test failed ff unknown: status reg test failed ff pnpbios: 13 devices, largest 126 bytes PNP0200: adding dma mask 0x10 PNP0200: adding io range 0-0xf, size=0x10, align=0 PNP0200: adding io range 0x81-0x83, size=0x3, align=0 PNP0200: adding io range 0x87-0x87, size=0x1, align=0 PNP0200: adding io range 0x89-0x8b, size=0x3, align=0 PNP0200: adding io range 0x8f-0x91, size=0x3, align=0 PNP0200: adding io range 0xc0-0xdf, size=0x20, align=0 pnpbios: handle 1 device ID PNP0200 (0002d041) PNP0100: adding irq mask 0x1 PNP0100: adding io range 0x40-0x43, size=0x4, align=0 pnpbios: handle 2 device ID PNP0100 (0001d041) PNP0b00: adding irq mask 0x100 PNP0b00: adding io range 0x70-0x71, size=0x2, align=0 pnpbios: handle 3 device ID PNP0b00 (000bd041) PNP0303: adding irq mask 0x2 PNP0303: adding io range 0x60-0x60, size=0x1, align=0 PNP0303: adding io range 0x64-0x64, size=0x1, align=0 pnpbios: handle 4 device ID PNP0303 (0303d041) PNP0800: adding io range 0x61-0x61, size=0x1, align=0 pnpbios: handle 5 device ID PNP0800 (0008d041) PNP0c04: adding irq mask 0x2000 PNP0c04: adding io range 0xf0-0xff, size=0x10, align=0 pnpbios: handle 6 device ID PNP0c04 (040cd041) PNP0c01: adding fixed memory32 range 0xf0000-0xf3fff, size=0x4000 PNP0c01: adding fixed memory32 range 0xf4000-0xf7fff, size=0x4000 PNP0c01: adding fixed memory32 range 0xf8000-0xfbfff, size=0x4000 PNP0c01: adding fixed memory32 range 0xfc000-0xfffff, size=0x4000 PNP0c01: adding fixed memory32 range 0-0x9ffff, size=0xa0000 PNP0c01: adding fixed memory32 range 0xfffe0000-0xffffffff, size=0x20000 PNP0c01: adding fixed memory32 range 0xfec00000-0xfec0ffff, size=0x10000 PNP0c01: adding fixed memory32 range 0xfee00000-0xfee0ffff, size=0x10000 PNP0c01: adding fixed memory32 range 0x100000-0xfffffff, size=0xff00000 pnpbios: handle 7 device ID PNP0c01 (010cd041) PNP0a03: adding io range 0x4d0-0x4d1, size=0x2, align=0 PNP0a03: adding io range 0xcf8-0xcff, size=0x8, align=0 PNP0a03: adding io range 0x480-0x48f, size=0x10, align=0 pnpbios: handle 8 device ID PNP0a03 (030ad041) PNP0c02: adding io range 0x208-0x20f, size=0x8, align=0 pnpbios: handle 9 device ID PNP0c02 (020cd041) PNP0501: adding irq mask 0x10 PNP0501: adding io range 0x3f8-0x3ff, size=0x8, align=0 pnpbios: handle 10 device ID PNP0501 (0105d041) PNP0700: adding dma mask 0x4 PNP0700: adding io range 0x3f2-0x3f5, size=0x4, align=0 PNP0700: adding irq mask 0x40 pnpbios: handle 11 device ID PNP0700 (0007d041) PNP0400: adding irq mask 0x80 PNP0400: adding io range 0x378-0x37f, size=0x8, align=0 pnpbios: handle 12 device ID PNP0400 (0004d041) ahc_isa_probe 6: ioport 0x6c00 alloc failed sc: sc0 already exists; skipping it vga: vga0 already exists; skipping it isa_probe_children: disabling PnP devices isa_probe_children: probing non-PnP devices orm0: at iomem 0xcc000-0xcffff,0xc8000-0xc8fff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 adv0: not probed (disabled) aha0 failed to probe on isa0 aic0: not probed (disabled) atkbdc0: at port 0x64,0x60 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 atkbd: the current kbd controller command byte 0065 atkbd: keyboard ID 0x41ab (2) kbd0 at atkbd0 kbd0: atkbd0, AT 101/102 (2), config:0x0, flags:0x3d0000 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: not probed (disabled) bt0: not probed (disabled) cs0: not probed (disabled) ed0: not probed (disabled) fdc0: ic_type 90 part_id 80 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fdc0: ic_type 90 part_id 80 fdc0: [MPSAFE] fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 fd1: <1200-KB 5.25" drive> on fdc0 drive 1 fe0: not probed (disabled) ie0: not probed (disabled) lnc0: not probed (disabled) pcic0: not probed (disabled) pcic1: not probed (disabled) ppc0: parallel port found at 0x378 ppc0: using extended I/O port range ppc0: failed to probe at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sc0: fb0, kbd0, terminal emulator: sc (syscons terminal) sio0: irq maps: 0xe001 0xe011 0xe001 0xe001 sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: not probed (disabled) sio2: not probed (disabled) sio3: not probed (disabled) sn0: not probed (disabled) vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 fb0: vga0, vga, type:VGA (5), flags:0x7007f fb0: port:0x3c0-0x3df, crtc:0x3d4, mem:0xa0000 0x20000 fb0: init mode:24, bios mode:3, current mode:24 fb0: window:0xc00b8000 size:32k gran:32k, buf:0 size:32k VGA parameters upon power-up 50 18 10 00 00 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 07 80 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff VGA parameters in BIOS for mode 24 50 18 10 00 10 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 00 00 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff EGA/VGA parameters to be used for mode 24 50 18 10 00 10 00 03 00 02 67 5f 4f 50 82 55 81 bf 1f 00 4f 0d 0e 00 00 00 00 9c 8e 8f 28 1f 96 b9 a3 ff 00 01 02 03 04 05 14 07 38 39 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 0c 00 0f 08 00 00 00 00 00 10 0e 00 ff vt0: not probed (disabled) aha1: status reg test failed ff aha1 failed to probe at port 0x334-0x337 on isa0 isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x220 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x230. Failing probe. unknown: failed to probe at port 0x370-0x371,0x330-0x331,0x388-0x38b,0x530-0x537,0x220-0x22f irq 5,10 drq 1,0 on isa0 adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x201 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x210. Failing probe. unknown: failed to probe at port 0x201 on isa0 aha2: status reg test failed 0 adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x332 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x330. Failing probe. unknown: failed to probe at port 0x332-0x335 iomem 0xd0000-0xd3fff irq 11 drq 5 on isa0 adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x0 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x100. Failing probe. adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x40 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x100. Failing probe. adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x70 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x100. Failing probe. unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: at port 0x60 on isa0 adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x61 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x100. Failing probe. unknown: failed to probe at port 0x61 on isa0 adv1: Invalid baseport of 0xf0 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x100. Failing probe. adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x4d0 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x330. Failing probe. adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x208 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x210. Failing probe. unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: at port 0x3f8-0x3ff on isa0 unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: at port 0x3f2-0x3f5 on isa0 adv1: Invalid baseport of 0x378 specified. Nearest valid baseport is 0x330. Failing probe. ppc1: using extended I/O port range unknown: failed to probe at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 Device configuration finished. procfs registered Timecounter "TSC" frequency 232671718 Hz quality -100 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec lo0: bpf attached ata0-master: pio=0x0c wdma=0x22 udma=0x42 cable=80pin ata0-master: setting PIO4 on Intel PIIX3 chip ata0-master: setting WDMA2 on Intel PIIX3 chip ad0: ATA-4 disk at ata0-master ad0: 19470MB (39876480 sectors), 39560 C, 16 H, 63 S, 512 B ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, WDMA2 ar: FreeBSD check1 failed ata1-master: pio=0x0c wdma=0x22 udma=0x45 cable=80pin ata1-master: setting PIO4 on Intel PIIX3 chip ata1-master: setting WDMA2 on Intel PIIX3 chip ad2: ATA-5 disk at ata1-master ad2: 19073MB (39062500 sectors), 38752 C, 16 H, 63 S, 512 B ad2: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, WDMA2 ar: FreeBSD check1 failed Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle GEOM: new disk ad0 GEOM: new disk ad2 [0] f:80 typ:6 s(CHS):0/1/1 e(CHS):126/254/63 s:63 l:2040192 [1] f:00 typ:167 s(CHS):127/0/1 e(CHS):387/254/63 s:2040255 l:4192965 [2] f:00 typ:28 s(CHS):388/0/1 e(CHS):1023/254/63 s:6233220 l:33640110 [3] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 GEOM: Configure ad0s1, start 32256 length 1044578304 end 1044610559 GEOM: Configure ad0s2, start 1044610560 length 2146798080 end 3191408639 GEOM: Configure ad0s3, start 3191408640 length 17223736320 end 20415144959 [0] f:00 typ:147 s(CHS):0/1/1 e(CHS):12/254/63 s:63 l:208782 [1] f:00 typ:6 s(CHS):13/0/1 e(CHS):272/254/63 s:208845 l:4176900 [2] f:00 typ:146 s(CHS):273/0/1 e(CHS):402/254/63 s:4385745 l:2088450 [3] f:00 typ:5 s(CHS):403/0/1 e(CHS):1023/254/63 s:6474195 l:32579820 GEOM: Configure ad2s1, start 32256 length 106896384 end 106928639 GEOM: Configure ad2s2, start 106928640 length 2138572800 end 2245501439 GEOM: Configure ad2s3, start 2245501440 length 1069286400 end 3314787839 GEOM: Configure ad2s4, start 3314787840 length 16680867840 end 19995655679 MBREXT Slice 5 on ad2s4: [0] f:00 typ:131 s(CHS):403/1/1 e(CHS):1023/254/63 s:63 l:20482812 [1] f:00 typ:5 s(CHS):1023/254/63 e(CHS):1023/254/63 s:20482875 l:12096945 GEOM: Configure ad2s5, start 32256 length 10487199744 end 10487231999 MBREXT Slice 6 on ad2s4: [0] f:00 typ:131 s(CHS):1023/254/63 e(CHS):1023/254/63 s:63 l:12096882 [1] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 GEOM: Configure ad2s6, start 10487264256 length 6193603584 end 16680867839 (probe3:dpt0:0:3:0): error 22 (probe3:dpt0:0:3:0): Unretryable Error pass0 at dpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 pass0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device pass0: Serial Number 3FA0A0X300007221AV1L pass0: Tagged Queueing Enabled pass1 at dpt0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 pass1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device pass1: Serial Number AYF30763 pass1: Tagged Queueing Enabled pass2 at dpt0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 pass2: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): error 6 (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): Unretryable Error cd0 at dpt0 bus 0 target 3 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da0 at dpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: Serial Number 3FA0A0X300007221AV1L da0: Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 17547MB (35937405 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2237C) da1 at dpt0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: Serial Number AYF30763 da1: Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 6208MB (12715408 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 791C) GEOM: new disk cd0 GEOM: new disk da0 GEOM: new disk da1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! cpu1 AP: ID: 0x01000000 VER: 0x00030010 LDR: 0x02000000 DFR: 0x0fffffff lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x00000000 SVR: 0x000001ff ioapic0: routing intpin 1 (ISA IRQ 1) to cluster 0 ioapic0: routing intpin 4 (ISA IRQ 4) to cluster 0 ioapic0: routing intpin 6 (ISA IRQ 6) to cluster 0 ioapic0: routing intpin 8 (ISA IRQ 8) to cluster 0 ioapic0: routing intpin 13 (ISA IRQ 13) to cluster 0 ioapic0: routing intpin 14 (ISA IRQ 14) to cluster 0 ioapic0: routing intpin 15 (ISA IRQ 15) to cluster 0 ioapic0: routing intpin 16 (ISA IRQ 12) to cluster 0 ioapic0: routing intpin 17 (ISA IRQ 3) to cluster 0 (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): error 6 (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): Unretryable Error (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): error 6 (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): Unretryable Error (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): error 6 (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): Unretryable Error (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): error 6 (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): Unretryable Error (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): error 6 (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): Unretryable Error (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): error 6 (cd0:dpt0:0:3:0): Unretryable Error [0] f:80 typ:165 s(CHS):0/1/1 e(CHS):1023/254/63 s:63 l:35937342 [1] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 [2] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 [3] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 GEOM: Configure da0s1, start 32256 length 18399919104 end 18399951359 [0] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 [1] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 [2] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 [3] f:00 typ:0 s(CHS):0/0/0 e(CHS):0/0/0 s:0 l:0 GEOM: Configure da0s1a, start 0 length 524288000 end 524287999 GEOM: Configure da0s1b, start 3745513472 length 1073741824 end 4819255295 GEOM: Configure da0s1c, start 0 length 18399919104 end 18399919103 GEOM: Configure da0s1d, start 524288000 length 3221225472 end 3745513471 GEOM: Configure da0s1e, start 4819255296 length 13580663808 end 18399919103 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a start_init: trying /sbin/init ioapic0: routing intpin 10 (ISA IRQ 10) to cluster 0 ioapic0: routing intpin 5 (ISA IRQ 5) to cluster 0 Linux ELF exec handler installed xl0: transmission error: 90 xl0: tx underrun, increasing tx start threshold to 120 bytes --------------070302060507010300070201-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 03:58:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1705F16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:58:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whisk.dreamhost.com (whisk.dreamhost.com [205.196.208.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07E743D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 03:58:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (user-33qt9ff.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.165.239]) by whisk.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0AF175112; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:58:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20050105030342.1951.qmail@web41526.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050105030342.1951.qmail@web41526.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <0850FBDB-5ECE-11D9-AD48-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:58:17 -0500 To: Jim Arnold X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS (NOT ME)!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:58:22 -0000 On Jan 4, 2005, at 10:03 PM, Jim Arnold wrote: > I've hit a wall getting this to work: > > spike# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mDNSResponder.sh start > .: Can't open /etc/rc.subr: No such file or directory Andrew Gould mentioned "/usr/ports/sysutils/rc_subr A good explanation: http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/rc_subr/" I assume that I already had that installed from another port, I don't remember installing it manually for this. TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:14:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B06B16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:14:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD9743D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:14:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2/d) with ESMTP id j054Dup7019703; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:13:56 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:13:56 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200501050413.j054DuOB019702@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: parv@pair.com Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:14:51 -0000 On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:21:06 -0500 Parv wrote: >in message <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu>, >wrote Scott Bennett thusly... >> >> I've downloaded the following ISO image files: >> >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso >> >> I've also tried burning the first file to CD-Rs using Windows XP >> Home's own facilities and using Sonic RecordNow! under said >> system, but did not get bootable CDs either way. > >First time i tried the software of same name unknown version (IBM >ThinkPad T42, Windows XP Professional), i selected "Data Disc" and >chose the ISO image. Well, it did do its job: i got the ISO image >/file/ on the CD. > >After more poking around in the software interface, "Burn Image" or >some such option was revealed under the heading of "Data Disc" or >some such. And, that too did its job: i got the mini install ISO >image on CD to boot with. > Thanks for the suggestion. I've now gone back and found the little green button in Sonic RecordNow! for making a bootable CD. I then tried it with each of the first two files noted above. The CDs written via the green button do get a little farther than before. In the earlier case, the machine barely glanced at the CD before deciding to boot from the hard drive after all. The green button CDs, instead, run far enough to display a message in the upper left corner of the screen that says, "Missing operating system", and then hang. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:17:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0B616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:17:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B9343D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:17:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) id j054HCmG035621; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:17:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:17:12 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Doug Poland Message-ID: <20050105041712.GA18285@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050105033712.GA43732@polands.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050105033712.GA43732@polands.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ultra Speed CD-RW media and cdrecord X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:17:19 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 04), Doug Poland said: > My son gave me a package of Memorex Ultra Speed CD-RW blanks for > Christmas. I was going to burn an ISO on my 5.3-STABLE system but > ran into a brick wall. > > cdrecord tells me that it's "Trying to use ultra high speed medium on > improper writer." I've used "MultiSpeed 1x2x4x" media and "1x-4x > Compatible" media in the past with no problems. >From a quick scan of the cdrecord source and some searches, it looks like Ultra Speed media require write speeds of 16x or faster, but your 2100S can only write CD-RW media at 10x (it can do CD-R's at 16x). You can use the -force flag to make cdrecord write to the disks, but no guarantees. It'd be nice if cdrecrd's error message printed the limits of drive and media instead of just saying that something's "improper" :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:28:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F9116A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:28:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF6E43D49 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:28:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp247-7.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net [203.122.247.7]) j054S3RF095822; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:58:04 +1030 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Timothy Luoma , FreeBSD-Questions Questions Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:58:02 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> In-Reply-To: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501051458.03000.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: modem not responding to mgetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:28:07 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:27 am, Timothy Luoma wrote: > I have been attempting to setup mgetty (installed from ports) to allow > me to dial IN to my FreeBSD 5.3 machine. > > $ mgetty -V > mgetty+sendfax by Gert Doering > experimental test release 1.1.31-Jul24 > > log file written to '/var/log/mgetty.' > config file read from '/usr/local/etc/mgetty+sendfax/mgetty.config' > > (FWIW, the modem works under WinXP for dialing *out*. XP reports it as: > "PCI Slot 2 PCI Bus 1, Device 1, function 0" on "COM3") > > FreeBSD seems to see it: > > $ dmesg|grep "^sio" > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > > (it is /dev/cuaa0 on FreeBSD) This looks like the standard serial port known as COM1 in windows. (cuua0 is for outgoing connections -- incoming would normally be on ttyd0) You probably want cuua2 or ttyd2 and may need to do something with the device.hints file to get these to appear. > > However, it will not respond to calls. Checking the mgetty log, I see > this: > > -- > 01/04 12:46:55 aa0 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.31-Jul24 > 01/04 12:46:55 aa0 check for lockfiles > 01/04 12:46:55 aa0 locking the line > 01/04 12:46:56 aa0 WARNING: DSR is off - modem turned off or bad cable? > 01/04 12:46:56 aa0 lowering DTR to reset Modem > 01/04 12:46:57 aa0 send: ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1[0d] > 01/04 12:46:57 aa0 waiting for ``OK'' > 01/04 12:47:17 aa0 timeout in chat script, waiting for `OK' > 01/04 12:47:17 aa0 init chat timed out, trying force-init-chat > 01/04 12:47:17 aa0 send: \d[10][03]\d\d\d+++\d\d\d[0d]\dATQ0V1H0[0d] > 01/04 12:47:21 aa0 waiting for ``OK'' > 01/04 12:47:41 aa0 timeout in chat script, waiting for `OK' > 01/04 12:47:41 aa0 init chat failed, exiting...: Interrupted system > call > 01/04 12:47:41 ##### failed in mg_init_data, dev=cuaa0, pid=6780 > -- > Certainly appears that mgetty is not looking at the modem port but an ordinary serial port. I don't believe you should need mgetty for basic modem login -- getty should work. Set ttyd2 to "on" in /etc/ttys. However listen to what others have to say -- I don't claim to be expert in this area -- especially not with the new features of 5.x Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:37:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E384916A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:37:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770C343D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:37:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:37:45 -0600 Message-ID: <41DB6EEC.4010704@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 22:37:00 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael References: <41DB1C74.2000809@optusnet.com.au> In-Reply-To: <41DB1C74.2000809@optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2005 04:37:45.0723 (UTC) FILETIME=[4D5504B0:01C4F2E0] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: canon lbp-1210 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:37:04 -0000 Hello, Michael --- (format corrected) Please wrap your lines at about 70 characters to help your post be more "friendly" to those of us who use text-only MUA's on console machines.... Michael wrote: > I'm trying to get my canon lbp-1210 to work under freebsd, it > doesn't have any emulation and seems to be a windows only > printer. Possibly correct, but IANAE and can't say for sure. > Is there anyway to use windows drivers under freebsd for the printer? > (EG: like the ndiswrapper is used to make windows network drivers > work under freebsd) > I haven't heard of anything, but keep reading, if you will... > When I plug in the printer to my freebsd4.10 machine into > the USB slot it comes up as a 'ugen' which says to me that > the computer doesn't know what the device is at all. I've tried > installing CUPs and looking for a suitable driver through CUPs > but couldn't find one. I'm now trying to find alternatives. I would suggest trying aspfilter then, also in ports. > The printer has USB and parallel and prints fine under windows. > What about if I put a windows box as my printer server and is it > possible to send printing through samba so that windows will > catch it and convert it to the crappy printer of mine? > (EG: RAW --> Canon LBP-1210 windows drivers). > > ~Michael I do this at home via apsfilter (which automagically did most of the Samba stuff for me) to a HP 6110 multi-function on an XP box via Ethernet, so it might work for you, but YMMV.... HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:48:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BA616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:48:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0565A43D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:48:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j054mbj26195; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:48:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:48:37 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200501050019.j050JOWL048792@chosa.michosa.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Sudden reboots with ProLiant DL360 G3 and 5.3-RELEASE-p2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:48:40 -0000 We have 2 DL360's that we bought off Ebay several years ago, intending to run Solaris 8 on both of them. One of them we loaded Solaris 8 on and it runs flawlessly. The other we loaded Solaris 8 on and it reboots all the time. Needless to say the second one runs Windows 2K just fine. The configurations of software and hardware are identical. I am pretty disgusted with the situation and Compaq/HP is no help - and we have a sister company that is a Compaq dealer. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of federico > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 4:19 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Sudden reboots with ProLiant DL360 G3 and 5.3-RELEASE-p2 > > > Hello, we have a ProLiant DL360 Generation 3 Server with 5.3-RELEASE-p2 > installed. The problem is that every now and then the server suddenly > reboots. > > I had the problem from the first install. At the beginning the > server would > suddenly reboot during buildworld. Then, in the BIOS I the changed the > Multi-Processor Specification Table Mode from Auto Set Table to Full Table > Mapped, and Buildworld was able to finish successfully. I tried the other > MPS settings, updating to the latest BIOS of the serve, loading > FreeBSD with > ACPI disabled, but the problem continues. Nothing is logged > prior the every > reboot, so I have no clue as to what might be causing the problem. > > We bought two identical servers at the same time. The other does not have > any problems. > > HP help support is not very good and FreeBSD is not among their supported > operating systems for this server, so could anybody please help? > Please let > me know what kind of information would be useful to troubleshot this > problem, I will produce it. > > Thank you very much. > > federico > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:50:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B1716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:50:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A673E43D48 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:50:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j054o6j26209; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:50:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Boris Spirialitious" , Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:50:05 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050104232430.47305.qmail@web61305.mail.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:50:08 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Boris > Spirialitious > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 3:25 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD > > > None of the new Supermicro hardware I've tried works with Freebsd > 4.10 properly. I've seen that this has been reported by others. > They are all based on the 7520 and 7530 Intel chips. 5.3 works > ok, but a 3.4/800 processor on 5.3 is slower than a 3.06/533 > processor on our old 7502 chipset based system with 4.9. What can > be done? Donate one of the systems to a FreeBSD kernel developer. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:53:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D9B16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:53:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D15843D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:53:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9E4F3533FA; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:53:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:53:29 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bruce Campbell Message-ID: <20050105045329.GA77072@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104221531.GA70844@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104892047.41db508f4c7f4@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1104892047.41db508f4c7f4@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow - traced to getpwnam maybe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:53:06 -0000 --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:27:27PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote: > I wrote a small program: >=20 > #include > #include >=20 > main( int argc, char *argv[] ) > { > getpwuid( 13076 ); > } >=20 > and ran it under truss on 5.x and it generated 178,711 lines of output. > (the bulk of which is those lseek/read calls as above) >=20 > 4.7 (with same master.passwd file) gave 59 lines of output, which seems > normal. >=20 > I'm speculating that imap and sendmail and just about everything use > getpwuid and getpwuid is misbehaving on 5.x especially with a large > master.passwd file. Try tuning the pwd_mkdb parameters (see hash(3)) in /usr/src/usr.sbin/pwd_mkdb/pwd_mkdb.c and recompile: HASHINFO openinfo =3D { 4096, /* bsize */ 32, /* ffactor */ 256, /* nelem */ 2048 * 1024, /* cachesize */ NULL, /* hash() */ 0 /* lorder */ }; e.g. adjust nelem to 12000 to accomodate your significantly-larger-than-average password database. If this helps, please submit a PR requesting that someone make an option to pwd_mkdb to tune this at runtime (or better yet, submit the patch to do this yourself - it's straightforward to modify the source to do this). Kris --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB23LJWry0BWjoQKURAq2jAKDzTm5VM87uxVwm0m0bkyTyEWt0MwCeJ/cM d/v91vEB+Lhs9II6nzo8FOA= =/xcw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:53:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4EF16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:53:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C544A43D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1CAB656437; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:53:30 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:53:30 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Joshua Lokken Message-ID: <20050105045330.GA62042@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <20050103204341.GB26032@xor.obsecurity.org> <86wtutitns.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <41DACF99.50601@taborandtashell.net> <20050104200424.GB33185@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: "cpghost@cordula.ws" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:53:32 -0000 On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:21:17PM -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:04:24 +0100, cpghost@cordula.ws > wrote: [...] > > I've tried to compile openoffice from scratch using the port (it worked > > before), but this time it bombed near the end with a program 'lzip' > > dumping core because it was fed a wrong package list (?). I tried to > > track the problem down, but it was too deeply hidden within the OO > > build process, so I finally gave up and fetched the binary package which > > works perfectly. This was 2 weeks ago; perhaps OO compiles perfectly now? > > It does; at least, it did on Sunday afternoon ;) Not on 5-STABLE it doesn't. The "lzip" build tool crashes a couple of times during the build and the "make install" fails with: /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo $! > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid ./install: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jesus saves. Allah forgives. Cthulu thinks you'd make a nice sandwich. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:54:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503AA16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:54:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaout-m.tc.umn.edu (mtaout-m.tc.umn.edu [160.94.23.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6AE43D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:54:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duns0014@umn.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (ip68-104-63-160.lv.lv.cox.net [68.104.63.160]) by mtaout-m.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:54:04 -0600 (CST) X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] ip68-104-63-160.lv.lv.cox.net [68.104.63.160] #+TS+AU+HN From: Joe Dunsmore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:51:59 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501040851.59496.duns0014@umn.edu> Subject: How to get internet working on installed freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:54:05 -0000 I installed freebsd 5.1 on my computer when it was not connected to any network (but my ethernet card was attached). Now that my computer has a network connection, I can't access any internet sites, it says it can't find the host. I've installed freebsd 5.1 on this same computer when it was connected to a network and the internet worked right away. I also have linux on this computer and it can connect to the internet fine. So my question is how do I get the internet working on freebsd? Is there a simple command I can run or do I edit some text file? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:55:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEB016A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:55:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41501.mail.yahoo.com (web41501.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D37BD43D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:55:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jim0266@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 51149 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2005 04:55:02 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=eLkCP9ZBaCL1/PGsNYw7zK/Ib4k+4iWDg2lPm74yXeJheOwJnEACoB9N6l8C2G+mCivH96kAMUTUBKGzNidUWZiqFAOPlIZ1Ns2ScBRqAsBpryzWn6RJ9Xv4C/uv2ASlKyro5EJFouKcute7KpIVkhLTLyCmQT9UxdMwZAiy6x0= ; Message-ID: <20050105045502.51147.qmail@web41501.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.93.161.48] by web41501.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:55:02 PST Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:55:02 -0800 (PST) From: Jim Arnold To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS (NOT ME)!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:55:03 -0000 >I've hit a wall getting this to work: >?spike# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mDNSResponder.sh start >.: Can't open /etc/rc.subr: No such file or directory I created a symlink to /usr/local/etc/rc.subr from /etc and it now works like a charm! Thanks for posting this. Jim __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:57:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775AD16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:57:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from helium.webpack.hosteurope.de (helium.webpack.hosteurope.de [217.115.142.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1D743D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:57:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@hexren.net) Received: by helium.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.34 using asmtp helo=hexren.steenbuck.net) id 1Cm3F4-000182-A1; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:57:54 +0100 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:57:53 +0100 From: Hexren X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <22139821652.20050105055753@hexren.net> To: Joe Dunsmore In-Reply-To: <200501040851.59496.duns0014@umn.edu> References: <200501040851.59496.duns0014@umn.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to get internet working on installed freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hexren List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:57:57 -0000 JD> I installed freebsd 5.1 on my computer when it was not connected to any JD> network (but my ethernet card was attached). Now that my computer has a JD> network connection, I can't access any internet sites, it says it can't find JD> the host. I've installed freebsd 5.1 on this same computer when it was JD> connected to a network and the internet worked right away. I also have linux JD> on this computer and it can connect to the internet fine. JD> So my question is how do I get the internet working on freebsd? Is there a JD> simple command I can run or do I edit some text file? Thanks. JD> _______________________________________________ --------------------------------------------- How exactly is the Computer connected ? (dsl, cable, isdn) Have you tested simple IP conectivity ? (ping 216.136.204.21 (that is freebsd.org)) If you can ping a host using IP number but not using DNS name how does your /etc/resolv.conf look under FBSD and how does it look under Linux ? Hexren From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 04:59:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17B5216A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:59:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10BE43D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:59:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j054xKj26283 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:59:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:59:20 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050104170920.GD94265@keyslapper.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: SpamAssassin-Milter accuracy... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:59:21 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Louis LeBlanc > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:09 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: SpamAssassin-Milter accuracy... > > > On 01/04/05 05:17 PM, Matthias Buelow sat at the `puter and typed: > > Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > > > > Use with care. Some spam rbls are overly zealous, and often block out > > > whole netblocks just because one IP has been reported as an offender. > > > > And all dialup networks. Which can lead to the bizarre situation that > > if you're relaying through your mail server from a dialup IP, and mail > > goes thru SA, you'll get a high score. There're several ways > to prevent > > this from happening, of course, for example, to run an extra smtpd on a > > nonstandard port that doesn't push mails through SpamAssassin, or just > > to disable the damn RBL stuff in the SA config (I did both, greylisting > > is more effective than the suspicious RBL stuff anyways). > > This includes most dynamically allocated IP blocks. The only way to > avoid getting tagged and/or outright rejected by some networks is to > relay through the ISPs relay. > > It's because of this that I don't use the spamblock RBLs at the MTA > level. SA works almost perfectly with it's own clearing house checks > (NJABL, SORBS, SPAMCOP, etc.) and modifies the score for each. I've > dug up some recipes that will further compound scores for multiple of > these clearing houses too, so you get bonus points for getting > reported to 3 or more :) > The only problem with doing this is that you have to completely receive the e-mail message before SA can check it against the blacklists. We do the blacklist checks at the MTA level and turn them off in SA. As a result the e-mail is never accepted by the server if it's in a blacklist. As a result of that if the spam is coming from a compromised mailserver then that mailserver will just requeue the message. And with everyone on the Internet doing this, it will make the compromised mailserver melt down immediately, which will punish the admin of it for running an open mailserver in the first place. > I do use the blackholes (check http://blackholes.us) at the MTA, since > rejecting mail outright from Asian (and a few African) countries has > reduced my spam intake by about 80%, without reducing my legitimate > mail by a single message. Since I'm not running a service for other > people, and I carefully choose the blackhole domains I use, it's not a > problem for me. Of course, that may not be an option for you. > Someday I'll stop this practice, but for now some of my doors are just > plain closed. > We don't use blackholes.us although I'll take a look at it. About 50% of our incoming spam is blocked by the blacklist servers we do use. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 05:03:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A488116A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:03:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galilee.polands.org (CPE-24-208-53-189.new.rr.com [24.208.53.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B064743D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from jericho.polands.org (jericho.polands.org [172.16.1.35]) by galilee.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0553BRZ099643; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:03:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from jericho.polands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jericho.polands.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0553BHt044158; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:03:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from djp@jericho.polands.org) Received: (from djp@localhost) by jericho.polands.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0553BEq044157; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:03:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from djp) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:03:11 -0600 From: Doug Poland To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20050105050310.GA43850@polands.org> References: <20050105033712.GA43732@polands.org> <20050105041712.GA18285@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050105041712.GA18285@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ultra Speed CD-RW media and cdrecord X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:03:14 -0000 On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:17:12PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 04), Doug Poland said: > > My son gave me a package of Memorex Ultra Speed CD-RW blanks for > > Christmas. I was going to burn an ISO on my 5.3-STABLE system but > > ran into a brick wall. > > > > cdrecord tells me that it's "Trying to use ultra high speed medium on > > improper writer." I've used "MultiSpeed 1x2x4x" media and "1x-4x > > Compatible" media in the past with no problems. > > From a quick scan of the cdrecord source and some searches, it looks > like Ultra Speed media require write speeds of 16x or faster, but your > 2100S can only write CD-RW media at 10x (it can do CD-R's at 16x). You > can use the -force flag to make cdrecord write to the disks, but no > guarantees. It'd be nice if cdrecrd's error message printed the limits > of drive and media instead of just saying that something's "improper" :) > Thanks for the help. I tried the -force switch and got lots of errors and the disk didn't burn. On a positive note, I suppose it's time for a new CD writer! -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 05:11:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F83D16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:11:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A091F43D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:11:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j055Alj26339; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:10:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Ramiro Aceves" Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:10:46 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <41DA66CE.2070701@wanadoo.es> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: S Salamander cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Epson Stylus C84 printer setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:11:01 -0000 Have you heard of the KISS principle? CUPS is unnecessary. unnecessary software complicates the machine and makes it harder to troubleshoot. I don't personally care much for this. Also, too many people out there have got the idea that CUPS is somehow required to make their printer work. Not good. This leads to less understanding of how things work. This is a personal taste thing. Some people like to buy cars that have a factory cd player/dvd player/drink cooler/hand washer/ power windows/power door locks/factory alarm/antitheft key/remote starter/extra fog lights/spoilers that do nothing at any legal speed/ gps systems/onstar systems/etc. etc. etc. Others like to buy cars with a minimal set of things that go a lot faster because they aren't loaded down with all the extra unnecessary baloney, and don't cost as much to repair because all the extra crap isn't breaking down all the time. It is the same with computers. I know of people who have Windows boxes that are so highly configured it takes them literally weeks to put backgrounds/sounds/games/doodads/etc.etc. on every little thing of their PC. To me it is sad to see this same attitude encroaching on FreeBSD. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: Ramiro Aceves [mailto:ea1abz@wanadoo.es] > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 1:50 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: S Salamander; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Epson Stylus C84 printer setup > > > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > Why in heavens name are you bothering with CUPS? > > Hello Ted and people there. > > I have working my Epson C84 in FreeBSD 5.3 perfectly with CUPS and gimp > -print. > > Just curious. ¿What is the matter with CUPS?. I do not understand well > what "GPL-crutch" means. I seems that you hate CUPS. My english is not > good. Please explain it to me. > > Thanks. > > Ramiro. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 05:13:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52CCD16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:13:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F2043D39 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:13:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hunreal@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so99290wri for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:13:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AioGpMQhcujpsx257mOGrJaHaOWrB0EhleLa97x2HbzrBhyo8PXOwu2aVNYFz4JA0XfM9rlj81VnArSjrkLKUvIOGTIkBygD8RjXJh4Em9McK39vVok61J7Ssjlo7i66reMox4ENc1mLMpXvyGqjXHIq/zNMgTBwq6u/uDBi/oA= Received: by 10.54.2.62 with SMTP id 62mr319177wrb; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:13:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.3.16 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:13:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9b6b59500501042113452715b1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:13:18 +0800 From: Unreal HSHH To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Howto check the hard disk bad sectors in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Unreal HSHH List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:13:19 -0000 Hi, I have one harddisk installed in FreeBSD. And I want to check if any bad sectors on it. How can I do ? It seems the fsck can't do this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 05:19:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CE516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:19:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3445043D53 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:19:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j055Jlj26395; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:19:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Unreal HSHH" , Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:19:47 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <9b6b59500501042113452715b1@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Howto check the hard disk bad sectors in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:19:50 -0000 Basically impossible. Your best bet is to go to the hard drive manufacturers website and see if they have a software program (often a DOS program) that you can boot off a floppy and do this to the hard drive. Or, if it's a SCSI disk you can often run a manufacturers program under DOS that talks to the SCSI card and will send the commands to the SCSI disk. Years ago with the old wd disk driver you could run bad144 and do this to ESDI and MFM drives. If you want to stress-test a hard disk then install and run one of the disk stressing programs in the ports collection. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Unreal HSHH > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:13 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Howto check the hard disk bad sectors in FreeBSD? > > > Hi, > > I have one harddisk installed in FreeBSD. > And I want to check if any bad sectors on it. > How can I do ? It seems the fsck can't do this. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 06:00:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A2716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:00:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaout-m.tc.umn.edu (mtaout-m.tc.umn.edu [160.94.23.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CB043D49 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:00:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duns0014@umn.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (ip68-104-63-160.lv.lv.cox.net [68.104.63.160]) by mtaout-m.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:00:25 -0600 (CST) X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] ip68-104-63-160.lv.lv.cox.net [68.104.63.160] #+TS+AU+HN From: Joe Dunsmore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:58:20 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200501040851.59496.duns0014@umn.edu> <22139821652.20050105055753@hexren.net> In-Reply-To: <22139821652.20050105055753@hexren.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501040958.21176.duns0014@umn.edu> Subject: Re: How to get internet working on installed freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:00:26 -0000 On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 04:57 am, Hexren wrote: > JD> I installed freebsd 5.1 on my computer when it was not connected to any > JD> network (but my ethernet card was attached). Now that my computer has > a JD> network connection, I can't access any internet sites, it says it > can't find JD> the host. I've installed freebsd 5.1 on this same computer > when it was JD> connected to a network and the internet worked right away. > I also have linux JD> on this computer and it can connect to the internet > fine. > > JD> So my question is how do I get the internet working on freebsd? Is > there a JD> simple command I can run or do I edit some text file? Thanks. > JD> _______________________________________________ > > --------------------------------------------- > > How exactly is the Computer connected ? (dsl, cable, isdn) Cable, with a router and modem in between. > Have you tested simple IP conectivity ? (ping 216.136.204.21 (that is > freebsd.org)) It said there was no route to host. > If you can ping a host using IP number but not using DNS name how does > your /etc/resolv.conf look under FBSD and how does it look under Linux > ? Under debian, resolv.conf says: search nameserver 192.168.1.1 this file does not exist under freebsd. I created one with the same info as the linux one and even after reboot, it did not help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 06:07:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D154516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:07:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from helium.webpack.hosteurope.de (helium.webpack.hosteurope.de [217.115.142.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E0343D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:07:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@hexren.net) Received: by helium.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.34 using asmtp helo=hexren.steenbuck.net) id 1Cm4KN-0001d9-HE; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:07:28 +0100 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:07:26 +0100 From: Hexren X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <69143995314.20050105070726@hexren.net> To: Joe Dunsmore In-Reply-To: <200501040958.21176.duns0014@umn.edu> References: <200501040851.59496.duns0014@umn.edu> <22139821652.20050105055753@hexren.net> <200501040958.21176.duns0014@umn.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: How to get internet working on installed freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hexren List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:07:29 -0000 JD> On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 04:57 am, Hexren wrote: >> JD> I installed freebsd 5.1 on my computer when it was not connected to any >> JD> network (but my ethernet card was attached). Now that my computer has >> a JD> network connection, I can't access any internet sites, it says it >> can't find JD> the host. I've installed freebsd 5.1 on this same computer >> when it was JD> connected to a network and the internet worked right away. >> I also have linux JD> on this computer and it can connect to the internet >> fine. >> >> JD> So my question is how do I get the internet working on freebsd? Is >> there a JD> simple command I can run or do I edit some text file? Thanks. >> JD> _______________________________________________ >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> >> How exactly is the Computer connected ? (dsl, cable, isdn) JD> Cable, with a router and modem in between. >> Have you tested simple IP conectivity ? (ping 216.136.204.21 (that is >> freebsd.org)) JD> It said there was no route to host. >> If you can ping a host using IP number but not using DNS name how does >> your /etc/resolv.conf look under FBSD and how does it look under Linux >> ? JD> Under debian, resolv.conf says: JD> search JD> nameserver 192.168.1.1 JD> this file does not exist under freebsd. I created one with the same info as JD> the linux one and even after reboot, it did not help. JD> _______________________________________________ --------------------------------------------- What ip adresses are used by the router, the debian install and the FBSD install, how do the routing tables under debian and FBSD look like ? (netstat -nr) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 06:22:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFA216A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:22:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4959843D39; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:22:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id C600385679; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:52:43 +1030 (CST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:52:43 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: FreeBSD mobile Mailing List , FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+nG9yj4eE4W6Oba0" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Subject: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:22:47 -0000 --+nG9yj4eE4W6Oba0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal wireless card to work? Greg --=20 See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --+nG9yj4eE4W6Oba0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB24ezIubykFB6QiMRAj2YAJ0ebNRO8V/1NO9mbm6qDsIRPWJu0wCaA84E 0vtWrL5EYo78ToNP6j1JH50= =9jG8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+nG9yj4eE4W6Oba0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 06:25:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A468A16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:25:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from boss.evilbofh.com (1-1-3-35a.ens.sth.bostream.se [82.182.65.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3153643D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from felipe@garcia-lind.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boss.evilbofh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD3E11ADA2; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:25:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from boss.evilbofh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cubicle.evilbofh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66487-01; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:24:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (livingroom.i.evilbofh.com [10.0.0.5]) by boss.evilbofh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C6411ADA1; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:24:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DB88D8.7050508@garcia-lind.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:27:36 +0100 From: Felipe Garcia User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <41D9676F.7060707@garcia-lind.com> <44sm5gudn9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44sm5gudn9.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at example.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with fsck and 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:25:05 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: it was a standrad 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE on i386.. I gave up recreated the fs and restored from backup... /f >Felipe Garcia writes: > > > >>fsck fails, is there any way to save this fs.. force it to be marked >>ok or is there a fix for fsck (tired with the lastest version out of >>cvs does the same) >> >> >>** /dev/amrd1e (NO WRITE) >>** Last Mounted on /usr/local/media >>** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes >>INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=6526350 (180224 should be 113760) >>CORRECT? no >> >>INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=6526354 (83552 should be 65984) >>CORRECT? no >> >>INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=6526356 (81504 should be 65984) >>CORRECT? no >> >>fsck_ffs: cannot alloc 3400404768 bytes for inoinfo >> >> > >That's a huge amount of memory, all right. A quick look at the code >makes me think that it might be a word-size error; are you running on >a 64-bit platform by any chance? > >This is probably worth a PR, and definitely worth a message to the >filesystem experts. > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 06:30:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461CD16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:30:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mattvirushome.dynu.com (h139-055-210-152.adsl.navix.net [139.55.210.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2792843D4C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:30:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mattvirus@navix.net) Received: from [192.168.254.17] ([192.168.254.17])j056UWEV076756; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:30:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mattvirus@navix.net) Message-ID: <41DB8979.1080104@navix.net> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:30:17 -0600 From: matt virus User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Dunsmore , freebsd References: <200501040851.59496.duns0014@umn.edu> In-Reply-To: <200501040851.59496.duns0014@umn.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How to get internet working on installed freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:30:36 -0000 Joe Dunsmore wrote: > I installed freebsd 5.1 on my computer when it was not connected to any > network (but my ethernet card was attached). Now that my computer has a > network connection, I can't access any internet sites, it says it can't find > the host. I've installed freebsd 5.1 on this same computer when it was > connected to a network and the internet worked right away. I also have linux > on this computer and it can connect to the internet fine. > > So my question is how do I get the internet working on freebsd? Is there a > simple command I can run or do I edit some text file? Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > i would simply suggest running /stand/sysinstall --then do the configure option --then do the networking option --then pick interfaces option --then pick your network card --it will ask you if you'd like to try dhcp - i'd suggest you do that method. It should pull the proper settings from your router and off to the races you go -matt -- Matt Virus ("veer-iss") http://www.mattvirus.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 06:35:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FD316A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:35:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from webserver.coremega.com (h-68-165-95-178.nycmny83.covad.net [68.165.95.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB7C43D39 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:35:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from links@megacameras.com) Received: from webserver ([68.165.95.179]) by webserver.coremega.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:36:49 -0500 From: "Marc Larry" To: "Freebsd Questions" Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:36:49 -0500 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2005 06:36:49.0984 (UTC) FILETIME=[EFA4BC00:01C4F2F0] Subject: Lets Exchange Links. megacameras.com now links to freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:35:53 -0000 I have just added a link to freebsd.org on our new site megacameras.com. Your link is located in our "Hunting" category section. If you want us to keep this link up, please also add megacameras.com to your links page. Your site will be included into our links and we will post it on all of our sites as soon as you have a reciprical link pointing back to megacameras.com. Title: Megacameras - Discount digital cameras, digital camcorders, comparisons, latest reviews and news Description: Get the best prices, and the latest news on the hottest and newest digital cameras, digital camcorders and accessories. Newest technology news, reviews on digital cameras and camcorders in our online store. Link: http://www.megacameras.com/ Banner: http://www.megacameras.com/banners/mega_banner.gif ***If you want to place your banner on our site please email your banner to us and also the link location to where our link is placed on your site. If you have any other websites that you would want us to link to please post our link on all of your sites and send them to me anytime and I will add them to our links pages on all of our sites. We are a web marketing company and have a lot of websites so it will take some time to add them all if it is a lot. Also we have to review all your links so it might take some time to add them all to all of our sites and put them in the right categories. You can also manually add your site here if you feel it is taking too long. http://www.megacameras.com/links/addlink.php Thank you for exchanging links with us. Marc Lary links@megacameras.com megacameras.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 06:39:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF3A16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:39:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (mx.tele-kom.ru [213.80.148.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E72A43D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:39:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 4510 invoked by uid 555); 5 Jan 2005 06:43:58 -0000 Received: from shark (213.80.148.252) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1104907435-4484 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, Jan 5 09:43:55 2005 +0300 (MSK) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 783E59DB55; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:38:23 +0300 (MSK) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:38:22 +0300 From: Sergey Zaharchenko To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20050105063822.GA1933@shark.localdomain> References: <20050104100639.6f01c87a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050104100639.6f01c87a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Listening-To: Silence cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Someone trying to break in. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:39:09 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:06:39AM -0500, Bill Moran probably wrote: >=20 > Over the holiday I replaced a server that appeared to have been cracked. > Basically built a replacement with the same services in a sandbox, then > swapped it with the old one. >=20 > The new server seems to be secure, as we're not seeing the spam coming > off it that the old one was generating, however, I'm seeing a lot of > messages in the log files. For example: >=20 > Jan 4 07:15:13 mail su: _secure_path: cannot stat /usr/sbin/nologin/.log= in_conf: Not a directory It looks like `/usr/sbin/nologin/' is someone's ``home directory'' and that someone is trying to su. /usr/sbin/nologin can't be a home directory, it must be the shell for some user who isn't supposed to log in. /nonexistent should be the home directory. It looks possible that your password file specifies /usr/sbin/nologin as a home directory and a valid shell for some system user. Maybe you omitted or added an extra `:'? Just a guess, --=20 DoubleF Dealing with failure is easy: work hard to improve. Success is also easy to handle: you've solved the wrong problem. Work hard to improve. --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB24tdwo7hT/9lVdwRAtHgAJ4pnVIse+kRsdEhonbWodCCevP7SgCfbAGd m6xDvokA5vijTo8DfIwoyWE= =FolH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 06:50:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C3D16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:50:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (cs.earlham.edu [159.28.230.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710AF43D49 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:50:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (CPE-67-48-232-40.new.rr.com [67.48.232.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j056oeMf032928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:50:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Message-ID: <41DB8E4E.4040403@cs.earlham.edu> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:50:54 -0600 From: Skylar Thompson Organization: Earlham College Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFD5C673D8737AE29C6B4C960" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on quark.cs.earlham.edu X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: skylar@cs.earlham.edu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Privoxy at boot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: skylar@cs.earlham.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 06:50:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFD5C673D8737AE29C6B4C960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Adam wrote: >I installed Privoxy and it seems to run nicely but I have installed it >many times before (not because it didn't install, but because the >machine was insane.) but anyway, I for some reason have never been >able to find out how to make it start up at boot. I tried /etc/rc.conf >but no luck. I tried Google and still no luck. > Try adding it to /etc/rc.local. That's how I start it up on my FreeBSD box. -- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ --------------enigFD5C673D8737AE29C6B4C960 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB245Psc4yyULgN4YRAvVPAKCUXn4W0yTXF3yYGtEX+1AXOre4CQCffngz /nyEpNjtlvpwcxQVAmQkj9k= =Cw3L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFD5C673D8737AE29C6B4C960-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 07:28:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8608C16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:28:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kraid.nerim.net (smtp-103-wednesday.nerim.net [62.4.16.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227A943D49 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:28:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sparrox@free.fr) Received: from mail.planete-linux.net (fandres.net1.nerim.net [62.212.118.132]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB95841B19; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:28:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.planete-linux.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 222BB73674; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:28:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from 217.169.133.249 ([217.169.133.249]) by www.planete-linux.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:28:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1104910081.41db970107486@www.planete-linux.net> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:28:01 +0100 From: Frederic Andres To: FreeBSD Questions References: <059701c4f222$d7064a20$152ea8c0@killer> In-Reply-To: <059701c4f222$d7064a20$152ea8c0@killer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 217.169.133.249 cc: Justin England Subject: Re: 3ware Esclade 7006-2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:28:02 -0000 Hi, > My question is mainly on the driver though. Which should I use? > The twe driver seems to be working as far as I have tested, but do > I need the driver downloaded from 3ware to get 3dm2 and the CLI to > work? If so, what is the best way to install the driver as I am > using this array as the boot disk? I have the same 3ware controller running on FreeBSD 5.2/5.2.1 and it works very well. I use the default drivers (twe) during the installation of FreeBSD. Concerning the admin tools, I installed the port /usr/ports/sysutils/3dm which provides an alert daemon and a web interface to check hardward. In addition, I downloaded the command line tool from 3ware website : the cli program, version 7.7.1 for FreeBSD 4.8 Beta. (it works on FreeBSD 5.2.x serie and should work on 5.3.x). I hope that it will help you, Fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 07:34:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B502A16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:34:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51005.mail.yahoo.com (web51005.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C8BA43D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fasi_74@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 6707 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2005 07:34:13 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=jOoC9stStLYLyDQsbJYYG112aAWlZTSw6cc+3dpIwgdWRIH639xLj+S49X0SWjPXFuX22ke/86/9zqhiOYR0UD0oKZhp3sHFbrXe/3z7FnL1P2Kgcg2pWT90plld3DXW8sPZUYadq7nJXWCdfjC30IxAOp0dMscMp7/T0zm1Hgk= ; Message-ID: <20050105073413.6705.qmail@web51005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.147.160.231] by web51005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:34:13 PST Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 23:34:13 -0800 (PST) From: faisal gillani To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41DB8979.1080104@navix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: block ip & MAC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:34:17 -0000 can u tell me how to block ip address or mac address in freebsd or should i cay ip filter ? thanks ===== *º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 07:36:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B8316A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:36:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC7343D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:36:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cristian.salan@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so213297wri for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:36:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cCd55iqilWa4CK3/Fpvy5mFZpSsAWR5YhMcO0dOD2zZaf6PYQTJ+CjVhP/9Hds8/CCaCiDDJgc9AODfdVyUnAzeMQ6YGKlQHrbnzrZXnS0S1fJ9bCMsKSzzVYkVxFAxFX4q2vSdTySYXjT73/a3ZDQq+n8XkJfHGFeJRtYouVHg= Received: by 10.54.52.3 with SMTP id z3mr312443wrz; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?83.103.130.10? ([83.103.130.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id d7sm155776wra.2005.01.04.23.36.53; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:36:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41DB98A2.1040207@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:34:58 +0200 From: Cristian Salan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pachiu cosmin References: <20050104183833.3971.qmail@web52207.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050104183833.3971.qmail@web52207.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wap question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:36:55 -0000 Hi, Try this link http://www.beholdlearning.com/wwwservices/wap.html Cristian Salan pachiu cosmin wrote: >Hi, > >I'm making mobile phone software and I need to put >them on wap. Do you know if I can make my own WAP >server or if there exists an software that can help >me. I have an public IP and I have an server on >FreeBSD 4.9. > >Please help me. > >Best wishes, Cosmin Pachiu, Romania > > > >__________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. >http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 07:55:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA8A16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:55:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E6A43D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:55:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6C2C256437; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:55:42 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:55:42 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Joe Dunsmore Message-ID: <20050105075542.GA63156@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <200501040851.59496.duns0014@umn.edu> <22139821652.20050105055753@hexren.net> <200501040958.21176.duns0014@umn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501040958.21176.duns0014@umn.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to get internet working on installed freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:55:44 -0000 On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:58:20AM +0000, Joe Dunsmore wrote: > On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 04:57 am, Hexren wrote: > > JD> I installed freebsd 5.1 on my computer when it was not connected to any > > JD> network (but my ethernet card was attached). Now that my computer has > > a JD> network connection, I can't access any internet sites, it says it > > can't find JD> the host. I've installed freebsd 5.1 on this same computer > > when it was JD> connected to a network and the internet worked right away. > > I also have linux JD> on this computer and it can connect to the internet > > fine. > > > > JD> So my question is how do I get the internet working on freebsd? Is > > there a JD> simple command I can run or do I edit some text file? Thanks. > > JD> _______________________________________________ > > > > --------------------------------------------- > > > > How exactly is the Computer connected ? (dsl, cable, isdn) > > Cable, with a router and modem in between. > > > Have you tested simple IP conectivity ? (ping 216.136.204.21 (that is > > freebsd.org)) > > It said there was no route to host. > Sounds like you've forgotten to put the following in your /etc/rc.conf: defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" If your Linux setup "automagically" works, then I suspect that your router is running DHCP. You can also set up FreeBSD to use DHCP with a ifconfig_xxx setting in /etc/rc.conf. Check out rc.conf(5) for more details. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "If everything's under control, you're going too slow" - Mario Andretti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 08:47:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148C716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:47:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A8243D45 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:47:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [IPv6???1] (localhost.daemonsecurity.com [127.0.0.1]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21232FD049 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:47:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DBA993.6060509@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:47:15 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: NFS/diskless: mount/unmount problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:47:26 -0000 Hi, I am trying to setup diskless workstations. I have got to the point where I can boot up the workstations, the nfs_root is mounted correctly read only. I have two problems with NFS: 1) The problem is mounting /var rw. I want to use an nfs mount to let data be persistent and since I don't have too much ram. If I nfs mount /var I get the following error: "unable to update /var/db/mounttab" This happens because mount tries to update the file before mounting the filesystem, and hence tries to write to the file on the root partition which is read-only. Mounting root in rw would probably remove the error, but it's not the desireable solution since mounttab become unavailable after the mount, and it adds the risk of inconsistencies on the root share. How, do I correct this error? Should I simply ignore? After the mount, things seems to work ok. 2) After mounting the /var and /home, I try to start up X. So far little luck, I need to configure X, but that's another story. The problem is on shutdown, the client fails to sync the disks before unmounting the nfs-partitions, it prints a secuence of non-zero digits untill giving up. I don't know if this too can be silently ignored. Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 08:59:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A47716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:59:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaout-w.tc.umn.edu (mtaout-w.tc.umn.edu [160.94.160.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B2F43D48 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duns0014@umn.edu) Received: from 192.168.1.14 (ip68-104-63-160.lv.lv.cox.net [68.104.63.160] (may be forged)) by mtaout-w.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:59:55 -0600 (CST) X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] ip68-104-63-160.lv.lv.cox.net [68.104.63.160] #+HF+TS+AU From: Joe Dunsmore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:57:51 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501041257.51097.duns0014@umn.edu> Subject: How to get internet working on installed freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:59:56 -0000 > i would simply suggest running /stand/sysinstall that worked, thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 09:56:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CEA16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:56:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E04B43D45 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:56:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 22867 invoked by uid 513); 5 Jan 2005 09:56:26 -0000 Received: from 213.146.114.24 by dsl-mail (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.24 (clamdscan: 0.80/609. spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:1(213.146.114.24):SA:0(2.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.36132 secs); 05 Jan 2005 09:56:26 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Level: ++ Received: from reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 09:56:26 -0000 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:58:28 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: <20050104100639.6f01c87a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Message-ID: <20050105105340.C98674@pukruppa.net> References: <20050104100639.6f01c87a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Someone trying to break in. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:56:27 -0000 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Bill Moran wrote: > > Over the holiday I replaced a server that appeared to have been > cracked. Basically built a replacement with the same services > in a sandbox, then swapped it with the old one. > > The new server seems to be secure, as we're not seeing the spam > coming off it that the old one was generating, however, I'm > seeing a lot of messages in the log files. For example: > > Jan 4 07:15:13 mail su: _secure_path: cannot stat > /usr/sbin/nologin/.login_conf: Not a directory Jan 4 07:15:13 > mail su: _secure_path: cannot stat > /usr/sbin/nologin/.login_conf: Not a directory Perhaps you just mixed up some (pseudo-)user's entry for /etc/master.passwd ? Instead of ...:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin you set ...:/sbin/nologin:/nonexistent ??? Just a guess, Uli. > > On the one hand, I'm taking this to mean that whatever > technique was previously being used to control the box is no > longer working, but I'm wondering if anyone has an idea as to > what the technique actually was? I want to see if I can lock it > down even further, based on the specific exploit that is being > attempted here. > > Anyone seen these errors before, and have any clue as to what > exploit is going on? The previous machine was very outdated, > so I'm assuming it was a known exploit in the mail system > (postfix) or Neomail or something else. The new machine has > all the latest stable versions of all software, so I'm hoping > that it's no longer vulnerable, but I can't seem to determine > what kind of attack was being used. > > Thoughts? > > -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 10:07:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C6B16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:07:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asmtp01.eresmas.com (asmtp05.eresmas.com [62.81.235.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F4243D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:07:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ea1abz@wanadoo.es) Received: from [192.168.108.54] (helo=mx01.eresmas.com) by asmtp01.eresmas.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cm84S-0002Bx-CK; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:07:16 +0100 Received: from [80.103.56.213] (helo=[80.103.56.213]) by mx01.eresmas.com with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Cm84R-0003bG-AW; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:07:16 +0100 Message-ID: <41DBBBF4.3090605@wanadoo.es> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:05:40 +0100 From: Ramiro Aceves User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) cc: S Salamander cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Epson Stylus C84 printer setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:07:20 -0000 Hello Ted Many thanks for your response. Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Have you heard of the KISS principle? no :-( > > CUPS is unnecessary. unnecessary software complicates the machine > and makes it harder to troubleshoot. I don't personally care much > for this. I understand now. I agree with you. When I was in Linux, I first used "apsfilter" and "lprng". Then, I read somewhere that CUPS was the new thing and lpr was an obsolete thing and I switched. I accept that cups is very easy to configure, but you are right, I have lost the control of the machine. > > Also, too many people out there have got the idea that CUPS is > somehow required to make their printer work. Not good. This > leads to less understanding of how things work. I completely agree with you. The problem is when a user has no idea how to configure a printer and has to choose among making some clics on a WEB interface or reading several manual pages without understanding a word. > > This is a personal taste thing. Some people like to buy cars > that have a factory cd player/dvd player/drink cooler/hand washer/ > power windows/power door locks/factory alarm/antitheft key/remote > starter/extra fog lights/spoilers that do nothing at any legal speed/ > gps systems/onstar systems/etc. etc. etc. > > Others like to buy cars with a minimal set of things that go a > lot faster because they aren't loaded down with all the extra > unnecessary baloney, and don't cost as much to repair because all > the extra crap isn't breaking down all the time. I agree again, I personally prefer keeping thisng as simple as I can. But in this case I have succumbed with the easy thing. > > It is the same with computers. I know of people who have > Windows boxes that are so highly configured it takes them > literally weeks to put backgrounds/sounds/games/doodads/etc.etc. > on every little thing of their PC. To me it is sad to see > this same attitude encroaching on FreeBSD. Thanks dear Ted, your post has made me think twice. I am going to study the manual and try to configure the printer as you explained. I seems to be easy and SIMPLE. Thank you. Ramiro. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 10:12:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C6116A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:12:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from male.aldigital.co.uk (male.thebunker.net [213.129.64.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D6D43D53 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:12:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by male.aldigital.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FD39781A; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:12:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])j05ACPW0035550; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:12:27 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <41DBBD82.2020101@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:12:18 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Pazarena References: <41DB0452.2070005@ccstores.com> In-Reply-To: <41DB0452.2070005@ccstores.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF8E9EE0C4F93FEF6F3060F98" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: phpMyAdmin on 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:12:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF8E9EE0C4F93FEF6F3060F98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim Pazarena wrote: > phpMyAdmin is "marked as broken" on my 5.3 release. > > has it since been fixed? (I've never tried cvsup, but > will if it will help me with phpMyAdmin). Yes, it has been fixed, thank you very much. Update your ports tree using cvsup to get the fixes. You can look here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/databases/phpmyadmin/ or here: http://www.freshports.org/databases/phpmyadmin/ to see the current status of the port. phpMyAdmin has not been 'marked as broken' since I've been maintaining it. However it has had a whole series of security alerts come out against it in recent months, each of which have required the phpMyAdmin team to make a corresponding series of point releases. The phpMyAdmin port is usually updated within a few days of the upstream update coming out. Don't confuse 'BROKEN', which has a specific meaning in ports Makefiles with the effects of portaudit(1). That, if you've got it installed, will prevent you from installing a port version with known vulnerabilities unless you jump through the right hoops. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 8 Dane Court Manor School Rd PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Tilmanstone Tel: +44 1304 617253 Kent, CT14 0JL UK --------------enigF8E9EE0C4F93FEF6F3060F98 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQdu9iJr7OpndfbmCAQKZ1AQAx5ZpZl+V80qckMSquodW7nJMizYifNR/ uOo2OCosnCFrxOdIC0KI667HDUn6jscKkqJuOZuOHRO77MtmD4UrUGgdQYZ+rbWw 2qCHaTYHlfgPp3UqXXhPNuZA0tqmosGWPvTxnXini2FZsxqXoIH26vIvDvKV9QQ7 w7R57sQ5y1Q= =/2xQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF8E9EE0C4F93FEF6F3060F98-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 10:20:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5871B16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:20:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4147143D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:20:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [192.168.100.1]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81CB7357A8; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:20:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:20:31 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Message-Id: <20050105112031.54f063f9.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: References: <41DA66CE.2070701@wanadoo.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.99-gtk2-20041024 (GTK+ 2.4.14; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__5_Jan_2005_11_20_31_+0100_gq+UCMoxPeDrZUSu" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Epson Stylus C84 printer setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:20:47 -0000 --Signature=_Wed__5_Jan_2005_11_20_31_+0100_gq+UCMoxPeDrZUSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:10:46 -0800 "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: Hi, A bit OT but wanted to throw my $0.02 anyway... > CUPS is unnecessary. unnecessary software complicates the machine > and makes it harder to troubleshoot. I don't personally care much > for this. I don't understand where all this animosity against CUPS comes from, but it's not the first time I've seen people flaming against it. If you don't like it, don't use it. CUPS is very easy to troubleshoot, perhaps you didn't bother reading the man pages. Enable debugging log mode and read the logs, all the info is there. Setting up my USB laserprinter takes 10 seconds with CUPS. Drop the ppd file, point the browser at localhost:631 and configure the printer. Done. The computer is a tool to get the job done, and most people have better things to do than spend more time than needed setting up their printer. It's also worth mentioning that Samba 3.x and CUPS integreate seamlessly. > Also, too many people out there have got the idea that CUPS is > somehow required to make their printer work. Not good. This > leads to less understanding of how things work. That's not true. Don't assume that someone who uses CUPS doesn't know what's going on. > It is the same with computers. I know of people who have > Windows boxes that are so highly configured it takes them > literally weeks to put backgrounds/sounds/games/doodads/etc.etc. > on every little thing of their PC. To me it is sad to see > this same attitude encroaching on FreeBSD. Flawed analogy :-) And, for the nth time, please, don't top post. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez | lea gfx_lib(pc),a1 http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org | moveq #0,d0 PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 | move.l 4.w,a6 I reject all mail from hosts that use SORBS | jsr -552(a6) --Signature=_Wed__5_Jan_2005_11_20_31_+0100_gq+UCMoxPeDrZUSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB279ynLctrNyFFPERAggXAJ40W2k3qrxxFWlD3r8uQVBrLbiGbACgpOGr hNNDgKWWh4VBVjIphi1o2i8= =fT/c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__5_Jan_2005_11_20_31_+0100_gq+UCMoxPeDrZUSu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 10:24:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CE416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:24:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from male.aldigital.co.uk (male.thebunker.net [213.129.64.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF0643D55 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:23:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by male.aldigital.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6056C977F0; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:23:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])j05ANvn4041291; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:23:58 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <41DBC036.3000205@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:23:50 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olof Andersson References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC5660B713983823A7E9AA841" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make install clean question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:24:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC5660B713983823A7E9AA841 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Olof Andersson wrote: > I'm a newbie with a problem. I tried to install phpmyadmin from the > ports. When I ran the make install clean for the first time I got a > screen where I could make a couple of choices. I chose to install with > something called "mysqli". The make install process stopped and I got > this message: > > anderssons1# make install clean > > You may use the following additional build option: > > WITH_SUPHP=yes Install appropriately for use with > the www/suphp port [default: no] > > Unknown extension mysqli. > *** Error code 1 That can only happen if you try and install mysqli with PHP4 --- the mysqli module (which stands for 'MySQL Improved') is a PHP5 only thing. As the OPTIONS dialog does tell you. You need to run: make config to redo the OPTIONS stuff. See the ports(7) man page for details. > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin. > > I tried to run the make install clean again to be able to not select > the "mysqli" but I only get the same message again. I tried to find > information on how to "reset" the install but did not succeed. I have > FreeBSD 5.3. > > Can someone help me? Thanks in advance. That would be me. In general, the port Maintainer is your first point of contact if you're having difficulty with a port. You can find out the Maintainer's e-mail address by: make -V MAINTAINER from the port directory, or most of the time, just by reading the Makefile. Failing that, ask on freebsd-ports@... or even on this list. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 8 Dane Court Manor School Rd PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Tilmanstone Tel: +44 1304 617253 Kent, CT14 0JL UK --------------enigC5660B713983823A7E9AA841 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQdvAPZr7OpndfbmCAQIJ0AQAqKKZVnpkKivjwN7WAobs4bsWSZT6SuUx oVhOtT5aaZEfDYUPlFeEGJhWGMnFTr0/vpD/l2k7bFlJ4RRv51s3xoWCf67GLSgd 0x16VI2cRiWA7Olwk13iwOa6HZAbhHvTSst67/oYDGuNFCc/YMi0UU2nsKRpsUcm QVwk/f53sOI= =eyyQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC5660B713983823A7E9AA841-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 10:25:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E8416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:25:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9665943D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:25:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j05APpj27770; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:25:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Ramiro Aceves" Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:25:51 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <41DBBBF4.3090605@wanadoo.es> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: S Salamander cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Epson Stylus C84 printer setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:25:56 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ramiro Aceves > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 2:06 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: S Salamander; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Epson Stylus C84 printer setup > > > Hello Ted > > Many thanks for your response. > > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > Have you heard of the KISS principle? > > no :-( > KISS = Keep It Simple & Stupid > > > > CUPS is unnecessary. unnecessary software complicates the machine > > and makes it harder to troubleshoot. I don't personally care much > > for this. > > > I understand now. I agree with you. When I was in Linux, I first used > "apsfilter" and "lprng". Then, I read somewhere that CUPS was the new > thing and lpr was an obsolete thing and I switched. I accept that cups > is very easy to configure, but you are right, I have lost the control of > the machine. > > > > > Also, too many people out there have got the idea that CUPS is > > somehow required to make their printer work. Not good. This > > leads to less understanding of how things work. > > > I completely agree with you. The problem is when a user has no idea how > to configure a printer and has to choose among making some clics on a > WEB interface or reading several manual pages without > understanding a word. > No, the problem is when a user blindly installs a web interface that they don't understand in order to make some clicks and the web interface doesen't work. I don't knock web interfaces per-se I use them a lot at work for many systems. But no admin that works under me only knows how to configure these systems only by the web interface - well, perhaps that isn't totally true as I'm the only one that knows anything under the surface of the accounting system, but that's not a system that customers deal with. But for all the systems that count, the web interface isn't loaded on and made accessible until the admin knows how the stuff underneath the webinterface works. Of course, this is only true for UNIX, the Windows systems are effectively black boxes. An OS is unrepairable under the surface when the #1 way to fix it is to reinstall it. > > > > This is a personal taste thing. Some people like to buy cars > > that have a factory cd player/dvd player/drink cooler/hand washer/ > > power windows/power door locks/factory alarm/antitheft key/remote > > starter/extra fog lights/spoilers that do nothing at any legal speed/ > > gps systems/onstar systems/etc. etc. etc. > > > > Others like to buy cars with a minimal set of things that go a > > lot faster because they aren't loaded down with all the extra > > unnecessary baloney, and don't cost as much to repair because all > > the extra crap isn't breaking down all the time. > > > I agree again, I personally prefer keeping thisng as simple as I can. > But in this case I have succumbed with the easy thing. > > > > > It is the same with computers. I know of people who have > > Windows boxes that are so highly configured it takes them > > literally weeks to put backgrounds/sounds/games/doodads/etc.etc. > > on every little thing of their PC. To me it is sad to see > > this same attitude encroaching on FreeBSD. > > > > Thanks dear Ted, your post has made me think twice. I am going to study > the manual and try to configure the printer as you explained. I seems to > be easy and SIMPLE. > Well there's another phrase you should know that I'm a strong proponent of: If it ain't broke, don't fix it! Since your installation is working - it ain't broke. I wouldn't touch it unless the primary motivation is educational and you don't care if it breaks. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 10:38:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0726A16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:38:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from male.aldigital.co.uk (male.thebunker.net [213.129.64.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EBF43D39 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:38:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by male.aldigital.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8335197680; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:38:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])j05AcPON041338; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:38:25 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <41DBC39B.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:38:19 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Curtis Almond References: <92b67e1b050104152322d7beac@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <92b67e1b050104152322d7beac@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE8CE10714AACEA9904B22A2F" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: install.cfg disklabel customization question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:38:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE8CE10714AACEA9904B22A2F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Curtis Almond wrote: > Anyone know how to make /usr100 not mounted at boot time? Edit /etc/fstab and add the 'noauto' flag to the appropriate line. Something like this: /dev/ad0s2f /usr100 ufs rw,noauto 2 2 > Or even better.... > How can I create the ad0s2-4 (ad0s2f after boot) label but have > sysinstall not newfs it during netboot? You shouldn't need to recreate the disk or partition labels every time you reboot, unless you are wiping and re-installing most of the disk each time. If you're using sysinstall(8) to do an automatic install as part of your netboot process, then as far as I can tell, there's no way using the scripted interface to tell it to create a UFS partition but not newfs or mount it -- although that's easy enough using sysinstall interactively. I'd be thinking more along the lines of ditching sysinstall(8) entirely for that purpose and using fdisk(8), bsdlabel(8) and newfs(8) directly. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 8 Dane Court Manor School Rd PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Tilmanstone Tel: +44 1304 617253 Kent, CT14 0JL UK --------------enigE8CE10714AACEA9904B22A2F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQdvDoZr7OpndfbmCAQKOwAQAs1BoMfPU64y8Lf/f001B3YOiw3emlO6+ xvQpEety9RHzSsQ1cazq7VTV3FkLzANoeOtjY6iukW3CDgrw5yTh8urddjYFixld i+EG8/YL0UPz+nYsOOPR2IHddcCBea7+5soFJ/NjJWFjrNApkJgx5beGho9856dL skRgIgvAX3E= =TBZn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE8CE10714AACEA9904B22A2F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 10:57:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173CD16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:57:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BDA43D49 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:57:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j05Avrj27850; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:57:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Miguel Mendez" Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:57:52 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050105112031.54f063f9.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Epson Stylus C84 printer setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:57:59 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Miguel Mendez [mailto:flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org] > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 2:21 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Epson Stylus C84 printer setup > > > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:10:46 -0800 > "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: > > I don't understand where all this animosity against CUPS comes from, but > it's not the first time I've seen people flaming against it. If you > don't like it, don't use it. CUPS is very easy to troubleshoot, perhaps > you didn't bother reading the man pages. Enable debugging log mode and > read the logs, all the info is there. > Since the entire point of CUPS is to automate printer setup, if you have to enable debugging and read the man pages you have defeated the point of the program. You also take longer than 10 seconds which pretty much means you just self-invalidated your example here. > Setting up my USB laserprinter takes 10 seconds with CUPS. That is only because the version of CUPS that you use knows about your model of laser printer. > Drop the ppd > file, And that is only because someone wrote a PPD file for your model printer and that it is actually correct. > point the browser at localhost:631 and configure the printer. Hmm - one more TCP daemon listening at a port that could be busted into. > Done. The computer is a tool to get the job done, and most people have > better things to do than spend more time than needed setting up their > printer. It's also worth mentioning that Samba 3.x and CUPS integreate > seamlessly. > And for people that really don't want to spend time setting up their printer, they are best off purchasing a printer that is well supported by all these make-it-easy programs. But, this limits the choice of printers somewhat. When I bought my Epson C84 it was not completely supported. I bought it anyway because it was one of the few models that had separate ink resivors and that had support under UNIX. If I did what you did I would have followed the typical sketchy advice off the lists and been stuck with not all features working, and no way to be able to query the printer for ink levels. But if you did what I did you would have complete support because you spent the extra time to get the bits together to make it work. This took me a longer time than you yes. But, I get to laugh when people who have those money-sucking HP color inkjet printers have to go throw away an all-in-one ink cartridge because Cyan ran out and they still have a half-resivour of black ink left - then run out and buy another $60 all-in-one cartridge. > > Also, too many people out there have got the idea that CUPS is > > somehow required to make their printer work. Not good. This > > leads to less understanding of how things work. > > That's not true. Don't assume that someone who uses CUPS doesn't know > what's going on. > Don't put words into my mouth. > > It is the same with computers. I know of people who have > > Windows boxes that are so highly configured it takes them > > literally weeks to put backgrounds/sounds/games/doodads/etc.etc. > > on every little thing of their PC. To me it is sad to see > > this same attitude encroaching on FreeBSD. > > Flawed analogy :-) > Well, if you honestly believe that then that's an indication that we aren't completely lost yet, saints be praised. I won't spoil your faith, then. > And, for the nth time, please, don't top post. > I generally top post when the answer is a complete answer, meaning the question is embedded in the answer. I generally don't top post when I'm just responding with a one-liner. If you review my postings you will see not all are top posted. The primary reason for doing it this way is to defeat the sorts of people who have got into the bad habit of reading a short way into a long post then jumping to a response, usually with a bunch of invalid assumptions, made, of course, because they didn't bother to read all the way to the end of the post where they would have seen that their initial assumptions were wrong. :-) The secondary reason is that it's easier for the reader to not have to read the question twice. (once in the reply, once within my answer) Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 11:19:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677AE16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:19:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hawk.dcu.ie (mail.dcu.ie [136.206.1.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F56743D55; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:19:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svan@redbrick.dcu.ie) Received: from deathray.redbrick.dcu.ie (136.206.15.3) by hawk.dcu.ie (7.0.016) id 41108D190081EDA6; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:19:06 +0000 Received: from carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie ([2001:770:107:15:206:5bff:fefc:fb70] ident=mail) by deathray.redbrick.dcu.ie with esmtp (Exim 4.31) id 1Cm9Ca-0001mq-Co; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:19:44 +0000 Received: from svan by carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cm9C8-0001jw-00; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:19:16 +0000 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:19:16 +0000 From: Sarunas Vancevicius To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Message-ID: <20050105111916.GA26897@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie> References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: FreeBSD mobile Mailing List Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:19:08 -0000 On 16:52, Wed 05 Jan 05, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number > of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. > Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me > good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal > wireless card to work? > > Greg Hey Greg, A college friend has one of these, I don't know much about it, except that he is running Fedora Core 3 and had no luck trying to get internal wireless card working, so he had to get a PCMCIA wireless card. If thats any helpful to you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 11:22:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DE116A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:22:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF6843D1F; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:22:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id E453684ADF; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:52:24 +1030 (CST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:52:24 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Sarunas Vancevicius Message-ID: <20050105112224.GT53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050105111916.GA26897@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3dBJfKlFjfsS/piO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050105111916.GA26897@carbon.redbrick.dcu.ie> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: FreeBSD mobile Mailing List Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:22:28 -0000 --3dBJfKlFjfsS/piO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 5 January 2005 at 11:19:16 +0000, Sarunas Vancevicius wrote: > On 16:52, Wed 05 Jan 05, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number >> of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. >> Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me >> good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal >> wireless card to work? > > A college friend has one of these, I don't know much about it, > except that he is running Fedora Core 3 and had no luck trying to > get internal wireless card working, so he had to get a PCMCIA > wireless card. Thanks. > If thats any helpful to you. Well, Fedora Core 3 is Linux. As it happens, at work I've just installed it too. I don't think a failure there has much relevance to FreeBSD. But thanks for the feedback. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --3dBJfKlFjfsS/piO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB283wIubykFB6QiMRAlH/AJ4p402VJ+XecWNy/++2/oITI8fgdACdFa9O uQJSBwFkPHj3hZdh5Rt8/RQ= =XLLk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3dBJfKlFjfsS/piO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 11:24:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5756916A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:24:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D140643D4C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:24:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from [134.93.183.16] (edda.Geo.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.183.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E5E3000FD0 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:24:51 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DBCE87.6030703@uni-mainz.de> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:24:55 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Institut =?ISO-8859-15?Q?f=FCr_Geophysik?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-AT; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050102 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-mainz.de Subject: magicfilter 2.3.b: double sided printing on PS printer possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:24:53 -0000 Dear Sirs. Since the change from the older magicfilter 1.X to the newer version 2.X it's impoosible to me to print double sided on a double sided-capable PS-printer. In magicfilter 1.X I was able to add several piped preprocessings (psset ---setpagedevice=DOUBLE:true). In magicfilter 2.X this seems to be more complicated to do via editing the magicfilter.cf configuration file (which I can't). Does anyone has a hint? Thanks a lot in advance. Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 11:43:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58DA16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:43:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.terralink.de (mail.tlink.de [217.9.16.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8AF43D1D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:43:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de (daniel-s-haischt.biz [84.252.66.2]) by mail.terralink.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A17BD66A for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:43:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC9E18C0E for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:43:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 00674-05 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:43:05 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: none (smtp.abyssworld.de: 192.168.1.6 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of daniel.stefan.haischt.name) client-ip=192.168.1.6; envelope-from=me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name; helo=[192.168.120.239]; Received: from [192.168.120.239] (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58B518C08 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:43:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DBD2BB.70606@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:42:51 +0100 From: "Daniel S. Haischt" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Processed-By: GNU Anubis v4.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at abyssworld.de Subject: Can't find rootvp if booting with a plugged-in firewire HD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:43:06 -0000 Hello, I have a problem after adding a firewire hard disk to my system. I did format and label the drive and the drive works without any problem. After a reboot I am getting the following message after the firewire was detected: ffs_mountroot: can't find rootvp The firewire disk is /dev/da1 and my root (/) partition is /dev/da0s1a. After getting the above error message I am getting a boot prompt which allows me to manually specify an appropriate device. If typing ? to get a list of available devices, /dev/da0s1a is missing. I guess the solution to is problem is pretty trivial, but at the time I am to blind to see the solution. Any hints on how to solve this issue would be appreciated. -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards Daniel S. Haischt Wan't a complete signature??? Type at a shell prompt: $ > finger -l haischt@daniel.stefan.haischt.name From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 12:01:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EC216A4DF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:01:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay102-f34.bay102.hotmail.com [64.4.61.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75D543D4C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sangokoub@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:01:04 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 83.115.246.193 by by102fd.bay102.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:00:53 GMT X-Originating-IP: [83.115.246.193] X-Originating-Email: [sangokoub@hotmail.com] X-Sender: sangokoub@hotmail.com From: "k o u b" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:00:53 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2005 12:01:04.0246 (UTC) FILETIME=[3B498960:01C4F31E] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Can't ping between FreeBSD and Win2K... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:01:05 -0000 Hello, I was setup the Win2K as client on the 192.168.3.2 ip adress (netmask 255.255.255.0), with a passerel on the FreeBSD (5.3R MINI-INSTALL) and the ip adress is 192.168.3.1. the Win2K computer name is "windaube" and the FreeBSD computer name is "skoub". you can look bottom for detailled statistics: ______________________________________________________________________ ______ ______________________________________________________________________ ______ ______________________________________________________________________ ______ ON THE WIN2K COMPUTER: C:\> route print ====================================================================== ===== Liste d'Interfaces 0x1 ....................... MS TCP Loopback interface 0x1000003 ...00 04 ac 45 91 fb ...... IBM 10/100 EtherJet PCI Adapter ====================================================================== ===== ====================================================================== ===== Itinéraires actifs : Destination réseau Masque réseau Adr. passerelle Adr. interface Métrique 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1 192.168.3.2 1 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.2 192.168.3.2 1 192.168.3.2 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 192.168.3.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.3.2 192.168.3.2 1 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.3.2 192.168.3.2 1 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.3.2 192.168.3.2 1 Passerelle par défaut : 192.168.3.1 ====================================================================== ===== Itinéraires persistants : Aucun C:\> ping 192.168.3.2 Envoi d'une requête 'ping' sur 192.168.3.2 avec 32 octets de données : Réponse de 192.168.3.2 : octets=32 temps<10 ms TTL=128 Réponse de 192.168.3.2 : octets=32 temps<10 ms TTL=128 Réponse de 192.168.3.2 : octets=32 temps<10 ms TTL=128 Réponse de 192.168.3.2 : octets=32 temps<10 ms TTL=128 Statistiques Ping pour 192.168.3.2: Paquets : envoyés = 4, reçus = 4, perdus = 0 (perte 0%), Durée approximative des boucles en millisecondes : minimum = 0ms, maximum = 0ms, moyenne = 0ms C:\> ping 192.168.3.1 Envoi d'une requête 'ping' sur 192.168.3.1 avec 32 octets de données : Délai d'attente de la demande dépassé. Délai d'attente de la demande dépassé. Délai d'attente de la demande dépassé. Délai d'attente de la demande dépassé. Statistiques Ping pour 192.168.3.1: Paquets : envoyés = 4, reçus = 0, perdus = 4 (perte 100%) Durée approcimative des boucles en millisecondes : minimum = 0ms, maximum = 0 ms, moyenne = 0ms C:\> arp -a Aucune entrée ARP trouvée ______________________________________________________________________ ______ ______________________________________________________________________ ______ ______________________________________________________________________ ______ ON THE FREEBSD COMPUTER (su mode): # ifconfig -a fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.3.255 inet6 fe80::204:acff:fe25:c4bd%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:04:ac:25:c4:bd media: Ethernet autoselect (100 baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8008 mtu 16384 tun0: flags=8051 mtu 1500 Opened by PID 200 # route get default route: writing to routing socket: No such process # route get 192.168.3.1 route to: skoub destination: skoub interface: lo0 flags: recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msec rttvar hopcount mtu expire 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0 # route get 192.168.3.2 route to: windaube destination: 192.168.3.0 mask: 255.255.255.0 interface: fxp0 flags: recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msec rttvar hopcount mtu expire 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 -2153 # ping 192.168.3.1 PING 192.168.3.1 (192.168.3.1):56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.288 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.232 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.223 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.3.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.216 ms ^C 'arret de l utilisateur --- 192.168.3.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.216/0.240/0.288/0.028 ms # ping 192.168.3.2 PING 192.168.3.2 (192.168.3.2):56 data bytes ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down ^C 'stop by user --- 192.168.3.2 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss ______________________________________________________________________ ______ File: /etc/rc.conf linux_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="NONE" natd_enable="NO" inetd_enable="NO" ipv6cp_enable="NO" hostname="skoub.koubyland.fr" network_interfaces="rl0" (or fxp0 with INTEL cards) ifconfig_lo0="inet 127.0.0.1" ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" (or fxp0 with INTEL cards) gateway_enable="YES" dhcpd_enable="YES" ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_nat="NO" ppp_profile="okdoki" ______________________________________________________________________ ______ File: /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.koubyland.fr 192.168.3.1 skoub skoub.koubyland.fr 192.168.3.2 windaube windaube.koubyland.fr ______________________________________________________________________ ______ ______________________________________________________________________ ______ ______________________________________________________________________ ______ With the "tcpdump -i rl0" command, computers can communicate but they loose some packets. I was trying to find some help to a FreeBSD IRC Channel when a guy said to me : "Realtek chips is a peace of shit", i try with "INTEL 100 PRO" card but it's not work. I change the RJ45 cable by a HUB with to cable to connect computers, but it's the same result. I don't understand... :/ Please, someone can help me? TIA, skoub. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 12:47:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808CC16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:47:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from recife.ipadnet.com.br (recife.ipadnet.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4FC43D48; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:47:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from marioLobo ([200.249.204.142]) by recife.ipadnet.com.br (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j05CrxwT031067; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:53:59 -0300 From: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Organization: IPAD To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:51:40 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41DBB8AC.25603.26B282@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: sk0: discard oversize frame (ether type ....) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:47:36 -0000 Hi everyone; Using freeBsd 5.3. Trying to get the gigabit sk driver to work but even if I force it to 100b= aseTX full-duplex I still get when doing an ftp session: sk0: discard oversize frame (ether type ....) sk0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header ( len 0 pkt len 0) The transfer finishes ok though. I have two machines conected via crossover cat 5 RJ-45. Besides the above = errors, I get a 3.5 MB/s tranfer rate, which is way bellow the 10 MB/s I get when doing the same th= ing with 2 via-rhine boards. I found this patch on google, but it=B4s a bit outside of my programming s= kills: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/pci/if_sk.c,v retrieving revision 1.86 diff -u -r1.86 if_sk.c --- if_sk.c20 Aug 2004 06:22:04 -00001.86 +++ if_sk.c1 Nov 2004 00:54:20 -0000 @@ -1816,11 +1816,13 @@ } /* Transmit */ -sc_if->sk_cdata.sk_tx_prod =3D idx; -CSR_WRITE_4(sc, sc_if->sk_tx_bmu, SK_TXBMU_TX_START); +if (idx !=3D sc_if->sk_cdata.sk_tx_prod) { +sc_if->sk_cdata.sk_tx_prod =3D idx; +CSR_WRITE_4(sc, sc_if->sk_tx_bmu, SK_TXBMU_TX_START); -/* Set a timeout in case the chip goes out to lunch. */ -ifp->if_timer =3D 5; +/* Set a timeout in case the chip goes out to lunch. */ +ifp->if_timer =3D 5; +} SK_IF_UNLOCK(sc_if); return; @@ -1960,13 +1962,15 @@ } sc_if->sk_cdata.sk_tx_cnt--; SK_INC(idx, SK_TX_RING_CNT); -ifp->if_timer =3D 0; } -sc_if->sk_cdata.sk_tx_cons =3D idx; - -if (cur_tx !=3D NULL) +if (sc_if->sk_cdata.sk_tx_cnt =3D=3D 0) { +ifp->if_timer =3D 0; ifp->if_flags &=3D ~IFF_OACTIVE; +} else /* nudge chip to keep tx ring moving */ +CSR_WRITE_4(sc, sc_if->sk_tx_bmu, SK_TXBMU_TX_START); + +sc_if->sk_cdata.sk_tx_cons =3D idx; return; } =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The person who found it said that he grabbed from netbsd. Maybe one of you guys can shed some light on this for me. Thanks, -- //| //|| // | // || -//--//---|| ARIO LOBO // // || --------------------------------- mario.lobo@ipad.com.br http://www.ipad.com.br From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 12:59:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4278216A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:59:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C8843D53; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:59:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1750E1FFACE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:59:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id EA9811FFACD; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 45C071550C; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:58:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE301539E; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:58:30 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br In-Reply-To: <41DBB8AC.25603.26B282@localhost> Message-ID: References: <41DBB8AC.25603.26B282@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sk0: discard oversize frame (ether type ....) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:59:07 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 mario.lobo@ipad.com.br wrote: Hi, > Using freeBsd 5.3. ... > Maybe one of you guys can shed some light on this for me. please update to RELENG_5; it's fixed there already:) -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 13:00:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDC516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:00:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.terralink.de (mail.tlink.de [217.9.16.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AD743D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:00:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de (daniel-s-haischt.biz [84.252.66.2]) by mail.terralink.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19464BD5E2 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:00:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00E718C80; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:00:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 00852-02; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:00:22 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: none (smtp.abyssworld.de: 192.168.1.6 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of daniel.stefan.haischt.name) client-ip=192.168.1.6; envelope-from=me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name; helo=[192.168.120.239]; Received: from [192.168.120.239] (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEB118C7A; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:00:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DBE4E6.2080903@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:00:22 +0100 From: "Daniel S. Haischt" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Daniel S. Haischt" References: <41DBD2BB.70606@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> In-Reply-To: <41DBD2BB.70606@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Processed-By: GNU Anubis v4.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at abyssworld.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can't find rootvp if booting with a plugged-in firewire HD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:00:18 -0000 OK - I did find the answer ... After plugging-in the firewire device, /dev/da0 changes to /dev/da1 while botting and /dev/da1 (aka firewire) changes to /dev/da0. How can it be accomplished that /dev/da0 (my non-removable SCSI disk) remains /dev/da0, no matter how many removable drives are added to the system? I already did set the ATA_STATIC_ID option in my kernel configuration file. I am running FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE. Regards Daniel S. Haischt Daniel S. Haischt schrieb: > Hello, > > I have a problem after adding a firewire hard > disk to my system. I did format and label the > drive and the drive works without any problem. > > After a reboot I am getting the following message > after the firewire was detected: > > ffs_mountroot: can't find rootvp > > The firewire disk is /dev/da1 and my root (/) > partition is /dev/da0s1a. After getting the above > error message I am getting a boot prompt which > allows me to manually specify an appropriate > device. If typing ? to get a list of available > devices, /dev/da0s1a is missing. > > I guess the solution to is problem is pretty > trivial, but at the time I am to blind to see > the solution. > > Any hints on how to solve this issue would be > appreciated. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 13:18:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E7116A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:18:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.speakeasy.net (mail1.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2062F43D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:18:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20878 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2005 13:18:03 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 Jan 2005 13:18:03 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A07B469; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:18:02 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Adam References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 05 Jan 2005 08:18:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44vfac9fqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Privoxy at boot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:18:04 -0000 Adam writes: > able to find out how to make it start up at boot. I tried /etc/rc.conf > but no luck. Well, no. rc.conf is for *configuration* information, not for executing commands. It gets sourced *many* times at startup. There are several different ways to start something at boot; the documentation is available by typing "man rc". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 13:26:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCD516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:26:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94B043D54 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:26:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so139584wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:26:12 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=TZisT91VotcnHgrF1HE6K7JNlL+rGnWCAezHE3RTs2zMUKwJzgPiuKpvs6zJPf/1OejGeQnQ/Hzu6A3jHDB+JulPWmUOW5E5Xx5shWNmryGDkN4IJGpcqMWBQs8oV6kJeDPLcrqihs80OWOuLd8+zQh4ReiFB32Rk35dlWZdyRE= Received: by 10.54.42.41 with SMTP id p41mr74666wrp; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:26:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:26:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:26:12 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Jordan Michaels In-Reply-To: <41D9CE4C.4080306@viviotech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41D9C7BC.2050309@bouncebk.com> <41D9CE4C.4080306@viviotech.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.10 and finding dependant packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:26:13 -0000 On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 14:59:24 -0800, Jordan Michaels wrote: > So, my questions is simple: What do I need to do to figure out what > packages require apache to be installed? I've worked with SuSE's YAST > tool and RPM's (and tools that manage RPM's... like YAST), but what's > the BSD way to go about this? You can manage software quite well with the ports collection. This is a good place to get an idea of how packages and ports differ, and how to use them. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html Then you can use portupgrade to keep your installed ports and dependencies up-to-date. It'll save you some headache. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 13:36:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7295B16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:36:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1385443D49 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:36:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so172198wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:36:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=pOJ4dZaGQXyevsGRPqv8vSqbfYG2qHhc4Oy0jo+Uu/vuKen1vpWNUEjnyShJlVa9JIIITZcAS+bNq4d+dZuf8ybNkB/1bRWDk5A7aHxl5NUYCVi7RFUGOzzVWUDBGg8gIEF+OfcnHvGZ/Few90fH6fHHPsjLZl1d10S7y6h3qPE= Received: by 10.54.7.6 with SMTP id 6mr24797wrg; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 05:36:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.33.61 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 05:36:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2b5f066d050105053658d1dec4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:36:37 -0500 From: Brian McCann To: FreeBSD mailinglist In-Reply-To: <1104882220.29610.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <2b5f066d0501041429705f2b50@mail.gmail.com> <1104882220.29610.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> cc: Bob Van Zant Subject: Re: NIS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brian McCann List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:36:38 -0000 Nope...just tried that with no luck. Thanks though. Any other ideas anyone? --Brian On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:43:40 -0800, Bob Van Zant wrote: > Are your dates screwed up? By that I mean is master.passwd newer than > your NIS file? Try touch(1)ing your NIS file and then running make. > > I've never actually setup NIS before. My comment is just based on my > experiences with make. > > -Bob > > On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 17:29 -0500, Brian McCann wrote: > > HI all...I'm having a NIS problem I can't figure out. I've done this > > before on 4.7, and countless other times on RedHat...but this is > > evading me. I'm trying to re-make my databases since I've added a > > user, I go into /var/yp and run "make mynis" and get "`mynis' is up to > > date.", which I know can't be right. I've got to be missing something > > somewhere. > > I've added the line to the Makefile "MASTER_PASSWD = > > /etc/master.passwd" so that YP uses the file in /etc...or at > > least...that's all I recall having to do on 4.7, and doctored up the > > sections that involve the passwd files changed it to only look at UIDs > > greater then 3. > > Can someone point out my probably obvious mistake? > > > > Thanks, > > --Brian > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > =================================================================== > > This footer was appended by the Honeypot Injector > > The message was injected from 216.136.204.119 > > on 04 Jan 2005 14:29:24 -0800. This IP > > was classified in the WHITELIST sender group. > > The org ID is 1681939, and the SBRS is 2.1 > > =================================================================== > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 13:42:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDABC16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:42:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao12.cox.net (lakermmtao12.cox.net [68.230.240.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DB043D1D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:42:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from router.rcservers.com ([68.12.171.184]) by lakermmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP <20050105134158.BXUU1656.lakermmtao12.cox.net@router.rcservers.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:41:58 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.rcservers.com [127.0.0.1]) by router.rcservers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3003C123D9; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:42:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from router.rcservers.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (router.rcservers.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86679-06; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:42:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from dredster (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by router.rcservers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE9B123D8; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:42:13 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <032801c4f32c$0e7e10f0$0201a8c0@dredster> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "Brian McCann" , "FreeBSD mailinglist" References: <2b5f066d0501041429705f2b50@mail.gmail.com> <1104882220.29610.82.camel@localhost.localdomain> <2b5f066d050105053658d1dec4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:40:00 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 cc: Bob Van Zant Subject: Re: NIS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:42:00 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian McCann" To: "FreeBSD mailinglist" Cc: "Bob Van Zant" Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 7:36 AM Subject: Re: NIS > Nope...just tried that with no luck. Thanks though. Any other ideas > anyone? > > --Brian > > > On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:43:40 -0800, Bob Van Zant > wrote: >> Are your dates screwed up? By that I mean is master.passwd newer than >> your NIS file? Try touch(1)ing your NIS file and then running make. >> >> I've never actually setup NIS before. My comment is just based on my >> experiences with make. >> >> -Bob >> >> On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 17:29 -0500, Brian McCann wrote: >> > HI all...I'm having a NIS problem I can't figure out. I've done >> > this >> > before on 4.7, and countless other times on RedHat...but this is >> > evading me. I'm trying to re-make my databases since I've added a >> > user, I go into /var/yp and run "make mynis" and get "`mynis' is up >> > to >> > date.", which I know can't be right. I've got to be missing >> > something >> > somewhere. >> > I've added the line to the Makefile "MASTER_PASSWD = >> > /etc/master.passwd" so that YP uses the file in /etc...or at >> > least...that's all I recall having to do on 4.7, and doctored up >> > the >> > sections that involve the passwd files changed it to only look at >> > UIDs >> > greater then 3. >> > Can someone point out my probably obvious mistake? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > --Brian >> > _______________________________________________ >> > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> > =================================================================== >> > This footer was appended by the Honeypot Injector >> > The message was injected from 216.136.204.119 >> > on 04 Jan 2005 14:29:24 -0800. This IP >> > was classified in the WHITELIST sender group. >> > The org ID is 1681939, and the SBRS is 2.1 >> > =================================================================== >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" If you've added a user with adduser and need to update your nis maps, cd /var/yp and type make. -- Micheal Patterson TSG Network Administration 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 07:17:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F260216A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:17:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtaout-w.tc.umn.edu (mtaout-w.tc.umn.edu [160.94.160.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A0643D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:17:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "") Received: from 192.168.1.14 (ip68-104-63-160.lv.lv.cox.net [68.104.63.160] (may be forged)) by mtaout-w.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:17:47 -0600 (CST) X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] ip68-104-63-160.lv.lv.cox.net [68.104.63.160] #+HF+TS+AU From: Joe Dunsmore <> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:14:09 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200501041114.09072.Joe Dunsmore <>> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:43:55 +0000 Subject: Re: How to get internet working on installed freebsd 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 07:17:49 -0000 > i would simply suggest running /stand/sysinstall That worked, thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 13:47:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5482C16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:47:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.50.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E3643D5D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:47:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (localhost.uwaterloo.ca [127.0.0.1]) j05DllAG060345; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:47:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: (from www@localhost) by ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j05Dllxf060344; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:47:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca: www set sender to bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca using -f Received: from 65.93.198.45 ( [65.93.198.45])HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:47:47 -0500 Message-ID: <1104932867.41dbf003405b1@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:47:47 -0500 From: Bruce Campbell To: Kris Kennaway References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104221531.GA70844@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104892047.41db508f4c7f4@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050105045329.GA77072@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050105045329.GA77072@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 / FreeBSD-4.6.2 X-Originating-IP: 65.93.198.45 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow - traced to getpwnam maybe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:47:48 -0000 Quoting Kris Kennaway : > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:27:27PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote: > > > I wrote a small program: > > > > #include > > #include > > > > main( int argc, char *argv[] ) > > { > > getpwuid( 13076 ); > > } > > > > and ran it under truss on 5.x and it generated 178,711 lines of output. > > (the bulk of which is those lseek/read calls as above) > > ... > > Try tuning the pwd_mkdb parameters (see hash(3)) in > /usr/src/usr.sbin/pwd_mkdb/pwd_mkdb.c and recompile: > > HASHINFO openinfo = { > 4096, /* bsize */ > 32, /* ffactor */ > 256, /* nelem */ > 2048 * 1024, /* cachesize */ > NULL, /* hash() */ > 0 /* lorder */ > }; > > e.g. adjust nelem to 12000 to accomodate your > significantly-larger-than-average password database. If this helps, > please submit a PR requesting that someone make an option to pwd_mkdb > to tune this at runtime (or better yet, submit the patch to do this > yourself - it's straightforward to modify the source to do this). Thanks. That had no effect on the large number of seeks/reads to do a getpwuid of a specific uid. I tried boosting that number further, still no change. I suspect the problem is related to some change to the hash functions between 4.7 and 5.2.1 and I hope to get to the bottom of it today. I tried two getpwnam (as opposed to getpwuid) calls on 2 different userids, one took 1000 seek/reads, the other 16,000, so it's all pretty random, no doubt related to how stuff gets hashed. On 4.7 it takes just one or two reads/seeks. As each login via ipop, imap, and each sendmail, and just about everything will be doing getpwnam's I think this is our problem. -- Bruce Campbell Engineering Computing CPH-2374B University of Waterloo (519)888-4567 ext 5889 ---------------------------------------- This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 13:57:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771AF16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:57:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.enter.net (smtp.enter.net [216.193.128.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E2B43D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:57:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gaving@enter.net) Received: from localhost (mail.enter.net [216.193.128.40]) by smtp.enter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835B1CCE6D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:57:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [216.193.128.217] (grabes2.enter.net [216.193.128.217]) by smtp.enter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4BECCB9A for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:57:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41DBF239.5040007@enter.net> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:57:13 -0500 From: Gavin Grabias User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041214) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checker-Version: Enter.Net Virus Scanner 1.1 Subject: Unexpected soft update inconsistency X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:57:36 -0000 Hi Everyone, A user is having a problem accessing their maildir. The problem arose when we tried to access it as well. When doing an ls in their directory the one file returns the following: ls -l 1104761413.M777698P25745V0400FF01I0239B49E_0.rmail4.enter.net\,S\=6806 ls: 1104761413.M777698P25745V0400FF01I0239B49E_0.rmail4.enter.net,S=6806: Bad file descriptor So our logical approach was to reboot the machine in the middle of the night and fsck it. However, that returned the following results and will not continue: unexpected soft update inconsitency cannot fix, first entry in dir contains . filename inumber -1012078592 out of range. missing '.' I=31407659 My thoughts are to delete the inode that is out of range, and re-fsck it one night. Is my thinking logical or does this filesystem need to be completely redone. System Stats: Freebsd 4.10-R 12 - 74GB Maxtor Raptors 3ware 9500 raid card - raid 10 -- Gavin Grabias Enter.Net, Inc. Phone: (610) 437-2221 "The Road to the Internet Starts Here!" (tm) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 14:10:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6046F16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:10:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from recife.ipadnet.com.br (recife.ipadnet.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE0E43D2F; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:10:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from marioLobo ([200.249.204.142]) by recife.ipadnet.com.br (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j05EGnwT008452; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:16:49 -0300 From: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Organization: IPAD To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:14:30 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41DBCC16.20021.728A47@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: References: <41DBB8AC.25603.26B282@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sk0: discard oversize frame (ether type ....) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:10:28 -0000 Doing it right now!! Thanks, -- //| //|| // | // || -//--//---|| ARIO LOBO // // || --------------------------------- mario.lobo@ipad.com.br http://www.ipad.com.br On 5 Jan 2005 at 12:58, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > please update to RELENG_5; it's fixed there already:) > > -- > Greetings > Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 14:25:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11D716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:25:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.terralink.de (mail.tlink.de [217.9.16.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8153443D4C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:25:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de (daniel-s-haischt.biz [84.252.66.2]) by mail.terralink.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DA7BD5EA; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:25:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28CC18CCA; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:25:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 36845-03; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:25:45 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: none (smtp.abyssworld.de: 192.168.1.6 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of daniel.stefan.haischt.name) client-ip=192.168.1.6; envelope-from=me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name; helo=[192.168.120.239]; Received: from [192.168.120.239] (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D44918C59; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:25:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DBF8DF.7080002@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:25:35 +0100 From: "Daniel S. Haischt" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert References: <44vfac9fqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44vfac9fqt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080002040302070003080003" X-Processed-By: GNU Anubis v4.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at abyssworld.de X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Adam Subject: Re: Privoxy at boot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:25:49 -0000 --------------080002040302070003080003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, try the attached rcNG file I just did create it a couples of days ago. It is not perfect but the file does its job. You'll need to add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf privoxy_enable="YES" privoxy_flags="/usr/local/etc/privoxy/config" -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards Daniel S. Haischt Wan't a complete signature??? Type at a shell prompt: $ > finger -l haischt@daniel.stefan.haischt.name Lowell Gilbert schrieb: > Adam writes: > > >>able to find out how to make it start up at boot. I tried /etc/rc.conf >>but no luck. > > > Well, no. rc.conf is for *configuration* information, not for > executing commands. It gets sourced *many* times at startup. > > There are several different ways to start something at boot; > the documentation is available by typing "man rc". > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > !DSPAM:41dbe931162192725988344! > > --------------080002040302070003080003-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 14:41:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25F516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:41:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp807.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp807.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A329543D48 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from donaldj1066@fastmail.fm) Received: from unknown (HELO pres7000.mylan.net) (donaldj@ameritech.net@69.211.77.105 with plain) by smtp807.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 14:41:21 -0000 From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:41:03 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> In-Reply-To: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501050841.03874.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> Subject: Re: modem not responding to mgetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:41:23 -0000 On Tuesday 04 January 2005 11:57 am, Timothy Luoma wrote: > I have been attempting to setup mgetty (installed from ports) to > allow me to dial IN to my FreeBSD 5.3 machine. > > (FWIW, the modem works under WinXP for dialing *out*. XP reports it > as: "PCI Slot 2 PCI Bus 1, Device 1, function 0" on "COM3") > > FreeBSD seems to see it: > > $ dmesg|grep "^sio" > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 > on acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > > (it is /dev/cuaa0 on FreeBSD) > > > Thanks in advance for any pointers > > TjL > > _______________________________________________ Tim, Do you have a serial port on your computer? If you do, somewhere in dmesg it should be telling you that your modem was moved to a different port. Below is the out put from my computer: donaldj ==> dmesg |grep "^sio" sio0: <3COM PCI FaxModem> port 0x1490-0x1497 irq 3 at device 10.0 on pci0 sio0: moving to sio4 sio4: type 16550A sio0: port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled Also, look at /dev for more than cuaa0 donaldj ==> ll /dev | grep cua crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 240, 128 Jan 1 09:55 cuaa0 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 240, 132 Jan 1 09:55 cuaa4 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 239, 160 Jan 1 09:55 cuaia0 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 239, 164 Jan 1 09:55 cuaia4 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 239, 192 Jan 1 09:55 cuala0 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 239, 196 Jan 1 09:55 cuala4 Don -- Donald J. O'Neill donaldj1066@fastmail.fm I'm not totally useless, I can be used as a bad example. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 14:50:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AF516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:50:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from simsiz.net (mail.simsiz.net [62.212.232.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1DB43D45 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:50:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nazim@simsiz.net) Received: from localhost ([192.168.50.19]) by simsiz.net (simsiz.net [127.0.0.1]) (MDaemon.PRO.v7.1.0.R) with ESMTP id md50000278527.msg for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:38:05 +0400 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:38:00 +0400 From: Nazim Aliyev X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional Organization: Az. StarNet Wireless Internet Provider X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <942175979.20050105183800@simsiz.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Processed: simsiz.net, Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:38:05 +0400 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.50.19 X-Return-Path: nazim@simsiz.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-MDAV-Processed: simsiz.net, Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:38:08 +0400 Subject: SSHD on FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nazim Aliyev List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:50:08 -0000 Hi everybody. I have following problem. I installed FreeBSD 5.3, and after installation sshd stated succesfully. But when I tried to login to server using different SSH clients it doesn't let me to pass. I open /etc/ssh/sshd_config and unmark following string PasswordAuthetification yes. But it's still does not work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 14:55:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E9016A4CF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:55:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spatula.dreamhost.com (spatula.dreamhost.com [66.33.205.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA6143D1D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:55:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-68-75-26-197.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [68.75.26.197]) by spatula.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752317D029; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:55:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200501051458.03000.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> References: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <200501051458.03000.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:55:14 -0500 To: Malcolm Kay X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: modem not responding to mgetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:55:14 -0000 On Jan 4, 2005, at 11:28 PM, Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:27 am, Timothy Luoma wrote: > (FWIW, the modem works under WinXP for dialing *out*. XP reports it as: >> "PCI Slot 2 PCI Bus 1, Device 1, function 0" on "COM3") >> >> FreeBSD seems to see it: >> >> $ dmesg|grep "^sio" >> sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 >> on >> acpi0 >> sio0: type 16550A >> >> (it is /dev/cuaa0 on FreeBSD) > > This looks like the standard serial port known as COM1 in windows. ah... well that could be. I was a bit concerned when I realized that Windows called it COM3 > (cuua0 is for outgoing connections -- incoming would normally be on > ttyd0) > You probably want cuua2 or ttyd2 and may need to do something with the > device.hints file to get these to appear. mgetty seems to have editied /etc/ttys like this: ttyd0 "/usr/local/sbin/mgetty -s 115200" dialup on secure ttyd1 "/usr/local/sbin/mgetty -s 115200" dialup on secure so based on your comments I added ttyd2 "/usr/local/sbin/mgetty -s 115200" dialup on secure and changed the line in /usr/local/etc/mgetty+sendfax/mgetty.config to port cuaa2 and rebooted, which caused this error: 01/05 09:39:38 yd2 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.31-Jul24 01/05 09:39:38 yd2 check for lockfiles 01/05 09:39:38 yd2 locking the line 01/05 09:39:38 yd2 mod: cannot open line /dev/ttyd2: No such file or directory 01/05 09:39:38 yd2 open device /dev/ttyd2 failed: No such file or directory 01/05 09:39:38 yd2 cannot get terminal line dev=ttyd2, exiting: No such file or directory I'm unfamiliar with "device.hints" (other than having now read its man page), so I'm unsure as to whether this appears to be something that it would be able to fix. > Certainly appears that mgetty is not looking at the modem port but an > ordinary > serial port. That would explain it. > I don't believe you should need mgetty for basic modem login -- getty > should work. > Set ttyd2 to "on" in /etc/ttys. Yeah, it was one of those cases where the page I found when googling suggested mgetty, so I just went with that. > However listen to what others have to say -- I don't claim to be > expert in this area > -- especially not with the new features of 5.x I'll keep that in mind, but so far you're well ahead of me as far as expertise ;-) TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 14:58:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9351616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:58:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spatula.dreamhost.com (spatula.dreamhost.com [66.33.205.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685F343D46 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:58:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-68-75-26-197.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [68.75.26.197]) by spatula.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9BD17D014; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 06:58:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20050105045502.51147.qmail@web41501.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050105045502.51147.qmail@web41501.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <32860C19-5F2A-11D9-BE17-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:58:02 -0500 To: Jim Arnold X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS (NOT ME)!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:58:02 -0000 On Jan 4, 2005, at 11:55 PM, Jim Arnold wrote: >> I've hit a wall getting this to work: > >> ?spike# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mDNSResponder.sh start >> .: Can't open /etc/rc.subr: No such file or directory > > I created a symlink to /usr/local/etc/rc.subr from > /etc and it now works like a charm! I'd suspect that you could have also changed /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mDNSResponder.sh from . /etc/rc.subr to . /usr/local/etc/rc.subr and that would have worked equally as well, but other things may look for it in /etc/ as well. Glad it works! TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 14:59:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1638816A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:59:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lp1001.snu.ac.kr (lp1001.snu.ac.kr [147.46.70.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787D343D1D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by lp1001.snu.ac.kr (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j05EvQa2015162 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:57:27 +0900 Message-ID: <41DC00DF.10902@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:59:43 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD References: <942175979.20050105183800@simsiz.net> In-Reply-To: <942175979.20050105183800@simsiz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SSHD on FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:59:46 -0000 Nazim Aliyev wrote: > Hi everybody. > I have following problem. > I installed FreeBSD 5.3, and after installation sshd stated succesfully. But when I tried to login to server using different SSH clients it doesn't let me to pass. I open /etc/ssh/sshd_config and unmark following string PasswordAuthetification yes. But it's still does not work. Possibly incompatible SSH versions of server en client. Are the clients on MS-Windows systems? Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 15:15:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3652D16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:15:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EA143D54 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:15:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@jwebmedia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (66.49.54.54.nw.nuvox.net [66.49.54.54]) j05FFBdj001198 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:15:12 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:14:56 -0600 From: "Joseph Koenig (jWeb)" To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Hardware or OS problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:15:13 -0000 Hi, We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The system is FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the kicker) 73GB RAID 1 ATA drives. The system serves as a web/database server dedicated to 1 site. Daily the system goes out and downloads real estate listings (via shell scripts and cURL) and processes them (via PHP into MySQL). Also, nightly the system downloads a zipped set of images (probably around 400-500) and processes them into thumbnails (PHP scripts calling ImageMagick). Over the last week or two, the system is crashing and rebooting into single user mode. It's not consistently during updates, or resizing of images, or anything like that. Yesterday, it crashed with 99% processor idle and load averages of 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- I was watching a 'top' when the machine died. When it boots into single user mode, an fsck must be run, which identified a few corrupt JPEG files -- however, the sysadmin who reboots it never tells me which files they are. The sysadmin is convinced it is a FreeBSD problem and says that Linux will not crash because of a corrupt file and if it does, will not boot into single user mode and he will be able to access it remotely to do the fsck. About 3-4 weeks ago, one of the drives in the mirror set crashed and had to be replaced. I'm not convinced that drives are not to blame for these issues. Is there any way to verify that? Is it possible a corrupt JPEG on the drive could cause the system to crash randomly? What can I do to correctly identify the problem so that we can fix it and not change the OS? Thanks, Joe Koenig Production Manager jWeb New Media Design joe@jWebmedia.com http://www.jwebmedia.com/ 636.928.3162 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 15:25:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F50916A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:25:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spatula.dreamhost.com (spatula.dreamhost.com [66.33.205.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6725A43D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:25:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-68-75-26-197.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [68.75.26.197]) by spatula.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A495417D024; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:25:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200501050841.03874.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> References: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <200501050841.03874.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <0AAB74E3-5F2E-11D9-BE17-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:25:33 -0500 To: "Donald J. O'Neill" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: modem not responding to mgetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:25:33 -0000 > Do you have a serial port on your computer? There's a 9 pin connector (nothing attached) that I'm not sure what it's for, a printer port, and mouse and keyboard connectors, otherwise they are all USB ports. (Hardware is NOT my specialty. This is a new Dell Dimension 3000, if that helps any.) > If you do, somewhere in dmesg it should be telling you that your modem > was moved to a different port. Below is the out put from my computer: > > donaldj ==> dmesg |grep "^sio" > sio0: <3COM PCI FaxModem> port 0x1490-0x1497 irq 3 at device 10.0 on > pci0 > sio0: moving to sio4 > sio4: type 16550A > sio0: port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled This remains all that dmesg shows: # dmesg |grep "^sio" sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled I'm starting to think that my modem (US Robotics that I salvaged from an old HP I had) isn't detected by FreeBSD on boot. If so, would I be better off getting a new modem that might be recognized? It's a 56k fax modem, IIRC what WinXP was telling me. (I tried to save $20 by not buying a modem installed by Dell, and I knew I was going to regret it...) > Also, look at /dev for more than cuaa0 > > donaldj ==> ll /dev | grep cua > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 240, 128 Jan 1 09:55 cuaa0 > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 240, 132 Jan 1 09:55 cuaa4 > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 239, 160 Jan 1 09:55 cuaia0 > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 239, 164 Jan 1 09:55 cuaia4 > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 239, 192 Jan 1 09:55 cuala0 > crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 239, 196 Jan 1 09:55 cuala4 # ls -l /dev/ | fgrep cua crw-rw---- 1 uucp uucp 237, 128 Jan 5 10:04 cuaa0 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 236, 160 Jan 5 09:42 cuaia0 crw-rw---- 1 uucp dialer 236, 192 Jan 5 09:42 cuala0 I'm not sure what that tells me. Should I be telling mgetty to use cuaia0 or cuala0? (Is there a good way to test a new /etc/ttys and mgetty config w/o doing a full reboot?) TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 15:26:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F78116A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:26:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEC943D5A for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:26:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CmD37-0007nK-3r for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:26:13 +0100 Message-ID: <41DC0714.2000408@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:26:12 +0100 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041124 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi list, i use 5.3-RELEASE-p2. When i try to load module iir for my ICP raid controller, i get: root@antsrv1 [~] # kldload iir kldload: can't load iir: No such file or directory root@antsrv1 [~] # [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- Subject: cam_simq_alloc undefined X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:26:16 -0000 Hi list, i use 5.3-RELEASE-p2. When i try to load module iir for my ICP raid controller, i get: root@antsrv1 [~] # kldload iir kldload: can't load iir: No such file or directory root@antsrv1 [~] # dmesg shows that 'cam_simq_alloc' is undefined. However, module cam.ko, which exports cam_simq_alloc is loaded: root@antsrv1 [~] # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 4 0xc0400000 37a5b0 kernel 2 14 0xc077b000 537f0 acpi.ko 3 1 0xc37f1000 31000 cam.ko root@antsrv1 [~] # root@antsrv1 [/boot/kernel] # nm cam.ko|grep cam_simq_alloc 0000e70c T cam_simq_alloc root@antsrv1 [/boot/kernel] # What am i missing here? I need to load the scsi stuff as modules, because otherwise i have to reboot after every change to the raid controller's configuration (which i am playing with ATM). Or is there another way to have the kernel rescan the raid controller for disks? Thanks for any hints, Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax : -3341 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 15:28:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2642416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:28:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (esemetz.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF2C43D46 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:28:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregorynou@altern.org) Received: from [193.48.225.2] (nou.rez-metz.supelec.fr [193.48.225.2]) by esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id j05FSR106286; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:28:27 +0100 Message-ID: <41DC079A.4060508@altern.org> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:28:26 +0100 From: Gregory Nou User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041130) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Timothy Luoma References: <56BC8436-5E81-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <4469EBCA-5E84-11D9-A810-000A9592DF7A@lanoticia.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Alvaro_J=2E_Gurdi=E1n=22?= cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:28:35 -0000 Timothy Luoma wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Alvaro J. Gurdián wrote: > >> Are you controlling iTunes (and all it's music library) on your Mac >> from a FreeBSD box somewhere on the net, and playing it on the >> FreeBSD box? > > > Oh, there's one big caveat: there's apparently no way to tell iTunes > to look for a iTunes server, it does it automatically... and I presume > that it would NOT work over the internet, perhaps not even over a > different subnet. > > TjL > Did someone however try to install something like jTunes ? I was wondering installing it, and would have appreciate some tips about it. Anyway, thanks for the tips. -- GN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 15:43:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11B716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:43:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FDD43D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:43:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=[192.168.63.10]) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1CmDK7-0007OI-UG; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:43:48 -0500 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:43:50 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <56BC8436-5E81-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <4469EBCA-5E84-11D9-A810-000A9592DF7A@lanoticia.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200501050943.50806.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc2c3f4a473b2cf52b956d9048f3c440de350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 cc: "Alvaro J. =?iso-8859-1?q?Gurdi=E1n?=" cc: Timothy Luoma Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:43:48 -0000 On Tuesday 04 January 2005 07:48 pm, Timothy Luoma wrote: > On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Alvaro J. Gurdi=E1n wrote: > > Are you controlling iTunes (and all it's music library) on your > > Mac from a FreeBSD box somewhere on the net, and playing it on the > > FreeBSD box? > > Oh, there's one big caveat: there's apparently no way to tell iTunes > to look for a iTunes server, it does it automatically... and I > presume that it would NOT work over the internet, perhaps not even > over a different subnet. > > TjL You could share a music directory via webdav. Doesn't Mac OSX supports=20 webdav by default? Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 16:08:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F4C16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:08:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.50.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5997843D39 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (localhost.uwaterloo.ca [127.0.0.1]) j05G8MAG070973; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: (from www@localhost) by ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j05G8MPF070972; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca: www set sender to bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca using -f Received: from 129.97.50.50 ( [129.97.50.50])HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1104941302.41dc10f6a1e9b@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:22 -0500 From: Bruce Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104221531.GA70844@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104892047.41db508f4c7f4@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050105045329.GA77072@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104932867.41dbf003405b1@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <1104932867.41dbf003405b1@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 / FreeBSD-4.6.2 X-Originating-IP: 129.97.50.50 Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow - traced to getpwnam maybe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:08:21 -0000 Quoting Bruce Campbell : > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:27:27PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote: > > > > > I wrote a small program: > > > > > > #include > > > #include > > > > > > main( int argc, char *argv[] ) > > > { > > > getpwuid( 13076 ); > > > } > > > > > > and ran it under truss on 5.x and it generated 178,711 lines of output. > > > (the bulk of which is those lseek/read calls as above) It looks like the overhaul of getpwent Apr/2003 to make it thread safe: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c may be the problem. I've tested the dbm_fetch function independently on a large file, and it is fine. I've opened a bug report, and plan to build a replacement 4.x mail server, as the most deterministic path to restoring adequate e-mail service to our users. Can anyone suggest a workaround ? -- Bruce Campbell Engineering Computing CPH-2374B University of Waterloo (519)888-4567 ext 5889 ---------------------------------------- This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 16:17:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D740D16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:17:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout.ie-online.it (mercurio.ie-online.it [193.27.202.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3474943D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:17:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sriva@gufi.org) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20050105171737.0090dcf0@civetta.gufi.org> X-Sender: riva@civetta.gufi.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:17:37 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Stefano Riva Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Problem with an USB-RS232 Prolific adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:17:39 -0000 Hi. I'm trying to use an Hamlet XURS232 (Prolific PL-2303) USB-RS232 adapter with 5.3-RELEASE-p3. Uplcom/ucom are compiled in the kernel and the host correctly sees the dongle booting up. No problem with usbdevs -v. I get /dev/ucom0. HOST A (ucom0) <> XURS232 <> HOST B (sio0) By adding "ucom0:dv=/dev/ucom0:br#9600:pa=none:" to /etc/remote on A, then running tip on both hosts, I can transfer data from B to A but not the other way. I tried using other software like minicom, playing with stty and so on.. same behaviour: B doesn't receives/shows what A tries to send. The link doesn't work even if I connect B to a DCE like a modem. Cable is OK because everything works like a charm if I simply use sio0 instead of ucom0 on A. Adapter is OK because it works well connected to a Windows host. Am i missing something? P.S. Yes, I know that things changed in CURRENT (for example "standard" tty/cua devices instead of ucom).. no, I can't try CURRENT.. ;) -- Stefano Riva (sriva@gufi.org) Gruppo Utenti FreeBSD Italia - http://www.gufi.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 16:21:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174A616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:21:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED6543D5D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:21:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so162141wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:21:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ugXUNXgqYgNYHiF4PniUSM5cD+0rzEKwTtzPDNWz0Lh2Nbe3Lh4Hs3E2pmzI59g3BN3AwLOsObOcY91Elgp2x7z3c4E6h9MA8SZ3qbQ0PsyoZxSjvHk050a+NEvBFujZJCI8VudukeEl8v0WD/FTFSVFrnrGRgVRKSlQZ+H7srU= Received: by 10.54.28.78 with SMTP id b78mr358846wrb; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:21:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:21:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:21:18 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Curtis Almond In-Reply-To: <92b67e1b050104152322d7beac@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <92b67e1b050104152322d7beac@mail.gmail.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: install.cfg disklabel customization question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:21:20 -0000 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:23:05 -0600, Curtis Almond wrote: > I would like to be able to do the following > > 1. Create a / partition of x size > 2. Create a swap partition of x size > 3. Create a /usr partition of x size > 4. Create a ufs partition of the rest of the disk but it is not mounted at boot. > > What I have thus far is: > # label disk 1 > # IDE > ad0s2-1=ufs 3969000 / > ad0s2-2=swap 3969000 none > ad0s2-3=ufs 3969000 /usr > ad0s2-4=ufs 0 /usr100 > > Anyone know how to make /usr100 not mounted at boot time? Don't put it in /etc/fstab. Then you can use mount(8) to mount it when you need to. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 16:31:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D852816A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:31:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net (ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net [166.102.165.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6380043D54 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:31:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trey@fastmail.fm) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [69.40.74.131]) by ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net with ESMTP <20050105163117.HREN10027.ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net@[192.168.0.2]> for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:31:17 -0600 From: Trey Sizemore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1104715334.806.11.camel@localhost> References: <1104696792.806.6.camel@localhost> <1104715334.806.11.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:33:02 -0500 Message-Id: <1104942782.794.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Why might my USB devices *not* be detected? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:31:19 -0000 On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 20:22 -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 15:13 -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote: > > > Sorry for replying to myself, but wanted to fix the subject (less > confusing). Might this have something to do with the usbd.conf file > (I've not changed mine, but perhaps something to be added?). > Thanks for the offline and online offers of help that I've received. I'm not sure what changed, but I was troubleshooting with a LiveCD distro which detected the ports and devices correctly. I then copied the /var/log/messages file from this and was going to post to the list, but when I booted into FreeBSD again, the ports were miraculously working! Hmmm...don't know what happened, as I'd rebooted a few times previous to this, but at least it's working now. Thanks again. -- Cheers, Trey --- There is an innocence in admiration; it is found in those to whom it has not yet occurred that they, too, might be admired some day. - Friedrich Nietzsche 11:32AM up 1 day, 16:41, 0 users, load averages: 0.20, 0.08, 0.02 FreeBSD salamander.thesizemores.net 5.3-STABLE i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 16:50:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC90F16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:50:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web61306.mail.yahoo.com (web61306.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D5BC43D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:50:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hardcodeharry@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 89005 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2005 16:50:02 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=lc9q0wIetSq55vHgWVEHbCpt4gDdc6+bVpv1+reZn9LwbIPcQe9XITnK4wMZ9W2ORh4DcG2e/UITjcZXbJJSgCredBy83iVRCrHC0cgIAb+5Zii5ntZKArxr871XpGzcKhYlWPFYus632pNnKmx7q0/Ah7MrMpfnl/P/YjZn1p8= ; Message-ID: <20050105165001.89003.qmail@web61306.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.47.116.25] by web61306.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 08:50:01 PST Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 08:50:01 -0800 (PST) From: Boris Spirialitious To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:50:03 -0000 One system cost me 3 months salary in Russia. Is this how you treat your users? Why can't your developer use the machine they used to make 5.3 work? Everyone tell me to use LINUX. Now I know why. You support bad slow version and not good one. Very stupid people. Boris Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Boris > Spirialitious > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 3:25 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD > > > None of the new Supermicro hardware I've tried works with Freebsd > 4.10 properly. I've seen that this has been reported by others. > They are all based on the 7520 and 7530 Intel chips. 5.3 works > ok, but a 3.4/800 processor on 5.3 is slower than a 3.06/533 > processor on our old 7502 chipset based system with 4.9. What can > be done? Donate one of the systems to a FreeBSD kernel developer. Ted __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 16:56:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC5016A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:56:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freedombi.com (idealso.com [207.179.98.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2A543D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:56:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from charles@idealso.com) Received: by freedombi.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6BD9728F5; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:35:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from freedombi.com (localhost [192.168.10.108]) by freedombi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F91728E3; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:35:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from 24.11.146.21 (SquirrelMail authenticated user charles); by freedombi.com with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:35:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <49600.24.11.146.21.1104942926.squirrel@24.11.146.21> In-Reply-To: <0AAB74E3-5F2E-11D9-BE17-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> References: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <200501050841.03874.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> <0AAB74E3-5F2E-11D9-BE17-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:35:26 -0500 (EST) From: "Charles Ulrich" To: "Timothy Luoma" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on freedombi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: "Donald J. O'Neill" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: modem not responding to mgetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:56:42 -0000 Timothy Luoma said: > This remains all that dmesg shows: > > # dmesg |grep "^sio" > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > > I'm starting to think that my modem (US Robotics that I salvaged from > an old HP I had) isn't detected by FreeBSD on boot. This is true. FreeBSD will recognize a hardware modem as if it were just a serial port and from the looks of it, it's only detecting a single serial port: the external one. (The 9-pin port that you couldn't identify.) You could try disabling the external serial port in the BIOS, but I doubt that would really make a difference. It's possible that you have a software modem (sometimes called a winmodems) which requires special windows-only drivers. One way to find out for sure: google for the model number of the modem plus the word "linux" or "freebsd". You should be able to discover whether it is a hardware or software modem. > If so, would I be > better off getting a new modem that might be recognized? It's a 56k > fax modem, IIRC what WinXP was telling me. (I tried to save $20 by not > buying a modem installed by Dell, and I knew I was going to regret > it...) No, you would have still regretted it. Most PC manufacturers started shipping software modems with their machines in the early 90's and these days the only way to get a hardware modem is to buy one yourself. If you go out to buy an internal modem, make extra certain that it's a hardware modem. I know U.S. Robotics sells them, but you'll probably have to scrutinize the box pretty carefully in order to tell. You may even have to jot down the model numbers and research them at home before making the purchase. Even better, buy an external modem that connects to your serial port. (That's 9-pin serial, not USB.) These are always hardware modems, are a lot easier to debug than the PCI variety, and work with pretty much every operating system that your computer is capable of running. -- Charles Ulrich Ideal Solution, LLC - http://www.idealso.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 17:08:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACE516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:08:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out009.verizon.net (out009pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3276C43D46 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:08:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from FreeBSD@keyslapper.org) Received: from keyslapper.org ([68.163.177.192]) by out009.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050105170804.ZXLY24088.out009.verizon.net@keyslapper.org> for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:04 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E7611C8B for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:08:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from keyslapper.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keyslapper.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14690-01 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:08:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by keyslapper.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 102FB11C6E; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:08:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:08:03 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050105170802.GB4043@keyslapper.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050104170920.GD94265@keyslapper.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keyslapper.org X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out009.verizon.net from [68.163.177.192] at Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:04 -0600 Subject: Re: SpamAssassin-Milter accuracy... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:08:05 -0000 On 01/04/05 08:59 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt sat at the `puter and typed: > > > > > The only problem with doing this is that you have to completely > receive the e-mail message before SA can check it against the > blacklists. > > We do the blacklist checks at the MTA level and turn them off in SA. > As a result the e-mail is never accepted by the server if it's in a > blacklist. As a result of that if the spam is coming from a > compromised mailserver then that mailserver will just requeue the > message. And with everyone on the Internet doing this, it will make > the compromised mailserver melt down immediately, which will punish > the admin of it for running an open mailserver in the first place. Whether this is the "Right Thing To Do" may be debatable, but I think you leave yourself open to rejecting legitimate email on the word of an overzealous blacklister. I read somewhere recently that some lists had been known to blacklist servers simply because their admin was critical of their listing criteria. This is third hand, of course, but you have to accept that blacklists have been compiled with very objective criteria, and usually by overzealous anti-spammers. Even those that have automated criteria often rely on unconfirmed reports to blacklist an IP. Believe me, I'm all for thumping the spammers - and I mean hard. I was giddy when I read the story on the little ISP that was awarded $1 Billion from a spammer that kept their network on its knees for months. Still, it's probably not a good thing to run over innocent pedestrians to get them. I know an open relay isn't necessarily an innocent pedestrian - more like a careless admin, but they're still being victimized by the spammer too. Not to say you shouldn't reject spam, but there are more reliable ways, like amavis-new, which will check the message through SpamAssassin, and reject at the MTA it if the threshold is high enough. It may be a little more load on your MTA, but you're rejecting email because it's spam, not because someone has blackballed the originator. That message still gets requeued on the relay, so the effect is still an overloaded server. I tried Amavis-new for SA checks at one point, and it works very nicely. I turned the spam checking off because I didn't like that it was using global configs and preferences - I prefer per-user settings because my mother and wife are signed up for mailings that set off a lot of SA flags. My Bayes DB is much better trained than theirs, and I've got my threshold much lower (I use 2.0 with maybe 1 FP & < 20 FNs per 100,000 messages). Not to say you can't rescan, or just resort based on the score assigned through amavisd, but I'm more inclined to put it aside and make darn sure it's spam myself. So Amavis scans email through the virus tools and leaves Spam checking to Procmail and SA. > > I do use the blackholes (check http://blackholes.us) at the MTA, > > since rejecting mail outright from Asian (and a few African) > > countries has reduced my spam intake by about 80%, without > > reducing my legitimate mail by a single message. Since I'm not > > running a service for other people, and I carefully choose the > > blackhole domains I use, it's not a problem for me. Of course, > > that may not be an option for you. Someday I'll stop this > > practice, but for now some of my doors are just plain closed. > > > > We don't use blackholes.us although I'll take a look at it. About > 50% of our incoming spam is blocked by the blacklist servers we do > use. I like the blackholes. They have the upside of qualifying simply by their country of origin. They also have the downside of qualifying simply because of their country of origin. If you use them, you can be fairly certain that you are only refusing connections - all connections - from the country you intended. The criteria is much more concrete than the blacklists, and the lists are much more stable. As I mentioned, I don't have acquaintances and don't do business with anyone in Asia, so I feel fine simply not accepting email from the biggest source of my spam. When I turned them back on with my new server, my spam instantly went down by 75%. That's after using them on my domains for over 2 years, and running my new server without them for a few weeks. Had I kept them off longer, I have no doubt the stream would have increased - when I turned them on 2 years ago, my spam went down by almost 95% in a matter of minutes, and over the years the stream of rejects has diminished slowly. Lou -- Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD@keyslapper.org Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org Ô¿Ô¬ White dwarf seeks red giant for binary relationship. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 17:20:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9289116A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:20:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1145443D60; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:20:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005010517204601100fetdte>; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:20:50 +0000 Message-ID: <41DC21DF.30801@computer.org> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:20:31 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: FreeBSD mobile Mailing List Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:20:52 -0000 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number > of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. > Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me > good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal > wireless card to work? > > Greg FWIW I think the 1150 ships with either a truemobile 1350 or 1450 (your choice). It's my understanding (from a quick google) that those are still broadcom devices. I had a Truemobile 1300 (Broadcom), and had to use NDISulator to get it running. That was with 5.2.1. Haven't looked into it much but I think NDIS is built into the kernel now?? Not sure. My point is... you may have to use the windows drivers with a wrapper to get it to work. It worked well... but I was running from windows to begin with. On the other hand... I've switched to an Atheros based miniPCI card which works quite well with 'device ath'. I can give you a link if your interested. So you might dig around and try to find out positively whose card those miniPCI devices are. HTH -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 17:22:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9098516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (MS05.mailstreet2003.net [63.251.155.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C1343D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:23:52 -0500 Message-ID: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2202DB64B6@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD Thread-Index: AcTzRttEVEnvBUlqQwKp1PYQoPg2wAAA3S4g From: "Haulmark, Chris" To: "Boris Spirialitious" , Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:22:58 -0000 Someone broke the silence:=20 > One system cost me 3 months salary in Russia. Is this how you > treat your users? Why can't your developer use the machine they used > to make 5.3 work?=20 >=20 Yes, I know things are expensive. So are the rewards. Would it be = worth it? The reason that Ted asked for a donation of the server is because = apparently none of them have access to one to make FreeBSD work properly = on this particular system architecture. Ted's request is not the only = thing that can be done. You can even loan for a certain period of time = if you wish. The time period would have to be sufficent enough for the = developers. The developers can reward you (support for FreeBSD) if you give them = something (donation money, parts, gimmericks). That is why you got a = free OS. > Everyone tell me to use LINUX. Now I know why. You support > bad slow version and not good one. Very stupid people. >=20 FreeBSD is more organized and managed more professionally compared to = many of the Linux distrubtion organizations. That is why anyone will = tell you to use anything except $THAT. The FreeBSD development seems slow compared to Linux development for = numberous of reasons. I cannot and will not name them except for one. = We go for quality...not bleeding edge (I did that first!..but it's = broken after few days). Everyone in the world is stupid...no perfect smart human exists. :) Chris > Boris >=20 > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >=20 >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Boris >> Spirialitious Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 3:25 PM >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD >>=20 >>=20 >> None of the new Supermicro hardware I've tried works with Freebsd >> 4.10 properly. I've seen that this has been reported by others. >> They are all based on the 7520 and 7530 Intel chips. 5.3 works >> ok, but a 3.4/800 processor on 5.3 is slower than a 3.06/533 >> processor on our old 7502 chipset based system with 4.9. What can >> be done? >=20 > Donate one of the systems to a FreeBSD kernel developer. >=20 > Ted >=20 >=20 > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 17:56:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A1316A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:56:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.50.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9805E43D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:56:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (localhost.uwaterloo.ca [127.0.0.1]) j05HugAG080639; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:56:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: (from www@localhost) by ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j05Hugt5080638; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:56:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca: www set sender to bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca using -f Received: from 129.97.50.50 ( [129.97.50.50])HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:56:42 -0500 Message-ID: <1104947802.41dc2a5aa6c62@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:56:42 -0500 From: Bruce Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104221531.GA70844@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104892047.41db508f4c7f4@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050105045329.GA77072@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104932867.41dbf003405b1@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <1104941302.41dc10f6a1e9b@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <1104941302.41dc10f6a1e9b@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 / FreeBSD-4.6.2 X-Originating-IP: 129.97.50.50 Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow - traced to getpwnam maybe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:56:44 -0000 Quoting Bruce Campbell : > Quoting Bruce Campbell : > > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 09:27:27PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote: > > > > > > > I wrote a small program: > > > > > > > > #include > > > > #include > > > > > > > > main( int argc, char *argv[] ) > > > > { > > > > getpwuid( 13076 ); > > > > } > > > > > > > > and ran it under truss on 5.x and it generated 178,711 lines of output. > > > > (the bulk of which is those lseek/read calls as above) > > It looks like the overhaul of getpwent Apr/2003 to make it thread safe: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c > > may be the problem. > > I've tested the dbm_fetch function independently on a large > file, and it is fine. > > I've opened a bug report, and plan to build a replacement 4.x > mail server, as the most deterministic path to restoring > adequate e-mail service to our users. > > Can anyone suggest a workaround ? Well, somewhat unbelievably, copying a getpwent.c from 4.7 and remaking libc on 5.3 with it worked. Load average has gone from 70 to 2. And, so that this qualifies as a question... Am I crazy to pull an old getpwnam from 4.7 and blindly build it on 5.3 ? -- Bruce Campbell Engineering Computing CPH-2374B University of Waterloo (519)888-4567 ext 5889 ---------------------------------------- This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 18:06:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4537416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:06:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m23.mx.aol.com (imo-m23.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C365343D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:06:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id 8.145.3c7fa780 (1320); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:06:37 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <145.3c7fa780.2f0d86ad@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:06:37 EST To: chris@sigd.net MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:06:46 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 12:23:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, chris@sigd.net writes: >> Everyone tell me to use LINUX. Now I know why. You support >> bad slow version and not good one. Very stupid people. >> >FreeBSD is more organized and managed more professionally compared to many >of the Linux distrubtion organizations. That is why anyone will tell you to use >anything except $THAT. > >The FreeBSD development seems slow compared to Linux development for >numberous of reasons. I cannot and will not name them except for one. We go >for quality...not bleeding edge (I did that first!..but it's broken after few days). > >Everyone in the world is stupid...no perfect smart human exists. :) > >Chris Do you really believe that Chris? Its not about being "slow". Its about everyone being focused on the "new" version while ignoring needs for the only version suitable for production. It would be fine that 5.x is taking way longer than expected, and that the performance is well below what was promised, if 4.x was being supported as the mainstream version. The truth is that if someone in the linux camp needed a MB they'd call supermicro or Dell and get one the next day. Apparently FreeBSD doesn't have that kind of pull. If the FreeBSD foundation doesnt have $250. to support a mainstream chipset used by the world's 2 largest manufacturers, or you don't have a corporate sponsor with a single Dell machine to loan for a few days, then it says something about your "organization", or lack thereof. Linux also doesnt do a major release until its arguably better than the previous version. Another lesson that the FreeBSD camp could well learn from. You do your tweaking in the confines of your labs, not at the expense of your customer base.. "Stupid" is a choice. Its easily correctable if you ever get out of your state of denial and stop acting like a bunch of overaged college kids.Come to tems with the fact the 5.x is a year away and don't leave the base thats gotten you to where you are in the lurch. TM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 18:20:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFED16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:20:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A4743D64 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:20:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j05IHZB4021566; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:17:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC2FF2.2010303@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:20:34 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tm4528@aol.com References: <145.3c7fa780.2f0d86ad@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <145.3c7fa780.2f0d86ad@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: chris@sigd.net cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:20:45 -0000 Tm4528@aol.com wrote: >Linux also doesnt do a major release until its arguably better than the >previous version. Another lesson that the FreeBSD camp could well learn from. You do >your tweaking in the confines of your labs, not at the expense of your >customer base.. > I'm sorry ... I missed something. What exactly was the "major" arguably "better" difference between RedHat 8 and RedHat 9? I got the distinct impression RedHat was playing the version number game with SuSE and Mandrake. Or how about RedHat 7.2 to 7.3? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 18:24:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D217B16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:24:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp15.wxs.nl (smtp15.wxs.nl [195.121.6.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED2543D31; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:24:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from ZGISH (ip3e833f72.speed.planet.nl [62.131.63.114]) by smtp15.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9U006UUWGJNC@smtp15.wxs.nl>; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:24:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:24:27 +0100 From: Kiffin Gish In-reply-to: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> To: 'Greg 'groggy' Lehey' , 'FreeBSD mobile Mailing List' , 'FreeBSD Questions' Message-id: <005301c4f353$ca9c90f0$9900000a@ZGISH> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal Subject: RE: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:24:21 -0000 I've been the happy owner of a Dell Inspiron 8200 with a TrueMobile wireless card. Dual boot Windows/XP and FreeBSD 5.3, and so far never had any major issues. Hope this helps... -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > mobile@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Greg 'groggy' Lehey > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 07:23 > To: FreeBSD mobile Mailing List; FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? > > I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number > of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. > Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me > good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal > wireless card to work? > > Greg > -- > See complete headers for address and phone numbers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 18:53:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE9F16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:53:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from iwmail.infoworld.com (iwmail.infoworld.com [64.95.97.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E46243D5A; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:53:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Paul_Krill@infoworld.com) To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: From: Paul Krill Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on IWMAIL/IWP(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 01/05/2005 10:53:08 AM, Serialize complete at 01/05/2005 10:53:08 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:53:08 -0000 This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 18:58:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B1A16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:58:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B70443D3F; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:58:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697584239; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:59:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10873-02; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:59:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6A34218; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:59:28 +0100 (CET) From: "Jorn Argelo" To: Paul Krill , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:59:28 +0100 Message-Id: <20050105185915.M98377@wcborstel.nl> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 82.161.134.53 (jorn) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.wcborstel.nl Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:58:57 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800, Paul Krill wrote > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. Where did you get this information? _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:01:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A58D16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:01:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from iwmail.infoworld.com (iwmail.infoworld.com [64.95.97.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326943D39; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:01:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Paul_Krill@infoworld.com) In-Reply-To: <20050105185915.M98377@wcborstel.nl> To: "Jorn Argelo" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: From: Paul Krill Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:22 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on IWMAIL/IWP(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 01/05/2005 11:01:24 AM, Serialize complete at 01/05/2005 11:01:24 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: glewis@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:01:24 -0000 I was doing some browsing on the Web, looking for something else, and bumped into this. It seems like a lot of people already know. "Jorn Argelo" 01/05/2005 10:59 AM To: Paul Krill , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org cc: Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800, Paul Krill wrote > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. Where did you get this information? _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:04:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FAA16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:04:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DD243D45 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:04:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 35D93519EB; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:04:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:04:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Heinrich Rebehn Message-ID: <20050105190455.GA1566@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41DC0714.2000408@ant.uni-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DC0714.2000408@ant.uni-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cam_simq_alloc undefined X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:04:27 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:26:12PM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > Hi list, >=20 > i use 5.3-RELEASE-p2. > When i try to load module iir for my ICP raid controller, i get: >=20 > root@antsrv1 [~] # kldload iir > kldload: can't load iir: No such file or directory > root@antsrv1 [~] # >=20 > dmesg shows that 'cam_simq_alloc' is undefined. However, module cam.ko,= =20 > which exports cam_simq_alloc is loaded: >=20 > root@antsrv1 [~] # kldstat > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 4 0xc0400000 37a5b0 kernel > 2 14 0xc077b000 537f0 acpi.ko > 3 1 0xc37f1000 31000 cam.ko > root@antsrv1 [~] # > root@antsrv1 [/boot/kernel] # nm cam.ko|grep cam_simq_alloc > 0000e70c T cam_simq_alloc > root@antsrv1 [/boot/kernel] # >=20 > What am i missing here? >=20 > I need to load the scsi stuff as modules, because otherwise i have to=20 > reboot after every change to the raid controller's configuration (which= =20 > i am playing with ATM). Or is there another way to have the kernel=20 > rescan the raid controller for disks? camcontrol rescan? ;) Kris --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3DpXWry0BWjoQKURAh1KAJ95ahdYGznLGDGRQe/TdrihF3ogUgCgyewP oFohPDpti+UXRLA8BaeuMh8= =MRk8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:05:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7968B16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:05:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF4B43D55 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:05:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so185994wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:05:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=K0PEKVNE6VywsHQornGQaBnGsOGgo3gTWJjVr9PR0xHU1EZvU5IFKsAe7KZyRmoebxzNfHQEKhcKGW+KLB4GHom0an9xNKYM/5XVtT07gx0zTKcF6eRR1CK64d99eWv+i8p1ZRKzjTmhBxer/NXtveiOxpcefdvqcegdkPT6mFc= Received: by 10.54.42.41 with SMTP id p41mr244936wrp; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:05:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:05:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:05:03 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Paul Krill In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050105185915.M98377@wcborstel.nl> cc: Jorn Argelo cc: glewis@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:05:04 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:22 -0800, Paul Krill wrote: > I was doing some browsing on the Web, looking for something else, and > bumped into this. It seems like a lot of people already know. > > "Jorn Argelo" > 01/05/2005 10:59 AM > > To: Paul Krill , > freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org > cc: > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800, Paul Krill wrote > > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. > > Where did you get this information? What information? This post is very lacking in details. What is it? If you're the poster, what's your point? Why -questions? If it's just something I don't "get", please clue me in. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:07:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0348716A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:07:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C926743D46; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:07:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0ED72519EB; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:08 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Krill Message-ID: <20050105190808.GB1566@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: glewis@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:07:40 -0000 --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:53:07AM -0800, Paul Krill wrote: > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with=20 > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 or=20 > email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks.=20 Try talking to bod@freebsdfoundation.org - this is the organisation who has been dealing with sun and sponsoring the freebsd java development. Kris --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3DsYWry0BWjoQKURAkNmAKDz+2Sh0tx9pkDI+mQtl2YflTf2NQCgqBA5 W5nrxgpBpiI9c7HHkkSiKRs= =FiDW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:08:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCFE16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:08:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E982943D45; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:08:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1644C5333C; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:44 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Joshua Lokken Message-ID: <20050105190843.GC1566@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050105185915.M98377@wcborstel.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Jorn Argelo cc: glewis@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Paul Krill Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:08:15 -0000 --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:05:03PM -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:22 -0800, Paul Krill = wrote: > > I was doing some browsing on the Web, looking for something else, and > > bumped into this. It seems like a lot of people already know. > >=20 > > "Jorn Argelo" > > 01/05/2005 10:59 AM > >=20 > > To: Paul Krill , > > freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org > > cc: > > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > >=20 > >=20 > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800, Paul Krill wrote > > > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > > > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > > > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. > >=20 > > Where did you get this information? >=20 > What information? This post is very lacking in details. What is it? > If you're the poster, what's your point? Why -questions? > If it's just something I don't "get", please clue me in. http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/press/20041221-newsletter.shtml Kris --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3Ds6Wry0BWjoQKURAvPwAKC6WP3+0ixUyCa1N/I3MNJLeWYQfQCdEF57 Um2lcEWRGnX4aXWYp7aUZx4= =8YLE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Fig2xvG2VGoz8o/s-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:09:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE8216A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:09:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from keltset.simon1ltd.com (keltset.simon1ltd.com [216.194.67.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB3D43D1D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:09:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon1@keltset.simon1ltd.com) Received: from keltset.simon1ltd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j05J9a0O028735; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:09:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (simon1@localhost)j05J9as2028732; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:09:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:09:36 -0500 (EST) From: Simon1 To: Joshua Lokken In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20050105185915.M98377@wcborstel.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:09:37 -0000 > > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. > Where did you get this information? http://www.javalobby.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=16511 http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/press/20041221-newsletter.shtml It seems pretty clear that Paul is attempting to do some sort of story on this. Why here? Well.. -questions would seem be a general place to .. ask questions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:13:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C815516A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:13:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from iwmail.infoworld.com (iwmail.infoworld.com [64.95.97.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAFD43D2D; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Paul_Krill@infoworld.com) In-Reply-To: <20050105190808.GB1566@xor.obsecurity.org> To: Kris Kennaway MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: From: Paul Krill Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:13:06 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on IWMAIL/IWP(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 01/05/2005 11:13:08 AM Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_mixed 0069914B88256F80_=" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: glewis@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:13:08 -0000 --=_mixed 0069914B88256F80_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Do you have any contact information as to who I would speak to at FreeBSDfoundation? Thanks. Kris Kennaway 01/05/2005 11:08 AM To: Paul Krill cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:53:07AM -0800, Paul Krill wrote: > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 or > email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. Try talking to bod@freebsdfoundation.org - this is the organisation who has been dealing with sun and sponsoring the freebsd java development. Kris --=_mixed 0069914B88256F80_= Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="attqjpqb.dat" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="attqjpqb.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0NClZlcnNpb246IEdudVBHIHYxLjIuNiAoRnJl ZUJTRCkNCg0KaUQ4REJRRkIzRHNZV3J5MEJXam9RS1VSQWtObUFLRHorMlNoMHR4OXBrREkrbVF0 bDJZZmxUZjJOUUNncUJBNQ0KVzVucnhncEJwaUk5YzdISGtrU2lLUnM9DQo9RmlEVw0KLS0tLS1F TkQgUEdQIFNJR05BVFVSRS0tLS0tDQo= --=_mixed 0069914B88256F80_=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:14:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01FF16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:14:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from iwmail.infoworld.com (iwmail.infoworld.com [64.95.97.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB92843D2F; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:14:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Paul_Krill@infoworld.com) In-Reply-To: To: Joshua Lokken MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: From: Paul Krill Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:14:10 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on IWMAIL/IWP(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 01/05/2005 11:14:12 AM, Serialize complete at 01/05/2005 11:14:12 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: Jorn Argelo cc: glewis@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:14:13 -0000 I am a writer with Infoworld magazine and would like to speak with someone at FreeBSD regarding these issues with Sun, for a possible story. I will be contacting Sun as well. Here are some links I am following up on here: http://www.javalobby.org/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=16511&tstart=0 http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/press/20041221-newsletter.shtml (scroll down to Java Update) Joshua Lokken 01/05/2005 11:05 AM Please respond to Joshua Lokken To: Paul Krill cc: Jorn Argelo , glewis@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:22 -0800, Paul Krill wrote: > I was doing some browsing on the Web, looking for something else, and > bumped into this. It seems like a lot of people already know. > > "Jorn Argelo" > 01/05/2005 10:59 AM > > To: Paul Krill , > freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org > cc: > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800, Paul Krill wrote > > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. > > Where did you get this information? What information? This post is very lacking in details. What is it? If you're the poster, what's your point? Why -questions? If it's just something I don't "get", please clue me in. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:20:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA62916A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:20:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4FC43D46; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:20:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAF9751354; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:21:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:21:03 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Krill Message-ID: <20050105192103.GA13906@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050105190808.GB1566@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: glewis@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:20:35 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:13:06AM -0800, Paul Krill wrote: > Do you have any contact information as to who I would speak to at=20 > FreeBSDfoundation? Thanks.=20 Whoever responds to your mail to bod@FreeBSDFoundation.org :-) Putting on my telepathy beanie, it could be Robert Watson. Kris --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3D4fWry0BWjoQKURAiLBAJsHasDqxVPkacPO2RAzlJBUxoDEZwCgr5A4 V6Mvr+v6tEoy2o5KnWexfpg= =zouU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:26:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1564616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:26:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mci-mail.nodes.net.ad-flow.com (mci-mail.nodes.net.ad-flow.com [66.48.68.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B43643D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:26:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@danielquinn.org) Received: from douglas ([66.59.162.146]) (authenticated)j05JNQd20026 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:23:26 GMT Exocomm-Delivery-Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:23:26 GMT Exocomm-URL: www.exocomm.com From: daniel quinn To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:25:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501051425.28386.freebsd@danielquinn.org> Subject: live/install cd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:26:18 -0000 i've been asked by my company to put together a basic cd that can install a basic freebsd5 system just by putting in the disc and turning it on. it'd have to have a base number of packages and be configured for networking etc at bootup etc. but here's the problem. i'm a gentoo-linux guy. i'm still very new to bsd and i'm running circles trying to figure out what i'm supposed to be looking at for this. i found the livecd in ports, but i *think* it's made for freebsd4 since the livecd.sh keeps failing when trying to copy certain files from the cd, so i'm still lost. is this a common thing? is there a howto i should be looking at? am i on the right track with the livecd? input is greatly appreciated. -- Patron: That girl is a witch! Mal: Yeah, but she's our witch. So cut her the hell down. - Firefly, "Safe" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:26:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FDC16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:26:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from frogman.motivity.ca (frogman.motivity.ca [64.235.96.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9BC43D45 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:26:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vances@frogman.motivity.ca) Received: from frogman.motivity.ca (localhost.motivity.ca [127.0.0.1]) by frogman.motivity.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j05JQK1d078816; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:26:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from vances@frogman.motivity.ca) Received: (from vances@localhost) by frogman.motivity.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j05JQKDP078815; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:26:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from vances) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:26:20 -0500 From: Vance Shipley To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050105192620.GA78787@frogman.motivity.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Motivity Telecom Inc. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Subject: dhclient problem: send_packet: Network is unreachable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:26:25 -0000 Folks, I am having a problem using dhclient under FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE. feeble# /sbin/dhclient -v rl0 Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.1 Copyright 2004 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/products/DHCP Listening on BPF/rl0/00:00:21:ef:1d:a0 Sending on BPF/rl0/00:00:21:ef:1d:a0 Sending on Socket/fallback DHCPREQUEST on rl0 to 192.168.113.1 port 67 send_packet: Network is unreachable send_packet: please consult README file regarding broadcast address. DHCPDISCOVER on rl0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 7 DHCPOFFER from 192.168.113.1 DHCPREQUEST on rl0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 DHCPACK from 192.168.113.1 bound to 192.168.113.126 -- renewal in 1621 seconds. It ends up getting a lease however when it expires it gets another one and never renews the existing lease. This cause the IP address of the machine to change periodically causing connections to fail. This client workstation is on an ethernet which is directly attached to another FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE machine which is acting as a bridge and wireless access point. The other two machines work fine. rt +------------+ | 5.3-STABLE +--- ath0 802.11b +-+----+-----+ sis1 | | sis2 +----------------+ | | rl0 | | | wi0 +------+-----+ +------+-----+ +------+------+ | 5.3-STABLE | | Solaris 8 | | 4.10-STABLE | +------------+ +------------+ +-------------+ feeble On the rt machine running 5.3-STABLE I am using bridge(4) to make the sis1 and sis2 ethernet interfaces bridged with the 802.11b interface ath0 which is assigned ip address 192.168.113.1. On the feeble workstation running 5.3-STABLE I see the following in the syslog periodically: arp: 192.168.113.1 moved from 00:00:24:c1:56:25 to 00:02:6f:20:38:4a on rl0 The first mac address in the above is sis1 and the latter ath0. Much less often I see the same message with the mac addresses reversed. On the rt machine running 5.3-STABLE I see the following in the debug log: dhcpd: ICMP Echo reply while lease 192.168.113.125 valid. And in the syslog: dhcpd: Abandoning IP address 192.168.113.125: pinged before offer I have looked at the README file regarding broadcast address as is suggested in the message above however it has no specific notes for FreeBSD on this subject. I tried added a host route to 255.255.255.255 however it didn't seem to have any effect. Anybody have any idea what I can do to fix this? -Vance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:29:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219A216A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:29:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979C243D1D; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:29:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j05JT4j29378; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:29:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Paul Krill" , "Joshua Lokken" Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:29:04 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: Jorn Argelo cc: glewis@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:29:24 -0000 Hi Paul, Hey, good luck to you! The basic root of the problem as I understand it is that Sun license for the JDK 1.3 originally prevented redistribution of the JDK with the FreeBSD which is something that the Project wanted to be able to do for obvious reasons. As a result the FreeBSD Foundation worked with Sun to make some modifications to the Sun license to allow this, as a result the JDK 1.3 can now be redistributed. Unfortunately with the newer JDKs Sun once again changed the licensing terms and the original people at Sun who came up to speed to understand the issues are no longer there, and there's a new set of people there in charge of this who are more busy with bigger fish to fry. It's of course quite legal for end users to download the JDK directly from Sun and compile it on FreeBSD themselves and then use it. There's no shortage of development time available to get the newer JDK's working on the latest FreeBSD versions and many people have already done so. The problem is in the licensing issues. If you puruse the Sun website the licensing terms are quite vague on Java as it is and half of them don't reconcile with public statements that various Sun officials have made at one time or another. I think there is a story there for you but more along the lines of: "Sun's wishy-washy licensing terms driving people away from Java" along with a story about how it pretty much takes a tema of expert lawyers to figure out if a business is in compliance with Sun's terms or not - and even then you don't know if Sun is going to come after you for royalty payments or not at some point in the future. Just try reading the many Sun licenses for Java off their website and try to imagine where a typical high tech company would fall in and you will see what I mean. Ted Mittelstaedt Author: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide. Addison-Wesley, 2000. tedm@toybox.placo.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Paul Krill > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:14 AM > To: Joshua Lokken > Cc: Jorn Argelo; glewis@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > I am a writer with Infoworld magazine and would like to speak > with someone > at FreeBSD regarding these issues with Sun, for a possible story. I will > be contacting Sun as well. Here are some links I am following up on here: > > http://www.javalobby.org/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=16511&tstart=0 > > http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/press/20041221-newsletter.shtml (scroll > down to Java Update) > > > > Joshua Lokken > 01/05/2005 11:05 AM > Please respond to Joshua Lokken > > To: Paul Krill > cc: Jorn Argelo , glewis@freebsd.org, > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:22 -0800, Paul Krill > wrote: > > I was doing some browsing on the Web, looking for something else, and > > bumped into this. It seems like a lot of people already know. > > > > "Jorn Argelo" > > 01/05/2005 10:59 AM > > > > To: Paul Krill , > > freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org > > cc: > > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800, Paul Krill wrote > > > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > > > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > > > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. > > > > Where did you get this information? > > What information? This post is very lacking in details. What is it? > If you're the poster, what's your point? Why -questions? > If it's just something I don't "get", please clue me in. > > > -- > Joshua Lokken > Open Source Advocate > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:37:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9066716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:37:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BCB43D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:37:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.214]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9U00DUEZUTY1D0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml6so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.150]) by pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9U00CYKZUTYSF0@pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 (MST) Received: from procyon.nekulturny.org (S0106000c41b2b9a3.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.45.143]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I9U00M2MZUTHQ@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 From: Danny MacMillan In-reply-to: <200501050413.j054DuOB019702@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: Scott Bennett Message-id: <20050105193741.GA847@procyon.nekulturny.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <200501050413.j054DuOB019702@mp.cs.niu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: parv@pair.com Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:37:42 -0000 On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:13:56PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:21:06 -0500 Parv wrote: > > >in message <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu>, > >wrote Scott Bennett thusly... > >> > >> I've downloaded the following ISO image files: > >> > >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso > >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso > >> > >> I've also tried burning the first file to CD-Rs using Windows XP > >> Home's own facilities and using Sonic RecordNow! under said > >> system, but did not get bootable CDs either way. > > > >First time i tried the software of same name unknown version (IBM > >ThinkPad T42, Windows XP Professional), i selected "Data Disc" and > >chose the ISO image. Well, it did do its job: i got the ISO image > >/file/ on the CD. > > > >After more poking around in the software interface, "Burn Image" or > >some such option was revealed under the heading of "Data Disc" or > >some such. And, that too did its job: i got the mini install ISO > >image on CD to boot with. > > > Thanks for the suggestion. I've now gone back and found the > little green button in Sonic RecordNow! for making a bootable CD. I > then tried it with each of the first two files noted above. The CDs > written via the green button do get a little farther than before. > In the earlier case, the machine barely glanced at the CD before > deciding to boot from the hard drive after all. The green button > CDs, instead, run far enough to display a message in the upper left > corner of the screen that says, "Missing operating system", and then > hang. This is not intuitive, but you do not want to use the "make a bootable CD" function of Sonic RecordNow! to make a bootable CD. The ISO files you downloaded are disc images that are already bootable. If you burn a faithful reproduction of the image onto a CD, the CD will be bootable. The way to do that is to burn the image to disc as an image, not as a file. Most CD burning software have an option like "burn image to disc". For example, Nero Burning ROM SE has this functionality in the Recorder menu under "Burn Image...". I haven't ever used Sonic RecordNow! so I don't know where the option is (or even if it has one, though Parv's comments above would suggest that it does). If it doesn't, you are going to need to use some other software because burning the image to disc is the only way you will get the outcome you want. -- Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:38:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D591816A4CF; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:38:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from iwmail.infoworld.com (iwmail.infoworld.com [64.95.97.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3229A43D3F; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:38:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Paul_Krill@infoworld.com) In-Reply-To: To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: From: Paul Krill Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:37:56 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on IWMAIL/IWP(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 01/05/2005 11:38:04 AM, Serialize complete at 01/05/2005 11:38:04 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: Jorn Argelo cc: glewis@freebsd.org cc: Joshua Lokken cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:38:05 -0000 Thank you very much for your help. I had some follow-up questions. * For background, FreeBSD wants to distribute the JDK with the FreeBSD OS? FreeBSD's implementation of specific Java technologies? Both? * Which version of the JDK has FreeBSD been prevented from redistributing? Are there cost issues involved? * Please state your specific affiliation with FreeBSD. "Ted Mittelstaedt" 01/05/2005 11:29 AM To: "Paul Krill" , "Joshua Lokken" cc: "Jorn Argelo" , , Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java Hi Paul, Hey, good luck to you! The basic root of the problem as I understand it is that Sun license for the JDK 1.3 originally prevented redistribution of the JDK with the FreeBSD which is something that the Project wanted to be able to do for obvious reasons. As a result the FreeBSD Foundation worked with Sun to make some modifications to the Sun license to allow this, as a result the JDK 1.3 can now be redistributed. Unfortunately with the newer JDKs Sun once again changed the licensing terms and the original people at Sun who came up to speed to understand the issues are no longer there, and there's a new set of people there in charge of this who are more busy with bigger fish to fry. It's of course quite legal for end users to download the JDK directly from Sun and compile it on FreeBSD themselves and then use it. There's no shortage of development time available to get the newer JDK's working on the latest FreeBSD versions and many people have already done so. The problem is in the licensing issues. If you puruse the Sun website the licensing terms are quite vague on Java as it is and half of them don't reconcile with public statements that various Sun officials have made at one time or another. I think there is a story there for you but more along the lines of: "Sun's wishy-washy licensing terms driving people away from Java" along with a story about how it pretty much takes a tema of expert lawyers to figure out if a business is in compliance with Sun's terms or not - and even then you don't know if Sun is going to come after you for royalty payments or not at some point in the future. Just try reading the many Sun licenses for Java off their website and try to imagine where a typical high tech company would fall in and you will see what I mean. Ted Mittelstaedt Author: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide. Addison-Wesley, 2000. tedm@toybox.placo.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Paul Krill > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:14 AM > To: Joshua Lokken > Cc: Jorn Argelo; glewis@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > I am a writer with Infoworld magazine and would like to speak > with someone > at FreeBSD regarding these issues with Sun, for a possible story. I will > be contacting Sun as well. Here are some links I am following up on here: > > http://www.javalobby.org/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=16511&tstart=0 > > http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/press/20041221-newsletter.shtml (scroll > down to Java Update) > > > > Joshua Lokken > 01/05/2005 11:05 AM > Please respond to Joshua Lokken > > To: Paul Krill > cc: Jorn Argelo , glewis@freebsd.org, > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:22 -0800, Paul Krill > wrote: > > I was doing some browsing on the Web, looking for something else, and > > bumped into this. It seems like a lot of people already know. > > > > "Jorn Argelo" > > 01/05/2005 10:59 AM > > > > To: Paul Krill , > > freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org > > cc: > > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800, Paul Krill wrote > > > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > > > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > > > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. > > > > Where did you get this information? > > What information? This post is very lacking in details. What is it? > If you're the poster, what's your point? Why -questions? > If it's just something I don't "get", please clue me in. > > > -- > Joshua Lokken > Open Source Advocate > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:38:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3057C16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:38:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6FF43D45 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:38:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j05JZRq6028041 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:35:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC4232.60804@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:38:26 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20050105165001.89003.qmail@web61306.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050105165001.89003.qmail@web61306.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:38:29 -0000 >One system cost me 3 months salary in Russia. Is this how you treat your users? Why can't your developer use the machine they used to make 5.3 work? > >Everyone tell me to use LINUX. Now I know why. You support bad slow version and not good one. Very stupid people. > Thank you for trolling on an otherwise incredibly useful, civil, polite and helpful list. Now be gone. Back to your Linuxian ways .... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:39:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF0E16A4CF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:39:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com (imo-m25.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4849C43D58 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:39:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id k.12c.5493593e (3310); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:38:51 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <12c.5493593e.2f0d9c4a@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:38:50 EST To: tom@vilot.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:39:05 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 1:20:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, tom@vilot.com writes: >>Linux also doesnt do a major release until its arguably better than the >>previous version. Another lesson that the FreeBSD camp could well learn from. >You do >>your tweaking in the confines of your labs, not at the expense of your >>customer base.. > >I'm sorry ... I missed something. What exactly was the "major" arguably >"better" difference between RedHat 8 and RedHat 9? I got the distinct >impression RedHat was playing the version number game with SuSE and >Mandrake. > >Or how about RedHat 7.2 to 7.3? Yes, you've "missed" the fact that kernels and distributions are independent of one-another in linux. "Redhat" is just a distribution and has little to do with what particular kernel version you are using. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:40:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F0516A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:40:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out014.verizon.net (out014pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD3843D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:40:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from FreeBSD@keyslapper.org) Received: from keyslapper.org ([68.163.177.192]) by out014.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050105194026.MZCO28388.out014.verizon.net@keyslapper.org> for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:40:26 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F5511C97 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:40:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from keyslapper.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keyslapper.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51293-07 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:40:24 -0500 (EST) Received: by keyslapper.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 883A211C5F; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:40:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:40:24 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050105194024.GD4043@keyslapper.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <20050105190808.GB1566@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050105192103.GA13906@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20050105192103.GA13906@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keyslapper.org X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out014.verizon.net from [68.163.177.192] at Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:40:26 -0600 Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:40:28 -0000 On 01/05/05 11:21 AM, Kris Kennaway sat at the `puter and typed: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:13:06AM -0800, Paul Krill wrote: > > Do you have any contact information as to who I would speak to at > > FreeBSDfoundation? Thanks. > > Whoever responds to your mail to bod@FreeBSDFoundation.org :-) Putting > on my telepathy beanie, it could be Robert Watson. Jeez! I've been looking for one of those beanies! The homemade tinfoil style just doesn't seem to work on my boss. Do you have the one with or without the propeller? You have a link I can buy one from? :D -- Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD@keyslapper.org Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org Ô¿Ô¬ philosophy: Unintelligible answers to insoluble problems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:41:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C037616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:41:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf41.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf41.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5405843D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:41:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TastyNachos@charter.net) Received: from mxip09.cluster1.charter.net (mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.139])j05JfaoQ010763 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:41:37 -0500 Received: from 68-189-90-224.ca.charter.com (HELO [172.16.64.100]) (68.189.90.224) by mxip09.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2005 14:41:36 -0500 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.88,102,1102309200"; d="scan'208"; a="523300548:sNHT12555580" From: Remington To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:41:30 -0800 Message-Id: <1104954090.35341.2.camel@babyblue> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Dumb OpenOffice install error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:41:38 -0000 Anyone seen this or know to fix it. CVSup last night cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1 make install <10 hours later> Local Script Particel Zip (c) 2000 Sun Microsystems mkdir -p ../unxfbsd.pro/01/normal rm -f ../unxfbsd.pro/01/normal/* rm: No match. lzip -p . -e ../unxfbsd.pro/misc/lzip.log -l 01 -f openoffice.lst -d ../unxfbsd.pro/01 -n OfficeOSL -e ../unxfbsd.pro/01/Logfile.txt -C ../unxfbsd.pro/01/checksums.txt Local Script Particel Zip (c) 2000 Sun Microsystems WARNING! Project(s): gtk not found and couldn't be built. Correct build.lsts. ------------- ===> Installing for openoffice-1.1.3_1 ===> openoffice-1.1.3_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.5 - found ===> openoffice-1.1.3_1 depends on executable: pkg-config - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if editors/openoffice-1.1 already installed ./install: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:42:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0FF16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:42:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F8543D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zenzee@xs4all.nl) Received: from xs2.xs4all.nl (xs2.xs4all.nl [194.109.21.3]) j05Jg0LZ011019; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:42:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from zenzee@xs4all.nl) Received: from xs2.xs4all.nl (zenzee@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xs2.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j05Jg0sd067830; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:42:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from zenzee@xs4all.nl) Received: (from zenzee@localhost) by xs2.xs4all.nl (8.13.2/8.12.11/Submit) id j05JfsA9067809; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:41:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from zenzee) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:41:54 +0100 From: Vincent Zee To: Gregory Nou Message-ID: <20050105194154.GA63980@xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Gregory Nou , Timothy Luoma , Alvaro =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=2E_Gurdi=E1n?= , FreeBSD-Questions Questions References: <56BC8436-5E81-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <4469EBCA-5E84-11D9-A810-000A9592DF7A@lanoticia.com> <41DC079A.4060508@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <41DC079A.4060508@altern.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner cc: Alvaro =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=2E_Gurdi=E1n?= cc: Timothy Luoma cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:42:13 -0000 On Wednesday, 5 January 2005 at 16:28:26 +0100, Gregory Nou wrote: > Timothy Luoma wrote: > > > > >On Jan 4, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Alvaro J. Gurdián wrote: > > > >> Are you controlling iTunes (and all it's music library) on your Mac > >>from a FreeBSD box somewhere on the net, and playing it on the > >>FreeBSD box? > > > > > >Oh, there's one big caveat: there's apparently no way to tell iTunes > >to look for a iTunes server, it does it automatically... and I presume > >that it would NOT work over the internet, perhaps not even over a > >different subnet. > > > >TjL > > > Did someone however try to install something like jTunes ? I was > wondering installing it, and would have appreciate some tips about it. > Anyway, thanks for the tips. > > -- > GN > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I'm using SlimServer (/usr/ports/audio/slimserver) which is great for streaming music to wherever. It is written in Perl and is has also a web interface. Look here for more info: http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_features.html /\ Vincent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:47:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F2A16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:47:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ein.stridec.com (ein.stridec.com [203.124.122.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1082143D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sekali@kejadian.or.id) Received: from [155.69.164.73] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ein.stridec.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1CmH8K-0003KS-ER for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:47:53 +0800 Message-ID: <41DC4464.4050300@kejadian.or.id> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:47:48 +0800 From: I Nyoman Suka Ada User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ein.stridec.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - kejadian.or.id X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: random hdd turned off X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:47:59 -0000 Hi, This is general problem, but thought I just ask it here first. I have my OS-es installed on the first hdd, so there are partitions for FreeBSD, Linux[c]es, and Windows. Second hdd contains some partitions (some are linux partitions, others FAT partitions). Nothing critical, I seldom use these partitions manually. Only for occasional backup purpose. Now this second hdd somehow turns off itself at random time. Turns off, but ON immediately, that is. (Well, hardware faulty, but this is another subject). What happens is that, both FreeBSD and Linux will crash when such thing happens, while my Win XP simply pretends nothing's happened (however, expectedly, any application that happens to use the second hdd at that particular time, will crash, but not the Win XP itself). My assumption is that, there is something on FreeBSD and Linux that keeps doing something to every hdd, while that's not the case in Win XP. However, I like to have some enlightenment from others. Pls share your view. rgds, Guido From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:48:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FF816A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:48:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96A243D5C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:48:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so191917wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:48:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=sARAF0yHhsS7WtL012RZ/4CSLf3FnydtY0he41J/2gkF9Ri48FESzAtIkv3mOBBkbYfn9L8vXqNkXeL4VuNyzE0i6d7wVA4PTyeGK+yNQdcCrpxZ7IYFXsvq2Ri/k1Lgmx2tD8fmLug4tjHxJniUYP7uB5hvYFqMLT3KGOyqvPo= Received: by 10.54.28.19 with SMTP id b19mr22607wrb; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:48:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:48:30 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050105190843.GC1566@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050105185915.M98377@wcborstel.nl> <20050105190843.GC1566@xor.obsecurity.org> cc: Jorn Argelo cc: glewis@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Paul Krill Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:48:32 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:08:44 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:05:03PM -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:22 -0800, Paul Krill wrote: > > > I was doing some browsing on the Web, looking for something else, and > > > bumped into this. It seems like a lot of people already know. > > > > > > "Jorn Argelo" > > > 01/05/2005 10:59 AM > > > > > > To: Paul Krill , > > > freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org > > > cc: > > > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800, Paul Krill wrote > > > > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > > > > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > > > > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. > > > > > > Where did you get this information? > > > > What information? This post is very lacking in details. What is it? > > If you're the poster, what's your point? Why -questions? > > If it's just something I don't "get", please clue me in. > > http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/press/20041221-newsletter.shtml Thank you. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:49:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEBE16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:49:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4664C43D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:49:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j05JkGjX029552; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:46:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC44BB.8020608@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:49:15 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Paul_Krill@infoworld.com cc: tedm@toybox.placo.com Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:49:18 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > I think there is a story there for you but more along the lines of: >"Sun's wishy-washy licensing terms driving people away from Java" > Agreed. Sun has screwed up the licensing of Java from the start. Their deal with Microsoft early on made that clear to me. I prefer to use just about any other tool (except, of course, for JSP/.NET, etc). Python, Perl, ... any other tool will do the jobs I need done and I can avoid the sluggishness of Java, the licensing ambiguities, and the dependence on a company that is *not* a software company to begin with! Grrrr.. > Please state your specific affiliation with FreeBSD. None. Just a user. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:55:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856B616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:55:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDB643D5C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:55:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ippiraman@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so697369rne for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:55:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=bi3tKC/tx+lcPLY4UmLjDSfq5ybrqBkgP9qdq71AuM1Ueih1B8e0afERNYHGjhzzsJ3TVQ/rEm8/HVLSWbs8A8luUCViY3IIglBvNmc4v/ruc7BYvJcOVTdb07zNPG3Np2snwk2eQlVlJmcC9Xoo46fGf/N7KfAnPDUxtZCUW8o= Received: by 10.38.98.80 with SMTP id v80mr104609rnb; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:51:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.102.32 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:51:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:51:39 +0000 From: Irvin Piraman To: daniel quinn In-Reply-To: <200501051425.28386.freebsd@danielquinn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200501051425.28386.freebsd@danielquinn.org> cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: live/install cd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Irvin Piraman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:55:49 -0000 take a look at freesbie (www.freesbie.org) hth irvin On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:25:28 -0500, daniel quinn wrote: > i've been asked by my company to put together a basic cd that can install a > basic freebsd5 system just by putting in the disc and turning it on. it'd > have to have a base number of packages and be configured for networking etc > at bootup etc. > > but here's the problem. i'm a gentoo-linux guy. i'm still very new to bsd > and i'm running circles trying to figure out what i'm supposed to be looking > at for this. i found the livecd in ports, but i *think* it's made for > freebsd4 since the livecd.sh keeps failing when trying to copy certain files > from the cd, so i'm still lost. > > is this a common thing? is there a howto i should be looking at? am i on the > right track with the livecd? input is greatly appreciated. > > -- > Patron: That girl is a witch! > Mal: Yeah, but she's our witch. So cut her the hell down. > - Firefly, "Safe" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:56:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C4616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:56:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com (imo-m21.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80E243D46 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:56:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id k.1e3.322f0864 (3310); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:56:28 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <1e3.322f0864.2f0da06b@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:56:27 EST To: tom@vilot.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:56:46 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 2:39:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, tom@vilot.com writes: >>One system cost me 3 months salary in Russia. Is this how you treat your >>users? Why can't your developer use the machine they used to make 5.3 work? >> >>Everyone tell me to use LINUX. Now I know why. You support bad slow version >>and not good one. Very stupid people. >> >> >Thank you for trolling on an otherwise incredibly useful, civil, polite >and helpful list. > >Now be gone. Back to your Linuxian ways .... Asking a guy from a poor country to donate his hardware to a US organization at least partially funded by Yahoo is "helpful"? What planet are you from? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:57:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADD716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:57:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D7243D55 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:57:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j05JvCj29558; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:57:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Tom Vilot" , Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:57:12 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <41DC44BB.8020608@vilot.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: Paul_Krill@infoworld.com Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:57:15 -0000 Tom, Have you tried any of the alternative implementations of Java? Sun's isn't the only one out there. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tom Vilot > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:49 AM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Cc: Paul_Krill@infoworld.com; tedm@toybox.placo.com > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > I think there is a story there for you but more along the lines of: > >"Sun's wishy-washy licensing terms driving people away from Java" > > > > Agreed. > > Sun has screwed up the licensing of Java from the start. Their deal with > Microsoft early on made that clear to me. > > I prefer to use just about any other tool (except, of course, for > JSP/.NET, etc). Python, Perl, ... any other tool will do the jobs I need > done and I can avoid the sluggishness of Java, the licensing > ambiguities, and the dependence on a company that is *not* a software > company to begin with! > > Grrrr.. > > > Please state your specific affiliation with FreeBSD. > > None. Just a user. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:58:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B217F16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:58:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6225043D54 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:58:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j05JtLje032354; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:55:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC46DC.5040304@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:58:20 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <12c.5493593e.2f0d9c4a@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <12c.5493593e.2f0d9c4a@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Tm4528@aol.com Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:58:24 -0000 Tm4528@aol.com wrote: >Yes, you've "missed" the fact that kernels and distributions are independent >of one-another in linux. "Redhat" is just a distribution and has little to do >with what particular kernel version you are using. > First of all, that wasn't missed. It was quite intentional. I am underscoring the difference between Linux and *BSD. Second, I would argue with the assessment Linux doesn't do a "major release" until it is "arguably better than the previous version," and that this somehow is in contrast to *BSD. This is an ambiguous statement, at best. Define "major" and define "better." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:58:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCB016A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:58:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D556343D54 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:58:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so193367wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:58:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=rM53qnifTLUnoi5MsWBQurDHSvqQNY4XmESBcXrnfziNyNUl1HOHX2wNVUy+OzTgX8D4wrpb7iF1ZGIzm/Ba4zfPGW3uWvCyMkwVe7gyvvH12z7urOB1D5mJUI+SJGTjB2qh/pB16lO9rqSTQI90ZNNcWuAgVicLZA+UPojsvjw= Received: by 10.54.28.19 with SMTP id b19mr27426wrb; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:58:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:58:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:58:24 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Remington In-Reply-To: <1104954090.35341.2.camel@babyblue> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1104954090.35341.2.camel@babyblue> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:58:25 -0000 On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 11:41:30 -0800, Remington wrote: > Anyone seen this or know to fix it. CVSup last night > > cd /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1 > make install > > <10 hours later> > > Local Script Particel Zip (c) 2000 Sun Microsystems > mkdir -p ../unxfbsd.pro/01/normal > rm -f ../unxfbsd.pro/01/normal/* > rm: No match. > lzip -p . -e ../unxfbsd.pro/misc/lzip.log -l 01 -f openoffice.lst > -d ../unxfbsd.pro/01 -n OfficeOSL -e ../unxfbsd.pro/01/Logfile.txt > -C ../unxfbsd.pro/01/checksums.txt > > Local Script Particel Zip (c) 2000 Sun Microsystems > > WARNING! Project(s): > gtk > > not found and couldn't be built. Correct build.lsts. > > ------------- > ===> Installing for openoffice-1.1.3_1 > ===> openoffice-1.1.3_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.5 - > found > ===> openoffice-1.1.3_1 depends on executable: pkg-config - found > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if editors/openoffice-1.1 already installed > ./install: not found > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. There's a thread on this list from yesterday that states plainly that OpenOffice does not build on FreeBSD 5.3: "Not on 5-STABLE it doesn't. The "lzip" build tool crashes a couple of times during the build and the "make install" fails with: /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo $! > /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid ./install: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1." However, it does build on 4.11-STABLE. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:58:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F9616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:58:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFE643D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:58:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ian@codepad.net) Received: from [80.229.159.44] (helo=[192.168.0.4]) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CmHJ2-0005RN-Hl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:58:56 +0000 From: Xian To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:58:54 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501051958.54515.ian@codepad.net> Subject: ssh, window managers, and xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:58:58 -0000 I use xorg and it works well for everything local. To test it I started xorg with just xterm as the client like so: % startx /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm In this terminal I can start a window manger such as twm and it works fine, but I can't start a window manger on a remote machine: % ssh -Xf some.machine twm twm: another window manager is already running on screen 0? twm: unable to find any unmanaged screens I can use ssh like that to start an xterm or any other xclient on another machine tho. I don't think the KDE window manger has much success either cos when that is started remotely none of the windows have borders but it doesn't complain. I can do exactly the same things on a machine using XFree86 instead and they all work fine. Do i have to tell xorg to allow remote window managers or something? or dose it have a window manger built in that I have to disable? I have found this to happen on my workstation and on the FreeSBIE CD that I am trying to use at college. Any help will be very much appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- /Xian "In C we had to code our own bugs. In C++ we can inherit them" unknown author From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 19:59:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD9916A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:59:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25C043D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:59:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j05JuZlK032782; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:56:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC4726.2020709@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:59:34 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tm4528@aol.com References: <1e3.322f0864.2f0da06b@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <1e3.322f0864.2f0da06b@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:59:42 -0000 Tm4528@aol.com wrote: >Asking a guy from a poor country to donate his hardware to a >US organization at least partially funded by Yahoo is "helpful"? What planet >are you from? > The planet where 99% of the posts on this list are helpful, and the one from this guy (who calls the members of this list, and I quote, "very stupid people") isn't. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:00:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B88D16A4D0 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:00:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B96043D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:00:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j05Jvmoq033563; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:57:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC476F.8030908@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:00:47 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Paul_Krill@infoworld.com Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:00:53 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >Tom, > > Have you tried any of the alternative implementations of Java? >Sun's isn't the only one out there. > I have. I'm sorry, I am mostly venting my frustration with Java as a language, Sun as a company, and J2EE as a hugely bloated and over-architected solution in dire need of a problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:05:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3705716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:05:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com (imo-m28.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4B43D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:05:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id i.145.3c80d171 (3310); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:04:59 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <145.3c80d171.2f0da26b@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:04:59 EST To: Paul_Krill@infoworld.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:05:32 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 1:53:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, Paul_Krill@infoworld.com writes: "This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. " ------- So some application that runs like crap won't run on FreeBSD anymore. Big deal. Someone should start designing the new "java-free" logo. Seems like a big selling point to me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:10:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC4416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:10:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBC843D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:10:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 6F9354932; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:10:03 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s3922; Wed, 5 Jan 05 21:09:55 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A97B481B for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:09:55 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 7009838015; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:09:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CEE5C002 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:09:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:09:55 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Is bpf a part of IPFW, or am I confused? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:10:06 -0000 I started to do some research for a kernel compile that should migrate my system into the future I came upon the line "options bpf" in the kernel config file. I have searched the handbook and the manpages and not really understood the role of bpf. Is it supposed to be enabled when I use IPFW or is it another beast altogether, best left undisturbed? /Andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:17:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F9C16A4DD for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:17:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B1E43D5F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:17:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D020E51505; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:18:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:18:00 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andreas Davour Message-ID: <20050105201800.GA29099@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is bpf a part of IPFW, or am I confused? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:17:31 -0000 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:09:55PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote: >=20 > I started to do some research for a kernel compile that should migrate=20 > my system into the future I came upon the line "options bpf" in the=20 > kernel config file. >=20 > I have searched the handbook and the manpages and not really understood= =20 > the role of bpf. Is it supposed to be enabled when I use IPFW or is it=20 > another beast altogether, best left undisturbed? It's completely separate. Kris --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3Et4Wry0BWjoQKURAggVAJsHi36xsmQOPQZiJxLLXdYscucaNgCfUgvy +WFedwF7XmPfdjVNECNpIes= =bRIf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:19:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAAE16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:19:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CEF43D48 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:19:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin02-en2 [10.13.10.147]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id j05KJLls025738; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:19:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.1.245] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)j05KJJBG002892; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:19:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <145FEF80-5F57-11D9-93F7-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:19:19 -0500 To: Andreas Davour X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is bpf a part of IPFW, or am I confused? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:19:23 -0000 On Jan 5, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Andreas Davour wrote: > I have searched the handbook and the manpages and not really > understood the role of bpf. Is it supposed to be enabled when I use > IPFW or is it another beast altogether, best left undisturbed? The BPF, or Berkeley Packet Filter, is really intended for use by userland applications which want to perform network analysis and packet filtering. IPFW and the other firewalls for FreeBSD are written as kernel modules and thus deal with the network stack directly. The current DHCP implementation (ISC's dhcpd and dhclient programs) depends on BPF to work, so I would be cautious about removing it from your kernel unless you are sure you won't need it. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:23:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAB716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:23:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.mccme.ru (ns.mccme.ru [62.117.108.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEA743D53 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:23:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:emin@mccme.ru [62.117.108.7]) by ns.mccme.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id j05KXBOY066947 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:33:11 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:23:29 +0300 From: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050105202329.GA30133@mccme.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: MCCME Moscow Subject: sendmail and mbox permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:23:15 -0000 Hi. I use FreeBSD 5.3 and sendmail. When root rechieve the mail, mailbox's (/var/mail/root) permission bits has been setted to 600. Who and how it does? Can I change this behavior? -- Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii óÅÎÓÏÒÎÏ ×ÁÛ, å×ÇÅÎÉÊ íÉÎØËÏ×ÓËÉÊ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:24:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0FD416A4CF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:24:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64B043D5F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:24:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olivier.certner@free.fr) Received: from lon92-2-82-226-188-149.fbx.proxad.net (unknown [82.226.188.149]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C00C1EA for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:24:09 +0100 (CET) From: Olivier Certner To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:23:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501052123.42651.olivier.certner@free.fr> Subject: Re: Is bpf a part of IPFW, or am I confused? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:24:11 -0000 I'm not able to give a deep answer on that. What I can say is that you must compile the kernel with bpf if you want to use the DHCP protocol or the tcpdump utility. It would be great if someone can clarify the precise roles of bpf. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:25:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A8A16A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:25:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F79A43D2D; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:25:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j05KPEj29720; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:25:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Paul Krill" Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:25:14 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: Jorn Argelo cc: glewis@freebsd.org cc: Joshua Lokken cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:25:26 -0000 Hi Paul, I'm going to top-post here since you used html formatting and it's hard to insert into that. As for the FreeBSD distribution of the JDK, if you go to the link here: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml You will see that the organization "The FreeBSD Foundation" is currently distributing the 1.3 JRE and JDK. They would like to stop doing this and just see these included on the FreeBSD release CD's, or see Sun distributing them off Sun's Java download pages. The only costs involved I'm aware of were incurred in dealing with Sun to get the license fixed so that the FreeBSD Foundation could distribute it. And the Foundation bore those costs. Now, as for my affiliation, the short answer is that the FreeBSD Project is organized in such a fashion as there's really only 2 classes of affiliation - either a committer which means you can directly modify the source code (subject to an organized set of procedures) or a user, which can't. I'm not currently a committer so my affiliation is as a user. But I think what your really looking for is an official spokesman. And I have to tell you that such doesen't exist. Here's the long answer: The FreeBSD Foundation isn't exactly an "official spokesman" of the FreeBSD Project because in reality there really isn't any "official spokesman" of the FreeBSD Project. However they are the closest thing that the Project has to an official spokesman. Years ago the FreeBSD Project had a more centralized organization with a President who acted in that capacity. The Project got rid of that because since it's not an incorporated entity but merely a loose organization of volunteers, that person had no legal standing to negotiate contracts - and since that person wasn't elected from the entire FreeBSD userbase, the only reason they had any "spokesman" capacity at all is that the general userbase was contented with the way things were. So if your looking for quotes for the article, your going to have to attribute any user quotes to that person's resume, you can for example attribute any quote from me as "Ted Mittelstaedt, system administrator for Internet Partners Inc. (that is the ISP I work at) or you can attribute to my book authorship instead which is already in the prior post. Most other people on this mailing list (for that is what you have e-mailed to) have their own attributions. But, technically nobody speaks for The FreeBSD Project. The FreeBSD Foundation is as close as your going to get to a single point of contact. Linux is the same way, quotes are either attributed to the distributors, like Red Hat company, or to Linux Torvalds who is supposedly the single kernel maintainer. To get opinions from the people actually doing the work to make the Java port work on FreeBSD, you will want to e-mail the following mailing list: freebsd-java@freebsd.org I look forward to seeing your article in Infoworld! Ted -----Original Message----- From: Paul Krill [mailto:Paul_Krill@infoworld.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:38 AM To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; glewis@freebsd.org; Jorn Argelo; Joshua Lokken Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java Thank you very much for your help. I had some follow-up questions. * For background, FreeBSD wants to distribute the JDK with the FreeBSD OS? FreeBSD's implementation of specific Java technologies? Both? * Which version of the JDK has FreeBSD been prevented from redistributing? Are there cost issues involved? * Please state your specific affiliation with FreeBSD. "Ted Mittelstaedt" 01/05/2005 11:29 AM To: "Paul Krill" , "Joshua Lokken" cc: "Jorn Argelo" , , Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java Hi Paul, Hey, good luck to you! The basic root of the problem as I understand it is that Sun license for the JDK 1.3 originally prevented redistribution of the JDK with the FreeBSD which is something that the Project wanted to be able to do for obvious reasons. As a result the FreeBSD Foundation worked with Sun to make some modifications to the Sun license to allow this, as a result the JDK 1.3 can now be redistributed. Unfortunately with the newer JDKs Sun once again changed the licensing terms and the original people at Sun who came up to speed to understand the issues are no longer there, and there's a new set of people there in charge of this who are more busy with bigger fish to fry. It's of course quite legal for end users to download the JDK directly from Sun and compile it on FreeBSD themselves and then use it. There's no shortage of development time available to get the newer JDK's working on the latest FreeBSD versions and many people have already done so. The problem is in the licensing issues. If you puruse the Sun website the licensing terms are quite vague on Java as it is and half of them don't reconcile with public statements that various Sun officials have made at one time or another. I think there is a story there for you but more along the lines of: "Sun's wishy-washy licensing terms driving people away from Java" along with a story about how it pretty much takes a tema of expert lawyers to figure out if a business is in compliance with Sun's terms or not - and even then you don't know if Sun is going to come after you for royalty payments or not at some point in the future. Just try reading the many Sun licenses for Java off their website and try to imagine where a typical high tech company would fall in and you will see what I mean. Ted Mittelstaedt Author: The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide. Addison-Wesley, 2000. tedm@toybox.placo.com > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Paul Krill > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:14 AM > To: Joshua Lokken > Cc: Jorn Argelo; glewis@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > I am a writer with Infoworld magazine and would like to speak > with someone > at FreeBSD regarding these issues with Sun, for a possible story. I will > be contacting Sun as well. Here are some links I am following up on here: > > http://www.javalobby.org/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=16511&tstart=0 > > http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/press/20041221-newsletter.shtml (scroll > down to Java Update) > > > > Joshua Lokken > 01/05/2005 11:05 AM > Please respond to Joshua Lokken > > To: Paul Krill > cc: Jorn Argelo , glewis@freebsd.org, > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:22 -0800, Paul Krill > wrote: > > I was doing some browsing on the Web, looking for something else, and > > bumped into this. It seems like a lot of people already know. > > > > "Jorn Argelo" > > 01/05/2005 10:59 AM > > > > To: Paul Krill , > > freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org > > cc: > > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:53:07 -0800, Paul Krill wrote > > > This is Paul Krill of Infoworld magazine. I would like to speak with > > > someone at FreeBSD regarding issues with Sun. I am at 415-978-3228 > > > or email me with a number where I can call you. Thanks. > > > > Where did you get this information? > > What information? This post is very lacking in details. What is it? > If you're the poster, what's your point? Why -questions? > If it's just something I don't "get", please clue me in. > > > -- > Joshua Lokken > Open Source Advocate > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:27:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640F416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:27:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.uu.se [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329E243D2D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:27:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 4962448B5; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:13 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s3924; Wed, 5 Jan 05 21:27:08 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2ACB4896; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:07 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id CA3D838015; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F995C002; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:07 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050105201800.GA29099@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: References: <20050105201800.GA29099@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is bpf a part of IPFW, or am I confused? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:27:15 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:09:55PM +0100, Andreas Davour wrote: >> >> I started to do some research for a kernel compile that should migrate >> my system into the future I came upon the line "options bpf" in the >> kernel config file. >> >> I have searched the handbook and the manpages and not really understood >> the role of bpf. Is it supposed to be enabled when I use IPFW or is it >> another beast altogether, best left undisturbed? > > It's completely separate. OK, good to know. It wasn't all together clear from the documentation. /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:28:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E6316A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:28:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.uu.se [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41E143D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:28:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 070954896; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:28:38 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s3922; Wed, 5 Jan 05 21:28:35 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F884881; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:28:35 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 0ECC138015; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:28:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9FA5C002; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:28:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:28:35 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: Charles Swiger In-Reply-To: <145FEF80-5F57-11D9-93F7-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <145FEF80-5F57-11D9-93F7-003065ABFD92@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is bpf a part of IPFW, or am I confused? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:28:40 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Jan 5, 2005, at 3:09 PM, Andreas Davour wrote: >> I have searched the handbook and the manpages and not really understood the >> role of bpf. Is it supposed to be enabled when I use IPFW or is it another >> beast altogether, best left undisturbed? > > The BPF, or Berkeley Packet Filter, is really intended for use by userland > applications which want to perform network analysis and packet filtering. > IPFW and the other firewalls for FreeBSD are written as kernel modules and > thus deal with the network stack directly. > > The current DHCP implementation (ISC's dhcpd and dhclient programs) depends > on BPF to work, so I would be cautious about removing it from your kernel > unless you are sure you won't need it. Then I'd better not remove it from my kernel config, since I use dhcp for my network connection. Thanks for the warning! /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:33:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D6D16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:33:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m14.mx.aol.com (imo-m14.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399E743D46 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:33:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m14.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id n.1f7.3df7ca4 (18555) for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:33:10 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <1f7.3df7ca4.2f0da905@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:33:09 EST To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:33:18 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 3:00:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, tom@vilot.com writes: >>Asking a guy from a poor country to donate his hardware to a >>US organization at least partially funded by Yahoo is "helpful"? What planet >>are you from? >> >The planet where 99% of the posts on this list are helpful, and the one >from this guy (who calls the members of this list, and I quote, "very >stupid people") isn't. I don't think he was calling the members of this list stupid. Only that not supporting major chipsets and whining about not having the funding nor the contacts to get a $250 Mobo as an excuse was "Stupid". This is not a new chipset. Its been out for months and months. TM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:39:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C1416A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:39:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E83A43D39 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:39:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aran80@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so198821wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:39:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ng8q3/OK6wfp5tRPhYCAuSJQb1wtllMst8R8bms6vZqYaMFjAMpzYpQUS6m0L/sQj7hYydCet8mQArk+lZX8vP/Po/ZU6ZfizeFB5Kt56fKcCcQlK5NiAdC0JfUAKZH8KuQ6W2a4E47YzsT+HyzbNS2ToG77EKBBB+82vDBITS8= Received: by 10.54.42.41 with SMTP id p41mr291460wrp; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:39:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.49.75 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:39:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:39:26 -0500 From: Alvaro Rosales To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: usb modem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alvaro Rosales List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:39:27 -0000 hello guys , I have installed a usb modem andin my FreeBSD 5.1 box, the system has created a /dev/ugen0 and /dev/ugen0.1, but when I try to do a cu using ugen0 or ugen0.1 I dont get any answer from the modem, cu just says that the device is not configured. Is there any other file I need to configure?, do I have to edit /etc/ttys and add ugen0 or ugen0.1 ?. Thanks for your help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:42:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF1A16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:42:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se (pernis.its.UU.SE [130.238.4.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEE043D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:42:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 2D14D12B; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:42:07 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by pernis.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s303; Wed, 5 Jan 05 21:41:57 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61B811E; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:41:56 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id DD52E38015; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:41:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0DF5C002; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:41:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:41:56 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: Olivier Certner In-Reply-To: <200501052123.42651.olivier.certner@free.fr> Message-ID: References: <200501052123.42651.olivier.certner@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is bpf a part of IPFW, or am I confused? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:42:10 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Olivier Certner wrote: > I'm not able to give a deep answer on that. What I can say is that you must > compile the kernel with bpf if you want to use the DHCP protocol or the > tcpdump utility. tcpdump as well? Worth remembering. > It would be great if someone can clarify the precise roles of bpf. Indeed. That it is the userland framework helps, but I guess something is lacking in the documentation, or my skill at reading it. /andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:52:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB7316A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:52:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1527943D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:52:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon.burke@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so200559wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:52:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Y81/wX5FalMVC9UtsuUIFQRjaFCOsodXMdV5b3JDj8QGhqCyulDq1wZB6Dq/gruHr/j4LDkARcMKtWZXHywqBYEW5eFJ6tToole05pFXfSX0JAgG2Y8gABiXhLp+5RTQ9NGo2/kfBCv8k4VfnMc/nKcdl1nOsiLK82q7pZPvCXM= Received: by 10.54.53.9 with SMTP id b9mr15097wra; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:52:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.57 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:52:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d7d2dd2050105125235030a25@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:52:16 +0000 From: Simon Burke In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1104954090.35341.2.camel@babyblue> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Simon Burke List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:52:17 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:58:24 -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote: > > There's a thread on this list from yesterday that states plainly that > OpenOffice does not build on FreeBSD 5.3: > > However, it does build on 4.11-STABLE. > I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 running on 5.3. All that i neded to get it to build from ports was to install jdk14 before, as it tires to use the linux java which doesnt work. Unless things have changed in the past month or so?? -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:56:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B26D16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:56:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A845C43D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:56:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so201094wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:56:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=qRmNiptF8IftK+mqnmbAVS88TE5uOjE0/9gyY4Nccu3pR1sTDYsHIPSsQeLASR5PP/bxqPFwKi+u8MWne1EuK9yxn2Sv3wKorbaos0fEBfD4X/JmIkh1YzvGhl8H+A9XZ7t9kQIDSP6HFOQ1HTNy784g3VZuQaw6Nk/88gcHWzo= Received: by 10.54.1.36 with SMTP id 36mr183782wra; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:56:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:56:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:56:28 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Simon Burke In-Reply-To: <2d7d2dd2050105125235030a25@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1104954090.35341.2.camel@babyblue> <2d7d2dd2050105125235030a25@mail.gmail.com> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:56:29 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:52:16 +0000, Simon Burke wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:58:24 -0600, Joshua Lokken > wrote: > > > > There's a thread on this list from yesterday that states plainly that > > OpenOffice does not build on FreeBSD 5.3: > > > > > However, it does build on 4.11-STABLE. > > > > I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 running on 5.3. All that i neded to get it to > build from ports was to install jdk14 before, as it tires to use the > linux java which doesnt work. Unless things have changed in the past > month or so?? > -- > Theres no place like ::1 Not sure; I don't run 5.3; It was mentioned yesterday that, specifically, OpenOffice from the ports will not build on 5.3-STABLE. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 20:58:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C113D16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:58:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7D743D58 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j05Ktl1b038139; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:55:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC5507.5000908@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:58:47 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tm4528@aol.com References: <1f7.3df7ca4.2f0da905@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <1f7.3df7ca4.2f0da905@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:58:51 -0000 Tm4528@aol.com wrote: >I don't think he was calling the members of this list stupid. > You are correct. He wasn't. Rather, it was the people who *developed* the *free* and very powerful operating system (that he is attempting to use) he called stupid. I'm still waiting to see him post an apology. I, for one, am humbled by the BSD teams. They do work I don't believe I could ever do, regardless of my 15 years of work in software. >Only that not supporting major chipsets and whining about not having the funding >nor the contacts to get a $250 Mobo as an excuse was "Stupid". This is >not a new chipset. Its been out for months and months. > Really? Gee, so has my Linksys Wireless G card. In fact, I am fairly sure it's been out for more than a year. Guess what? It's not supported on FreeBSD 4.10 either. It *is* on 5.3 via ndis (which I was thrilled to discover). Kinda sounds like the situation with these SuperMicro boards. If it was *that* important to me to run this particular 802.11g card on FreeBSD 4.10, I *would* donate or loan it to a kernel developer. And that is perfectly reasonable advice. The fact that he's in Russia is of no consequence. His email address is hardcodeharry@yahoo.com. We're supposed to just psychically *know* that's a Russian domain and his net income for three months is what I earn in an hour? Open Sound doesn't work on 4.10. Only on 5.3. Am I going to complain to 4Front Technologies that they are "stupid"? I think not. Besides ... with a name like hardcodeharry, I would expect a little more intelligence; a little more willingness to dig into things. A slight tendency to ask the question: "how can I hack this code to work, and how would I contribute those modifications to the BSD team?" But I see none of that. In short: troll. Anyone with a reasonable desire to use any of the *nixes would have enough smarts to know: 1. check the hardware compatibility lists to determine whether or not the hardware you want to run is going to work with the particular *nix you want to use. This is no different between BSD and Linux, Solaris, etc. 2. Don't expect every damn piece of hardware out there to work out of the box with an older version of the kernel for the given *nix. This is NOT WINDOWS (thank god) and just because you have a particular piece of hardware doesn't mean it's going to work. It is your responsibility to know this and to work with it. 3. Ask questions politely in the appropriate forums, and be civil. Failing to do so is probably not going to get your question answered. I for one was drafting a post for this list thanking *everyone* on it for being the kind of terrific help they are when Boris' post appeared. The kind of discourse I see on this list (and on other BSD oriented lists) is a huge and welcome contrast to the childish banter I see on most of the Linux (and MacOS and Windows) discussion lists out there. It is like the kind of professional enthusiasm I remember on the BeOS lists. As a result ... please pardon me if I am intolerant of behavior and attitudes that sound to me like that which I left behind when I put FreeBSD on my laptop and two servers .... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:03:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A46C16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:03:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A46143D4C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:03:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so202049wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:03:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=DeK/dE7mQjbbTIL8r8lEMGL/YuTMOt/3gxO9zQ0vEtqRzcVY6futebYAqMmAGQMvOqwqUGuVMOuUVd1NDALFQ69nAP+Va1lrCkPI+rFtJ2tY9uUle9aRBTDDnqeuJ/1IFOt52JB1jlwjdV/6Do93RGkKjeaGwfrbrtUK8bhqQak= Received: by 10.54.53.9 with SMTP id b9mr20841wra; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:03:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:03:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:03:37 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Tom Vilot In-Reply-To: <41DC5507.5000908@vilot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1f7.3df7ca4.2f0da905@aol.com> <41DC5507.5000908@vilot.com> cc: Tm4528@aol.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:03:38 -0000 On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:58:47 -0700, Tom Vilot wrote: > Tm4528@aol.com wrote: > Besides ... with a name like hardcodeharry, I would expect a little more > intelligence; a little more willingness to dig into things. A slight > tendency to ask the question: "how can I hack this code to work, and how > would I contribute those modifications to the BSD team?" > > But I see none of that. > > In short: troll. > > Anyone with a reasonable desire to use any of the *nixes would have > enough smarts to know: > > 1. check the hardware compatibility lists to determine whether or not > the hardware you want to run is going to work with the particular *nix > you want to use. This is no different between BSD and Linux, Solaris, etc. > > 2. Don't expect every damn piece of hardware out there to work out of > the box with an older version of the kernel for the given *nix. This is > NOT WINDOWS (thank god) and just because you have a particular piece of > hardware doesn't mean it's going to work. It is your responsibility to > know this and to work with it. > > 3. Ask questions politely in the appropriate forums, and be civil. > Failing to do so is probably not going to get your question answered. > > I for one was drafting a post for this list thanking *everyone* on it > for being the kind of terrific help they are when Boris' post appeared. > The kind of discourse I see on this list (and on other BSD oriented > lists) is a huge and welcome contrast to the childish banter I see on > most of the Linux (and MacOS and Windows) discussion lists out there. It > is like the kind of professional enthusiasm I remember on the BeOS lists. > > As a result ... please pardon me if I am intolerant of behavior and > attitudes that sound to me like that which I left behind when I put > FreeBSD on my laptop and two servers .... Very well said, Tom, and accurate. Thank you. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:04:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5B716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:04:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from addr14.addr.com (addr14.addr.com [209.249.147.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99FA43D1D for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:04:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markski@addr14.addr.com) Received: from addr14.addr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])j05L4e60091048 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:04:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (from markski@localhost) by addr14.addr.com (8.12.8/8.12.7/Submit) id j05L4eH2091046 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:04:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:04:40 -0800 From: Mark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050105130439.A89993@logik.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <41DC5507.5000908@vilot.com> X-ADDRSpamFilter: Passed, probability (0%) X-ADDRSignature: 557508 Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:04:42 -0000 > I, for one, am humbled by the BSD teams... I have come out of hibernation early in order to agree with all of the above points. Back to bed for me, Good night. Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:19:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEB616A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:19:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp16.wxs.nl (smtp16.wxs.nl [195.121.6.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C0E43D39 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:19:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from [10.0.0.153] (ip3e833f72.speed.planet.nl [62.131.63.114]) by smtp16.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9V00GOO4KARD@smtp16.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:19:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:19:21 +0100 From: Kiffin Gish To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <1104959961.3256.6.camel@localhost> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: broken port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:19:24 -0000 Sometimes when I am trying to make something from the ports I get the message that the port is 'broken'. For example, while trying to build the enlightenment window manager. What does that mean and what can I do to get around it? -- Kiffin Gish Gouda, The Netherlands From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:27:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C420616A501 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mci-mail.nodes.net.ad-flow.com (mci-mail.nodes.net.ad-flow.com [66.48.68.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A5E43D53 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@danielquinn.org) Received: from douglas ([66.59.162.146]) (authenticated)j05LOTd21049 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:24:29 GMT Exocomm-Delivery-Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:24:29 GMT Exocomm-URL: www.exocomm.com From: daniel quinn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:26:31 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <1104959961.3256.6.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1104959961.3256.6.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501051626.31758.freebsd@danielquinn.org> Subject: Re: broken port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:27:22 -0000 On January 5, 2005 04:19 pm, Kiffin Gish wrote: > Sometimes when I am trying to make something from the ports I get the > message that the port is 'broken'. > > For example, while trying to build the enlightenment window manager. > > What does that mean and what can I do to get around it? from the bsd handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-broken.html -- economics is extremely useful as a form of employment for economists. - john kenneth galbraith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:27:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4156516A565 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2442743D1F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:27:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id j05LRQVG023743; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:27:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.1.245] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)j05LRP9G023375; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:27:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1104959961.3256.6.camel@localhost> References: <1104959961.3256.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <97747020-5F60-11D9-93F7-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:27:24 -0500 To: Kiffin Gish X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:27:27 -0000 On Jan 5, 2005, at 4:19 PM, Kiffin Gish wrote: > Sometimes when I am trying to make something from the ports I get the > message that the port is 'broken'. > > For example, while trying to build the enlightenment window manager. > > What does that mean and what can I do to get around it? The BROKEN line in the port's Makefile ought to specify a reason why the port is broken, but for more information consider: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/dads- noinstall.html If you figure out how to fix the problem with the port, submit your changes via send-pr or discuss the matter with the port's maintainer (or here on this mailing list). -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:28:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96A216A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:28:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEBC43D46 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:28:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5442A51354; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:28:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:28:54 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kiffin Gish Message-ID: <20050105212854.GA46575@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1104959961.3256.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1104959961.3256.6.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:28:24 -0000 --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:19:21PM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote: > Sometimes when I am trying to make something from the ports I get the > message that the port is 'broken'. >=20 > For example, while trying to build the enlightenment window manager. >=20 > What does that mean and what can I do to get around it? Usually, "is known not to compile on your version of FreeBSD". Enlightment itself is not marked broken though, so you'll have to post the exact error message you receive to get more specific advice. Kris --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3FwWWry0BWjoQKURAlvlAJ4/1lSGXYaS+O4zNeusJDl9EJY8BACfb+4A saecCqFo0GmKsLNFMEHGGF0= =pHw5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:32:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1EE16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:32:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx-relay.gwtc.net (mx-relay.gwtc.net [64.251.160.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B92543D68 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:32:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Justin@rapidcity.net) Received: from killer (dsl1-208-34-11-112.sky.gwtc.net [208.34.11.112] (may be forged)) by mx-relay.gwtc.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id j05LWUjh013628 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:32:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from Justin@rapidcity.net) Message-ID: <052d01c4f36e$16330110$152ea8c0@killer> From: "Justin England" To: "FreeBSD Questions" References: <059701c4f222$d7064a20$152ea8c0@killer> <1104910081.41db970107486@www.planete-linux.net> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:32:41 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: 3ware Esclade 7006-2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:32:32 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frederic Andres" To: "FreeBSD Questions" Cc: "Justin England" Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:28 AM Subject: Re: 3ware Esclade 7006-2 > Hi, > >> My question is mainly on the driver though. Which should I use? >> The twe driver seems to be working as far as I have tested, but do >> I need the driver downloaded from 3ware to get 3dm2 and the CLI to >> work? If so, what is the best way to install the driver as I am >> using this array as the boot disk? > > I have the same 3ware controller running on FreeBSD 5.2/5.2.1 and it > works very well. > > I use the default drivers (twe) during the installation of FreeBSD. > > Concerning the admin tools, I installed the port > /usr/ports/sysutils/3dm which provides an alert daemon and a web > interface to check hardward. > In addition, I downloaded the command line tool from 3ware website : > the cli program, version 7.7.1 for FreeBSD 4.8 Beta. (it works on > FreeBSD 5.2.x serie and should work on 5.3.x). > I am using the built-in twe driver and everything appears to be working great. I also downloaded the CLI util from the 3ware site, and after a bit or experimenting with it, I have that working fine as well. As for the 3dm util, when attempting to install from ports, this is what I get: ===> 3dm-1.10.0.011_1,1 This port is obsolete and should not be used. Please visit the 3ware website (www.3ware.com) for a newer version of the 3dm utility. Well, I downloaded the latest 3dm util, but am unsuccessful it getting it to work. It launches without errors, but when attempting to connect to it's web interface, nothing happens. Telnet'ing directly to it's port (888 by default) and sending it a GET request produces no output, so I am assuming that it is not compatible with the 5.3 twe driver, although the CLI interface is. Anybody been able to get the 3dm2 web interface, downloaded from 3ware.com, working with the twe driver that comes with 5.3-RELEASE? Thanks, Justin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:34:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E77E16A4D1 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:34:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DDE43D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:34:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon.burke@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so206457wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:34:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ADoD1vJUGaiylFOtC2IuMujLgMhRrzS5aSbFx167eRbitwGoHQ1hj2DfCUL9WkTuz207UsGSISyRKjjOcWfqdTzAYJx8kiLHY3vGmrZRg9ehOEmhFyw2jaJGtvIUb3OjfxQraYy8gSJrDIAPP7gU7cvsQ87v3s91bKbMU4kcZbk= Received: by 10.54.48.49 with SMTP id v49mr257303wrv; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:34:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.57 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:34:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d7d2dd20501051334366b181d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:34:55 +0000 From: Simon Burke To: Joshua Lokken In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1104954090.35341.2.camel@babyblue> <2d7d2dd2050105125235030a25@mail.gmail.com> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Simon Burke List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:34:56 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:56:28 -0600, Joshua Lokken wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:52:16 +0000, Simon Burke wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:58:24 -0600, Joshua Lokken > > wrote: > > > > > > There's a thread on this list from yesterday that states plainly that > > > OpenOffice does not build on FreeBSD 5.3: > > > > > > > > However, it does build on 4.11-STABLE. > > > > > > > I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 running on 5.3. All that i neded to get it to > > build from ports was to install jdk14 before, as it tires to use the > > linux java which doesnt work. Unless things have changed in the past > > month or so?? > > -- > > Theres no place like ::1 > > Not sure; I don't run 5.3; It was mentioned yesterday that, specifically, > OpenOffice from the ports will not build on 5.3-STABLE. > > I know that it can be a right pain to do, it took me a couple of days to finally get it done but i managed it. I dont know if things have changed now or will change with the java thing going on, but still thta might be completly different. I'm no sure but im pretty certain that openoffice2 doesnt work either. Though i may be mistaken -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 21:42:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C186916A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:42:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F8843D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:42:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j05LgdrI047328; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:42:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j05LgcLH013867; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:42:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j05Lga7Q013866; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:42:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:42:36 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Tom Vilot Message-ID: <20050105214236.GA13785@thought.org> References: <41DC476F.8030908@vilot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DC476F.8030908@vilot.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Paul_Krill@infoworld.com cc: Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:42:41 -0000 On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:00:47PM -0700, Tom Vilot wrote: > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >Tom, > > > > Have you tried any of the alternative implementations of Java? > >Sun's isn't the only one out there. > > > > I have. > > I'm sorry, I am mostly venting my frustration with Java as a language, > Sun as a company, and J2EE as a hugely bloated and over-architected > solution in dire need of a problem. > (Yup!) --I've been wanting to ask about kaffee [ if this is a Java clone ], and any other. C was the first quantum leap, OS- and application-wise. We have many alternatives to the Dennis Ritchie orginal, so it would seem possible to follow another course for things-java. Hopefully. So, without hijacking this thread *too* far, what other Open src projects will run "Java"-applets and so on?? gary PS: This might work well in the article... . -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 22:01:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B279216A4E3 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:01:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tarjoilu.luukku.com (tarjoilu.luukku.com [194.215.205.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8997D43D55 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:00:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from localhost (mta1-o.i.luukku.com [10.0.1.112]) by mta1-o.i.luukku.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFF1150243; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:00:49 +0200 (EET) Received: from rekon (92a7.dsl.mtv3.fi [82.203.167.146]) by tarjoilu.luukku.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EC788150013; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:00:48 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <040201c4f372$06d09210$92a7cb52@rekon> From: "Reko Turja" To: , References: <1761142680.20050104050725@wanadoo.fr> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:00:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Subject: Re: Running top on system console without being logged on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:01:16 -0000 > I'd like to run top on the system console to keep an eye on the > system, > but I'd prefer not to have the console logged on to do so. Is there > an > elegant way to do this? How about creating a user like this with vipw: topper::userno:groupno::0:0:Topper Harley:/nonexistent:/usr/bin/top and then just logging in on spare console screen as topper? I'm not sure if there are security implications though, even if the user is not member of the wheel group etc. -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 22:33:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB9216A54E for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:33:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from epicentre.ru (epicentre.ru [195.206.50.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D397D43D5C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:33:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrachik@epicentre.ru) Received: from 23.118.dial.irtel.ru (23.118.dial.irtel.ru [195.46.118.23]) by epicentre.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j05JdEWB000854 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:39:17 +1100 (MAGT) (envelope-from mrachik@epicentre.ru) From: Mrachik To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:32:28 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501060629.50544.mrachik@epicentre.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Re: Can't ping between FreeBSD and Win2K... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:33:16 -0000 >=9APlease, someone can help me? May be trouble in ipfw? Mrachik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 22:59:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9252016A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:59:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m16.mx.aol.com (imo-m16.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D70443D54 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:59:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id o.190.36a29286 (4418); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:58:54 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <190.36a29286.2f0dcb2d@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:58:53 EST To: joshua.lokken@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:59:03 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 4:03:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, joshua.lokken@gmail.com writes: > Besides ... with a name like hardcodeharry, I would expect a little more > intelligence; a little more willingness to dig into things. A slight > tendency to ask the question: "how can I hack this code to work, and how > would I contribute those modifications to the BSD team?" You obviously speak from your armpit, because to do the kind of work to support the O/S at the chipset level is beyond the reasonable expectations of even the most talented of programmers. The learning curve to be able to understand the basic code is exceptionally steep. Thats why there are maintainers, becuase what takes him an hour would take someone else weeks. "> 2. Don't expect every damn piece of hardware out there to work out of > the box with an older version of the kernel for the given *nix. This is > NOT WINDOWS (thank god) and just because you have a particular piece of > hardware doesn't mean it's going to work. It is your responsibility to > know this and to work with it. > > 3. Ask questions politely in the appropriate forums, and be civil. > Failing to do so is probably not going to get your question answered. > > I for one was drafting a post for this list thanking *everyone* on it > for being the kind of terrific help they are when Boris' post appeared. > The kind of discourse I see on this list (and on other BSD oriented > lists) is a huge and welcome contrast to the childish banter I see on > most of the Linux (and MacOS and Windows) discussion lists out there. It > is like the kind of professional enthusiasm I remember on the BeOS lists. " ------------------ Your point might have some teeth if the "newer" version were better, but the entire problem is that 5.x is much worse than 4.x, so there lies the issue. 4.10 is NOT supposed to be an "old" version. Its the production version. Because its readily admitted that 5.x is not yet ready for prime time by those in the know. And its not properly suppored. The "tranquility" of this list is apparently because the people on this list are too technically incompetent to realize how badly botched 5.x is. "thank you master, thank you for helping me get my mouse working, let me kiss your boots" The truth is that you are in awe of a "team" that has done a terrible job of transitioning to a new version, who can't get the new version to perform at close to the levels of the previous version after several years, and who have time and time again failed to meet their promised performance targets. They force their customer base to use the slothy thing, because modern motherboards and comm cards dont work in 4.x. And you stand and cheer them. Like a bunch of blind men cheering the one-eyed fool. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 23:14:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80BD16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:14:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C2F43D4C for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:14:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from j65nko@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so270275wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:14:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=b/eKidimKfErExfDcsXVaiVeEgx0t6vS8TM49yy/X8hIs/lGVAh3ySVyDVlZpqGnzxUYcwoTyeyizZqKIGNENq6W2iXfri5ZBnHLh0b/x+kJanx84voeQOHuW3VK9RY6z8cGmmVgSh/EI7K4zXECS6Lk7JDPJbQe00RJbBgJLEI= Received: by 10.54.51.38 with SMTP id y38mr85792wry; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:14:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.37.19 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:14:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19861fba0501051514873eea3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:14:05 +0100 From: J65nko BSD To: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" In-Reply-To: <20050105202329.GA30133@mccme.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050105202329.GA30133@mccme.ru> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail and mbox permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: J65nko BSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:14:07 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:23:29 +0300, Eugene M. Minkovskii wrote: > Hi. > > I use FreeBSD 5.3 and sendmail. When root rechieve the mail, > mailbox's (/var/mail/root) permission bits has been setted to > 600. Who and how it does? Can I change this behavior? > > -- For security reasons, the "root" account should not receice any mail. One of sendmail's alternatives "qmail" will even NEVER send any mail to the root account. Enter an alias for root in "/etc/mail/aliases" and run the "newaliases" command. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 23:14:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FED016A4CE; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:14:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B64F43D3F; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:14:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 4F6A98566D; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:44:36 +1030 (CST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:44:36 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Kiffin Gish Message-ID: <20050105231436.GY53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> <005301c4f353$ca9c90f0$9900000a@ZGISH> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JjNtGRvLZqzR8wa5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005301c4f353$ca9c90f0$9900000a@ZGISH> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: FreeBSD mobile Mailing List Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:14:39 -0000 --JjNtGRvLZqzR8wa5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Resequenced, time: 40 seconds. See http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] On Wednesday, 5 January 2005 at 19:24:27 +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote: > On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 07:23, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> >> I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number >> of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. >> Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me >> good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal >> wireless card to work? > > I've been the happy owner of a Dell Inspiron 8200 with a TrueMobile > wireless card. I suppose it's the out of sequence reply that made you miss: >> Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me=20 > Dual boot Windows/XP and FreeBSD 5.3, and so far never had any major > issues. > > Hope this helps... Not really. As I said, I have other Dell laptops, and on the whole I'm happy. I'm looking for input on the 1150. Thanks anyway. Greg -- When replying to this message, please take care not to mutilate the original text. =20 For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/email.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --JjNtGRvLZqzR8wa5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3HTcIubykFB6QiMRAszAAJ47Gn8vTQWMlowq1KwbR5urPbrsUQCdHpy1 vx3Sbny6+NG/iG7iDSBp8qE= =mW5H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JjNtGRvLZqzR8wa5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 23:19:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4212816A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:19:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m18.mx.aol.com (imo-m18.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6D443D46 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:19:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m18.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id k.11.3c133712 (4418); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:18:55 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <11.3c133712.2f0dcfde@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:18:54 EST To: tom@vilot.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:19:18 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 3:59:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, tom@vilot.com writes: Rather, it was the people who *developed* the *free* and very powerful operating system (that he is attempting to use) he called stupid. I'm still waiting to see him post an apology. I, for one, am humbled by the BSD teams. They do work I don't believe I could ever do, regardless of my 15 years of work in software. Well you are worshiping the wrong mountain, my friend, because the people who developed the free, powerful OS you speak of are mostly long gone. The current "team" is reponsible for a "new" version that is 1/4 slower than its predecessor. Doesn't seem so awesome to me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 23:28:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5905116A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:28:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5EE43D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:28:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j05NPIWl047129; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:25:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC7812.50207@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:28:18 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tm4528@aol.com References: <11.3c133712.2f0dcfde@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <11.3c133712.2f0dcfde@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:28:21 -0000 Tm4528@aol.com wrote: Whine, whine, whine, bitch, bitch, bitch. So go use Linux. Someone is twisting your arm? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 23:31:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2095416A4D2 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:31:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cyclone.mail.adnap.net.au (cyclone.mail.adnap.net.au [203.6.132.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E9D43D3F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:31:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bastill@adam.com.au) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (202-6-151-45.ip.adam.com.au [202.6.151.45]) by cyclone.mail.adnap.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD84D98EB9; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:05:16 +1030 (CST) From: Brian Astill To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:01:39 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <003501c4e842$2f46c830$2a64015a@apise6e37e23bb> <200412241641.47130.bastill@adam.com.au> <41CBF748.3010407@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <41CBF748.3010407@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200501061001.39979.bastill@adam.com.au> Subject: Re: Explore FreeBSD filesystem under Windows? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:31:27 -0000 On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:02 am, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > So ... if your flavour of Windoze can read FAT32, a FAT32 partition > > is a very good idea because all the commonly-available unices can > > read it as well. > > If it can't ...  the options aren't so good.  I'd think ext2 would > > be the only workable alternative to FAT16, but neither is > > desirable. > > > > BTW, I haven't found one, but does anyone have a way to make WinNT > > read FAT32? Found that myself: www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/utilities.shtml Which allowed me to download "fat32.exe" which allows NT to read/write but not create or format FAT32 partitions. Works OK. > You know, every time I think I'm becoming too cynical about the > Windows world, all I need to do is read a post like this, and remind > myself that it is impossible to be /too/ cynical about Windows. It gets worse. I did some googling about VFAT and unices and found that it is a "feature" of VFAT that all files/directories are seen by unices as root-only access AND that this is immutable in situ. drwxr--r-- 25 root root 16384 Dec 31 1969 hdb5 drwxr--r-- 9 root root 16384 Jul 23 23:28 FreeBSD-docs -rwxr--r-- 1 root root 71142 Jul 23 23:28 install-FreeBSD-notes I CAN copy a file (as root) to my personal home directory and (as root) chown and chmod there. I can then deal with the file as I wish. However, saving to the VFAT directory can only be done as root and the permissions then revert to " -rwxr--r- root root". Not nice. So it looks as though ext2 (using explore2fs from Windoze) is the only alternative to fat16. -- Regards, Brian sos-sa.org.au From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 23:54:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CB716A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:54:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m24.mx.aol.com (imo-m24.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE22C43D62 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id k.fd.a5a9703 (4418); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:54:29 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:54:29 EST To: tom@vilot.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:54:43 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 6:29:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, tom@vilot.com writes: Tm4528@aol.com wrote: Whine, whine, whine, bitch, bitch, bitch. You aren't technically capable of grasping a single point in this discussion, Tom, so why are you even trying? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:02:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA32516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:02:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B0243D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:02:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j05NxOIR048822; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:59:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC800F.703@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:02:23 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tm4528@aol.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:02:31 -0000 Tm4528@aol.com wrote: >so why are you even trying? > Why are you on this list? This is a questions list. Not an advocacy list, not a "BSD SUX" list. Why are you here? I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you were born with an advantage in that arena. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:04:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3F316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:04:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from forrie.com (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.45.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C7B43D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:04:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from [192.168.1.99] (i-99.forrie.net. [192.168.1.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by forrie.com with ESMTP id j06044pf033190verify=NO) for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:04:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Message-ID: <41DC80EC.10402@forrie.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:06:04 -0500 From: Forrest Aldrich User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041226) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20010925) (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com) X-MailScanner-LocalNet: Found to be clean Subject: Powering down FreeBSD 5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:04:09 -0000 Can FreeBSD be configured to actually power off the machine, rather than sit with "Press any key to reboot". We're redeploying some servers, and we'd like them to be powered on individually, not powered up upon plug-in to the power cable. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:12:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EBA16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:12:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DF043D2D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:12:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0609eoi050384; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:09:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC8278.7040400@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:12:40 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Forrest Aldrich References: <41DC80EC.10402@forrie.com> In-Reply-To: <41DC80EC.10402@forrie.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Powering down FreeBSD 5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:12:54 -0000 Forrest Aldrich wrote: > Can FreeBSD be configured to actually power off the machine, rather > than sit with "Press any key to reboot". > > We're redeploying some servers, and we'd like them to be powered on > individually, not powered up upon plug-in to the power cable. /sbin/shutdown -p Although it does depend on the hardware being able to do that. i.e., my laptop handles that just fine, but not the old dual processor Xeon here .... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:16:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC54D16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:16:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780C543D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:16:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62EE852911; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:16:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:16:34 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tom Vilot Message-ID: <20050106001634.GA94345@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41DC800F.703@vilot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DC800F.703@vilot.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Tm4528@aol.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:16:03 -0000 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:02:23PM -0700, Tom Vilot wrote: > Tm4528@aol.com wrote: >=20 > >so why are you even trying?=20 > > >=20 > Why are you on this list? >=20 > This is a questions list. Not an advocacy list, not a "BSD SUX" list. >=20 > Why are you here? >=20 > I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you= =20 > were born with an advantage in that arena. He has a Holy Mission. Kris --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3INiWry0BWjoQKURAlf7AKDcdJ+K6x+olxwTVULsmUJfCGml+wCbBfy2 HyUoRTSNe62/m8L+xdG5QpM= =wgQz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:16:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B49016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:16:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com (imo-d06.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D71B43D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:16:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id s.30.694ba972 (4418); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:16:48 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <30.694ba972.2f0ddd70@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:16:48 EST To: tedm@toybox.placo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:16:59 -0000 In a message dated 1/4/05 11:50:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, tedm@toybox.placo.com writes: > None of the new Supermicro hardware I've tried works with Freebsd > 4.10 properly. I've seen that this has been reported by others. > They are all based on the 7520 and 7530 Intel chips. 5.3 works > ok, but a 3.4/800 processor on 5.3 is slower than a 3.06/533 > processor on our old 7502 chipset based system with 4.9. What can > be done? >Donate one of the systems to a FreeBSD kernel developer. > >Ted Do you really have no contacts at SM or Dell? What kind of a development org has no contacts with major vendors? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:19:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4842316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:19:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF17543D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:19:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so223829wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:19:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=S1/2BHjzb2H7J4KyFkSD+Y/vOzwIf3CBXbAWEsroElniiVIT79Rv2XEehRYbrNddcu+szFCeDzLitKJzXwIt7SYbWklzBEPoThVWADk4hake4hsi76In7kiHCbiPMRFztqmVIl1HdnYQrAdMRYLqQ34aMwkS+mEBCWMcH5npmXE= Received: by 10.54.53.9 with SMTP id b9mr109333wra; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:19:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:19:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:19:32 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Leon In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <001401c4e38e$2b49bb10$a23db918@D1TWQX41> <000e01c4f369$f5373c50$a23db918@D1TWQX41> cc: Questions Subject: MySQL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:19:33 -0000 From: Joshua Lokken Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:16:40 -0600 Subject: Re: MySQL To: Leon Cc: Questions On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 16:03:08 -0500, Leon wrote: > Hi, > > I have a 5.3 version of FreeBSD. > I want to install MySQL > > Can you please tell me what version of MySQL I should install? > And where can I get installation and configuration instruction? > > Thanks, > Leon. > While I certainly don't mind being mailed off-list, I'll assume that you intended to submit this question to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. I have forwarded it appropriately. I would recommend you use the ports collection to install MySQL and any other software that you need. In order to ensure that you have the most recent ports collection, you should learn to use cvsup. There is excellent information on this in the Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html I believe that versions 3.23, 4.0, 4.1, and even a version of 5 of MySQL exist in the ports collection. I have experience only with 4.1, so I can't attest to which you _should_ use, also I don't know what your intended use is, but 4.1 should be just fine. Once you have the ports collection up-to-date, you can install MySQL by doing: # cd /usr/ports/databases/mysql41-server # make install clean HTH, -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:19:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF53E16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:19:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kender.sians.org (adsl-ppp00.fastnet.gr [193.58.186.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93A743D62 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:19:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thanos@sians.org) Received: from kender.sians.org (thtsou@localhost.sians.org [127.0.0.1]) by kender.sians.org (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j060JcnS001491 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:19:38 +0200 (EET) Received: (from thtsou@localhost) by kender.sians.org (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j060JZCp008731 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:19:35 +0200 (EET) X-Authentication-Warning: kender.sians.org: thtsou set sender to thanos@sians.org using -f Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:19:35 +0200 From: Thanos Tsouanas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106001935.GA29480@kender.sians.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: tcsh, colorful prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:19:51 -0000 Hello.. I have set up a colorful prompt for tcsh. It ends in default color so that whatever I type after it has default color. I dont really care for the color of the prompt, but I would like to see what i type (input) with a specific color. If I end the prompt with an open (say) green color, then my command is typed indeed in green but if the output has no color it's all in green (output of ps for example) In short, i would like the color to end upon \n... Any ideas of how to accomplish such a thing?? -- Thanos Tsouanas .: Sians http://thanos.sians.org/ .: http://www.sians.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:20:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E71316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:20:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d21.mx.aol.com (imo-d21.mx.aol.com [205.188.144.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2020443D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:20:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-d21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id g.190.36a3bb8d (4418); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:20:07 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <190.36a3bb8d.2f0dde36@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:20:06 EST To: kris@obsecurity.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:20:13 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 7:16:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, kris@obsecurity.org writes: > Why are you here? > > I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you > were born with an advantage in that are He has a Holy Mission. Yes, a mission to get the FreeBSD team to support 4.10 until they can get 5.x working properly. Whats not reasonable about that? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:24:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6634A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:24:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A97643D5A for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:24:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31A3551505; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:24:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:24:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <20050106002456.GA94509@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <190.36a3bb8d.2f0dde36@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <190.36a3bb8d.2f0dde36@aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:24:25 -0000 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:20:06PM -0500, Tm4528@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 1/5/05 7:16:29 PM Eastern Standard Time,=20 > kris@obsecurity.org writes: > > Why are you here? > >=20 > > I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you= =20 > > were born with an advantage in that are >=20 > He has a Holy Mission. > Yes, a mission to get the FreeBSD team to support 4.10 until they can get > 5.x working properly. Whats not reasonable about that? That you think "being an unbearable asshole" is an appropriate way to go about it. Kris --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFB3IVXWry0BWjoQKURAv+hAKCNw6OO+kAUiYlKi0wVPqFyx6lJRACYhJ7Y StbRAIB9u+uxqfwjei34GQ== =NfTb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:25:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206E316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:25:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB50A43D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j060PdM18562; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:25:39 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200501060025.j060PdM18562@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: kris@obsecurity.org (Kris Kennaway) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:25:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20050106001634.GA94345@xor.obsecurity.org> from "Kris Kennaway" at Jan 05, 2005 04:16:34 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Tm4528@aol.com cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Tom Vilot Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:25:48 -0000 > > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:02:23PM -0700, Tom Vilot wrote: > > Tm4528@aol.com wrote: > >=20 > > >so why are you even trying?=20 > > > > >=20 > > Why are you on this list? > >=20 > > This is a questions list. Not an advocacy list, not a "BSD SUX" list. > >=20 > > Why are you here? > >=20 > > I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you= > =20 > > were born with an advantage in that arena. > > He has a Holy Mission. Yes, and his holy mission seems to be to waste people's time and energy trying to draw attention to himself without making any contribution of value to the community. Less than two months ago, vastly excessive amounts of bandwidth and delete effort were wasted in this list on this creature. I fear insulting the good name of troll in this case. Can we NOT fall back in to that sinkhole and just ignore the trash. ////jerry > > Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:27:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEABF16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:27:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out004.verizon.net (out004pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A9A43D5C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:27:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reso3w83@verizon.net) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ([4.26.84.7]) by out004.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050106002729.KZAU8290.out004.verizon.net@ringworm.mechee.com> for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:27:29 -0600 Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 245AD2CE742; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:24:17 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:24:16 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <41DC800F.703@vilot.com> In-Reply-To: <41DC800F.703@vilot.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501051624.17200.reso3w83@verizon.net> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out004.verizon.net from [4.26.84.7] at Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:27:29 -0600 Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:27:30 -0000 On Wednesday 05 January 2005 04:02 pm, Tom Vilot wrote: > Tm4528@aol.com wrote: > >so why are you even trying? > > Why are you on this list? > > This is a questions list. Not an advocacy list, not a "BSD SUX" list. > > Why are you here? > > I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly > you were born with an advantage in that arena. > Have u never heard of aol'ers? They've been the scourge of the internet for years. I'm surprised one of 'em found their way into this FreeBSD list, broken filter maybe? ;) -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:27:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE0316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:27:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.166.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A6943D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from amayatra.os2.dhs.org (CPE-67-48-232-40.new.rr.com [67.48.232.40])j060RQgU009645; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:27:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.0.29] (IDENT:1002@vector.os2.dhs.org [192.168.0.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by amayatra.os2.dhs.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j060RKvG071544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:27:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Message-ID: <41DC85E7.8070706@cs.earlham.edu> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:27:19 -0600 From: Skylar Thompson Organization: Earlham College Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Forrest Aldrich References: <41DC80EC.10402@forrie.com> In-Reply-To: <41DC80EC.10402@forrie.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-os2.dhs.org-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-os2.dhs.org-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: skylar@cs.earlham.edu X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Powering down FreeBSD 5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: skylar@cs.earlham.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:27:41 -0000 Forrest Aldrich wrote: > Can FreeBSD be configured to actually power off the machine, rather > than sit with "Press any key to reboot". > > We're redeploying some servers, and we'd like them to be powered on > individually, not powered up upon plug-in to the power cable. Do you have ACPI compiled into your kernel? -- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:36:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DEE16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:36:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1CB43D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:36:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2/d) with ESMTP id j060ZhRl014563; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:35:43 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:35:43 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200501060035.j060Zh7O014562@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: flowers@users.sourceforge.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:36:43 -0000 On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 Danny MacMillan wrote: >On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:13:56PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: >> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:21:06 -0500 Parv wrote: >> >> >in message <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu>, >> >wrote Scott Bennett thusly... >> >> >> >> I've downloaded the following ISO image files: >> >> >> >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso >> >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso >> >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso >> >> >> >> I've also tried burning the first file to CD-Rs using Windows XP >> >> Home's own facilities and using Sonic RecordNow! under said >> >> system, but did not get bootable CDs either way. >> > >> >First time i tried the software of same name unknown version (IBM >> >ThinkPad T42, Windows XP Professional), i selected "Data Disc" and >> >chose the ISO image. Well, it did do its job: i got the ISO image >> >/file/ on the CD. >> > >> >After more poking around in the software interface, "Burn Image" or >> >some such option was revealed under the heading of "Data Disc" or >> >some such. And, that too did its job: i got the mini install ISO >> >image on CD to boot with. >> > >> Thanks for the suggestion. I've now gone back and found the >> little green button in Sonic RecordNow! for making a bootable CD. I >> then tried it with each of the first two files noted above. The CDs >> written via the green button do get a little farther than before. >> In the earlier case, the machine barely glanced at the CD before >> deciding to boot from the hard drive after all. The green button >> CDs, instead, run far enough to display a message in the upper left >> corner of the screen that says, "Missing operating system", and then >> hang. > >This is not intuitive, but you do not want to use the "make a bootable >CD" function of Sonic RecordNow! to make a bootable CD. The ISO files On what basis is the above statement made if you haven't used Sonic RecordNow! ? It certainly looks to me as though the green button is the *only* way to burn an image (not counting making an exact copy of an existing CD, of course). When the green button is used, one can then use a small file browser panel to select an image file to be burned. The files displayed by default are of the following suffixes/types: .img, .bin, and .ima. One can select a display of "All files" in the chosen directory instead, which is what I did in order to be able to see and choose the .iso files in question. As Robin Becker posted here, the version of Sonic RecordNow! distributed by Dell apparently does not know how to handle ISO 9660 image files, at least not if they're identified by file name suffix of .iso (see earlier remarks about file browser panel). Feh. >you downloaded are disc images that are already bootable. If you burn >a faithful reproduction of the image onto a CD, the CD will be >bootable. The way to do that is to burn the image to disc as an >image, not as a file. Most CD burning software have an option like Well, I was attempting to find a way to do that, thus my original posting. >"burn image to disc". For example, Nero Burning ROM SE has this >functionality in the Recorder menu under "Burn Image...". I haven't >ever used Sonic RecordNow! so I don't know where the option is (or See remarks above. Also, I don't have Nero, etc. I was hoping to invest as little as possible into software for Microslop's OS and to have a usable FreeBSD system about a month ago. :-( Unfortunately, neither my graphics card nor my wireless card has support under 5.2.1. 5.3 allegedly will allow me to attempt to borrow the wireless driver from Windows XP for use under FreeBSD (via NDIS). The most recent XFree86 and X.org versions of X11R6 are alleged to have simple drivers for the graphics card (but probably with no 3D acceleration :-( ), though it isn't clear to me yet whether the 5.3 kernel supports the communication with the card. And, to protect what I am stuck using in the meantime, I bought a disk backup package that doesn't work right and is falsely advertised by Symantec as being supported, namely, Norton Ghost 9.0. Grumble, hiss, grumble, grumble... I'm beginning to think that software developers who develop applications for Microslop's OS automatically suffer brain damage in the process. >even if it has one, though Parv's comments above would suggest that it >does). If it doesn't, you are going to need to use some other >software because burning the image to disc is the only way you will >get the outcome you want. > It appears that I have found a way to do it with burncd under 5.2.1. I'll reply later to the article that gave me the tip to get it to work, and I'll describe the peculiar, new-but-not-show-stopping problem encountered along the way. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:38:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C76816A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:38:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ritamari.vonostingroup.com (ip193-230.digitalrealm.net [216.144.193.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15F543D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:38:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laszlof@vonostingroup.com) Received: from pcp01939978pcs.waldlk01.mi.comcast.net ([68.32.91.145]) by ritamari.vonostingroup.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CmLgT-000LXo-UG; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:39:26 -0500 Message-ID: <41DC8894.1030004@vonostingroup.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 19:38:44 -0500 From: "Frank J. Laszlo" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tm4528@aol.com References: <190.36a29286.2f0dcb2d@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <190.36a29286.2f0dcb2d@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ritamari.vonostingroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vonostingroup.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: joshua.lokken@gmail.com Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:38:28 -0000 Tm4528@aol.com wrote: >------------------ > >Your point might have some teeth if the "newer" version were better, but >the entire problem is that 5.x is much worse than 4.x, so there lies the >issue. 4.10 is NOT supposed to be an "old" version. Its the production >version. Because its readily admitted that 5.x is not yet ready for >prime time by those in the know. And its not properly suppored. > > > Thats strange, http://www.freebsd.org says 5.3 is the Production release and 4.10 is the (legacy) production release I guess they just dont teach you words like "legacy" in troll school. >The truth is that you are in awe of a "team" that has done a terrible job >of transitioning to a new version, who can't get the new version to perform >at close to the levels of the previous version after several years, and who >have time and time again failed to meet their promised performance targets. >They force their customer base to use the slothy thing, because modern >motherboards and comm cards dont work in 4.x. And you stand and cheer >them. Like a bunch of blind men cheering the one-eyed fool. > > If they've done such a bad job, why not contribute something other than useless rants on the lists? And what customer base? I dont think the FreeBSD Foundation is trying to "sell" their product. and who says all modern/new cards are supported in 4.x, I've used several new devices on 4.x without problems. Why dont you just install windows and be happy with your OS that "just works". Regards, Frank Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:40:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996C116A4CE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:40:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3541343D39; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:40:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 2369C85665; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:10:37 +1030 (CST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:10:37 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Eric Schuele Message-ID: <20050106004037.GA53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> <41DC21DF.30801@computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MziYxCZO8WOaTd4I" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DC21DF.30801@computer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: FreeBSD mobile Mailing List Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:40:40 -0000 --MziYxCZO8WOaTd4I Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday, 5 January 2005 at 11:20:31 -0600, Eric Schuele wrote: > Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number >> of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. >> Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me >> good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal >> wireless card to work? > > My point is... you may have to use the windows drivers with a wrapper to > get it to work.=20 Yes, that was my suspicion as well, and one of the reasons for my question. > On the other hand... I've switched to an Atheros based miniPCI card > which works quite well with 'device ath'. I can give you a link if > your interested. Thanks, but no. I have wireless cards here. I was wondering about the onboard card. > So you might dig around and try to find out positively whose card > those miniPCI devices are. That's what I'm trying to do, and also (if possible) get more details about how to get them running. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --MziYxCZO8WOaTd4I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3IkFIubykFB6QiMRAqd4AJ0TGxSgm6Ma9feJYoo/bxWx1bu9YgCfVStS ba5A7e8cursP8dowYreCWGw= =BGHT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MziYxCZO8WOaTd4I-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 00:44:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFC016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:44:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.50.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D1943D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:44:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (localhost.uwaterloo.ca [127.0.0.1]) j060iaAG015982 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:44:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: (from www@localhost) by ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j060iaAw015981 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:44:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca: www set sender to bruce@engmail.uwaterloo.ca using -f Received: from 65.93.198.45 ( [65.93.198.45])HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:44:36 -0500 Message-ID: <1104972276.41dc89f446948@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:44:36 -0500 From: Bruce Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1104860328.41dad4a8ebd90@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104205922.GD13991@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104875116.41db0e6c7fbf3@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050104221531.GA70844@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104892047.41db508f4c7f4@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <20050105045329.GA77072@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104932867.41dbf003405b1@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <1104941302.41dc10f6a1e9b@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> <1104947802.41dc2a5aa6c62@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <1104947802.41dc2a5aa6c62@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 / FreeBSD-4.6.2 X-Originating-IP: 65.93.198.45 Subject: Re: New FreeBSD 5.3 e-mail server extremely slow - traced to getpwnam maybe ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:44:32 -0000 Quoting Bruce Campbell : > ... > Well, somewhat unbelievably, copying a getpwent.c from 4.7 > and remaking libc on 5.3 with it worked. Load average > has gone from 70 to 2. > One of my co-workers has found a less kludgey workaround for the high load problem we were seeing on 5.3 with large /etc/master.passwd, as follows: --- /etc/nsswitch.conf.old Wed Jan 5 19:23:24 2005 +++ /etc/nsswitch.conf Wed Jan 5 19:23:43 2005 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -group: compat +group: files group_compat: nis hosts: files dns networks: files -passwd: compat +passwd: files passwd_compat: nis shells: files System is purring with load average under 1 now, 200,000 pop/imap sessions per day and 200,000 e-mails per day, all spamassassinated. For more details and ongoing followup, see: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=75855 -- Bruce Campbell Engineering Computing CPH-2374B University of Waterloo (519)888-4567 ext 5889 ---------------------------------------- This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:04:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AC516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:04:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384D143D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:04:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0611Ds0052233; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:01:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC8E83.10100@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:04:03 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry McAllister References: <200501060025.j060PdM18562@clunix.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200501060025.j060PdM18562@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:04:16 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: >Yes, and his holy mission seems to be to waste people's time and energy >trying to draw attention to himself without making any contribution of >value to the community. Less than two months ago, vastly excessive >amounts of bandwidth and delete effort were wasted in this list on this >creature. I fear insulting the good name of troll in this case. >Can we NOT fall back in to that sinkhole and just ignore the trash. > > Okay, I'm with you Jerry. My apologies to the group for wasting bandwidth on this silly person. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:10:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7B516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:10:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1155643D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:10:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0617DtU052532; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:07:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC8FF5.9040001@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:10:13 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Schuele References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> <41DC21DF.30801@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <41DC21DF.30801@computer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:10:25 -0000 Eric Schuele wrote: > On the other hand... I've switched to an Atheros based miniPCI card > which works quite well with 'device ath'. I can give you a link if > your interested. I might be interested in one of those. I have a Dell Inspiron 8200. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:16:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3040F16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:16:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D857C43D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:16:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2/d) with ESMTP id j061FANe015201 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:15:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:15:10 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200501060115.j061FAgJ015200@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:16:06 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:58:53 EST the latest troll blathered: >In a message dated 1/5/05 4:03:59 PM Eastern Standard Time, >joshua.lokken@gmail.com writes: > >> Besides ... with a name like hardcodeharry, I would expect a little more >> intelligence; a little more willingness to dig into things. A slight >> tendency to ask the question: "how can I hack this code to work, and how >> would I contribute those modifications to the BSD team?" > > >You obviously speak from your armpit, because to do the kind of work Still in the Dark Ages, eh? Even after all the gentle tutelage posted in response to the childishly, foolishly insulting prior postings...tsk, tsk. >to support the O/S at the chipset level is beyond the reasonable expectations >of even the most talented of programmers. The learning curve to be able Ah. So the troll didn't really expect *anybody* reasonably to have provided support. It just wanted something to bitch about on this list. It should go back to the bit bucket it came from. >to understand the basic code is exceptionally steep. Thats why there are >maintainers, becuase what takes him an hour would take someone else >weeks. > [more tutelage and some Trollish ravings deleted --SB] >They force their customer base to use the slothy thing, because modern Apparently, the troll still hasn't fathomed that the developers have no customer base because they don't sell the software. That's why it's called |||| VVVV FreeBSD ^^^^ |||| though that probably wouldn't matter to a troll even if it could understand it. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:16:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8A716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:16:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cedant2.abac.com (cedant2.abac.com [66.175.0.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A240943D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:16:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@vesterman.com) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (ool-44c40513.dyn.optonline.net [68.196.5.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by cedant2.abac.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j061GB0F071291 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:16:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bob@vesterman.com) Message-ID: <41DC9473.6020209@vesterman.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:29:23 -0500 From: Robert William Vesterman User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Subject: source control question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:16:15 -0000 Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a base assumption that, more or less, "directory" == "project". But in reality, a directory could be a project, or part of a project, or part of many projects, or merely structural (i.e. merely to organize subdirectories, any of which may or may not be used in any number of projects, each project of which is not necessarily completely contained in the structural parent directory). And a project may span many directories, each of which is not necessarily anywhere near the others in the overall repository tree structure, and whose repository tree "neighbors" are not necessarily parts of the same project. For example, you may have top level repository things like "work" and "personal", which are completely structural. And maybe "utils", which you might use in both work and personal projects. And then if you use some Java, and do the standard way of making packages (com.mydomain.blah.blah.blah), you'll probably have a "java" directory outside of "work" and "personal", having a whole tree of subdirectories, any of which may be a complete project, part of a project, part of many projects, et cetera. And a project may be spread across "personal" and "java" and "utils" and any number of other organizational things. I'm sure there are ways to bend things like Subversion into kind of behaving the way I want, but are there any systems that are actually designed with this concept in mind? Thanks, BOb Vesterman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:34:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DDA16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:34:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AF343D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:34:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j061YM5O026163 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:34:22 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j061YMbc026160; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:34:22 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:34:22 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200501060134.j061YMbc026160@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: System update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:34:27 -0000 Hi, I have serveral questions about the update procedure. 1) starting from 4.10 RELEASE I have cvsup-ed to 4.10 RELENG. Now what is the command to build FreeBSD? The hand book says "do not use make world, but use make buildworld", and look at /usr/src/UPDATING first. But in /usr/src/UPDATING it is said to use "make world" so I am confused. 2) starting from 4.9 RELEASE, can I cvsup to 4.10 RELENG and build FreeBSD the same way? 3) starting from 4.7 RELEASE? 4) I have a mail server running sendmail with a very customised configuration. So far I have compiled/installed my own copy of sendmail. If i update the system, it will re-install a standardized sendmail. Now if I want the update procedure to regenerate a customised sendmail, where in FreeBSD sendmail heirarchy should I put my own cf/cf/sendmail.mc and devtools/Site/site.config.m4 ? Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:48:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0971316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:48:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr (smtp7.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2FB43D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0706.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 5D2FB1C000A7 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:48:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0706.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 44C0F1C0009D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:48:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:48:12 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1507832106.20050106024812@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <040201c4f372$06d09210$92a7cb52@rekon> References: <1761142680.20050104050725@wanadoo.fr> <040201c4f372$06d09210$92a7cb52@rekon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Running top on system console without being logged on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:48:14 -0000 > How about creating a user like this with vipw: > topper::userno:groupno::0:0:Topper Harley:/nonexistent:/usr/bin/top > and then just logging in on spare console screen as topper? > > I'm not sure if there are security implications though, even if the user > is not member of the wheel group etc. I've considered this, but like you, I'm not sure of the security implications, so I haven't actually done it. And is it possible to include command-line options in the login shell command for a user? -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:48:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70F116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:48:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BB243D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:48:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 227945333C; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:48:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:48:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Olivier Nicole Message-ID: <20050106014855.GA11069@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200501060134.j061YMbc026160@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501060134.j061YMbc026160@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:48:25 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:34:22AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have serveral questions about the update procedure. >=20 > 1) starting from 4.10 RELEASE I have cvsup-ed to 4.10 RELENG. Now what > is the command to build FreeBSD? >=20 > The hand book says "do not use make world, but use make buildworld", > and look at /usr/src/UPDATING first. But in /usr/src/UPDATING it is > said to use "make world" so I am confused. Where does it say that? I see only comments in passing about 'make world', but the explicit directions on how to update (correctly) mention the separate buildworld/installworld steps. Kris --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3JkHWry0BWjoQKURAnsvAKCB7b2ttq5wkfH241uhEr67tyqANQCgq/TS XCp5FZfnXiYpOn49iMPOCZg= =KKrO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:53:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F7016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:53:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr (smtp7.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E85343D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:53:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0706.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 9074A1C0009D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:53:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0706.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 782B21C00088 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:53:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:53:18 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41DC44BB.8020608@vilot.com> References: <41DC44BB.8020608@vilot.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:53:19 -0000 Tom Vilot writes: TV> I prefer to use just about any other tool (except, of course, for TV> JSP/.NET, etc). Python, Perl, ... any other tool will do the jobs I TV> need done and I can avoid the sluggishness of Java, the licensing TV> ambiguities, and the dependence on a company that is *not* a TV> software company to begin with! I tend to agree. Are people still using Java? Perl seems to do just about everything. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:54:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7710916A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:54:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out007.verizon.net (out007pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DF243D55 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:54:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sigfever@verizon.net) Received: from jwxp ([141.152.44.113]) by out007.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050106015423.RTDN21228.out007.verizon.net@jwxp> for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:54:23 -0600 From: "John W Ward II" To: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:54:22 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c4f392$a5175100$1405080e@SigFever.badlandsgang.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 1 (Highest) X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: High X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out007.verizon.net from [141.152.44.113] at Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:54:23 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: error in burning v5.3 disc 2.iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:54:24 -0000 I can burn the other downloads but disc2.iso freezes up the system and = won't respond. I have a PIII 1ghz w/512 ram, XPPro and Nero v5 software. I = have never had a problem burning an iso before and even downloaded the file = three times and twice from different ftp sites. Can you help? Thanks, John Ward From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:55:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3EC16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:55:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A9743D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:55:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd3mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd3mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.179]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9V0081NHBYN330@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:10 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml5so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.149]) by pd3mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9V00JI5HBYSUJ0@pd3mr3so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:10 -0700 (MST) Received: from procyon.nekulturny.org (S0106000c41b2b9a3.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.45.143]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I9V00C48HBYCS@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:10 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:10 -0700 From: Danny MacMillan In-reply-to: <200501060035.j060Zh7O014562@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: Scott Bennett Message-id: <20050106015510.GA1778@procyon.nekulturny.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <200501060035.j060Zh7O014562@mp.cs.niu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: flowers@users.sourceforge.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:55:12 -0000 On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:35:43PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 Danny MacMillan > wrote: > > >On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:13:56PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: > >> On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:21:06 -0500 Parv wrote: > >> > >> >in message <200501030936.j039arAx022411@mp.cs.niu.edu>, > >> >wrote Scott Bennett thusly... > >> >> > >> >> I've downloaded the following ISO image files: > >> >> > >> >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso > >> >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > >> >> 5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso > >> >> > >> >> I've also tried burning the first file to CD-Rs using Windows > >> >> XP Home's own facilities and using Sonic RecordNow! under said > >> >> system, but did not get bootable CDs either way. > >> > > >> >First time i tried the software of same name unknown version (IBM > >> >ThinkPad T42, Windows XP Professional), i selected "Data Disc" > >> >and chose the ISO image. Well, it did do its job: i got the ISO > >> >image /file/ on the CD. > >> > > >> >After more poking around in the software interface, "Burn Image" > >> >or some such option was revealed under the heading of "Data Disc" > >> >or some such. And, that too did its job: i got the mini install > >> >ISO image on CD to boot with. > >> > > >> Thanks for the suggestion. I've now gone back and found the > >> little green button in Sonic RecordNow! for making a bootable CD. > >> I then tried it with each of the first two files noted above. The > >> CDs written via the green button do get a little farther than > >> before. In the earlier case, the machine barely glanced at the CD > >> before deciding to boot from the hard drive after all. The green > >> button CDs, instead, run far enough to display a message in the > >> upper left corner of the screen that says, "Missing operating > >> system", and then hang. > > > >This is not intuitive, but you do not want to use the "make a > >bootable CD" function of Sonic RecordNow! to make a bootable CD. > > On what basis is the above statement made if you haven't used > Sonic RecordNow! ? It certainly looks to me as though the green > button is the *only* way to burn an image (not counting making an > exact copy of On the basis of your characterizing the little green button as being "for making a bootable CD", and my understanding of that function in alternative software. In short: I misunderstood. I apologize for the misdirection. -- Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:55:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CBA16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:55:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A410743D55 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:55:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j061tReS027072 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:55:27 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j061tRYk027069; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:55:27 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:55:27 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200501060155.j061tRYk027069@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: kris@obsecurity.org In-reply-to: <20050106014855.GA11069@xor.obsecurity.org> (message from Kris Kennaway on Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:48:56 -0800) X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:55:29 -0000 > Where does it say that? I see only comments in passing about 'make > world', but the explicit directions on how to update (correctly) > mention the separate buildworld/installworld steps. Around line 490 of /usr/src/UPDATING (version 4.10-p5) it reads: To rebuild everything --------------------- make world Except when it doesn't work :-) Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:57:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E2B16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:57:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CBD43D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:57:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j061sKxR054297 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:54:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DC9AFA.8090003@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:57:14 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41DC44BB.8020608@vilot.com> <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:57:21 -0000 Anthony Atkielski wrote: >I tend to agree. Are people still using Java? > Yeah, I think so ..... strange as it seems to me. >Perl seems to do just about everything. > Agreed. OTOH, Perl is quite idiomatic, and that can be a real hurdle. Plus, there are so *many* ways to do things in Perl, that it can be easy to write what another programmer would consider opaque, impenetrable code. Python seems to be a nice intermediary. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 01:59:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A2E16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:59:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD6C43D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:59:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j061x5d8027179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:59:05 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j061x5k7027176; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:59:05 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:59:05 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200501060159.j061x5k7027176@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: sigfever@verizon.net In-reply-to: <000001c4f392$a5175100$1405080e@SigFever.badlandsgang.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error in burning v5.3 disc 2.iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:59:07 -0000 > I can burn the other downloads but disc2.iso freezes up the system and won't > respond. I have a PIII 1ghz w/512 ram, XPPro and Nero v5 software. I have I was currently facing the problem. It seems that it takes some time to ingest all the information in the disc2.iso image before it starts burning. But I let it run on another machines and it finally completed. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 02:08:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F68916A4CF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:08:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.netspace.net.au (cumulus.netspace.net.au [203.10.110.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5767443D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:08:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@fielden.com.au) Received: from [192.168.2.7] (220-253-39-119.VIC.netspace.net.au [220.253.39.119]) by mail.netspace.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F667103A; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:08:44 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <41DC9D9B.9050007@fielden.com.au> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:08:27 +1100 From: Rowdy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John W Ward II References: <000001c4f392$a5175100$1405080e@SigFever.badlandsgang.com> In-Reply-To: <000001c4f392$a5175100$1405080e@SigFever.badlandsgang.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error in burning v5.3 disc 2.iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 02:08:47 -0000 John W Ward II wrote: > I can burn the other downloads but disc2.iso freezes up the system and won't > respond. I have a PIII 1ghz w/512 ram, XPPro and Nero v5 software. I have > never had a problem burning an iso before and even downloaded the file three > times and twice from different ftp sites. Can you help? > Thanks, > John Ward disc2 contains a live filesystem, including the ports tree. There are literally 10's of thousands of files - on my Athlon 64 3200+ it took well over 15 minutes for Nero to collate the directories before it started burning. Have patience ... Rowdy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 02:09:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB46C16A4D0 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:09:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE3943D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:09:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 344B052AD9; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:10:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:10:21 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Olivier Nicole Message-ID: <20050106021020.GA19423@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050106014855.GA11069@xor.obsecurity.org> <200501060155.j061tRYk027069@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501060155.j061tRYk027069@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: System update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 02:09:50 -0000 --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:55:27AM +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Where does it say that? I see only comments in passing about 'make > > world', but the explicit directions on how to update (correctly) > > mention the separate buildworld/installworld steps. >=20 > Around line 490 of /usr/src/UPDATING (version 4.10-p5) it reads: >=20 > To rebuild everything > --------------------- > make world >=20 > Except when it doesn't work :-) OK, turns out the copy in my allegedly RELENG_4 tree was from HEAD. The above is strictly true, but not helpful since it doesn't tell you when it doesn't work. For the full guaranteed-to-work instructions, read the section a few lines down about updating "from 4.0-RELEASE or later to the most current 4.x-STABLE". Kris --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3J4MWry0BWjoQKURAnkkAJwPt9GQigsZsNUNE8DCClEaVBT5jACg4uBt fLlF/LdiJoVYPp1iStw6J1s= =6mZf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 02:17:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FED216A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:17:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53803.mail.yahoo.com (web53803.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B601643D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:17:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stigmata_blackangel@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 92787 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jan 2005 02:17:06 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=SbSbyVnSq3TcyHPJxLcrxYc8r8BvZhhZglk9pVIgYR/40yugfjICFv2lG5qX1NAgf3qKiih/nrLGFNJ4MIVPCErQ9nQM86eoaOCH1ZfRqZJuLm9HZhGn10PQBMRMmmw84XDMvF2K1qAA+a1BqMsXIn9VwcDBQsjwOVeU/j9Z3Cs= ; Message-ID: <20050106021706.92785.qmail@web53803.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.9.155.250] by web53803.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:17:06 PST Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:17:06 -0800 (PST) From: Gregor Mosheh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: 4.10 USB problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 02:17:07 -0000 I've been using 4.10 and the EHCI driver, for an external hard drive, for several months and just recently a USB-related problem has started. When the drive is plugged in it is properly recognized by umass, etc. However, attempting to mount the drive results in "/kernel: umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT" being logged to dmesg, and "mount: /dev/da0s1e: Device not configured" Someone suggested that perhaps the problem is having both ehci and uhci in the kernel. This seemed unlikely, since they've both been there all along and it worked. But I was wondering about the need for both the UHCI driver and the EHCI driver. (see dmesg output below) On my system, the startup shows usb0 through usb3 as being uhci, and usb4 as uhci. I think it also shows usb0-3 being grabbed be EHCI, am I reading that right? Still, I have had to run usbd with "-f /dev/usb4" for it to notice the hard drives when they're attached. FWIW, The usbd.conf is the standard-issue one. Is it possible that some USB ports are being grabbed by UHCI and some are being grabbed by EHCI? Would rebuilding the kernel without UHCI cause all of the ports to be EHCI? The ports and harddrives are all USB2 anyway, so USB1 compatibility is not necessary. uhci0: port 0xff80-0xff9f irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xff60-0xff7f irq 10 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xff40-0xff5f irq 9 at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xff20-0xff3f irq 11 at device 29.3 on pci0 usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xffa80800-0xffa80bff irq 5 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb1 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb2 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb3 usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: (0x8086) EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 02:52:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456DB16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:52:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E365A43D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:52:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cjalmond@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so205017rne for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:52:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Z5paUFGhBonSB9VOU+CCKg3Wqe7A8OYGE4tFuoY2SoBtG6QhUkP1q13GpRlwa66nc35Vwo4xOzHjBJd0n+SuXe30BNvgv5qL0PmJB/JQ+cMcHYY38GGLwQB3AX8gqJIqqJo1yRgf/OC4Ix/i6hckGVp/NFLmFh1ked9tqf+7x18= Received: by 10.38.75.52 with SMTP id x52mr116472rna; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.97.21 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:52:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92b67e1b05010518523b6bbcf1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:52:06 -0600 From: Curtis Almond To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <41DBC39B.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <92b67e1b050104152322d7beac@mail.gmail.com> <41DBC39B.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: install.cfg disklabel customization question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Curtis Almond List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 02:52:08 -0000 Good suggestion on using bsdlabel. Unfortunately I am required to use FreeBSD 4.6.2 which does not contain this utility and disklabel requires one to invoke an editor to define the new label. What I resorted to doing was having netboot create /usr100 and then later overwrite the /etc/fstab via an installation package that sets noauto for the label. Curtis On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:38:19 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Curtis Almond wrote: > > > Anyone know how to make /usr100 not mounted at boot time? > > Edit /etc/fstab and add the 'noauto' flag to the appropriate line. > Something like this: > > /dev/ad0s2f /usr100 ufs rw,noauto 2 2 > > > Or even better.... > > How can I create the ad0s2-4 (ad0s2f after boot) label but have > > sysinstall not newfs it during netboot? > > You shouldn't need to recreate the disk or partition labels every time > you reboot, unless you are wiping and re-installing most of the disk > each time. > > If you're using sysinstall(8) to do an automatic install as part of your > netboot process, then as far as I can tell, there's no way using the > scripted interface to tell it to create a UFS partition but not newfs or > mount it -- although that's easy enough using sysinstall interactively. > > I'd be thinking more along the lines of ditching sysinstall(8) entirely > for that purpose and using fdisk(8), bsdlabel(8) and newfs(8) directly. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 8 Dane Court Manor > School Rd > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Tilmanstone > Tel: +44 1304 617253 Kent, CT14 0JL UK > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 03:10:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E733F16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:10:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEC943D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:10:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b191.otenet.gr [212.205.244.199]) j0639sYv009074; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:10:04 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0639Qbo058248; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:09:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0639QVC058247; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:09:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:09:26 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Robert William Vesterman Message-ID: <20050106030926.GA56472@gothmog.gr> References: <41DC9473.6020209@vesterman.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DC9473.6020209@vesterman.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: source control question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:10:15 -0000 On 2005-01-05 20:29, Robert William Vesterman wrote: > Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so > directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a base > assumption that, more or less, "directory" == "project". > > But in reality, a directory could be a project, or part of a > project, or part of many projects, or merely structural > [...] > I'm sure there are ways to bend things like Subversion into kind of > behaving the way I want, but are there any systems that are actually > designed with this concept in mind? AFAICT, any version control system that supports 'views' or 'modules' can do that. You can put pretty much anything in any place you want and then create project based hierarchies of files by pulling parts of the repository under the project directory. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 03:19:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7680416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:19:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272E643D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:19:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j063JaOO063833; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:19:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: "Justin England" Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:19:50 -0500 Message-ID: <6dbpt0t06d771k3sta0pvokdot017sqha0@4ax.com> References: <059701c4f222$d7064a20$152ea8c0@killer> In-Reply-To: <059701c4f222$d7064a20$152ea8c0@killer> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/625/Fri Dec 10 12:41:57 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on clamscanner3 X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware Esclade 7006-2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:19:38 -0000 On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:01:31 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: > >I have downloaded the CLI util and the 3dm2 web interface from 3ware.com= and have been trouble getting them to work. =20 Its not totally obvious, but to connect to the 3dmd2, you need to talk to it via https, not http. So if you have it on the default port of 888, try https://127.0.0.1 and not http://127.0.0.1 > >My question is mainly on the driver though. Which should I use? =20 The 3ware folk keep the driver in the source tree up to date. So use it, not the one from the website. ---Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 03:31:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68A516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:31:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from addr14.addr.com (addr14.addr.com [209.249.147.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABAE43D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:31:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markski@addr14.addr.com) Received: from addr14.addr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])j063VJ60031362 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from markski@localhost) by addr14.addr.com (8.12.8/8.12.7/Submit) id j063VJ6j031360 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:31:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:31:19 -0800 From: Mark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050105193119.A29486@logik.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i X-ADDRSpamFilter: Passed, probability (0%) X-ADDRSignature: E8125FC Subject: Uptime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:31:21 -0000 I realise this may be the wrong list to post to, but it *is* a question and it *is* about FreeBSD... :) http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html So, we know BSD is capable of stupidly high uptime, but what I'd like to know is how? I mean, we all have to patch things now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels, or is there some black magic going on that I don't know about? I await your theories... :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 03:41:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB9B16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:41:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E187C43D55 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:41:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@ec.rr.com) Received: from BARTON (cpe-065-184-201-054.ec.rr.com [65.184.201.54]) j063fN4R028463 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:41:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:46:17 +0000 From: jason henson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <56BC8436-5E81-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> In-Reply-To: <56BC8436-5E81-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> (from lists@tntluoma.com on Tue Jan 4 13:49:18 2005) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.2.6 Message-Id: <1104983177l.7234l.0l@BARTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:41:27 -0000 You are welcome! The script seems to be a little dated. Entry 20041010 in /usr/src/UPDATING says you don't need KEYWORD: FreeBSD, and =20 I think there are some other updates to the format too. The old ones =20 will continue to be supported for now. On 01/04/05 13:49:18, Timothy Luoma wrote: >=20 > This outlines some extra steps I had to take to setup an iTunes =20 > server in FreeBSD 5.3 >=20 > I followed the instructions at =20 > http://home.introweb.nl/~dodger/itunesserver.html >=20 > There are a few notes (I suspect those instructions are a bit old/=20 > outdated in a few places): >=20 > ORIGINAL TEXT: > "Now you'll have to download Rendezvous.tar.gz from Apple. Go to =20 > http://www.opensource.apple.com/projects/rendezvous/source/Rendezvous.tar= .gz, =20 > register and download the file to the directory /usr/ports/distfiles. =20 > After doing this, go back to /usr/ports/net/rendezvous (if needed) =20 > and type:" >=20 > CORRECTION: > Rendezvous is now found at /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-Rendezvous >=20 > [Thanks to Jason Henson for pointing this out to me] >=20 >=20 > NEW #1: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/mDNSResponder.sh didn't exist, so I =20 > copied it from /usr/ports/net/mDNSResponder/files/mDNSResponder.sh. =20 > Then I had to manually edit the file. Mine now looks like this: >=20 > #!/bin/sh >=20 > # PROVIDE: mDNSResponder > # REQUIRE: NETWORKING > # KEYWORD: FreeBSD >=20 > . /etc/rc.subr >=20 > name=3DmDNSResponder > rcvar=3D`set_rcvar` >=20 > # CHANGE THIS to wherever it is installed > # It used to be installed to /usr/local/sbin/ > command=3D/usr/local/bin/mDNSResponder >=20 > # DON'T change this here. Change it in /etc/rc.conf > mDNSResponder_enable=3D${mDNSResponder_enable:-"NO"} >=20 > # OLD: These flags no longer seem to work (2005-01-04) > #mDNSResponder_flags=3D${mDNSResponder_flags:-"-b -n `/bin/hostname -=20 > s`"} >=20 > pidfile=3D"/var/run/mDNSResponder.pid" >=20 > load_rc_config $name > run_rc_command "$1" >=20 > #EOF >=20 >=20 > NEW #2: >=20 > I added these lines to /etc/rc.conf: >=20 > daapd_enable=3D"YES" > mDNSResponder_enable=3D"YES" >=20 >=20 > FYI: here are the config files as I have them >=20 > $ cat /usr/local/etc/mDNSResponder.conf > FreeBSD iTunes server > _daap._tcp. >=20 > 3689 >=20 > $ cat /usr/local/etc/daapd.conf > Port 3689 > ServerName daapd server > DBName FreeBSD iTunes server > Password > Root /usr/home/itunes > Cache > Timescan 2 > RescanInterval 0 >=20 >=20 > NOTE: I had to restart the FreeBSD system to get it to show up in =20 > iTunes. Doesn't seem like it ought to be necessary, but it was for =20 > me. >=20 > I think those were all the steps I had to take. >=20 > I hope this will help anyone else who is trying to do the same. >=20 > TjL >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-=20 > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 03:43:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FF416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:43:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8818143D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:43:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j063e1oT059129 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:40:01 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DCB3C4.1070203@vilot.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:43:00 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050105193119.A29486@logik.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20050105193119.A29486@logik.ath.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Uptime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:43:03 -0000 Mark wrote: >So, we know BSD is capable of stupidly high uptime, but what >I'd like to know is how? I mean, we all have to patch things >now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these >sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels,... > > Yep!! (AFAIK) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 03:45:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D547C16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:45:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A831943D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:45:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 34EC95333C; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:46:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:46:13 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mark Message-ID: <20050106034613.GA42917@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050105193119.A29486@logik.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050105193119.A29486@logik.ath.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Uptime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:45:40 -0000 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 07:31:19PM -0800, Mark wrote: > I realise this may be the wrong list to post to, but it *is* > a question and it *is* about FreeBSD... :) >=20 > http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html >=20 > So, we know BSD is capable of stupidly high uptime, but what > I'd like to know is how? I mean, we all have to patch things > now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these > sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels, or is > there some black magic going on that I don't know about? The former, mostly. Kris --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3LSEWry0BWjoQKURAhklAKCkMblUXO/Nb6qPmgSRUfab1+rwoQCfSbTW r+WuKKHdpSO5u+okPk4BUsI= =0uhb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:06:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C6316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:06:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F09343D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:06:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from corten8.billschoolcraft.com ([63.204.157.14]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:06:21 -0800 Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:06:25 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Schoolcraft X-X-Sender: bill@corten8.billschoolcraft.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050105112031.54f063f9.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Message-ID: System-ID: [en] (I; Linux i86pc) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Epson Stylus C84 printer setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:06:33 -0000 At Wed, 5 Jan 2005 it looks like Miguel Mendez composed: > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:10:46 -0800 > "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: > > Hi, > > A bit OT but wanted to throw my $0.02 anyway... > > > CUPS is unnecessary. unnecessary software complicates the machine > > and makes it harder to troubleshoot. I don't personally care much > > for this. > > I don't understand where all this animosity against CUPS comes from, but > it's not the first time I've seen people flaming against it. If you > don't like it, don't use it. CUPS is very easy to troubleshoot, perhaps > you didn't bother reading the man pages. Enable debugging log mode and > read the logs, all the info is there. > > Setting up my USB laserprinter takes 10 seconds with CUPS. Drop the ppd > file, point the browser at localhost:631 and configure the printer. > Done. The computer is a tool to get the job done, and most people have > better things to do than spend more time than needed setting up their > printer. It's also worth mentioning that Samba 3.x and CUPS integreate > seamlessly. I must chime in here. I was bragging about how, on the first try, I got CUPS to print with "Solaris-8 (x86)" from my Netscape browser. I don't want to start a flame war but anyone who's tried to get "ink jet" printers to work _first_try_ on Solaris(x86) will probably be nodding their heads in agreement. NOW, I also totally concur with KIS[s] and the reasons for not getting too heavy into overhead. Hell, I still prefer PINE as my MUA just because it was the first one I ever used on Unix. Namaste -- |<----------------------"Word-Wrap-At-72-Please"---------------------->| Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 -o) San Francisco CA 94121 /\ "UNIX, A Way Of Life." _\_v http://billschoolcraft.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:14:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5483A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:14:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from addr14.addr.com (addr14.addr.com [209.249.147.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD2B43D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:14:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markski@addr14.addr.com) Received: from addr14.addr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])j064ED60043798 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: (from markski@localhost) by addr14.addr.com (8.12.8/8.12.7/Submit) id j064EDsd043796 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:14:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:14:13 -0800 From: Mark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i X-ADDRSpamFilter: Passed, probability (0%) X-ADDRSignature: 7F33EC0 Subject: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:14:15 -0000 Urgh, it was all going so well. I suppose it had to happen: I did as the hallowed handbook commanded: #make buildworld #make buildkernel KERNCONF=L004 #make installkernel I rebooted into single user mode: #mount -a #cd /usr/src #mergemaster -p #make installworld (setting of variables omitted, i'm typing from the screen!) /tmp/install.XXXXXXXX make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall make: Permission denied ***Error code 126 Stop in /usr/src ***Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src Any ideas? AFAIK my permissions are still at their defaults. Apologies for any major errors I may have unwittingly made, this is my first buildworld. Please tell me my setup is NOT ruined, it still had that two-week-old-fresh-install feel to it and I had everything just how I like it. Putting on a brave face. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:28:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBEB16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:28:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9C843D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:27:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (dsl093-180-184.sac1.dsl.speakeasy.net[66.93.180.184]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with ESMTP id <20050106042752113005pka7e> (Authid: jayobrien@att.net); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:27:52 +0000 Message-ID: <41DCBE47.4070402@att.net> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:27:51 -0800 From: Jay O'Brien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: grep help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:28:09 -0000 I want to look at all of the lines in a FreeBSD log file that do not have an entry from an IP, example 1.2.3.4. Some basic help with the use of grep would be appreciated. This is one of the arguments I've tried that didn't work: grep ^[^1.2.3.4]*$ logfile.log Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, California USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:31:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816F716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:31:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (caliban.rospa.ca [24.72.10.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3866E43D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:31:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8CB7A112; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:31:54 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:31:54 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: FreeBSD - questions Message-ID: <20050106043154.GI42299@seekingfire.com> References: <41DCBE47.4070402@att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DCBE47.4070402@att.net> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68 F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/personal/gpg_key.asc X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers X-Tillman-rules: yes he does User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: grep help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:31:55 -0000 On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:27:51PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote: > I want to look at all of the lines in a FreeBSD log file that do not > have an entry from an IP, example 1.2.3.4. Some basic help with the > use of grep would be appreciated. This is one of the arguments I've > tried that didn't work: > > grep ^[^1.2.3.4]*$ logfile.log I like `grep -v` for "not" operations. Also note that "." is itself a special character. grep -v 1\.2\.3\.4 logfile.log might be closer to what you want. -T -- "'Way back, I set myself to be a happy man, and made it." -- Louis Armstrong From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:40:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9D716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:40:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp819.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp819.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEACA43D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:40:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from donaldj1066@fastmail.fm) Received: from unknown (HELO pres7000.mylan.net) (donaldj@ameritech.net@69.211.77.105 with plain) by smtp819.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 04:40:04 -0000 From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:39:49 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501052239.50003.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> Subject: Re: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:40:05 -0000 On Wednesday 05 January 2005 10:14 pm, Mark wrote: > Urgh, it was all going so well. I suppose it had to happen: > > I did as the hallowed handbook commanded: Why aren't you following /usr/src/UPDATING instead, that tends to be more up to date than the handbook. > > #make buildworld > #make buildkernel KERNCONF=L004 > #make installkernel This step should have been: make installkernel KERNCONF=L004 > > I rebooted into single user mode: Why don't you use "shutdown now" instead, that way your put into single user mode with things already mounted. Just accept the standard location of sh, cd into /usr/src and you can finish up. > > #mount -a > #cd /usr/src > #mergemaster -p > #make installworld > (setting of variables omitted, i'm typing from the screen!) > /tmp/install.XXXXXXXX make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall This is something I don't think I've ever seen. Where does it say to do this. I think this is a big problem and once more I would suggest following /usr/src/UPDATING. > make: Permission denied > > ***Error code 126 > Stop in /usr/src > > ***Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/src > > Any ideas? AFAIK my permissions are still at their defaults. > > Apologies for any major errors I may have unwittingly made, > this is my first buildworld. Please tell me my setup is NOT > ruined, it still had that two-week-old-fresh-install feel to > it and I had everything just how I like it. > > Putting on a brave face. Final time: use the method in /usr/src/UPDATING. That's why it's there. Don -- Donald J. O'Neill donaldj1066@fastmail.fm I'm not totally useless, I can be used as a bad example. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:41:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1109816A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:41:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06D143D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:41:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so24768wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:41:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=AIkRmWUUKXj9aAPKeHDoH6orGXV3NdLuLbXPKxVE+/E7CPLo81CNDIcUdEWCfvmePgIhu5b1GmzWFaxhzN1jIDSJlIFGIMx15ciQFy5DvLlAgvg2W7y9X+tRd9d7vkPDkA3cKWIYWEITQtBERq396wODgvN9ULVTm2dy3hXMd/Q= Received: by 10.54.42.56 with SMTP id p56mr78155wrp; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:41:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:41:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:41:29 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Mark In-Reply-To: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:41:31 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:14:13 -0800, Mark wrote: > Urgh, it was all going so well. I suppose it had to happen: > > I did as the hallowed handbook commanded: > > #make buildworld > #make buildkernel KERNCONF=L004 > #make installkernel > > I rebooted into single user mode: > > #mount -a > #cd /usr/src > #mergemaster -p > #make installworld > (setting of variables omitted, i'm typing from the screen!) > /tmp/install.XXXXXXXX make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall > make: Permission denied > > ***Error code 126 > Stop in /usr/src > > ***Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/src After you boot into single-user mode, you should do: # fsck -p # mount -u / ^^^ to remount / read-write # mount -a -tufs ... ... HTH, -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:43:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF0B16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:43:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mi.celestial.com (dagney.celestial.com [192.136.111.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D809143D58 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:43:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: by mail.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 3ABF211E8A6; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:43:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:43:38 -0800 From: Bill Campbell To: FreeBSD - questions Message-ID: <20050106044338.GA89597@alexis.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD - questions References: <41DCBE47.4070402@att.net> <20050106043154.GI42299@seekingfire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050106043154.GI42299@seekingfire.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: grep help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:43:39 -0000 On Wed, Jan 05, 2005, Tillman Hodgson wrote: >On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:27:51PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote: >> I want to look at all of the lines in a FreeBSD log file that do not >> have an entry from an IP, example 1.2.3.4. Some basic help with the >> use of grep would be appreciated. This is one of the arguments I've >> tried that didn't work: >> >> grep ^[^1.2.3.4]*$ logfile.log You should probably single quote the pattern at the '^' character is an archaic synonym for the pipe symbol, and the * may be expanded by the shell. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Systems, Inc. UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``Many citizens because of their respect for what only appears to be a law are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights due to ignorance.'' -- U.S. v. Minker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:43:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2D416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:43:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rooster.chubbo.net (rooster.chubbo.net [168.75.98.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB94043D54 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) Received: from rooster.chubbo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rooster.chubbo.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j064hpR5046931 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:43:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by rooster.chubbo.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id j064hpS2046930 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:43:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) X-Authentication-Warning: rooster.chubbo.net: nobody set sender to freebsd-questions@chubbo.net using -f Received: from c-67-169-93-71.client.comcast.net (c-67-169-93-71.client.comcast.net [67.169.93.71]) by mail.chubbo.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:43:50 -0800 Message-ID: <1104986630.41dcc206e3e4f@mail.chubbo.net> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:43:50 -0800 From: joseph kacmarcik To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41DCBE47.4070402@att.net> In-Reply-To: <41DCBE47.4070402@att.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Subject: Re: grep help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:43:54 -0000 > grep ^[^1.2.3.4]*$ logfile.log to not match, use: grep -v 1.2.3.4 logfile.log -v, --invert-match Invert the sense of matching, to select non-matching lines. when there are multiple patterns you don't want to see, try: egrep -v '1.2.3.4|5.6.7.8' logfile.log joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:45:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05DF16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:45:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FA043D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:45:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from somniosus@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so25219wri for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:45:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=JB6+GYwYEzF4XJDBp+7RG6eMwomtCkPKsjub8KNOHS/NHjTueHYazdvVjVpR16UmkQERfT1z6kkMdwM4jYMSsq3tD0zVXPbfWvTVPMiiM4yPN3MeXxVvii/5bpa06HCQi4Fdiw6eDT587yZziIXxlnGcfbARkKw+FBSQoguUgy4= Received: by 10.54.45.55 with SMTP id s55mr79552wrs; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 20:45:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.14.10 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:45:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:45:25 -0800 From: cape canaveral To: Tillman Hodgson In-Reply-To: <20050106043154.GI42299@seekingfire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41DCBE47.4070402@att.net> <20050106043154.GI42299@seekingfire.com> cc: FreeBSD - questions Subject: Re: grep help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cape canaveral List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:45:26 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:31:54 -0600, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:27:51PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote: > > I want to look at all of the lines in a FreeBSD log file that do not > > have an entry from an IP, example 1.2.3.4. Some basic help with the > > use of grep would be appreciated. This is one of the arguments I've > > tried that didn't work: > > > > grep ^[^1.2.3.4]*$ logfile.log > > I like `grep -v` for "not" operations. Also note that "." is itself a > special character. > > grep -v 1\.2\.3\.4 logfile.log > > might be closer to what you want. > > -T > > -- > "'Way back, I set myself to be a happy man, and made it." > -- Louis Armstrong > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > grep "1.2.3.4" logifle.log works for me (unless you were trying to pull all IPs in the form of a.b.c.d ?) -Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:48:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B2216A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:48:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DA443D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:48:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id j064m6k24790 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:48:06 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:48:05 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200501060115.j061FAgJ015200@mp.cs.niu.edu> Message-ID: References: <200501060115.j061FAgJ015200@mp.cs.niu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:48:11 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Scott Bennett wrote: > Ah. So the troll didn't really expect *anybody* reasonably to > have provided support. It just wanted something to bitch about on this > list. It should go back to the bit bucket it came from. Procmail is your friend. Something like: # # Well-known AOL troll on FreeBSD. # :0: * ^From: .*Tm4528@aol.com /dev/null (Quoted from memory. Usual disclaimers. Worth precisely what you paid for it. Contents may settle during delivery. May contain sharp objects or traces of peanuts. Etc.) -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 04:57:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1D316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:57:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8061A43D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1054A51A48; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:57:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:57:37 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dave Horsfall Message-ID: <20050106045737.GA58777@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200501060115.j061FAgJ015200@mp.cs.niu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 04:57:05 -0000 --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 03:48:05PM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Scott Bennett wrote: >=20 > > Ah. So the troll didn't really expect *anybody* reasonably to=20 > > have provided support. It just wanted something to bitch about on this= =20 > > list. It should go back to the bit bucket it came from. >=20 > Procmail is your friend. Something like: >=20 > # > # Well-known AOL troll on FreeBSD. > # > :0: > * ^From: .*Tm4528@aol.com You need to instead block Tm[0-9]+ because he likes to change his address every few weeks [1]. Kris [1] Perhaps the counter reflects the number of times his AOL account has been deleted. --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3MVBWry0BWjoQKURAjuoAJ9+IXDM3s42x4YnVJVDC3+stK0qAgCgxwqC 4AdG2b8d3qt1N/77b33OdiE= =DuNp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 05:01:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFB116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:01:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from addr14.addr.com (addr14.addr.com [209.249.147.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A51243D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:01:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markski@addr14.addr.com) Received: from addr14.addr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])j0651K60056252 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:01:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from markski@localhost) by addr14.addr.com (8.12.8/8.12.7/Submit) id j0651Kc4056250 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:01:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:01:19 -0800 From: Mark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050105210119.B38777@logik.ath.cx> References: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> <200501052239.50003.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <200501052239.50003.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm>; from Donald J. O'Neill on Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:39:49PM -0600 X-ADDRSpamFilter: Passed, probability (0%) X-ADDRSignature: 2EDC0839 Subject: Re: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:01:22 -0000 > > #make buildworld > > #make buildkernel KERNCONF=L004 > > #make installkernel > > This step should have been: > make installkernel KERNCONF=L004 Sorry, that was a typo on my part. I did in fact run the command you suggested. > Why don't you use "shutdown now" instead, that way your put into single > user mode with things already mounted. Just accept the standard > location of sh, cd into /usr/src and you can finish up. Is it too late for that d'you think? I'm basically moving from 5.3 RELEASE-p2 to p3, will my userland be stable enough to start afresh? > > #mount -a > > #cd /usr/src > > #mergemaster -p > > #make installworld > > > > (setting of variables omitted, i'm typing from the screen!) > > /tmp/install.XXXXXXXX make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall > > This is something I don't think I've ever seen. Where does it say to do > this. I think this is a big problem and once more I would suggest > following /usr/src/UPDATING. I think you may have misunderstood, the /tmp* line is output from the makefile, not a command that I have typed. I have rebooted to clear my head (and /tmp amongst other things) and mounted my partitions (as Joshua suggested) but I still get the same 'permission denied' error. Upon re-checking /usr/src/UPDATING, I've confirmed that it describes the process I am performing to the letter. I'm at a loss currently. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 05:07:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574F316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:07:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE3243D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:07:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (dsl093-180-184.sac1.dsl.speakeasy.net[66.93.180.184]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005010605072411200mhgkue> (Authid: jayobrien@att.net); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:07:25 +0000 Message-ID: <41DCC78B.3080907@att.net> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:07:23 -0800 From: Jay O'Brien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - questions References: <41DCBE47.4070402@att.net> <20050106043154.GI42299@seekingfire.com> In-Reply-To: <20050106043154.GI42299@seekingfire.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: grep help RESOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:07:35 -0000 Tillman Hodgson (and others!)wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:27:51PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote: > >>I want to look at all of the lines in a FreeBSD log file that do not >>have an entry from an IP, example 1.2.3.4. Some basic help with the >>use of grep would be appreciated. This is one of the arguments I've >>tried that didn't work: >> >>grep ^[^1.2.3.4]*$ logfile.log > > > I like `grep -v` for "not" operations. Also note that "." is itself a > special character. > > grep -v 1\.2\.3\.4 logfile.log > > might be closer to what you want. > > -T > > Thank you! The problem I was having was that I completely overlooked the fact that "." needs to be escaped. grep -v 1\.2\.3\.4 logfile.log as you suggested, works fine. I'm looking at an apache access log, and I want to exclude accesses that I made from my IP. Thanks, everyone! Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 05:09:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69BF16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:09:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cedant2.abac.com (cedant2.abac.com [66.175.0.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C245F43D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:09:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@vesterman.com) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (ool-44c40513.dyn.optonline.net [68.196.5.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by cedant2.abac.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0658v0i083798 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:09:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bob@vesterman.com) Message-ID: <41DCCB01.8050409@vesterman.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:22:09 -0500 From: Robert William Vesterman User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41DC9473.6020209@vesterman.com> <20050106030926.GA56472@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20050106030926.GA56472@gothmog.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Subject: Re: source control question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:09:01 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2005-01-05 20:29, Robert William Vesterman wrote: > > >>Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so >>directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a base >>assumption that, more or less, "directory" == "project". >>[...] >> >AFAICT, any version control system that supports 'views' or 'modules' >can do that. You can put pretty much anything in any place you want >and then create project based hierarchies of files by pulling parts of >the repository under the project directory. > > Yes, that's pretty much the concept I'm looking for. Does anyone know of any such version control systems? If cvs, Subversion, or sccs have it, I must have missed it. Thanks, Bob Vesterman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 05:18:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523D916A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:18:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D8943D2D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:18:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id j065Ic024912 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:18:39 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:18:38 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050106045737.GA58777@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: References: <200501060115.j061FAgJ015200@mp.cs.niu.edu> <20050106045737.GA58777@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:18:43 -0000 On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > You need to instead block Tm[0-9]+ because he likes to change his > address every few weeks [1]. Ah, thanks; filter updated accordingly :-) > [1] Perhaps the counter reflects the number of times his AOL account > has been deleted. Indeed, PS: cable.rogers.com filter now removed; they had a *bad* spamming problem a while back, but now the infected boxes are now more-or-less permanently listed in the various DNSBLs. -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 05:28:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCC416A4CE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:28:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC0943D3F; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:28:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.216] (c-24-1-210-118.client.comcast.net[24.1.210.118]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005010605280901500n65e2e>; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:28:10 +0000 Message-ID: <41DCCC60.7060309@computer.org> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:28:00 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , FreeBSD Questions , FreeBSD mobile Mailing List References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> <41DC21DF.30801@computer.org> <20050106004037.GA53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20050106004037.GA53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:28:15 -0000 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Wednesday, 5 January 2005 at 11:20:31 -0600, Eric Schuele wrote: > >>Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> >>>I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number >>>of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. >>>Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me >>>good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal >>>wireless card to work? >> >>My point is... you may have to use the windows drivers with a wrapper to >>get it to work. > > > Yes, that was my suspicion as well, and one of the reasons for my > question. > > >>On the other hand... I've switched to an Atheros based miniPCI card >>which works quite well with 'device ath'. I can give you a link if >>your interested. > > > Thanks, but no. I have wireless cards here. I was wondering about > the onboard card. I was referring to the internal onboard (miniPCI) card. You could purchase the laptop without one (if that's an option) and then drop in your own. I chose an Atheros based one... but there are Prism based ones floating around as well. > > >>So you might dig around and try to find out positively whose card >>those miniPCI devices are. > > > That's what I'm trying to do, and also (if possible) get more details > about how to get them running. I can give you very specific instruction on how I got the 1300 (Broadcom) working with 5.2.1... but I don't think thats what your after. > > Greg > -- > See complete headers for address and phone numbers. -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 05:41:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF1A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:41:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D3843D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:41:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b191.otenet.gr [212.205.244.199]) j065fjYE004406; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:41:46 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j065fiNJ040695; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:41:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j065fguO040694; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:41:42 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:41:41 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Robert William Vesterman Message-ID: <20050106054141.GA40634@gothmog.gr> References: <41DC9473.6020209@vesterman.com> <20050106030926.GA56472@gothmog.gr> <41DCCB01.8050409@vesterman.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DCCB01.8050409@vesterman.com> cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: source control question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:41:50 -0000 On 2005-01-06 00:22, Robert William Vesterman wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2005-01-05 20:29, Robert William Vesterman wrote: >>>Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so >>>directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a base >>>assumption that, more or less, "directory" == "project". >> >>AFAICT, any version control system that supports 'views' or 'modules' >>can do that. You can put pretty much anything in any place you want >>and then create project based hierarchies of files by pulling parts of >>the repository under the project directory. > > Yes, that's pretty much the concept I'm looking for. Does anyone know > of any such version control systems? If cvs, Subversion, or sccs have > it, I must have missed it. Yes, CVS has modules. The Texinfo documentation is a bit awkward to browse, but if you are interested in finding out how modules can be used to create arbitrary `collections' of files, see: % info '(cvs)' Look for the section titled ``The modules file''. The most interesting part of this is probably the description of the -a option, in the subsection ``Alias modules''. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 05:48:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B01B16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:48:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF67743D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:48:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j065k6dP002780; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:46:06 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:48:10 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> <200501052239.50003.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> In-Reply-To: <200501052239.50003.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501052148.11004.kstewart@owt.com> cc: "Donald J. O'Neill" Subject: Re: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:48:15 -0000 On Wednesday 05 January 2005 08:39 pm, Donald J. O'Neill wrote: > On Wednesday 05 January 2005 10:14 pm, Mark wrote: > > Urgh, it was all going so well. I suppose it had to happen: > > > > I did as the hallowed handbook commanded: > > Why aren't you following /usr/src/UPDATING instead, that tends to be > more up to date than the handbook. > > > #make buildworld > > #make buildkernel KERNCONF=L004 > > #make installkernel > > This step should have been: > make installkernel KERNCONF=L004 > > > I rebooted into single user mode: > > Why don't you use "shutdown now" instead, that way your put into > single user mode with things already mounted. Just accept the > standard location of sh, cd into /usr/src and you can finish up. The whole purpose for the boot into single user mode is to test the new kernel before you are fully dedicated to the upgrade. There are rare occasions when the new kernel will panick and you can boot kernel.old really easy and your system will run as if nothing is wrong until you figure out what is broken. Kent > > > #mount -a > > #cd /usr/src > > #mergemaster -p > > #make installworld > > > > > > (setting of variables omitted, i'm typing from the screen!) > > /tmp/install.XXXXXXXX make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall > > This is something I don't think I've ever seen. Where does it say to > do this. I think this is a big problem and once more I would suggest > following /usr/src/UPDATING. > > > make: Permission denied > > > > ***Error code 126 > > Stop in /usr/src > > > > ***Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src > > > > Any ideas? AFAIK my permissions are still at their defaults. > > > > Apologies for any major errors I may have unwittingly made, > > this is my first buildworld. Please tell me my setup is NOT > > ruined, it still had that two-week-old-fresh-install feel to > > it and I had everything just how I like it. > > > > Putting on a brave face. > > Final time: use the method in /usr/src/UPDATING. That's why it's > there. > > Don -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 05:48:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD1716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:48:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA3E43D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:48:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.216] (c-24-1-210-118.client.comcast.net[24.1.210.118]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20050106054847011003a2ice>; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:48:48 +0000 Message-ID: <41DCD136.1080201@computer.org> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:48:38 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Vilot References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> <41DC21DF.30801@computer.org> <41DC8FF5.9040001@vilot.com> In-Reply-To: <41DC8FF5.9040001@vilot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:48:51 -0000 Tom Vilot wrote: > Eric Schuele wrote: > >> On the other hand... I've switched to an Atheros based miniPCI card >> which works quite well with 'device ath'. I can give you a link if >> your interested. > > > > I might be interested in one of those. I have a Dell Inspiron 8200. I purchased mine from: http://www.pcdgloabl.com Which as luck would have it is within a mile of my office. So I just drove over there. DO NOTE: They have no return policy, as they prefer to cater to OEMs. But I've been very happy with mine. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 06:33:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DE216A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:33:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2E143D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:33:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so22338rne for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:33:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index:message-id; b=YfHgEPLY8DAPLbcYxb3/+gXYundzK9iJbml3apR98xOsrhrkWE4sU4b6sSXi9nbyaXWpWDx6j2cqNW34AldyHGNZaRoC3IlzrL3wngX4RMwBqvgT8ReKGuZvDncG4BRJe95H6T7grbjd/ZjOVPj6rmVLveofGfPNr87XtMMxWts= Received: by 10.39.2.11 with SMTP id e11mr20860rni; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:33:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix ([220.225.80.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 70sm732958rnc.2005.01.05.22.33.20; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:33:21 -0800 (PST) From: "Subhro" To: "'Mark'" , Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:03:15 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01C4F3E7.B2F96420" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcTzpkkdAxQAMGjwSmqXPPCQGNc7NAAEzc4g Message-ID: <41dcdbb1.45f7dec1.0516.348f@smtp.gmail.com> Subject: RE: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:33:23 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C4F3E7.B2F96420 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mark > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:44 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: make installworld - permission denied > > Urgh, it was all going so well. I suppose it had to happen: > > I did as the hallowed handbook commanded: > > #make buildworld > #make buildkernel KERNCONF=L004 > #make installkernel > > I rebooted into single user mode: > > #mount -a > #cd /usr/src > #mergemaster -p > #make installworld > (setting of variables omitted, i'm typing from the screen!) > /tmp/install.XXXXXXXX make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall > make: Permission denied > > ***Error code 126 > Stop in /usr/src > > ***Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/src > > Any ideas? AFAIK my permissions are still at their defaults. > > Apologies for any major errors I may have unwittingly made, > this is my first buildworld. Please tell me my setup is NOT > ruined, it still had that two-week-old-fresh-install feel to > it and I had everything just how I like it. > > Putting on a brave face. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" sysctl kern.securelevel ? Indian Institute of Information Technology Subhro Sankha Kar Block AQ-13/1, Sector V Salt Lake City PIN 700091 India ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C4F3E7.B2F96420 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJ4TCCAj0w ggGmAhEAzbp/VvDf5LxU/iKss3KqVTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFADBfMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUG A1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVibGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2Vy dGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwHhcNOTYwMTI5MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgwODAxMjM1OTU5WjBfMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVi bGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0A MIGJAoGBAOUZv22jVmEtmUhx9mfeuY3rt56GgAqRDvo4Ja9GiILlc6igmyRdDR/MZW4MsNBWhBiH mgabEKFz37RYOWtuwfYV1aioP6oSBo0xrH+wNNePNGeICc0UEeJORVZpH3gCgNrcR5EpuzbJY1zF 4Ncth3uhtzKwezC6Ki8xqu6jZ9rbAgMBAAEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQADgYEATD+4i8Zo3+5DMw5d 6abLB4RNejP/khv0Nq3YlSI2aBFsfELM85wuxAc/FLAPT/+Qknb54rxK6Y/NoIAK98Up8YIiXbix 3YEjo3slFUYweRb46gVLlH8dwhzI47f0EEA8E8NfH1PoSOSGtHuhNbB7Jbq4046rPzidADQAmPPR cZQwggNmMIICz6ADAgECAhANi0/uqtIYW/R1ap0p4X/7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAMF8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjE3MDUGA1UECxMuQ2xhc3MgMSBQdWJsaWMg UHJpbWFyeSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw05ODA1MTIwMDAwMDBaFw0wODA1MTIy MzU5NTlaMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1 c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNv cnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJ bmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC7WkSKBBa7Vf0DeootlE8VeDa4DUqyb5xUv7zodyqdufBou5XZMUFweoFL uUgTVi3HCOGEQqvAopKrRFyqQvCCDgLpL/vCO7u+yScKXbawNkIztW5UiE+HSr8Z2vkV6A+Hthzj zMaajn9qJJLj/OBluqexfu/J2zdqyErICQbkmQIDAQABo4G0MIGxMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIB BjA1BgNVHR8ELjAsMCqgKKAmhiRodHRwOi8vY3JsLnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9wY2ExLjEuMS5jcmww RwYDVR0gBEAwPjA8BgtghkgBhvhFAQcBATAtMCsGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29t L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBMA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8CAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AgUAA4GBAEJ8Dt+MeUysvwjsTVUvUImgxV5OLl6VMpt5rWURCxxKUsTVqDEhjt4Qm2wIxQfmA7nn yDR4CQnyvAZC+FqMg9GK3qoi9dnjIdLPZYwGM7DNILIzzQq9PuGdwTWpZLCnpSRb6fFo6xPEfDf0 lGQNmsW9MxfvgzOgPuWqPq7Ycx+tMIIEMjCCA5ugAwIBAgIQOo5O0s00DtVmctud5DTy6zANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQUFADCBzDEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNVBAsTFlZlcmlTaWdu IFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVwb3NpdG9yeS9SUEEg SW5jb3JwLiBCeSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxSDBGBgNVBAMTP1ZlcmlTaWduIENsYXNzIDEg Q0EgSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBTdWJzY3JpYmVyLVBlcnNvbmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDAeFw0wNDExMTEw MDAwMDBaFw0wNTA3MTgyMzU5NTlaMIIBEjEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNV BAsTFlZlcmlTaWduIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVw b3NpdG9yeS9SUEEgSW5jb3JwLiBieSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxHjAcBgNVBAsTFVBlcnNv bmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDE0MDIGA1UECxMrRGlnaXRhbCBJRCBDbGFzcyAxIC0gTWljcm9zb2Z0 IEZ1bGwgU2VydmljZTETMBEGA1UEAxQKU3ViaHJvIEthcjEjMCEGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYUc3ViaHJv LmthckBnbWFpbC5jb20wgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAKzp0P4Gh5arpymZu4cW FUb1gQ+qcJtb5B788xi2oskigeKdCgj9tiw5VdAW2rXoOO435Ch2mjBylJb49TFDfy636Fw0F5ij VuyIwtVQQANoiMICBZ8MIZyrBSK9/PyoHeITsnIoCucE4qYGkLL3CYzijoU/iZGwAS0iif7H2jJL AgMBAAGjgcswgcgwCQYDVR0TBAIwADBEBgNVHSAEPTA7MDkGC2CGSAGG+EUBBxcDMCowKAYIKwYB BQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgWgMB0GA1UdJQQW MBQGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDAjAUBgpghkgBhvhFAQYHBAYWBE5vbmUwMwYDVR0fBCwwKjAo oCagJIYiaHR0cDovL2NybC52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vY2xhc3MxLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOB gQBdijWu576noKjQbr0tQSROebsGab9JvR9rh3t9WagovURLjgi6zX/U6IxUSEXi4ECXtSZtEFpL 6yNUq+/mxEXvG7RX0Pe0T5iULmJxxrzO3Qvnc0UJJHKaYd5F4JD3c6YanGjwx3vDEfDQT8pzxHtb PXp6n18sFnbfiFG0ytSKPjGCBD4wggQ6AgEBMIHhMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5j LjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWdu LmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UE AxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3Qg VmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggKyMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzEL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA1MDEwNjA2MzMxM1owIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYE FKxVAh2u5mA+2LN9VYfzKVYSgUetMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZI hvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIa MAoGCCqGSIb3DQIFMIHyBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgeQwgeEwgcwxFzAVBgNVBAoTDlZlcmlTaWduLCBJ bmMuMR8wHQYDVQQLExZWZXJpU2lnbiBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz13d3cudmVyaXNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBIEluY29ycC4gQnkgUmVmLixMSUFCLkxURChjKTk4MUgwRgYD VQQDEz9WZXJpU2lnbiBDbGFzcyAxIENBIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3Vic2NyaWJlci1QZXJzb25hIE5v dCBWYWxpZGF0ZWQCEDqOTtLNNA7VZnLbneQ08uswgfQGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYHkoIHhMIHMMRcw FQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4s TElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1 YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIGAZdY+GGY3uOqCON2sjtvMsTsewr8VqRR5MfDt4W/XKwAiN3DqoQ/TM9q16yLdfI9R lTIiwn3mU2KqmrLqvtL6svXNWLoRu3MVGQMuwj/PU7+YwI75vk8GeAbajprmYBOijZ2uMmkvY/Eg pi+ELL+aLzjnpQKP1Wsg1yjm30n+BQcAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01C4F3E7.B2F96420-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 06:44:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE28D16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:44:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3417843D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:44:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j066iCj32383; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:44:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Boris Spirialitious" , Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:44:12 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050105165001.89003.qmail@web61306.mail.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:44:14 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Boris > Spirialitious > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:50 AM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD > > > One system cost me 3 months salary in Russia. Is this how you > treat your users? Why can't your developer use the machine they > used to make 5.3 work? > YOU are not PAYING the FreeBSD developers to develop for your particular SuperMicro motherboard. If you were, then you would have a leg to stand on. Since you are not purchasing FreeBSD, there does NOT exist any kind of implied warranty or fitness for merchantability between the developers and you, and therefore the developers don't owe you anything. > Everyone tell me to use LINUX. Now I know why. You support bad > slow version and not good one. Very stupid people. > Unless you were paying RedHat or another Linux distributor the situation is exactly the same there as well. I would guess that if -I- had one of these motherboards that I would have no problems running FreeBSD on it. So far I've not heard anything specific from anyone on how it works more slowly on SuperMicro boards. For all we know the people seeing it run slow are running beta copies that were compiled with all the debugging code turned on, or they are running the GENERIC kernel instead of custom-compiling their own. I should also point out as well that FreeBSD 5.X is probably going to be slower in any case than FreeBSD 4.X simply because the kernel does more so it's bigger. FreeBSD 4.X was slower than 3.X and 3.X was slower than 2.X, and so on. All of this was because the demand from the userbase is for more and more features to be added into FreeBSD over the years, not fewer and fewer features. And adding more features to software makes it bigger, and bigger code runs slower in general because there's more instructions for the procesor to go through. All of this of course is relative since many parts of FreeBSD 5 are more efficient than 4 - and if your software app happens to use one of those bits a lot, then it's going to run faster. But if your software apps use bits of FreeBSD that in 4.X were already optimal, then you probably won't see a speed increase. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 06:57:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE0A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:57:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01AC43D2D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:57:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j066vMj32456; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:57:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 22:57:22 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:57:23 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Anthony > Atkielski > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 5:53 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > Tom Vilot writes: > > TV> I prefer to use just about any other tool (except, of course, for > TV> JSP/.NET, etc). Python, Perl, ... any other tool will do the jobs I > TV> need done and I can avoid the sluggishness of Java, the licensing > TV> ambiguities, and the dependence on a company that is *not* a > TV> software company to begin with! > > I tend to agree. Are people still using Java? Keep in mind that Sun's main Java push was into micro-code for embedded devices, that is why Java was written in the first place. It is only later that they got the idea to play in the PC realm - whereupon they ran up against Microsoft, sparks flew, and Sun got a whole lot of publicity. This is common with companies that Microsoft announces that they hate. ;-) Today there's a lot of commercial software development interest in Java. We don't see this much in Open Source because people tend to use tools on the Open Source side that make sense for the job they are doing. On the corporate side of the house, people sometimes are forced to use tools that some salesmanager or CEO has decided need to be used, and if they don't like that their jobs are outsourced to India. Sun is big and has a lot of money and if your a company that announces you have a Java software item you can get some of that marketing muscle to spill over and help you push your product. If FreeBSD can get a current binary JRE distributed then it helps out those companies that use FreeBSD that have applications like that which they are attempting to sell, without bothering the rest of us who aren't in this boat. In this case why not make friends with them when it costs you nothing? Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 07:09:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D6916A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:09:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFD543D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:09:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j0679Lj32501; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:09:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:09:21 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <30.694ba972.2f0ddd70@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:09:24 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tm4528@aol.com > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 4:17 PM > To: tedm@toybox.placo.com > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD > > > In a message dated 1/4/05 11:50:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, > tedm@toybox.placo.com writes: > > None of the new Supermicro hardware I've tried works with Freebsd > > 4.10 properly. I've seen that this has been reported by others. > > They are all based on the 7520 and 7530 Intel chips. 5.3 works > > ok, but a 3.4/800 processor on 5.3 is slower than a 3.06/533 > > processor on our old 7502 chipset based system with 4.9. What can > > be done? > > >Donate one of the systems to a FreeBSD kernel developer. > > > >Ted > > Do you really have no contacts at SM or Dell? What kind of a development > org has no contacts with major vendors? It's not a question of not having contacts. It's a question of actually defining the problem in a way that a developer can get a fix on it. Currently, this is done with the PR mechanism on FreeBSD.org. Doing a search of this shows only PR i386/72579, which claims FreeBSD 4.X doesen't work at all on this chipset, which is contrary to what the OP was saying. I would assume if the OP actually read the instructions in the handbook about how to go about filing a good bug report that they might possibly get some assistance. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 07:11:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C453616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:11:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 9.hellooperator.net (cpc3-cdif2-3-0-cust202.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.32.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B93743D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:11:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputin@hellooperator.net) Received: from rasputin by 9.hellooperator.net with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CmRoG-0006CS-9s for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:11:52 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:11:52 +0000 From: Dick Davies To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20050106071152.GF12003@lb.tenfour> References: <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Dick Davies Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:11:53 -0000 * Ted Mittelstaedt [0157 06:57]: > > Tom Vilot writes: > > I tend to agree. Are people still using Java? > Keep in mind that Sun's main Java push was into micro-code for embedded > devices, that is why Java was written in the first place. And somehow this mutated into J2EE.... :D > ..... On the corporate side of the house, people sometimes > are forced to use tools that some salesmanager or CEO has decided > need to be used, and if they don't like that their jobs are outsourced > to India. The phrase 'Java is the COBOL of the nineties' springs to mind.... > If FreeBSD can get a current binary JRE distributed then it helps > out those companies that use FreeBSD that have applications like that > which they are attempting to sell, without bothering the rest of > us who aren't in this boat. In this case why not make friends with > them when it costs you nothing? I don't think it does cost the Foundation nothing, that's the trouble. You spend years jumping through hoops to get the certification (the only benefit of which is it pleases the managers) and then they turn round and make you do it again. With this attitude it's hardly suprising they piss some people off (especially when the product you're doing all this for is pretty second rate when compared to python or ruby imo)... -- 'Yeah, well I'm gonna build my own themepark! With blackjack aaand Hookers! Actually, forget the park. And the blackjack.' -- Bender Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 07:22:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E5916A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:22:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from addr14.addr.com (addr14.addr.com [209.249.147.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93B043D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:22:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markski@addr14.addr.com) Received: from addr14.addr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])j067Mc60020351 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:22:39 -0800 (PST) Received: (from markski@localhost) by addr14.addr.com (8.12.8/8.12.7/Submit) id j067McPc020349 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:22:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:22:38 -0800 From: Mark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050105232238.A19490@logik.ath.cx> References: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> <41dcdbb1.45f7dec1.0516.348f@smtp.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <41dcdbb1.45f7dec1.0516.348f@smtp.gmail.com>; from Subhro on Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:03:15PM +0530 X-ADDRSpamFilter: Passed, probability (0%) X-ADDRSignature: 1C133 Subject: Re: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:22:41 -0000 > kern.securelevel? kern.securelevel = 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 07:25:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D5716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:25:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay102-f19.bay102.hotmail.com [64.4.61.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BA043D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sangokoub@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:25:21 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 83.115.246.193 by by102fd.bay102.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:24:44 GMT X-Originating-IP: [83.115.246.193] X-Originating-Email: [sangokoub@hotmail.com] X-Sender: sangokoub@hotmail.com From: "k o u b" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:24:44 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2005 07:25:21.0199 (UTC) FILETIME=[E146A3F0:01C4F3C0] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Can'tping between FreeBSD and Win2K... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:25:21 -0000 IPFW is initialized without any setup in the rc.conf file??? I was used the mini-install... it's automaticaly enable after installation?? TIA Mrachik. koub. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 07:25:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7509516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:25:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B73343D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:25:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j067PPj32567; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:25:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Dick Davies" , "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:25:25 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050106071152.GF12003@lb.tenfour> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:25:33 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Dick Davies > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 11:12 PM > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > If FreeBSD can get a current binary JRE distributed then it helps > > out those companies that use FreeBSD that have applications like that > > which they are attempting to sell, without bothering the rest of > > us who aren't in this boat. In this case why not make friends with > > them when it costs you nothing? > > I don't think it does cost the Foundation nothing, that's the > trouble. You > spend years jumping through hoops to get the certification (the > only benefit > of which is it pleases the managers) and then they turn round > and make you > do it again. > Hmm - sounds like what Microsoft does. > With this attitude it's hardly suprising they piss some people > off (especially > when the product you're doing all this for is pretty second rate > when compared > to python or ruby imo)... > Name of the game with commercialized technology which is filled with example after of example of second and 3rd rater products that win the market from 1st rater products merely because their marketing is better. Let's see, in automotive we have lap&shoulder belts vs 5 point harnesses, or for that matter airbags vs seatbelts, in television we have Betamax vs VHS, in computing we have Windows vs Mac, NT vs OS/2, Linux vs FreeBSD ... ;-) Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 07:58:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE7216A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:58:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2613C43D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:58:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so25868rnf for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:58:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index:message-id; b=WT1sL6YqA4qQ2SG+3RfzLfrNbtlbEoyALoCDLmRfh5PbFfIvtOhGVXEGrmGoDJO3VB7oN2uXRzwPkv/ZfbrOdfKPyyO3+viY0ivnlkhTazsohQh2mbx+XDEgh8eO6+4zWHfsniRx25hWL3Bd9yt/akMaS/Hv5efLLdMuTMUHxuc= Received: by 10.38.11.49 with SMTP id 49mr424455rnk; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:58:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix ([220.225.80.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 71sm56222rnb.2005.01.05.23.58.09; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:58:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Subhro" To: "'Mark'" , Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:28:04 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000B_01C4F3F3.8C9712D0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050105232238.A19490@logik.ath.cx> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcTzwJ3Nm6Bi9Ty3S8KwFdDTtmFCQwABL/0g Message-ID: <41dcef93.60a2a628.2778.065e@smtp.gmail.com> Subject: RE: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:58:12 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C4F3F3.8C9712D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mark > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:53 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: make installworld - permission denied > > > kern.securelevel? > > kern.securelevel = 0 > Cool, now cat /etc/fstab Regards S. Indian Institute of Information Technology Subhro Sankha Kar Block AQ-13/1, Sector V Salt Lake City PIN 700091 India ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C4F3F3.8C9712D0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJ4TCCAj0w ggGmAhEAzbp/VvDf5LxU/iKss3KqVTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFADBfMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUG A1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVibGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2Vy dGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwHhcNOTYwMTI5MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgwODAxMjM1OTU5WjBfMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVi bGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0A MIGJAoGBAOUZv22jVmEtmUhx9mfeuY3rt56GgAqRDvo4Ja9GiILlc6igmyRdDR/MZW4MsNBWhBiH mgabEKFz37RYOWtuwfYV1aioP6oSBo0xrH+wNNePNGeICc0UEeJORVZpH3gCgNrcR5EpuzbJY1zF 4Ncth3uhtzKwezC6Ki8xqu6jZ9rbAgMBAAEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQADgYEATD+4i8Zo3+5DMw5d 6abLB4RNejP/khv0Nq3YlSI2aBFsfELM85wuxAc/FLAPT/+Qknb54rxK6Y/NoIAK98Up8YIiXbix 3YEjo3slFUYweRb46gVLlH8dwhzI47f0EEA8E8NfH1PoSOSGtHuhNbB7Jbq4046rPzidADQAmPPR cZQwggNmMIICz6ADAgECAhANi0/uqtIYW/R1ap0p4X/7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAMF8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjE3MDUGA1UECxMuQ2xhc3MgMSBQdWJsaWMg UHJpbWFyeSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw05ODA1MTIwMDAwMDBaFw0wODA1MTIy MzU5NTlaMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1 c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNv cnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJ bmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC7WkSKBBa7Vf0DeootlE8VeDa4DUqyb5xUv7zodyqdufBou5XZMUFweoFL uUgTVi3HCOGEQqvAopKrRFyqQvCCDgLpL/vCO7u+yScKXbawNkIztW5UiE+HSr8Z2vkV6A+Hthzj zMaajn9qJJLj/OBluqexfu/J2zdqyErICQbkmQIDAQABo4G0MIGxMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIB BjA1BgNVHR8ELjAsMCqgKKAmhiRodHRwOi8vY3JsLnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9wY2ExLjEuMS5jcmww RwYDVR0gBEAwPjA8BgtghkgBhvhFAQcBATAtMCsGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29t L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBMA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8CAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AgUAA4GBAEJ8Dt+MeUysvwjsTVUvUImgxV5OLl6VMpt5rWURCxxKUsTVqDEhjt4Qm2wIxQfmA7nn yDR4CQnyvAZC+FqMg9GK3qoi9dnjIdLPZYwGM7DNILIzzQq9PuGdwTWpZLCnpSRb6fFo6xPEfDf0 lGQNmsW9MxfvgzOgPuWqPq7Ycx+tMIIEMjCCA5ugAwIBAgIQOo5O0s00DtVmctud5DTy6zANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQUFADCBzDEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNVBAsTFlZlcmlTaWdu IFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVwb3NpdG9yeS9SUEEg SW5jb3JwLiBCeSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxSDBGBgNVBAMTP1ZlcmlTaWduIENsYXNzIDEg Q0EgSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBTdWJzY3JpYmVyLVBlcnNvbmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDAeFw0wNDExMTEw MDAwMDBaFw0wNTA3MTgyMzU5NTlaMIIBEjEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNV BAsTFlZlcmlTaWduIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVw b3NpdG9yeS9SUEEgSW5jb3JwLiBieSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxHjAcBgNVBAsTFVBlcnNv bmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDE0MDIGA1UECxMrRGlnaXRhbCBJRCBDbGFzcyAxIC0gTWljcm9zb2Z0 IEZ1bGwgU2VydmljZTETMBEGA1UEAxQKU3ViaHJvIEthcjEjMCEGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYUc3ViaHJv LmthckBnbWFpbC5jb20wgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAKzp0P4Gh5arpymZu4cW FUb1gQ+qcJtb5B788xi2oskigeKdCgj9tiw5VdAW2rXoOO435Ch2mjBylJb49TFDfy636Fw0F5ij VuyIwtVQQANoiMICBZ8MIZyrBSK9/PyoHeITsnIoCucE4qYGkLL3CYzijoU/iZGwAS0iif7H2jJL AgMBAAGjgcswgcgwCQYDVR0TBAIwADBEBgNVHSAEPTA7MDkGC2CGSAGG+EUBBxcDMCowKAYIKwYB BQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgWgMB0GA1UdJQQW MBQGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDAjAUBgpghkgBhvhFAQYHBAYWBE5vbmUwMwYDVR0fBCwwKjAo oCagJIYiaHR0cDovL2NybC52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vY2xhc3MxLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOB gQBdijWu576noKjQbr0tQSROebsGab9JvR9rh3t9WagovURLjgi6zX/U6IxUSEXi4ECXtSZtEFpL 6yNUq+/mxEXvG7RX0Pe0T5iULmJxxrzO3Qvnc0UJJHKaYd5F4JD3c6YanGjwx3vDEfDQT8pzxHtb PXp6n18sFnbfiFG0ytSKPjGCBD4wggQ6AgEBMIHhMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5j LjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWdu LmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UE AxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3Qg VmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggKyMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzEL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA1MDEwNjA3NTgwM1owIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYE FC6/1gPmC3NZX6FZJ3I5uCczKJjPMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZI hvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIa MAoGCCqGSIb3DQIFMIHyBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgeQwgeEwgcwxFzAVBgNVBAoTDlZlcmlTaWduLCBJ bmMuMR8wHQYDVQQLExZWZXJpU2lnbiBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz13d3cudmVyaXNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBIEluY29ycC4gQnkgUmVmLixMSUFCLkxURChjKTk4MUgwRgYD VQQDEz9WZXJpU2lnbiBDbGFzcyAxIENBIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3Vic2NyaWJlci1QZXJzb25hIE5v dCBWYWxpZGF0ZWQCEDqOTtLNNA7VZnLbneQ08uswgfQGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYHkoIHhMIHMMRcw FQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4s TElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1 YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIGAYTpe1WRAO8uk5gBgy/JDgIbNcI6ILSHBLcVVLKRPiNTMfm5FoNKAyX+CH3exmKgD ClT+ZlXmSvk9AGwYAZO9knOQA2IXN4Gf86DJGQ+O3F1Xzgdq/GVygEEepsZdO8Lw2t8DkQ2rLBk6 tIHK4K4e6RwmNSCspnhlPS2N+2mP478AAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C4F3F3.8C9712D0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 07:58:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895B116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:58:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 9.hellooperator.net (cpc3-cdif2-3-0-cust202.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.32.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D7B43D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:58:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputin@hellooperator.net) Received: from rasputin by 9.hellooperator.net with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CmSXS-0005l4-IK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:58:34 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:58:34 +0000 From: Dick Davies To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20050106075834.GG12003@lb.tenfour> References: <20050106071152.GF12003@lb.tenfour> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Dick Davies Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:58:35 -0000 * Ted Mittelstaedt [0125 07:25]: > > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Dick Davies > > > > I don't think it does cost the Foundation nothing, that's the > > trouble. You spend years jumping through hoops to get the certification (the > > only benefit of which is it pleases the managers) and then they turn round > > and make you do it again. > Hmm - sounds like what Microsoft does. I've heard of them - don't they make lawsuits? -- 'Everybody's a jerk. You, me, this jerk.' -- Bender Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 08:02:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC1A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:02:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73FB43D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:02:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j0680bdP009843; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:00:37 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:02:42 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050105201412.A38777@logik.ath.cx> <41dcdbb1.45f7dec1.0516.348f@smtp.gmail.com> <20050105232238.A19490@logik.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20050105232238.A19490@logik.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501060002.42260.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Mark Subject: Re: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:02:47 -0000 On Wednesday 05 January 2005 11:22 pm, Mark wrote: > > kern.securelevel? > > kern.securelevel = 0 > Do you have /tmp setup so that it is "no exec"? Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 08:12:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEFF16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:11:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7568E43D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:11:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so33020rne for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:11:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=bgnu5LDr+r77t8Hc5+ZZpJXibaN18QG6gG78IZutOQi3LL1UxhAhu2K94HQDoX8jOjwvJjw+grHJ0Bu9mclpaOG7FIxI5441zZA7U/If9IddS8qebEjD1fvY3WoW1SPZmr9/g5im0TeIPWTOcwEG7HOwWUZPzVFUecq85I68c6g= Received: by 10.38.208.29 with SMTP id f29mr104693rng; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.66.67 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:11:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <235b800005010600112a659a9e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:11:58 +0200 From: tethys ocean To: J65nko BSD In-Reply-To: <19861fba05010308504edb9229@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <235b800005010300233341def0@mail.gmail.com> <19861fba05010308504edb9229@mail.gmail.com> cc: FreeBSD_Questions Subject: Re: defered mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tethys ocean List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:12:00 -0000 Is it depend on sendmail? As I heard that in Postfix such applications can= do. =C4=B0n configuration file a lot of section about defer mail. indeed it is logical and normal it must send a mail to sender that include an informaion about his mail defered and sendmail try after 3 or more minutes. On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:50:21 +0100, J65nko BSD wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:23:07 +0200, tethys ocean = wrote: > > My problem is about defered mail. On our server sendmail is running > > and sometimes some mail defered. I am researching how I can get > > managed to send defer mail information to senders? I am taking a mail > > from root but sender didnt take a mail that consist "your mail defered > > bla bla bla....so I will take next tree minutes".. is it possible? if > > it is possible how I can manage? > > > > in sendmail.cf > > > > O Timeout.queuereturn=3D2d > > O Timeout.queuewarn=3D4h > > O Timeout.queuewarn.normal=3D4h > > > > mailq > > /var/spool/mqamavis (5 requests) > > -----Q-ID----- --Size-- -----Q-Time----- > > ------------Sender/Recipient----------- > > iBVC8fpT049046- 6361 Fri Dec 31 14:12 > > (host map: lookup (bbscomputer.net): deferred) > > > > iBVCIB9u051147- 6361 Fri Dec 31 14:21 > > (host map: lookup (bbscomputer.net): deferred) > > > > iBVDjmck072838- 19579 Fri Dec 31 15:46 > > (host map: lookup (gesan.com.tr): deferred) > > > > iBV68HLM055154- 30 Fri Dec 31 08:08 > > (host map: lookup (active.net): deferred) > > > > iBVAnlhq030740- 354708 Fri Dec 31 12:49 > > (host map: lookup (jungletree.org): deferred) > > > > Total requests: 5 > > > As far as I can see, there is not much what you can do about it ;) >=20 > $ host bbscomputer.net > ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached >=20 > $ host gesan.com.tr > Host gesan.com.tr not found: 2(SERVFAIL) >=20 > $ host active.net > active.net has address 12.161.44.180 > $ host -t mx active.net > active.net mail is handled by 10 mail.active.net. > $ host mail.active.net > Host mail.active.net not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) >=20 > $ host jungletree.org > Host jungletree.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) >=20 > =3DAdriaan=3D > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 08:38:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E64C16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:38:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3490A43D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:38:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id j068c9e25419 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:38:09 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:38:08 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200501041551.47640.4711@chello.at> Message-ID: References: <200501041551.47640.4711@chello.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:38:13 -0000 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Christian Hiris wrote: > I think the "official" FreeBSD download page is > http://oootranslation.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/ooomisc/FreeBSD/ > All the packages I have seen there are ver. 1.1.3. for various FreeBSD > branches including 5.3. Yes!!! I knew I got it from somewhere when I was on 4.7, but for the life of me I couldn't find it. Thanks. -- Dave, a happy OOo camper again From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 08:52:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE1D16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:52:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CCC43D54 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:52:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id j068qRh25449 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:52:27 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:52:27 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050104205450.GB13991@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: References: <20050103204341.GB26032@xor.obsecurity.org> <86wtutitns.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <41DACF99.50601@taborandtashell.net> <20050104205450.GB13991@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Native 5.3 port of OpenOffice? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:52:31 -0000 On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > 2. You need to install java/jdk14 before you try to build OpenOffice > > (even though this is not listed as a dependency). > > It is, actually. You only need linprocfs in order to build jdk14, > because bootstrapping a java compiler requires a java compiler > (i.e. we use a linux binary jdk). If you already had jdk14 installed > before you tried to build OO, you wouldn't need to compile another > jdk. Ah, that explains it! Thanks. Just like GCC in a way, except GCC doesn't need GCC (last time I built it from scratch) but you *do* have to compile it with itself again. I may as well have another go in that case, although OOo works without it. -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 08:54:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3DE16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:54:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.mccme.ru (ns.mccme.ru [62.117.108.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5711C43D58 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:54:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:emin@mccme.ru [62.117.108.7]) by ns.mccme.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id j0694POY050923 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:04:25 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:54:37 +0300 From: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106085437.GA20461@mccme.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: MCCME Moscow Subject: can't remove directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:54:22 -0000 Hi! some months ago I'm install FreeBSD 5.2.1 on my PC. When I do it I set default partition size. For example /var has 256 Mb. After some time I found that It is too small for me. I move a lot of directory to /usr and make symlinks to it: mkdir /usr/var mv /var/tmp /var/mail /var/log /usr/var cd /var ln -s /usr/var/tmp ln -s /usr/var/mail ln -s /usr/var/log All of this working nice, except one: I cant remove /var/tmp. Only rename working. In this directory placed one "dyeless" directory /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty. How can I remove this directory? I try to fsck -y in single user momde, I trying rm -rf /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty in single user mode with only /var mounted. But All of this useful. -- Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii óÅÎÓÏÒÎÏ ×ÁÛ, å×ÇÅÎÉÊ íÉÎØËÏ×ÓËÉÊ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 08:55:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5610C16A4DE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:55:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from addr14.addr.com (addr14.addr.com [209.249.147.92]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FCE43D58 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:55:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markski@addr14.addr.com) Received: from addr14.addr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])j068tI60069537 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from markski@localhost) by addr14.addr.com (8.12.8/8.12.7/Submit) id j068tI0L069535 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:55:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 00:55:18 -0800 From: Mark To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106005518.A68024@logik.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i X-ADDRSpamFilter: Passed, probability (0%) X-ADDRSignature: 373A23B Subject: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:55:36 -0000 > Do you have /tmp setup so that it is "no exec"? > cat /etc/fstab I think you may have both stumbled onto the cause of the problem. :) /dev/ad3s1e /tmp ufs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,nosymfollow I didn't realise that non-exec /tmp was a no-no. I'll try a rebuild tonight, the system seems stable enough for now, I don't think anything was touched apart from the kernel. Thanks for your help, and I'll see you in eight hours when everything comes to a shuddering halt... :) Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:00:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD51716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:00:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.mccme.ru (ns.mccme.ru [62.117.108.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A0E43D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:00:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:emin@mccme.ru [62.117.108.7]) by ns.mccme.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id j069B0OY051134; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:11:01 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:01:13 +0300 From: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106090113.GB20461@mccme.ru> References: <20050105202329.GA30133@mccme.ru> <19861fba0501051514873eea3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <19861fba0501051514873eea3@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: MCCME Moscow cc: J65nko BSD Subject: Re: sendmail and mbox permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:00:57 -0000 On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:14:05AM +0100, J65nko BSD wrote: " On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:23:29 +0300, Eugene M. Minkovskii wrote: " > Hi. " > " > I use FreeBSD 5.3 and sendmail. When root rechieve the mail, " > mailbox's (/var/mail/root) permission bits has been setted to " > 600. Who and how it does? Can I change this behavior? " > " > -- " For security reasons, the "root" account should not receice any mail. " One of sendmail's alternatives "qmail" will even NEVER send any mail " to the root account. " " Enter an alias for root in "/etc/mail/aliases" and run the "newaliases" command. Yes, I know this reasons, but I want to know what happens. Who change permissions on /var/mail/root. Why I see it in FreeBSD 5.3 and don't see in FreeBSD 5.2.1? What do you mean "don't rechive any mail?" mach daemond, mail to root they reports and I want easy way to reading it. -- Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii óÅÎÓÏÒÎÏ ×ÁÛ, å×ÇÅÎÉÊ íÉÎØËÏ×ÓËÉÊ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:03:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DFC16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:03:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B29443D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j0693Wj32833; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:03:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" , Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:03:31 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050106085437.GA20461@mccme.ru> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: can't remove directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:03:41 -0000 What is the error message when you: cd /var/tmp rm -r temproot as the root user? Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Eugene > M. Minkovskii > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:55 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: can't remove directory > > > Hi! > > some months ago I'm install FreeBSD 5.2.1 on my PC. When I do it > I set default partition size. For example /var has 256 Mb. After > some time I found that It is too small for me. I move a lot of > directory to /usr and make symlinks to it: > > mkdir /usr/var > mv /var/tmp /var/mail /var/log /usr/var > cd /var > ln -s /usr/var/tmp > ln -s /usr/var/mail > ln -s /usr/var/log > > All of this working nice, except one: I cant remove /var/tmp. > Only rename working. In this directory placed one "dyeless" > directory /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty. > > How can I remove this directory? I try to fsck -y in single user > momde, I trying rm -rf /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty in single user > mode with only /var mounted. But All of this useful. > > > -- > Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii > óÅÎÓÏÒÎÏ ×ÁÛ, å×ÇÅÎÉÊ íÉÎØËÏ×ÓËÉÊ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:04:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFD716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:04:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spatula.dreamhost.com (spatula.dreamhost.com [66.33.205.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE4943D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:04:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (user-33qt9bs.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.165.124]) by spatula.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6576317D022; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:04:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20050106075455.GA12754@shark.localdomain> References: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <200501050841.03874.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> <0AAB74E3-5F2E-11D9-BE17-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <20050105185436.GA26559@shark.localdomain> <20050106075455.GA12754@shark.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <03704070-5FC2-11D9-913B-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:04:47 -0500 To: Sergey Zaharchenko X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: modem not responding to mgetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:04:50 -0000 On Jan 6, 2005, at 2:54 AM, Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:44:50AM -0500, > Timothy Luoma probably wrote: >> >> Well I think there's a problem with the modem. I ran the diagnostics >> in Windows. >> >> Complete log here: >> >> http://tntluoma.com/freebsd/usr-pci-modem.txt > > Quoting: > >> & AT+GMM - H.324 video-ready rev. 1.0 >> & U.S. Robotics 56K Fax Win > > Win stands for Windows. ARGH. I'm sure you're right. I had been completely overlooking that. >> Still not clear on the model # the closest I came to finding >> something was this: >> >> Product ID 265699A > > It looks as if it were a 5699A. It's a winmodem. Sounds like it. Oh well, I'll have to see if the local WalMart (our closest thing we have to an electronics store) has an external, non-USB modem. This outta be good. TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:10:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D55216A4E5 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:10:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (fia148-72.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.72.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439FF43D66 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:10:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl) Received: from localhost (colin@localhost) by kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0698P825790; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:08:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:08:24 +0100 From: "Colin J. Raven" To: Rowdy In-Reply-To: <41DC9D9B.9050007@fielden.com.au> Message-ID: References: <000001c4f392$a5175100$1405080e@SigFever.badlandsgang.com> <41DC9D9B.9050007@fielden.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: John W Ward II cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error in burning v5.3 disc 2.iso X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:10:32 -0000 On Jan 6 at 13:08, Rowdy launched this into the bitstream: > John W Ward II wrote: >> I can burn the other downloads but disc2.iso freezes up the system and >> won't >> respond. I have a PIII 1ghz w/512 ram, XPPro and Nero v5 software. I have >> never had a problem burning an iso before and even downloaded the file >> three >> times and twice from different ftp sites. Can you help? >> Thanks, >> John Ward > > disc2 contains a live filesystem, including the ports tree. There are > literally 10's of thousands of files - on my Athlon 64 3200+ it took well > over 15 minutes for Nero to collate the directories before it started > burning. Sorry to jump in on this thread with an ever-so-slight divergence: I too noticed that dic2 was labeled livefs (or something closely akin to that). Does this mean that disc2 is a knoppix-style bootable live OS?? I burned it anyway, admittedly not fully understanding why I was doing this. [slightly ashamed look] I guess I figured that what I didn't then know, I'd learn later. FTR anecdotally, my experience burning disc 2 was entirely different from what was reported above. On a P3 850/512MB the dic took maybe 4-5 minutes to assemble, then the usual time to burn. Blissfully unremarkable in that respect. :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:15:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67EF716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:15:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C33143D68 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j069FCj32885; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:15:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Timothy Luoma" , "Sergey Zaharchenko" Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:15:12 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <03704070-5FC2-11D9-913B-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: RE: modem not responding to mgetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:15:19 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Timothy Luoma > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 1:05 AM > To: Sergey Zaharchenko > Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions > Subject: Re: modem not responding to mgetty > > Oh well, I'll have to see if the local WalMart (our closest thing we > have to an electronics store) has an external, non-USB modem. This > outta be good. > Check Goodwill, they usually have a number of them in their misc electronics pile. it's somewhat disenheartening when I see USR Courier 56K v.Everything modems that I paid $200 for new, years ago, marked at $14.99. Ebay is also full of them. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:17:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F5516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5A643D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:17:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so555260rnz for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:17:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index:message-id; b=SFXAWPUKvADeRoUzMAkPzIL7gUIemOTYe6MSVtFu++i519b8d4fDugRmJ9ugkiPMqLt4DmYeRlt9VII09RLqiqYFnrZ8VPaJZFK+T1Ct1zUXoIBysNwxWnnbE45NCaiMLWXmxiuI1aoJYBvFVBvrIcLmb7Kgzw+AkBTVK5077G0= Received: by 10.38.8.61 with SMTP id 61mr576733rnh; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:17:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix ([220.225.80.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 62sm1106rna.2005.01.06.01.17.55; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:17:56 -0800 (PST) From: "Subhro" To: "'Mark'" , Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:47:49 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C4F3FE.B0E559C0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050106005518.A68024@logik.ath.cx> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcTzzZlbmoeUniCNQSa9HLPh7kaxFwAAqeVg Message-ID: <41dd0244.7b9f9311.5387.000d@smtp.gmail.com> Subject: RE: make installworld - permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:17:58 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C4F3FE.B0E559C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Mark > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 14:25 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: make installworld - permission denied > > > > Do you have /tmp setup so that it is "no exec"? > > > cat /etc/fstab > > I think you may have both stumbled onto the cause of the > problem. :) > > /dev/ad3s1e /tmp ufs rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,nosymfollow > > I didn't realise that non-exec /tmp was a no-no. Nopes that's not right. For enhancing security even I mount /var/tmp with noexec and softlink /tmp to /var/tmp. Doing that prevents people from hiding binaries in the world writable /tmp, /var/tmp whatever. Just remember to remount it without "noexec" before installworld. Regards S. Indian Institute of Information Technology Subhro Sankha Kar Block AQ-13/1, Sector V Salt Lake City PIN 700091 India ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C4F3FE.B0E559C0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJ4TCCAj0w ggGmAhEAzbp/VvDf5LxU/iKss3KqVTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFADBfMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUG A1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVibGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2Vy dGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwHhcNOTYwMTI5MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgwODAxMjM1OTU5WjBfMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVi bGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0A MIGJAoGBAOUZv22jVmEtmUhx9mfeuY3rt56GgAqRDvo4Ja9GiILlc6igmyRdDR/MZW4MsNBWhBiH mgabEKFz37RYOWtuwfYV1aioP6oSBo0xrH+wNNePNGeICc0UEeJORVZpH3gCgNrcR5EpuzbJY1zF 4Ncth3uhtzKwezC6Ki8xqu6jZ9rbAgMBAAEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQADgYEATD+4i8Zo3+5DMw5d 6abLB4RNejP/khv0Nq3YlSI2aBFsfELM85wuxAc/FLAPT/+Qknb54rxK6Y/NoIAK98Up8YIiXbix 3YEjo3slFUYweRb46gVLlH8dwhzI47f0EEA8E8NfH1PoSOSGtHuhNbB7Jbq4046rPzidADQAmPPR cZQwggNmMIICz6ADAgECAhANi0/uqtIYW/R1ap0p4X/7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAMF8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjE3MDUGA1UECxMuQ2xhc3MgMSBQdWJsaWMg UHJpbWFyeSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw05ODA1MTIwMDAwMDBaFw0wODA1MTIy MzU5NTlaMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1 c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNv cnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJ bmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC7WkSKBBa7Vf0DeootlE8VeDa4DUqyb5xUv7zodyqdufBou5XZMUFweoFL uUgTVi3HCOGEQqvAopKrRFyqQvCCDgLpL/vCO7u+yScKXbawNkIztW5UiE+HSr8Z2vkV6A+Hthzj zMaajn9qJJLj/OBluqexfu/J2zdqyErICQbkmQIDAQABo4G0MIGxMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIB BjA1BgNVHR8ELjAsMCqgKKAmhiRodHRwOi8vY3JsLnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9wY2ExLjEuMS5jcmww RwYDVR0gBEAwPjA8BgtghkgBhvhFAQcBATAtMCsGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29t L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBMA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8CAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AgUAA4GBAEJ8Dt+MeUysvwjsTVUvUImgxV5OLl6VMpt5rWURCxxKUsTVqDEhjt4Qm2wIxQfmA7nn yDR4CQnyvAZC+FqMg9GK3qoi9dnjIdLPZYwGM7DNILIzzQq9PuGdwTWpZLCnpSRb6fFo6xPEfDf0 lGQNmsW9MxfvgzOgPuWqPq7Ycx+tMIIEMjCCA5ugAwIBAgIQOo5O0s00DtVmctud5DTy6zANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQUFADCBzDEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNVBAsTFlZlcmlTaWdu IFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVwb3NpdG9yeS9SUEEg SW5jb3JwLiBCeSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxSDBGBgNVBAMTP1ZlcmlTaWduIENsYXNzIDEg Q0EgSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBTdWJzY3JpYmVyLVBlcnNvbmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDAeFw0wNDExMTEw MDAwMDBaFw0wNTA3MTgyMzU5NTlaMIIBEjEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNV BAsTFlZlcmlTaWduIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVw b3NpdG9yeS9SUEEgSW5jb3JwLiBieSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxHjAcBgNVBAsTFVBlcnNv bmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDE0MDIGA1UECxMrRGlnaXRhbCBJRCBDbGFzcyAxIC0gTWljcm9zb2Z0 IEZ1bGwgU2VydmljZTETMBEGA1UEAxQKU3ViaHJvIEthcjEjMCEGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYUc3ViaHJv LmthckBnbWFpbC5jb20wgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAKzp0P4Gh5arpymZu4cW FUb1gQ+qcJtb5B788xi2oskigeKdCgj9tiw5VdAW2rXoOO435Ch2mjBylJb49TFDfy636Fw0F5ij VuyIwtVQQANoiMICBZ8MIZyrBSK9/PyoHeITsnIoCucE4qYGkLL3CYzijoU/iZGwAS0iif7H2jJL AgMBAAGjgcswgcgwCQYDVR0TBAIwADBEBgNVHSAEPTA7MDkGC2CGSAGG+EUBBxcDMCowKAYIKwYB BQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgWgMB0GA1UdJQQW MBQGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDAjAUBgpghkgBhvhFAQYHBAYWBE5vbmUwMwYDVR0fBCwwKjAo oCagJIYiaHR0cDovL2NybC52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vY2xhc3MxLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOB gQBdijWu576noKjQbr0tQSROebsGab9JvR9rh3t9WagovURLjgi6zX/U6IxUSEXi4ECXtSZtEFpL 6yNUq+/mxEXvG7RX0Pe0T5iULmJxxrzO3Qvnc0UJJHKaYd5F4JD3c6YanGjwx3vDEfDQT8pzxHtb PXp6n18sFnbfiFG0ytSKPjGCBD4wggQ6AgEBMIHhMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5j LjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWdu LmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UE AxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3Qg VmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggKyMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzEL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA1MDEwNjA5MTc0OFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYE FK+Ka8n8iG+9s31ni4cFei5ex5PxMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZI hvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIa MAoGCCqGSIb3DQIFMIHyBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgeQwgeEwgcwxFzAVBgNVBAoTDlZlcmlTaWduLCBJ bmMuMR8wHQYDVQQLExZWZXJpU2lnbiBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz13d3cudmVyaXNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBIEluY29ycC4gQnkgUmVmLixMSUFCLkxURChjKTk4MUgwRgYD VQQDEz9WZXJpU2lnbiBDbGFzcyAxIENBIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3Vic2NyaWJlci1QZXJzb25hIE5v dCBWYWxpZGF0ZWQCEDqOTtLNNA7VZnLbneQ08uswgfQGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYHkoIHhMIHMMRcw FQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4s TElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1 YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIGALxtzcVxJIK/sXAarb+KIcZ1ipWHaSv6WjG49U4TlwS67U/Rr0zehIWEFtWDEdSUv +pIRt7rtiuRI+iuzOq81D7BIAw3nnrQprQYW5rEdGgmRix5lQk6nn49sr220qtHDrIIPTKMyW4Xe T/3Z9jKtkl3FoidC68BB+VbWgvAA2BQAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C4F3FE.B0E559C0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:21:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BF216A4CF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:21:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from istanbul.enderunix.org (freefall.marmara.edu.tr [193.140.143.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D8CC43D55 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:21:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ofsen@enderunix.org) Received: (qmail 64247 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jan 2005 09:21:30 -0000 X-Mail-Scanner: Scanned by qSheff 0.8-p3 against viruses and spams (http://www.enderunix.org/qsheff/) Message-ID: <20050106092130.64244.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> From: Omer Faruk Sen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:21:29 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: hardware@freebsd.org Subject: disk error or what ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:21:32 -0000 Hi, I have a scsi controller: iir0: mem 0xfc2f0000-0xfc2f3fff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci4 Yestarday I have taken this messages from my dmesg output: iir0: SCSI-B, ID 0: last status 0x00000107. I/O status: SELECTION_TIMEOUT iir0: SCSI-B, ID 0: Check cables, termination, termpower, LVDS operation, etc. iir0: Array Drive 0: Logical Drive 0 failed iir0: Array Drive 0: FAIL state entered iir0: SCSI-B, ID 0: Auto Hot Plug started for slot 0 iir0: SCSI-B, ID 0: MPI returned 0x00000043 iir0: Bus B: The SCSI controller successfully recovered from a SCSI BUS issue. The issue may still be present on the BUS. Check cables, termination, termpower, LVDS operation, etc iir0: SCSI-B, ID 0: MPI returned 0x00000048 I want to be sure that if I have understood right. It seems that Driver0 has failed. But I want to be sure that that is correct. How can I verift that Driver0 has the problem. ----------------------- Omer Faruk Sen http://www.EnderUNIX.ORG Software Development Team @ Turkey http://www.Faruk.NET For Public key: http://www.enderunix.org/ofsen/ofsen.asc ******************************************************** First Turkish FreeBSD book is out! Go check it. Duydunuz mu! Turkiye'nin ilk FreeBSD kitabi cikti. http://www.acikkod.com/freebsd.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:22:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE72D16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:22:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (fia148-72.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.72.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85D143D58 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl) Received: from localhost (colin@localhost) by kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j069MJ825912; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:22:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:22:19 +0100 From: "Colin J. Raven" To: Tm4528@aol.com In-Reply-To: <190.36a3bb8d.2f0dde36@aol.com> Message-ID: References: <190.36a3bb8d.2f0dde36@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:22:23 -0000 On Jan 5 at 19:20, Tm4528@aol.com launched this into the bitstream: > In a message dated 1/5/05 7:16:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, > kris@obsecurity.org writes: >> Why are you here? >> >> I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you >> were born with an advantage in that are > > He has a Holy Mission. > Yes, a mission to get the FreeBSD team to support 4.10 until they can get > 5.x working properly. Whats not reasonable about that? Excuse me, though I may be a mere acolyte I have to severely disagree with you. If this was a bar, consider yourself smashed over the head with a barstool, stomped into a bloodied mess then unceremoniously dragged into the parking lot and thrown in a dumpster. That is without doubt the single most idiotic, counter-productive, untrue, fallacious, and outright *false* statement I've ever read on any BSD list - ever. 4.10 *is* supported, and 5.3 works "as advertised" - what the hell is your *problem* exactly??? Apologies to the list, but this was just too much. I shall now cease and desist, instead just fulminate quietly and post on this matter no longer. Regards to all, -Colin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:34:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DDF16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:34:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE50043D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:34:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CmU1q-0003Bq-IR; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:34:02 +0100 Message-ID: <41DD060A.6060501@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:34:02 +0100 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041124 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <41DC0714.2000408@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20050105190455.GA1566@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050105190455.GA1566@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:26:12PM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > >>Hi list, >> >>i use 5.3-RELEASE-p2. >>When i try to load module iir for my ICP raidcan't load iir: No such file or directory >>root@antsrv1 [~] # >> >>dmesg shows that 'cam_simq_alloc' is undefined. However, module cam.ko, >>which exports cam_simq_alloc is loaded: >> >>root@antsrv1 [~] #>> 2 14 0xc077b000 537f0 acpi.ko >> 3 1 0xc37f1000 31000 cam.ko >>root@antsrv1 [~] # >>root@antsrv1 [/boot/kernel] # nm cam.ko|grep cam_simq_alloc >>0000e70c T cam_simq_alloc >>root@antsrv1 [/boot/kernel] # >> >>What am i missing here? >> >>I need to load the every change to the raid controller's configuration (which >>i am playing raid controller for disks? > > > camcontrol rescan? ;) > > Kris [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cam_simq_alloc undefined X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:34:04 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:26:12PM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > >>Hi list, >> >>i use 5.3-RELEASE-p2. >>When i try to load module iir for my ICP raid controller, i get: >> >>root@antsrv1 [~] # kldload iir >>kldload: can't load iir: No such file or directory >>root@antsrv1 [~] # >> >>dmesg shows that 'cam_simq_alloc' is undefined. However, module cam.ko, >>which exports cam_simq_alloc is loaded: >> >>root@antsrv1 [~] # kldstat >>Id Refs Address Size Name >> 1 4 0xc0400000 37a5b0 kernel >> 2 14 0xc077b000 537f0 acpi.ko >> 3 1 0xc37f1000 31000 cam.ko >>root@antsrv1 [~] # >>root@antsrv1 [/boot/kernel] # nm cam.ko|grep cam_simq_alloc >>0000e70c T cam_simq_alloc >>root@antsrv1 [/boot/kernel] # >> >>What am i missing here? >> >>I need to load the scsi stuff as modules, because otherwise i have to >>reboot after every change to the raid controller's configuration (which >>i am playing with ATM). Or is there another way to have the kernel >>rescan the raid controller for disks? > > > camcontrol rescan? ;) > > Kris Hi Kris, i tried 'camcontrol rescan all' but it did not work. New drives were not recognized. Seems like reboot is the way to go.. Heinrich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:36:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451E616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:36:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pastinakel.tue.nl (pastinakel.tue.nl [131.155.2.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFA243D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: by pastinakel.tue.nl (Postfix, from userid 40) id E01B014BF51; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:36:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by pastinakel.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FE314BFA7; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:36:25 +0100 (CET) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j069aPdn098460; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:36:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stijn) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:36:25 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050106093625.GF97574@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Stijn Hoop , Kris Kennaway , Dave Horsfall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200501060115.j061FAgJ015200@mp.cs.niu.edu> <20050106045737.GA58777@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050106045737.GA58777@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on pastinakel.tue.nl X-Spam-DCC: dmv.com: pastinakel.tue.nl 1181; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Level: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Dave Horsfall Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:36:30 -0000 --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:57:37PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 03:48:05PM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > > Procmail is your friend. Something like: > >=20 > > # > > # Well-known AOL troll on FreeBSD. > > # > > :0: > > * ^From: .*Tm4528@aol.com >=20 > You need to instead block Tm[0-9]+ because he likes to change his > address every few weeks [1]. >=20 > Kris >=20 > [1] Perhaps the counter reflects the number of times his AOL account > has been deleted. Ah, that's why I started seeing him again. Thanks for the pointer. --Stijn --=20 "Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw." -- Lilo, "Disney's Lilo & Stitch" --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3QaZY3r/tLQmfWcRAojuAKCQijLURfFywyIZLDfP1X1wt8httwCeM/nk zhoq5qfcLuU/rzrv7WZblwA= =Jo2c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:38:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D577016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:38:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690B443D55 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:38:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from bsdbox.farid-hajji.net (bsdbox [192.168.254.3]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30904B875 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:39:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:39:10 +0100 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106093910.GA489@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> References: <41DC44BB.8020608@vilot.com> <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:38:37 -0000 On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 02:53:18AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Tom Vilot writes: > > TV> I prefer to use just about any other tool (except, of course, for > TV> JSP/.NET, etc). Python, Perl, ... any other tool will do the jobs I > TV> need done and I can avoid the sluggishness of Java, the licensing > TV> ambiguities, and the dependence on a company that is *not* a > TV> software company to begin with! > > I tend to agree. Are people still using Java? Perl seems to do just > about everything. Most companies I'm working for (freelancing) are currently migrating their java legacy stuff to Python, Zope, Plone etc... (sometimes transitioning through Jython). So you may have a point here ;) > Anthony Cheers, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 09:50:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7BD16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:50:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0DE43D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:50:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id j069oA925602 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:50:10 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:50:10 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <190.36a3bb8d.2f0dde36@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:50:14 -0000 On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Colin J. Raven wrote: > 4.10 *is* supported, and 5.3 works "as advertised" - what the hell is your > *problem* exactly??? _____________________ /| /| | | | ||__|| | | Please do not | / O O\__ | feed the | / \ | Trolls | / \ \|_____________________| / _ \ \ || / |\____\ \ || / | | | |\____/ || / \|_|_|/ | _|| / / \ |____| || / | | | --| | | | |____ --| * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/ *-- _--\ _ \ | || / _ \\ | / ` * / \_ /- | | | * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________ -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:05:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8596316A4D1 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:05:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dave.horsfall.org (mrdavi2.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9EE43D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:05:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by dave.horsfall.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id j06A54425630 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:05:05 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:05:04 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <03704070-5FC2-11D9-913B-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Message-ID: References: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <0AAB74E3-5F2E-11D9-BE17-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <03704070-5FC2-11D9-913B-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: modem not responding to mgetty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:05:26 -0000 On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Timothy Luoma wrote: > Oh well, I'll have to see if the local WalMart (our closest thing we have to > an electronics store) has an external, non-USB modem. This outta be good. You're saying that USB modems are not good? Are they winmodems too? I'm looking for a fax-modem for a lap-top, and I don't fancy the idea of an external modem (via a USB-serial cable) because of the need for a power supply as well. I do have a Cardbus slot, though... -- Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:11:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE07B16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:11:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from male.aldigital.co.uk (male.thebunker.net [213.129.64.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B4843D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:11:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by male.aldigital.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4EB9774D; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:11:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])j06ABtsW047663; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:11:55 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <41DD0EE5.2040003@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:11:49 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: daniel quinn References: <200501051425.28386.freebsd@danielquinn.org> In-Reply-To: <200501051425.28386.freebsd@danielquinn.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig62A44596790DB789967E6F05" cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: live/install cd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:11:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig62A44596790DB789967E6F05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit daniel quinn wrote: > i've been asked by my company to put together a basic cd that can install a > basic freebsd5 system just by putting in the disc and turning it on. it'd > have to have a base number of packages and be configured for networking etc > at bootup etc. This can be done by modifying one of the standard install disks, so that you provide a config file for sysinstall(8) plus some local packages to modify files in /etc -- ie. create user accounts, add settings to rc.conf and so forth. See sysinstall(8) for instructions on how to setup the config file, particularly the section on LOAD_CONFIG_FILE. Also look at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pxe/index.html Which, apart from the detail of booting over a network, rather from a CD basically explains how to do most of what you want. You can even build your own custom release CDs with any local modifications you require. Documentation of how 'make release' works is in: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/index.html And for a method of doing the job that might be slightly more familiar to you as a Gentoo user, this article may prove enlightening: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/fbsd-from-scratch/index.html Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 8 Dane Court Manor School Rd PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Tilmanstone Tel: +44 1304 617253 Kent, CT14 0JL UK --------------enig62A44596790DB789967E6F05 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQd0O6pr7OpndfbmCAQKCWgQAhtyuP6PT67VwYoJ8IEHJVHbKBqVay76G a8i9sRJQu/rhNFKyKcU0OLeLlPTaIMEm+NAx/2s8g6B+ibO9cE5LYHIE30GluhOM ExPf/hZ8W6ZH9LcF3L83bRLM/lDJSZDIiAMlP2F5NQzzTQ7gaVfNWRpjOoBSAX8S w1ccwWxCRps= =JgKO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig62A44596790DB789967E6F05-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:14:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CB416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:14:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.mccme.ru (ns.mccme.ru [62.117.108.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A922F43D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:14:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:emin@mccme.ru [62.117.108.7]) by ns.mccme.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id j06AOfOY054555; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:24:41 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:14:53 +0300 From: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106101453.GA26081@mccme.ru> References: <20050106085437.GA20461@mccme.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: MCCME Moscow cc: Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: can't remove directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:14:38 -0000 On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:03:31AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: " What is the error message when you: " " cd /var/tmp " " rm -r temproot " " as the root user? " " Ted Sorry Ted. System write "Operation not permitted": rm: /var/old-tmp/temproot/var/empty: Operation not permitted rm: /var/old-tmp/temproot/var: Directory not empty rm: /var/old-tmp/temproot: Directory not empty rm: /var/old-tmp: Directory not empty " > -----Original Message----- " > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org " > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Eugene " > M. Minkovskii " > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:55 AM " > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org " > Subject: can't remove directory " > " > " > Hi! " > " > some months ago I'm install FreeBSD 5.2.1 on my PC. When I do it " > I set default partition size. For example /var has 256 Mb. After " > some time I found that It is too small for me. I move a lot of " > directory to /usr and make symlinks to it: " > " > mkdir /usr/var " > mv /var/tmp /var/mail /var/log /usr/var " > cd /var " > ln -s /usr/var/tmp " > ln -s /usr/var/mail " > ln -s /usr/var/log " > " > All of this working nice, except one: I cant remove /var/tmp. " > Only rename working. In this directory placed one "dyeless" " > directory /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty. " > " > How can I remove this directory? I try to fsck -y in single user " > momde, I trying rm -rf /var/tmp/temproot/var/empty in single user " > mode with only /var mounted. But All of this useful. " > " > " > -- " > Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii " > óÅÎÓÏÒÎÏ ×ÁÛ, å×ÇÅÎÉÊ íÉÎØËÏ×ÓËÉÊ " > _______________________________________________ " > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list " > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions " > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" " > " " _______________________________________________ " freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list " http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions " To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii СенÑорно ваш, Евгений МиньковÑкий From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:19:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10D116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:19:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D923A43D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:19:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 24463 invoked by uid 1008); 6 Jan 2005 10:19:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 10:19:57 -0000 Received: from 68.165.89.73 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net); by mail.el.net with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:19:57 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <63115.68.165.89.73.1105006797.squirrel@68.165.89.73> In-Reply-To: <20050104112246.GA14661@ipt.ru> References: <53879.68.165.89.73.1104554054.squirrel@68.165.89.73> <59114.68.165.89.73.1104823413.squirrel@68.165.89.73> <20050104112246.GA14661@ipt.ru> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:19:57 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Boris B. Samorodov" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BTX halted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:19:02 -0000 ok.. i tried installing 5.2.1 from iso. the same pain... the machine has energy BIOS v6.00PG board version tag is: K7SEM Ver:1.1b 09/28/2001 virus protection is disabled UltraDMA is disabled for the primary master and slave and the secondary ones too... on some posts online disabling DMA in the BIOS is being offered as a solution but i have only UltraDMA options... IDE HDD Block mode is enabled.. the primary drive has windows (i think w2k) installed on it which i want to wipe out. the windows doesn't boot either - basically the blue screen of death. at this point the situation is getting rather unpleasant... my next step is to try to figure out how to update the bios on this board and see if that will happened at all... any leads or help will be appreciated. thanks a lot... > Hi! > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:23:33AM -0500, kalin mintchev wrote: >> this is a few days old. i got a reply saying to try floppies but from >> the >> INSTALL.txt under the amd64/5.3-REL it says: >> 1.3 Floppy Disk Image Instructions >> >> Floppy disk based install is not supported on FreeBSD/amd64. >> >> like i said i played with bios settings and nothing really worked. >> can somebody help? >> >> thanks.. >> >> >> > hi all... >> > >> > i'm trying to install 5.3 on an amd machine... >> > i got the discs and they are ok but when i start the off the disk the >> boot >> > stops with BTX halted no matter which boot mode i chose. >> > i looked on google and i found a few posts about bios issues but non >> of >> > that helped - i couldn't find how to disable DMA. the only location i >> saw >> > the DMA mentioned was under PnP/PCI configurations => Resources >> Controlled >> > by in the bios but there the setting is Auto(ESCD). i tried al the >> options >> > there and it still stops at the same place... >> > >> > anybody can help?! >> > >> > thanks.... > > In similar circumstances (but with FreeBSD/i386) I succeeded by > installing one of the previous releases and upgrading by sources. > > WBR > -- > bsam > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:21:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DAA16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:21:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A18643D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:21:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-208-232.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.208.232]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j06ALXp0014145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:21:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41DD1107.7000002@mac.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:20:55 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" References: <20050106085437.GA20461@mccme.ru> <20050106101453.GA26081@mccme.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050106101453.GA26081@mccme.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.5 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on pi.codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't remove directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:21:41 -0000 Eugene M. Minkovskii wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:03:31AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > " What is the error message when you: [ ...steps removed... ] > Sorry Ted. System write "Operation not permitted": > > rm: /var/old-tmp/temproot/var/empty: Operation not permitted > rm: /var/old-tmp/temproot/var: Directory not empty > rm: /var/old-tmp/temproot: Directory not empty > rm: /var/old-tmp: Directory not empty Ah, what's happened is that the system immutable flag has been set on that directory. You'll need to do: chflags -R noschg /var/old-tmp rm -rf /var/old-tmp -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:25:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBDB16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:25:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29D443D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:25:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@rcn.com) Received: from 207-237-110-41.c3-0.crm-ubr4.crm.ny.cable.rcn.com ([207.237.110.41] helo=[192.168.0.2]) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1CmUpL-0000FY-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:25:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:25:12 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: Gerard@FreeBSD.ORG, Seibert@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <20050106052050.9236.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.12.01 [en] Subject: Configuring POSTFIX to use mutiple email accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard-seibert@rcn.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:25:12 -0000 I am trying to solicit some information on how to configure 'postfix' to accommodate multiple IP addresses. I have several email accounts. I use them for newsgroups, forums, etc. Most of the accounts use different 'SMTP' and 'POP' settings. However, in two cases, they use the same 'SMTP' and 'POP' addresses. I have not been able to find any definitive information on how to configure 'postfix' to handle this. I would appreciate it if someone could either direct me to a source of information that might prove useful, or provide me with some first hand knowledge of how this is accomplished. Thanks! Gerard Seibert gerard-seibert@rcn.com It is much easier to suggest solutions when you do not know too much about the problem. Malcolm Forbes (1919-1990) , , /( )` \ \___ / | /- _ `-/ ' (/\/ \ \ /\ / / | ` \ O O ) / | `-^--'`< ' (_.) _ ) / `.___/` / `-----' / <----. __ / __ \ <----|====O)))==) \) /==== <----' `--' `.__,' \ | | \ / ______( (_ / \______ (FL) ,' ,-----' | \ `--{__________) \/ "Berkeley Unix Daemon" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:34:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F6E16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:34:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F83243D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:34:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon.burke@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so23462wri for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 02:34:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=PxycGe8/WdxceT4ooFUaMRuixczuecEGRoab4bDwKXyqfzDAJaap+Oy3Eir+sO53kSakNI03zS/3kFReY0G1TZ80h/CLA16yPTuYmYgzumvxhPr4148Ap/OF054nTwH2AH5t0zrcIRrgkWg8oGHoG/Ffrn5xdu5AvJmHrvmfbmM= Received: by 10.54.39.19 with SMTP id m19mr186682wrm; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 02:34:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.57 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:34:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d7d2dd20501060234565349ee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:34:48 +0000 From: Simon Burke To: Vadim Maksimenko , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <01cd01c4f3da$84a432b0$016400bf@ois.lt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1104954090.35341.2.camel@babyblue> <2d7d2dd2050105125235030a25@mail.gmail.com> <01cd01c4f3da$84a432b0$016400bf@ois.lt> Subject: Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Simon Burke List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:34:49 -0000 On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:28:52 +0200, Vadim Maksimenko wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Simon Burke" > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:52 PM > Subject: Re: Dumb OpenOffice install error > > > I have OpenOffice 1.1.3 running on 5.3. All that i neded to get it to > > build from ports was to install jdk14 before, as it tires to use the > > linux java which doesnt work. Unless things have changed in the past > > month or so?? > > Dumb question: WHY OpenOffice requires java? Is java much more effective > and robust than a copiled C/C++ code? As far as I know, java-coded > applications are: slow, resource-hungry, have bad multitasking effect. Is > that a new stupid fashion or what? I was forced to phase out Oracle branch > in my project, when I have discovered it needs java... > I'm not entirely sure to be honest. I think it has to do with its relationship with staroffice, as openoffice started with sun releasing code for a previous release of staroffice. So i think that is why its still in java, it would be too much work to re-implement i guess. Also (quote)As far as I know, java-coded applications are: slow, resource-hungry, have bad multitasking effect. (/quote) IMHO, Isnt that pretty much openoffice anyway? -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:42:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405E616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:42:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D706C43D2D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:42:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-208-232.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.208.232]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j06Ag9hY026929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:42:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41DD15DB.2070103@mac.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:41:31 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kalin mintchev References: <53879.68.165.89.73.1104554054.squirrel@68.165.89.73> <59114.68.165.89.73.1104823413.squirrel@68.165.89.73> <20050104112246.GA14661@ipt.ru> <63115.68.165.89.73.1105006797.squirrel@68.165.89.73> In-Reply-To: <63115.68.165.89.73.1105006797.squirrel@68.165.89.73> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.5 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on pi.codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BTX halted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:42:22 -0000 kalin mintchev wrote: > ok.. i tried installing 5.2.1 from iso. the same pain... > the machine has energy BIOS v6.00PG > board version tag is: > K7SEM Ver:1.1b 09/28/2001 [ ... ] Later on in this message you mentioned you were looking at amd64/5.3-REL, but from the name & date of the BIOS I think you have an AMD32 motherboard, not AMD64: http://www.ecsusa.com/products/k7sem.html If this is so, then you would certainly do better to install the 32-bit generic x86 version of FreeBSD 5.3. However, you also mentioned that Windows was blue-screening, which suggests that there may be other problems with the system as well, possibly a bad power supply or the like. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 10:53:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6AF16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:53:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC5943D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:53:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-208-232.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.208.232]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j06Ar3Th033197 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:53:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41DD1869.6030502@mac.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 05:52:25 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gerard-seibert@rcn.com References: <20050106052050.9236.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> In-Reply-To: <20050106052050.9236.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.5 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on pi.codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Configuring POSTFIX to use mutiple email accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:53:09 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: > I am trying to solicit some information on how to configure 'postfix' > to accommodate multiple IP addresses. Postfix normally performs MX lookups via DNS to figure out where to send mail, although you can override that for specific cases via a transport table. > I have several email accounts. I use them for newsgroups, forums, etc. > Most of the accounts use different 'SMTP' and 'POP' settings. However, > in two cases, they use the same 'SMTP' and 'POP' addresses. I have not > been able to find any definitive information on how to configure > 'postfix' to handle this. Postfix is an MTA, it doesn't have anything to do with POP. That's up to a mail client (MUA) like Mozilla or pine. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 11:08:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5458316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:08:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp815.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp815.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B76A643D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:08:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (jtinnin@pacbell.net@67.116.52.197 with login) by smtp815.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 11:08:44 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 03:08:44 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <190.36a3bb8d.2f0dde36@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <190.36a3bb8d.2f0dde36@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501060308.44745.krinklyfig@spymac.com> cc: Tm4528@aol.com cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:08:45 -0000 On Wednesday 05 January 2005 04:20 pm, Tm4528@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 1/5/05 7:16:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, > > kris@obsecurity.org writes: > > Why are you here? > > > > I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you > > were born with an advantage in that are > > He has a Holy Mission. > > Yes, a mission to get the FreeBSD team to support 4.10 until they can get > 5.x working properly. Whats not reasonable about that? You are not doing anything to further this mission by complaining on a tech help list, which is the only action I have seen you take besides running one speed test. Your technique does distract from the purpose of this list, and it starts flame wars. Certainly, someone who is truly concerned would find more constructive methods. - jt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 11:23:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7972E16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:23:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.mccme.ru (ns.mccme.ru [62.117.108.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0323D43D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:23:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:emin@mccme.ru [62.117.108.7]) by ns.mccme.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id j06BXcOY057462; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:33:38 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:23:50 +0300 From: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106112350.GA31407@mccme.ru> References: <20050106085437.GA20461@mccme.ru> <20050106101453.GA26081@mccme.ru> <41DD1107.7000002@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <41DD1107.7000002@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: MCCME Moscow Subject: Re: can't remove directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:23:35 -0000 On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:20:55AM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: " Eugene M. Minkovskii wrote: " >On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:03:31AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: " >" What is the error message when you: " [ ...steps removed... ] " >Sorry Ted. System write "Operation not permitted": " > " >rm: /var/old-tmp/temproot/var/empty: Operation not permitted " >rm: /var/old-tmp/temproot/var: Directory not empty " >rm: /var/old-tmp/temproot: Directory not empty " >rm: /var/old-tmp: Directory not empty " " Ah, what's happened is that the system immutable flag has been set on that " directory. You'll need to do: " " chflags -R noschg /var/old-tmp " rm -rf /var/old-tmp " Thank you, Chuck. It's work. -- Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii óÅÎÓÏÒÎÏ ×ÁÛ, å×ÇÅÎÉÊ íÉÎØËÏ×ÓËÉÊ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 11:37:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197E416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:37:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2FF43D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:37:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2/d) with ESMTP id j06Bb3fP025824; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:37:03 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:37:02 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200501061137.j06Bb2XT025823@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: dave@horsfall.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:37:16 -0000 Many thanks go to Dave Horsfall , who wrote the winning tip on Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:14:24 +1100 (EST): >On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Scott Bennett wrote: > >> As root, I did the following (assuming I remember the Windows path >> correctly:-): >> >> mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt > >[...] > >Try copying the file to a local BSD file-system; the NTFS semantics could >be getting in the way. Also try write-once media, if you can, as I've >occasionally had difficulties with rewriteable media. > This appears to have been the ticket. I tried it first with the bootonly image, which made a bootable CD-RW. After testing its bootability, I then tried it with the disc1 image, which also worked and did boot okay. So I now have the disks I need as CD-RWs. However, I would prefer to have them as CD-Rs, but ran into a little problem. The bootonly image went onto a CD-R just fine, and the CD-R did boot right. However, at the very end of burning the disc1 image to a CD-R, I got the following message. burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCFIXATE): Input/output error I tried it again in case it were a fluke, but got the same result. The CD-R appears to boot okay, but I don't know whether the entire content of the CD-R is intact. Would I run into problems with files physically near the end of the written part of the CD-R? The disc2 image did the same thing. If someone can explain why both images went onto CD-RWs just fine, but got the error during fixation on CD-Rs, I'd like to see it. Anyway, thanks to all who responded to my plea for help. I can now move forward another inch or two toward (I hope) a usable FreeBSD system. It just kills me to have this Inspiron XPS going mostly to waste so far, but maybe 5.3 will do what 5.2.1 couldn't. :-} Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 11:46:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503B616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:46:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.68.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F0043D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2/d) with ESMTP id j06BjiRC025944; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:45:44 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:45:44 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200501061145.j06BjiBZ025943@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: flowers@users.sourceforge.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:46:40 -0000 On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:10 -0700 Danny MacMillan wrote: >On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:35:43PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: >> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 Danny MacMillan >> wrote: >> >> >This is not intuitive, but you do not want to use the "make a >> >bootable CD" function of Sonic RecordNow! to make a bootable CD. >> >> On what basis is the above statement made if you haven't used >> Sonic RecordNow! ? It certainly looks to me as though the green >> button is the *only* way to burn an image (not counting making an >> exact copy of > >On the basis of your characterizing the little green button as being >"for making a bootable CD", and my understanding of that function in >alternative software. In short: I misunderstood. I apologize for >the misdirection. > Oh. That was because, if one places the cursor over the green button, a box appears temporarily bearing a line that says, "Click here to make this CD/DVD bootable". And, as noted in a different posting in this thread, that button brings up a browser panel for choosing an image file (but not displaying .iso files among the choices) to burn in making the bootable disk. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 11:54:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3582016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:54:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A174543D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:54:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 34764 invoked by uid 1008); 6 Jan 2005 11:55:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 11:55:05 -0000 Received: from 24.90.34.93 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net); by mail.el.net with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:55:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <57162.24.90.34.93.1105012505.squirrel@24.90.34.93> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:55:05 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Chuck Swiger" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: <53879.68.165.89.73.1104554054.squirrel@68.165.89.73> <59114.68.165.89.73.1104823413.squirrel@68.165.89.73> <20050104112246.GA14661@ipt.ru> <63115.68.165.89.73.1105006797.squirrel@68.165.89.73> <41DD15DB.2070103@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <41DD15DB.2070103@mac.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BTX halted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:54:07 -0000 thanks for the reply... > kalin mintchev wrote: >> ok.. i tried installing 5.2.1 from iso. the same pain... >> the machine has energy BIOS v6.00PG >> board version tag is: >> K7SEM Ver:1.1b 09/28/2001 > [ ... ] > > Later on in this message you mentioned you were looking at amd64/5.3-REL, > but > from the name & date of the BIOS I think you have an AMD32 motherboard, > not > AMD64: http://www.ecsusa.com/products/k7sem.html ok. this is probably it..... > > If this is so, then you would certainly do better to install the 32-bit generic x86 version of FreeBSD 5.3. ok. i thought you can not install x86 versions on systems with amd cpus. i'll try that... kinda new to amd - always used intel. > However, you also mentioned that > Windows > was blue-screening, which suggests that there may be other problems with the > system as well, possibly a bad power supply or the like. will double check power supply... > > -- > -Chuck thank you.... > > -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 11:57:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEE016A4CF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:57:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB9B43D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:57:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@rcn.com) Received: from 207-237-110-41.c3-0.crm-ubr4.crm.ny.cable.rcn.com ([207.237.110.41] helo=[192.168.0.2]) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1CmWGP-0005Gs-00; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:57:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:57:15 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: Chuck Swiger Sender: Gerard@FreeBSD.ORG, Seibert@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <41DD1869.6030502@mac.com> References: <20050106052050.9236.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> <41DD1869.6030502@mac.com> Message-Id: <20050106065102.7B36.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.12.01 [en] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Configuring POSTFIX to use mutiple email accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard-seibert@rcn.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:57:14 -0000 On Thursday, January 06, 2005 5:52:25 AM Chuck Swiger wrote: |>Gerard Seibert wrote: |>> I am trying to solicit some information on how to configure 'postfix' |>> to accommodate multiple IP addresses. |> |>Postfix normally performs MX lookups via DNS to figure out where to send mail, |>although you can override that for specific cases via a transport table. |> |>> I have several email accounts. I use them for newsgroups, forums, etc. |>> Most of the accounts use different 'SMTP' and 'POP' settings. However, |>> in two cases, they use the same 'SMTP' and 'POP' addresses. I have not |>> been able to find any definitive information on how to configure |>> 'postfix' to handle this. |> |>Postfix is an MTA, it doesn't have anything to do with POP. |>That's up to a mail client (MUA) like Mozilla or pine. |> |>-- |>-Chuck ********** Reply Separator ********** Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:51:02 AM OK, I got this information from this URL: http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=326 ============================================================= THE MTA: POSTFIX We've already done a few things to make sure Postfix runs for us internally, but not to make it work with the Internet. Here's where Postfix shines as being simple to setup: you need to change only one thing to make it work "out of the box." It's been my experience that whatever configuration you get when you install Postfix is ready to go, but it needs only to know the name of your ISP's mail server. You see, Postfix is a mail server on your machine, and it speaks the same language as almost every other mail server out there on the Internet. Unless your ISP does really weird things, it should quite willingly accept your outgoing mail just like it came from within their own internal mail system in their office. Login as root, and navigate to /usr/local/etc/postfix. Open the file named main.cf with your favorite editor. A good editor will allow the display of a line number for each line of text, either in the right margin or somewhere in the display. Go down to about line 310, where you should see this: #relayhost = $mydomain #relayhost = gateway.my.domain #relayhost = uucphost #relayhost = [an.ip.add.ress] These lines are examples that you can copy, but the hashmark (#) at the front of each one prevents Postfix from reading those lines as something it needs to use. The second one is your model for most dialup connections. Your ISP should be able to tell you the specific name of the computer that handles mail on their system. Most of them use "mail.something.com" or a similar name. Recall from the installation tutorial that this is the usual nomencalture for giving a computer an identifiable name for the Internet. At any rate, whatever your ISP tells you is what goes here. If they just give you an IP number, you can use that, too, by using the last line as your model. Just replace the letters with the digits. For now, all IP addresses are a series of numbers divided into four sections by periods or dots. It's probably a good idea for your own sake to simply add a new line below these four, but without the hash mark. Save the file. Then close it, and at the command line type: postfix reload ============================================================= Therefore, if I have several email addresses that are through different ISP's, don't I have to configure POSTFIX fir each of them? Thanks for your assistance. I am really new ( as if you could not guess ) at setting up a mail system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 12:04:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D774816A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:04:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from xxl.rdsbv.ro (xxl.rdsbv.ro [82.77.46.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5584543D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:04:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petre@kgb.ro) Received: from localhost (localhost.rdsbv.ro [127.0.0.1]) by xxl.rdsbv.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0F460E7 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:53:02 +0200 (EET) Received: from xxl.rdsbv.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xxl.rdsbv.ro [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19379-05 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:53:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from xxl.rdsbv.ro (localhost.rdsbv.ro [127.0.0.1]) by xxl.rdsbv.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7A560D6 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:52:59 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:52:59 +0200 From: Petre Bandac To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050104225259.1b917a6c@xxl.rdsbv.ro> Organization: kgb.ro X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at xxl.rdsbv.ro Subject: newsyslog & syslogd on 5.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:04:36 -0000 where from is newsyslog being called to rotate the logs ? (from what I read in the manpages, its only task is to rotate the logs); I can't find it in /etc/periodic thanks, petre -- Login: petre Name: Petre Bandac Directory: /home/petre Shell: /usr/local/bin/zsh On since Mon Jan 3 10:10 (EET) on ttyv0, idle 6:43 (messages off) Last login Mon Jan 3 21:43 (EET) on ttyp7 from lubyanka.kgb.ro New mail received Mon May 24 19:09 2004 (EEST) Unread since Tue Feb 17 12:31 2004 (EET) No Plan. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 12:07:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0CA16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:07:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mato.luukku.com (mato.luukku.com [193.209.83.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973D443D2D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:07:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from localhost (mta3-o.i.luukku.com [10.0.1.132]) by mta3-o.i.luukku.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588FB100A78; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:07:46 +0200 (EET) Received: from rekon (92a7.dsl.mtv3.fi [82.203.167.146]) by mato.luukku.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 27D8E22EE8C; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:07:46 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <015301c4f3e8$58464920$92a7cb52@rekon> From: "Reko Turja" To: References: <1761142680.20050104050725@wanadoo.fr> <040201c4f372$06d09210$92a7cb52@rekon> <1507832106.20050106024812@wanadoo.fr> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:07:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Subject: Re: Running top on system console without being logged on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:07:48 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 3:48 AM Subject: Re: Running top on system console without being logged on >> How about creating a user like this with vipw: >> topper::userno:groupno::0:0:Topper Harley:/nonexistent:/usr/bin/top >> and then just logging in on spare console screen as topper? >> >> I'm not sure if there are security implications though, even if the >> user >> is not member of the wheel group etc. > > I've considered this, but like you, I'm not sure of the security > implications, so I haven't actually done it. And is it possible to > include command-line options in the login shell command for a user? Actually not command line options as such, but you can make a login class for the top user in /etc/login.conf and feed the options via TOP environment variable from there. You cant shell out from top and renicing from non root account is impossible (except dropping the niceness of your own process). I think the approach is secure enough and if you give "topper" good enough password or deny logon from anywhere except from console, everything should be ok. Of course if the terminal is accessible to others than administrative staff, giving out the usernames can be a risk, but you can use the usernumbers option to avoid giving out the usernames. Did myself something very similar with a IPless firewall between a while back but I ran vmstat in the console instead. Good one glance monitoring without the need of logging on the machine itself. -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 12:35:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4221616A4E8 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:35:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thingy.apana.org.au (adsl-175.isp.net.au [202.1.119.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DD243D54 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:35:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from fun by thingy.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CmWqv-0000vY-00; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:34:57 +1100 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:34:57 +1100 To: Paul Krill , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106123456.GC2280@thingy.apana.org.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: David Gerard Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:35:27 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt (tedm@toybox.placo.com) [050106 06:29]: > It's of course quite legal for end users to download the JDK directly > from Sun and compile it on FreeBSD themselves and then use it. The main problem with this approach is that it requires a ridiculous amount of jumping through hoops - first you have to install the Linux compatibility interface and libraries (20 megabyte download and a reboot?), *then* the Linux version of Java (large download) because that's needed to run Sun conformance tests (you can only use Java to test Java), *then* the FreeBSD version. Assuming nothing breaks anywhere in the process. It's ridiculous hair-tearing stuff and led me to formulate: "Proprietary software isn't just evil, it's STUPID." (The Linux-compat bit wasn't such a strain for me personally, as my FreeBSD boxes are workstations and I run things like Firefox Linux nightly builds routinely. But for a server doing little other than Java, it's a large amount of cruft to no functional purpose.) - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 12:41:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F1716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:41:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thingy.apana.org.au (adsl-175.isp.net.au [202.1.119.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68D943D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from fun by thingy.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CmWxK-00014L-00 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:41:34 +1100 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:41:33 +1100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106124133.GD2280@thingy.apana.org.au> References: <41DC44BB.8020608@vilot.com> <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: David Gerard Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:41:35 -0000 Anthony Atkielski (atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) [050106 12:53]: > Tom Vilot writes: > TV> I prefer to use just about any other tool (except, of course, for > TV> JSP/.NET, etc). Python, Perl, ... any other tool will do the jobs I > TV> need done and I can avoid the sluggishness of Java, the licensing > TV> ambiguities, and the dependence on a company that is *not* a > TV> software company to begin with! > I tend to agree. Are people still using Java? Perl seems to do just > about everything. Commercially, yes - particularly for in-house apps, not anything distributed outside. My job is adminning Solaris and Red Hat boxes which are basically running an in-house platform with a pile of custom apps on top, both written in Java. Java's gratis-proprietary license is certainly good enough for our purposes businesswise, and it's cross-platform enough that we've had very little trouble sliding Solaris out from underneath and replacing it with Red Hat (HPaq servers offering a bit more bang for the buck). But you won't see much open-source Java until the license isn't odious. OpenOffice.org only uses it because of Sun. - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 12:46:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A844816A4CE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:46:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A994143D45; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:46:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from [134.93.183.16] (edda.Geo.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.183.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC9B3000BCA; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:46:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DD3326.4050908@uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:46:30 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Institut =?ISO-8859-15?Q?f=FCr_Geophysik?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-AT; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050102 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-mainz.de Subject: copying from DVD drive causes crash: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:46:29 -0000 Doing dd from the DVD drive (NEC ND 3500AG/2.18) fails in a corrupt image afterwards, copying with 'cp' from a inserted CD triggers the shown error and box dies immediately: Jan 6 12:17:20 edda kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension Jan 6 12:17:50 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 error=4 Jan 6 12:18:07 edda last message repeated 3 times Jan 6 12:29:44 edda kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension Jan 6 12:30:54 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 Jan 6 12:30:54 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) Jan 6 12:30:58 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 Jan 6 12:30:58 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) Jan 6 12:31:01 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 Jan 6 12:31:01 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) Jan 6 12:31:08 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 Jan 6 12:31:08 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) Jan 6 12:31:19 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 FreeBSD dies and freezes immediately. Box is a FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE box (cvsupdated and builtworld today). Hardware is a ASUS CUR-DLS based mainboard, SMP disabled, dmesg shown here: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #23: Thu Jan 6 09:45:18 UTC 2005 root@edda.geo.uni-mainz.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EDDA ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel Pentium III (1000.04-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x686 Stepping = 6 Features=0x387fbff real memory = 1073721344 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1041166336 (992 MB) ioapic0 irqs 0-15 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 16-31 on motherboard netsmb_dev: loaded npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0xe408-0xe40b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 7.0 (no driver attached) isab0: port 0xe800-0xe80f at device 15.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xd400-0xd40f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 ohci0: mem 0xfc000000-0xfc000fff irq 9 at device 15.2 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ugen0: OmniVision OV511+ Camera, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 pcib1: on acpi0 pci1: on pcib1 em0: port 0xd000-0xd03f mem 0xfb800000-0xfb81ffff irq 2 1 at device 2.0 on pci1 em0: Ethernet address: 00:07:e9:14:8f:7b em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A sym0: <1010-33> port 0xb800-0xb8ff mem 0xfa800000-0xfa801fff,0xfb000000-0xfb0003ff irq 24 at device 5.0 on pci1 sym0: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-80, LVD, parity checking sym0: open drain IRQ line driver, using on-chip SRAM sym0: using LOAD/STORE-based firmware. sym0: handling phase mismatch from SCRIPTS. sym0: [GIANT-LOCKED] sym1: <1010-33> port 0xb400-0xb4ff mem 0xf9800000-0xf9801fff,0xfa000000-0xfa0003ff irq 25 at device 5.1 on pci1 sym1: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-80, LVD, parity checking sym1: open drain IRQ line driver, using on-chip SRAM sym1: using LOAD/STORE-based firmware. sym1: handling phase mismatch from SCRIPTS. sym1: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x778-0x77a,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 orm0: at iomem 0xc8000-0xcbfff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <8 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 fb0 at vga0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1000040141 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.250 msec Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. acd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA33 Waiting 3 seconds for SCSI devices to settleacd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA33 Waiting 3 seconds for SCSI devices to settle (noperiph:sym0:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered. (noperiph:sym1:0:-1:-1): SCSI BUS reset delivered. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider acd0 is iso9660/CDROM. da0 at sym0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 62, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 17501MB (35843670 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2231C) da1 at sym0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da1: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 62, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 17501MB (35843670 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2231C) da2 at sym0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da2: 160.000MB/s transfers (80.000MHz, offset 62, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da2: 17429MB (35694904 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2221C) cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: <_NEC DVD_RW ND-3500AG 2.18> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: cd present [67346 x 2048 byte records] GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1d is ufs/var. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1e is ufs/compat. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1f is ufs/src. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1g is ufs/usr. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da0s1h is ufs/local. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da1s1d is ufs/obj. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da1s1e is ufs/ports. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da1s1f is ufs/scratch. GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider da1s1g is ufs/data. Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted WARNING: /compat was not properly dismounted WARNING: /homes was not properly dismounted /homes: superblock summary recomputed WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr/data was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr/local was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr/obj was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr/ports was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr/scratch was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr/src was not properly dismounted WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex pflog0: promiscuous mode enabled From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 12:48:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4078816A4D5 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:48:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thingy.apana.org.au (adsl-175.isp.net.au [202.1.119.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B801F43D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from fun by thingy.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CmX3h-00019w-00 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:48:09 +1100 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:48:09 +1100 To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20050106124809.GE2280@thingy.apana.org.au> References: <20050106071152.GF12003@lb.tenfour> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: David Gerard Subject: Worse is better (was Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:48:11 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt (tedm@toybox.placo.com) [050106 18:26]: > Name of the game with commercialized technology which is filled with example > after > of example of second and 3rd rater products that win the market from 1st > rater > products merely because their marketing is better. Let's see, in automotive > we have lap&shoulder belts vs 5 point harnesses, or for that matter airbags > vs seatbelts, > in television we have Betamax vs VHS, in computing we have Windows vs Mac, > NT vs OS/2, > Linux vs FreeBSD ... ;-) Unix vs. the more correct systems that came before it. See 'Worse is better' and 'The UNIX-HATERS Handbook': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIX-HATERS_Handbook A lot of it is 'the whole widget' - the technology is worse, but other reasons give a decisive advantage. VHS tapes ran longer sooner than Beta. Unix was cheap and portable. X was open source, NeWS wasn't. Etc. - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 12:55:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5C016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:55:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay102-f38.bay102.hotmail.com [64.4.61.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0504B43D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:55:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sangokoub@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 04:55:09 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 83.115.246.193 by by102fd.bay102.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:54:42 GMT X-Originating-IP: [83.115.246.193] X-Originating-Email: [sangokoub@hotmail.com] X-Sender: sangokoub@hotmail.com From: "k o u b" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:54:42 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2005 12:55:09.0644 (UTC) FILETIME=[F41BB8C0:01C4F3EE] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Can't ping between FreeBSD and Win2K... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:55:10 -0000 IPFW is initialized without any setup in the rc.conf file??? I was used the mini-install... it's automaticaly enable after installation?? TIA Mrachik. koub. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 12:58:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7D716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:58:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsrv2.tranzpeer.net (mxsrv2.tranzpeer.net [202.180.66.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6AA43D5A for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:58:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from idownes@slingshot.co.nz) Received: from wmsrv2.tranzpeer.net ([202.180.66.2] helo=localhost) by mxsrv2.tranzpeer.net with ESMTP (Exim 4.34) id 1CmXDO-000743-Gm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:58:10 +1300 Received: from p235.cpich1-n2.callplus.net.nz (p235.cpich1-n2.callplus.net.nz [202.180.105.235]) by ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:58:10 +1300 Message-ID: <20050107015810.reh4wc4co0gw8osw@webmail.slingshot.co.nz> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:58:10 +1300 From: idownes@slingshot.co.nz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.0-cvs X-Originating-IP: 202.180.105.235 Subject: Cardbus USB2 adaptor not working (NEC uPD)...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:58:12 -0000 hi, I am trying to get a cardbus to USB2 adpator working under 5.3 - release #0 on an IBM X22 laptop. The chips used are NEC uPD 9210 and NEC uPD 720100. They are probed but I get the "Resource not specified in CIS" error and the controllers get halted. Other people seem to have got this card working under FreeBSD (i.e. same chips) http://archive.pilgerer.org/mharc/html/freebsd-current/2003-06/msg00786.html can someone give me pointers as to how to get this working...? I've tried an old network card (cardbus) which gets recognised ok (can read the cis driver gets attached etc), but I've lost the dongle so can't really test it. The cardbus controller is sharing irq11 with my network interface. I get a stray irq9 message from the acpi when I reboot. interrupt total rate irq0: clk 479993 99 irq1: atkbd0 8007 1 irq8: rtc 614402 127 irq9: acpi0 9 0 irq10: cbb1 pcm0 174298 36 irq11: cbb0 fxp0++* 2577757 536 irq12: psm0 203424 42 irq13: npx0 1 0 irq14: ata0 37872 7 Total 4095763 853 The following is the output when I plug the card in with the system running... Status is 0x30000820 cbb0: card inserted: event=0x00000000, state=30000820 cbb0: cbb_power: 3V cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=1000 cardbus0: Non-prefetchable memory at c0202000-c0202fff ohci0: mem 0xc0202000-0xc0202fff irq 11 at device 0.0 on cardbus0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: OHCI version 1.0 usb3: unrecoverable error, controller halted usb3: blocking intrs 0x10 usb3: on ohci0 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=1000 cardbus0: Non-prefetchable memory at c0203000-c0203fff ohci1: mem 0xc0203000-0xc0203fff irq 11 at device 0.1 on cardbus0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb4: OHCI version 1.0 usb4: on ohci1 usb4: USB revision 1.0 uhub4: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100 cardbus0: Non-prefetchable memory at c0204000-c02040ff ehci0: mem 0xc0204000-0xc02040ff irq 11 at device 0.2 on cardbus0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci_pci_attach: companion usb3 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb4 usb5: EHCI version 1.0 usb5: companion controllers, 3 ports each: usb3 usb4 usb5: unrecoverable error, controller halted usb5: blocking intrs 0x10 usb5: run timeout ehci0: USB init failed err=13 device_attach: ehci0 attach returned 5 pciconf -lv gives ... ohci0@pci3:0:0: class=0x0c0310 card=0x00353083 chip=0x00351033 rev=0x43 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NEC Electronics Hong Kong' device = 'uPD9210/72010xx USB Open Host Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB ohci1@pci3:0:1: class=0x0c0310 card=0x00353083 chip=0x00351033 rev=0x43 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NEC Electronics Hong Kong' device = 'uPD9210/72010xx USB Open Host Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB ehci0@pci3:0:2: class=0x0c0320 card=0x00e03083 chip=0x00e01033 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NEC Electronics Hong Kong' device = 'uPD720100A/101 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB full dmesg is (with card already inserted)... Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 4 14:58:25 NZDT 2005 ian@ian.localhost:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/IAN Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) III Mobile CPU 800MHz (799.33-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 670498816 (639 MB) avail memory = 650657792 (620 MB) npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi_ec_ecdt_probe: can't get handle ACPI-0358: *** Error: Region EmbeddedControl(3) has no handler ACPI-1303: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__._INI] (Node 0xc1877700), AE_NOT_EXIST acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi_ec0: port 0x66,0x62 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 acpi_lid0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 ACPI link \\_SB_.LNKB has invalid initial irq 5, ignoring pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xd0000000-0xdfffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x1820-0x183f irq 11 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ums0: Microsoft Microsoft 3-Button Mouse with IntelliEye(TM), rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. uhci2: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 11 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 cbb0: mem 0x50000000-0x50000fff irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci2 cardbus0: on cbb0 pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 cbb1: mem 0x50100000-0x50100fff irq 10 at device 3.1 on pci2 cardbus1: on cbb1 pccard1: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb1 pci2: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) fxp0: port 0x7400-0x743f mem 0xc0200000-0xc0200fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci2 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:d0:59:d9:44:2e isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1860-0x186f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) pcm0: port 0x18c0-0x18ff,0x1c00-0x1cff irq 10 at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 8250 or not responding sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled acpi_cmbat0: on acpi0 acpi_acad0: on acpi0 sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xdc000-0xdffff,0xcd000-0xcdfff,0xcc000-0xccfff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled Timecounter "TSC" frequency 799325898 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 8 steps (100% to 12.5%), currently 100.0% cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=1000 ohci0: mem 0xc0202000-0xc0202fff irq 11 at device 0.0 on cardbus0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: OHCI version 1.0 ad0: 19077MB [41344/15/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a usb3: on ohci0 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=1000 ohci1: mem 0xc0203000-0xc0203fff irq 11 at device 0.1 on cardbus0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb4: OHCI version 1.0 usb4: on ohci1 usb4: USB revision 1.0 uhub4: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100 ehci0: mem 0xc0204000-0xc02040ff irq 11 at device 0.2 on cardbus0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci_pci_attach: companion usb3 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb4 usb5: EHCI version 1.0 usb5: companion controllers, 3 ports each: usb3 usb4 usb5: unrecoverable error, controller halted usb5: blocking intrs 0x10 usb5: run timeout ehci0: USB init failed err=13 device_attach: ehci0 attach returned 5 ltmdm0: port 0x7000-0x70ff,0x7440-0x7447 mem 0xc0201000-0xc02010ff irq 11 at device 5.0 on pci2 ltmdm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ltmdm0: type Virtual 16550A cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100 ehci0: mem 0xc0204000-0xc02040ff irq 11 at device 0.2 on cardbus0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci_pci_attach: companion usb3 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb4 usb5: EHCI version 1.0 usb5: companion controllers, 3 ports each: usb3 usb4 usb5: unrecoverable error, controller halted usb5: blocking intrs 0x10 usb5: run timeout ehci0: USB init failed err=13 device_attach: ehci0 attach returned 5 thanks and please say if there is anymore information I can supply Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 12:59:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D108E16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:59:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E3F43D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:59:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from FreeBSD@amadeus.demon.nl) Received: from amadeus.demon.nl ([82.161.18.200]:63093 helo=[10.0.1.1]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmXEM-00074b-Ll; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:59:11 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <200501050943.50806.algould@datawok.com> References: <56BC8436-5E81-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <4469EBCA-5E84-11D9-A810-000A9592DF7A@lanoticia.com> <200501050943.50806.algould@datawok.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: FreeBSD questions mailing list Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:59:08 +0100 To: freebsd , Timothy Luoma X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Re: iTunes server SUCCESS!! Here are my notes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:59:14 -0000 >> >> Oh, there's one big caveat: there's apparently no way to tell iTunes >> to look for a iTunes server, it does it automatically... and I >> presume that it would NOT work over the internet, perhaps not even >> over a different subnet. >> >> TjL hi, here's a link to an application that will allow your iTunes to listen to a streaming iTunes server on the internet: http://ileech.sourceforge.net/index.php?content=RendezvousProxy-Tutorial have fun Arno From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 13:00:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B2116A4CE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:00:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056C143D49; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:00:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j06CxohY014093; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:29:51 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:29:37 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <41DD3326.4050908@uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <41DD3326.4050908@uni-mainz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1579609.mu2fYa75mc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200501062329.48692.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -5.4 () IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: "O. Hartmann" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: copying from DVD drive causes crash: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:00:05 -0000 --nextPart1579609.mu2fYa75mc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:16, O. Hartmann wrote: > Doing dd from the DVD drive (NEC ND 3500AG/2.18) fails in a corrupt > image afterwards, copying with 'cp' from a inserted CD triggers the > shown error and box dies immediately: > > > Jan 6 12:17:20 edda kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension > Jan 6 12:17:50 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST > asc=3D0x64 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D4 > Jan 6 12:18:07 edda last message repeated 3 times > Jan 6 12:29:44 edda kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension > Jan 6 12:30:54 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR > asc=3D0x11 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D4 > Jan 6 12:30:54 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) > Jan 6 12:30:58 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR > asc=3D0x11 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D4 > Jan 6 12:30:58 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) > Jan 6 12:31:01 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR > asc=3D0x11 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D4 > Jan 6 12:31:01 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) > Jan 6 12:31:08 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR > asc=3D0x11 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D4 > Jan 6 12:31:08 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) > Jan 6 12:31:19 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR > asc=3D0x11 ascq=3D0x00 error=3D4 > Same happens when trying to to a 'tar ztf file.foo' (tar archive located > on DVD) -> FreeBSD dies and freezes immediately. Does it panic or hang? The DVD has errors on it which is why you can't read it.. Obviously the OS= =20 crashing when presented with bad media is not a good thing :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1579609.mu2fYa75mc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB3TZE5ZPcIHs/zowRAldgAKCQuttYBMBo9bG69vlPyitf5cpfAgCfbnwb Op1AlwHKxLLI9OT1wfe4vIo= =EwV8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1579609.mu2fYa75mc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 13:06:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1035B16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:06:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chrononomicon.com (chrononomicon.com [216.37.143.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B114A43D2D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:06:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [192.168.0.42] (unknown [192.168.0.42]) by mail.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC6F2EAF19 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:06:11 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <41DCB3C4.1070203@vilot.com> References: <20050105193119.A29486@logik.ath.cx> <41DCB3C4.1070203@vilot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:06:11 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Re: Uptime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:06:13 -0000 On Jan 5, 2005, at 10:43 PM, Tom Vilot wrote: > Mark wrote: > >> So, we know BSD is capable of stupidly high uptime, but what >> I'd like to know is how? I mean, we all have to patch things >> now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these >> sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels,... >> > > Yep!! (AFAIK) Clusters that lie about uptimes because machine A goes down but machine B still is up? It's how I thought Windows was ever on that list... :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 13:10:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EEC16A4CF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:10:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chrononomicon.com (chrononomicon.com [216.37.143.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB7343D55 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:10:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [192.168.0.42] (unknown [192.168.0.42]) by mail.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164622EB04C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:10:31 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <190.36a29286.2f0dcb2d@aol.com> References: <190.36a29286.2f0dcb2d@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <581843E8-5FE4-11D9-AF88-000D932C89A2@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:10:31 -0500 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:10:32 -0000 On Jan 5, 2005, at 5:58 PM, Tm4528@aol.com wrote: > The "tranquility" of this list is apparently because the people on > this list > are too technically incompetent to realize how badly botched 5.x is. > > "thank you master, thank you for helping me get my mouse working, let > me kiss your boots" Quick questions... If you don't like the OS and think everyone is incompetent and you could design and implement a better system with your fingers superglued together and a blindfold on, why are you using *BSD? If you're not using *BSD, why are you wasting your time on the list at all? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 13:28:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5925016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:28:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790B843D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:28:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j06DSKYZ057342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:28:20 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j06DSKgI057339; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:28:20 +0700 (ICT) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:28:20 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200501061328.j06DSKgI057339@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: Packet drop in bridging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:28:24 -0000 Hi, I have a firewall in bridging mode, using ipf. I upgraded to 4.10-p5 and now I have a bunch of error message: bdg_forward drop MULTICAST PKT /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c line 609 Any clue what I am missing (sysctl or kernel) Thank you, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 13:33:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E68A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:33:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cheyenne.wixb.com (cheyenne.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9155343D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:33:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Organization: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee WI USA Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106073009.00c6d140@cheyenne.wixb.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:33:05 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "J.D. Bronson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: 5.3 backup solution needed (non-SCSI) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:33:07 -0000 I finally found the reason my 5.3 machine was randomly rebooting. It is either the scsi HBA and/or the drive. Although the same exact hardware runs any other OS fine :-/ well with that in mind, I am now all IDE and USB capable. No more SCSI....so there went my tape backup solution. I need to backup only about 4-5GB at once. My DDS SCSI drive handled that fine... Does anyone know of an IDE based solution -or- a USB backup solution? This is a 1U rack server, so if I used IDE based, I would have to open the machine and jury rigg it any time I needed to backup. I have dual standard USB ports though, on the front of the server. Any ideas will be appreciated ! -JEFF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 13:51:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0126E16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:51:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from parrot.aev.net (host29-15.pool8174.interbusiness.it [81.74.15.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235AB43D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:51:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-16-6.41-151.net24.it [151.41.6.16]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j06E1mla026285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:01:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Received: from netfence.it (xanatar.ventu [10.1.2.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.ventu (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j06DohOl082202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:50:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it) Message-ID: <41DD42F8.7080907@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:54:00 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli Organization: NetFence User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040117 X-Accept-Language: it,en,fr,de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Subject: 3D CAD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:51:41 -0000 Hello. As from subject: does a simple usable 3D CAD system exist for FreeBSD? Something on the line of QCAD, but 3D. Free at best, but also free for personal use can do. I've looked into the port tree: many electrical CAD and some big app like Blender for animations, but nothing a bit more techincal as I need. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 13:52:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA70816A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:52:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC1843D54 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:52:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j06DqBFT014018 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:52:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:54:01 -0500 (EST) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: FreeBSD Questions List Message-ID: <20050106084148.U7051@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Lossing network connectivity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:52:12 -0000 Have a new machine that I installed 5.3 release. Has been working for a week. Yesterday it started to loose network connectivity. ifconfig -u shows the interface as active, but ping to any other machine in the subnet fails. Looked at /var/log and did not see any errors or messages to hint what the problem may be. Switched the port in the switch where the cable was connected and tried a different cable from another machine that is working. A reboot seemed to fix it momentarily. Booting windows just to test connectivity and windows had connectivity with no problems. At one point got "no media" no matter which cable/port I used, but then it seemed to see the network all by itself again. There was one message on the screen this time SK0 watchdog timeout. appears and after that connectivity is restored... at least for now.. Any clues? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:05:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D88616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:05:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cheyenne.wixb.com (cheyenne.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B28F43D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:05:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Organization: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee WI USA Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106080413.00c43fe8@cheyenne.wixb.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:05:41 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "J.D. Bronson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: 5.3 - starting a process as a diff user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:05:42 -0000 I have a daemon that I need to start at boot under /usr/local/etc/rc.d and I need it to run as a specific user. Currently, from root, I su - {userid} and then launch it and then log out. Can I make this automated in /usr/local/etc/rc.d and if so how? Thanks :) -JEFF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:13:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28D916A4CF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:13:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7139343D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:13:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from weird0.kid@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so81842rne for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:13:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JGmUFV6SvlWHhfEVmZQMshwX3NvT6/FLEe/xAACVlbJtuY4C+GLjjbXJoLF2W3SGKYf0KN+1b5B7JOuQWfI/0D1B+dm+Xq/iG/oa1kKta3pmcgneN+3qd9ilBHD1StJR5KhgzclQy8sMwda9P8b0i1gdveo+mYTuSNGqisOWeEE= Received: by 10.38.104.52 with SMTP id b52mr14736rnc; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:13:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.150.59 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:13:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:13:42 +0200 From: Ludwig Mey To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ludwig Mey List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:13:44 -0000 hi my problem is as follows. i am trying to connect a Prolific Technology USB to serial connecter. but i am unable to get anything right after that. i have tried using minicom and pointing it to where the system is telling the device is. but no luck. any help will be appreciated. i am running FreeBSD 5.3 and the following information is given to me by the system when the device is plugged in. Jan 6 16:07:26 gogga kernel: ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:23:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D4A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:23:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D26243D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:23:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3])j06EN1fY073402 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:23:01 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 166 Received: from galois2.math.jussieu.fr (galois2.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.117])j06EMvcO009122 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:22:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from galois2.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) j06EMv4Z004409 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:22:57 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by galois2.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j06EMvIh004408 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:22:57 +0100 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:22:57 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106142257.GA30323@math.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -2.82 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:23:01 +0100 (CET) X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 41DD49C5.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr Subject: Create tgz packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:23:03 -0000 Hi Happy new year (I known i'm late). Suppose I have two computer, one very fast and one very slow, I want compile some application (with ports) on the fast and put in slow computer. But I can not use some tar or rsync (hard to explain why but trust me I can) I want to create a tgz file and transfert it to slow computer to install. How can I do that or where can I find some documentation for that. Lots of thanks. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Tel : 01 44 27 86 88 FAX : 01 44 27 69 35 GSM(UFR) : 06 85 05 58 43 Heure local/Local time: Thu Jan 6 15:19:37 CET 2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:27:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1206316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:27:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D2743D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:27:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j06ERNAu038692; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:27:23 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: Ludwig Mey In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:27:23 +0000 Message-Id: <1105021643.708.51.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:27:19 -0000 On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 16:13 +0200, Ludwig Mey wrote: > hi > > my problem is as follows. > > i am trying to connect a Prolific Technology USB to serial connecter. > but i am unable to get anything right after that. i have tried using > minicom and pointing it to where the system is telling the device is. > but no luck. any help will be appreciated. > > i am running FreeBSD 5.3 > > and the following information is given to me by the system when the > device is plugged in. > > Jan 6 16:07:26 gogga kernel: ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. > USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 I think you might need to compile a custom kernel with the added line: device ucom Then you should see something like: Jan 6 14:26:17 lorna kernel: ucom0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 when you plug it in. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:32:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B190316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:32:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E1243D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j06EW9Br040106; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:32:20 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106073009.00c6d140@cheyenne.wixb.com> References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106073009.00c6d140@cheyenne.wixb.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:32:09 +0000 Message-Id: <1105021929.708.57.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 backup solution needed (non-SCSI) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:32:14 -0000 On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 07:33 -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I finally found the reason my 5.3 machine was randomly rebooting. > It is either the scsi HBA and/or the drive. Although the same exact > hardware runs any other OS fine :-/ > > well with that in mind, I am now all IDE and USB capable. > No more SCSI....so there went my tape backup solution. > > I need to backup only about 4-5GB at once. My DDS SCSI drive handled that > fine... > > Does anyone know of an IDE based solution -or- a USB backup solution? A usb external hard drive? Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:32:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692AC16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:32:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from havoc.eusc.inter.net (havoc.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE6243D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:32:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from plexus@snafu.de) Received: from pd9e7bdfb.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.231.189.251] helo=[192.168.1.17]) by havoc.eusc.inter.net with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 1CmYgX-0000gt-00; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:32:21 +0100 Message-ID: <41DD4BF3.8060102@snafu.de> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:32:19 +0100 From: Oliver Boris Fischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: shih@math.jussieu.fr References: <20050106142257.GA30323@math.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050106142257.GA30323@math.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Create tgz packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:32:23 -0000 Albert Shih wrote: > I want to create a tgz file and transfert it to slow computer to > install. How can I do that or where can I find some documentation for that. Go to your ports directory and type make package. make will build your port and a .tag in /packages. For more information please read the ports manpage (man ports). MfG Oliver Fischer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:36:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB5B16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:36:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cheyenne.wixb.com (cheyenne.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5001E43D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:36:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Organization: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee WI USA Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106083508.00bf2650@cheyenne.wixb.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:36:07 -0600 To: Peter Risdon From: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <1105021929.708.57.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106073009.00c6d140@cheyenne.wixb.com> <1105021929.708.57.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 backup solution needed (non-SCSI) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:36:08 -0000 At 08:32 AM 1/6/2005, Peter Risdon wrote: >On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 07:33 -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > > I finally found the reason my 5.3 machine was randomly rebooting. > > It is either the scsi HBA and/or the drive. Although the same exact > > hardware runs any other OS fine :-/ > > > > well with that in mind, I am now all IDE and USB capable. > > No more SCSI....so there went my tape backup solution. > > > > I need to backup only about 4-5GB at once. My DDS SCSI drive handled that > > fine... > > > > Does anyone know of an IDE based solution -or- a USB backup solution? >A usb external hard drive? > >Peter. Thats a great idea....I hadnt thought of that and recovery is MUCH faster. Anyone have any recommendations on a manufacturer and source? I would need 2 of these...since I have 2 servers. Thanks guys! -JEFF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 15:01:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B0F16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:01:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54107.mail.yahoo.com (web54107.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A618843D31 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:01:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saigon_ca@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 12364 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2005 15:01:23 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=0b6PU84O+1CpOZgVyNP4FHnwILpAxTSVdVCOihgv+Y+CcYC1bnylqNNZlwinOdoTkkC+vIMpzzvuxLysNCN3dqfAtrjQDyZvjJZdqeR6rFU3uriRC772i2hfHCNgYpZVnQywqWw9Ag0X4fe+OFRnUNetK7nphbZA4PpHH6aCDtk= ; Message-ID: <20050105150123.12362.qmail@web54107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [136.1.1.101] by web54107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:01:23 CST Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:01:23 +0800 (CST) From: Kangaroo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:39:55 +0000 Subject: HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:01:24 -0000 I still have problems install FreeBSD 5.x on Compaq LapTop R3240CA model . AMD Athlon 64 Nvidia chipset. Booting from the cd either i386 or AMD 64 with or without acpi disable still automatically shutdown the power . How to get around with it? Does FreeBSD development group aware of this model laptop? Is there any patch in near future? Thanks Kangaroo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 5 15:01:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F03D16A4CE for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:01:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54108.mail.yahoo.com (web54108.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72AAA43D2F for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:01:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saigon_ca@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 71755 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Jan 2005 15:01:18 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=UdwmlD/Tr684JMAoPSB4hiUO4QC3b/NJqGIhdDTTX7r2Bn1UfzpZEQPfVoRS851vyQerdqOtYw0ORmDN5UlDvFzuB5U70IyVF+XTm58++763rGJgeuAWO00EMauOT3BB/XhJofoNSWS54YuMOO8LpE8P0/eyLbNZjyLB0eVEtGc= ; Message-ID: <20050105150114.71717.qmail@web54108.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [136.1.1.101] by web54108.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:01:14 CST Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:01:14 +0800 (CST) From: Kangaroo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:39:55 +0000 Subject: HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:01:25 -0000 I still have problems install FreeBSD 5.x on Compaq LapTop R3240CA model . AMD Athlon 64 Nvidia chipset. Booting from the cd either i386 or AMD 64 with or without acpi disable still automatically shutdown the power . How to get around with it? Does FreeBSD development group aware of this model laptop? Is there any patch in near future? Thanks Kangaroo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:47:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E0C16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:47:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7694743D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:47:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j06El8BF051091; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:47:08 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106083508.00bf2650@cheyenne.wixb.com> References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106073009.00c6d140@cheyenne.wixb.com> <1105021929.708.57.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20050106083508.00bf2650@cheyenne.wixb.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:47:07 +0000 Message-Id: <1105022827.708.62.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 backup solution needed (non-SCSI) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:47:02 -0000 On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 08:36 -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > At 08:32 AM 1/6/2005, Peter Risdon wrote: > >On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 07:33 -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: [...] > > > I need to backup only about 4-5GB at once. My DDS SCSI drive handled that > > > fine... > > > > > > Does anyone know of an IDE based solution -or- a USB backup solution? > > > > >A usb external hard drive? > > > >Peter. > > > Thats a great idea....I hadnt thought of that and recovery is MUCH faster. > Anyone have any recommendations on a manufacturer and source? > > I would need 2 of these...since I have 2 servers. I have a client rotating two Maxtor 250GB usb hard drives. It's all OK after 6 months. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:56:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A190D16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:56:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cheyenne.wixb.com (cheyenne.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5718643D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:56:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Organization: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee WI USA Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106085144.02172c88@cheyenne.wixb.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:56:45 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "J.D. Bronson" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: finally a crash dump on 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:56:46 -0000 I was up for 2wks and today saw this: Fatal trap 12 - page fault while in kernel mode CPUID 0 APIC ID 0 Fault write address = 0x418ad66c Fault code = supervisor write, page not present Inst Pointer = 0x8:0xc05109d9 Stack Pointer = 0x10:0xe5ea8978 Frame Pointer = 0x10:0xe5ea8994 Code Segment base 0x0 limit 0xffff type 0x1b DPL 0, PRES 1 def 32 1, gran 1 current process = 7673 (telnetd) -JEFF ..I had thought this was SCSI, but I dont have any scsi drives installed and was running on IDE. What do I do with this information now that I finally have it ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 14:58:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AA116A4CE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:58:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC9743D1D; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:58:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from [134.93.183.16] (edda.Geo.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.183.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C17300118E; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:58:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DD5211.7040807@uni-mainz.de> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:58:25 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Institut =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr_Geophysik?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-AT; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050102 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel O'Connor References: <41DD3326.4050908@uni-mainz.de> <200501062329.48692.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200501062329.48692.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-mainz.de cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: copying from DVD drive causes crash: vm_fault: pager readerror, pid 13421 (cp) on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:58:19 -0000 Daniel O'Connor schrieb: >On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:16, O. Hartmann wrote: > > >>Doing dd from the DVD drive (NEC ND 3500AG/2.18) fails in a corrupt >>image afterwards, copying with 'cp' from a inserted CD triggers the >>shown error and box dies immediately: >> >> >>Jan 6 12:17:20 edda kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension >>Jan 6 12:17:50 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST >>asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>Jan 6 12:18:07 edda last message repeated 3 times >>Jan 6 12:29:44 edda kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension >>Jan 6 12:30:54 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>Jan 6 12:30:54 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) >>Jan 6 12:30:58 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>Jan 6 12:30:58 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) >>Jan 6 12:31:01 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>Jan 6 12:31:01 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) >>Jan 6 12:31:08 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>Jan 6 12:31:08 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) >>Jan 6 12:31:19 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4> >>Same happens when trying to to a 'tar ztf file.foo' (tar archive located >>on DVD) -> FreeBSD dies and freezes immediately. >> >> > >Does it panic or hang? > >The DVD has errors on it which is why you can't read it.. Obviously the OS >crashing when presented with bad media is not a good thing :) > > > The box hang. The media is all right, I tried it on a FreeBSD 4.10 box and a Windows box (equipted with the same DVD-RW drive, running on a different hardware platform). Writing 'clear' images to the drive results in corrupted media, either DVD and/or CD-R/W. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:02:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9640516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:02:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stewie.obfuscated.net (stewie.obfuscated.net [66.118.188.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7E843D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:02:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@obmail.net) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (653259hfc120.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.59.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by stewie.obfuscated.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040876104 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:02:41 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: M Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:01:54 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: SMP and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:02:42 -0000 I have a system that is being used as a high performance NFS server FreeBSD nfs2 5.3-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #1: Tue Jan 4 19:14:40 EST 2005 root@nfs2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS i386 Two CPUs (tried hyperthreading and not), 4 GB of memory CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2400.10-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 4160225280 (3967 MB) avail memory = 4073271296 (3884 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 6 The NFS exported filesystem is on a Q-Logic FC card isp0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xf8300000-0xf8300fff irq 28 at device 3.0 on pci3 isp0: [GIANT-LOCKED] The disk is formated UFS2 and is big, but not *that* big yet /dev/da1s1d 471860682 206516934 227594894 48% /usr/local/export Every 12 hours or so the system crashes with a hard lock and no error messages in /var/log/messages or on the screen. I've moved all the disks to a duplicate system. If it continues to lock hard what's the possibility the issue is SMP? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:15:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C016716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:15:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A659C43D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:15:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59356FD049; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:15:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DD5618.6070801@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:15:36 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: M References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:15:42 -0000 M wrote: > I have a system that is being used as a high performance NFS server > > FreeBSD nfs2 5.3-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #1: Tue Jan 4 > 19:14:40 EST 2005 root@nfs2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS i386 > > Two CPUs (tried hyperthreading and not), 4 GB of memory > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2400.10-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 > > Features=0xbfebfbff ,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HT > T,TM,PBE> > Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs > real memory = 4160225280 (3967 MB) > avail memory = 4073271296 (3884 MB) > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 6 > > The NFS exported filesystem is on a Q-Logic FC card > > isp0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem > 0xf8300000-0xf8300fff irq 28 at device 3.0 on pci3 > isp0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > The disk is formated UFS2 and is big, but not *that* big yet > > /dev/da1s1d 471860682 206516934 227594894 48% /usr/local/export > > Every 12 hours or so the system crashes with a hard lock and no error > messages in /var/log/messages or on the screen. I've moved all the > disks to a duplicate system. If it continues to lock hard what's the > possibility the issue is SMP? See this message from yesterday (submitted to announce): ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ERRATA/notices/FreeBSD-EN-05:01.nfs.asc In short, update your system. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:29:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE33B16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:29:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B49243D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:29:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@jwebmedia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (66.49.54.54.nw.nuvox.net [66.49.54.54]) j06FTlgH017416; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:29:48 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:29:24 -0600 From: "Joseph Koenig (jWeb)" To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200501050933370399.9889C69A@mail.intradyn.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit cc: Henry Miller Subject: Re: Hardware or OS problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:29:35 -0000 > On 1/5/2005 at 09:14 Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The system > is >> FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the kicker) > 73GB >> RAID 1 ATA drives. The system serves as a web/database server > dedicated to >> 1 >> site. Daily the system goes out and downloads real estate listings > (via >> shell scripts and cURL) and processes them (via PHP into MySQL). Also, >> nightly the system downloads a zipped set of images (probably around >> 400-500) and processes them into thumbnails (PHP scripts calling >> ImageMagick). Over the last week or two, the system is crashing and >> rebooting into single user mode. It's not consistently during updates, > or >> resizing of images, or anything like that. Yesterday, it crashed with > 99% >> processor idle and load averages of 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- I was watching a >> 'top' >> when the machine died. When it boots into single user mode, an fsck > must be >> run, which identified a few corrupt JPEG files -- however, the > sysadmin who >> reboots it never tells me which files they are. The sysadmin is > convinced >> it >> is a FreeBSD problem and says that Linux will not crash because of a >> corrupt >> file and if it does, will not boot into single user mode and he will > be >> able >> to access it remotely to do the fsck. About 3-4 weeks ago, one of the >> drives >> in the mirror set crashed and had to be replaced. I'm not convinced > that >> drives are not to blame for these issues. Is there any way to verify > that? >> Is it possible a corrupt JPEG on the drive could cause the system to > crash >> randomly? What can I do to correctly identify the problem so that we > can >> fix >> it and not change the OS? Thanks, > > The sysadmin has no clue about either linux or freebsd! > > A corrupt JPEG cannot cause a crash of the OS, for any real OS. (If it > does, it is a bug in the OS, but I doubt one exists) Real OS includes > Windows XP, linux, and FreeBSD. > > However, an OS crash can cause a corrupt JPEG! > > Either linux or FreeBSD may boot into single user mode when the > filesystem is corrupt. What your sysadmin means is that with one of > the newer filesystems Linux uses journeling, which is much less likely > to enter this situation, but it still can happen. With soft updates > FreeBSD is in the same situation as linux, but softupdates is > (generally, there are exceptions) better than journeling. There is > softupdates in Freebsd 4.9, but I'm not sure how to enable it, or how > good it is. (in 5.3 it is awesome!) > > I suspect hardware. > > I'd burn memtest to a CD, and run that for a few hours to see if > something is identified. Memtest won't catch everything, but it does > a pretty good job. > > Also look at other factors. Does the HVAC kick in when this happens? > Is someone hitting the panic stop switch? Situations like that have > happened, and they can take a while to debug. They are not likely, but > don't rule them out. > > FreeBSD 4.9 is fairly old at this point. You should seriously > consider upgrading to 4.11 (due out in a few weeks), or 5.3 (my > recommendation, but a much more involved upgrade). > In addition, to the original problem stated above, we are seeing a number of problems like "...in free(): warning: modified (page-) pointer" and "...in free(): warning: chunk is already free". I have them admin running a memtest today, but wanted to make sure these errors were not indicative of something else going on. Thanks, Joe Koenig Production Manager jWeb New Media Design joe@jWebmedia.com http://www.jwebmedia.com/ 636.928.3162 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:31:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E2316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:31:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882A343D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:31:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-208-232.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.208.232]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j06FVGaf006546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:31:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41DD599D.4070207@mac.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:30:37 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gerard-seibert@rcn.com References: <20050106052050.9236.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> <41DD1869.6030502@mac.com> <20050106065102.7B36.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> In-Reply-To: <20050106065102.7B36.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.5 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on pi.codefab.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Configuring POSTFIX to use mutiple email accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:31:26 -0000 Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Thursday, January 06, 2005 5:52:25 AM Chuck Swiger wrote: [ ... ] > Therefore, if I have several email addresses that are through different > ISP's, don't I have to configure POSTFIX fir each of them? Nope, you only need to use one MX relay, so long as it is willing to accept your mail. Depending on your circumstances (ie, whether you've paid for a static IP), you might even be able to do mail entirely for yourself, without having to relay through any ISP. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:32:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AC116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:32:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vs3.bgnett.no (vs3.bgnett.no [194.54.96.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500B843D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:32:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no.bgnett.no (amidala.datadok.no [194.54.103.98]) by vs3.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j06FVh5n094980 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:31:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Sender: peter@amidala.datadok.no To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050105193119.A29486@logik.ath.cx> From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: 06 Jan 2005 16:31:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20050105193119.A29486@logik.ath.cx> Message-ID: <86d5wimv53.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Uptime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:32:01 -0000 Mark writes: > now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these > sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels, or is > there some black magic going on that I don't know about? OF COURSE there's black magic involved. It involves daemons, chickens and a few other items I could tell you about if %#^ NO CARRIER -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:32:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66CD16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:32:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEF343D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a041.otenet.gr [212.205.215.41]) j06FWoQN007917; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:32:53 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j06FWoio027858; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:32:50 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j06FWnIA027857; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:32:49 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:32:49 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "J.D. Bronson" Message-ID: <20050106153249.GA27782@gothmog.gr> References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106085144.02172c88@cheyenne.wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106085144.02172c88@cheyenne.wixb.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finally a crash dump on 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:32:59 -0000 On 2005-01-06 08:56, "J.D. Bronson" wrote: > I was up for 2wks and today saw this: > > Fatal trap 12 - page fault while in kernel mode > CPUID 0 APIC ID 0 > Fault write address = 0x418ad66c > Fault code = supervisor write, page not present > [...] > > What do I do with this information now that I finally have it ? During the next boot, savecore should save a crash dump in /var/crash (assuming one was successfully saved in swap when the crash happened). Look at the Developers Handbook for details about obtaining a stack trace of the kernel at the moment of the crash: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:34:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DD116A4CF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:34:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D791B43D58 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:34:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkinkade@fastmail.fm) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0AAC4A693; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:34:18 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: Lo9f1kRU2Cai8JOcWgXnuw 1105025656 Received: from gentoo-npk.bmp.ub (unknown [206.27.244.136]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B2E57034F; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:34:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from nkinkade by gentoo-npk.bmp.ub with local (Exim 4.21) id 1CmZeQ-0002fc-E7; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:34:14 -0600 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 09:34:14 -0600 From: Nathan Kinkade To: Petre Bandac Message-ID: <20050106153414.GD3639@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub> Mail-Followup-To: Petre Bandac , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050104225259.1b917a6c@xxl.rdsbv.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qKojvbh47KHQqxue" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050104225259.1b917a6c@xxl.rdsbv.ro> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newsyslog & syslogd on 5.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:34:24 -0000 --qKojvbh47KHQqxue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:52:59PM +0200, Petre Bandac wrote: > where from is newsyslog being called to rotate the logs ? (from what I > read in the manpages, its only task is to rotate the logs); I can't > find it in /etc/periodic >=20 > thanks, >=20 > petre It's a system cron job. Check /etc/crontab. Nathan --qKojvbh47KHQqxue Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB3Vp2O0ZIEthSfkkRAkTnAKDpedMnl4lizmYlAcBhE/djgpXrlACgs87A IGb8htDyHpGilnFG3Q4QGcI= =fDBZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qKojvbh47KHQqxue-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:43:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AB716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:43:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BBF43D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:43:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3])j06FhWXP008874 ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:43:32 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 166 Received: from galois2.math.jussieu.fr (galois2.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.117])j06FhRcO019671 ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:43:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from galois2.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) j06FhR4Z014123 ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:43:27 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by galois2.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j06FhRV2014122; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:43:27 +0100 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:43:27 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: M Message-ID: <20050106154327.GI30323@math.jussieu.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -2.82 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:43:32 +0100 (CET) X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 41DD5CA4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:43:33 -0000 Le 06/01/2005 à 10:01:54-0500, M a écrit > I have a system that is being used as a high performance NFS server > > FreeBSD nfs2 5.3-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #1: Tue Jan 4 > 19:14:40 EST 2005 root@nfs2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS i386 > > messages in /var/log/messages or on the screen. I've moved all the > disks to a duplicate system. If it continues to lock hard what's the > possibility the issue is SMP? cvsup you source and you can see in /usr/src/UPDATING 20050103: p3 FreeBSD-EN-05:01.nfs Correct a bug in nfsrv_create() where a call to nfsrv_access() might be made while holding the NFS server mutex, which resulted in kernel panics under certain load patterns. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Tel : 01 44 27 86 88 FAX : 01 44 27 69 35 GSM(UFR) : 06 85 05 58 43 Heure local/Local time: Thu Jan 6 16:43:16 CET 2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:44:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2C616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:44:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cheyenne.wixb.com (cheyenne.wixb.com [65.43.82.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A81743D5C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:44:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbronson@wixb.com) Organization: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee WI USA Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106094422.021d9080@cheyenne.wixb.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:44:33 -0600 To: Giorgos Keramidas From: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <20050106153249.GA27782@gothmog.gr> References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106085144.02172c88@cheyenne.wixb.com> <20050106153249.GA27782@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finally a crash dump on 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:44:34 -0000 At 09:32 AM 1/6/2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2005-01-06 08:56, "J.D. Bronson" wrote: > > I was up for 2wks and today saw this: > > > > Fatal trap 12 - page fault while in kernel mode > > CPUID 0 APIC ID 0 > > Fault write address = 0x418ad66c > > Fault code = supervisor write, page not present > > [...] > > > > What do I do with this information now that I finally have it ? > >During the next boot, savecore should save a crash dump in /var/crash >(assuming one was successfully saved in swap when the crash happened). > >Look at the Developers Handbook for details about obtaining a stack >trace of the kernel at the moment of the crash: >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html Well so much for that idea :( 9:43:24am /var/crash> ls -al total 6 drwxr-x--- 2 root wheel 512 Dec 29 18:25 . drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 512 Jan 6 09:37 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5 Nov 4 19:27 minfree -- J.D. Bronson Aurora Health Care // Information Services // Milwaukee, WI USA Office: 414.978.8282 // Email: jd@aurora.org // Pager: 414.314.8282 This message should contain confidential and/or privileged information, but it doesn't. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, go ahead, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein that you wish, what the heck! If you have received this message in error, please ask the sender what the heck they were thinking about. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:46:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D3716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:46:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36E743D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:46:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j06FkJmA009949; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:46:19 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: "J.D. Bronson" In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106094422.021d9080@cheyenne.wixb.com> References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106085144.02172c88@cheyenne.wixb.com> <20050106153249.GA27782@gothmog.gr> <6.2.0.14.2.20050106094422.021d9080@cheyenne.wixb.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:46:19 +0000 Message-Id: <1105026379.708.65.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Giorgos Keramidas cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finally a crash dump on 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:46:22 -0000 On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 09:44 -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > At 09:32 AM 1/6/2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >On 2005-01-06 08:56, "J.D. Bronson" wrote: > > > I was up for 2wks and today saw this: > > > > > > Fatal trap 12 - page fault while in kernel mode > > > CPUID 0 APIC ID 0 > > > Fault write address = 0x418ad66c > > > Fault code = supervisor write, page not present > > > [...] > > > > > > What do I do with this information now that I finally have it ? > > > >During the next boot, savecore should save a crash dump in /var/crash > >(assuming one was successfully saved in swap when the crash happened). > > > >Look at the Developers Handbook for details about obtaining a stack > >trace of the kernel at the moment of the crash: > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html > > > Well so much for that idea :( > > 9:43:24am /var/crash> ls -al > total 6 > drwxr-x--- 2 root wheel 512 Dec 29 18:25 . > drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 512 Jan 6 09:37 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5 Nov 4 19:27 minfree Call me old-fashioned, but I'd run memtest. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:47:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C011A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:47:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC3A43D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:47:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a041.otenet.gr [212.205.215.41]) j06Fle4w005015; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:47:41 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j06FldtY028222; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:47:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j06FldS2028221; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:47:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:47:38 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "J.D. Bronson" Message-ID: <20050106154738.GA28199@gothmog.gr> References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106085144.02172c88@cheyenne.wixb.com> <20050106153249.GA27782@gothmog.gr> <6.2.0.14.2.20050106094422.021d9080@cheyenne.wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106094422.021d9080@cheyenne.wixb.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finally a crash dump on 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:47:44 -0000 On 2005-01-06 09:44, "J.D. Bronson" wrote: > At 09:32 AM 1/6/2005, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >On 2005-01-06 08:56, "J.D. Bronson" wrote: > >> I was up for 2wks and today saw this: > >> > >> Fatal trap 12 - page fault while in kernel mode > >> CPUID 0 APIC ID 0 > >> Fault write address = 0x418ad66c > >> Fault code = supervisor write, page not present > >> > >> What do I do with this information now that I finally have it ? > > > > During the next boot, savecore should save a crash dump in > > /var/crash (assuming one was successfully saved in swap when the > > crash happened). > > > > Look at the Developers Handbook for details about obtaining a stack > > trace of the kernel at the moment of the crash: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html > > Well so much for that idea :( > > 9:43:24am /var/crash> ls -al > total 6 > drwxr-x--- 2 root wheel 512 Dec 29 18:25 . > drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 512 Jan 6 09:37 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5 Nov 4 19:27 minfree Then you are still seeing crashes without a dump :-( - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:50:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F1616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:50:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC5B43D54 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:50:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CmZtc-0004Go-It; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:49:56 +0100 Message-ID: <41DD5E24.905@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:49:56 +0100 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041124 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Norgaard References: <41DD5618.6070801@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <41DD5618.6070801@locolomo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.systemnfs2 5.3-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #1: Tue Jan 4 >> 19:14:40 EST 2005 root@nfs2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS i386 >> >> Two CPUs (tried hyperthreading and not), 4 GB of memory >> >> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM)= 0xf29 Stepping = 9 >> >> Features=0xbfebfbff> ,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HT >> 4160225280 (3967 MB) >> avail memory = 4073271296 (3884 MB) >> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs >> cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 >> Q-Logic FC card >> >> isp0: port pci3but48%a hard lock and no >> error messages in /var/log/messages or on the screen. I've moved all >> the disks to a duplicate system. If it> > See this message from yesterday (submitted to announce): > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ERRATA/notices/FreeBSD-EN-05:01.nfs.asc > > In short, update your system. > > Cheers, Erik [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- cc: M cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:50:05 -0000 Erik Norgaard wrote: > M wrote: > >> I have a system that is being used as a high performance NFS server >> >> FreeBSD nfs2 5.3-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #1: Tue Jan 4 >> 19:14:40 EST 2005 root@nfs2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS i386 >> >> Two CPUs (tried hyperthreading and not), 4 GB of memory >> >> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2400.10-MHz 686-class CPU) >> Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 >> >> Features=0xbfebfbff> ,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HT >> T,TM,PBE> >> Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs >> real memory = 4160225280 (3967 MB) >> avail memory = 4073271296 (3884 MB) >> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs >> cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 >> cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 6 >> >> The NFS exported filesystem is on a Q-Logic FC card >> >> isp0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem >> 0xf8300000-0xf8300fff irq 28 at device 3.0 on pci3 >> isp0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> >> The disk is formated UFS2 and is big, but not *that* big yet >> >> /dev/da1s1d 471860682 206516934 227594894 48% /usr/local/export >> >> Every 12 hours or so the system crashes with a hard lock and no >> error messages in /var/log/messages or on the screen. I've moved all >> the disks to a duplicate system. If it continues to lock hard what's >> the possibility the issue is SMP? > > > See this message from yesterday (submitted to announce): > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ERRATA/notices/FreeBSD-EN-05:01.nfs.asc > > In short, update your system. > > Cheers, Erik Since i am going to set up a SMP NFS server too, i would be interested if this really solves the OP's problem. After all, he is talking about a "hard lock with no messages..", as opposed to a "kernel panic", which in my understanding always produces messages. Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax : -3341 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:50:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB82616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:50:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com (imo-d04.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7532643D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:50:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id s.da.1c8aa060 (14374); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:50:21 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:50:20 EST To: tedm@toybox.placo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:50:45 -0000 In a message dated 1/6/05 1:44:54 AM Eastern Standard Time, tedm@toybox.placo.com writes: > > One system cost me 3 months salary in Russia. Is this how you > treat your users? Why can't your developer use the machine they > used to make 5.3 work? > > >YOU are not PAYING the FreeBSD developers to develop for your >particular SuperMicro motherboard. Teddy, Its the most prevalent and popolar chipset on the market, Ted. At least pretend to be somewhat competent at your trade. End uses shouldnt have to fund "organization" touting "free" OSs on mainstream chipsets. Its ridiculous that you don't support it. TM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:52:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8CC16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:52:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m14.mx.aol.com (imo-m14.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4113443D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:52:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m14.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id r.81.1e80ba69 (14374); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:52:27 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <81.1e80ba69.2f0eb8ba@aol.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:52:26 EST To: laszlof@vonostingroup.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:52:36 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 7:39:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, laszlof@vonostingroup.com writes: >Your point might have some teeth if the "newer" version were better, but >the entire problem is that 5.x is much worse than 4.x, so there lies the >issue. 4.10 is NOT supposed to be an "old" version. Its the production >version. Because its readily admitted that 5.x is not yet ready for >prime time by those in the know. And its not properly suppored. > > > >Thats strange, http://www.freebsd.org says 5.3 is the Production release >and 4.10 is the (legacy) production release I> guess they just dont teach you words like "legacy" in troll school. And why is that, when Robert Watson has outlined, on this list, why 5.x isnt ready yet? I find it amazing that not one person in this stupid customer base cares about that fact? Are you all a bunch of wireless college kids or something? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:54:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D820916A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:54:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A1B43D5C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:54:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from duanewinner@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [10.10.100.90] (unknown[216.113.237.29]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with ESMTP id <20050106155416113005oodpe> (Authid: duanewinner); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:54:16 +0000 Message-ID: <41DD5F25.3060101@att.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:54:13 -0500 From: Duane Winner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: xorg and xfree86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:54:24 -0000 Hi all, I was wondering if anybody could provide me with a brief explanation of why FreeBSD has made Xorg the default X11 implementation over XFree86. It doesn't really matter to me, I've tried it, it seems to work fine, and almost exactly the same. The only problem I've run into so far is is that my old XF86Config file with the refresh rates for my external monitor connected to my laptop didn't quite take (kept going to 800x600). After some minor fiddling, I managed to get it working (I still need to do it again a few times so I make sure I understand fully what I'm doing). I've read a bunch of docs, but can't seem to find an answer on why FreeBSD has moved to Xorg. Is it just a political/licensing issue? Like I said, it's not a big deal, but I manage the internal 'Howto' document for our organization, and since we're in the process of moving from 5.2.1 to 5.3, it would be nice to have a little mention of why we're going to Xorg after my entire section for installing X is going to change from Xfree86 instructions. Just curious. Cheers, DW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:57:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FB216A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:57:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B831043D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 36626 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 07:57:03 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 07:57:03 -0800 Message-ID: <41DD5FC1.5050802@taborandtashell.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:56:49 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J.D. Bronson" References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106080413.00c43fe8@cheyenne.wixb.com> In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106080413.00c43fe8@cheyenne.wixb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 - starting a process as a diff user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:57:11 -0000 J.D. Bronson wrote: > I have a daemon that I need to start at boot under > /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > and I need it to run as a specific user. > > Currently, from root, I su - {userid} and then launch it > and then log out. > > Can I make this automated in /usr/local/etc/rc.d and if so how? This is what I have in one line of my rc.local: su -m [user] -c '[command]' but check the man page first. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:58:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC5A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:58:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32E743D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j06FwTq21851; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:58:29 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200501061558.j06FwTq21851@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: bennett@cs.niu.edu (Scott Bennett) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:58:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200501061145.j06BjiBZ025943@mp.cs.niu.edu> from "Scott Bennett" at Jan 06, 2005 05:45:44 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: flowers@users.sourceforge.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:58:51 -0000 > > On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:10 -0700 Danny MacMillan > wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:35:43PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: > >> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 Danny MacMillan > >> wrote: > >> > >> >This is not intuitive, but you do not want to use the "make a > >> >bootable CD" function of Sonic RecordNow! to make a bootable CD. > >> > >> On what basis is the above statement made if you haven't used > >> Sonic RecordNow! ? It certainly looks to me as though the green > >> button is the *only* way to burn an image (not counting making an > >> exact copy of > > > >On the basis of your characterizing the little green button as being > >"for making a bootable CD", and my understanding of that function in > >alternative software. In short: I misunderstood. I apologize for > >the misdirection. > > > Oh. That was because, if one places the cursor over the green > button, a box appears temporarily bearing a line that says, "Click > here to make this CD/DVD bootable". And, as noted in a different > posting in this thread, that button brings up a browser panel for > choosing an image file (but not displaying .iso files among the > choices) to burn in making the bootable disk. Just an additional note for clarity: If I understand - and I don't have the rest of the thread so I may be missing something - you want to make a bootable CD of one of the ISO images. In that case, you do NOT want to use any of the options on your local machine to create a bootable CD because the ISO image is already a bootable image. It needs merely to be written raw to the media. When your utility asks if you want to create a bootable CD, it is asking if you want it to add a boot record for it and the other pointers to the file to make it bootable. Since the FreeeBSD ISO already has that stuff in it, you don't want it done again. So, choose the options that just write the data image directly to the CD with no additions. ////jerry > > > Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG > ********************************************************************** > * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * > *--------------------------------------------------------------------* > * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * > * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * > * -- a standing army." * > * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * > ********************************************************************** > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:58:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C1C16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:58:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from px2.gov.za (mx2.gov.za [163.195.128.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8176B43D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:58:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hendrik.Kluever@sita.co.za) Received: from [10.135.220.206] (helo=mailman.sita.co.za) by px2.gov.za with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmYJ9-0004nb-DM for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:08:11 +0200 Received: by mailman.sita.co.za with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:59:21 +0200 Message-ID: <6C6C4097FCF3D511AD3E001083FA234C35A83A27@mailman.sita.co.za> From: Hendrik.Kluever@sita.co.za To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:59:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Ports for FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:58:53 -0000 Hi I would just like to enquire what's wrong with the ports for FreeBSD 5.2.1 I want to install ported applications for 5.2.1 and then I get a message that says ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ 5.2.1-RELEASE does not exist Regards Hendrik Kluever Tel: +27 12 336-0610 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 15:59:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF2316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:59:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d23.mx.aol.com (imo-d23.mx.aol.com [205.188.139.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E9B43D5D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:59:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-d23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id g.149.3c47467a (14374); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:59:07 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <149.3c47467a.2f0eba4b@aol.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:59:07 EST To: kris@obsecurity.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:59:18 -0000 In a message dated 1/5/05 7:25:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, kris@obsecurity.org writes: > In a message dated 1/5/05 7:16:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, > kris@obsecurity.org writes: > > Why are you here? > > > > I wish I could be as arrogant and condescending as you, but clearly you > > were born with an advantage in that are > > He has a Holy Mission. > Yes, a mission to get the FreeBSD team to support 4.10 until they can get > 5.x working properly. Whats not reasonable about that? >That you think "being an unbearable asshole" is an appropriate way to >go about it. > >Kris Well apparaently if someone asks nicely you ask them to donate their hardware. Why don't you answer the question, as to why the newest intel chipsets are not supported by 4.x, instead of bashing me? You dont have any answers. You guys couldnt even sweep up after the original FreeBSD team. What a travesty. And apparently there aren't any technically capable people using FreeBSD anymore, because they all seem very happy with an O/S that is substantially slower than it was before. What a waste. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:00:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD85C16A4D4 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:00:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2392A43D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:00:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 36662 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 08:00:48 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 08:00:48 -0800 Message-ID: <41DD60A2.6020805@taborandtashell.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:00:34 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106080413.00c43fe8@cheyenne.wixb.com> <41DD5FC1.5050802@taborandtashell.net> In-Reply-To: <41DD5FC1.5050802@taborandtashell.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 5.3 - starting a process as a diff user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:00:55 -0000 J.D. Bronson. Your mail server is blocking my mail server: : 65.43.82.170 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 : Client host rejected: Connecting IP appears dynamic - Use ISP to relay email Giving up on 65.43.82.170. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:07:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E2D16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:07:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D4D43D5D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:07:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3385389794; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:07:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:07:18 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: gerard-seibert@rcn.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050106052050.9236.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> References: <20050106052050.9236.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Configuring POSTFIX to use mutiple email accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:07:19 -0000 --On Thursday, January 06, 2005 05:25:12 AM -0500 Gerard Seibert wrote: > I am trying to solicit some information on how to configure 'postfix' > to accommodate multiple IP addresses. > > I have several email accounts. I use them for newsgroups, forums, etc. > Most of the accounts use different 'SMTP' and 'POP' settings. However, > in two cases, they use the same 'SMTP' and 'POP' addresses. I have not > been able to find any definitive information on how to configure > 'postfix' to handle this. I would appreciate it if someone could either > direct me to a source of information that might prove useful, or provide > me with some first hand knowledge of how this is accomplished. > This question makes no sense. Postfix is an MTA. It doesn't have anything to do with how mail is read. What exactly is it that you're trying to do? Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:07:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146AB16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:07:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D6F43D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:07:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkinkade@fastmail.fm) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B38C4A442; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:07:52 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: eEaDNd2xXsHEv9d+Yb0qkA 1105027672 Received: from gentoo-npk.bmp.ub (unknown [206.27.244.136]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274392553F; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:07:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from nkinkade by gentoo-npk.bmp.ub with local (Exim 4.21) id 1CmaAv-0002h7-G9; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:07:49 -0600 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:07:49 -0600 From: Nathan Kinkade To: "J.D. Bronson" Message-ID: <20050106160749.GE3639@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub> Mail-Followup-To: "J.D. Bronson" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106080413.00c43fe8@cheyenne.wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DRp5/Sds4nAqvQzf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106080413.00c43fe8@cheyenne.wixb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 - starting a process as a diff user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:07:55 -0000 --DRp5/Sds4nAqvQzf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:05:41AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I have a daemon that I need to start at boot under > /usr/local/etc/rc.d >=20 > and I need it to run as a specific user. >=20 > Currently, from root, I su - {userid} and then launch it > and then log out. >=20 > Can I make this automated in /usr/local/etc/rc.d and if so how? >=20 > Thanks :) >=20 > -JEFF You can use su(1) to do this, too. Look into the -c option. So, someting in your script like: su someuser -c "/usr/bin/someprogram" =2E.. should do what you need. Nathan --DRp5/Sds4nAqvQzf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB3WJVO0ZIEthSfkkRApdAAKCJvVIgnasbuaJEy2oVozSoyWhm+QCfV7lF 7TcpShSMD0zBNQvyWEqZwRs= =BKiz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DRp5/Sds4nAqvQzf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:10:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB7D16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:10:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m22.mx.aol.com (imo-m22.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5018843D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:10:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id f.13c.a0c43e8 (14374); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:10:23 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <13c.a0c43e8.2f0ebcef@aol.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:10:23 EST To: dave@horsfall.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: tedm@toybox.placo.com cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Freebsd 5.3 Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:10:53 -0000 In a message dated 1/6/05 4:51:10 AM Eastern Standard Time, dave@horsfall.org writes: > 4.10 *is* supported, and 5.3 works "as advertised" - what the hell is your > *problem* exactly??? Its been well documented that 5.3 does NOT work as advertised, and the newest intel chipsets (not that new) don't work in 4.10, redering is useless with the newer intel processors. To quote Robert watson of the Freebsd core team who posted to this list on Nov 11, 2004: " FreeBSD 5.3 sees an observably higher per-packet processing costs than the 4.x branch due to in-progress changes to the synchronization and queueing models. Specifically, the SMPng work has changed the interrupt and synchronization models throughout the kernel in order to increase concurrency and preemptibility (i.e., lower latency in interrupt-based processing). However, this has increaseed the overall overhead of synchronization on the stack. The network stack forwarding path is particularly sensitive to this, so while other parts of the system see immediate concurrency benefits (i.e., socket-centric web servers that now see less contention on SMP, and more preemption on UP), this path still runs slower for many workloads. We're actively working to remedy this, and you will see changes merged to the 6.x and 5.x branches over the next couple of months that will cut into the numbers you see above by quite a bit. Off the top of my head, I would have expected to see more around a 15% overhead on UP for the workload you're seeing, but as you point out, results can and do vary." 5.3 is not ready for production. 4.10 should be fully supported until it is. TM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:17:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9D216A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:17:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654D043D5C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:17:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20AC2389494; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:17:05 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:17:05 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: gerard-seibert@rcn.com, Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <37B3AF603F27850132236332@utd49554.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050106065102.7B36.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> References: <20050106052050.9236.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> <20050106065102.7B36.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: Configuring POSTFIX to use mutiple email accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:17:05 -0000 --On Thursday, January 06, 2005 06:57:15 AM -0500 Gerard Seibert wrote: > > Therefore, if I have several email addresses that are through different > ISP's, don't I have to configure POSTFIX fir each of them? > No. You're confusing *reading* mail with *sending* mail. All Postfix does is send and receive mail. It has nothing to do with how you read your mail and there's nothing to configure with regard to how your ISP handles mail. What you do is configure Postfix so that it can send mail for you (and receive if that's possible, but you'd need a domain name for that.) Then you configure your email client (MUA) (Evolution, mutt, pine, mulberry, whatever) to get mail for each account by entering in to the POP or IMAP *incoming* server the name of the server that you fetch that mail from. When you configure the SMTP *outgoing* server, you configure it to go to Postfix (whatever you named it) and *it* will send the mail to whereever you told it to. If your ISP restricts port 25 so that you can't send mail directly, then configure Postfix to send all mail to your ISP's mail server. If you can provide *specific* information about each account (incoming and outgoing servers, *not* your username and password) and your ISP's server names as well as their policy about sending mail directly from your machine, then we can probably give you specific advise regarding the settings you need to have in Postfix. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:41:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8E216A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:41:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D952D43D5C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:41:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [10.10.100.90] (unknown[216.113.237.29]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005010616411311200mhqtke> (Authid: duanewinner); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:41:13 +0000 Message-ID: <41DD6A28.10306@att.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:41:12 -0500 From: Duane Winner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian McCann References: <2b5f066d05010405413cf48f99@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2b5f066d05010405413cf48f99@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD mailinglist Subject: Re: SSH & 5.3 Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:41:21 -0000 Brian McCann wrote: >Hi all. On 5.3 and 5.3 RC1 I have this problem where when I ssh in >using either a FreeBSD 4.3 box or an older PuTTY client (0.52 is one I >experienced it with), I cannot connect. On PuTTY, it asks for a >username, then just exits. On FreeBSD when I put the ssh client into >verbose, it appears it can't agree on an auth method, even though both >are set to accept and attempt keyboard-interactive. Upgrading to a >newer PuTTY fixed the problem, and it seams to work from FreeBSD 4.10. > I've seen some posts from people that upgrading their PuTTY fixed the >problem, but I'm curious if anyone knows the cause of the problem, and >possibly how to fix it, on the server end. > >Thanks, >--Brian McCann >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > For what it's worth, we happen to have some licensed copies of the commercial SSH client (from SSH Communications Inc.) for our Windows boxes. I just tried to reproduce this problem. To ssh into *nix workstations, I've always just used password authentication. On the commercial windows client, after you specify the hostname and username, you pick from a drop-down list Authentication Method: -Password -Public Key -SecureID -PAM -Keyboard Interactive I have ALWAYS just used password to get into my Linux and FreeBSD workstations running sshd. But password no longer works. I started to get nervous, but relaxed when I found out that if I selected "Keyboard Interactive", I could get in. I don't understand what exacactly "keyboard interactive" is and how it differs from "password", but it seems to work. I haven't used PuTTY in a few years, and I don't know if this is something that can be tweaked or not. Cheers, DW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:42:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8D616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:42:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.altobox.cz (mail.altobox.cz [80.188.59.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4278243D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas_k@cbox.cz) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (kebert.altobox.cz [80.188.59.132]) by mail.altobox.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j06Hg2TU001465 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:42:03 +0100 Message-ID: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:42:12 +0100 From: "K.T." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: cs, en-us, en To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "xxx."@cbox.cz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:42:17 -0000 I think, BSD is one with lot of unusable, needless systems. You never get over Windows or Linux. FreeBSD is stupid system, which only nobody will use. :-( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:46:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4461016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:46:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A2343D54 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nocmonkey@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so46979rna for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:46:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=pX5flFrp2Jynmj11yHWqV4zmpn7dGfiLPju581is3Z3g92Pzk/xC7/LWyPVvB2wj56Wjhk5g/PXjv65SOMEwD10/Ggpy+nwpcKMf7KNW1872Id/LNNMp2zw127HbQ2g2EZPg0hVzskZsIJsQlLBrUyzM2beJK6/be4VAZyvookc= Received: by 10.38.22.43 with SMTP id 43mr141046rnv; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 08:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.22.52 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:46:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:46:30 -0500 From: Danny To: thomas_k@cbox.cz In-Reply-To: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Danny List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:46:31 -0000 On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:42:12 +0100, K.T. wrote: > > I think, BSD is one with lot of unusable, needless systems. I think you don't know what your talking about. > You never get over Windows or Linux. > FreeBSD is stupid system, which only nobody will use. :-( Prove it. ...D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:48:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8060516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:48:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A0143D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from FreeBSD@amadeus.demon.nl) Received: from amadeus.demon.nl ([82.161.18.200]:64676 helo=[10.0.1.1]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cmaof-000CCC-T6; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:48:54 +0000 In-Reply-To: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: FreeBSD questions mailing list Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:48:51 +0100 To: "xxx."@cbox.cz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:48:55 -0000 On 06 jan 2005, at 17:42, K.T. wrote: > > I think, BSD is one with lot of unusable, needless systems. > You never get over Windows or Linux. > FreeBSD is stupid system, which only nobody will use. :-( > And your question is? Arno From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:50:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D4C16A4D0 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:50:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.martymac.com (martymac.com [82.224.94.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FBB43D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:50:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganael.laplanche@martymac.com) Received: from martymac.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.martymac.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4277DFC for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:50:05 +0100 (CET) From: "Ganael Laplanche" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:50:05 +0000 Message-Id: <20050106164506.M14496@martymac.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 62.4.23.8 (martymac) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Asus K8N-E and slow disk transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:50:30 -0000 [This is a repost from the amd64 list] Hi all, I've just bought an ASUS K8N-E mobo. I'm using FreeBSD-5.3-Stable (amd64) and suffering from *very* slow disk transfer rates. The chipset is an nforce3 and is correctly detected at boot : # dmesg [...] atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 8.0 on pci 0 [...] My disk is an UDMA100 one, everything seems to be correct : # atacontrol mode 0 Master = UDMA100 Slave = BIOSPIO # sysctl -a [...] hw.ata.atapi_dma: 1 hw.ata.ata_dma: 1 [...] I use a new 80 lead ATA cable (shipped with my mobo)... Evrything should be okay, but the whole system is very very slow. Copying a 600 MB takes about 10 minutes (1 MB/sec) and makes the system nearly unusable during the copy. Do you have any idea ? Ganaël LAPLANCHE ganael.laplanche@martymac.com http://www.martymac.com Tel : (+33)6.84.03.57.24. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 16:55:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE9F16A4DA for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:55:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out012.verizon.net (out012pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526B543D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:55:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from FreeBSD@keyslapper.org) Received: from keyslapper.org ([68.163.251.221]) by out012.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050106165511.UNCJ10436.out012.verizon.net@keyslapper.org>; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:55:11 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D685111B41; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:55:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from keyslapper.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keyslapper.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38241-08; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:55:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by keyslapper.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4CB3F116CC; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:55:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:55:10 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc To: thomas_k@cbox.cz Message-ID: <20050106165510.GG7017@keyslapper.org> Mail-Followup-To: thomas_k@cbox.cz, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keyslapper.org X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out012.verizon.net from [68.163.251.221] at Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:55:11 -0600 cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:55:15 -0000 On 01/06/05 05:42 PM, K.T. sat at the `puter and typed: > > I think, BSD is one with lot of unusable, needless systems. > You never get over Windows or Linux. > FreeBSD is stupid system, which only nobody will use. :-( Now that is by far the stupidest post I've seen in a good long time. Can you say TROLL? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:02:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580C416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from amber.aeternal.net (amber.in.markiza.sk [62.168.76.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9AC43D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:01:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corwin@pleiades.aeternal.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B11B848 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:05:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from amber.aeternal.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (amber.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69220-09 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:05:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from pleiades.aeternal.net (pleiades.markiza.sk [192.168.0.7]) by amber.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB3DB818 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:05:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from pleiades.aeternal.net (localhost.aeternal.net [127.0.0.1]) by pleiades.aeternal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464047E824 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:02:05 +0100 (CET) Received: (from corwin@localhost) by pleiades.aeternal.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j06H24Gw030142 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:02:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from corwin) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:02:04 +0100 From: martin hudec To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050106170204.GB28329@pleiades.aeternal.net> References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> <20050106165510.GG7017@keyslapper.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="B4IIlcmfBL/1gGOG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050106165510.GG7017@keyslapper.org> X-Copyright: (C) 2004 Martin Hudec X-Operating-System: FreeBSD pleiades.aeternal.net 6.0-CURRENT i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.aeternal.net/corwin_aeternal.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at aeternal.net Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: martin hudec List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:02:00 -0000 --B4IIlcmfBL/1gGOG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:55:10AM -0500 or thereabouts, Louis LeBlanc wrot= e: >=20 > Now that is by far the stupidest post I've seen in a good long time. >=20 If that is so, then why do you waste your time by responding to it? Such posts are better left ignored. :) Cheers, Martin --=20 martin hudec * 421 907 303 393 * corwin@aeternal.net * http://www.aeternal.net "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible=20 exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" --B4IIlcmfBL/1gGOG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3W8MZYEZIv+rgggRAh6/AKCUpAtYTvXRK7WLwybxlluD/xjhPACfaFfb RbNtvEfaxLTrvZ4RkaxhDhw= =ccV0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --B4IIlcmfBL/1gGOG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:23:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E778316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:23:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614C543D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:23:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 36807 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 09:23:00 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 09:23:00 -0800 Message-ID: <41DD73E6.5010200@taborandtashell.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:22:46 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> In-Reply-To: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:23:08 -0000 K.T. wrote: > I think, BSD is one with lot of unusable, needless systems. > You never get over Windows or Linux. > FreeBSD is stupid system, which only nobody will use. :-( It's like Dave Horsfall wrote: _____________________ /| /| | | | ||__|| | | Please do not | / O O\__ | feed the | / \ | Trolls | / \ \|_____________________| / _ \ \ || / |\____\ \ || / | | | |\____/ || / \|_|_|/ | _|| / / \ |____| || / | | | --| | | | |____ --| * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/ *-- _--\ _ \ | || / _ \\ | / ` * / \_ /- | | | * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________ -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:26:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0220116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:26:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFC943D39 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:26:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd5mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.182]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9W002S4OG5A4D0@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:26:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml9so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.7]) by pd5mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9W0058DOG5VA90@pd5mr6so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:26:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from procyon.nekulturny.org (S0106000c41b2b9a3.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.45.143]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I9W00I48OG59B@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:26:29 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:26:28 -0700 From: Danny MacMillan In-reply-to: <20050106090113.GB20461@mccme.ru> To: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" Message-id: <20050106172628.GA776@procyon.nekulturny.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <20050105202329.GA30133@mccme.ru> <19861fba0501051514873eea3@mail.gmail.com> <20050106090113.GB20461@mccme.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: J65nko BSD cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail and mbox permissions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:26:30 -0000 On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:01:13PM +0300, Eugene M. Minkovskii wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:14:05AM +0100, J65nko BSD wrote: > " On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:23:29 +0300, Eugene M. Minkovskii wrote: > " > Hi. > " > > " > I use FreeBSD 5.3 and sendmail. When root rechieve the mail, > " > mailbox's (/var/mail/root) permission bits has been setted to > " > 600. Who and how it does? Can I change this behavior? > " > > " > -- > " For security reasons, the "root" account should not receice any mail. > " One of sendmail's alternatives "qmail" will even NEVER send any mail > " to the root account. > " > " Enter an alias for root in "/etc/mail/aliases" and run the "newaliases" command. > > Yes, I know this reasons, but I want to know what happens. Who > change permissions on /var/mail/root. Why I see it in FreeBSD 5.3 > and don't see in FreeBSD 5.2.1? > > What do you mean "don't rechive any mail?" mach daemond, mail to > root they reports and I want easy way to reading it. Mail for root can be delivered to any account you choose. It doesn't have to be delivered to the root account. J65nko BSD suggested that you create an alias; this would allow root's email to be delivered to your account. It doesn't get much easier than that. I can't answer the rest of your questions. > -- > Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii I'm not sure about this, but I suspect you probably mean to say "Sincerely yours" rather than "Sensory yours". The former is a common complimentary close. The latter is ... strange :) -- Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:31:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD5916A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:31:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AA643D2D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:31:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [10.10.100.90] (unknown[216.113.237.29]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005010617311911100j84a4e> (Authid: duanewinner); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:31:20 +0000 Message-ID: <41DD75E6.1020802@att.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:31:18 -0500 From: Duane Winner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "xxx."@cbox.cz References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> In-Reply-To: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:31:30 -0000 K.T. wrote: > I think, BSD is one with lot of unusable, needless systems. > You never get over Windows or Linux. > FreeBSD is stupid system, which only nobody will use. :-( > > Hey Butthead, heh,heh, I heard that they, uh, like put plutonium in bowling balls. No way, Beavis, that's golf balls you're thinking of. They put people's heads in bowling balls, dumbass. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:32:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6F716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:32:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890FB43D2D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:32:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j06HWALX012361; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:32:10 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: Ludwig Mey In-Reply-To: References: <1105021643.708.51.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:32:10 +0000 Message-Id: <1105032730.708.81.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:32:06 -0000 On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:11 +0200, Ludwig Mey wrote: [top post moved down so the mail reads coherently. CC'd to list in case anyone else has this problem in the future and tries googling for it] > On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:27:23 +0000, Peter Risdon > wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 16:13 +0200, Ludwig Mey wrote: > > > hi > > > > > > my problem is as follows. > > > > > > i am trying to connect a Prolific Technology USB to serial connecter. > > > but i am unable to get anything right after that. i have tried using > > > minicom and pointing it to where the system is telling the device is. > > > but no luck. any help will be appreciated. > > > > > > i am running FreeBSD 5.3 > > > > > > and the following information is given to me by the system when the > > > device is plugged in. > > > > > > Jan 6 16:07:26 gogga kernel: ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. > > > USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 > > > > I think you might need to compile a custom kernel with the added line: > > > > device ucom > > > > Then you should see something like: > > > > Jan 6 14:26:17 lorna kernel: ucom0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial > > Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 > > > > when you plug it in. > > thx so far, but it didn't work. i added "device ucom" to my > kernel,and recompiled but i still get the same response when attaching > the device > > > Jan 6 19:07:36 gogga kernel: ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. > USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 > > anything else that i could possibly try? Well, I've got the exact same cable and it's detected properly on my machine with this device in the kernel, as you can see from my earlier post. Here's the full usb section from my kernel configuration file: # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices device ugen # Generic device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player device uscanner # Scanners device ucom device uplcom I don't think you ought to require uplcom, but maybe it's worth a try. I have no idea how experienced a user you are, so apologise if this is trying to teach you to suck eggs: are you sure you compiled your custom kernel properly? I'm surprised the device isn't picked up correctly if the ucom device is present in your kernel. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:33:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725D716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:33:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136BD43D2D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:33:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j06HUFGg092935; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:30:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DD765C.7030005@vilot.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:33:16 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Schuele References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> <41DC21DF.30801@computer.org> <41DC8FF5.9040001@vilot.com> <41DCD136.1080201@computer.org> In-Reply-To: <41DCD136.1080201@computer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:33:59 -0000 Eric Schuele wrote: > I purchased mine from: > http://www.pcdgloabl.com > Which as luck would have it is within a mile of my office. So I just > drove over there. > Terrific. 1. Mis-type of the url: it is actually http://www.pcdglobal.com :) 2. Which model do you have? The Mini-PCI 802.11b/g AR5004? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:41:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EBD16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:41:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C3743D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:41:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F692389212; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:41:01 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:41:01 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: Noah , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <40033FFE9D9605012D2DB106@utd49554.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050105010629.M47182@enabled.com> References: <20050104190642.M26516@enabled.com> <20050105010629.M47182@enabled.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: syslog.conf help directing ctl_cyrusdb output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:41:02 -0000 --On Tuesday, January 04, 2005 05:08:03 PM -0800 Noah wrote: > > You know I saw this recommendation in the installation configuration and > added it to my syslog.conf file and then restarted syslogd. but the > cyrus log messages still end up in /var/log/messages > > any clues on this? > None. I was hoping it worked for you. It did not work for me. :-( I use logsentry (look for Sentry Tools on Sourceforge) to report log info daily, and it allows me to filter out stuff like that. In a previous installation, using local6 to feed to /var/log/imapd.log worked fine. I don't know why it doesn't work in the present install, but I don't have time to figure out why either. (FreeBSD 4.9 SECURITY, running cyrus-imapd 2.1.16 and cyrus-sasl 2.1.20) Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:42:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AA716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:42:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.altobox.cz (mail.altobox.cz [80.188.59.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AAC143D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:42:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas_k@cbox.cz) Received: from Tom (kebert.altobox.cz [80.188.59.132]) by mail.altobox.cz (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id j06Ig5TU001874 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:42:06 +0100 Message-ID: <000601c4f417$1051adb0$0a01a8c0@Tom> From: "K.T." To: References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> <20050106165510.GG7017@keyslapper.org> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:42:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "K.T." List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:42:19 -0000 No, i can´t say TROLL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Louis LeBlanc" To: Cc: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 5:55 PM Subject: Re: Free BSD > On 01/06/05 05:42 PM, K.T. sat at the `puter and typed: >> >> I think, BSD is one with lot of unusable, needless systems. >> You never get over Windows or Linux. >> FreeBSD is stupid system, which only nobody will use. :-( > > Now that is by far the stupidest post I've seen in a good long time. > > Can you say TROLL? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 17:55:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECF116A4D3 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:55:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail5.speakeasy.net (mail5.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1589A43D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:55:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 12641 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 17:55:07 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Jan 2005 17:55:07 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id EA5A869; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:55:06 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Duane Winner References: <2b5f066d05010405413cf48f99@mail.gmail.com> <41DD6A28.10306@att.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 06 Jan 2005 12:55:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <41DD6A28.10306@att.net> Message-ID: <447jmqqw79.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Brian McCann cc: FreeBSD mailinglist Subject: Re: SSH & 5.3 Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:55:08 -0000 Duane Winner writes: > I don't understand what exacactly "keyboard interactive" is and how it > differs from "password", but it seems to work. The latter doesn't go through PAM. > I haven't used PuTTY in a few years, and I don't know if this is > something that can be tweaked or not. Recent versions certainly can do keyboard-interactive. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:04:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7753416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:04:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F7143D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:04:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FE64394; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:05:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30065-04; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:05:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FBC421B; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:05:16 +0100 (CET) From: "Jorn Argelo" To: "Ganael Laplanche" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:05:16 +0100 Message-Id: <20050106180304.M82599@wcborstel.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050106164506.M14496@martymac.com> References: <20050106164506.M14496@martymac.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 82.161.134.53 (jorn) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.wcborstel.nl Subject: Re: Asus K8N-E and slow disk transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:04:42 -0000 On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:50:05 +0000, Ganael Laplanche wrote > [This is a repost from the amd64 list] > > Hi all, > > I've just bought an ASUS K8N-E mobo. I'm using FreeBSD-5.3-Stable > (amd64) and suffering from *very* slow disk transfer rates. The > chipset is an nforce3 and is correctly detected at boot : > > # dmesg > [...] > atapci0: port > 0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 8.0 on > pci 0 [...] > > My disk is an UDMA100 one, everything seems to be correct : > # atacontrol mode 0 > Master = UDMA100 > Slave = BIOSPIO Are you sure that the BIOS is using the correct PIO mode? You can try setting it yourself though. However, I don't have too much experience with that. I do know that the incorrect PIO mode can make your PC extremely slow. Jorn > > # sysctl -a > [...] > hw.ata.atapi_dma: 1 > hw.ata.ata_dma: 1 > [...] > > I use a new 80 lead ATA cable (shipped with my mobo)... Evrything > should be okay, but the whole system is very very slow. Copying a > 600 MB takes about 10 minutes (1 MB/sec) and makes the system nearly > unusable during the copy. > > Do you have any idea ? > > Ganaël LAPLANCHE > ganael.laplanche@martymac.com > http://www.martymac.com > Tel : (+33)6.84.03.57.24. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:16:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CB416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:16:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sheffield.cnchost.com (sheffield.concentric.net [207.155.252.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E8B43D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:16:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dale@satoriseal.com) Received: from dale (bdsl.66.13.185.210.gte.net [66.13.185.210]) by sheffield.cnchost.com id NAA24406; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:16:38 -0500 (EST) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: From: "Satori Seal - Dale T. McGrosky" To: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:19:25 -0800 Organization: Satori Seal Corporation Message-ID: <001701c4f41c$41429240$13a8a8c0@satoriseal.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: BASIC WEB SERVER HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dale@satoriseal.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:16:39 -0000 06Jan05 Hello, I am setting up a web server to handle an interactive web site were my customers can check inventory, prices, etc. The number of users will be less than 500. The computer is Intel based server class computer with 2 700 MHz CPU's and 2 gigabytes of ram. The web server program will be PARADOX as this computer will access data through a Sonic wall firewall to our file server. Will FreeBSD 5.3 be a good operating system for us that will provide excellent security? Any suggestions? Thank you in advance for your assistance Best regards, Dale T. McGrosky Satori Seal Corporation 8455 Utica Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3809 909-987-8234, fax: 909-945-3005 dale@satoriseal.com Visit our web site at www.satoriseal.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:19:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B9E16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:19:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EC043D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:19:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd2mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr5so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.8]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9W001KEQVX3C60@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:19:09 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml9so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.7]) by pd2mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9W00K3VQVXOEB0@pd2mr5so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:19:09 -0700 (MST) Received: from procyon.nekulturny.org (S0106000c41b2b9a3.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.45.143]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I9W00L6BQVXXK@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:19:09 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:19:09 -0700 From: Danny MacMillan In-reply-to: <20050106065102.7B36.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> To: Gerard Seibert Message-id: <20050106181909.GB776@procyon.nekulturny.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <20050106052050.9236.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> <41DD1869.6030502@mac.com> <20050106065102.7B36.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Configuring POSTFIX to use mutiple email accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:19:10 -0000 On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:57:15AM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Thursday, January 06, 2005 5:52:25 AM Chuck Swiger wrote: > |>Gerard Seibert wrote: > |>> > |>> [snip] > |>> > |>> I have several email accounts. I use them for newsgroups, forums, etc. > |>> Most of the accounts use different 'SMTP' and 'POP' settings. However, > |>> in two cases, they use the same 'SMTP' and 'POP' addresses. I have not > |>> been able to find any definitive information on how to configure > |>> 'postfix' to handle this. > |> > |>Postfix is an MTA, it doesn't have anything to do with POP. > |>That's up to a mail client (MUA) like Mozilla or pine. > > OK, I got this information from this URL: > http://www.ofb.biz/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=326 > > [snip] > > Therefore, if I have several email addresses that are through different > ISP's, don't I have to configure POSTFIX fir each of them? As others have replied, you usually do not need to do this. The only exception I can think of is the one I ran into: If you use a third- party email service provider (like mail.com, or maybe even your own company's servers) and they have SPF records in place, you do need to route outgoing mail for those accounts through the third party's servers. If you don't, your mail will probably be marked as spam. If you use a comprehensive mail client, you can usually specify in the client which SMTP servers to use for which accounts. Postfix doesn't enter the picture in that case. If you use a mail client that insists on sending mail through the local MTA (e.g. Postfix), like Mutt does, you have to perform some hoop-jumpery. /usr/ports/mail/esmtp will get this to work; there may be others. It routes mail to different SMTP servers based on the envelope From address. There may be other solutions, e.g. patches to one or another MTA to allow it to perform this discriminatory routing, but I'm not aware of any (although I know qmail has a patch to allow it to perform SMTP authorization when required). -- Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:24:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACC316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:24:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B4343D53 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:24:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([82.161.136.218]:9931 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmcIt-000MFC-IN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:24:11 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BFF1A9A7 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:24:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.111] (82-197-198-30.dsl.cambrium.nl [82.197.198.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D67173701E for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:24:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DD8242.8090207@scii.nl> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:24:02 +0100 From: albi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050106142257.GA30323@math.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050106142257.GA30323@math.jussieu.fr> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Create tgz packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:24:15 -0000 Albert Shih wrote: > Suppose I have two computer, one very fast and one very slow, I want > compile some application (with ports) on the fast and put in slow computer. > But I can not use some tar or rsync (hard to explain why but trust me I can) > > I want to create a tgz file and transfert it to slow computer to > install. How can I do that or where can I find some documentation for that. example : cd /usr/ports/audio/aumix make package copy /usr/ports/audio/aumix/aumix-gtk-2.8_2.tbz to your slower machine and use pkg_add on it From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:27:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3DC16A4CF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:27:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A26243D54 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:27:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j06IOSs0097113; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:24:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DD8311.9080803@vilot.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:27:29 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Duane Winner References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> <41DD75E6.1020802@att.net> In-Reply-To: <41DD75E6.1020802@att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:27:31 -0000 Duane Winner wrote: > No way, Beavis, that's golf balls you're thinking of. They put > people's heads in bowling balls, dumbass. Beavis! Your balls are filthy. Too the ball washer .... *now* ..... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:29:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2886516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:29:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from epicentre.ru (epicentre.ru [195.206.50.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C9443D5C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:29:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrachik@epicentre.ru) Received: from 195.46.120.230 (230.120.dial.irtel.ru [195.46.120.230] (may be forged)) by epicentre.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j06FZ8WB051378 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:35:09 +1100 (MAGT) (envelope-from mrachik@epicentre.ru) From: Dmitry Sytirin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:28:22 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501070228.23025.mrachik@epicentre.ru> Subject: Re: Can'tping between FreeBSD and Win2K... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mrachik@epicentre.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:29:08 -0000 On Thursday 06 January 2005 18:24, k o u b wrote: > IPFW is initialized without any setup in the rc.conf file??? I > was used the mini-install... it's automaticaly enable after > installation?? > > > TIA Mrachik. > > > koub. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Automaticaly after installation? No, need rebuild kernel with option IPFIREWALL... Give output of command: # ipfw show From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:37:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C4016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:37:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641E843D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:37:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j06IYQWE098025; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:34:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DD8567.3030308@vilot.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:37:27 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tm4528@aol.com References: <13c.a0c43e8.2f0ebcef@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <13c.a0c43e8.2f0ebcef@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: tedm@toybox.placo.com cc: dave@horsfall.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.3 Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:37:34 -0000 Tm4528@aol.com wrote: << snippage >> ***yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn*** Please don't feed the trolls. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:39:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD0416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:39:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9517843D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:39:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so84969wri for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:39:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=JTIQ5uD576SY6Dvg8XRXULu9eC8uPsF5ZOGfNZPz8dwR40484kymT3iflVmAaTnvDjrV/og7sdXBcFwbV+APimBrfD0AxgfzgHTKpZkYzmT1rXhSCeAVveLC3O+Ter+uyR7T2wTRw5vqDCVU0a19l4a/wPH7KBLl6wCLSTZR51E= Received: by 10.54.8.35 with SMTP id 35mr82267wrh; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:39:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:39:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:39:47 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Tom Vilot In-Reply-To: <41DD8311.9080803@vilot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> <41DD75E6.1020802@att.net> <41DD8311.9080803@vilot.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Duane Winner Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:39:48 -0000 On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:27:29 -0700, Tom Vilot wrote: > Duane Winner wrote: > > > No way, Beavis, that's golf balls you're thinking of. They put > > people's heads in bowling balls, dumbass. > > > Beavis! Your balls are filthy. Too the ball washer .... *now* ..... But you just keep on responding.... :( -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:47:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A7816A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:47:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D36043D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:47:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j06IiMcP099008; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:44:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DD87BB.9000607@vilot.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:47:23 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joshua Lokken References: <41DD6A64.7030002@cbox.cz> <41DD75E6.1020802@att.net> <41DD8311.9080803@vilot.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Duane Winner Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:47:25 -0000 Joshua Lokken wrote: >But you just keep on responding.... :( > Ah, but I was not responding to the troll. :c) I was responding to Duane. 'tis one of my favorite B&B lines .. That and ... "Liar! Liar! Pants on.... whoa..." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 18:53:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE0C16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:53:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com (imo-d04.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D869043D5E for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:53:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id s.1f0.32a8aa14 (3964); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:53:39 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <1f0.32a8aa14.2f0ee332@aol.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:53:38 EST To: tedm@toybox.placo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:53:52 -0000 In a message dated 1/6/05 2:10:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, tedm@toybox.placo.com writes: >> Do you really have no contacts at SM or Dell? What kind of a development >> org has no contacts with major vendors? > >It's not a question of not having contacts. It's a question of >actually defining the problem in a way that a developer can get >a fix on it. > >Currently, this is done with the PR mechanism on FreeBSD.org. Doing >a search of this shows only PR i386/72579, which claims FreeBSD 4.X >doesen't work at all on this chipset, which is contrary to what the >OP was saying. Thats NOT contrary to what anyone was saying (Im not sure who OP is). You're just too busy writing people off as trolls to read whats written. He said it didnt work at all with the 7520 MB, and he said his OLD 533Mhz MB was faster in 4.9 than the new MB was in 5.3 so it made no sense to upgrade. So, apparently, doing a PR doesnt work, since the PR you cited has been largely ignored for 3 months. So whats else do you recommend, Ted? PS: the 7520/7530 is required for use of Intel's newest CPUs, so its not some random chipset. It should be way higher in the list of priorities than the peripheral "fixes" noted for 4.11. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:11:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26F816A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:11:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D7D43D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 068AE51399; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:12:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:12:03 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Heinrich Rebehn Message-ID: <20050106191203.GA93129@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41DC0714.2000408@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20050105190455.GA1566@xor.obsecurity.org> <41DD060A.6060501@ant.uni-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DD060A.6060501@ant.uni-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cam_simq_alloc undefined X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:11:25 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > >>I need to load the scsi stuff as modules, because otherwise i have to= =20 > >>reboot after every change to the raid controller's configuration (which= =20 > >>i am playing with ATM). Or is there another way to have the kernel=20 > >>rescan the raid controller for disks? > > > > > >camcontrol rescan? ;) > > > >Kris >=20 > Hi Kris, >=20 > i tried 'camcontrol rescan all' but it did not work. New drives were not= =20 > recognized. Seems like reboot is the way to go.. Surely not :( Kris --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3Y2DWry0BWjoQKURAqoKAKDFjQwERS3hFu40RKnE+0GS7UseLACg8IFj gZmfPNkvYQaHHF7aZh1nF40= =XguX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:13:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C449416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:13:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938F343D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2E53C51824; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:14:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:14:33 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "J.D. Bronson" Message-ID: <20050106191433.GB93129@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106085144.02172c88@cheyenne.wixb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.2.20050106085144.02172c88@cheyenne.wixb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finally a crash dump on 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:13:54 -0000 --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 08:56:45AM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote: > I was up for 2wks and today saw this: >=20 > Fatal trap 12 - page fault while in kernel mode > CPUID 0 APIC ID 0 > Fault write address =3D 0x418ad66c > Fault code =3D supervisor write, page not present >=20 > Inst Pointer =3D 0x8:0xc05109d9 > Stack Pointer =3D 0x10:0xe5ea8978 > Frame Pointer =3D 0x10:0xe5ea8994 > Code Segment base 0x0 limit 0xffff type 0x1b > DPL 0, PRES 1 def 32 1, gran 1 >=20 > current process =3D 7673 (telnetd) >=20 > -JEFF > ..I had thought this was SCSI, but I dont have any scsi drives installed= =20 > and was running on IDE. >=20 > What do I do with this information now that I finally have it ? That's not a crashdump, that's a panic. Check the handbook for the steps required to enable crashdumping. Kris --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3Y4YWry0BWjoQKURAufYAKD7oS6SLXrVJiSpbDZ1t7VFvRraOgCeJnK3 TWtAA4ao5xErh7x05z1UNYY= =C9KS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --61jdw2sOBCFtR2d/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:14:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E74F16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:14:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out006.verizon.net (out006pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498E343D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from FreeBSD@keyslapper.org) Received: from keyslapper.org ([68.163.251.221]) by out006.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050106191415.ZTMD7873.out006.verizon.net@keyslapper.org> for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:14:15 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keyslapper.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A113E11B64 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:14:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from keyslapper.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keyslapper.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69018-08 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:14:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by keyslapper.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1E93111B41; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:14:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:14:14 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20050106191413.GH7017@keyslapper.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at keyslapper.org X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [68.163.251.221] at Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:14:15 -0600 Subject: Samba problems - stopped working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:14:17 -0000 Anyone else seeing problems with Samba3? swat dumps core every time I try to connect - SIGABRT. Smbd & nmbd don't pick up the phone (yes, netstat -an shows listeners on ports 139 and 443). They don't log anything, just no answer. I'm running 5.3 RELEASE, rebuilt yesterday. I don't know when it stopped working, but I'm running the latest samba3 port - rebuilt just today while trying to fix the problem. While building samba, the only apparent problems are the following warnings: checking rpcsvc/yp_prot.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: rpcsvc/yp_prot.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: rpcsvc/yp_prot.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: rpcsvc/yp_prot.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: rpcsvc/yp_prot.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: rpcsvc/yp_prot.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: rpcsvc/yp_prot.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------------ ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------------ ## checking for rpcsvc/yp_prot.h... yes and: checking sys/mount.h presence... yes configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: present but cannot be compiled configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: see the Autoconf documentation configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled" configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result configure: WARNING: sys/mount.h: in the future, the compiler will take precedence configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------------ ## configure: WARNING: ## Report this to the AC_PACKAGE_NAME lists. ## configure: WARNING: ## ------------------------------------------ ## checking for sys/mount.h... yes After seeing these, I went back and removed all the autoconf and automake packages and let them be rebuilt as dependencies, but these warnings still show up. There are also a number of build warnings, but nothing that seems critical to me, but there are some "Passing arg of from incompatible pointer type" errors in a lot of the auth based code. Checking the swat core, it is pretty obvious that the abort() was called somewhere in the authentication calls. Anyone else? Lou -- Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD@keyslapper.org Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org Ô¿Ô¬ A banker is a fellow who lends you his umbrella when the sun is shining and wants it back the minute it begins to rain. -- Mark Twain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:15:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C5316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:15:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0718543D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 934C251354; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:15:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:15:48 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Heinrich Rebehn Message-ID: <20050106191548.GC93129@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41DD5618.6070801@locolomo.org> <41DD5E24.905@ant.uni-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S1BNGpv0yoYahz37" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DD5E24.905@ant.uni-bremen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: M cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP and NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:15:10 -0000 --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:49:56PM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > Since i am going to set up a SMP NFS server too, i would be interested=20 > if this really solves the OP's problem. After all, he is talking about a= =20 > "hard lock with no messages..", as opposed to a "kernel panic", which in= =20 > my understanding always produces messages. Sometimes panics on SMP machines do not reboot cleanly :-( Kris --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3Y5jWry0BWjoQKURAthIAKDbRoM47OEAtSDm09xm98DwRx2SJgCgrvQb OtkERXPe+bi90ji6i5iz2NM= =8784 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --S1BNGpv0yoYahz37-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:17:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BB016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:17:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ADC43D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:17:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC6CE51354; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:17:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:17:57 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Duane Winner Message-ID: <20050106191757.GD93129@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41DD5F25.3060101@att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DD5F25.3060101@att.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: xorg and xfree86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:17:21 -0000 --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:54:13AM -0500, Duane Winner wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I was wondering if anybody could provide me with a brief explanation of= =20 > why FreeBSD has made Xorg the default X11 implementation over XFree86. >=20 > It doesn't really matter to me, I've tried it, it seems to work fine,=20 > and almost exactly the same. >=20 > The only problem I've run into so far is is that my old XF86Config file= =20 > with the refresh rates for my external monitor connected to my laptop=20 > didn't quite take (kept going to 800x600). After some minor fiddling, I= =20 > managed to get it working (I still need to do it again a few times so I= =20 > make sure I understand fully what I'm doing). >=20 > I've read a bunch of docs, but can't seem to find an answer on why=20 > FreeBSD has moved to Xorg. Is it just a political/licensing issue? Like= =20 > I said, it's not a big deal, but I manage the internal 'Howto' document= =20 > for our organization, and since we're in the process of moving from=20 > 5.2.1 to 5.3, it would be nice to have a little mention of why we're=20 > going to Xorg after my entire section for installing X is going to=20 > change from Xfree86 instructions. We took a look at the activity of both projects, and it looked like xorg is more active and is going to be the de facto future standard implementation. FreeBSD also has a closer integration with the xorg project because we have a committer who works on both projects. Kris --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3Y7lWry0BWjoQKURAmaYAJ9eKlJ9zKmMGQO3XikNMjtIbd3tJACeNdNu PyTVzPvDpeBt7RjreQ31igc= =YhjX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:18:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D0316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:18:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32B843D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:18:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 68A9A51354; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:18:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:18:51 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Hendrik.Kluever@sita.co.za Message-ID: <20050106191851.GE93129@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <6C6C4097FCF3D511AD3E001083FA234C35A83A27@mailman.sita.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6C6C4097FCF3D511AD3E001083FA234C35A83A27@mailman.sita.co.za> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ports for FreeBSD 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:18:13 -0000 --gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 05:59:20PM +0200, Hendrik.Kluever@sita.co.za wrote: > Hi >=20 > =20 >=20 > I would just like to enquire what's wrong with the ports for FreeBSD 5.2.1 Nothing, except that 5.2.1 is no longer officially supported (see http://www.freebsd.org/ports) > I want to install ported applications for 5.2.1 and then I get a message > that says ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ > > 5.2.1-RELEASE does not exist Look for another mirror site that still carries it (http://mirrorlist.freebsd.org) Kris --gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3Y8aWry0BWjoQKURAtTcAKDVVPw3PihH2ovDpcmleli2/nzFcACgrd9H 2EtzFKyMvPr5WJrB/rvf2lc= =SNrT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:27:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5418316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:27:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADB743D5D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:27:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard-seibert@rcn.com) Received: from 207-237-110-41.c3-0.crm-ubr4.crm.ny.cable.rcn.com ([207.237.110.41] helo=[192.168.0.2]) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1CmdIO-0000Fs-00; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:27:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:27:47 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: Paul Schmehl Sender: Gerard@FreeBSD.ORG, Seibert@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <37B3AF603F27850132236332@utd49554.utdallas.edu> References: <20050106065102.7B36.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> <37B3AF603F27850132236332@utd49554.utdallas.edu> Message-Id: <20050106140434.E12A.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.12.01 [en] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[4]: Configuring POSTFIX to use mutiple email accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard-seibert@rcn.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:27:45 -0000 On Thursday, January 06, 2005 11:17:05 AM Paul Schmehl wrote: |>--On Thursday, January 06, 2005 06:57:15 AM -0500 Gerard Seibert |> wrote: |>> |>> Therefore, if I have several email addresses that are through different |>> ISP's, don't I have to configure POSTFIX fir each of them? |>> |>No. You're confusing *reading* mail with *sending* mail. All Postfix does |>is send and receive mail. It has nothing to do with how you read your mail |>and there's nothing to configure with regard to how your ISP handles mail. |> |>What you do is configure Postfix so that it can send mail for you (and |>receive if that's possible, but you'd need a domain name for that.) Then |>you configure your email client (MUA) (Evolution, mutt, pine, mulberry, |>whatever) to get mail for each account by entering in to the POP or IMAP |>*incoming* server the name of the server that you fetch that mail from. |>When you configure the SMTP *outgoing* server, you configure it to go to |>Postfix (whatever you named it) and *it* will send the mail to whereever |>you told it to. |> |>If your ISP restricts port 25 so that you can't send mail directly, then |>configure Postfix to send all mail to your ISP's mail server. |> |>If you can provide *specific* information about each account (incoming and |>outgoing servers, *not* your username and password) and your ISP's server |>names as well as their policy about sending mail directly from your |>machine, then we can probably give you specific advise regarding the |>settings you need to have in Postfix. |> |>Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) |>Adjunct Information Security Officer |>The University of Texas at Dallas |>AVIEN Founding Member |>http://www.utdallas.edu ********** Reply Separator ********** Thursday, January 06, 2005 2:04:34 PM My ISP does restrict port 25. So I guess what I really want to know is how do I configure POSTFIX to work under that condition. I do not know if this information is of any help to you, but these are the settings I am using at present in my email program. They are obviously for my ISP. I have a small home network, and am connect via a cable modem. I do not have a static address. I refuse to pay an additional $25 a month just for that. smtp.rcn.com (207.172.4.99) Port 25 pop.rcn.com (207.172.4.95) Port 110 domain name rcn.com (207.172.16.171) Primary DNS#1 ns1.dns.rcn.net (207.172.3.8) Secondary DNS#1 ns2.dns.rcn.net (207.172.3.9) Primary DNS#2 ns3.dns.rcn.net (207.172.3.10) Secondary DNS#2 ns4.dns.rcn.net (207.172.3.11) I hope that this is info is what you were referring to. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:28:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81FA16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:28:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stewie.obfuscated.net (stewie.obfuscated.net [66.118.188.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF0743D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:28:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@obmail.net) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (653259hfc120.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.59.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by stewie.obfuscated.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39C46104; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:28:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <13c.a0c43e8.2f0ebcef@aol.com> References: <13c.a0c43e8.2f0ebcef@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <104435F2-6019-11D9-B88F-00039367611E@obmail.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: M Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:27:54 -0500 To: Tm4528@aol.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.3 Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:28:43 -0000 On Jan 6, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Tm4528@aol.com wrote: > 5.3 is not ready for production. 4.10 should be fully supported until > it is. > > TM > The moment you start paying for development and support I'll agree with you. When I need a particularly low per packet cost such as a firewall I'll throw down some OpenBSD much as I hate to do it. On the other hand there are plenty of workloads I work with where FreeBSD 5 works great for me. Am I pissed as hell at that little NFS bug that's been floating around out there? Sure, but then I didn't drop the cash on a big Sun box to handle the load. While were at it, go look at what you get with Solaris these days. Sun's new OS can't fix the issues they are having with Sun's new hardware. With FreeBSD you have options 1) do the work yourself 2) live with it 3) use another OS that you are either paying for or not. In the mean time we all know you're not happy and none of us are capable of understanding the subtle and nuanced technical reasons why FreeBSD sucks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:33:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DD916A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:33:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E5B43D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:33:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@jwebmedia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (66.49.54.54.nw.nuvox.net [66.49.54.54]) j06JY2QU011062; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:34:03 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:33:41 -0600 From: "Joseph Koenig (jWeb)" To: Joe Koenig , FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit cc: Henry Miller Subject: Re: Hardware or OS problem? System Crashing... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:33:55 -0000 >> On 1/5/2005 at 09:14 Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The system >> is >>> FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the kicker) >> 73GB >>> RAID 1 ATA drives. The system serves as a web/database server >> dedicated to >>> 1 >>> site. Daily the system goes out and downloads real estate listings >> (via >>> shell scripts and cURL) and processes them (via PHP into MySQL). Also, >>> nightly the system downloads a zipped set of images (probably around >>> 400-500) and processes them into thumbnails (PHP scripts calling >>> ImageMagick). Over the last week or two, the system is crashing and >>> rebooting into single user mode. It's not consistently during updates, >> or >>> resizing of images, or anything like that. Yesterday, it crashed with >> 99% >>> processor idle and load averages of 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- I was watching a >>> 'top' >>> when the machine died. When it boots into single user mode, an fsck >> must be >>> run, which identified a few corrupt JPEG files -- however, the >> sysadmin who >>> reboots it never tells me which files they are. The sysadmin is >> convinced >>> it >>> is a FreeBSD problem and says that Linux will not crash because of a >>> corrupt >>> file and if it does, will not boot into single user mode and he will >> be >>> able >>> to access it remotely to do the fsck. About 3-4 weeks ago, one of the >>> drives >>> in the mirror set crashed and had to be replaced. I'm not convinced >> that >>> drives are not to blame for these issues. Is there any way to verify >> that? >>> Is it possible a corrupt JPEG on the drive could cause the system to >> crash >>> randomly? What can I do to correctly identify the problem so that we >> can >>> fix >>> it and not change the OS? Thanks, >> >> The sysadmin has no clue about either linux or freebsd! >> >> A corrupt JPEG cannot cause a crash of the OS, for any real OS. (If it >> does, it is a bug in the OS, but I doubt one exists) Real OS includes >> Windows XP, linux, and FreeBSD. >> >> However, an OS crash can cause a corrupt JPEG! >> >> Either linux or FreeBSD may boot into single user mode when the >> filesystem is corrupt. What your sysadmin means is that with one of >> the newer filesystems Linux uses journeling, which is much less likely >> to enter this situation, but it still can happen. With soft updates >> FreeBSD is in the same situation as linux, but softupdates is >> (generally, there are exceptions) better than journeling. There is >> softupdates in Freebsd 4.9, but I'm not sure how to enable it, or how >> good it is. (in 5.3 it is awesome!) >> >> I suspect hardware. >> >> I'd burn memtest to a CD, and run that for a few hours to see if >> something is identified. Memtest won't catch everything, but it does >> a pretty good job. >> >> Also look at other factors. Does the HVAC kick in when this happens? >> Is someone hitting the panic stop switch? Situations like that have >> happened, and they can take a while to debug. They are not likely, but >> don't rule them out. >> >> FreeBSD 4.9 is fairly old at this point. You should seriously >> consider upgrading to 4.11 (due out in a few weeks), or 5.3 (my >> recommendation, but a much more involved upgrade). >> > > In addition, to the original problem stated above, we are seeing a number of > problems like "...in free(): warning: modified (page-) pointer" and "...in > free(): warning: chunk is already free". I have them admin running a memtest > today, but wanted to make sure these errors were not indicative of something > else going on. Thanks, > Well, the sysadmin tells me that memtest passed. Any one have any suggestions as to what could be causing the crashes? Thanks, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:50:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FBA16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:50:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d22.mx.aol.com (imo-d22.mx.aol.com [205.188.144.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1161043D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:50:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-d22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id 7.190.36b42928 (4418); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:50:08 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <190.36b42928.2f0ef070@aol.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:50:08 EST To: m@obmail.net MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.3 Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:50:32 -0000 >The moment you start paying for development and support I'll agree with >you. Getting an incompetent like you to agree with me is so far from important that I can't help but smile about the thought of it.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:51:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFB316A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:51:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EB643D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:51:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd49554 (utd49554.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.85]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF9C3894D1; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:51:44 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:51:44 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: gerard-seibert@rcn.com Message-ID: <17A0273C61EEEE039F9A13FC@utd49554.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050106140434.E12A.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> References: <20050106065102.7B36.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> <37B3AF603F27850132236332@utd49554.utdallas.edu> <20050106140434.E12A.GERARD-SEIBERT@rcn.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[4]: Configuring POSTFIX to use mutiple email accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Schmehl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:51:44 -0000 --On Thursday, January 06, 2005 02:27:47 PM -0500 Gerard Seibert wrote: > > My ISP does restrict port 25. So I guess what I really want to know is > how do I configure POSTFIX to work under that condition. > In main.cf, set "relayhost = smtp.rcn.com This tells postfix that any mail it is to send *must* be sent to smtp.rcn.com, and smtp.rcn.com will then send the mail on to its final destination. Then, in your mail client, you designate your instance of postfix as the outgoing mail server. *However*, you really don't have to do all this, and endure the hassle of having to learn SMTP and Postfix, if all you want to do is send and receive email. Just set your outgoing mail server for all your accounts to smtp.rcn.com and let them do all the work for you. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 19:58:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8301616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:58:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257E043D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:58:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssalamander@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so248064rne for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:58:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EbFAn4/UoxNLQOAHx9kp9/HKE3XNQw1B7sjDWaAH78nY8dZ4tUNuooJ15cCq9WMHKelztOwAG7KOkDu2EH3iWWY4HdInDurKwj8iXlyz0RRxUX4V5vs81mqTl/q5QbYwe9RTwGa924gidZYkcHLfyayoUjT5AP6SM9rHuGDo/aQ= Received: by 10.38.9.49 with SMTP id 49mr103570rni; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:58:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.152.12 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:58:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <81bf90de0501061158f0b0131@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:58:22 -0500 From: S Salamander To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Changing my locale X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: S Salamander List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:58:23 -0000 I'm using GDM to log into KDE. I've set the locale option on the GDM login screen to US English (en-us UTF-8) but noticed that in my Evolution mail reader that the mail folders are being sorted case sensitively. This shouldn't be the case if the locale is set as I thought it was. Running 'locale' from my bash prompt shows en_US UTF-8 for all options, but most are quoted ("en_US UTF-8") leading me to believe they're not correct and falling back to C. How do I change the locale 'the right way"? I'm not at that machine right now, so if the output above is off a letter or two, I apologize. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 20:04:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7A916A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:04:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr (smtp8.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C51E43D31 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:04:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 3C9BA1C002BB for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:04:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0802.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1D4361C00264 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:04:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:04:12 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <659027645.20050106210412@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <015301c4f3e8$58464920$92a7cb52@rekon> References: <1761142680.20050104050725@wanadoo.fr> <040201c4f372$06d09210$92a7cb52@rekon> <1507832106.20050106024812@wanadoo.fr> <015301c4f3e8$58464920$92a7cb52@rekon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Running top on system console without being logged on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:04:14 -0000 Reko Turja writes: RT> Actually not command line options as such, but you can make a login RT> class for the top user in /etc/login.conf and feed the options via TOP RT> environment variable from there. RT> RT> You cant shell out from top and renicing from non root account is RT> impossible (except dropping the niceness of your own process). I think RT> the approach is secure enough and if you give "topper" good enough RT> password or deny logon from anywhere except from console, everything RT> should be ok. Of course if the terminal is accessible to others than RT> administrative staff, giving out the usernames can be a risk, but you RT> can use the usernumbers option to avoid giving out the usernames. RT> RT> Did myself something very similar with a IPless firewall between a while RT> back but I ran vmstat in the console instead. Good one glance monitoring RT> without the need of logging on the machine itself. I created a special user that logs directly into top. I don't run telnet or anything so login isn't possible from anywhere else, and it's a plain user account with a good password. It seems to work pretty well. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 20:05:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E0516A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:05:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr (smtp8.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962CA43D2F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:05:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0807.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id B67381C00247 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:05:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0807.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2C93D1C00149 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:05:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:05:22 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1688294567.20050106210522@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050106071152.GF12003@lb.tenfour> References: <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> <20050106071152.GF12003@lb.tenfour> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:05:24 -0000 Dick Davies writes: DD> The phrase 'Java is the COBOL of the nineties' springs to mind.... At least COBOL served a useful purpose (and still does). -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 20:24:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0752216A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:24:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4671F43D69 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:24:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j06KOC91061533; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:24:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost)j06KOBaX061530; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:24:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:24:11 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: Ronny Fischer In-Reply-To: <58BFB7CE61460E48BC3142FF352ECD2C0C04D6@srv100.itknowledge.local> Message-ID: <20050106134003.Q53213@pemaquid.safeport.com> References: <58BFB7CE61460E48BC3142FF352ECD2C0C04D6@srv100.itknowledge.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-302811850-1105043051=:53213" cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:24:16 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-302811850-1105043051=:53213 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE No magic and little more than the first sentence said: FYI - there is a work around for this. The vesa driver works okay. I jus= t ran xorgconfig and added Mode and DefaultDepth statements. The driver se= ems kind of funky in that the screen is scrambled for a second or so and the= n seems to work okay. My memory was that I just ran 'Xorg -configure' and changed the driver and added the screen section. I included the file because a 'diff -u' with a le= ft over xorg.conf does not seem to bear that out. Still, that's all I did. I am running xorg 6.7 using the vesa driver. At some point I intend to try = 6.8 of xorg. It appears the ati driver has been updated but information is a b= it difficult (at least for me) to come by from the Xorg site. On my hardware, the vesa driver works pretty well, the only problems being = the default X fonts are not rendered as well, I can not use 1400x1050 resolutio= n, and the screen memory does not seem be handled as well as with the ati driv= er. This later is not really a problem (for me) as it results in the screen fro= m a previous session appearing when xorg start after a reboot and some funky patterns starting xdm. Hope this helps. On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Ronny Fischer wrote: > Hi Doug > > I saw your answer at > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-November/065330= =2Ehtml > > and would like to ask, where can I found this workaround ? > > I have a Sony PCG-C1VE with an ATi 3D Rage Mobility and a screen resoluti= on of 1024x480 > (specs here : http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/notebooks/0,39023984,10= 000247,00.htm) > > Xorg is working with 8 bit colour. If I switch to 16 or 24 I see only a g= rey monitor. > I have also tryed the vesa driver. This is only working with 640x480 > > Please, please, please, do you have any hint for me where I can found a s= olution ? > I search the web since three day=B4s and have not found any solution that= is working. > > Thanx a lot in avance, > HAVE FUN and > with my best regards > Ronny > http://the.fischerman.ch > mailto: info@fischerman.ch > > > ######################################################################## > This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared > by NetIQ MailMarshal, the e-mail content security solution > ######################################################################## > _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 --0-302811850-1105043051=:53213 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="xorg.conf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20050106152411.Y53213@pemaquid.safeport.com> Content-Description: xorg.conf using vesa driver Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xorg.conf" IyBGaWxlIGdlbmVyYXRlZCBieSB4Zjg2Y29uZmlnLg0KDQojDQojIENvcHly aWdodCAoYykgMjAwNCwgYnkgdGhlIFguT3JnDQojDQojIFBlcm1pc3Npb24g aXMgaGVyZWJ5IGdyYW50ZWQsIGZyZWUgb2YgY2hhcmdlLCB0byBhbnkgcGVy c29uIG9idGFpbmluZyBhDQojIGNvcHkgb2YgdGhpcyBzb2Z0d2FyZSBhbmQg YXNzb2NpYXRlZCBkb2N1bWVudGF0aW9uIGZpbGVzICh0aGUgIlNvZnR3YXJl IiksDQojIHRvIGRlYWwgaW4gdGhlIFNvZnR3YXJlIHdpdGhvdXQgcmVzdHJp Y3Rpb24sIGluY2x1ZGluZyB3aXRob3V0IGxpbWl0YXRpb24NCiMgdGhlIHJp Z2h0cyB0byB1c2UsIGNvcHksIG1vZGlmeSwgbWVyZ2UsIHB1Ymxpc2gsIGRp c3RyaWJ1dGUsIHN1YmxpY2Vuc2UsDQojIGFuZC9vciBzZWxsIGNvcGllcyBv ZiB0aGUgU29mdHdhcmUsIGFuZCB0byBwZXJtaXQgcGVyc29ucyB0byB3aG9t IHRoZQ0KIyBTb2Z0d2FyZSBpcyBmdXJuaXNoZWQgdG8gZG8gc28sIHN1Ympl Y3QgdG8gdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBjb25kaXRpb25zOg0KIyANCiMgVGhlIGFi b3ZlIGNvcHlyaWdodCBub3RpY2UgYW5kIHRoaXMgcGVybWlzc2lvbiBub3Rp Y2Ugc2hhbGwgYmUgaW5jbHVkZWQgaW4NCiMgYWxsIGNvcGllcyBvciBzdWJz dGFudGlhbCBwb3J0aW9ucyBvZiB0aGUgU29mdHdhcmUuDQojIA0KIyBUSEUg U09GVFdBUkUgSVMgUFJPVklERUQgIkFTIElTIiwgV0lUSE9VVCBXQVJSQU5U WSBPRiBBTlkgS0lORCwgRVhQUkVTUyBPUg0KIyBJTVBMSUVELCBJTkNMVURJ TkcgQlVUIE5PVCBMSU1JVEVEIFRPIFRIRSBXQVJSQU5USUVTIE9GIE1FUkNI QU5UQUJJTElUWSwNCiMgRklUTkVTUyBGT1IgQSBQQVJUSUNVTEFSIFBVUlBP U0UgQU5EIE5PTklORlJJTkdFTUVOVC4gIElOIE5PIEVWRU5UIFNIQUxMDQoj IFRIRSBYRlJFRTg2IFBST0pFQ1QgQkUgTElBQkxFIEZPUiBBTlkgQ0xBSU0s IERBTUFHRVMgT1IgT1RIRVIgTElBQklMSVRZLA0KIyBXSEVUSEVSIElOIEFO IEFDVElPTiBPRiBDT05UUkFDVCwgVE9SVCBPUiBPVEhFUldJU0UsIEFSSVNJ TkcgRlJPTSwgT1VUIE9GDQojIE9SIElOIENPTk5FQ1RJT04gV0lUSCBUSEUg U09GVFdBUkUgT1IgVEhFIFVTRSBPUiBPVEhFUiBERUFMSU5HUyBJTiBUSEUN CiMgU09GVFdBUkUuDQojIA0KIyBFeGNlcHQgYXMgY29udGFpbmVkIGluIHRo aXMgbm90aWNlLCB0aGUgbmFtZSBvZiBYLk9yZyBzaGFsbA0KIyBub3QgYmUg dXNlZCBpbiBhZHZlcnRpc2luZyBvciBvdGhlcndpc2UgdG8gcHJvbW90ZSB0 aGUgc2FsZSwgdXNlIG9yIG90aGVyDQojIGRlYWxpbmdzIGluIHRoaXMgU29m dHdhcmUgd2l0aG91dCBwcmlvciB3cml0dGVuIGF1dGhvcml6YXRpb24gZnJv bSB0aGUNCiMgWC5PcmcuDQojDQoNCiMgKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKg0KIyBSZWZlciB0byB0aGUgWEY4NkNvbmZpZyg0LzUpIG1hbiBwYWdl IGZvciBkZXRhaWxzIGFib3V0IHRoZSBmb3JtYXQgb2YgDQojIHRoaXMgZmls ZS4NCiMgKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KDQojICoqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioNCiMgTW9kdWxlIHNlY3Rpb24gLS0gdGhpcyAg c2VjdGlvbiAgaXMgdXNlZCB0byBzcGVjaWZ5DQojIHdoaWNoIGR5bmFtaWNh bGx5IGxvYWRhYmxlIG1vZHVsZXMgdG8gbG9hZC4NCiMgKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KIw0KU2VjdGlvbiAiTW9kdWxlIg0KDQojIFRoaXMg bG9hZHMgdGhlIERCRSBleHRlbnNpb24gbW9kdWxlLg0KDQogICAgTG9hZCAg ICAgICAgImRiZSIgIAkjIERvdWJsZSBidWZmZXIgZXh0ZW5zaW9uDQoNCiMg VGhpcyBsb2FkcyB0aGUgbWlzY2VsbGFuZW91cyBleHRlbnNpb25zIG1vZHVs ZSwgYW5kIGRpc2FibGVzDQojIGluaXRpYWxpc2F0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBYRnJl ZTg2LURHQSBleHRlbnNpb24gd2l0aGluIHRoYXQgbW9kdWxlLg0KICAgIFN1 YlNlY3Rpb24gICJleHRtb2QiDQogICAgICBPcHRpb24gICAgIm9taXQgeGZy ZWU4Ni1kZ2EiICAgIyBkb24ndCBpbml0aWFsaXNlIHRoZSBER0EgZXh0ZW5z aW9uDQogICAgRW5kU3ViU2VjdGlvbg0KDQojIFRoaXMgbG9hZHMgdGhlIFR5 cGUxIGFuZCBGcmVlVHlwZSBmb250IG1vZHVsZXMNCiAgICBMb2FkICAgICAg ICAidHlwZTEiDQogICAgTG9hZCAgICAgICAgInNwZWVkbyINCiAgICBMb2Fk ICAgICAgICAiZnJlZXR5cGUiDQojICAgIExvYWQgICAgICAgICJ4dHQiDQoN CiMgVGhpcyBsb2FkcyB0aGUgR0xYIG1vZHVsZQ0KIyAgICBMb2FkICAgICAg ICJnbHgiDQojIFRoaXMgbG9hZHMgdGhlIERSSSBtb2R1bGUNCiMgICAgTG9h ZCAgICAgICAiZHJpIg0KDQpFbmRTZWN0aW9uDQoNCiMgKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KIyBGaWxlcyBzZWN0aW9uLiAgVGhpcyBhbGxvd3Mg ZGVmYXVsdCBmb250IGFuZCByZ2IgcGF0aHMgdG8gYmUgc2V0DQojICoqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioNCg0KU2VjdGlvbiAiRmlsZXMiDQoNCiMg VGhlIGxvY2F0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBSR0IgZGF0YWJhc2UuICBOb3RlLCB0aGlz IGlzIHRoZSBuYW1lIG9mIHRoZQ0KIyBmaWxlIG1pbnVzIHRoZSBleHRlbnNp b24gKGxpa2UgIi50eHQiIG9yICIuZGIiKS4gIFRoZXJlIGlzIG5vcm1hbGx5 DQojIG5vIG5lZWQgdG8gY2hhbmdlIHRoZSBkZWZhdWx0Lg0KDQogICAgUmdi UGF0aAkiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDExL3JnYiINCg0KIyBNdWx0aXBsZSBG b250UGF0aCBlbnRyaWVzIGFyZSBhbGxvd2VkICh3aGljaCBhcmUgY29uY2F0 ZW5hdGVkIHRvZ2V0aGVyKSwNCiMgYXMgd2VsbCBhcyBzcGVjaWZ5aW5nIG11 bHRpcGxlIGNvbW1hLXNlcGFyYXRlZCBlbnRyaWVzIGluIG9uZSBGb250UGF0 aA0KIyBjb21tYW5kIChvciBhIGNvbWJpbmF0aW9uIG9mIGJvdGggbWV0aG9k cykNCiMgDQojIElmIHlvdSBkb24ndCBoYXZlIGEgZmxvYXRpbmcgcG9pbnQg Y29wcm9jZXNzb3IgYW5kIGVtYWNzLCBNb3NhaWMgb3Igb3RoZXINCiMgcHJv Z3JhbXMgdGFrZSBsb25nIHRvIHN0YXJ0IHVwLCB0cnkgbW92aW5nIHRoZSBU eXBlMSBhbmQgU3BlZWRvIGRpcmVjdG9yeQ0KIyB0byB0aGUgZW5kIG9mIHRo aXMgbGlzdCAob3IgY29tbWVudCB0aGVtIG91dCkuDQojIA0KDQogICAgRm9u dFBhdGggICAiL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9zaGFyZS9mb250cyINCiAgICBGb250UGF0 aCAgICIvdXNyL1gxMVI2L2xpYi9YMTEvZm9udHMvbG9jYWwvIg0KICAgIEZv bnRQYXRoICAgIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gxMS9mb250cy9taXNjLyINCiAg ICBGb250UGF0aCAgICIvdXNyL1gxMVI2L2xpYi9YMTEvZm9udHMvNzVkcGkv OnVuc2NhbGVkIg0KICAgIEZvbnRQYXRoICAgIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gx MS9mb250cy8xMDBkcGkvOnVuc2NhbGVkIg0KICAgIEZvbnRQYXRoICAgIi91 c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gxMS9mb250cy9TcGVlZG8vIg0KICAgIEZvbnRQYXRo ICAgIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gxMS9mb250cy9UeXBlMS8iDQojICAgIEZv bnRQYXRoICAgIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gxMS9mb250cy9UcnVlVHlwZS8i DQojICAgIEZvbnRQYXRoICAgIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL1gxMS9mb250cy9m cmVlZm9udC8iDQogICAgRm9udFBhdGggICAiL3Vzci9YMTFSNi9saWIvWDEx L2ZvbnRzLzc1ZHBpLyINCiAgICBGb250UGF0aCAgICIvdXNyL1gxMVI2L2xp Yi9YMTEvZm9udHMvMTAwZHBpLyINCg0KIyBUaGUgbW9kdWxlIHNlYXJjaCBw YXRoLiAgVGhlIGRlZmF1bHQgcGF0aCBpcyBzaG93biBoZXJlLg0KDQojICAg IE1vZHVsZVBhdGggIi91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL21vZHVsZXMiDQoNCkVuZFNl Y3Rpb24NCg0KIyAqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQojIFNlcnZl ciBmbGFncyBzZWN0aW9uLg0KIyAqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq DQoNClNlY3Rpb24gIlNlcnZlckZsYWdzIg0KDQojIFVuY29tbWVudCB0aGlz IHRvIGNhdXNlIGEgY29yZSBkdW1wIGF0IHRoZSBzcG90IHdoZXJlIGEgc2ln bmFsIGlzIA0KIyByZWNlaXZlZC4gIFRoaXMgbWF5IGxlYXZlIHRoZSBjb25z b2xlIGluIGFuIHVudXNhYmxlIHN0YXRlLCBidXQgbWF5DQojIHByb3ZpZGUg YSBiZXR0ZXIgc3RhY2sgdHJhY2UgaW4gdGhlIGNvcmUgZHVtcCB0byBhaWQg aW4gZGVidWdnaW5nDQoNCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICJOb1RyYXBTaWduYWxzIg0K DQojIFVuY29tbWVudCB0aGlzIHRvIGRpc2FibGUgdGhlIDxDcnRsPjxBbHQ+ PEZuPiBWVCBzd2l0Y2ggc2VxdWVuY2UNCiMgKHdoZXJlIG4gaXMgMSB0aHJv dWdoIDEyKS4gIFRoaXMgYWxsb3dzIGNsaWVudHMgdG8gcmVjZWl2ZSB0aGVz ZSBrZXkNCiMgZXZlbnRzLg0KDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiRG9udFZUU3dpdGNo Ig0KDQojIFVuY29tbWVudCB0aGlzIHRvIGRpc2FibGUgdGhlIDxDcnRsPjxB bHQ+PEJTPiBzZXJ2ZXIgYWJvcnQgc2VxdWVuY2UNCiMgVGhpcyBhbGxvd3Mg Y2xpZW50cyB0byByZWNlaXZlIHRoaXMga2V5IGV2ZW50Lg0KDQojICAgIE9w dGlvbiAiRG9udFphcCINCg0KIyBVbmNvbW1lbnQgdGhpcyB0byBkaXNhYmxl IHRoZSA8Q3J0bD48QWx0PjxLUF8rPi88S1BfLT4gbW9kZSBzd2l0Y2hpbmcN CiMgc2VxdWVuY2VzLiAgVGhpcyBhbGxvd3MgY2xpZW50cyB0byByZWNlaXZl IHRoZXNlIGtleSBldmVudHMuDQoNCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICJEb250IFpvb20i DQoNCiMgVW5jb21tZW50IHRoaXMgdG8gZGlzYWJsZSB0dW5pbmcgd2l0aCB0 aGUgeHZpZHR1bmUgY2xpZW50LiBXaXRoDQojIGl0IHRoZSBjbGllbnQgY2Fu IHN0aWxsIHJ1biBhbmQgZmV0Y2ggY2FyZCBhbmQgbW9uaXRvciBhdHRyaWJ1 dGVzLA0KIyBidXQgaXQgd2lsbCBub3QgYmUgYWxsb3dlZCB0byBjaGFuZ2Ug dGhlbS4gSWYgaXQgdHJpZXMgaXQgd2lsbA0KIyByZWNlaXZlIGEgcHJvdG9j b2wgZXJyb3IuDQoNCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICJEaXNhYmxlVmlkTW9kZUV4dGVu c2lvbiINCg0KIyBVbmNvbW1lbnQgdGhpcyB0byBlbmFibGUgdGhlIHVzZSBv ZiBhIG5vbi1sb2NhbCB4dmlkdHVuZSBjbGllbnQuIA0KDQojICAgIE9wdGlv biAiQWxsb3dOb25Mb2NhbFh2aWR0dW5lIg0KDQojIFVuY29tbWVudCB0aGlz IHRvIGRpc2FibGUgZHluYW1pY2FsbHkgbW9kaWZ5aW5nIHRoZSBpbnB1dCBk ZXZpY2UNCiMgKG1vdXNlIGFuZCBrZXlib2FyZCkgc2V0dGluZ3MuIA0KDQoj ICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiRGlzYWJsZU1vZEluRGV2Ig0KDQojIFVuY29tbWVudCB0 aGlzIHRvIGVuYWJsZSB0aGUgdXNlIG9mIGEgbm9uLWxvY2FsIGNsaWVudCB0 bw0KIyBjaGFuZ2UgdGhlIGtleWJvYXJkIG9yIG1vdXNlIHNldHRpbmdzIChj dXJyZW50bHkgb25seSB4c2V0KS4NCg0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gIkFsbG93Tm9u TG9jYWxNb2RJbkRldiINCg0KRW5kU2VjdGlvbg0KDQojICoqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioNCiMgSW5wdXQgZGV2aWNlcw0KIyAqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQoNCiMgKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq Kg0KIyBDb3JlIGtleWJvYXJkJ3MgSW5wdXREZXZpY2Ugc2VjdGlvbg0KIyAq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQoNClNlY3Rpb24gIklucHV0RGV2 aWNlIg0KDQogICAgSWRlbnRpZmllcgkiS2V5Ym9hcmQxIg0KICAgIERyaXZl cgkiS2V5Ym9hcmQiDQoNCiMgRm9yIG1vc3QgT1NzIHRoZSBwcm90b2NvbCBj YW4gYmUgb21pdHRlZCAoaXQgZGVmYXVsdHMgdG8gIlN0YW5kYXJkIikuDQoj IFdoZW4gdXNpbmcgWFFVRVVFIChvbmx5IGZvciBTVlIzIGFuZCBTVlI0LCBi dXQgbm90IFNvbGFyaXMpLA0KIyB1bmNvbW1lbnQgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBs aW5lLg0KDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAgICAgIlByb3RvY29sIiAgICAgICJYcXVl dWUiDQoNCiAgICBPcHRpb24gIkF1dG9SZXBlYXQiICI1MDAgMzAiDQoNCiMg U3BlY2lmeSB3aGljaCBrZXlib2FyZCBMRURzIGNhbiBiZSB1c2VyLWNvbnRy b2xsZWQgKGVnLCB3aXRoIHhzZXQoMSkpDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbgkiWGxlZHMi ICAgICAgIjEgMiAzIg0KDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiTGVmdEFsdCIgICAgICJN ZXRhIg0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gIlJpZ2h0QWx0IiAgICAiTW9kZVNoaWZ0Ig0K DQojIFRvIGN1c3RvbWlzZSB0aGUgWEtCIHNldHRpbmdzIHRvIHN1aXQgeW91 ciBrZXlib2FyZCwgbW9kaWZ5IHRoZQ0KIyBsaW5lcyBiZWxvdyAod2hpY2gg YXJlIHRoZSBkZWZhdWx0cykuICBGb3IgZXhhbXBsZSwgZm9yIGEgbm9uLVUu Uy4NCiMga2V5Ym9hcmQsIHlvdSB3aWxsIHByb2JhYmx5IHdhbnQgdG8gdXNl Og0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gIlhrYk1vZGVsIiAgICAicGMxMDIiDQojIElmIHlv dSBoYXZlIGEgVVMgTWljcm9zb2Z0IE5hdHVyYWwga2V5Ym9hcmQsIHlvdSBj YW4gdXNlOg0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gIlhrYk1vZGVsIiAgICAibWljcm9zb2Z0 Ig0KIw0KIyBUaGVuIHRvIGNoYW5nZSB0aGUgbGFuZ3VhZ2UsIGNoYW5nZSB0 aGUgTGF5b3V0IHNldHRpbmcuDQojIEZvciBleGFtcGxlLCBhIGdlcm1hbiBs YXlvdXQgY2FuIGJlIG9idGFpbmVkIHdpdGg6DQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiWGti TGF5b3V0IiAgICJkZSINCiMgb3I6DQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiWGtiTGF5b3V0 IiAgICJkZSINCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICJYa2JWYXJpYW50IiAgIm5vZGVhZGtl eXMiDQojDQojIElmIHlvdSdkIGxpa2UgdG8gc3dpdGNoIHRoZSBwb3NpdGlv bnMgb2YgeW91ciBjYXBzbG9jayBhbmQNCiMgY29udHJvbCBrZXlzLCB1c2U6 DQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiWGtiT3B0aW9ucyIgICJjdHJsOnN3YXBjYXBzIg0K DQojIFRoZXNlIGFyZSB0aGUgZGVmYXVsdCBYS0Igc2V0dGluZ3MgZm9yIFgu T3JnDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiWGtiUnVsZXMiICAgICJfX1hLQkRFRlJVTEVT X18iDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiWGtiTW9kZWwiICAgICJwYzEwMSINCiMgICAg T3B0aW9uICJYa2JMYXlvdXQiICAgInVzIg0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gIlhrYlZh cmlhbnQiICAiIg0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gIlhrYk9wdGlvbnMiICAiIg0KDQoj ICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiWGtiRGlzYWJsZSINCg0KICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiWGtiUnVs ZXMiCSJ4b3JnIg0KICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiWGtiTW9kZWwiCSJwYzEwMSINCiAg ICBPcHRpb24gIlhrYkxheW91dCIJInVzIg0KDQpFbmRTZWN0aW9uDQoNCg0K IyAqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQojIENvcmUgUG9pbnRlcidz IElucHV0RGV2aWNlIHNlY3Rpb24NCiMgKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKg0KDQpTZWN0aW9uICJJbnB1dERldmljZSINCg0KIyBJZGVudGlmaWVy IGFuZCBkcml2ZXINCg0KICAgIElkZW50aWZpZXIJIk1vdXNlMSINCiAgICBE cml2ZXIJIm1vdXNlIg0KICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiUHJvdG9jb2wiICAgICJBdXRv Ig0KICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiRGV2aWNlIiAgICAgICIvZGV2L3N5c21vdXNlIg0K DQojIE1vdXNlLXNwZWVkIHNldHRpbmcgZm9yIFBTLzIgbW91c2UuDQoNCiMg ICAgT3B0aW9uICJSZXNvbHV0aW9uIgkiMjU2Ig0KDQojIFdoZW4gdXNpbmcg WFFVRVVFLCBjb21tZW50IG91dCB0aGUgYWJvdmUgdHdvIGxpbmVzLCBhbmQg dW5jb21tZW50DQojIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgbGluZS4NCg0KIyAgICBPcHRp b24gIlByb3RvY29sIgkiWHF1ZXVlIg0KDQojIEJhdWRyYXRlIGFuZCBTYW1w bGVSYXRlIGFyZSBvbmx5IGZvciBzb21lIExvZ2l0ZWNoIG1pY2UuIEluDQoj IGFsbW9zdCBldmVyeSBjYXNlIHRoZXNlIGxpbmVzIHNob3VsZCBiZSBvbWl0 dGVkLg0KDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiQmF1ZFJhdGUiCSI5NjAwIg0KIyAgICBP cHRpb24gIlNhbXBsZVJhdGUiCSIxNTAiDQoNCiMgRW11bGF0ZTNCdXR0b25z IGlzIGFuIG9wdGlvbiBmb3IgMi1idXR0b24gTWljcm9zb2Z0IG1pY2UNCiMg RW11bGF0ZTNUaW1lb3V0IGlzIHRoZSB0aW1lb3V0IGluIG1pbGxpc2Vjb25k cyAoZGVmYXVsdCBpcyA1MG1zKQ0KDQogICAgT3B0aW9uICJFbXVsYXRlM0J1 dHRvbnMiDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAiRW11bGF0ZTNUaW1lb3V0IiAgICAiNTAi DQoNCiMgQ2hvcmRNaWRkbGUgaXMgYW4gb3B0aW9uIGZvciBzb21lIDMtYnV0 dG9uIExvZ2l0ZWNoIG1pY2UNCg0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gIkNob3JkTWlkZGxl Ig0KDQpFbmRTZWN0aW9uDQoNCg0KIyAqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqDQojIE90aGVyIGlucHV0IGRldmljZSBzZWN0aW9ucyANCiMgdGhpcyBp cyBvcHRpb25hbCBhbmQgaXMgcmVxdWlyZWQgb25seSBpZiB5b3UNCiMgYXJl IHVzaW5nIGV4dGVuZGVkIGlucHV0IGRldmljZXMuICBUaGlzIGlzIGZvciBl eGFtcGxlIG9ubHkuICBSZWZlcg0KIyB0byB0aGUgWEY4NkNvbmZpZyBtYW4g cGFnZSBmb3IgYSBkZXNjcmlwdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgb3B0aW9ucy4NCiMgKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KIw0KIyBTZWN0aW9uICJJbnB1dERl dmljZSIgDQojICAgIElkZW50aWZpZXIgICJNb3VzZTIiDQojICAgIERyaXZl ciAgICAgICJtb3VzZSINCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICAgICAgIlByb3RvY29sIiAg ICAgICJNb3VzZU1hbiINCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICAgICAgIkRldmljZSIgICAg ICAgICIvZGV2L21vdXNlMiINCiMgRW5kU2VjdGlvbg0KIw0KIyBTZWN0aW9u ICJJbnB1dERldmljZSINCiMgICAgSWRlbnRpZmllciAic3BhY2ViYWxsIg0K IyAgICBEcml2ZXIgICAgICJtYWdlbGxhbiINCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICAgICAi RGV2aWNlIiAgICAgICAgIi9kZXYvY3VhMCINCiMgRW5kU2VjdGlvbg0KIw0K IyBTZWN0aW9uICJJbnB1dERldmljZSINCiMgICAgSWRlbnRpZmllciAic3Bh Y2ViYWxsMiINCiMgICAgRHJpdmVyICAgICAic3BhY2VvcmIiDQojICAgIE9w dGlvbiAgICAgIkRldmljZSIgICAgICAgICIvZGV2L2N1YTAiDQojIEVuZFNl Y3Rpb24NCiMNCiMgU2VjdGlvbiAiSW5wdXREZXZpY2UiDQojICAgIElkZW50 aWZpZXIgInRvdWNoc2NyZWVuMCINCiMgICAgRHJpdmVyICAgICAibWljcm90 b3VjaCINCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICAgICAiRGV2aWNlIiAgICAgICAgIi9kZXYv dHR5UzAiDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAgICAgIk1pblgiICAgICAgICAgICIxNDEy Ig0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gICAgICJNYXhYIiAgICAgICAgICAiMTUxODQiDQoj ICAgIE9wdGlvbiAgICAgIk1pblkiICAgICAgICAgICIxNTM3MiINCiMgICAg T3B0aW9uICAgICAiTWF4WSIgICAgICAgICAgIjEyMzAiDQojICAgIE9wdGlv biAgICAgIlNjcmVlbk51bWJlciIgICIwIg0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gICAgICJS ZXBvcnRpbmdNb2RlIiAiU2NhbGVkIg0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gICAgICJCdXR0 b25OdW1iZXIiICAiMSINCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICAgICAiU2VuZENvcmVFdmVu dHMiDQojIEVuZFNlY3Rpb24NCiMNCiMgU2VjdGlvbiAiSW5wdXREZXZpY2Ui DQojICAgIElkZW50aWZpZXIgInRvdWNoc2NyZWVuMSINCiMgICAgRHJpdmVy ICAgICAiZWxvMjMwMCINCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICAgICAiRGV2aWNlIiAgICAg ICAgIi9kZXYvdHR5UzAiDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAgICAgIk1pblgiICAgICAg ICAgICIyMzEiDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAgICAgIk1heFgiICAgICAgICAgICIz ODY4Ig0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gICAgICJNaW5ZIiAgICAgICAgICAiMzg1OCIN CiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICAgICAiTWF4WSIgICAgICAgICAgIjI3MiINCiMgICAg T3B0aW9uICAgICAiU2NyZWVuTnVtYmVyIiAgIjAiDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAg ICAgIlJlcG9ydGluZ01vZGUiICJTY2FsZWQiDQojICAgIE9wdGlvbiAgICAg IkJ1dHRvblRocmVzaG9sZCIgICAgICAgIjE3Ig0KIyAgICBPcHRpb24gICAg ICJCdXR0b25OdW1iZXIiICAiMSINCiMgICAgT3B0aW9uICAgICAiU2VuZENv cmVFdmVudHMiDQojIEVuZFNlY3Rpb24NCg0KIyAqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqDQojIE1vbml0b3Igc2VjdGlvbg0KIyAqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqDQoNCiMgQW55IG51bWJlciBvZiBtb25pdG9yIHNlY3Rp b25zIG1heSBiZSBwcmVzZW50DQoNClNlY3Rpb24gIk1vbml0b3IiDQoNCiAg ICBJZGVudGlmaWVyICAiRGVsbCINCg0KIyBIb3JpelN5bmMgaXMgaW4ga0h6 IHVubGVzcyB1bml0cyBhcmUgc3BlY2lmaWVkLg0KIyBIb3JpelN5bmMgbWF5 IGJlIGEgY29tbWEgc2VwYXJhdGVkIGxpc3Qgb2YgZGlzY3JldGUgdmFsdWVz LCBvciBhDQojIGNvbW1hIHNlcGFyYXRlZCBsaXN0IG9mIHJhbmdlcyBvZiB2 YWx1ZXMuDQojIE5PVEU6IFRIRSBWQUxVRVMgSEVSRSBBUkUgRVhBTVBMRVMg T05MWS4gIFJFRkVSIFRPIFlPVVIgTU9OSVRPUidTDQojIFVTRVIgTUFOVUFM IEZPUiBUSEUgQ09SUkVDVCBOVU1CRVJTLg0KDQogICAgSG9yaXpTeW5jICAg MzEuNSAtIDY0LjMNCg0KIyAgICBIb3JpelN5bmMJMzAtNjQgICAgICAgICAj IG11bHRpc3luYw0KIyAgICBIb3JpelN5bmMJMzEuNSwgMzUuMiAgICAjIG11 bHRpcGxlIGZpeGVkIHN5bmMgZnJlcXVlbmNpZXMNCiMgICAgSG9yaXpTeW5j CTE1LTI1LCAzMC01MCAgIyBtdWx0aXBsZSByYW5nZXMgb2Ygc3luYyBmcmVx dWVuY2llcw0KDQojIFZlcnRSZWZyZXNoIGlzIGluIEh6IHVubGVzcyB1bml0 cyBhcmUgc3BlY2lmaWVkLg0KIyBWZXJ0UmVmcmVzaCBtYXkgYmUgYSBjb21t YSBzZXBhcmF0ZWQgbGlzdCBvZiBkaXNjcmV0ZSB2YWx1ZXMsIG9yIGENCiMg Y29tbWEgc2VwYXJhdGVkIGxpc3Qgb2YgcmFuZ2VzIG9mIHZhbHVlcy4NCiMg Tk9URTogVEhFIFZBTFVFUyBIRVJFIEFSRSBFWEFNUExFUyBPTkxZLiAgUkVG RVIgVE8gWU9VUiBNT05JVE9SJ1MNCiMgVVNFUiBNQU5VQUwgRk9SIFRIRSBD T1JSRUNUIE5VTUJFUlMuDQoNCiAgICBWZXJ0UmVmcmVzaCA1MC05MA0KICAg IE1vZGVMaW5lICAgICAiMTQwMHgxMDUwIiAgIDEwNy44NiAgIDE0MDAgMTQ0 MCAxNTUyIDE2ODggICAxMDUwIDEwNTAgMTA1MyAxMDY2ICtoc3luYyArdnN5 bmMNCg0KRW5kU2VjdGlvbg0KDQoNCiMgKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKg0KIyBHcmFwaGljcyBkZXZpY2Ugc2VjdGlvbg0KIyAqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQoNCiMgQW55IG51bWJlciBvZiBncmFwaGljcyBk ZXZpY2Ugc2VjdGlvbnMgbWF5IGJlIHByZXNlbnQNCg0KIyBTdGFuZGFyZCBW R0EgRGV2aWNlOg0KDQpTZWN0aW9uICJEZXZpY2UiDQogICAgSWRlbnRpZmll cgkiU3RhbmRhcmQgVkdBIg0KICAgIFZlbmRvck5hbWUJIlVua25vd24iDQog ICAgQm9hcmROYW1lCSJVbmtub3duIg0KDQojIFRoZSBjaGlwc2V0IGxpbmUg aXMgb3B0aW9uYWwgaW4gbW9zdCBjYXNlcy4gIEl0IGNhbiBiZSB1c2VkIHRv IG92ZXJyaWRlDQojIHRoZSBkcml2ZXIncyBjaGlwc2V0IGRldGVjdGlvbiwg YW5kIHNob3VsZCBub3Qgbm9ybWFsbHkgYmUgc3BlY2lmaWVkLg0KDQojICAg IENoaXBzZXQJImdlbmVyaWMiDQoNCiMgVGhlIERyaXZlciBsaW5lIG11c3Qg YmUgcHJlc2VudC4gIFdoZW4gdXNpbmcgcnVuLXRpbWUgbG9hZGFibGUgZHJp dmVyDQojIG1vZHVsZXMsIHRoaXMgbGluZSBpbnN0cnVjdHMgdGhlIHNlcnZl ciB0byBsb2FkIHRoZSBzcGVjaWZpZWQgZHJpdmVyDQojIG1vZHVsZS4gIEV2 ZW4gd2hlbiBub3QgdXNpbmcgbG9hZGFibGUgZHJpdmVyIG1vZHVsZXMsIHRo aXMgbGluZQ0KIyBpbmRpY2F0ZXMgd2hpY2ggZHJpdmVyIHNob3VsZCBpbnRl cnByZXQgdGhlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIGluIHRoaXMgc2VjdGlvbi4NCg0KICAg IERyaXZlciAgICAgInZnYSINCiMgVGhlIEJ1c0lEIGxpbmUgaXMgdXNlZCB0 byBzcGVjaWZ5IHdoaWNoIG9mIHBvc3NpYmx5IG11bHRpcGxlIGRldmljZXMN CiMgdGhpcyBzZWN0aW9uIGlzIGludGVuZGVkIGZvci4gIFdoZW4gdGhpcyBs aW5lIGlzbid0IHByZXNlbnQsIGEgZGV2aWNlDQojIHNlY3Rpb24gY2FuIG9u bHkgbWF0Y2ggdXAgd2l0aCB0aGUgcHJpbWFyeSB2aWRlbyBkZXZpY2UuICBG b3IgUENJDQojIGRldmljZXMgYSBsaW5lIGxpa2UgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBj b3VsZCBiZSB1c2VkLiAgVGhpcyBsaW5lIHNob3VsZCBub3QNCiMgbm9ybWFs bHkgYmUgaW5jbHVkZWQgdW5sZXNzIHRoZXJlIGlzIG1vcmUgdGhhbiBvbmUg dmlkZW8gZGV2aWNlDQojIGludGFsbGVkLg0KDQojICAgIEJ1c0lEICAgICAg IlBDSTowOjEwOjAiDQoNCiMgICAgVmlkZW9SYW0JMjU2DQoNCiMgICAgQ2xv Y2tzCTI1LjIgMjguMw0KDQpFbmRTZWN0aW9uDQoNCiMgRGV2aWNlIGNvbmZp Z3VyZWQgYnkgeGY4NmNvbmZpZzoNCg0KU2VjdGlvbiAiRGV2aWNlIg0KICAg IElkZW50aWZpZXIgICJSYWdlIE1vYmlsaXR5IFAvTSBBR1AgMngiDQogICAg RHJpdmVyICAgICAgInZlc2EiDQogICAgI1ZpZGVvUmFtICAgIDIwNDgNCiAg ICAjIEluc2VydCBDbG9ja3MgbGluZXMgaGVyZSBpZiBhcHByb3ByaWF0ZQ0K RW5kU2VjdGlvbg0KDQoNCiMgKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0K IyBTY3JlZW4gc2VjdGlvbnMNCiMgKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq Kg0KDQojIEFueSBudW1iZXIgb2Ygc2NyZWVuIHNlY3Rpb25zIG1heSBiZSBw cmVzZW50LiAgRWFjaCBkZXNjcmliZXMNCiMgdGhlIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24g b2YgYSBzaW5nbGUgc2NyZWVuLiAgQSBzaW5nbGUgc3BlY2lmaWMgc2NyZWVu IHNlY3Rpb24NCiMgbWF5IGJlIHNwZWNpZmllZCBmcm9tIHRoZSBYIHNlcnZl ciBjb21tYW5kIGxpbmUgd2l0aCB0aGUgIi1zY3JlZW4iDQojIG9wdGlvbi4N ClNlY3Rpb24gIlNjcmVlbiINCiAgICBJZGVudGlmaWVyICAiU2NyZWVuIDEi DQogICAgRGV2aWNlICAgICAgIlJhZ2UgTW9iaWxpdHkgUC9NIEFHUCAyeCIN CiAgICBNb25pdG9yICAgICAiRGVsbCINCiAgICBEZWZhdWx0RGVwdGggMjQN Cg0KICAgIFN1YnNlY3Rpb24gIkRpc3BsYXkiDQogICAgICAgIERlcHRoICAg ICAgIDgNCiAgICAgICAgTW9kZXMgICAgICAgIjEyODB4MTAyNCIgIjEwMjR4 NzY4IiAiODAweDYwMCIgIjY0MHg0ODAiDQogICAgICAgIFZpZXdQb3J0ICAg IDAgMA0KICAgIEVuZFN1YnNlY3Rpb24NCiAgICBTdWJzZWN0aW9uICJEaXNw bGF5Ig0KICAgICAgICBEZXB0aCAgICAgICAxNg0KICAgICAgICBNb2RlcyAg ICAgICAiMTAyNHg3NjgiICI4MDB4NjAwIiAiNjQweDQ4MCINCiAgICAgICAg Vmlld1BvcnQgICAgMCAwDQogICAgRW5kU3Vic2VjdGlvbg0KICAgIFN1YnNl Y3Rpb24gIkRpc3BsYXkiDQogICAgICAgIERlcHRoICAgICAgIDI0DQogICAg ICAgIE1vZGVzICAgICAgICIxNDAweDEwNTAiICIxMjgweDEwMjQiICIxMDI0 eDc2OCIgIjgwMHg2MDAiDQogICAgICAgIFZpZXdQb3J0ICAgIDAgMA0KICAg IEVuZFN1YnNlY3Rpb24NCkVuZFNlY3Rpb24NCg0KIyAqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqDQojIFNlcnZlckxheW91dCBzZWN0aW9ucy4NCiMgKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKg0KDQojIEFueSBudW1iZXIgb2YgU2Vy dmVyTGF5b3V0IHNlY3Rpb25zIG1heSBiZSBwcmVzZW50LiAgRWFjaCBkZXNj cmliZXMNCiMgdGhlIHdheSBtdWx0aXBsZSBzY3JlZW5zIGFyZSBvcmdhbmlz ZWQuICBBIHNwZWNpZmljIFNlcnZlckxheW91dA0KIyBzZWN0aW9uIG1heSBi ZSBzcGVjaWZpZWQgZnJvbSB0aGUgWCBzZXJ2ZXIgY29tbWFuZCBsaW5lIHdp dGggdGhlDQojICItbGF5b3V0IiBvcHRpb24uICBJbiB0aGUgYWJzZW5jZSBv ZiB0aGlzLCB0aGUgZmlyc3Qgc2VjdGlvbiBpcyB1c2VkLg0KIyBXaGVuIG5v dyBTZXJ2ZXJMYXlvdXQgc2VjdGlvbiBpcyBwcmVzZW50LCB0aGUgZmlyc3Qg U2NyZWVuIHNlY3Rpb24NCiMgaXMgdXNlZCBhbG9uZS4NCg0KU2VjdGlvbiAi U2VydmVyTGF5b3V0Ig0KDQojIFRoZSBJZGVudGlmaWVyIGxpbmUgbXVzdCBi ZSBwcmVzZW50DQogICAgSWRlbnRpZmllciAgIlNpbXBsZSBMYXlvdXQiDQoN CiMgRWFjaCBTY3JlZW4gbGluZSBzcGVjaWZpZXMgYSBTY3JlZW4gc2VjdGlv biBuYW1lLCBhbmQgb3B0aW9uYWxseQ0KIyB0aGUgcmVsYXRpdmUgcG9zaXRp b24gb2Ygb3RoZXIgc2NyZWVucy4gIFRoZSBmb3VyIG5hbWVzIGFmdGVyDQoj IHByaW1hcnkgc2NyZWVuIG5hbWUgYXJlIHRoZSBzY3JlZW5zIHRvIHRoZSB0 b3AsIGJvdHRvbSwgbGVmdCBhbmQgcmlnaHQNCiMgb2YgdGhlIHByaW1hcnkg c2NyZWVuLiAgSW4gdGhpcyBleGFtcGxlLCBzY3JlZW4gMiBpcyBsb2NhdGVk IHRvIHRoZQ0KIyByaWdodCBvZiBzY3JlZW4gMS4NCg0KICAgIFNjcmVlbiAi U2NyZWVuIDEiDQoNCiMgRWFjaCBJbnB1dERldmljZSBsaW5lIHNwZWNpZmll cyBhbiBJbnB1dERldmljZSBzZWN0aW9uIG5hbWUgYW5kDQojIG9wdGlvbmFs bHkgc29tZSBvcHRpb25zIHRvIHNwZWNpZnkgdGhlIHdheSB0aGUgZGV2aWNl IGlzIHRvIGJlDQojIHVzZWQuICBUaG9zZSBvcHRpb25zIGluY2x1ZGUgIkNv cmVQb2ludGVyIiwgIkNvcmVLZXlib2FyZCIgYW5kDQojICJTZW5kQ29yZUV2 ZW50cyIuDQoNCiAgICBJbnB1dERldmljZSAiTW91c2UxIiAiQ29yZVBvaW50 ZXIiDQogICAgSW5wdXREZXZpY2UgIktleWJvYXJkMSIgIkNvcmVLZXlib2Fy ZCINCg0KRW5kU2VjdGlvbg0KDQojIFNlY3Rpb24gIkRSSSINCiMgICAgTW9k ZSAwNjY2DQojIEVuZFNlY3Rpb24NCg0K --0-302811850-1105043051=:53213-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 20:48:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BDA16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:48:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709A243D54 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:48:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b183.otenet.gr [212.205.244.191]) j06KmZ0b010025 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:48:36 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j06KmYpF035432 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:48:35 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j06KmYwK035431 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:48:34 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:48:34 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050106204834.GB35307@gothmog.gr> References: <667459872.20050106025318@wanadoo.fr> <20050106071152.GF12003@lb.tenfour> <1688294567.20050106210522@wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1688294567.20050106210522@wanadoo.fr> Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:48:39 -0000 On 2005-01-06 21:05, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Dick Davies writes: > DD> The phrase 'Java is the COBOL of the nineties' springs to mind.... > > At least COBOL served a useful purpose (and still does). I probably dislike Java more than you do, but I also find it hard to believe that the implied "uselessness of Java" is true for all people who are Java programmers :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 21:01:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7D416A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:01:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030CA43D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:01:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42F0FD049 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:01:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DDA710.5000605@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:01:04 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dhclient and diskless clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:01:09 -0000 Hi, I am trying to setup diskless clients. The Handbook describes how to define special dhcp-options for swap and other variables, however these are not available, unless I use dhclient (compiling the kernel with option BOOTP only makes the hostname available). If I try to start dhclient, I loose connection to the nfs server and hence my / (nfs mounted read-only) because dhclient resets the interface before getting a new lease, system hangs and I can only reboot. Is there a magic option to solve this? Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 21:30:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690D616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:30:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D9F43D54 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:30:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0988FD049; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:30:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DDAE07.1020901@locolomo.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:30:47 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Norgaard References: <41DDA710.5000605@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <41DDA710.5000605@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: dhclient and diskless clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:30:52 -0000 Erik Norgaard wrote: > If I try to start dhclient, I loose connection to the nfs server and > hence my / (nfs mounted read-only) because dhclient resets the interface > before getting a new lease, system hangs and I can only reboot. Is there > a magic option to solve this? Some extra on dhclient: The -n option should force dhclient not to configure any interfaces on startup, but what happens is that it sets the ip to 0.0.0.0 on the specified interfaces. Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 21:36:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489BD16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:36:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao04.cox.net (lakermmtao04.cox.net [68.230.240.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29C043D3F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:36:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from localhost ([68.105.190.58]) by lakermmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20050106213621.VMQE22354.lakermmtao04.cox.net@localhost> for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:36:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:36:20 -0500 From: Bob Hall To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106213433.GA1699@kongemord.krig.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Hall , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: dhclient: send_packet: Permission denied X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:36:24 -0000 I keep getting the message dhclient: send_packet: Permission denied I try sockstat | grep dhclient and get root dhclient 247 4 udp4 *:68 *:* root dhclient 247 6 dgram -> /var/run/log I utter psgrep dhclient and get root 247 0.0 1.0 1812 1284 ?? Ss 2:13PM 0:00.26 /sbin/dhclient rl0 I've tried setting up special rules in the firewall to catch the dhclient packets, and the firewall doesn't seem to be stopping them. The ipfw rules to pass the packets are allow udp from any 68 to 255.255.255.255 dst-port 67 out via rl0 allow udp from any 67 to 255.255.255.255 dst-port 68 in via rl0 "ipfw show" doesn't register any packets even when dhclient is complaining about not being able to send packets. I can get an IP address, no problem. From the messages log: dhclient: New IP Address (rl0): dhclient: New Subnet Mask (rl0): 255.255.254.0 dhclient: New Broadcast Address (rl0): dhclient: New Routers: But even with this, I'm still getting the Permissin denied message. The messages log also includes this: dhclient: Can't bind to dhcp address: Address already in use dhclient: Please make sure there is no other dhcp server dhclient: running and that there's no entry for dhcp or dhclient: bootp in /etc/inetd.conf. Also make sure you dhclient: are not running HP JetAdmin software, which dhclient: includes a bootp server. In addition to the system generating these messages on its own, I can also prod it into generating them by uttering dhclient rl0 I'm not running HP JetAdmin software, and the dhclient setup is perfectly stock. I haven't installed any additional DHCP software. I'm not running a DHCP server. The only DHCP configuration I've done is in the rc.conf file: ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" I'm not using inetd. This has been a problem starting with FBSD 4.4 through 4.8. and with my current system, 5.2.1. I'll upgrade to 5.3 in a month or so when I have the time, but the problem seems to occur on all versions. I've searched the archives and Googled extensively, and I can find messages from other people with the same problem, but I haven't found a solution. It seems as though a second copy of dhclient is firing up and tryng to bind to port 68, and getting blocked by the existing copy of dhclient. Anybody have a clue what's going on, or why that would be happening? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 21:39:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8652116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:39:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FC043D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:39:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: from dialup84109-69.ip.peterstar.net ([84.204.109.69] helo=doom.homeunix.org) by voodoo.oberon.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CmfMD-0005SI-2t for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:39:50 +0100 Received: from doom.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j06LacVc001230 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:37:32 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (from igor@localhost) by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j06LaD5t001229 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:36:13 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igor) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:36:13 +0300 From: Igor Pokrovsky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050106213613.GA1208@doom.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: how to control DVD drive speed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:39:57 -0000 Hi all, Is there any utility to control DVD reading speed (probably in ports)? I used cdcontrol for CD drive, but it doesn't work with DVD. -ip -- The higher the level of prestige accorded the people behind the plan, the least less chance there is of abandoning it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 21:42:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F3016A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:42:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB84443D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:42:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@jwebmedia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (66.49.54.54.nw.nuvox.net [66.49.54.54]) j06LhFcH022804 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:43:16 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:42:31 -0600 From: "Joseph Koenig (jWeb)" To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Remote upgrade possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:42:35 -0000 I have a freebsd 4.9 system that I'd like to get upgraded to 4.10 and then soon to 4.11. However, the server is not physically in front of me, nor do I have physical access to it. Is it possible still to upgrade it, or do I need to physically get in front of the machine somehow? Thanks, Joe Koenig Production Manager jWeb New Media Design joe@jWebmedia.com http://www.jwebmedia.com/ 636.928.3162 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 22:16:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC57E16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:16:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41522.mail.yahoo.com (web41522.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.94.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64E7A43D67 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:16:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jim0266@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 62368 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jan 2005 22:16:39 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=LYxYq4Dbiwpk92og/ctxoNRSKUL4qtzCAIcIWxDl96QBYxHNWGbpjhQp6vqklZ2HXLjnV18l8ehsFWddeqVfFY4NSvXemvYQQMh9nrCm/Eeb4lqC9nxLWLGcIHM0yURnY7PTVZhdsabmIwdaAZEQr2weKcxAh5gaIes4l0k+XnM= ; Message-ID: <20050106221639.62366.qmail@web41522.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.93.161.48] by web41522.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:16:39 PST Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:16:39 -0800 (PST) From: Jim Arnold To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Installing Flashblock for Firefox in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:16:39 -0000 Has any gotten this extension to work on their FreeBSD version of Firefox and tell me how they did it? I installed in on my OS X box but it won't install on FreeBSD's Firefox. Thanks, Jim __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 22:18:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B85716A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:18:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A7A43D48 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:18:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j06MF33g020091 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:15:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DDB91C.5000600@vilot.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:18:04 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SCSI Hardware problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:18:06 -0000 This looks to me like I've got a hardware problem. SCSI drive 0:4:0 -- or is this perhaps something else? I had to manually type this in ... :) copying it off the screen since I don't see this stuff in a log anywhere. FreeBSD 5.3 on a dual 450MHz Xeon with SCSI and IDE. GENERIC kernel. There was stuff above this, but it had scrolled off the screen and the console was locked up. da1 (scsi 4 on bus 0) is my boot drive. ----------------------------------- <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): SCB 0x3 - timed out sg[0] - Addr 0x2574b000 (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Queuing a BDR SCB (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): no longer in timeout, status = 24a ahc1: Timedout SCBs already complete. Interrupts may not be functioning. (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a, 0 0 47 49 23 0 0 4 0 (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:29,1 (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Power on occurred (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Retrying Command (per sense Data) (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a, 0 0 47 49 23 0 0 4 0 (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): CAM Status: Check Condition (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:29,1 (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Power on occurred (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Retries Exhausted (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): lost device (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): invalidating pack panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started Uptime: 3d12h50m3s ----------------------------------- I'm guessing I will want to copy this entire drive over to another one. What's the best way .... dd? Oh, one other question ... I'm used to runlevels on Linux. When I reset this machine, I'm presented with the prompt asking me for the default shell (/bin/sh). I hit enter, and I'm in sh where I can fsck the other drives and mount them. Cool. But ....once I have done that, how do I tell BSD to basically "continue" where it left off (i.e. run /etc/netstart sshd, httpd, psqld, zope, etc) without manually invoking each of those items? Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 22:21:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF93616A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:21:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf15.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941B343D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:21:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.dyn.dhs.org) Received: from mxip18.cluster1.charter.net (mxip18a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.148])j06MLS6a008382 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:21:28 -0500 Received: from clarksville-24-159-63-245.midtn.chartertn.net (HELO [192.168.1.6]) (24.159.63.245) by mxip18.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2005 17:21:27 -0500 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.88,107,1102309200"; d="scan'208"; a="687322960:sNHT12941046" Message-ID: <41DDB2A7.8020001@wilderness.dyn.dhs.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:50:31 -0600 From: Laurence Sanford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041016 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph Koenig (jWeb)" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Remote upgrade possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:21:30 -0000 Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: >I have a freebsd 4.9 system that I'd like to get upgraded to 4.10 and then >soon to 4.11. However, the server is not physically in front of me, nor do I >have physical access to it. Is it possible still to upgrade it, or do I need >to physically get in front of the machine somehow? Thanks, > > > This is possible, however you are always taking a chance when you installworld without going to single user mode first. That said, I make a habit out of pushing my luck with systems I have in front of me by going so far as to make installworld while using an xterm in X-windows. That said, if you ssh in, and shut down as many things as you can (web servers, mail processes, etc) you should be fine doing this from a distance. The downside is, in the rare event that it does bomb, you're stuck until you can actually get to the box, or unless someone reasonably competent can get to it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 22:30:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D5F16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:30:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6978243D1F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:30:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2074394; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:30:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33450-08; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:30:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229154237; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:30:34 +0100 (CET) From: "Jorn Argelo" To: Tom Vilot , FreeBSD Questions Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:30:34 +0100 Message-Id: <20050106222541.M42982@wcborstel.nl> In-Reply-To: <41DDB91C.5000600@vilot.com> References: <41DDB91C.5000600@vilot.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 82.161.134.53 (jorn) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.wcborstel.nl Subject: Re: SCSI Hardware problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:30:03 -0000 On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:18:04 -0700, Tom Vilot wrote > This looks to me like I've got a hardware problem. SCSI drive 0:4:0 - > - or is this perhaps something else? > > I had to manually type this in ... :) copying it off the screen > since I don't see this stuff in a log anywhere. > > FreeBSD 5.3 on a dual 450MHz Xeon with SCSI and IDE. GENERIC kernel. > > There was stuff above this, but it had scrolled off the screen and > the console was locked up. > > da1 (scsi 4 on bus 0) is my boot drive. > > ----------------------------------- > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): SCB 0x3 - timed out > > sg[0] - Addr 0x2574b000 > > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Queuing a BDR SCB > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): no longer in timeout, status = 24a > ahc1: Timedout SCBs already complete. Interrupts may not be functioning. > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a, 0 0 47 49 23 0 0 4 0 > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:29,1 > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Power on occurred > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Retrying Command (per sense Data) > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a, 0 0 47 49 23 0 0 4 0 > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): CAM Status: Check Condition > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:29,1 > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Power on occurred > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Retries Exhausted > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): lost device > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): invalidating pack > panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started > Uptime: 3d12h50m3s Make sure your SCSI controller is supported by the driver you're using. If it is, it's probably a faulty disk. > > ----------------------------------- > > I'm guessing I will want to copy this entire drive over to another > one. What's the best way .... dd? Doesn't matter too much AFAIK. As long as you can access the disk properly. > > Oh, one other question ... > > I'm used to runlevels on Linux. When I reset this machine, I'm > presented with the prompt asking me for the default shell (/bin/sh). > I hit enter, and I'm in sh where I can fsck the other drives and > mount them. Cool. But ....once I have done that, how do I tell BSD > to basically "continue" where it left off (i.e. run /etc/netstart > sshd, httpd, psqld, zope, etc) without manually invoking each of > those items? I assume you boot in single user mode. I would just reboot the machine again and boot normally (multi-user mode) after you're finished with fsck and stuff. Cheers, Jorn > Thanks in advance. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 22:35:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A7F16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:35:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cobalt.antimatter.net (cobalt.antimatter.net [69.55.224.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC8E43D5A for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:35:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glenn@antimatter.net) Received: from glenn.antimatter.net ([10.1.6.3]) (authenticated bits=0)j06MM00F005943; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:22:01 -0800 X-MailKey: purple frogs are falling from the sky Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20050106143410.06f2aa18@cobalt.antimatter.net> X-Sender: lists@cobalt.antimatter.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:35:22 -0800 To: "Jorn Argelo" , Tom Vilot , FreeBSD Questions From: Glenn Dawson In-Reply-To: <20050106222541.M42982@wcborstel.nl> References: <41DDB91C.5000600@vilot.com> <20050106222541.M42982@wcborstel.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: SCSI Hardware problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:35:23 -0000 At 02:30 PM 1/6/2005, Jorn Argelo wrote: > > > > Oh, one other question ... > > > > I'm used to runlevels on Linux. When I reset this machine, I'm > > presented with the prompt asking me for the default shell (/bin/sh). > > I hit enter, and I'm in sh where I can fsck the other drives and > > mount them. Cool. But ....once I have done that, how do I tell BSD > > to basically "continue" where it left off (i.e. run /etc/netstart > > sshd, httpd, psqld, zope, etc) without manually invoking each of > > those items? > >I assume you boot in single user mode. I would just reboot the machine again >and boot normally (multi-user mode) after you're finished with fsck and stuff. Or you could just exit the shell and the system will continue to boot into multi-user mode. -Glenn >Cheers, > >Jorn > > > Thanks in advance. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 22:46:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761DC16A4CE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:46:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au (adsl-20-121.swiftdsl.com.au [218.214.20.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E1043D46; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jb@cimlogic.com.au) Received: by freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au (Postfix, from userid 102) id 7B7846A9BF; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:46:23 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:46:23 +1100 From: John Birrell To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Message-ID: <20050106224623.GA55403@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: FreeBSD mobile Mailing List Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:46:25 -0000 On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:52:43PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number > of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. > Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me > good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal > wireless card to work? I have an 1150 and it works great with RELENG_5 for me. I don't have the version with the internal wireless though. I use the bfe (Broadcom BCM4401) ethernet. No problems with that. If you get one, go straight to Dell's support site and get the latest bios. I had to do that before X would work. There have been a few bios updates and my 1150 was shipped with an out-dated bios which I thought lacked attention to detail by Dell when they build the machines to order in Malaysia. I got a CD R/W and DVD R and that works fine. USB2.0 ports function well as does sound. Whenever I watch videos, I choose to use the 1150 for that. Obviously the winmodem doesn't work with FreeBSD. That's the only device that isn't recognised during boot. Once thing I really like about it is being able to set the bios to boot via the ethernet port. That makes net-booting FreeBSD for driver development a breeze. I run RELENG_5 installed on the hard disk and net-boot to CURRENT. If I remember correctly, it took me about 10 minutes to get XP off it and FreeBSD on. -- John Birrell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 22:59:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1966216A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:59:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BF043D46 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:59:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j06MuIUw023459 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:56:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DDC2C7.6060402@vilot.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 15:59:19 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Podcast X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:59:21 -0000 For anyone interested ... I'm on the newest podcast con croncast: http://croncast.com/ along with Amy Gahran (contentious.com). :c) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 23:20:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0815A16A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:20:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from S3.cableone.net (smtp3.cableone.net [24.116.0.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2E343D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:20:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from fennec.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.123.89]) by S3.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S3) with ESMTP id 6594771 for multiple; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:35:11 -0700 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:20:01 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Joseph Koenig (jWeb)" Message-ID: <20050106152001.75c79b0d@fennec.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 36, in=70, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.123.89 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net cc: Joe Koenig cc: FreeBSD Mailing List cc: Henry Miller Subject: Re: Hardware or OS problem? System Crashing... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:20:06 -0000 On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:33:41 -0600 "Joseph Koenig (jWeb)" wrote: > >> On 1/5/2005 at 09:14 Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> We have a system that is currently giving us some trouble. The > >system> is > >>> FreeBSD 4.9. It's a 2 GHz system with 1MB RAM and (here's the > >kicker)> 73GB > >>> RAID 1 ATA drives. The system serves as a web/database server > >> dedicated to > >>> 1 > >>> site. Daily the system goes out and downloads real estate > >listings> (via > >>> shell scripts and cURL) and processes them (via PHP into MySQL). > >Also,>> nightly the system downloads a zipped set of images > >(probably around>> 400-500) and processes them into thumbnails (PHP > >scripts calling>> ImageMagick). Over the last week or two, the > >system is crashing and>> rebooting into single user mode. It's not > >consistently during updates,> or > >>> resizing of images, or anything like that. Yesterday, it crashed > >with> 99% > >>> processor idle and load averages of 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- I was > >watching a>> 'top' > >>> when the machine died. When it boots into single user mode, an > >fsck> must be > >>> run, which identified a few corrupt JPEG files -- however, the > >> sysadmin who > >>> reboots it never tells me which files they are. The sysadmin is > >> convinced > >>> it > >>> is a FreeBSD problem and says that Linux will not crash because > >of a>> corrupt > >>> file and if it does, will not boot into single user mode and he > >will> be > >>> able > >>> to access it remotely to do the fsck. About 3-4 weeks ago, one > >of the>> drives > >>> in the mirror set crashed and had to be replaced. I'm not > >convinced> that > >>> drives are not to blame for these issues. Is there any way to > >verify> that? > >>> Is it possible a corrupt JPEG on the drive could cause the > >system to> crash > >>> randomly? What can I do to correctly identify the problem so > >that we> can > >>> fix > >>> it and not change the OS? Thanks, > >> > >> The sysadmin has no clue about either linux or freebsd! > >> > >> A corrupt JPEG cannot cause a crash of the OS, for any real OS. > >(If it> does, it is a bug in the OS, but I doubt one exists) Real > >OS includes> Windows XP, linux, and FreeBSD. > >> > >> However, an OS crash can cause a corrupt JPEG! > >> > >> Either linux or FreeBSD may boot into single user mode when the > >> filesystem is corrupt. What your sysadmin means is that with > >one of> the newer filesystems Linux uses journeling, which is much > >less likely> to enter this situation, but it still can happen. > >With soft updates> FreeBSD is in the same situation as linux, but > >softupdates is> (generally, there are exceptions) better than > >journeling. There is> softupdates in Freebsd 4.9, but I'm not > >sure how to enable it, or how> good it is. (in 5.3 it is awesome!) > >> > >> I suspect hardware. > >> > >> I'd burn memtest to a CD, and run that for a few hours to see if > >> something is identified. Memtest won't catch everything, but it > >does> a pretty good job. > >> > >> Also look at other factors. Does the HVAC kick in when this > >happens?> Is someone hitting the panic stop switch? Situations > >like that have> happened, and they can take a while to debug. They > >are not likely, but> don't rule them out. > >> > >> FreeBSD 4.9 is fairly old at this point. You should seriously > >> consider upgrading to 4.11 (due out in a few weeks), or 5.3 (my > >> recommendation, but a much more involved upgrade). > >> > > > > In addition, to the original problem stated above, we are seeing a > > number of problems like "...in free(): warning: modified (page-) > > pointer" and "...in free(): warning: chunk is already free". I > > have them admin running a memtest today, but wanted to make sure > > these errors were not indicative of something else going on. > > Thanks, > > > > Well, the sysadmin tells me that memtest passed. Any one have any > suggestions as to what could be causing the crashes? Thanks, Don't trust memtest. I've seen it fail to identify faulty hardware in this area. FreeBSD does not crash because of bad files and I would be seriously suspect of the admin that is trying to feed you this. That and he does appear to be not concerned with it what so ever. Yeah, in 4x a major file system problem is a lot more likely to need fsck manually ran than on 5x. 5x will boot and run a back ground fsck. So you will still have network and ect. The best way to test drive is this... run lots of transactions across all parts of the disk for a rather nice amount of time. Smartmontools is also aviable in the ports. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/sysutils/smartmontools/pkg-descr I would be suspect of nearly any possible chuck of the hardware in that box. Since you've not listed any thing that would allow any piece of hardware to be ruled out as a problem regardless of the OS being used. The places I would focus my attentions are the PSU, RAM, CPU, mother board, cables, any PCI card or the like, and the drives them self. BTW you may want to check this out... http://www.freshports.org/graphics/ImageMagick/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 23:21:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE28116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:21:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700BF43D1D for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:21:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j06NI3Jq024448; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:18:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DDC7E0.9010006@vilot.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:21:04 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Dawson References: <41DDB91C.5000600@vilot.com> <20050106222541.M42982@wcborstel.nl> <6.0.0.22.2.20050106143410.06f2aa18@cobalt.antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20050106143410.06f2aa18@cobalt.antimatter.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: SCSI Hardware problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:21:08 -0000 Glenn Dawson wrote: > Or you could just exit the shell and the system will continue to boot > into multi-user mode. (( sigh )) It's always so much simpler than you think it is at first glance ..... Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 23:26:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1598F16A533; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:26:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C3A43D54; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:26:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id BC7698566C; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:56:07 +1030 (CST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:56:07 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: John Birrell Message-ID: <20050106232607.GI88329@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20050106224623.GA55403@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9s922KAXlWjPfK/Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050106224623.GA55403@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: FreeBSD mobile Mailing List Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:26:17 -0000 --9s922KAXlWjPfK/Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 7 January 2005 at 9:46:23 +1100, John Birrell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:52:43PM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> I'm thinking of buying a Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop. I have a number >> of Dells, and on the whole I'm happy, but I've had "issues" before. >> Can anybody who has one of these machines (1150 only, please) tell me >> good or bad things about it? Have you been able to get the internal >> wireless card to work? > > I have an 1150 and it works great with RELENG_5 for me. I don't have the > version with the internal wireless though. I use the bfe (Broadcom BCM4401) > ethernet. No problems with that. Thanks for the info. > If you get one, go straight to Dell's support site and get the > latest bios. I had to do that before X would work. There have been > a few bios updates and my 1150 was shipped with an out-dated bios > which I thought lacked attention to detail by Dell when they build > the machines to order in Malaysia. Interesting. I had a similar problem with my 5150 18 months ago (see http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2003.html#25 for details). Is this what you saw? > Once thing I really like about it is being able to set the bios to > boot via the ethernet port. That makes net-booting FreeBSD for > driver development a breeze. That sounds useful, indeed. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --9s922KAXlWjPfK/Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3ckPIubykFB6QiMRAhhTAKCtgBcGV09OGfLYC0wSyz/No5osOACgjYdB JGNdGpQBtXlHPys60HSKWiw= =DYs1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9s922KAXlWjPfK/Q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 23:29:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E55116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:29:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from epicentre.ru (epicentre.ru [195.206.50.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A353643D5A for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:29:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrachik@epicentre.ru) Received: from 195.46.118.22 (22.118.dial.irtel.ru [195.46.118.22]) by epicentre.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j06KZLWB056258 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:35:22 +1100 (MAGT) (envelope-from mrachik@epicentre.ru) From: Dmitry Sytirin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:28:35 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501070728.36144.mrachik@epicentre.ru> Subject: BIND9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mrachik@epicentre.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:29:22 -0000 Hi All! Question... OS - FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE I installed (from source) and configured bind-9.2.1 and i have this trouble: # nslookup ftp.my.com Server: myserv.local Address: 192.168.0.1 Name: ftp.my.com Address: 192.168.0.1 But!!!: # ping ftp.my.com ping: cannot resolve ftp.my.com: Unknown host Later I installed bind-9.2.3 from ports, trouble not disappear... :( For all that, such situation and with other servers (not my local). # nslookup freebsd.org Server: 195.xxx.xxx.xxx Address: 195.xxx.xxx.xxx Non-authoritative answer: Name: freebsd.org Address: 216.136.204.21 And: ping freebsd.org ping: cannot resolve freebsd.org: Unknown host What it is? Help me please!!! resolv.conf: nameserver 192.168.0.1 # Local, I revove it when connecting to internet... nameserver 195.xxx.xxx.xxx # Server at internet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 23:35:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA0716A4CF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:35:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D54343D4C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:35:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) j06NZdwZ017564 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:35:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000501c4f448$448954d0$0400a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:34:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: gnats installation/configuration howto FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:35:43 -0000 Hello, I'm looking for a gnats install and configuration procedure for FreeBSD. Googling has revealed a great many linux docs, but nothing for FreeBSD specific, looking for apache2 and 5.3 if possible. Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 23:42:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4456116A4CE for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:42:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from S4.cableone.net (smtp4.cableone.net [24.116.0.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC65343D45 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:42:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from fennec.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.123.89]) by S4.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S4) with ESMTP id 6486837 for multiple; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:50:53 -0700 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:40:12 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: Duane Winner Message-ID: <20050106154012.1665fc92@fennec.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <41DD5F25.3060101@att.net> References: <41DD5F25.3060101@att.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 61, in=45, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.123.89 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: xorg and xfree86 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:42:08 -0000 On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:54:13 -0500 Duane Winner wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anybody could provide me with a brief explanation > of why FreeBSD has made Xorg the default X11 implementation over > XFree86. > > It doesn't really matter to me, I've tried it, it seems to work > fine, and almost exactly the same. > > The only problem I've run into so far is is that my old XF86Config > file with the refresh rates for my external monitor connected to my > laptop didn't quite take (kept going to 800x600). After some minor > fiddling, I managed to get it working (I still need to do it again a > few times so I make sure I understand fully what I'm doing). > > I've read a bunch of docs, but can't seem to find an answer on why > FreeBSD has moved to Xorg. Is it just a political/licensing issue? > Like I said, it's not a big deal, but I manage the internal 'Howto' > document for our organization, and since we're in the process of > moving from 5.2.1 to 5.3, it would be nice to have a little mention > of why we're going to Xorg after my entire section for installing X > is going to change from Xfree86 instructions. Xorg beat XFree86 out in regards of features in the newest release. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 23:50:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC15E16A4CF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:50:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3411D43D60 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (hhdtsjxr@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j06Noi3S024938 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:50:45 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:50:54 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Marty Landman Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:50:59 -0000 Here's a picture of my situation. swamisalami# df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 128990 128988 -10316 109% / /dev/ad0s1f 257998 81790 155570 34% /tmp /dev/ad1s1e 2030062 926976 940682 50% /usr /dev/ad0s1e 257998 2090 235270 1% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc swamisalami# Does this mean that everything not on { /tmp, /usr, /var } is what's consuming too much space? Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:09:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC1B16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:09:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from amcuxfw803.amc.af.mil (amcuxfw803.amc.af.mil [131.9.254.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7472243D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:09:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.hauan@fairchild.af.mil) Received: from amcw2av802.amc.ds.af.mil (amcw2av802.amc.af.mil [131.9.19.115]) by fw3.amc.af.mil with SMTP id j0708vBh005221; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:09:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from AMCW2BH506.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.25.136]) M2005010618093319249 ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:09:33 -0600 Received: from amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.19.74]) by AMCW2BH506.amc.ds.af.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:09:33 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:09:32 -0600 Message-ID: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC6013BB085@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: clearing space Thread-Index: AcT0SqzeoVd9QI2GQTK1F5H4t9n5JwAAjDqA From: "Hauan David A" To: "Marty Landman" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2005 00:09:33.0279 (UTC) FILETIME=[2A506EF0:01C4F44D] Subject: RE: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:09:42 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Landman [mailto:MLandman@face2interface.com]=20 > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 3:51 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: clearing space >=20 >=20 > Here's a picture of my situation. >=20 > swamisalami# df > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 128990 128988 -10316 109% / > /dev/ad0s1f 257998 81790 155570 34% /tmp > /dev/ad1s1e 2030062 926976 940682 50% /usr > /dev/ad0s1e 257998 2090 235270 1% /var > procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc > swamisalami# >=20 > Does this mean that everything not on { /tmp, /usr, /var } is what's=20 > consuming too much space? >=20 Correct! I see this all the time. Do you log on as root a lot And save things to ~root? Have a look and move it off to usr Someplace. dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:12:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A8816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:12:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE3A43D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:12:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from [209.53.238.86] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CmhkH-000NAW-67; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:12:49 -0800 Message-ID: <41DDD401.4020701@ccstores.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:12:49 -0800 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (86) Subject: p5-GDBM on FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:12:49 -0000 I use "emu webmail", which requires p5-GDBM, and a "make" of this port on 5.3 reports: is marked as broken: Does not compile I've used it successfully on 4.3 thru 4.9, but now with 5.3 it's broke. This shortcoming is preventing my mail server migration to 5.3; Is there any way around this? Is it possible to re-compile perl to "include" GDBM natively? If so, how would I accomplish that? Thanks. -- Jim Pazarena From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:15:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0777816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:15:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from amcuxfw801.amc.af.mil (amcuxfw801.amc.af.mil [131.9.254.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFE543D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:15:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.hauan@fairchild.af.mil) Received: from amcw2av802.amc.ds.af.mil (amcw2av802.amc.af.mil [131.9.19.115]) by fw1.amc.af.mil with SMTP id j070FgQG000689; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:15:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from AMCW2BH505.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.25.136]) M2005010618154228672 ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:15:42 -0600 Received: from amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil ([131.9.19.74]) by AMCW2BH505.amc.ds.af.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:15:42 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:15:42 -0600 Message-ID: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC6013BB08B@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: clearing space Thread-Index: AcT0SqzeoVd9QI2GQTK1F5H4t9n5JwAAjDqAAABCAjA= From: "Hauan David A" To: "Hauan David A" , "Marty Landman" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2005 00:15:42.0728 (UTC) FILETIME=[0685E080:01C4F44E] Subject: RE: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:15:48 -0000 > > Here's a picture of my situation. > >=20 > > swamisalami# df > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/ad0s1a 128990 128988 -10316 109% / > > /dev/ad0s1f 257998 81790 155570 34% /tmp > > /dev/ad1s1e 2030062 926976 940682 50% /usr > > /dev/ad0s1e 257998 2090 235270 1% /var > > procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc > > swamisalami# > >=20 > > Does this mean that everything not on { /tmp, /usr, /var } is what's > > consuming too much space? > >=20 > Correct! > I see this all the time. > Do you log on as root a lot > And save things to ~root? > Have a look and move it off to usr > Someplace. >=20 > dave PS. Don't do your work as root. Use su or sudo=20 Or something. dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:17:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CB116A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:17:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.emmplus.ie (mail.emmplus.ie [66.154.97.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432E543D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:17:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jev@ecad.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.emmplus.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1870BA20EF for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:18:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.emmplus.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cohiba.emmplus.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86064-01 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:18:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (S0106000f3d4a81ef.vn.shawcable.net [24.86.11.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.emmplus.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9171CA20DA for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:18:55 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <41DDD510.7010704@ecad.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:17:20 -0800 From: Jev User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041229) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at emmplus.ie Subject: nic aggregation/teaming (AFT or similar) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:17:22 -0000 Hi all, I want to find out if there is any support for NIC teaming (AFT) in FreeBSD. I found this post from 2000 http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=8c72ap%24le4%241%40nnrp1.deja.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3D%2522FreeBSD%2520does%2520NOT%2520support%2520Cabletron%27s%2520SmartTrunking%2522%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN%26tab%3Dwg Has there been any developments with this? We are using AFT with dual intel nics for switch redundancy on Linux boxes. I really want to try and move to FreeBSD, and this is the only major issue that I can see. Any information is greatly appreciated, -Jev P.S. I'm not subscribed to questions, so please CC any replies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:17:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB34516A4DC for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:17:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046EA43D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:17:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (c-66-41-157-209.mn.client2.attbi.com [66.41.157.209]) (authenticated bits=0)j070HNEh033430; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:17:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: References: <06DDB71C-5DB4-11D9-B56F-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <8B357427-5DB7-11D9-89A5-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-1-48299076" Message-Id: <7B531D49-6041-11D9-8A15-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:17:14 -0600 To: "Colin J. Raven" X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on grog.secure-computing.net cc: Timothy Luoma cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: my lame attempt at a shell script... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:17:26 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1-48299076 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Ok all. First off, thanks again for all the help you've offered thus far. That being said, I'm having a problem with variables in a function. The code I'm having a problem with is: setup_loopback () { ${fwcmd} add ${rulenum1} pass all from any to any via lo0; ${rulenum1}=`expr $rulenum1 + 50` ${fwcmd} add ${rulenum1} deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8; ${rulenum1}=`expr $rulenum1 + 50` ${fwcmd} add ${rulenum1} deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any; ${rulenum1}=`expr $rulenum1 + 50` } The output of this, when run, is: 00050 allow ip from any to any via lo0 50=100: not found 00050 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 50=100: not found 00050 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 50=100: not found This tells me that it's doing the math correctly, but it's not reassigning the calculated value back to the variable. Any pointers? _______________________________________________________ Eric F Crist "I am so smart, S.M.R.T!" Secure Computing Networks -Homer J Simpson --Apple-Mail-1-48299076 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkHd1QoACgkQRAAY9knOW+qn8QCfYkcjHUZfrTOpOXFOMUebtW8M HE4AnjGnCTdJxfrSEUGvkAALoGTPH0Fr =bduo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-1-48299076-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:24:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0FE16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:24:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from helium.webpack.hosteurope.de (helium.webpack.hosteurope.de [217.115.142.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94ED43D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:24:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@hexren.net) Received: by helium.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.34 using asmtp helo=hexren.steenbuck.net) id 1CmhvE-0004Y0-1r; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:24:08 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:24:07 +0100 From: Hexren X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <65124647373.20050107012407@hexren.net> To: Jev In-Reply-To: <41DDD510.7010704@ecad.org> References: <41DDD510.7010704@ecad.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nic aggregation/teaming (AFT or similar) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hexren List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:24:10 -0000 J> Hi all, J> I want to find out if there is any support for NIC teaming (AFT) in J> FreeBSD. I found this post from 2000 J> http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=en&lr=&threadm=8c72ap%24le4%241%40nnrp1.deja.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fq%3D%2522FreeBSD%2520does%2520NOT%2520support%2520Cabletron%27s%2520SmartTrunking%2522%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN%26tab%3Dwg J> Has there been any developments with this? We are using AFT with dual J> intel nics for switch redundancy on Linux boxes. I really want to try J> and move to FreeBSD, and this is the only major issue that I can see. J> Any information is greatly appreciated, J> -Jev J> P.S. I'm not subscribed to questions, so please CC any replies. J> _______________________________________________ J> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list J> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions J> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------------------- Have a look at netgraph http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=netgraph&sektion=4&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+5.3-RELEASE+and+Ports I am not really shure if this is what you are looking for but maybe :) Hexren From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:28:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE5E16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:28:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rooster.chubbo.net (rooster.chubbo.net [168.75.98.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE73E43D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:28:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) Received: from rooster.chubbo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rooster.chubbo.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j070SbR5030054; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:28:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by rooster.chubbo.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id j070SbLR030053; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:28:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) X-Authentication-Warning: rooster.chubbo.net: nobody set sender to freebsd-questions@chubbo.net using -f Received: from c-67-169-93-71.client.comcast.net (c-67-169-93-71.client.comcast.net [67.169.93.71]) by mail.chubbo.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:28:37 -0800 Message-ID: <1105057717.41ddd7b57ac30@mail.chubbo.net> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:28:37 -0800 From: joseph kacmarcik To: Jev References: <41DDD510.7010704@ecad.org> In-Reply-To: <41DDD510.7010704@ecad.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nic aggregation/teaming (AFT or similar) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:28:53 -0000 > Has there been any developments with this? We are using AFT with dual > intel nics for switch redundancy on Linux boxes. I really want to try > and move to FreeBSD, and this is the only major issue that I can see. if you're looking for single-path redundancy and not increased throughput, you could use CARP (patches are here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/CARP/). the patches apply cleanly to 5.x, and seem to work just fine. if you need more information, check the list archives. good luck! joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:34:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E055B16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:34:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC2A43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:34:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (ahbjxq@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j070Vb3S027368; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:31:38 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106192851.02016c70@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:31:47 -0500 To: "Hauan David A" , From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC6013BB08B@amcw2ms517.amc.ds .af.mil> References: <59FD5336D1B1FA40AF6DDD241D8DBAC6013BB08B@amcw2ms517.amc.ds.af.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: RE: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:34:26 -0000 At 07:15 PM 1/6/2005, Hauan David A wrote: > > I see this all the time. > > Do you log on as root a lot I don't use the main console at all. I ssh in and then when I think it's needed su -. In this case what's happened is I want to install a Perl package, and assumed that I should run Perl's CPAN shell as root. Don't even want to explain the chain of events that got me to this point. :) Thanks David. Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:37:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2F016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:37:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3C543D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:37:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j070bHWJ080185 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:37:17 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-ZCK9fY7b27okGxykh9r3" Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:37:17 +0000 Message-Id: <1105058237.708.91.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: [Fwd: Re: question] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:37:13 -0000 --=-ZCK9fY7b27okGxykh9r3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit For google. --=-ZCK9fY7b27okGxykh9r3 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: Forwarded message - Re: question Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: Delivered-To: peter@circlesquared.com Received: (qmail 46292 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 20:29:31 -0000 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (64.233.170.193) by host217-45-219-81.in-addr.btopenworld.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 20:29:31 -0000 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a36so75531rnf for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:29:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=oxiMdYDM4WmZ1mhLKCI8CjjQwMCbbEPJtof9pDo4bDKsDsGYTXdqt91TaWeS9YPI6ZkOTEdYkZKwxb2v445uGL9OBpuvZd5ftURb91CzfeIrGdkpjdDX3OJBfddaXVsvnM2FmQOd00gV/BjVZ+3AU8zAGJPyXqW5jgXp39TmrhU= Received: by 10.38.164.76 with SMTP id m76mr48265rne; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 12:29:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.150.59 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:29:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:29:29 +0200 From: Ludwig Mey Reply-To: Ludwig Mey To: Peter Risdon Subject: Re: question In-Reply-To: <1105032730.708.81.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII References: <1105021643.708.51.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <1105032730.708.81.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hey thanks what i did wrong was... i was still compiling the kernel the old way. once i did it the new way, it worked like a bomb. thanks alot! Ludwig On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:32:10 +0000, Peter Risdon wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 19:11 +0200, Ludwig Mey wrote: > [top post moved down so the mail reads coherently. CC'd to list in case > anyone else has this problem in the future and tries googling for it] > > On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:27:23 +0000, Peter Risdon > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 16:13 +0200, Ludwig Mey wrote: > > > > hi > > > > > > > > my problem is as follows. > > > > > > > > i am trying to connect a Prolific Technology USB to serial connecter. > > > > but i am unable to get anything right after that. i have tried using > > > > minicom and pointing it to where the system is telling the device is. > > > > but no luck. any help will be appreciated. > > > > > > > > i am running FreeBSD 5.3 > > > > > > > > and the following information is given to me by the system when the > > > > device is plugged in. > > > > > > > > Jan 6 16:07:26 gogga kernel: ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. > > > > USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 > > > > > > I think you might need to compile a custom kernel with the added line: > > > > > > device ucom > > > > > > Then you should see something like: > > > > > > Jan 6 14:26:17 lorna kernel: ucom0: Prolific Technology Inc. USB-Serial > > > Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 > > > > > > when you plug it in. > > > > thx so far, but it didn't work. i added "device ucom" to my > > kernel,and recompiled but i still get the same response when attaching > > the device > > > > > > Jan 6 19:07:36 gogga kernel: ugen0: Prolific Technology Inc. > > USB-Serial Controller, rev 1.10/3.00, addr 2 > > > > anything else that i could possibly try? > > Well, I've got the exact same cable and it's detected properly on my > machine with this device in the kernel, as you can see from my earlier > post. Here's the full usb section from my kernel configuration file: > > # USB support > device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface > device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface > device usb # USB Bus (required) > #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices > device ugen # Generic > device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" > device ukbd # Keyboard > device ulpt # Printer > device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus > and da > device ums # Mouse > device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player > device uscanner # Scanners > device ucom > device uplcom > > I don't think you ought to require uplcom, but maybe it's worth a try. > > I have no idea how experienced a user you are, so apologise if this is > trying to teach you to suck eggs: are you sure you compiled your custom > kernel properly? I'm surprised the device isn't picked up correctly if > the ucom device is present in your kernel. > > Peter. > > --=-ZCK9fY7b27okGxykh9r3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:39:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3284516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:39:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEBE43D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:39:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9542187.dip.t-dialin.net [217.84.33.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AD02F625; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:39:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DDDA39.4060403@incubus.de> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:39:21 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dale@satoriseal.com References: <001701c4f41c$41429240$13a8a8c0@satoriseal.com> In-Reply-To: <001701c4f41c$41429240$13a8a8c0@satoriseal.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BASIC WEB SERVER HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:39:28 -0000 Satori Seal - Dale T. McGrosky wrote: > The web server program will be PARADOX as this computer will access data > through a Sonic wall firewall to our file server. > Will FreeBSD 5.3 be a good operating system for us that will provide > excellent security? From what I gathered from the web, it appears as if "PARADOX" is MS Windows-only software. Or am I mistaken here? mkb. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 00:45:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD01116A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:45:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cms-stl.com (smtp.cms-stl.com [192.94.149.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2AC43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:45:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from madden@cmsrtp.com) Message-ID: <41DDDB85.2030000@cmsrtp.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:44:53 -0600 From: Michael Madden Organization: Computerized Medical Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMS-Received: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:45:00 -0600, linus.cms-stl.com ([172.16.25.70]:45021) X-CMS-Authenticated-User: madden X-CMS-Archived: smtp.cms-stl.com X-CMS-Scanned: Sophos Anti-Virus X-CMS-Received: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:45:00 -0600, localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:40591 helo=lxmail.cms-stl.com) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: madden@cmsrtp.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on smtp.cms-stl.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Router setup with FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: madden@cmsrtp.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:45:01 -0000 Does anyone have documentation and/or a tutorial for setting a router with FreeBSD 5.3? I want to share a broadband connection with 5-10 Windows/Linux/FreeBSD boxes. I assume I'll need to setup the two interfaces, gatewaying, and some type of firewall... Thanks, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 01:00:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EE416A4CF for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:00:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C2643D68 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:00:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from [209.53.238.86] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CmiUi-000NwD-UE; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:00:48 -0800 Message-ID: <41DDDF40.4060705@ccstores.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:00:48 -0800 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (86) Subject: p5-GDBM on FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:00:49 -0000 I use "emu webmail", which requires p5-GDBM, and a "make" of this port on 5.3 reports: is marked as broken: Does not compile I've used it successfully on 4.3 thru 4.9, but now with 5.3 it's broke. This shortcoming is preventing my mail server migration to 5.3; Is there any way around this? Is it possible to re-compile perl to "include" GDBM natively? If so, how would I accomplish that? Thanks. -- Jim Pazarena From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 01:28:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6182F16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:28:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1225443D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:28:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j071Pai4041046; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:25:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DDE5C5.2050402@vilot.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:28:37 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric F Crist References: <06DDB71C-5DB4-11D9-B56F-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <8B357427-5DB7-11D9-89A5-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <7B531D49-6041-11D9-8A15-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> In-Reply-To: <7B531D49-6041-11D9-8A15-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "Colin J. Raven" cc: Timothy Luoma cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: my lame attempt at a shell script... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:28:40 -0000 Eric F Crist wrote: > > First off, thanks again for all the help you've offered thus far. > That being said, I'm having a problem with variables in a function. > The code I'm having a problem with is: > > setup_loopback () { > ${fwcmd} add ${rulenum1} pass all from any to any via lo0; > ${rulenum1}=`expr $rulenum1 + 50` > ${fwcmd} add ${rulenum1} deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8; > ${rulenum1}=`expr $rulenum1 + 50` > ${fwcmd} add ${rulenum1} deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any; > ${rulenum1}=`expr $rulenum1 + 50` > } > > The output of this, when run, is: > > 00050 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 50=100: not found > 00050 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 50=100: not found > 00050 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 50=100: not found > > This tells me that it's doing the math correctly, but it's not > reassigning the calculated value back to the variable. > > Any pointers? this is a very common mistake and is one of those things about sh and bash that drives me batty, too. You're thinking like perl. :c) Stripping it down to a test script, I have this: ----- rulenum=50 rulenum=`$rulenum + 50` echo $rulenum ---- I believe that is what you are after. When you *assign* you don't use $ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 01:30:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACC916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:30:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cloudy.stratum1.net (cloudy.stratum1.net [66.151.17.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497CF43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:30:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jlramirez@delnor.com) Received: from IS05 (adsl-68-20-209-175.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.20.209.175]) by cloudy.stratum1.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j06N5kSZ099003 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:05:47 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlramirez@delnor.com) Message-Id: <200501062305.j06N5kSZ099003@cloudy.stratum1.net> From: "Jeremy Ramirez" To: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:30:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcT0WHe17BST5Qd3Tdev/AWqvbS9fw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: libXft.so.2: ELF file OS ABI invalid HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:30:29 -0000 I am trying to install HPs Web Jetadmin for Fedora Core 2 on my FreeBSD system and am getting an error when running their self-extracting file. Unfortunately they only support Suse or Fedora Linux but would like to run it on BSD in compat. mode. /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: ELF file OS ABI invalid System Info: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC I have the Linux compat. Packages installed as well. I have the "libXft" package from the ports tree installed though have no intentions of running X on the box. Can anyone shed some light on what I'm overlooking. Many thanks in advance!! -Jeremy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 02:01:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8C016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:01:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from daffy.activeinvitesoftware.com (wbar2.sjo1-4-10-244-201.sjo1.dsl-verizon.net [4.10.244.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8654243D49 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:01:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rene.mendoza@activeinvitesoftware.com) Received: from [192.168.2.110] (unknown [210.213.171.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (verified OK)) by daffy.activeinvitesoftware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155BC64F7 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:22:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41DDEF7F.6070805@activeinvitesoftware.com> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:10:07 +0800 From: "Rene C. Mendoza" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20041109) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:01:59 -0000 I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3. I use cyrus-imap as well. What would you recommend? I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't know what to choose. thanks, Rene From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 02:09:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C969B16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:09:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340AC43D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:09:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (c-66-41-157-209.mn.client2.attbi.com [66.41.157.209]) (authenticated bits=0)j0729KZH035402; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:09:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: <41DDE5C5.2050402@vilot.com> References: <06DDB71C-5DB4-11D9-B56F-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <8B357427-5DB7-11D9-89A5-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <7B531D49-6041-11D9-8A15-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <41DDE5C5.2050402@vilot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-1-55017107" Message-Id: <1F964093-6051-11D9-90DC-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric F Crist Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:09:12 -0600 To: Tom Vilot X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on grog.secure-computing.net cc: "Colin J. Raven" cc: Timothy Luoma cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: my lame attempt at a shell script... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:09:22 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1-55017107 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On Jan 6, 2005, at 7:28 PM, Tom Vilot wrote: > Eric F Crist wrote: > >> >> First off, thanks again for all the help you've offered thus far. >> That being said, I'm having a problem with variables in a function. >> The code I'm having a problem with is: >> >> setup_loopback () { >> ${fwcmd} add ${rulenum1} pass all from any to any via lo0; >> ${rulenum1}=`expr $rulenum1 + 50` >> ${fwcmd} add ${rulenum1} deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8; >> ${rulenum1}=`expr $rulenum1 + 50` >> ${fwcmd} add ${rulenum1} deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any; >> ${rulenum1}=`expr $rulenum1 + 50` >> } >> >> The output of this, when run, is: >> >> 00050 allow ip from any to any via lo0 >> 50=100: not found >> 00050 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >> 50=100: not found >> 00050 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >> 50=100: not found >> >> This tells me that it's doing the math correctly, but it's not >> reassigning the calculated value back to the variable. >> >> Any pointers? > > > this is a very common mistake and is one of those things about sh and > bash that drives me batty, too. > > You're thinking like perl. :c) > > Stripping it down to a test script, I have this: > > ----- > rulenum=50 > > rulenum=`$rulenum + 50` > > echo $rulenum What is the point of the { } around some variables? _______________________________________________________ Eric F Crist "I am so smart, S.M.R.T!" Secure Computing Networks -Homer J Simpson --Apple-Mail-1-55017107 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkHd70gACgkQRAAY9knOW+pcIQCfV7cZgNH/q+FQiTQcyjkUn41o 53kAn2K/7QfxsMZeNM+Oqcduiv7ZbZer =YfaE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-1-55017107-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 02:17:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AA016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:17:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED23343D49 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:17:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A84375128D; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:18:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:18:26 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jeremy Ramirez Message-ID: <20050107021826.GA8443@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200501062305.j06N5kSZ099003@cloudy.stratum1.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501062305.j06N5kSZ099003@cloudy.stratum1.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libXft.so.2: ELF file OS ABI invalid HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:17:46 -0000 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:30:27PM -0600, Jeremy Ramirez wrote: > /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: ELF file OS ABI invalid >=20 > =20 >=20 > System Info: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 > root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >=20 > I have the Linux compat. Packages installed as well. >=20 > =20 >=20 > I have the "libXft" package from the ports tree installed though have no > intentions of running X on the box.=20 You need to install the linux-XFree860-libs port, which contains this linux library (you can't use FreeBSD libraries with linux binaries and vice versa). Kris --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3fFyWry0BWjoQKURAi1oAKDSMuzWKURf5hZVcrtqmGjW2gDZwQCg6ccn tpM0dIqa7l9QSj6ccICb9EA= =3J3c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 02:18:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A0716A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:18:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from e4500a.callatg.com (e4500a.atgi.net [216.174.194.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 043C043D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:18:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mopo@softhome.net) Received: (qmail 1295 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 02:18:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO micron.home.org) (216.210.171.117) by e4500a.atgi.net with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 02:18:39 -0000 Received: from liber (liber.home.org [192.168.1.100]) by micron.home.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820428237B for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:18:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by liber (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BB04D805D; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:18:39 -0800 (PST) From: Mo Po To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:18:38 -0800 Message-Id: <1105064318.5088.12.camel@liber> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Subject: atheros (ath) wifi driver problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:18:40 -0000 Hello, I installed FreeBSD 5.3 today (coming from linux/debian). I need to use the atheros wifi driver (man page ATH(4)), which is included in 5.3. (I have an atheros based PCI card in an athlon xp based system). I get the following error when loading the module ('kldload if_ath' command): ... ath0: could not map interrupt device_attach: ath0 attach returned 6 After that ifconfig fails tp 'up' the ath0 i/f ('does not exists'). The ATH(4) lists this error but just says it should never happen ;-) The same card/madwifi driver works under linux. Any help appreciated a lot - otherwise my FreeBSD venture will be rather short lived. Thanks a lot! -- Mo Po From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 02:25:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4845916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:25:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53805.mail.yahoo.com (web53805.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9F9543D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:25:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stigmata_blackangel@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 13285 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan 2005 02:25:53 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=RNQCBoYmNSk8QTeJ632EqGJKW7/5T4vZqWRg+bVtazghqxBY96vNpFp73To1NS7Bhq6PLHA+O4P7eYYa/8oFJbsyS0tjBpPG9ZtEjh3NTMEfPCUqtFnxgdSp4In2qhum65qE3qa6WE/HvJoMC0RcXfvISA8H+2tSr0iBuu7VhhI= ; Message-ID: <20050107022553.13283.qmail@web53805.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.9.155.250] by web53805.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:25:53 PST Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:25:53 -0800 (PST) From: Gregor Mosheh To: "Rene C. Mendoza" , freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <41DDEF7F.6070805@activeinvitesoftware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:25:54 -0000 Three companies I know of use Squirrel: my work, my friend's colo, and the last ISP where I worked. They're all very fond of it, as am I. It does require IMAP, but so does IMP. At my friend's colo he also tried IMP but decided against it because installation was more complicated than Squirrel. I wasn't part of that project, so I can't say what his issues were. --- "Rene C. Mendoza" wrote: > I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend > to my Postfix mail > server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3. I use > cyrus-imap as well. What > would you recommend? I've heard of Squirrel Mail > and IMP, but I don't > know what to choose. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do? http://my.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 02:34:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CBF16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:34:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kende.com (ns1.kende.com [66.17.131.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A9EF43D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:34:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andras@kende.com) Received: (qmail 72938 invoked by uid 0); 7 Jan 2005 02:35:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO a) (24.1.129.219) by ns1.kende.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 02:35:00 -0000 From: "Andras Kende" To: , Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:34:50 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <41DDDB85.2030000@cmsrtp.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-index: AcT0UjxWwdWxtfXHT7S9NZ11OuqEIAADyuPA Message-Id: <20050107023455.1A9EF43D4C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: Router setup with FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:34:55 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Michael Madden Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:45 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Router setup with FreeBSD 5.3 Does anyone have documentation and/or a tutorial for setting a router with FreeBSD 5.3? I want to share a broadband connection with 5-10 Windows/Linux/FreeBSD boxes. I assume I'll need to setup the two interfaces, gatewaying, and some type of firewall... Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello, Here is one: http://bsdguides.org/guides/freebsd/networking/ipfilter.php Andras Kende http://www.kende.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 02:37:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799CD16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:37:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40AD43D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:37:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4180DFE642; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:37:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DDF5F5.707@locolomo.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:37:41 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mo Po References: <1105064318.5088.12.camel@liber> In-Reply-To: <1105064318.5088.12.camel@liber> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atheros (ath) wifi driver problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:37:45 -0000 Mo Po wrote: > Hello, > > I installed FreeBSD 5.3 today (coming from linux/debian). > I need to use the atheros wifi driver (man page ATH(4)), which is > included in 5.3. (I have an atheros based PCI card in an athlon xp based > system). > > I get the following error when loading the module ('kldload if_ath' > command): > ... > ath0: could not map interrupt > device_attach: ath0 attach returned 6 > > After that ifconfig fails tp 'up' the ath0 i/f ('does not exists'). > > The ATH(4) lists this error but just says it should never happen ;-) > The same card/madwifi driver works under linux. > > Any help appreciated a lot - otherwise my FreeBSD venture will be rather > short lived. I think this problem or related has been noted before, but please submit some more info of what you do - copy/paste the command/output if you can. Try doing it all when the system is freshly booted, I wrote about some memory problems about a month ago if I tried to insert/configure my ath based card after starting memory heavy programs like mozilla. That problem has been resolved in 6.0 but the code may not yet have been merged into -STABLE. Cheers, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 03:03:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B5916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:03:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A036843D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:03:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@MHoerich.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Jan 2005 03:03:08 -0000 Received: from p508A5464.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO localhost) (80.138.84.100) by mail.gmx.net (mp005) with SMTP; 07 Jan 2005 04:03:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5114400 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:06:59 +0100 From: Mario Hoerich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050107030659.GA2673@Pandora.MHoerich.de> References: <20050106001935.GA29480@kender.sians.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050106001935.GA29480@kender.sians.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: University of Paderborn X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: tcsh, colorful prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:03:13 -0000 # Thanos Tsouanas: > I dont really care for the color of the prompt, but I would like > to see what i type (input) with a specific color. [...] > In short, i would like the color to end upon \n... I think you can do this with alias postcmd 'echo "[0m"' For the character, press ctrl-v and then esc (which inserts a ^[-character as literal). HTH, Mario -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 03:04:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96F416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:04:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6AC43D5C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:04:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so320666rne for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:04:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to:thread-index:x-mimeole:message-id; b=juXcMAFC1neBsj0FXuNV/PLpDPp+b5+QHczIQVHx8jvw8WSWOEpLHcog8PbLb6I72H9FV5fia4kcpefLkCwhUHGuuRhCbISr94CzvIN9vMIqYhtqpHXtyy/KuiDPh/n2Z04rR27D+Vn5zgCLUAxLfzhv2PEVae6SHeAED7ODXZ8= Received: by 10.38.74.60 with SMTP id w60mr320015rna; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:04:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix ([220.225.80.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 63sm64253rna.2005.01.06.19.04.00; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:04:02 -0800 (PST) From: "Subhro" To: "'Joseph Koenig (jWeb)'" , "'FreeBSD Mailing List'" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:33:51 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0030_01C4F493.9CDAEEA0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcT0OKzw84E0vFs6Ru6gbO8ahp/XHAALJ5HQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Message-ID: <41ddfc22.13e5dad9.1cc4.07bd@smtp.gmail.com> Subject: RE: Remote upgrade possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:04:04 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01C4F493.9CDAEEA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Koenig (jWeb) > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 3:13 > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: Remote upgrade possible? > > I have a freebsd 4.9 system that I'd like to get upgraded to 4.10 and then > soon to 4.11. However, the server is not physically in front of me, nor do > I > have physical access to it. Is it possible still to upgrade it, or do I > need > to physically get in front of the machine somehow? Thanks, > > Joe Koenig > Production Manager > jWeb New Media Design > joe@jWebmedia.com > http://www.jwebmedia.com/ > 636.928.3162 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" \ You can very well upgrade it although upgrading a server remotely over ssh or putty always has that extra bit of risk associated with it. I would not recommend it unless you are old hands at the business. Regards S. Indian Institute of Information Technology Subhro Sankha Kar Block AQ-13/1, Sector V Salt Lake City PIN 700091 India ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01C4F493.9CDAEEA0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJ4TCCAj0w ggGmAhEAzbp/VvDf5LxU/iKss3KqVTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFADBfMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUG A1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVibGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2Vy dGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwHhcNOTYwMTI5MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgwODAxMjM1OTU5WjBfMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVi bGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0A MIGJAoGBAOUZv22jVmEtmUhx9mfeuY3rt56GgAqRDvo4Ja9GiILlc6igmyRdDR/MZW4MsNBWhBiH mgabEKFz37RYOWtuwfYV1aioP6oSBo0xrH+wNNePNGeICc0UEeJORVZpH3gCgNrcR5EpuzbJY1zF 4Ncth3uhtzKwezC6Ki8xqu6jZ9rbAgMBAAEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQADgYEATD+4i8Zo3+5DMw5d 6abLB4RNejP/khv0Nq3YlSI2aBFsfELM85wuxAc/FLAPT/+Qknb54rxK6Y/NoIAK98Up8YIiXbix 3YEjo3slFUYweRb46gVLlH8dwhzI47f0EEA8E8NfH1PoSOSGtHuhNbB7Jbq4046rPzidADQAmPPR cZQwggNmMIICz6ADAgECAhANi0/uqtIYW/R1ap0p4X/7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAMF8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjE3MDUGA1UECxMuQ2xhc3MgMSBQdWJsaWMg UHJpbWFyeSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw05ODA1MTIwMDAwMDBaFw0wODA1MTIy MzU5NTlaMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1 c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNv cnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJ bmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC7WkSKBBa7Vf0DeootlE8VeDa4DUqyb5xUv7zodyqdufBou5XZMUFweoFL uUgTVi3HCOGEQqvAopKrRFyqQvCCDgLpL/vCO7u+yScKXbawNkIztW5UiE+HSr8Z2vkV6A+Hthzj zMaajn9qJJLj/OBluqexfu/J2zdqyErICQbkmQIDAQABo4G0MIGxMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIB BjA1BgNVHR8ELjAsMCqgKKAmhiRodHRwOi8vY3JsLnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9wY2ExLjEuMS5jcmww RwYDVR0gBEAwPjA8BgtghkgBhvhFAQcBATAtMCsGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29t L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBMA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8CAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AgUAA4GBAEJ8Dt+MeUysvwjsTVUvUImgxV5OLl6VMpt5rWURCxxKUsTVqDEhjt4Qm2wIxQfmA7nn yDR4CQnyvAZC+FqMg9GK3qoi9dnjIdLPZYwGM7DNILIzzQq9PuGdwTWpZLCnpSRb6fFo6xPEfDf0 lGQNmsW9MxfvgzOgPuWqPq7Ycx+tMIIEMjCCA5ugAwIBAgIQOo5O0s00DtVmctud5DTy6zANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQUFADCBzDEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNVBAsTFlZlcmlTaWdu IFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVwb3NpdG9yeS9SUEEg SW5jb3JwLiBCeSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxSDBGBgNVBAMTP1ZlcmlTaWduIENsYXNzIDEg Q0EgSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBTdWJzY3JpYmVyLVBlcnNvbmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDAeFw0wNDExMTEw MDAwMDBaFw0wNTA3MTgyMzU5NTlaMIIBEjEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNV BAsTFlZlcmlTaWduIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVw b3NpdG9yeS9SUEEgSW5jb3JwLiBieSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxHjAcBgNVBAsTFVBlcnNv bmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDE0MDIGA1UECxMrRGlnaXRhbCBJRCBDbGFzcyAxIC0gTWljcm9zb2Z0 IEZ1bGwgU2VydmljZTETMBEGA1UEAxQKU3ViaHJvIEthcjEjMCEGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYUc3ViaHJv LmthckBnbWFpbC5jb20wgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAKzp0P4Gh5arpymZu4cW FUb1gQ+qcJtb5B788xi2oskigeKdCgj9tiw5VdAW2rXoOO435Ch2mjBylJb49TFDfy636Fw0F5ij VuyIwtVQQANoiMICBZ8MIZyrBSK9/PyoHeITsnIoCucE4qYGkLL3CYzijoU/iZGwAS0iif7H2jJL AgMBAAGjgcswgcgwCQYDVR0TBAIwADBEBgNVHSAEPTA7MDkGC2CGSAGG+EUBBxcDMCowKAYIKwYB BQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgWgMB0GA1UdJQQW MBQGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDAjAUBgpghkgBhvhFAQYHBAYWBE5vbmUwMwYDVR0fBCwwKjAo oCagJIYiaHR0cDovL2NybC52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vY2xhc3MxLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOB gQBdijWu576noKjQbr0tQSROebsGab9JvR9rh3t9WagovURLjgi6zX/U6IxUSEXi4ECXtSZtEFpL 6yNUq+/mxEXvG7RX0Pe0T5iULmJxxrzO3Qvnc0UJJHKaYd5F4JD3c6YanGjwx3vDEfDQT8pzxHtb PXp6n18sFnbfiFG0ytSKPjGCBD4wggQ6AgEBMIHhMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5j LjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWdu LmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UE AxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3Qg VmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggKyMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzEL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA1MDEwNzAzMDM1MFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYE FKCf7xM4MyWy/PRNS1FqRi2NP+AlMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZI hvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIa MAoGCCqGSIb3DQIFMIHyBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgeQwgeEwgcwxFzAVBgNVBAoTDlZlcmlTaWduLCBJ bmMuMR8wHQYDVQQLExZWZXJpU2lnbiBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz13d3cudmVyaXNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBIEluY29ycC4gQnkgUmVmLixMSUFCLkxURChjKTk4MUgwRgYD VQQDEz9WZXJpU2lnbiBDbGFzcyAxIENBIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3Vic2NyaWJlci1QZXJzb25hIE5v dCBWYWxpZGF0ZWQCEDqOTtLNNA7VZnLbneQ08uswgfQGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYHkoIHhMIHMMRcw FQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4s TElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1 YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIGAJ2hM8/4XL/00ywLOnxuA5yhXrJt6oXlM+ztJpn89yn8eFrJ0oWZvfSHrBc7SysId V04hjnlr+Qqah4RJTYpw813xZaKFiTpe2ZLm9CIzgJgESwPNw6vz/fZmzL2CryODciFffO5vtYso l4AO71HbMC+Qe6H684fi+DuXf1vrhHMAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01C4F493.9CDAEEA0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 03:04:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEE816A4D0 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:04:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay103-dav10.bay103.hotmail.com [65.54.174.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBFE43D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:04:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whitevamp47@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:04:00 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.102.125.195 by BAY103-DAV10.phx.gbl with DAV; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:03:52 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [65.102.125.195] X-Originating-Email: [whitevamp47@hotmail.com] X-Sender: whitevamp47@hotmail.com From: "whitevamp" To: "Rene C. Mendoza" , "freebsd-questions" References: <41DDEF7F.6070805@activeinvitesoftware.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:03:36 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2005 03:04:00.0764 (UTC) FILETIME=[896BE3C0:01C4F465] Subject: Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:04:39 -0000 i use openwebmail i found it easer to setup then squarlmail ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene C. Mendoza" To: "freebsd-questions" Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:10 PM Subject: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. > I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail > server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3. I use cyrus-imap as well. What > would you recommend? I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't > know what to choose. > > thanks, > Rene > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 03:07:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99CB416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:07:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B12143D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:07:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so99652rne for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:07:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to:thread-index:x-mimeole:message-id; b=oYqC8Kn5RmWXuwnJQ9+C2h2CmI+n2ufIv2O6NRXlbf5XFaxnKJb2mzD2mVSwOrcdVx8WaWXQtuOGm8nrPEEGN+W4e06yo+GLDFVeK8UIdC7he+XxrTFAOHB/WsjBn/K9YIiq33xp+ncvD5SQDDcM9tNcllc+Z/OS/ocQD/LyV2s= Received: by 10.38.74.75 with SMTP id w75mr266035rna; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:07:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix ([220.225.80.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 79sm902350rna.2005.01.06.19.07.33; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:07:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Subhro" To: "'Tom Vilot'" , "'FreeBSD Questions'" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:37:25 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0037_01C4F494.1D442980" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <41DDB91C.5000600@vilot.com> Thread-Index: AcT0PapEn83w2KPxSD6sjxOR6xxHOQAJ/5og X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Message-ID: <41ddfcf7.57138333.5bba.470b@smtp.gmail.com> Subject: RE: SCSI Hardware problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:07:36 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01C4F494.1D442980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Tom Vilot > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 3:48 > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: SCSI Hardware problem? > > This looks to me like I've got a hardware problem. SCSI drive 0:4:0 -- > or is this perhaps something else? > > I had to manually type this in ... :) copying it off the screen since I > don't see this stuff in a log anywhere. > > FreeBSD 5.3 on a dual 450MHz Xeon with SCSI and IDE. GENERIC kernel. > > There was stuff above this, but it had scrolled off the screen and the > console was locked up. > > da1 (scsi 4 on bus 0) is my boot drive. > > ----------------------------------- > > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): SCB 0x3 - timed out > > sg[0] - Addr 0x2574b000 > > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Queuing a BDR SCB > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): no longer in timeout, status = 24a > ahc1: Timedout SCBs already complete. Interrupts may not be functioning. > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a, 0 0 47 49 23 0 0 4 0 > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:29,1 > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Power on occurred > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Retrying Command (per sense Data) > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a, 0 0 47 49 23 0 0 4 0 > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): CAM Status: Check Condition > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:29,1 > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Power on occurred > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): Retries Exhausted > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): lost device > (da1:ahc1:0:4:0): invalidating pack > panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started > Uptime: 3d12h50m3s Is the SCSI bus terminated properly. Changing LUNs help? > > ----------------------------------- > > I'm guessing I will want to copy this entire drive over to another one. > What's the best way .... dd? dd works only and only if the source drive and the target drive are *exact* clones of each other, which is not something seen very frequently. Why don't you use dump? > > Oh, one other question ... > > I'm used to runlevels on Linux. When I reset this machine, I'm presented > with the prompt asking me for the default shell (/bin/sh). I hit enter, > and I'm in sh where I can fsck the other drives and mount them. Cool. > But ....once I have done that, how do I tell BSD to basically "continue" > where it left off (i.e. run /etc/netstart sshd, httpd, psqld, zope, etc) > without manually invoking each of those items? Ctrl+D > Thanks in advance. Welcome :-) Regards S. Indian Institute of Information Technology Subhro Sankha Kar Block AQ-13/1, Sector V Salt Lake City PIN 700091 India ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01C4F494.1D442980 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJ4TCCAj0w ggGmAhEAzbp/VvDf5LxU/iKss3KqVTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFADBfMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUG A1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVibGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2Vy dGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwHhcNOTYwMTI5MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgwODAxMjM1OTU5WjBfMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVi bGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0A MIGJAoGBAOUZv22jVmEtmUhx9mfeuY3rt56GgAqRDvo4Ja9GiILlc6igmyRdDR/MZW4MsNBWhBiH mgabEKFz37RYOWtuwfYV1aioP6oSBo0xrH+wNNePNGeICc0UEeJORVZpH3gCgNrcR5EpuzbJY1zF 4Ncth3uhtzKwezC6Ki8xqu6jZ9rbAgMBAAEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQADgYEATD+4i8Zo3+5DMw5d 6abLB4RNejP/khv0Nq3YlSI2aBFsfELM85wuxAc/FLAPT/+Qknb54rxK6Y/NoIAK98Up8YIiXbix 3YEjo3slFUYweRb46gVLlH8dwhzI47f0EEA8E8NfH1PoSOSGtHuhNbB7Jbq4046rPzidADQAmPPR cZQwggNmMIICz6ADAgECAhANi0/uqtIYW/R1ap0p4X/7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAMF8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjE3MDUGA1UECxMuQ2xhc3MgMSBQdWJsaWMg UHJpbWFyeSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw05ODA1MTIwMDAwMDBaFw0wODA1MTIy MzU5NTlaMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1 c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNv cnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJ bmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC7WkSKBBa7Vf0DeootlE8VeDa4DUqyb5xUv7zodyqdufBou5XZMUFweoFL uUgTVi3HCOGEQqvAopKrRFyqQvCCDgLpL/vCO7u+yScKXbawNkIztW5UiE+HSr8Z2vkV6A+Hthzj zMaajn9qJJLj/OBluqexfu/J2zdqyErICQbkmQIDAQABo4G0MIGxMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIB BjA1BgNVHR8ELjAsMCqgKKAmhiRodHRwOi8vY3JsLnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9wY2ExLjEuMS5jcmww RwYDVR0gBEAwPjA8BgtghkgBhvhFAQcBATAtMCsGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29t L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBMA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8CAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AgUAA4GBAEJ8Dt+MeUysvwjsTVUvUImgxV5OLl6VMpt5rWURCxxKUsTVqDEhjt4Qm2wIxQfmA7nn yDR4CQnyvAZC+FqMg9GK3qoi9dnjIdLPZYwGM7DNILIzzQq9PuGdwTWpZLCnpSRb6fFo6xPEfDf0 lGQNmsW9MxfvgzOgPuWqPq7Ycx+tMIIEMjCCA5ugAwIBAgIQOo5O0s00DtVmctud5DTy6zANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQUFADCBzDEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNVBAsTFlZlcmlTaWdu IFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVwb3NpdG9yeS9SUEEg SW5jb3JwLiBCeSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxSDBGBgNVBAMTP1ZlcmlTaWduIENsYXNzIDEg Q0EgSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBTdWJzY3JpYmVyLVBlcnNvbmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDAeFw0wNDExMTEw MDAwMDBaFw0wNTA3MTgyMzU5NTlaMIIBEjEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNV BAsTFlZlcmlTaWduIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVw b3NpdG9yeS9SUEEgSW5jb3JwLiBieSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxHjAcBgNVBAsTFVBlcnNv bmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDE0MDIGA1UECxMrRGlnaXRhbCBJRCBDbGFzcyAxIC0gTWljcm9zb2Z0 IEZ1bGwgU2VydmljZTETMBEGA1UEAxQKU3ViaHJvIEthcjEjMCEGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYUc3ViaHJv LmthckBnbWFpbC5jb20wgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAKzp0P4Gh5arpymZu4cW FUb1gQ+qcJtb5B788xi2oskigeKdCgj9tiw5VdAW2rXoOO435Ch2mjBylJb49TFDfy636Fw0F5ij VuyIwtVQQANoiMICBZ8MIZyrBSK9/PyoHeITsnIoCucE4qYGkLL3CYzijoU/iZGwAS0iif7H2jJL AgMBAAGjgcswgcgwCQYDVR0TBAIwADBEBgNVHSAEPTA7MDkGC2CGSAGG+EUBBxcDMCowKAYIKwYB BQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgWgMB0GA1UdJQQW MBQGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDAjAUBgpghkgBhvhFAQYHBAYWBE5vbmUwMwYDVR0fBCwwKjAo oCagJIYiaHR0cDovL2NybC52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vY2xhc3MxLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOB gQBdijWu576noKjQbr0tQSROebsGab9JvR9rh3t9WagovURLjgi6zX/U6IxUSEXi4ECXtSZtEFpL 6yNUq+/mxEXvG7RX0Pe0T5iULmJxxrzO3Qvnc0UJJHKaYd5F4JD3c6YanGjwx3vDEfDQT8pzxHtb PXp6n18sFnbfiFG0ytSKPjGCBD4wggQ6AgEBMIHhMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5j LjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWdu LmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UE AxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3Qg VmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggKyMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzEL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA1MDEwNzAzMDcyNVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYE FE9ogrlEsTpJ3LY/YGyGn28rD9GVMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZI hvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIa MAoGCCqGSIb3DQIFMIHyBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgeQwgeEwgcwxFzAVBgNVBAoTDlZlcmlTaWduLCBJ bmMuMR8wHQYDVQQLExZWZXJpU2lnbiBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz13d3cudmVyaXNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBIEluY29ycC4gQnkgUmVmLixMSUFCLkxURChjKTk4MUgwRgYD VQQDEz9WZXJpU2lnbiBDbGFzcyAxIENBIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3Vic2NyaWJlci1QZXJzb25hIE5v dCBWYWxpZGF0ZWQCEDqOTtLNNA7VZnLbneQ08uswgfQGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYHkoIHhMIHMMRcw FQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4s TElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1 YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIGAF3uv1i3KMWtMuWN/KBOFnb8T0EP2FjiPKFVmdZYk4KEPW408e6smJ86tcMK55gtG xmtzDMoa4Z59JWvI8jZdCo6t3yQLIgpww3h8Rjt6+HfvWUPlGAlc2ICmbiRFJ9IMNfvo1PgEB6KP DGLbXjgx/XOGHLKtHx5ni8GY8v4WzJYAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01C4F494.1D442980-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 03:19:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D7516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:19:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cloudy.stratum1.net (cloudy.stratum1.net [66.151.17.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DE443D48 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:19:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jlramirez@delnor.com) Received: from IS05 (adsl-68-20-209-175.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.20.209.175]) by cloudy.stratum1.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j070skSZ099356; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:54:47 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlramirez@delnor.com) Message-Id: <200501070054.j070skSZ099356@cloudy.stratum1.net> From: "Jeremy Ramirez" To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:19:26 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050107021826.GA8443@xor.obsecurity.org> Thread-Index: AcT0Xx1sdPCi3O/FTBOq9AkSskpobAACHgGA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: libXft.so.2: ELF file OS ABI invalid HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:19:29 -0000 Thanks for the info, I was able to get past it.... Which library/port would have the following?: Extracting Files:............................................................... ./setup: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1: ELF file OS ABI invalid Install script failed I was able to find the two that came after the initial one, but now can't seem to find the GL library port for Linux... Thanks again!! -----Original Message----- From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@obsecurity.org] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 8:18 PM To: Jeremy L. Ramirez Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libXft.so.2: ELF file OS ABI invalid HELP On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 07:30:27PM -0600, Jeremy Ramirez wrote: > /usr/lib/libXft.so.2: ELF file OS ABI invalid > > > > System Info: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 > root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > > I have the Linux compat. Packages installed as well. > > > > I have the "libXft" package from the ports tree installed though have no > intentions of running X on the box. You need to install the linux-XFree860-libs port, which contains this linux library (you can't use FreeBSD libraries with linux binaries and vice versa). Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 03:21:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF10416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:21:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.wanadoo.fr (smtp1.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744B743D55 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:21:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id ABCA71C00228 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:21:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 794481C002A0 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:21:06 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050107032106496.794481C002A0@mwinf0101.wanadoo.fr Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:21:06 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <635409907.20050107042106@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050106152001.75c79b0d@fennec.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> References: <20050106152001.75c79b0d@fennec.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Hardware or OS problem? System Crashing... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:21:08 -0000 I had a very similar problem over the holidays. After a power failure over a month ago, I noticed some anomalies in FreeBSD, but they were very insidious and didn't seem like hardware (and the system was on a UPS plus a surge protector, so I didn't think the PF alone could have done damage, unless the power cycled many times over a short period). I'd get strange faults in programs from time to time, usually some type of memory faults--usually in Apache (since it uses most of the processor time), but sometimes in system programs that had never given trouble before. As time passed, the system would occasionally freeze, or I would even get kernel panics. There never seemed to be any information left behind that could help me find out why the system was crashing (fault type, processes running, etc.), and error messages in logs were scarce. (If there is a way to debug FreeBSD crashes without running a kernel specifically set up for the purpose, I'd like to know what it is.) Anyway, I suspected a virus--I had seen a virus infection on the Web server, but it had apparently never been activated because the firewall prevented it from "calling home." FreeBSD had never faulted before, so the OS was excluded (it would not _suddenly_ develop a bug). I reinstalled everything just to see. It wasn't until I reinstalled and upgraded to FreeBSD 5.3 and got even more frequent mystery crashes that I felt sure that hardware was causing a problem. It turned out that (I think) something had been damaged before or during the power failures. A motherboard failure earlier on had turned off the CPU fan. The fan worked, but the MB had stopped powering it, so it wasn't running. The AMD processor stayed cool enough to operate most of the time because the system is very lightly loaded processor-wise. However, at some point, something got the system into a tight loop, and the processor reached something above 120° C (around 300° F at one point, I think--I could _smell_ the system when I got into the room). Amazingly, it still ran most of the time, but I think some part of the virtual memory logic was damaged, because most of the mystery faults were segment violations. The problem very gradually got worse, with the OS faulting more and more often, until it eventually got so bad that it would fault before the bootload completed. I finally replaced the entire machine--this time with _seven_ fans, and with an Intel processor that will simply shut down if it gets too hot, instead of cooking itself to death. I also upgraded to FreeBSD 5.3, and I updated all the other system software as well. There have been no problems since ... except for a panic in sysinstall during the first installation, which I think was an honest-to-goodness OS bug (it happened only once, and reminded me vaguely of a similar problem on my first installation of 4.3, years earlier). The gigabit Ethernet on the MB doesn't work reliably under FreeBSD, though, so I just reinstalled the 100 Mbps card from the old server, which works perfectly. In summary, this was a hardware problem, but so subtle in the beginning that it wasn't at all clear that hardware was at fault--for a long time I suspected traces of a virus infection or something. Obviously, running Linux would not have made any difference. I did see filesystem corruption after the panics, which was to be expected, but as far as I know I never lost any actual data; fsck corrected the structure errors each time (sometimes from single-user mode, since it wouldn't always succeed in automatic checks). No OS can guarantee against data corruption on unreliable hardware, not even all-knowing, all-seeing Linux. Maybe you need a new sysadmin. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 03:48:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE3616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:48:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696D143D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D612F51297; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:48:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:48:42 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jeremy Ramirez Message-ID: <20050107034842.GA24982@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050107021826.GA8443@xor.obsecurity.org> <200501070054.j070skSZ099356@cloudy.stratum1.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501070054.j070skSZ099356@cloudy.stratum1.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: libXft.so.2: ELF file OS ABI invalid HELP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:48:01 -0000 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:19:26PM -0600, Jeremy Ramirez wrote: > Thanks for the info, I was able to get past it.... Which library/port wou= ld > have the following?: > Extracting > Files:............................................................... > ./setup: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libGL.so.1: ELF f= ile > OS ABI invalid > Install script failed >=20 > I was able to find the two that came after the initial one, but now can't > seem to find the GL library port for Linux...=20 linux_mesa. Kris P.S. Don't top-post. --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3gaaWry0BWjoQKURAo/2AKCpm0/tH/+KuBEOQZlWA7QAkt/UcwCgrzoG Yj51HdXUxqnIl+FTkOWslV4= =0vcf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 03:50:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C3616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:50:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from S2.cableone.net (smtp2.cableone.net [24.116.0.228]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFA543D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:50:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from fennec (unverified [24.119.123.89]) by S2.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S2) with ESMTP id 6690355 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:09:54 -0700 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:50:39 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Message-ID: <20050106195039.4f09ef6a@fennec> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.13 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 30, in=47, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.123.89 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Subject: slow sendmail starting on a lan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:50:38 -0000 Here I am running into is this... sendmail is taking for ever to start on a box. My main server has no problem, but this box takes a long time starting sendmail. Here are the related config files and ect for the box it is slow on. The only difference is a this one has a few less services enabled on it than server and the server has actual nameservers configured. This box uses a dns proxy/cache on the server for dns. Any ideas? /etc/hosts ::1 localhost localhost. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost. /etc/nsswitch.conf group: nis files hosts: nis files dns networks: files passwd: nis [unavail=continue] files shells: nis files ypcat of hosts 192.168.0.3 fennec fennec. 192.168.0.2 vixen42 vixen42. /etc/resolve.conf nameserver 192.168.0.2 /etc/rc.conf defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" hostname="fennec" ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" inetd_enable="YES" linux_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" nfs_client_enable="YES" nfs_server_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="NO" nis_client_enable="YES" rpcbind_enable="YES" nisdomainname="Vulpes" inetd_enable="YES" #lpd_enable="YES" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 03:56:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCB916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:56:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cms-stl.com (smtp.cms-stl.com [192.94.149.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFEA43D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:56:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from madden@cms-stl.com) Message-ID: <51296.192.168.2.2.1105070167.squirrel@new.host.name> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:56:07 -0600 (CST) From: To: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.7) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMS-Archived: smtp.cms-stl.com X-CMS-Scanned: Sophos Anti-Virus X-CMS-Received: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:56:08 -0600, localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:46820 helo=lxmail.cms-stl.com) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: madden@cms-stl.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on smtp.cms-stl.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: FreeBSD on Sun SPARC 20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:56:09 -0000 I've got a Sun SPARC 20 collecting dust, and I was wondering if any version of FreeBSD would run on my Sun SPARC 20? From what I can gather FreeBSD only works on UltraSPARC. Thanks again, MIke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 04:00:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A3316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:00:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4F443D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j073vgPa050962; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:57:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DE096C.3060903@vilot.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:00:44 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric F Crist References: <06DDB71C-5DB4-11D9-B56F-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <8B357427-5DB7-11D9-89A5-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <7B531D49-6041-11D9-8A15-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <41DDE5C5.2050402@vilot.com> <1F964093-6051-11D9-90DC-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> In-Reply-To: <1F964093-6051-11D9-90DC-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "Colin J. Raven" cc: Timothy Luoma cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: my lame attempt at a shell script... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 04:00:47 -0000 Eric F Crist wrote: > What is the point of the { } around some variables? It's not strictly necessary, except in some cases. i.e: m=34 echo $m You don't need it there. But you would want it here: f=/var/filename fname=${f//name/name2} It's when you need to differentiate the variable name from operations around it ... for want of a better explanation .... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 04:05:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E1516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:05:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DD643D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:05:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [192.168.214.216] (c-24-1-210-118.client.comcast.net[24.1.210.118]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005010704054501400gg57qe>; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:05:45 +0000 Message-ID: <41DE0A92.5070807@computer.org> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:05:38 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Vilot References: <20050105062243.GO53273@wantadilla.lemis.com> <41DC21DF.30801@computer.org> <41DC8FF5.9040001@vilot.com> <41DCD136.1080201@computer.org> <41DD765C.7030005@vilot.com> In-Reply-To: <41DD765C.7030005@vilot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Experience with Dell Inspiron 1150 laptop? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 04:05:46 -0000 Tom Vilot wrote: > Eric Schuele wrote: > >> I purchased mine from: >> http://www.pcdgloabl.com >> Which as luck would have it is within a mile of my office. So I just >> drove over there. >> > > Terrific. > > 1. Mis-type of the url: it is actually http://www.pcdglobal.com :) Yes.. thanks for correcting. > > 2. Which model do you have? The Mini-PCI 802.11b/g AR5004? I purchased the 802.11a/b/g AR5004:5213+5112. I have not been able to test the 802.11a... but b/g work just fine. For whatever reason (someone may be able to answer) the card is detected as 5212a/b/g by ath. Works fine so I'm happy. ath0: mem 0xfafe0000-0xfafeffff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci2 ath0: mac 5.9 phy 4.3 5ghz radio 3.6 ath0: Ethernet address: 00:00:00:00:00:00 ath0: 11a rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps ath0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps ath0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps The prices I was quoted when I purchased: Cost for the modules are: Part Number Description Qty Price T60H835.00 802.11a/b/g Mini - PCI Module 1 - 9 pcs $75.00 (Atheros:AR5213+AR5112) 40 pcs $55.00 T60H786.00 802.11b/g Mini - PCI Module 1 - 9 pcs $65.00 (Atheros:AR5213+AR2112) 40 pcs $45.00 They (Chris Bartlett) were nice enough to give me the 40pc price for a single. DO NOTE: They told me they do not do returns... also.. there was no packing. They reached into a closed with thousands of them... wrapped the miniPCI in bubble wrap and handed it to me. So there may be no docs/support or anything. They apparently sell to OEM. I didn't need anything but the card... so it didn't bother me. HTH > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 04:16:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E85716A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:16:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB07A43D53 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:16:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 38075 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 20:16:04 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 20:16:04 -0800 Message-ID: <41DE0CF7.6000209@taborandtashell.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:15:51 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rene C. Mendoza" References: <41DDEF7F.6070805@activeinvitesoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <41DDEF7F.6070805@activeinvitesoftware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 04:16:12 -0000 Rene C. Mendoza wrote: > I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail > server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3. I use cyrus-imap as well. What > would you recommend? I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't > know what to choose. > > thanks, > Rene I used IMP a few years ago, and I found it complicated to set up. I use SqWebMail now. SqWebMail may be less elegant than SquirrelMail, but SqWebMail is far more efficient. It is written in C, and accesses Maildirs locally, not through an IMAP server. If Postfix does not support Maildirs, you couldn't use SqWebMail. I have written a short tutorial on how to set up SqWebMail here (it is draft quality now): http://tabor.taborandtashell.net/serversetup/sqwebmail.html The installation is pretty straight forward (it is in ports), except the Makefile, which is a little confusing at first. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 04:26:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1AB16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:26:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA17A43D5E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:26:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 38094 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 20:26:36 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 20:26:36 -0800 Message-ID: <41DE0F6F.3040303@taborandtashell.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:26:23 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurence Sanford References: <41DDB2A7.8020001@wilderness.dyn.dhs.org> In-Reply-To: <41DDB2A7.8020001@wilderness.dyn.dhs.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "Joseph Koenig \(jWeb\)" cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Remote upgrade possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 04:26:44 -0000 Laurence Sanford wrote: > Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: > This is possible, however you are always taking a chance when you > installworld without going to single user mode first. That said, I make > a habit out of pushing my luck with systems I have in front of me by > going so far as to make installworld while using an xterm in X-windows. I routinely use 'portupgrade -rRN' in xterm, in X-Windows to install new ports on my box. The second to last time I did this, one of the ports what was upgraded was xterm. And it worked! Can anybody explain to my why nothing bad happened? Am I running a risk when I do this? -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 04:39:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9377316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:39:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whisk.dreamhost.com (whisk.dreamhost.com [205.196.208.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7442343D48 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:39:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (user-33qt99b.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.165.43]) by whisk.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB20175108; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:39:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <41DE096C.3060903@vilot.com> References: <06DDB71C-5DB4-11D9-B56F-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <8B357427-5DB7-11D9-89A5-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <7B531D49-6041-11D9-8A15-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <41DDE5C5.2050402@vilot.com> <1F964093-6051-11D9-90DC-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <41DE096C.3060903@vilot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <248793A4-6066-11D9-8BE8-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:39:39 -0500 To: Eric F Crist X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: my lame attempt at a shell script... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 04:39:41 -0000 On Jan 6, 2005, at 11:00 PM, Tom Vilot wrote: > Eric F Crist wrote: > >> What is the point of the { } around some variables? > > It's not strictly necessary, except in some cases. i.e: > > m=34 > echo $m > You don't need it there. > But you would want it here: > f=/var/filename > fname=${f//name/name2} > > It's when you need to differentiate the variable name from operations > around it ... for want of a better explanation a good explanation. When I'm being particularly fussy about a script, I'll use echo "${m}" just in case $m has some unexpected characters in it such as a space ! $ * etc which can really screw things up. TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 04:53:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B5916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:53:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D154143D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lucasreddinger@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so113071rne for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:53:31 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GvOsxd5eiek47yxGA+jsKcc1MPR14a0bu2AAHlILqfSpQAZGjngVbnOJkgpibc36X7OEAa/rQey9TKDhN8mDMHZ5tOfEk+6gkH1qgCKVOcxREO6uHmNA/Mwnd6ozvlB2fyD0Nj5DYUQzd265fTOmqltLF1GZmVQHLJER2eMoJP8= Received: by 10.38.72.27 with SMTP id u27mr244020rna; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:53:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.165.64 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:53:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:53:31 -0700 From: lucas reddinger To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: kernel make error in if_wi.o X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: lucas reddinger List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 04:53:32 -0000 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&m=101558914511003&w=2 I see the same problem in that post, however it was unanswered. I installed 5.3-R with 5.3-R kernel sources. During a make in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/PASSION: if_wi.o(.text+0x4150): In function `wi_set_cfg': : undefined reference to `ieee80211_cfgset' if_wi.o(.text+0x4e02): In function `wi_newstate': : undefined reference to `ieee80211_state_name' if_wi.o(.text+0x52c8): In function `wi_dump_pkt': : undefined reference to `ieee80211_dump_pkt' *** Error code 1 % cat PASSION machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident PASSION options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler options INET # InterNETworking options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options SCSI_DELAY=15000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extension s options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~128k to driver. options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~215k to driver. options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive. device apic # I/O APIC device isa device pci device fdc device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) device ch # SCSI media changers device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support device sc device agp # support several AGP chipsets device npx device pmtimer device cbb # cardbus (yenta) bridge device pccard # PC Card (16-bit) bus device cardbus # CardBus (32-bit) bus device ppc device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device ppi # Parallel port interface device device miibus # MII bus support device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. device sound device loop # Network loopback device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices device io # I/O device device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support device sl # Kernel SLIP device ppp # Kernel PPP device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) device md # Memory "disks" device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) device bpf # Berkeley packet filter device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) device ugen # Generic device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse device uscanner # Scanners If you need any other information, then please ask. Thanks in advance, Lucas Reddinger From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 05:24:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAD916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:24:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D67A43D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:24:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8DF9F51297; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:25:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:25:22 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: lucas reddinger Message-ID: <20050107052522.GA56608@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel make error in if_wi.o X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:24:46 -0000 --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:53:31PM -0700, lucas reddinger wrote: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Dfreebsd-questions&m=3D101558914511003&w= =3D2 >=20 > I see the same problem in that post, however it was unanswered. I > installed 5.3-R with 5.3-R kernel sources. During a make in > /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/PASSION: >=20 > if_wi.o(.text+0x4150): In function `wi_set_cfg': > : undefined reference to `ieee80211_cfgset' > if_wi.o(.text+0x4e02): In function `wi_newstate': > : undefined reference to `ieee80211_state_name' > if_wi.o(.text+0x52c8): In function `wi_dump_pkt': > : undefined reference to `ieee80211_dump_pkt' Your kernel is missing something mandatory. Go back to GENERIC or compare it to find out what you omitted. Kris --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3h1CWry0BWjoQKURAtnaAJ4+k0Mt9nC39Ao1xJRwtyVbLzOb0ACfemNz 6fV/Gmg0BR8R1UPIRcyEcsw= =EH+f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 05:36:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D915016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:36:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from galilee.polands.org (CPE-24-208-53-189.new.rr.com [24.208.53.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2EF43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:36:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from sheba.polands.org (sheba.polands.org [172.16.1.33]) by galilee.polands.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j075amRZ005643; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:36:49 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from sheba.polands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sheba.polands.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j075amtn000343; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:36:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from djp@sheba.polands.org) Received: (from djp@localhost) by sheba.polands.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j075amRf000342; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:36:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from djp) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:36:48 -0600 From: Doug Poland To: Mo Po Message-ID: <20050107053648.GA297@polands.org> References: <1105064318.5088.12.camel@liber> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1105064318.5088.12.camel@liber> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atheros (ath) wifi driver problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:36:51 -0000 On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:18:38PM -0800, Mo Po wrote: > Hello, > > I installed FreeBSD 5.3 today (coming from linux/debian). > I need to use the atheros wifi driver (man page ATH(4)), which is > included in 5.3. (I have an atheros based PCI card in an athlon xp based > system). > > I get the following error when loading the module ('kldload if_ath' > command): > ... > ath0: could not map interrupt > device_attach: ath0 attach returned 6 > > After that ifconfig fails tp 'up' the ath0 i/f ('does not exists'). > You may have already checked this, but be sure that "Plug and Play OS" is "NO" in your BIOS. I've seen weird things happen w/PCI cards when this BIOS setting is on. HTH -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 05:36:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51A916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:36:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-05-eri0.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-05.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3871543D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from afabian@austin.rr.com) Received: from turingmachine.mentalsiege.net (cs70112247-52.austin.rr.com [70.112.247.52])j075arPa023831; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:36:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from turingmachine.mentalsiege.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j075accT027144; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:36:38 -0600 Received: (from afabian@localhost)j075actH027143; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:36:38 -0600 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:36:38 -0600 From: afabian@austin.rr.com To: Marty Landman Message-ID: <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> Mail-Followup-To: Marty Landman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:36:58 -0000 On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:50:54PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > Here's a picture of my situation. > > swamisalami# df > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 128990 128988 -10316 109% / > > Does this mean that everything not on { /tmp, /usr, /var } is what's > consuming too much space? It does. You might want to try something like: du -x / | sort -rn | head -15 to figure out wheer your diskspace has gone. -- Adam Fabian (afabian@austin.rr.com) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 05:41:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2304016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:41:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9C643D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:41:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j075foj37417; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:41:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Rene C. Mendoza" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:41:50 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <41DDEF7F.6070805@activeinvitesoftware.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:41:59 -0000 Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard to setup. However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you have a very powerful front end mail system. IMP is what we use and if you want my notes from the last installation your welcome to them. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Rene C. Mendoza > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:10 PM > To: freebsd-questions > Subject: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. > > > I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail > server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3. I use cyrus-imap as well. What > would you recommend? I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't > know what to choose. > > thanks, > Rene > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 05:48:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF05C16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:48:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EAE743D55 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithcam@adelphia.net) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (really [68.169.225.230]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20050107054831.COJO5807.mta13.adelphia.net@[192.168.0.100]> for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:48:31 -0500 Message-ID: <41DE22AE.50101@adelphia.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:48:30 -0800 From: Kevin Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041221 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: how do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:48:32 -0000 How do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? As suggested in the FAQ, section 9, I am able to allow members of operator group mount the cdrom by setting sysctl -w vfs.usrmount=1 This does not appear to work with SCSI devices. (ex: /dev/da0s2) I get the error: > mount -t msdos /dev/da0s2 ~/ipod msdosfs: /dev/da0s2: Permission denied Any ideas ? -Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 05:55:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8111416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:55:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A9D43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:55:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9542187.dip.t-dialin.net [217.84.33.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010A82F690; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:55:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DE2457.20508@incubus.de> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:55:35 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Smith References: <41DE22AE.50101@adelphia.net> In-Reply-To: <41DE22AE.50101@adelphia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:55:39 -0000 Kevin Smith wrote: > How do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? > > As suggested in the FAQ, section 9, I am able to allow members of > operator group mount the cdrom by setting sysctl -w vfs.usrmount=1 > This does not appear to work with SCSI devices. (ex: /dev/da0s2) > I get the error: > > mount -t msdos /dev/da0s2 ~/ipod > msdosfs: /dev/da0s2: Permission denied the last time I was bitten by that issue, the mount point had to be owned by the user (group write access apparently isn't enough). that's a bit of a problem with things like gui mounters and I hope that that behaviour will be changed sometime in the future. at least I can't see any security problems with a user being able to mount over a mountpoint where he only has group write access. mkb. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 05:59:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D8316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:59:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B9E43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:59:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9542187.dip.t-dialin.net [217.84.33.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A432F66B; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:59:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DE2524.1030702@incubus.de> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:59:00 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: madden@cms-stl.com References: <51296.192.168.2.2.1105070167.squirrel@new.host.name> In-Reply-To: <51296.192.168.2.2.1105070167.squirrel@new.host.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Sun SPARC 20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:59:06 -0000 madden@cms-stl.com wrote: > I've got a Sun SPARC 20 collecting dust, and I was wondering if any > version of FreeBSD would run on my Sun SPARC 20? From what I can gather > FreeBSD only works on UltraSPARC. Maybe not FreeBSD but both NetBSD and Solaris work very well on the Sparc 20, and they're available for free. (Well, actually if your SS20 has more than one CPU, you'd have to get a commercial license for Solaris 9, and shouldn't use the free license, since that's only for one CPU but I mean, it's hardly stealing candies from little children, is it... and reportedly Solaris 10 will be "open source" anyways, so what.) mkb. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 06:26:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E61416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:26:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.pspl.co.in (smtp.persistent.co.in [202.54.11.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABED343D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:26:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from romil_shah@persistent.co.in) Received: from ps2204 ([10.44.50.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.pspl.co.in (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j076UERV030306 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:00:16 +0530 From: "Romil Shah" To: "Freebsd" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:58:20 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAQ= X-White-List-Member: TRUE Subject: pmap_enter Vs pmap_kenter_temporary X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:26:52 -0000 Hi, I am using older ver of FreeBSD RELEGN4 , my system has 2200S Adaptec RAID controller which uses aac driver and a swap device on raid disk. When kernel panics , the control passes to the aac_disk_dump() function under aac/aac_disk.c , where the dump get queued to controller . As i am using older RELEGN4 aac driver uses pamp_enter rather than pmap_kenter_temporary , on calling the aac_dump_enqueue va is passed i.e. return value of pmap_kenter_tmporary.(in new version) If i am not wrong than va hold the location of RAM from where data needs to be copied to swap device through the aac_dump_enqueue. :( I am using old version so i have pmap_enter which return void . Can you tell me the exact task that is done by pmap_enter Vs pmap_kenter_temporary. Can i use pmap_kenter_temporary in my older RELEGN4 (i cannot move to new RELEGN4) Thanks, Romil Shah From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 06:37:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEF016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:37:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from e4500a.callatg.com (e4500a.atgi.net [216.174.194.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD94643D58 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:37:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mopo@softhome.net) Received: (qmail 25766 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 06:37:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO micron.home.org) (216.210.171.117) by e4500a.atgi.net with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 06:37:37 -0000 Received: from liber (liber.home.org [192.168.1.100]) by micron.home.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161168237B; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:37:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by liber (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D99B9D805D; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:37:36 -0800 (PST) From: Mo Po To: Doug Poland In-Reply-To: <20050107053648.GA297@polands.org> References: <1105064318.5088.12.camel@liber> <20050107053648.GA297@polands.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:37:36 -0800 Message-Id: <1105079856.8367.10.camel@liber> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: atheros (ath) wifi driver problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:37:38 -0000 Doug, Thanks - I tried but did not help. The mobo is AN35N Ultra. The exact error is: kldload if_ath ath0: mem 0xe7000000-0xe700ffff irq 7 at device 8.0 on pci1 ath0: could not map interrupt device_attach: ath0 attach returned 6 I upgraded to something called RELENG_5 but it did not help (but now the onboard NVIDIA ether driver does not build ;-) I am running no GUI but command line only (yes I go back that long ago:-) On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 23:36 -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 06:18:38PM -0800, Mo Po wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I installed FreeBSD 5.3 today (coming from linux/debian). > > I need to use the atheros wifi driver (man page ATH(4)), which is > > included in 5.3. (I have an atheros based PCI card in an athlon xp based > > system). > > > > I get the following error when loading the module ('kldload if_ath' > > command): > > ... > > ath0: could not map interrupt > > device_attach: ath0 attach returned 6 > > > > After that ifconfig fails tp 'up' the ath0 i/f ('does not exists'). > > > You may have already checked this, but be sure that "Plug and Play OS" > is "NO" in your BIOS. I've seen weird things happen w/PCI cards > when this BIOS setting is on. HTH > -- Mo Po From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 06:38:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EAC16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:38:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004DB43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:38:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j076bqj37670; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:37:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "David Gerard" , "Paul Krill" , Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:37:52 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050106123456.GC2280@thingy.apana.org.au> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:38:00 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of David Gerard > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 4:35 AM > To: Paul Krill; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java > > > Ted Mittelstaedt (tedm@toybox.placo.com) [050106 06:29]: > > > It's of course quite legal for end users to download the JDK directly > > from Sun and compile it on FreeBSD themselves and then use it. > > > The main problem with this approach is that it requires a > ridiculous amount > of jumping through hoops - first you have to install the Linux > compatibility interface and libraries (20 megabyte download and a > reboot?), Are you sure your not talking about the BINARY distributions? I was referring the the source here: http://www.sun.com/software/communitysource/j2se/java2/download.html Only the Java Cryptography Extension is unavailable as source. More info is of course available on the FreeBSD Java mailing list. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 06:43:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB3916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:43:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4FA43D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:43:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithcam@adelphia.net) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (really [68.169.225.230]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20050107064348.VRGU1403.mta11.adelphia.net@[192.168.0.100]>; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:43:48 -0500 Message-ID: <41DE2FA3.4090500@adelphia.net> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:43:47 -0800 From: Kevin Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041221 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Buelow References: <41DE22AE.50101@adelphia.net> <41DE2457.20508@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <41DE2457.20508@incubus.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:43:49 -0000 Matthias Buelow wrote: > Kevin Smith wrote: > >> How do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? >> >> As suggested in the FAQ, section 9, I am able to allow members of >> operator group mount the cdrom by setting sysctl -w vfs.usrmount=1 >> This does not appear to work with SCSI devices. (ex: /dev/da0s2) >> I get the error: >> > mount -t msdos /dev/da0s2 ~/ipod >> msdosfs: /dev/da0s2: Permission denied > > > the last time I was bitten by that issue, the mount point had to be > owned by the user (group write access apparently isn't enough). > that's a bit of a problem with things like gui mounters and I hope > that that behaviour will be changed sometime in the future. at least > I can't see any security problems with a user being able to mount over > a mountpoint where he only has group write access. I thought that was the case, but I created a directory in the user's home directory (as that user) and used it as the mount point and it still does not permit it (see example above: ~/ipod is owned by the user). It works with the cdrom device though- i can mount that as a regular operator user. -K > > mkb. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 06:46:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D7C16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:46:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC6843D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:46:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j076k0j37715; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:46:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:46:00 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:46:02 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tm4528@aol.com > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:50 AM > To: tedm@toybox.placo.com > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD > > > Teddy, > > Its the most prevalent and popolar chipset on the market, Ted. At Strange then that none of my servers that run FreeBSD have this chip. Strange also that none of the developers have noticed this. I wonder if this is because I look at the hardware recommendations first - before buying hardware? Like on places like http://www.testdrive.hp.com/ where I can actually log into HP systems running FreeBSD and try it out myself? Nawwwwww! Is it possible that it's the most popular because it's the cheapest low-end chipset out there, fit only for desktop systems running the latest game from Id Software? Nawwwww! At least in the United States retailers are held to a 30 day warranty on products - if you buy one of these problematic motherboards and find that FreeBSD doesen't run on it, then take it back and get a different one. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 06:51:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE6416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:51:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18F943D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:51:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j076p9j37746; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:51:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:51:09 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <149.3c47467a.2f0eba4b@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:51:15 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tm4528@aol.com > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 7:59 AM > To: kris@obsecurity.org > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD > > > Well apparaently if someone asks nicely you ask them to donate > their hardware. Hmm - interesting theory there - all you have to do to get software customized for you is to ask nicely? Can we ask you nicely to go away? Will that work too? :-) > Why don't you answer the question, as to why the newest intel > chipsets are not > supported by 4.x, instead of bashing me? You dont have any answers. > Ah, the OP said that the newest Intel chipsets were not supported by FreeBSD FIVE, not FOUR. Don't forget the actual problem when your on a roll. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 07:10:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD2216A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:10:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (cromagnon.cullmail.com [67.33.58.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E36243D5E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:10:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (localhost.cullmail.com [127.0.0.1]) j0777uxY015890; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:07:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: by cromagnon.cullmail.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j0777uTI015889; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:07:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jamoore) From: Jay Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:07:54 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <20050102202051.GA7603@cmsrtp.com> <20050102203631.GA3765@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <1104699579.63517.14.camel@owl2> In-Reply-To: <1104699579.63517.14.camel@owl2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200501070107.54872.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> cc: Sergei Gnezdov Subject: Re: Recommended Mail Transfer Agent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:10:14 -0000 On Sunday 02 January 2005 02:59 pm, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > > Configuration is pretty easy with the m4 macros, and sendmail still > > amounts to something of a de-facto standard. > > I am not saying senmail is bad. In fact, I have no plans to get rid of > it. I just want to know where to find the information about sendmail > when I need it. > > Where do I go to learn about sendmail configuration? > Any HOWTO instructions? > Where do I send newbie questions to? In addition to the excellent advice already offered, I'll add the following: The "sendmail Cookbook" is a valuable addition to the sendmail book. http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/sendmailckbk/ Re questions: there is a sendmail newsgroup... I haven't used it on a while, but it was very active and responsive last time I checked. HTH, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 07:19:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA44D16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:19:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (cs.earlham.edu [159.28.230.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6572D43D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:19:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from [192.168.0.24] (CPE-67-48-232-40.new.rr.com [67.48.232.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j077J3c9050645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:19:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Message-ID: <41DE37E3.8020709@cs.earlham.edu> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:18:59 -0600 From: Skylar Thompson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: madden@cms-stl.com References: <51296.192.168.2.2.1105070167.squirrel@new.host.name> In-Reply-To: <51296.192.168.2.2.1105070167.squirrel@new.host.name> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig17E461A88A5128606EB43265" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on quark.cs.earlham.edu X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: skylar@cs.earlham.edu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Sun SPARC 20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:19:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig17E461A88A5128606EB43265 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit madden@cms-stl.com wrote: >I've got a Sun SPARC 20 collecting dust, and I was wondering if any >version of FreeBSD would run on my Sun SPARC 20? From what I can gather >FreeBSD only works on UltraSPARC. > > The SS20 isn't an UltraSPARC, so it won't be supported by FreeBSD's Sparc64 port. I've had good luck running NetBSD on an SS20, and IPCs and IPXs, though. -- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ --------------enig17E461A88A5128606EB43265 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB3jflsc4yyULgN4YRAqmiAJ42PVTtzSfQml+Xz+F1oPEDcvdx9gCfa0OI 1llIVCb7gUkesT/Wdm5jqtU= =yjFb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig17E461A88A5128606EB43265-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 07:34:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDD416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:34:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC7E43D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j077Ykj37875; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:34:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:34:46 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1f0.32a8aa14.2f0ee332@aol.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:34:49 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tm4528@aol.com > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 10:54 AM > To: tedm@toybox.placo.com > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD > > > In a message dated 1/6/05 2:10:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, > tedm@toybox.placo.com writes: > >> Do you really have no contacts at SM or Dell? What kind of a > development > >> org has no contacts with major vendors? > > > >It's not a question of not having contacts. It's a question of > >actually defining the problem in a way that a developer can get > >a fix on it. > > > >Currently, this is done with the PR mechanism on FreeBSD.org. Doing > >a search of this shows only PR i386/72579, which claims FreeBSD 4.X > >doesen't work at all on this chipset, which is contrary to what the > >OP was saying. > Thats NOT contrary to what anyone was saying (Im not sure who OP is). It surprises me that as you imply that you have been around the Internet for a long time that you don't know that OP stands for Original Poster. > You're just too busy writing people off as trolls to read whats > written. He > said it didnt work at all with the 7520 MB, No, the PR author said that 5.3 "works OK". He said that only 4.10 doesen't work with the NEW E7520 chipset but that 4.9 works with the OLD E7520 chipset. The implication is that 5.3 works fine on BOTH the NEW and the OLD chipset. Note also that the PR in question was filed OCTOBER 12 which was fully a MONTH before 5.3 was actually released. Thus the person filing the PR was running a BETA version of 5.3. > and he said his OLD 533Mhz > MB was faster in 4.9 than the new MB was in 5.3 so it made no sense > to upgrade. > Boris Spirialitious is the poster that said that, and he WASN'T the one who filed PR i386/72579. Boris did NOT say WHAT version of 5.3 he was running - was it RELEASE or an earlier beta? Nor did he post results of any testing program that showed a speed difference. > So, apparently, doing a PR doesnt work, since the PR you cited has > been largely ignored for 3 months. PR's that are NOT filed well are going to be ignored. Please, read the following: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/problem-reports/article. html Here's a list of things that both Boris and the PR author (and the person posting a followup to the PR) HAVEN'T done: 1) Boris hasn't posted a followup to the PR explaing what he's seeing. 2) Missing exact versions of FreeBSD in both cases 3) Missing model# of Boris's motherboard. 3a) Poster of followup to PR hasn't included model# of his board. He's also using a lame excuse for not running 5.3 but that's a side issue. 4) dmesg output from the 5.3 system that has the new E7520 chip and can't run 4.10 is missing 5) dmesg output from 4.9 system that has the old E7520 chip and CAN run 4.X is missing. 6) Identifying numbers off the E7520 chips or from the two machines BIOS are missing 7) No posting of whether 4.11 RC runs on the new chipset or not And overall in summary I have to say this - BOTH Boris and the author of this PR state that FreeBSD 5.3 runs on their motherboards, Boris says also that 4.10 runs on his MB, the PR author says that 4.10 doesen't run on ONE of his motherboards. The PR author didn't even say he was having a problem with this, or why he wanted to run 4.X instead of 5.3 - although considering the PR was filed about a month prior to the release of 5.3 I'll assume the PR author just didn't want to run beta code. Only one followup poster to the PR complained about having to run 5.3. And, Boris complained. The one followup post to the PR stated: "We cannot run 5.x as it is considered insecure." which is IMHO a big pile of baloney - who considers it insecure and why? And Boris hasn't posted any of his slowness complaint to this PR, so the PR lacks that. > So whats else do you recommend, Ted? > > PS: the 7520/7530 is required for use of Intel's newest CPUs, so its > not some random chipset. It should be way higher in the list of priorities > than the peripheral "fixes" noted for 4.11. Boris didn't say that 4.11 RC didn't work on his motherboard, he said 4.10 didn't work. How do you know 4.11 isn't going to work on this chipset when nobody has even tried it? Why the heck do you think the release team even bothers with RC releases to begin with? It's so people like Boris can post their showstopper bugs. Since that hasn't happened here, just a bunch of hand-waving bitching in -questions, why do you even bother asking why nothing is happening? This PR is kind of equivalent to someone posting "My Windows 2000 operating system doesen't work on my new SuperMicro motherboard and I want Microsoft to fix it" when the SuperMicro motherboard in question was designed and manufactured AFTER Windows 2K was released - although to the PR authors credit, he wasn't demanding that 4.10 be modified to work on his hardware. Perhaps we all should ask why it is OK for SuperMicro to release a motherboard that is incompatible with the existing FreeBSD versions? Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 07:37:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD1016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:37:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx-relay.gwtc.net (mx-relay.gwtc.net [64.251.160.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C8343D58 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:37:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Justin@rapidcity.net) Received: from killer (dsl1-208-34-11-112.sky.gwtc.net [208.34.11.112] (may be forged)) by mx-relay.gwtc.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id j077bGjh093157; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:37:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from Justin@rapidcity.net) Message-ID: <003101c4f48b$bd981a30$152ea8c0@killer> From: "Justin England" To: "Mike Tancsa" References: <059701c4f222$d7064a20$152ea8c0@killer> <6dbpt0t06d771k3sta0pvokdot017sqha0@4ax.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:37:28 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware Esclade 7006-2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:37:18 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Tancsa" To: "Justin England" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:19 PM Subject: Re: 3ware Esclade 7006-2 > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:01:31 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions > you wrote: >> >>I have downloaded the CLI util and the 3dm2 web interface from 3ware.com >>and have been trouble getting them to work. > > Its not totally obvious, but to connect to the 3dmd2, you need to talk > to it via https, not http. So if you have it on the default port of > 888, try > https://127.0.0.1 > and not > http://127.0.0.1 > Thanks for the tip... but still didn't work. I have set the port to 80, just to make sure it wasn't a browser issue, but it still doesn't work. Again, anybody have any success running the 3ware.com download of 3dm2 using a 7006-2 Esclade controller running the 5.3-RELEASE twe driver? Thanks, Justin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 07:37:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D080216A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:37:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (cromagnon.cullmail.com [67.33.58.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2FD43D49 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:37:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (localhost.cullmail.com [127.0.0.1]) j077ZfxY015980; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:35:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by cromagnon.cullmail.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j077ZfeQ015979; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:35:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jamoore) From: Jay Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Unreal HSHH Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:35:41 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <9b6b59500501042113452715b1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9b6b59500501042113452715b1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200501070135.41156.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Subject: Re: Howto check the hard disk bad sectors in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:37:59 -0000 On Tuesday 04 January 2005 11:13 pm, Unreal HSHH wrote: > > I have one harddisk installed in FreeBSD. > And I want to check if any bad sectors on it. > How can I do ? It seems the fsck can't do this. I'm not sure this can be done, but if you're looking for something to monitor the health of your drives there are a number of utilities available that use the "S.M.A.R.T." feature built into most current hard drives. In general, these utilities will help you predict failure of your HDD. Here's one such tool: http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ HTH, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 08:10:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D1816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:10:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (fia148-72.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.72.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EBA43D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:10:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl) Received: from localhost (colin@localhost) by kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j078Aha08149 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:10:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:10:42 +0100 From: "Colin J. Raven" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <659027645.20050106210412@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: References: <1761142680.20050104050725@wanadoo.fr> <040201c4f372$06d09210$92a7cb52@rekon> <015301c4f3e8$58464920$92a7cb52@rekon> <659027645.20050106210412@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Running top on system console without being logged on X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:10:46 -0000 On Jan 6 at 21:04, Anthony Atkielski launched this into the bitstream: > Reko Turja writes: > > RT> Actually not command line options as such, but you can make a login > RT> class for the top user in /etc/login.conf and feed the options via TOP > RT> environment variable from there. > RT> > RT> You cant shell out from top and renicing from non root account is > RT> impossible (except dropping the niceness of your own process). I think > RT> the approach is secure enough and if you give "topper" good enough > RT> password or deny logon from anywhere except from console, everything > RT> should be ok. Of course if the terminal is accessible to others than > RT> administrative staff, giving out the usernames can be a risk, but you > RT> can use the usernumbers option to avoid giving out the usernames. > RT> > RT> Did myself something very similar with a IPless firewall between a while > RT> back but I ran vmstat in the console instead. Good one glance monitoring > RT> without the need of logging on the machine itself. > > I created a special user that logs directly into top. I don't run > telnet or anything so login isn't possible from anywhere else, and it's > a plain user account with a good password. It seems to work pretty > well. > While masking the machine/LAN/location specific info, could you please post how you did this? What shell etc etc. I (for one) would be *most* grateful for this since (like many apparently) I'd like to do this too. Not mission critical in my case, but wildly cool if it could be done securely. Regards & TIA, -Colin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 08:10:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575D916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:10:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.martymac.com (martymac.com [82.224.94.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E284143D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:10:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganael.laplanche@martymac.com) Received: from martymac.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.martymac.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAD4FC; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:10:27 +0100 (CET) From: "Ganael Laplanche" To: Robert McHugh Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:10:26 +0000 Message-Id: <20050107080700.M84063@martymac.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 62.4.23.8 (martymac) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Asus K8N-E and slow disk transfer (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:10:48 -0000 Hi Rob, It runs well but you have to turn ACPI off at boot... Ganaël LAPLANCHE ganael.laplanche@martymac.com http://www.martymac.com Tel : (+33)6.84.03.57.24. ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Robert McHugh To: ganael.laplanche@martymac.com Sent: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:18:26 -0500 (EST) Subject: Asus K8N-E and slow disk transfer (fwd) > Hello Ganael, > > I have the same motherboard with two 160gb western digital sata disks. > I never ran any benchmarks on them, but the performance is nice. > > I was curious to know if you were able to get the amd64 release of FreeBSD > > 5.3 to run on your system. I tried many times but the install hangs when > it calls out to sysinstall. The 32 bit version runs fine. > > Thanks and good luck, > Rob > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:50:05 +0000 > From: Ganael Laplanche > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Asus K8N-E and slow disk transfer > > [This is a repost from the amd64 list] > > Hi all, > > I've just bought an ASUS K8N-E mobo. I'm using FreeBSD-5.3-Stable > (amd64) and suffering from *very* slow disk transfer rates. The > chipset is an nforce3 and is correctly detected at boot : > > # dmesg > [...] > atapci0: port > 0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 8.0 on pci > 0 [...] > > My disk is an UDMA100 one, everything seems to be correct : > # atacontrol mode 0 > Master = UDMA100 > Slave = BIOSPIO > > # sysctl -a > [...] > hw.ata.atapi_dma: 1 > hw.ata.ata_dma: 1 > [...] > > I use a new 80 lead ATA cable (shipped with my mobo)... Evrything > should be okay, but the whole system is very very slow. Copying a 600 > MB takes about 10 minutes (1 MB/sec) and makes the system nearly > unusable during the copy. > > Do you have any idea ? > > Ganaël LAPLANCHE > ganael.laplanche@martymac.com > http://www.martymac.com > Tel : (+33)6.84.03.57.24. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------- End of Original Message ------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 08:12:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D99E16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:12:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.martymac.com (martymac.com [82.224.94.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23DA43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:12:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ganael.laplanche@martymac.com) Received: from martymac.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.martymac.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C161F193; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:12:32 +0100 (CET) From: "Ganael Laplanche" To: "Jorn Argelo" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:12:32 +0000 Message-Id: <20050107081122.M33479@martymac.com> In-Reply-To: <20050106180304.M82599@wcborstel.nl> References: <20050106164506.M14496@martymac.com> <20050106180304.M82599@wcborstel.nl> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 62.4.23.8 (martymac) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: Re: Asus K8N-E and slow disk transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:12:53 -0000 Hi Jorn, It is set to "auto". I haven't tried to set it manually, maybe it's a good idea ! I'm gonna try this... Thanks, Ganaël LAPLANCHE ganael.laplanche@martymac.com http://www.martymac.com Tel : (+33)6.84.03.57.24. ---------- Original Message ----------- From: "Jorn Argelo" To: "Ganael Laplanche" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:05:16 +0100 Subject: Re: Asus K8N-E and slow disk transfer > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:50:05 +0000, Ganael Laplanche wrote > > [This is a repost from the amd64 list] > > > > Hi all, > > > > I've just bought an ASUS K8N-E mobo. I'm using FreeBSD-5.3-Stable > > (amd64) and suffering from *very* slow disk transfer rates. The > > chipset is an nforce3 and is correctly detected at boot : > > > > # dmesg > > [...] > > atapci0: port > > 0xffa0-0xffaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 8.0 on > > pci 0 [...] > > > > My disk is an UDMA100 one, everything seems to be correct : > > # atacontrol mode 0 > > Master = UDMA100 > > Slave = BIOSPIO > > Are you sure that the BIOS is using the correct PIO mode? You can try > setting it yourself though. However, I don't have too much experience > with that. I do know that the incorrect PIO mode can make your PC > extremely slow. > > Jorn > > > > > # sysctl -a > > [...] > > hw.ata.atapi_dma: 1 > > hw.ata.ata_dma: 1 > > [...] > > > > I use a new 80 lead ATA cable (shipped with my mobo)... Evrything > > should be okay, but the whole system is very very slow. Copying a > > 600 MB takes about 10 minutes (1 MB/sec) and makes the system nearly > > unusable during the copy. > > > > Do you have any idea ? > > > > Ganaël LAPLANCHE > > ganael.laplanche@martymac.com > > http://www.martymac.com > > Tel : (+33)6.84.03.57.24. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------- End of Original Message ------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 08:31:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA94A16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:31:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDD943D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:31:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2/d) with ESMTP id j078VbW7021547; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:31:37 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:31:37 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200501070831.j078VbPF021546@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:31:49 -0000 On Thu Jan 6 09:58:55 2005 Jerry McAllister wrote: >> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:10 -0700 Danny MacMillan >> wrote: >> >> >On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:35:43PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: >> >> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 Danny MacMillan >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >This is not intuitive, but you do not want to use the "make a >> >> >bootable CD" function of Sonic RecordNow! to make a bootable CD. >> >> >> >> On what basis is the above statement made if you haven't used >> >> Sonic RecordNow! ? It certainly looks to me as though the green >> >> button is the *only* way to burn an image (not counting making an >> >> exact copy of >> > >> >On the basis of your characterizing the little green button as being >> >"for making a bootable CD", and my understanding of that function in >> >alternative software. In short: I misunderstood. I apologize for >> >the misdirection. >> > >> Oh. That was because, if one places the cursor over the green >> button, a box appears temporarily bearing a line that says, "Click >> here to make this CD/DVD bootable". And, as noted in a different >> posting in this thread, that button brings up a browser panel for >> choosing an image file (but not displaying .iso files among the >> choices) to burn in making the bootable disk. > >Just an additional note for clarity: If I understand - and I don't >have the rest of the thread so I may be missing something - you want >to make a bootable CD of one of the ISO images. > >In that case, you do NOT want to use any of the options on your local >machine to create a bootable CD because the ISO image is already a >bootable image. It needs merely to be written raw to the media. > >When your utility asks if you want to create a bootable CD, it is >asking if you want it to add a boot record for it and the other pointers >to the file to make it bootable. Since the FreeeBSD ISO already has >that stuff in it, you don't want it done again. So, choose the options >that just write the data image directly to the CD with no additions. > No, no. This is wrong. You missed the explanation I posted regarding Sonic RecordNow!, as well as an earlier one by Robin Becker. The green button is the only way to tell the application that the file(s) it is to burn is/are image file(s), and it doesn't know that .iso files are a type of image file, so it doesn't list them in its browser unless you tell it to display *all* files in the chosen directory. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 08:32:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F03816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:32:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BAF43D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:32:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CmpXU-00085D-6r; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:32:08 +0100 Message-ID: <41DE4908.70708@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:32:08 +0100 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041124 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <41DC0714.2000408@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20050105190455.GA1566@xor.obsecurity.org> <41DD060A.6060501@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20050106191203.GA93129@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050106191203.GA93129@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > > >>>>I need to load the scsi stuff as modules, because otherwise i have to >>>>reboot after every change to the raid controller's configuration (which >>>>i am playing with ATM). Or is there another way to have the kernelrescan? ;) >>> >>>Kris >> >>Hi Kris, >> >>i tried 'camcontrol rescan all' but is the way to go.. > > > Surely not :( > > Kris [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cam_simq_alloc undefined X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:32:10 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:34:02AM +0100, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > > >>>>I need to load the scsi stuff as modules, because otherwise i have to >>>>reboot after every change to the raid controller's configuration (which >>>>i am playing with ATM). Or is there another way to have the kernel >>>>rescan the raid controller for disks? >>> >>> >>>camcontrol rescan? ;) >>> >>>Kris >> >>Hi Kris, >> >>i tried 'camcontrol rescan all' but it did not work. New drives were not >>recognized. Seems like reboot is the way to go.. > > > Surely not :( > > Kris What other options do i have then ??? Heinrich -- Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax : -3341 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 08:38:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBC516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:38:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D384B43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:38:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j078bcj38085; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:37:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Matthias Buelow" , Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:37:38 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <41DE2524.1030702@incubus.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD on Sun SPARC 20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:38:06 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Matthias Buelow > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:59 PM > To: madden@cms-stl.com > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Sun SPARC 20 > > > madden@cms-stl.com wrote: > > > I've got a Sun SPARC 20 collecting dust, and I was wondering if any > > version of FreeBSD would run on my Sun SPARC 20? From what I can gather > > FreeBSD only works on UltraSPARC. > > Maybe not FreeBSD but both NetBSD and Solaris work very well on the > Sparc 20, and they're available for free. (Well, actually if your SS20 > has more than one CPU, you'd have to get a commercial license for > Solaris 9, and shouldn't use the free license, since that's only for one > CPU but I mean, it's hardly stealing candies from little children, is > it... and reportedly Solaris 10 will be "open source" anyways, so what.) > Sun used to give out free licenses for up to 4 cpu's. He may have registered for one of these back when they were giving them out. Even if not the Solaris license nowadays is only a couple hundred bucks, much less than Microsoft XP Server. Also, with a Sparc 20 try to load a copy of Solaris 2.6 rather than a later copy, it will run faster and Sun still releases patches for it. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 08:53:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C32116A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:53:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.nordlines.ru (nordlines.ru [62.117.91.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22CD43D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:53:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alexeik@nordlines.ru) Received: from [62.117.91.253] (helo=[172.16.0.56]) by www.nordlines.ru with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (SMTP) id 1CmtYY-00068x-Uu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:49:30 +0000 Message-ID: <41DD8A3F.1040004@nordlines.ru> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 21:58:07 +0300 From: alexei kozlov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Question re: GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:53:09 -0000 Hello, Gurus. My fellow asked me if GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 supports 64bit memory pointers. He means is it possible to allocate *very* big (4GB and more) chunks of storage? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 09:00:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3244916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:00:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (fia148-72.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.72.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B6E43D54 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:00:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl) Received: from localhost (colin@localhost) by kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j078xu108572; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:00:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:59:56 +0100 From: "Colin J. Raven" To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:00:20 -0000 On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: > Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard > to setup. However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth > the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you > have a very powerful front end mail system. > > IMP is what we use and if you want my notes from the last installation > your welcome to them. > Like others, I'd heard of the installation difficulties you made reference to. I'm at something of a crossroads moment right now as it relates to webmail, so this thread is well timed. I *was* gonna simply install Squirrelmail since I know it and use it elsewhere. Now perhaps is the time to look at an alternative. I'd welcome your IMP installation notes! I *gather* (not in front of a FreeBSD box at this moment) that IMP is *not* in ports, otherwise (surely) installation wouldn't be *that* complex? Configging maybe, but install-wise ports 'apps just; "slide right in there" - usually :-) /me is keenly anticipating install notes!! Thanks for that Ted! Regards, -Colin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 09:20:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19DE16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:20:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AC543D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:20:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lucasreddinger@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r35so246677rna for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:20:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=IA8CfGuGEu6SjZfvOlU+EMq04clJFNBMXorcAapeCFxTTaCYPUz30I+87msNt+CN7QgmfxOG8cVqHx7ZhRFsYq14AK6uBHcvW/4leP6qJpSUgBqG4oJFW7crk86qdFepsVYqtx7Rt2Ci1i196oc7SodFrC3KG6GIR/sG6FyW0Po= Received: by 10.38.13.24 with SMTP id 24mr415027rnm; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 01:20:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.165.64 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:20:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:20:44 -0700 From: lucas reddinger To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050107052522.GA56608@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050107052522.GA56608@xor.obsecurity.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel make error in if_wi.o X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: lucas reddinger List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:20:46 -0000 in other words, 5.x has a generic 802.11b driver called wlan(4) that contains common infrastructure among the many wireless drivers. that's what i get for just switching from 4.x (i don't believe there was such a thing). thanks for the help. lucas reddinger On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:25:22 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:53:31PM -0700, lucas reddinger wrote: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&m=101558914511003&w=2 > > > > I see the same problem in that post, however it was unanswered. I > > installed 5.3-R with 5.3-R kernel sources. During a make in > > /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/PASSION: > > > > if_wi.o(.text+0x4150): In function `wi_set_cfg': > > : undefined reference to `ieee80211_cfgset' > > if_wi.o(.text+0x4e02): In function `wi_newstate': > > : undefined reference to `ieee80211_state_name' > > if_wi.o(.text+0x52c8): In function `wi_dump_pkt': > > : undefined reference to `ieee80211_dump_pkt' > > Your kernel is missing something mandatory. Go back to GENERIC or > compare it to find out what you omitted. > > Kris > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 09:25:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5A916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:25:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.pspl.co.in (smtp.persistent.co.in [202.54.11.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632B043D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:25:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from romil_shah@persistent.co.in) Received: from ps2204 ([10.44.50.29]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.pspl.co.in (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j079ScRV025603 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:58:40 +0530 From: "Romil Shah" To: "Freebsd" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:56:43 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAQ= X-White-List-Member: TRUE Subject: FW: pmap_enter Vs pmap_kenter_temporary X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:25:15 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Romil Shah Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 11:58 AM To: Freebsd Subject: pmap_enter Vs pmap_kenter_temporary Hi, I am using older ver of FreeBSD RELEGN4 , my system has 2200S Adaptec RAID controller which uses aac driver and a swap device on raid disk. When kernel panics , the control passes to the aac_disk_dump() function under aac/aac_disk.c , where the dump get queued to controller . As i am using older RELEGN4 aac driver uses pamp_enter rather than pmap_kenter_temporary , on calling the aac_dump_enqueue va is passed i.e. return value of pmap_kenter_tmporary.(in new version) If i am not wrong than va hold the location of RAM from where data needs to be copied to swap device through the aac_dump_enqueue. :( I am using old version so i have pmap_enter which return void . Can you tell me the exact task that is done by pmap_enter Vs pmap_kenter_temporary. Can i use pmap_kenter_temporary in my older RELEGN4 (i cannot move to new RELEGN4) Thanks, Romil Shah _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 09:34:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A034016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:34:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (wcborstel.demon.nl [82.161.134.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4AC43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:34:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jorn@wcborstel.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8B54398; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:34:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.wcborstel.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43453-01; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:34:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.wcborstel.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.wcborstel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC4F4216; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:34:35 +0100 (CET) From: "Jorn Argelo" To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , "Rene C. Mendoza" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:34:35 +0100 Message-Id: <20050107093147.M19076@wcborstel.nl> In-Reply-To: References: <41DDEF7F.6070805@activeinvitesoftware.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.41 20040926 X-OriginatingIP: 82.161.134.53 (jorn) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.wcborstel.nl Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:34:01 -0000 On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:41:50 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote > Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard > to setup. However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth > the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you > have a very powerful front end mail system. True enough, but I never managed to get it up and running. It's a very nice suite indeed, if you can get it running. I'm using Open Webmail. A powerful webmail client based on Neomail. It uses speedycgi, and requires suid to be compiled in your perl enviroment. You probably have to recomple perl, but it's still alot easier then IMP. Jorn. > > IMP is what we use and if you want my notes from the last > installation your welcome to them. > > Ted > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Rene C. Mendoza > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:10 PM > > To: freebsd-questions > > Subject: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. > > > > > > I'm in the process of looking for a webmail frontend to my Postfix mail > > server setup installed on FreeBSD 5.3. I use cyrus-imap as well. What > > would you recommend? I've heard of Squirrel Mail and IMP, but I don't > > know what to choose. > > > > thanks, > > Rene > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 09:41:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BDF16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:41:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7229543D5C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:41:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j079f9Zw081722; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:41:09 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: "Colin J. Raven" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:41:09 +0000 Message-Id: <1105090869.708.113.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:41:18 -0000 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: > On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: > > > Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard > > to setup. However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth > > the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you > > have a very powerful front end mail system. > > > > IMP is what we use and if you want my notes from the last installation > > your welcome to them. > > > > Like others, I'd heard of the installation difficulties you made > reference to. I'm at something of a crossroads moment right now as it > relates to webmail, so this thread is well timed. I *was* gonna simply > install Squirrelmail since I know it and use it elsewhere. Now perhaps > is the time to look at an alternative. I'd welcome your IMP installation > notes! > > I *gather* (not in front of a FreeBSD box at this moment) that IMP is > *not* in ports, otherwise (surely) installation wouldn't be *that* > complex? Configging maybe, but install-wise ports 'apps just; "slide > right in there" - usually :-) I'm baffled by all this. IMP is easy to install and set up. It is in the ports tree, together with several other useful horde components: >From /usr/ports/www/horde2/pkg-descr: Horde is used by these ports: mail/imp3, mail/turba, devel/chora, deskutils/kronolith, deskutils/nag, www/jonah, net/nic, devel/whups, and deskutils/mnemo Horde applications have an intuitive folder structure, clearly identified config files and, the dozen or so times I've had to set this up, it's always just worked first time. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 09:45:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4EC16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:45:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay16-f1.bay16.hotmail.com [65.54.186.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0085743D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:45:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjn0211@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:45:01 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 202.183.248.166 by by16fd.bay16.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:44:02 GMT X-Originating-IP: [202.183.248.166] X-Originating-Email: [pjn0211@hotmail.com] X-Sender: pjn0211@hotmail.com From: "Supote Leelasupphakorn" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:44:02 +0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2005 09:45:01.0227 (UTC) FILETIME=[8E932FB0:01C4F49D] Subject: Able to mount samba but it's empty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:45:02 -0000 Hi all, I'm using 4.8-RELEASE-p15 and Samba-2.2.8a for mounting shared directory on Windows2000 (NTFS). So far the disk on Windows2000 is only 120 GB and mounting is successful. But after I changed a disk to 200GB, I can sucessfully mount both 120GB and 200GB (I mean no any error message are displayed) but I can't see any file in the mount point of 200GB disk. I googled for a while but no any answer useful. Is there any problem with 200 GB disk on Samba-2.2.8 OR it's time to upgraded the Samba's version OR I missed something ? TIA pjn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 10:09:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB45A16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:09:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 9.hellooperator.net (cpc3-cdif2-3-0-cust202.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.32.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68E743D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:09:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputin@hellooperator.net) Received: from rasputin by 9.hellooperator.net with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Cmr3m-0006Xt-WD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:09:35 +0000 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:09:34 +0000 From: Dick Davies To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20050107100934.GM12003@lb.tenfour> References: <1f0.32a8aa14.2f0ee332@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Dick Davies Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:09:37 -0000 * Ted Mittelstaedt [0135 07:35]: > .... Perhaps we all should ask why it is OK for SuperMicro to release > a > motherboard that is incompatible with the existing FreeBSD versions? Because they hate our freedom, of course... -- 'One cannot make an omelette without breaking eggs -- but it is amazing how many eggs one can break without making a decent omelette.' -- Charles P. Issawi Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 10:12:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967D816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:12:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (fia148-72.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.72.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F19F43D48 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:12:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl) Received: from localhost (colin@localhost) by kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j07ACVg09164; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:12:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:12:31 +0100 From: "Colin J. Raven" To: Peter Risdon In-Reply-To: <1105090869.708.113.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Message-ID: References: <1105090869.708.113.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:12:49 -0000 On Jan 7 at 09:41, Peter Risdon launched this into the bitstream: > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: >> On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: >> >>> Use IMP. Of course, some people pooh-pooh it saying it's hard >>> to setup. However, IMP is one of those programs that is worth >>> the effort, as if you install the entire suite of programs you >>> have a very powerful front end mail system. >>> >> >> I *gather* (not in front of a FreeBSD box at this moment) that IMP is >> *not* in ports, otherwise (surely) installation wouldn't be *that* >> complex? Configging maybe, but install-wise ports 'apps just; "slide >> right in there" - usually :-) > > I'm baffled by all this. IMP is easy to install and set up. It is in the > ports tree, together with several other useful horde components: > >> From /usr/ports/www/horde2/pkg-descr: > > Horde is used by these ports: mail/imp3, mail/turba, devel/chora, > deskutils/kronolith, deskutils/nag, www/jonah, net/nic, devel/whups, > and deskutils/mnemo > > Horde applications have an intuitive folder structure, clearly > identified config files and, the dozen or so times I've had to set this > up, it's always just worked first time. > I think the difficulties arise where there is no application distribution mechanism such as ports. Now you mention it, I seem to recall a shedload of issues if you had to download the source and build it by hand. There were definite gotchas in that process I believe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 10:16:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A85416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:16:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E51D43D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:16:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j07AGi38081819; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:16:44 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: "Colin J. Raven" In-Reply-To: References: <1105090869.708.113.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:16:44 +0000 Message-Id: <1105093004.708.115.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:16:42 -0000 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 11:12 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: > On Jan 7 at 09:41, Peter Risdon launched this into the bitstream: > > > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: > >> On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: > >> > >>> Use IMP. [...] > > Now you mention it, I seem to recall a shedload of issues if you had to > download the source and build it by hand. There were definite gotchas in > that process I believe. > > How so? It's PHP. There's nothing to build. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 10:17:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98FC16A4CF for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:17:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.computerking.ca (computerking.ca [68.146.204.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6614543D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:17:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maillist@computerking.ca) Received: from mail1.computerking.ca (localhost.computerking.ca [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.computerking.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BAA363 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:17:30 -0700 (MST) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (v22001.computerking.ca [192.168.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail1.computerking.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03BC366 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 03:17:29 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <41DE61A1.7020802@computerking.ca> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:17:05 -0700 From: RYAN vAN GINNEKEN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: failover for http X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:17:07 -0000 Does anyone know of a good package or howto that covers the failover topic?? I have found lots of stuff on google but hard to know if these progs do what i need. There has to be something in the ports that archive this spread with wackmole maybe seems very complex and not even sure it will suit my needs??? I have 2 server in different locations with different ip's is it possible to have these servers back each other up? I have read ip on the cheap from the Unix hacks book but it does not seem to cover the different location and ip issue. Please a point in the right direction would be great. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 10:37:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F65616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:37:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA4043D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:37:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j07AbCf6023964 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:37:12 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j07AbB7j023961; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:37:11 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:37:11 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200501071037.j07AbB7j023961@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: Freeze in boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:37:15 -0000 Hi, I am trying to update an HP Netserver E60 machine, that was running fine with 4.0 RELEASE. I upgraded to 4.10 RELEASE, but not it freeze at boot time with GENERIC kernel. .... pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xffffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 Then nothing. Googling around, I notice that others have something that looks like: ... pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe4000000-0xe7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 ... Note the different memory range. So it could be a problem of BIOS setting. But right now I am out of clue, so help would be more than welcome. best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 10:38:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0CC16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:38:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E79B43D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:38:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j07Acd4O024019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:38:39 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j07AcdTT024016; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:38:39 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:38:39 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200501071038.j07AcdTT024016@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: sendmail update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:38:41 -0000 Hi, I have a question about the update procedure. I have a mail server running sendmail with a very customised configuration. So far I have compiled/installed my own copy of sendmail. If I update the system, it will re-install a standard sendmail. Now if I want the update procedure to regenerate my customised sendmail, where in FreeBSD sendmail hierarchy should I put my own cf/cf/sendmail.mc and devtools/Site/site.config.m4 ? Best regards, Olivier _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------- End of forwarded message ------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 10:48:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9888716A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:48:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6CE43D55 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:48:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j07AmKeI077988; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:48:20 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: Mo Po In-Reply-To: <1105064318.5088.12.camel@liber> References: <1105064318.5088.12.camel@liber> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:48:19 +0000 Message-Id: <1105094899.708.123.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: atheros (ath) wifi driver problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:48:18 -0000 On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 18:18 -0800, Mo Po wrote: > Hello, > > I installed FreeBSD 5.3 today (coming from linux/debian). > I need to use the atheros wifi driver (man page ATH(4)), which is > included in 5.3. (I have an atheros based PCI card in an athlon xp based > system). > > I get the following error when loading the module ('kldload if_ath' > command): > ... > ath0: could not map interrupt > device_attach: ath0 attach returned 6 I've never tried to load this as a kernel module. It's probably better to recompile the kernel with the right support. The ath driver also requires ath_hal, which might be your problem. You're obviously an old hand with un*x, but new to FreeBSD so in case it helps: #cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf #cp GENERIC MYKERNEL (or whatever name you want to use) #vi MYKERNEL add the lines: device ath device ath_hal Make sure the following line is uncommented: device wlan #cd /usr/src #make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL (or whatever you called it) #make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL #reboot This assumes you have the sources installed. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 11:02:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0D716A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:02:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thingy.apana.org.au (adsl-175.isp.net.au [202.1.119.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF4F43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:02:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from fun by thingy.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cmrsg-0004s9-00; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:02:10 +1100 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:02:10 +1100 From: David Gerard To: Paul Krill , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050107110210.GR2280@thingy.apana.org.au> References: <20050106123456.GC2280@thingy.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Subject: Re: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:02:59 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt (tedm@toybox.placo.com) [050107 17:37]: > David Gerard > > Ted Mittelstaedt (tedm@toybox.placo.com) [050106 06:29]: > > > It's of course quite legal for end users to download the JDK directly > > > from Sun and compile it on FreeBSD themselves and then use it. > > The main problem with this approach is that it requires a > > ridiculous amount > > of jumping through hoops - first you have to install the Linux > > compatibility interface and libraries (20 megabyte download and a > > reboot?), > Are you sure your not talking about the BINARY distributions? I > was referring the the source here: > http://www.sun.com/software/communitysource/j2se/java2/download.html > Only the Java Cryptography Extension is unavailable as source. More info > is of course available on the FreeBSD Java mailing list. I'm talking about installing from ports, which goes and compiles all three things (Linux compatibility, Linux Java, FreeBSD Java), I thought. - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 11:10:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C721D16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:10:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A3D43D49 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:10:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j07BA42x006025; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:10:06 +0200 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j07BA4gx059597; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:10:04 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j07BA4v9059596; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:10:04 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:10:04 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Olivier Nicole Message-ID: <20050107111004.GA59544@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <200501071038.j07AcdTT024016@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200501071038.j07AcdTT024016@mail.cs.ait.ac.th> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:10:31 -0000 On 2005-01-07 17:38, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > I have a mail server running sendmail with a very customised > configuration. So far I have compiled/installed my own copy of > sendmail. If I update the system, it will re-install a standard > sendmail. > > Now if I want the update procedure to regenerate my customised > sendmail, where in FreeBSD sendmail hierarchy should I put my own > cf/cf/sendmail.mc and devtools/Site/site.config.m4 ? The /usr/share/sendmail/cf stuff is copied from that tree to their destination by the Makefile in /usr/src/share/sendmail. I would probably put the extra files in /usr/src/share/sendmail and modify the Makefile of that directory accordingly. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 11:22:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F9716A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:22:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yggdrasil.interstroom.nl (yggdrasil.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA1343D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:22:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180] helo=[192.168.1.30]) by yggdrasil with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CmsCd-0001mr-00 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:22:47 +0100 Message-ID: <41DE7100.9050606@axis.nl> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:22:40 +0100 From: Olaf Greve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41B857A0.2070906@leg.ensieg.inpg.fr> In-Reply-To: <41B857A0.2070906@leg.ensieg.inpg.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Interstroom virusscan, please e-mail helpdesk@interstroom.nl for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: Subject: Problem when SSH-ing to FreeBSD 5.3 using PuTTY? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:22:54 -0000 Hi all, On two distinct machines (both running FreeBSD 5.3 release, one is the AMD-64 version, the other is the i386 version) I am experiencing problems when trying to SSH to the machine using PuTTY. PuTTY shows the login prompt just fine, but when entering the proper username/password (yes, I am positive I typed it correctly -multiple times, in fact- :) ). Yet, for some reason this combination does not seem to get accepted. Does anyone know the reason for this (note: I am not starting the SSH daemon from inetd)? Is there perhaps some (new) setting that changed between 5.2.1 and 5.3 that causes this, or am I doing something else terribly wrong? :) Thanks in advance for any answers, and cheers! Olafo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 11:27:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D617D16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:27:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from helium.webpack.hosteurope.de (helium.webpack.hosteurope.de [217.115.142.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4C243D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:27:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@hexren.net) Received: by helium.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.34 using asmtp helo=hexren.steenbuck.net) id 1CmsGk-0001Vv-9v; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:27:02 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:27:01 +0100 From: Hexren X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <171200245.20050107122701@hexren.net> To: Olaf Greve In-Reply-To: <41DE7100.9050606@axis.nl> References: <41B857A0.2070906@leg.ensieg.inpg.fr> <41DE7100.9050606@axis.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem when SSH-ing to FreeBSD 5.3 using PuTTY? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hexren List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:27:04 -0000 OG> Hi all, OG> On two distinct machines (both running FreeBSD 5.3 release, one is the OG> AMD-64 version, the other is the i386 version) I am experiencing OG> problems when trying to SSH to the machine using PuTTY. OG> PuTTY shows the login prompt just fine, but when entering the proper OG> username/password (yes, I am positive I typed it correctly -multiple OG> times, in fact- :) ). Yet, for some reason this combination does not OG> seem to get accepted. OG> Does anyone know the reason for this (note: I am not starting the SSH OG> daemon from inetd)? Is there perhaps some (new) setting that changed OG> between 5.2.1 and 5.3 that causes this, or am I doing something else OG> terribly wrong? :) OG> Thanks in advance for any answers, and cheers! OG> Olafo OG> _______________________________________________ OG> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list OG> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions OG> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------------------------------------- Look in /etc/ssh/sshd_conf for the setting "PasswordAuthentication" I think the default changed from yes to no. HExren From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 11:28:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A35516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:28:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kender.sians.org (adsl-ppp00.fastnet.gr [193.58.186.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC49A43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:28:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thanos@sians.org) Received: from kender.sians.org (thtsou@localhost.sians.org [127.0.0.1]) by kender.sians.org (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j07BS4ci024547 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:28:04 +0200 (EET) Received: (from thtsou@localhost) by kender.sians.org (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j07BS31Z026461 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:28:03 +0200 (EET) X-Authentication-Warning: kender.sians.org: thtsou set sender to thanos@sians.org using -f Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:28:03 +0200 From: Thanos Tsouanas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050107112803.GB10151@kender.sians.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050106001935.GA29480@kender.sians.org> <20050107030659.GA2673@Pandora.MHoerich.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050107030659.GA2673@Pandora.MHoerich.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Subject: Re: tcsh, colorful prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:28:12 -0000 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:06:59AM +0100, Mario Hoerich wrote: > # Thanos Tsouanas: > > I dont really care for the color of the prompt, but I would like > > to see what i type (input) with a specific color. > [...] > > In short, i would like the color to end upon \n... > > I think you can do this with > > alias postcmd 'echo "[0m"' > > For the character, press ctrl-v and then esc > (which inserts a ^[-character as literal). thanks! tput sgr0 also does the trick :) -- Thanos Tsouanas .: Sians http://thanos.sians.org/ .: http://www.sians.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 11:28:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0962F16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:28:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D5143D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:28:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so612180rnz for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:28:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:in-reply-to:x-mimeole:thread-index:message-id; b=jIbMMwDzwnup2DSfcPNRxhWVFRn2dHk1rA0GF3Yu9qGUAaZftFvRc1Rx7pHnlOHVBrcUmAItl5SlyXbhv20pvseU+/t4gwjHNZ4/l6wlNyUuhQ8dKP38X74AVd8DlEdM8V7PPqQcLzQImnbiQ72PzH0nCKIDxx5SxOoHl21RZuM= Received: by 10.38.8.13 with SMTP id 13mr255256rnh; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:28:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix ([220.225.80.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 72sm15449rna.2005.01.07.03.28.50; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:28:52 -0800 (PST) From: "Subhro" To: "'Olaf Greve'" , Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:58:41 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4F4DA.2304C6E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <41DE7100.9050606@axis.nl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcT0q1N15OOqgNspTqKaT21qvA5VlwAAHMQg Message-ID: <41de7274.6b025852.58bd.00b7@smtp.gmail.com> Subject: RE: Problem when SSH-ing to FreeBSD 5.3 using PuTTY? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:28:53 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4F4DA.2304C6E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Olaf Greve > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 16:53 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Problem when SSH-ing to FreeBSD 5.3 using PuTTY? > > Hi all, > > On two distinct machines (both running FreeBSD 5.3 release, one is the > AMD-64 version, the other is the i386 version) I am experiencing > problems when trying to SSH to the machine using PuTTY. > > PuTTY shows the login prompt just fine, but when entering the proper > username/password (yes, I am positive I typed it correctly -multiple > times, in fact- :) ). Yet, for some reason this combination does not > seem to get accepted. > > Does anyone know the reason for this (note: I am not starting the SSH > daemon from inetd)? Is there perhaps some (new) setting that changed > between 5.2.1 and 5.3 that causes this, or am I doing something else > terribly wrong? :) > > Thanks in advance for any answers, and cheers! > Olafo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Can we have the putty connect logs? Also is anything shown up in the syslogs? Are you sure the host is not in the deny list? Last but not the least, I would prefer a S/Key authentication more than a normal interactive password based authentication. Have you tried that? Regards S. Indian Institute of Information Technology Subhro Sankha Kar Block AQ-13/1, Sector V Salt Lake City PIN 700091 India ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4F4DA.2304C6E0 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJ4TCCAj0w ggGmAhEAzbp/VvDf5LxU/iKss3KqVTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFADBfMQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUG A1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVibGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2Vy dGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwHhcNOTYwMTI5MDAwMDAwWhcNMjgwODAxMjM1OTU5WjBfMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJVUzEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xNzA1BgNVBAsTLkNsYXNzIDEgUHVi bGljIFByaW1hcnkgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0A MIGJAoGBAOUZv22jVmEtmUhx9mfeuY3rt56GgAqRDvo4Ja9GiILlc6igmyRdDR/MZW4MsNBWhBiH mgabEKFz37RYOWtuwfYV1aioP6oSBo0xrH+wNNePNGeICc0UEeJORVZpH3gCgNrcR5EpuzbJY1zF 4Ncth3uhtzKwezC6Ki8xqu6jZ9rbAgMBAAEwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQADgYEATD+4i8Zo3+5DMw5d 6abLB4RNejP/khv0Nq3YlSI2aBFsfELM85wuxAc/FLAPT/+Qknb54rxK6Y/NoIAK98Up8YIiXbix 3YEjo3slFUYweRb46gVLlH8dwhzI47f0EEA8E8NfH1PoSOSGtHuhNbB7Jbq4046rPzidADQAmPPR cZQwggNmMIICz6ADAgECAhANi0/uqtIYW/R1ap0p4X/7MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAgUAMF8xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjE3MDUGA1UECxMuQ2xhc3MgMSBQdWJsaWMg UHJpbWFyeSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw05ODA1MTIwMDAwMDBaFw0wODA1MTIy MzU5NTlaMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1 c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNv cnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJ bmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQC7WkSKBBa7Vf0DeootlE8VeDa4DUqyb5xUv7zodyqdufBou5XZMUFweoFL uUgTVi3HCOGEQqvAopKrRFyqQvCCDgLpL/vCO7u+yScKXbawNkIztW5UiE+HSr8Z2vkV6A+Hthzj zMaajn9qJJLj/OBluqexfu/J2zdqyErICQbkmQIDAQABo4G0MIGxMBEGCWCGSAGG+EIBAQQEAwIB BjA1BgNVHR8ELjAsMCqgKKAmhiRodHRwOi8vY3JsLnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9wY2ExLjEuMS5jcmww RwYDVR0gBEAwPjA8BgtghkgBhvhFAQcBATAtMCsGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh93d3cudmVyaXNpZ24uY29t L3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBMA8GA1UdEwQIMAYBAf8CAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB AgUAA4GBAEJ8Dt+MeUysvwjsTVUvUImgxV5OLl6VMpt5rWURCxxKUsTVqDEhjt4Qm2wIxQfmA7nn yDR4CQnyvAZC+FqMg9GK3qoi9dnjIdLPZYwGM7DNILIzzQq9PuGdwTWpZLCnpSRb6fFo6xPEfDf0 lGQNmsW9MxfvgzOgPuWqPq7Ycx+tMIIEMjCCA5ugAwIBAgIQOo5O0s00DtVmctud5DTy6zANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQUFADCBzDEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNVBAsTFlZlcmlTaWdu IFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVwb3NpdG9yeS9SUEEg SW5jb3JwLiBCeSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxSDBGBgNVBAMTP1ZlcmlTaWduIENsYXNzIDEg Q0EgSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBTdWJzY3JpYmVyLVBlcnNvbmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDAeFw0wNDExMTEw MDAwMDBaFw0wNTA3MTgyMzU5NTlaMIIBEjEXMBUGA1UEChMOVmVyaVNpZ24sIEluYy4xHzAdBgNV BAsTFlZlcmlTaWduIFRydXN0IE5ldHdvcmsxRjBEBgNVBAsTPXd3dy52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vcmVw b3NpdG9yeS9SUEEgSW5jb3JwLiBieSBSZWYuLExJQUIuTFREKGMpOTgxHjAcBgNVBAsTFVBlcnNv bmEgTm90IFZhbGlkYXRlZDE0MDIGA1UECxMrRGlnaXRhbCBJRCBDbGFzcyAxIC0gTWljcm9zb2Z0 IEZ1bGwgU2VydmljZTETMBEGA1UEAxQKU3ViaHJvIEthcjEjMCEGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYUc3ViaHJv LmthckBnbWFpbC5jb20wgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAKzp0P4Gh5arpymZu4cW FUb1gQ+qcJtb5B788xi2oskigeKdCgj9tiw5VdAW2rXoOO435Ch2mjBylJb49TFDfy636Fw0F5ij VuyIwtVQQANoiMICBZ8MIZyrBSK9/PyoHeITsnIoCucE4qYGkLL3CYzijoU/iZGwAS0iif7H2jJL AgMBAAGjgcswgcgwCQYDVR0TBAIwADBEBgNVHSAEPTA7MDkGC2CGSAGG+EUBBxcDMCowKAYIKwYB BQUHAgEWHGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9ycGEwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgWgMB0GA1UdJQQW MBQGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDAjAUBgpghkgBhvhFAQYHBAYWBE5vbmUwMwYDVR0fBCwwKjAo oCagJIYiaHR0cDovL2NybC52ZXJpc2lnbi5jb20vY2xhc3MxLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOB gQBdijWu576noKjQbr0tQSROebsGab9JvR9rh3t9WagovURLjgi6zX/U6IxUSEXi4ECXtSZtEFpL 6yNUq+/mxEXvG7RX0Pe0T5iULmJxxrzO3Qvnc0UJJHKaYd5F4JD3c6YanGjwx3vDEfDQT8pzxHtb PXp6n18sFnbfiFG0ytSKPjGCBD4wggQ6AgEBMIHhMIHMMRcwFQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5j LjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFGMEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWdu LmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4sTElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UE AxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3Qg VmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggKyMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzEL BgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA1MDEwNzExMjg0MFowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYE FH8RL/P8Zpxv53WsXTI2WrB3e/HqMGcGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFaMFgwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZI hvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMAcGBSsOAwIa MAoGCCqGSIb3DQIFMIHyBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxgeQwgeEwgcwxFzAVBgNVBAoTDlZlcmlTaWduLCBJ bmMuMR8wHQYDVQQLExZWZXJpU2lnbiBUcnVzdCBOZXR3b3JrMUYwRAYDVQQLEz13d3cudmVyaXNp Z24uY29tL3JlcG9zaXRvcnkvUlBBIEluY29ycC4gQnkgUmVmLixMSUFCLkxURChjKTk4MUgwRgYD VQQDEz9WZXJpU2lnbiBDbGFzcyAxIENBIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgU3Vic2NyaWJlci1QZXJzb25hIE5v dCBWYWxpZGF0ZWQCEDqOTtLNNA7VZnLbneQ08uswgfQGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMYHkoIHhMIHMMRcw FQYDVQQKEw5WZXJpU2lnbiwgSW5jLjEfMB0GA1UECxMWVmVyaVNpZ24gVHJ1c3QgTmV0d29yazFG MEQGA1UECxM9d3d3LnZlcmlzaWduLmNvbS9yZXBvc2l0b3J5L1JQQSBJbmNvcnAuIEJ5IFJlZi4s TElBQi5MVEQoYyk5ODFIMEYGA1UEAxM/VmVyaVNpZ24gQ2xhc3MgMSBDQSBJbmRpdmlkdWFsIFN1 YnNjcmliZXItUGVyc29uYSBOb3QgVmFsaWRhdGVkAhA6jk7SzTQO1WZy253kNPLrMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIGAWYZnjrbofV4K0RXeXhObR5UUXghy2ooknfR3lQGKEAJolsqtuxGOm4Q5CmpElr+A 3irHiKkbHJOJha4uBit4eADxeA15rvlwZrTie/RgCLnYHJu/S4ei4Jkesz7/fWGJLnjb0iAuvkTz HUnkt3G1E86ujBNObzZOztOF1J78WIsAAAAAAAA= ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C4F4DA.2304C6E0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 11:44:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EE616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:44:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com [209.68.5.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A538943D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:44:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: (qmail 64753 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 11:44:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 11:44:20 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 217.196.247.135 Message-ID: <41DE7615.6010502@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:44:21 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: apachectl oddness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:44:23 -0000 I'm running standard freeBSD 4.9 and am port upgrading apache2. I think the old version was 2.50_3 and the new is 2.52_4. In the latest build I have added WITH_THREADS=1 as I need this for mod_python. I notice now that apachectl startssl has problems reading the pass phrase. I normally do this through the web using ssh/su and find that my putty terminal gets locked up when I enter the phrase at the prompt. The apachectl startssl fails for the first pass phrase entry at the console, but the second seems to work. I had to kill the previously hung httpd process. Experimenting shows that echo "pass phrase" | apachectl startssl works fine even through ssh. Am I stupid or doing something wrong? -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 11:51:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDD616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:51:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postino-1.etat.lu (postino-1.etat.lu [194.154.205.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5DC43D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:51:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didier.wiroth@mcesr.etat.lu) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by postino-1.etat.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E90D113D1B2 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:51:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from avirus-1.cie.etat.lu (dispatch-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.137.6]) by localhost (CIE ESMTP Dispatch 1) with ESMTP id 857082143E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:51:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) 72AF42140F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:51:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from hermes-1.cie.etat.lu (hermes-1.cie.etat.lu [148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9Y005EO3L9VNA0@store.etat.lu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:51:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from etat.lu ([148.110.136.56]) by store.etat.lu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9Y00AN03L9HX50@store.etat.lu> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:51:09 +0100 (MET) Received: from [192.168.2.43] (Forwarded-For: [158.64.125.24]) by store.etat.lu (mshttpd); Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:51:09 +0100 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:51:09 +0100 From: Didier Wiroth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: fr Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: fr Priority: normal Subject: similar dmassage tool for freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:51:12 -0000 Hi, For openbsd there is a tool called dmassage . From the original doc: dmassage parses the dmesg of your OpenBSD system, and can do three things with that information: a) make the kernel boot faster b) reduce kernel size c) show all devices in a tree-like hierarchy Does a similar tool exist for freebsd which can do point b) and c) thx didier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 11:52:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2FB616A4CE; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:52:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from recife.ipadnet.com.br (recife.ipadnet.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46BA43D39; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:52:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from marioLobo ([200.249.204.142]) by recife.ipadnet.com.br (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j07BwxwT008406; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:58:59 -0300 From: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Organization: IPAD To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:56:37 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41DE4EC5.17019.13DDF2@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sk0: discard oversize frame (ether type ....) [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:52:27 -0000 The upgrade to 5-CURRENT did it. sk0 now works fine ! On 5 Jan 2005 at 11:14, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Doing it right now!! > > Thanks, > > -- > //| //|| > // | // || > -//--//---|| ARIO LOBO > // // || > --------------------------------- > mario.lobo@ipad.com.br > http://www.ipad.com.br > > On 5 Jan 2005 at 12:58, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > please update to RELENG_5; it's fixed there already:) > > > > -- > > Greetings > > Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- //| //|| // | // || -//--//---|| ARIO LOBO // // || --------------------------------- mario.lobo@ipad.com.br http://www.ipad.com.br From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 12:02:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7F616A4CF; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:02:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from recife.ipadnet.com.br (recife.ipadnet.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669DF43D31; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:02:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from marioLobo ([200.249.204.142]) by recife.ipadnet.com.br (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j07C8mwT009535; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:08:49 -0300 From: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Organization: IPAD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:06:27 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41DE5113.24978.1CDD38@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: netstat odd behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:02:18 -0000 Hello; On all installations of FreeBSD I=B4ve ever done in the past, netstat -an displays LISTENing servers and any tcp connection in any state. On the 5.3 I have installed here ( updated to RELENG_5_3 + build/installwo= rld ), this command only shows only this; -------------------------------------------- Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) udp4 0 0 *.514 *.* Active UNIX domain sockets Address Type Recv-Q Send-Q Inode Conn Refs Nextref Addr c38d01a4 stream 0 0 c3de8738 0 0 0 /db/mysq= l/mysql.sock c38d1000 stream 0 0 c3883c60 0 0 0 /var/run= /devd.pipe c38d0ec4 dgram 0 0 c3883210 0 0 0 /var/run= /log -------------------------------------------- I have ssh, sendmail, ftpd and mysql daemons running, LISTENing and WORKIN= G. Would anybody know why they are not showing on the output of netstat? Thanks, -- //| //|| // | // || -//--//---|| ARIO LOBO // // || --------------------------------- mario.lobo@ipad.com.br http://www.ipad.com.br From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 12:16:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5769916A4CF for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:16:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yggdrasil.interstroom.nl (yggdrasil.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D6943D5A for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:16:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180] helo=[192.168.1.30]) by yggdrasil with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cmt2m-0000Lv-00 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:16:40 +0100 Message-ID: <41DE7DA3.8060206@axis.nl> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:16:35 +0100 From: Olaf Greve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41B857A0.2070906@leg.ensieg.inpg.fr> In-Reply-To: <41B857A0.2070906@leg.ensieg.inpg.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Interstroom virusscan, please e-mail helpdesk@interstroom.nl for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: Subject: Sil 3114 RAID controller issues with FreeBSD 5.3 Release AMD-64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:16:46 -0000 Hi, A client of mine asked me to install their AMD-64 machine as a MySQL database server. Totally against my strong suggestion to use a proper SCSI hardware RAID 10 solution (or at least a hardware SATA RAID solution), they insist on using the internal Sil 3114 software RAID controller in RAID 1 mode. Now, this 'cost reduction' from them backfires, as FreeBSD 5.3 Release AMD-64 does not properly recognise this controller. First, it locks up when booting with ACPI enabled (easily fixable by either disabling ACPI in the BIOS, or by booting without ACPI), then the bootstrap loader first seemingly does recognise the RAID 1 array (at least it states something to the effect of "Drive C from BIOS...", but when the installation CD-ROM has booted, lo and behold! It does not see both drives as an array, but as separate drives! I looked around a bit on the Internet, and seemingly this issue started to occur around mid june last year with FreeBSD 5.3 versions for these type of Silicon RAID controllers. Now, of course I am still trying to get my client to do it properly and forget this el-cheapo RAID solution and simply buy a hardware RAID controller, but if I can't succeed in convincing them, I'd really like to enable the RAID array of this controller after all. Does anyone know how this can be achieved? Is it possible to patch the device driver once FreeBSD is installed, and somehow get FreeBSD to build the RAID array? Thanks in advance, and cheers! Olafo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 12:25:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB0D16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:25:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBFD543D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:25:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.108?) (mjeays2551@24.114.152.139 with plain) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 12:25:02 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net In-Reply-To: <41DE0F6F.3040303@taborandtashell.net> References: <41DDB2A7.8020001@wilderness.dyn.dhs.org> <41DE0F6F.3040303@taborandtashell.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1105100701.640.6.camel@chaucer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:25:02 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Laurence Sanford cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Remote upgrade possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:25:04 -0000 On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 23:26, Tabor Kelly wrote: > Laurence Sanford wrote: > > Joseph Koenig (jWeb) wrote: > > > > > This is possible, however you are always taking a chance when you > > installworld without going to single user mode first. That said, I make > > a habit out of pushing my luck with systems I have in front of me by > > going so far as to make installworld while using an xterm in X-windows. > > I routinely use 'portupgrade -rRN' in xterm, in X-Windows to install new > ports on my box. The second to last time I did this, one of the ports > what was upgraded was xterm. And it worked! Can anybody explain to my > why nothing bad happened? Am I running a risk when I do this? This seems pretty safe to me. When xterm gets invoked, the whole of the code gets loaded into memory for execution, and there is no reason why it would look at the disk copy again. If you upgrade the xterm binary, nothing will happen to xterms that are already running. If you create new ones, you will get the new version. I am more surprised that there are still any udpdates being made to xterm - it must have been essentially stable for years now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 12:26:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEDB16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:26:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0EC143D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:26:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.108?) (mjeays2551@24.114.152.139 with plain) by smtp105.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 12:26:50 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1105100809.640.8.camel@chaucer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:26:49 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Paul Krill Subject: RE: Sun revokes FreeBSD license for Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:26:51 -0000 > Only the Java Cryptography Extension is unavailable as source. More info > is of course available on the FreeBSD Java mailing list. So why would anyone trust it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 12:32:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0C116A4D4 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:32:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F47643D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:32:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CmtHs-0000Tt-V7; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:32:17 +0100 Message-ID: <41DE8150.1010302@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:32:16 +0100 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041124 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Skylar Thompson References: <51296.192.168.2.2.1105070167.squirrel@new.host.name> <41DE37E3.8020709@cs.earlham.edu> In-Reply-To: <41DE37E3.8020709@cs.earlham.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.> >>>>gather >> FreeBSD only works on UltraSPARC. >> >> > > The SS20 isn't anI've> use old SS5's as loghosts and FlexLM license hosts under OpenBSD. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- cc: madden@cms-stl.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Sun SPARC 20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:32:23 -0000 Skylar Thompson wrote: > madden@cms-stl.com wrote: > >> I've got a Sun SPARC 20 collecting dust, and I was wondering if any >> version of FreeBSD would run on my Sun SPARC 20? From what I can gather >> FreeBSD only works on UltraSPARC. >> >> > > The SS20 isn't an UltraSPARC, so it won't be supported by FreeBSD's > Sparc64 port. I've had good luck running NetBSD on an SS20, and IPCs and > IPXs, though. > Same with OpenBSD on SS5, which is the same architecture as SS20. I use old SS5's as loghosts and FlexLM license hosts under OpenBSD. -- Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax : -3341 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 12:49:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A782016A4CF for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:49:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBB4A43D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:49:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Jan 2005 12:49:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) (129.187.19.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 07 Jan 2005 13:49:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91F19C0D4; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:49:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:49:30 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Message-ID: <20050107124930.GA1325@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <41DE5113.24978.1CDD38@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DE5113.24978.1CDD38@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netstat odd behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:49:33 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable mario.lobo@ipad.com.br wrote: > On all installations of FreeBSD I?ve ever done in the past, >=20 > netstat -an >=20 > displays LISTENing servers and any tcp connection in any state. >=20 > On the 5.3 I have installed here ( updated to RELENG_5_3 + build/installw= orld ), this command only > shows only this; [ no tcp servers ] I had the same problem, updating to RELENG_5 fixed it for me. Simon --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3oVaCkn+/eutqCoRAlboAJ4zj+GPbT3hOCjRypTEHTHIdWcIaACg9Yma Z9RggBSWggnx2ElntkkqIyI= =6dMx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 12:54:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BADE16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:54:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFEB43D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:54:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (rrkspmt@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07CreFf021986; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:54:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:53:31 -0500 To: afabian@austin.rr.com From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:54:53 -0000 At 12:36 AM 1/7/2005, afabian@austin.rr.com wrote: >It does. You might want to try something like: > >du -x / | sort -rn | head -15 > >to figure out wheer your diskspace has gone. Ok, I've cleared half the space by rm -r /root/.cpan. Now I have # df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 128990 60094 58578 51% / /dev/ad0s1f 257998 81790 155570 34% /tmp /dev/ad1s1e 2030062 926976 940682 50% /usr /dev/ad0s1e 257998 2110 235250 1% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc and # du -x / | sort -rn | head -15 60093 / 15052 /root 13750 /root/nmap-3.50 12600 /sbin 6318 /modules.old 6318 /modules 4378 /bin 2766 /stand 1942 /root/nmap-3.50/nsock 1908 /root/nmap-3.50/nsock/src 1380 /etc 1174 /root/nmap-3.50/libpcre 1058 /root/nmap-3.50/libpcap-possiblymodified 888 /root/nmap-3.50/nbase 764 /root/nmap-3.50/docs Let's say I want to mv /sbin /usr/sbin mv /root /usr/root How problematic can this become? I can anticipate at least having to revise perl scripts that reference the sendmail path, although ln -s /usr/sbin/sendmail /sbin/sendmail will avoid having to 'fix' source code, right? Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 13:05:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B92616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:05:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C0B43D58 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:05:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j07D5gx8097725; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:05:52 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:05:42 +0000 Message-Id: <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:05:51 -0000 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 07:53 -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > At 12:36 AM 1/7/2005, afabian@austin.rr.com wrote: > > >It does. You might want to try something like: > > > >du -x / | sort -rn | head -15 > > > >to figure out wheer your diskspace has gone. > > Ok, I've cleared half the space by rm -r /root/.cpan. > > Now I have > > # df > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad0s1a 128990 60094 58578 51% / > /dev/ad0s1f 257998 81790 155570 34% /tmp > /dev/ad1s1e 2030062 926976 940682 50% /usr > /dev/ad0s1e 257998 2110 235250 1% /var > procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc > > > and > > # du -x / | sort -rn | head -15 > 60093 / > 15052 /root > 13750 /root/nmap-3.50 > 12600 /sbin > 6318 /modules.old > 6318 /modules > 4378 /bin > 2766 /stand > 1942 /root/nmap-3.50/nsock > 1908 /root/nmap-3.50/nsock/src > 1380 /etc > 1174 /root/nmap-3.50/libpcre > 1058 /root/nmap-3.50/libpcap-possiblymodified > 888 /root/nmap-3.50/nbase > 764 /root/nmap-3.50/docs > > > Let's say I want to > > mv /sbin /usr/sbin > mv /root /usr/root > > How problematic can this become? I can anticipate at least having to revise > perl scripts that reference the sendmail path, although > > ln -s /usr/sbin/sendmail /sbin/sendmail > > will avoid having to 'fix' source code, right? How about: #mv /sbin /usr/sbin #ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin #mv /root /usr/root #ln -s /usr/root /root Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 13:11:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7725516A503 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:11:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE58743D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:11:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.lieder@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Jan 2005 13:11:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [212.19.59.214]) (212.19.59.214) by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 07 Jan 2005 14:11:06 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3623685 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <934A0537-60AD-11D9-A652-000D933AB0EA@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Volker Lieder Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:11:00 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Bind 9.3.0 Server on Freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:11:08 -0000 Hello list, i need to install a DNS-Server for more than 1000 Domains, official internet DNS-Server. I tried out to install a bind 9.3.0, but after i start the server a few minutes later it don't answers any dns-requests. Has someone an idea where i find information to tune my dns-server? Volker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 13:24:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2448C16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:24:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56FC43D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:24:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 336EE37FF4; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:24:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.178]) by av1-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D1E37F70 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:24:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id B46D437E44 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:24:24 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 47812 invoked by uid 1001); 7 Jan 2005 13:24:24 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:24:24 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Olaf Greve Message-ID: <20050107132423.GA47763@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Olaf Greve , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41B857A0.2070906@leg.ensieg.inpg.fr> <41DE7DA3.8060206@axis.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DE7DA3.8060206@axis.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sil 3114 RAID controller issues with FreeBSD 5.3 Release AMD-64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:24:27 -0000 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:16:35PM +0100, Olaf Greve wrote: > Hi, > > A client of mine asked me to install their AMD-64 machine as a MySQL > database server. Totally against my strong suggestion to use a proper > SCSI hardware RAID 10 solution (or at least a hardware SATA RAID > solution), they insist on using the internal Sil 3114 software RAID > controller in RAID 1 mode. > > Now, this 'cost reduction' from them backfires, as FreeBSD 5.3 Release > AMD-64 does not properly recognise this controller. First, it locks up > when booting with ACPI enabled (easily fixable by either disabling ACPI > in the BIOS, or by booting without ACPI), then the bootstrap loader > first seemingly does recognise the RAID 1 array (at least it states > something to the effect of "Drive C from BIOS...", but when the > installation CD-ROM has booted, lo and behold! It does not see both > drives as an array, but as separate drives! > > I looked around a bit on the Internet, and seemingly this issue started > to occur around mid june last year with FreeBSD 5.3 versions for these > type of Silicon RAID controllers. > > Now, of course I am still trying to get my client to do it properly and > forget this el-cheapo RAID solution and simply buy a hardware RAID > controller, but if I can't succeed in convincing them, I'd really like > to enable the RAID array of this controller after all. > > Does anyone know how this can be achieved? Is it possible to patch the > device driver once FreeBSD is installed, and somehow get FreeBSD to > build the RAID array? I don't think FreeBSD supports the SiI 3114 as a RAID controller, but only as a normal controller. All the RAID stuff for that controller is done in software anyway, but FreeBSD needs to know what format the BIOS uses for a RAID setup, and it doesn't. I guess you could set up a pure software RAID-1 solution using vinum, but not having done that myself I can't say for sure. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/vinum-vinum.html for information on how to use and setup vinum. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 13:36:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA2A16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:36:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC3443D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:36:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so27672wra for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:36:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=reMXh78ZHHZFE4qf9mxVYN3Ee2O7abWB0aNuJqjBASxZzAMIkFT3o+V9cShQHOet4XNa8OV/yeNHLd/sYdxNOccd7khxTBMykXBOmvQfVjfAy/gyqrt0d1CLJJ3aReLQzAjff30cTK7Il0jG1g5SWd89y5tZLWT6VeaFksXLEZc= Received: by 10.54.6.43 with SMTP id 43mr179385wrf; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:36:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:36:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:36:30 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Scott Bennett In-Reply-To: <200501070831.j078VbPF021546@mp.cs.niu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200501070831.j078VbPF021546@mp.cs.niu.edu> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:36:31 -0000 On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:31:37 -0600 (CST), Scott Bennett wrote: > On Thu Jan 6 09:58:55 2005 Jerry McAllister > wrote: > > >> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:10 -0700 Danny MacMillan > >> wrote: > >> > >> >On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:35:43PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: > >> >> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 Danny MacMillan > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >This is not intuitive, but you do not want to use the "make a > >> >> >bootable CD" function of Sonic RecordNow! to make a bootable CD. > >> >> > >> >> On what basis is the above statement made if you haven't used > >> >> Sonic RecordNow! ? It certainly looks to me as though the green > >> >> button is the *only* way to burn an image (not counting making an > >> >> exact copy of > >> > > >> >On the basis of your characterizing the little green button as being > >> >"for making a bootable CD", and my understanding of that function in > >> >alternative software. In short: I misunderstood. I apologize for > >> >the misdirection. > >> > > >> Oh. That was because, if one places the cursor over the green > >> button, a box appears temporarily bearing a line that says, "Click > >> here to make this CD/DVD bootable". And, as noted in a different > >> posting in this thread, that button brings up a browser panel for > >> choosing an image file (but not displaying .iso files among the > >> choices) to burn in making the bootable disk. > > > >Just an additional note for clarity: If I understand - and I don't > >have the rest of the thread so I may be missing something - you want > >to make a bootable CD of one of the ISO images. > > > >In that case, you do NOT want to use any of the options on your local > >machine to create a bootable CD because the ISO image is already a > >bootable image. It needs merely to be written raw to the media. > > > >When your utility asks if you want to create a bootable CD, it is > >asking if you want it to add a boot record for it and the other pointers > >to the file to make it bootable. Since the FreeeBSD ISO already has > >that stuff in it, you don't want it done again. So, choose the options > >that just write the data image directly to the CD with no additions. > > > No, no. This is wrong. You missed the explanation I posted regarding > Sonic RecordNow!, as well as an earlier one by Robin Becker. The green > button is the only way to tell the application that the file(s) it is to > burn is/are image file(s), and it doesn't know that .iso files are a type > of image file, so it doesn't list them in its browser unless you tell it > to display *all* files in the chosen directory. Obviously, this Sonic RecordNow? software isn't working well for you. Have you considered any of the alternatives that burn isos without problems; Nero, Alcohol, Fireburner ? -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 13:54:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C3A16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:54:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C83643D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:54:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cjalmond@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so188662rne for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:54:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=c9neuyoDRhW28DjBgTav+EkWKyw+r7mTwYv8EyVkxXkQoUsfRaeLYf4b20o5LN7nfpb602iulONTmTvGex/D8iu07oApRbJKJnF0uLp4Fxp2ummwg4yogETxqKcTgNkbwPVXdWAjtAp1RknHPAoeM+63aAOkMwIuQoeccAHrw38= Received: by 10.39.2.6 with SMTP id e6mr2523rni; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:54:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.97.21 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:54:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92b67e1b0501070554f1e2e7a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:54:45 -0600 From: Curtis Almond To: Unreal HSHH In-Reply-To: <9b6b59500501042113452715b1@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <9b6b59500501042113452715b1@mail.gmail.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Howto check the hard disk bad sectors in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Curtis Almond List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:54:46 -0000 You can do a simple dd command to read the entire disk. If bad sectors are found during the dd you should see ATA error messages spewing to the console and written in /var/log/messages. On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:13:18 +0800, Unreal HSHH wrote: > Hi, > > I have one harddisk installed in FreeBSD. > And I want to check if any bad sectors on it. > How can I do ? It seems the fsck can't do this. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 13:55:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661EC16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:55:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D41643D55 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:55:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so29297wra for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:55:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=hUVnqIuPi1U4Fxaw277ZFzxOsfcIeVUHnW6U9Yw2OgZkpmMh9I4zeGVRfe2kcb6GnNrDbWQ4OJgqExpC+9qSuNzuA4Y0aKdBcS9t5QsL/DFA5Wto5KyDI+xaMhNpOqiEfVPWA9saFVWexjFtIBzvLZPXrkBJlroUJ2FFczwkVRA= Received: by 10.54.48.59 with SMTP id v59mr179683wrv; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 05:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 05:55:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:55:21 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:55:30 -0000 On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:05:42 +0000, Peter Risdon wrote: > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 07:53 -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > > Let's say I want to > > > > mv /sbin /usr/sbin > > mv /root /usr/root > > > > How problematic can this become? I can anticipate at least having to revise > > perl scripts that reference the sendmail path, although > > > > ln -s /usr/sbin/sendmail /sbin/sendmail > > > > will avoid having to 'fix' source code, right? > > How about: > > #mv /sbin /usr/sbin > #ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin > #mv /root /usr/root > #ln -s /usr/root /root Or just stop logging in as root, setup a user account for admin tasks, and learn to use sudo ;) -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 14:18:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BB916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:18:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stewie.obfuscated.net (stewie.obfuscated.net [66.118.188.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4F443D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:18:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@obmail.net) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (653259hfc120.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.59.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by stewie.obfuscated.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07146104; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:18:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <41DE61A1.7020802@computerking.ca> References: <41DE61A1.7020802@computerking.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: M Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:17:21 -0500 To: RYAN vAN GINNEKEN X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: failover for http X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:18:10 -0000 On Jan 7, 2005, at 5:17 AM, RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote: > Does anyone know of a good package or howto that covers the failover > topic?? I have found lots of stuff on google but hard to know if > these progs do what i need. There has to be something in the ports > that archive this spread with wackmole maybe seems very complex and > not even sure it will suit my needs??? > > I have 2 server in different locations with different ip's is it > possible to have these servers back each other up? I have read ip on > the cheap from the Unix hacks book but it does not seem to cover the > different location and ip issue. > Please a point in the right direction would be great. > The best solutions for this are based on your switching hardware which will integrate with your DNS. Foundry has a feature of some products called GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing?), but that's not going to happen on the cheap. There are several patent issues to deal with in creating something to do that which may be why no one has built similar features in to PF or IPF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 14:24:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56E416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:24:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF0143D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (iqwhqnk@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07EO5Ff016314; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:24:11 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:24:17 -0500 To: Joshua Lokken , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:24:27 -0000 At 08:55 AM 1/7/2005, Joshua Lokken wrote: >On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:05:42 +0000, Peter Risdon > > > How about: > > > > #mv /sbin /usr/sbin > > #ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin > > #mv /root /usr/root > > #ln -s /usr/root /root I've run into a little bit of trouble here. I ssh into my fbsd box as user marty in group wheel, then su - as needed. As you'll see below, I wasn't able to set up the link for /root and now can't su to root either. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ # mv /sbin /usr/sbin # ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin # mv /root /usr/root # ls -s /usr/root /root ls: /root: No such file or directory /usr/root: total 1294 2 .cpan 2 .profile 14 mbox 2 .cshrc 2 .rnd 2 msg.txt 2 .fetchmailrc 2 .ssh 0 msg.txt~ 4 .history 2 exec 4 nmap-3.50 2 .klogin 2 ipfw.ac.list 1248 nmap-3.50.tar.bz2 2 .login 2 kernels # ls -l / total 10857 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 802 Apr 3 2003 .cshrc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 251 Apr 3 2003 .profile -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4735 Apr 3 2003 COPYRIGHT drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Feb 9 2004 bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 boot drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 cdrom lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Feb 9 2004 compat -> usr/compat drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 17920 Feb 16 2004 dev drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 dist drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 2048 Jun 16 2004 etc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 9 Feb 9 2004 home -> /usr/home -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2736474 Feb 18 2004 kernel -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 2003 kernel.GENERIC -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 2003 kernel.old drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 mnt drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 4096 Feb 18 2004 modules drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 4096 Feb 18 2004 modules.old dr-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 512 Jan 7 09:13 proc lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 9 Jan 7 09:11 sbin -> /usr/sbin drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 1024 Feb 9 2004 stand lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Feb 18 2004 sys -> /usr/src/sys drwxrwxrwt 9 root wheel 1024 Jan 7 03:05 tmp drwxr-xr-x 19 root wheel 512 Jan 7 09:12 usr drwxr-xr-x 21 root wheel 512 Mar 1 2004 var # exit logout %su - Password: su: no directory %id uid=1000(marty) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel), 31(guest) %ls -l /usr total 52 ---------- 1 root wheel 111 Dec 31 1969 @LongLink drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Feb 16 2004 X11R6 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 7168 Feb 18 2004 bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 compat drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 games drwxr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Jun 16 2004 guide drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 home drwxr-xr-x 41 root wheel 4096 Feb 9 2004 include drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 6144 Apr 3 2003 lib drwxr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Apr 3 2003 libdata drwxr-xr-x 8 root wheel 1536 Feb 9 2004 libexec drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 512 Feb 29 2004 local drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 obj drwxr-xr-x 60 root wheel 1536 Feb 16 2004 ports drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 512 Jan 7 07:42 root drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 4608 Jan 7 09:11 sbin drwxr-xr-x 27 root wheel 512 Apr 3 2003 share drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 512 Feb 18 2004 src %ln -s /usr/root /root ln: /root: Permission denied %su - Password: su: no directory % ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >Or just stop logging in as root, setup a user account for admin tasks, and >learn to use sudo ;) That's next on the list, once I get use of root back so I can install the sudo port (this was a mini-iso install). Thanks, this started as (I'd thought) very minor and is becoming consciousness expanding. Great end of the week project. Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 14:31:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77A916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:31:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5AE43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:31:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j07EUtaZ097903; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:30:56 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:30:54 +0000 Message-Id: <1105108254.708.141.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:31:07 -0000 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:24 -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > At 08:55 AM 1/7/2005, Joshua Lokken wrote: > >On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:05:42 +0000, Peter Risdon > > > > > How about: > > > > > > #mv /sbin /usr/sbin > > > #ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin > > > #mv /root /usr/root > > > #ln -s /usr/root /root > > I've run into a little bit of trouble here. I ssh into my fbsd box as user > marty in group wheel, then su - as needed. > > As you'll see below, I wasn't able to set up the link for /root and now > can't su to root either. > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > # mv /sbin /usr/sbin > # ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin > # mv /root /usr/root > # ls -s /usr/root /root Typo here: ls instead of ln - that's why there's no link. Do you have physical access to the machine? Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 14:39:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B2216A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:39:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from admin.cablespeed.com (mail.admin.cablespeed.com [216.15.205.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B2243D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:39:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from data2@cablespeed.com) Received: from [24.56.220.5] (account data2@cablespeed.com HELO mdm2205) by admin.cablespeed.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 92749639; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:39:00 -0600 Message-ID: <1a7801c4f4c6$adff2ce0$05dc3818@mdm2205> From: "Jon Krause" To: "Olaf Greve" , References: <41B857A0.2070906@leg.ensieg.inpg.fr> <41DE7100.9050606@axis.nl> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:39:22 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Subject: Re: Problem when SSH-ing to FreeBSD 5.3 using PuTTY? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:39:01 -0000 From: Olafo : Hi all, : : On two distinct machines (both running FreeBSD 5.3 release, one is the : AMD-64 version, the other is the i386 version) I am experiencing : problems when trying to SSH to the machine using PuTTY. : : PuTTY shows the login prompt just fine, but when entering the proper : username/password (yes, I am positive I typed it correctly -multiple : times, in fact- :) ). Yet, for some reason this combination does not : seem to get accepted. : : Does anyone know the reason for this (note: I am not starting the SSH : daemon from inetd)? Is there perhaps some (new) setting that changed : between 5.2.1 and 5.3 that causes this, or am I doing something else : terribly wrong? :) : : Thanks in advance for any answers, and cheers! : Olafo : ########################## Olafo, You did not state the version of Putty you are using. Try the latest version, (release 0.56) I beleive. There was a problem in earlier versions of Putty with keyboard-interactive method of authentication. Best, Jon _______________________________________________ : freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list : http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions : To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 14:39:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF2816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:39:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD9A43D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:39:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 39427 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 06:39:49 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 06:39:49 -0800 Message-ID: <41DE9F26.6080700@taborandtashell.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:39:34 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Risdon References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> In-Reply-To: <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Marty Landman cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:39:58 -0000 Peter Risdon wrote: > How about: > > #mv /sbin /usr/sbin > #ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin > #mv /root /usr/root > #ln -s /usr/root /root Isn't this a bad idea if you ever have to boot to single user mode and only have / mounted? -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 14:48:49 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CC216A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:48:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0748B43D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:48:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (fbemwwk@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07EmVFf010609; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:48:32 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107094403.030a3d38@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:48:42 -0500 To: Peter Risdon From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <1105108254.708.141.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> <1105108254.708.141.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:48:49 -0000 At 09:30 AM 1/7/2005, Peter Risdon wrote: > > > > # mv /sbin /usr/sbin > > # ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin > > # mv /root /usr/root > > # ls -s /usr/root /root > >Typo here: ls instead of ln - that's why there's no link. Oh man, could I be any stupider? >Do you have physical access to the machine? Yep, haven't used the console in many months. Wonder what my Chucky screen saver looks like nowadays. How do I get back on with root permissions from the console so I create the needed link? Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 14:52:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D105E16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:52:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from votris.mrdata.com (votris.mrdata.com [216.61.45.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0750343D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:52:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from blakef@votris.mrdata.com) Received: from votris.mrdata.com (localhost.mrdata.com [127.0.0.1]) by votris.mrdata.com (8.12.2/8.12.5) with ESMTP id j07EqQ8A031347 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:52:26 -0600 (CST) Received: (from blakef@localhost) by votris.mrdata.com (8.12.2/8.12.1/Submit) id j07EqQ2A031346 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:52:26 -0600 (CST) From: Blake Freeburg Message-Id: <200501071452.j07EqQ2A031346@votris.mrdata.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:52:26 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: network slows 1000x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:52:28 -0000 Hello, I have a Duron based FreeBSD box (4.10-current) that I am using as a nat box. Kernel is recompiled with options. When a lot of traffic flows across the interface from internal to external networks, I find that the natd appears to get congested, making ping times to the next hop (still on my network) go from .1 ms to 1000s of ms. Rebooting fixes it Nothing is reported in dmesg (I upgraded from 4.6 where I saw this problem) then there would be this message about queue lengths... The relavent devices are... xl0: <3Com 3c905-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xc800-0xc83f irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0 vr0: port 0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xe0117000-0xe01170ff irq 11 at device 18.0 on pci0 This happens once a day there abouts (depends on what's been moved between internal and external networks. Any ideas? Blake Freeburg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:02:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF0F16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:02:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E2443D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:02:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([82.161.136.218]:10041 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmvdV-000DHE-NS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:02:45 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA51A1A9A7 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:02:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.111] (82-197-198-30.dsl.cambrium.nl [82.197.198.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113263701E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:02:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DEA491.4090505@scii.nl> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:02:41 +0100 From: albi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200501071452.j07EqQ2A031346@votris.mrdata.com> In-Reply-To: <200501071452.j07EqQ2A031346@votris.mrdata.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: network slows 1000x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:02:46 -0000 Blake Freeburg wrote: > When a lot of traffic flows across the interface from internal to external networks, I find that the natd appears to get congested, making ping times to the next hop (still on my network) go from .1 ms to 1000s of ms. > > Rebooting fixes it ------- cut ----- > This happens once a day there abouts (depends on what's been moved between internal and external networks. i've seen a box with 2 NICs where 1 NIC needed a reboot every 2 or 3 days (replaced it when the problem was clear), i think the logfiles (on M0n0wall) mentioned corrupted memory on the NIC, so perhaps it's due to failure of one of your networkcards ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:04:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B777916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:04:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yggdrasil.interstroom.nl (yggdrasil.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7691943D49 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:04:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180] helo=[192.168.1.30]) by yggdrasil with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CmvfL-0007nZ-00 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:04:39 +0100 Message-ID: <41DEA504.30803@axis.nl> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:04:36 +0100 From: Olaf Greve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41B857A0.2070906@leg.ensieg.inpg.fr> <41DE7100.9050606@axis.nl> <1a7801c4f4c6$adff2ce0$05dc3818@mdm2205> In-Reply-To: <1a7801c4f4c6$adff2ce0$05dc3818@mdm2205> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Interstroom virusscan, please e-mail helpdesk@interstroom.nl for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: Subject: Re: Problem when SSH-ing to FreeBSD 5.3 using PuTTY? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:04:54 -0000 Hi Jon, > You did not state the version of Putty you are using. Hmmm, good one. I just checked and it is version 0.50. > Try the latest version, (release 0.56) I beleive. > There was a problem in earlier versions of Putty with keyboard-interactive > method of authentication. I'll give that a shot. It's quite interesting that it would work with fbsd 5.2.1 (and earlier) and not with fbsd 5.3, but it might indeed be the culprit. Either way: after the weekend I shall let you guys know what the culprit was. :) Cheerz and 'ave a good weekend! Olafo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:05:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE1316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:05:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yggdrasil.interstroom.nl (yggdrasil.interstroom.nl [80.85.129.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F5543D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:04:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from o.greve@axis.nl) Received: from ip127-180.introweb.nl ([80.65.127.180] helo=[192.168.1.30]) by yggdrasil with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cmvfe-0007rk-00 for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:04:58 +0100 Message-ID: <41DEA517.6000705@axis.nl> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:04:55 +0100 From: Olaf Greve User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41B857A0.2070906@leg.ensieg.inpg.fr> <41DE7DA3.8060206@axis.nl> <20050107132423.GA47763@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20050107132423.GA47763@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner-Information: Interstroom virusscan, please e-mail helpdesk@interstroom.nl for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: Subject: Re: Sil 3114 RAID controller issues with FreeBSD 5.3 Release AMD-64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:05:00 -0000 Hi Erik, Thanks for your answer! > I don't think FreeBSD supports the SiI 3114 as a RAID controller, but > only as a normal controller. All the RAID stuff for that controller is > done in software anyway, but FreeBSD needs to know what format the BIOS > uses for a RAID setup, and it doesn't. Indeed that is what I also fear, hence my reluctance at having to spend much time trying to figure out a way to enable this controller for RAID purposes, whereas it is an -IMO- bad choice anyway to use this for their RAID strategy. :((( > I guess you could set up a pure software RAID-1 solution using vinum, > but not having done that myself I can't say for sure. See > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/vinum-vinum.html > for information on how to use and setup vinum. Yes, that would probably be another option. Again it would have the same downside though: I've never done this before, so I'll have to spend time getting that going. In this case, time IS money, so that's why I'm trying to convince my client to better spend that money (and my time) on simply buying a supported hardware RAID controller, which really is a win-win situation for both my client and myself. However, somehow I've not yet been able to drive that argument home, so who knows...:/ Oh well, enough of this rant - surely someday they'll see the light. Until then, I'll just continue to scream in the desert. ;) Cheerz! Olafo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:07:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3198916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:07:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56A743D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:07:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kc.somaratne@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so252015rne for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:07:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=U8RVImxTScwYR38vfylPwkMIxiT4ZsW6tyul9KUnvhcWGXiPTaON+sMKW2TN0LH3xiLLmZYTB67oPu5f7qvOJYRcWXlkp3Rc77UfNA1cxiLy1GctDYlmD/uXOsMMCEEjYzFyzMet6GuIJPmka3HUHZ82S+HycGGmeYBQPr0Abio= Received: by 10.38.92.60 with SMTP id p60mr118215rnb; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.79.61 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:07:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9967ef07050107070731cee6b2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:07:10 +0800 From: KC Somaratne To: kris@obsecurity.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: possible issue with pam X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: KC Somaratne List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:07:12 -0000 On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:17:41PM -0500, Barry Hawkins wrote: >> List, >> Hello. I have recently begun to encounter an issue with changing >> passwords on my 5.1 installation. I haven't touched anything on it for >> a few months, and the last change-related activity I had were some >> portupgrade tasks to rid myself of the libintl.so.4 issue solved with >> "portupgrade -R gettext" back around September 2003. I am wondering if >> anyone has experienced an issue similar to mine. >> When I attempt to use passwd to change my password, I get the >> following upon successfully re-typing the password: >> >> passwd: entry inconsistent >> passwd: pam_chauthtok(): error in service module >> >> If anyone has insight on this I would be grateful. A search of the >> list for pam_chauthtok only revealed one person asking a similar >> question related to yppasswd. > > Compare your /etc/pam.d configuration against the sources in > /usr/src/etc/pam.d to make sure you have not damaged your pam > configuration by mis-merging changes. Also make sure you have no > /etc/pam.conf file, which was removed a long time ago. > > Kris Hi Kris, I've had a similar issue with a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE box for an account belonging to the 'wheel' group. I last changed the password for this account successfully roughly two months ago and since then I haven't changed anything at all. Now when I try to change the password for this account using root it prompts me with the below error message. root:/etc#passwd Changing local password for New Password: Retype New Password: passwd: entry inconsistent passwd: pam_chauthtok(): error in service module I get the same error message when trying to change the password using the same account as well. I have carefully verified that I did indeed enter the same string for the password verification. I have done the checks you have recommended in the above mail. The only differences are the /etc/pam.d has an additional file 'ftp'. The /usr/src/etc/pam.d contain two additional files Makefile & convert.pl. Appreciate any suggestions on what might be causing this behaviour and how I might be able to resolve the problem. Also, is this at all any sign of my system being compromised? Thanks in advance, -kc, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:13:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9DD16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:13:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C6143D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:13:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j07FD2Vv098018; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:13:20 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net In-Reply-To: <41DE9F26.6080700@taborandtashell.net> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <41DE9F26.6080700@taborandtashell.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:13:02 +0000 Message-Id: <1105110782.708.149.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:13:22 -0000 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 06:39 -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote: > Peter Risdon wrote: > > How about: > > > > #mv /sbin /usr/sbin > > #ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin > > #mv /root /usr/root > > #ln -s /usr/root /root > > Isn't this a bad idea if you ever have to boot to single user mode and > only have / mounted? > I have a system I need to hose this weekend anyway, so checked first. I moved the /root directory to /usr/root, then exited from su - and su still worked. Then I rebooted into single user mode and got a shell. So it seemed fine, if mildly inadvisable. Therefore, as far as I can see and I did check, you can boot into single user mode without a /root directory. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:15:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 716CB16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:15:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D7443D48 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:15:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j07FFKrk098025; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:15:29 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107094403.030a3d38@mail.face2interface.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> <1105108254.708.141.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107094403.030a3d38@mail.face2interface.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:15:20 +0000 Message-Id: <1105110920.708.152.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:15:38 -0000 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:48 -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > At 09:30 AM 1/7/2005, Peter Risdon wrote: > > > > > > # mv /sbin /usr/sbin > > > # ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin > > > # mv /root /usr/root > > > # ls -s /usr/root /root > > > >Typo here: ls instead of ln - that's why there's no link. > > Oh man, could I be any stupider? > > >Do you have physical access to the machine? > > Yep, haven't used the console in many months. Wonder what my Chucky screen > saver looks like nowadays. > > How do I get back on with root permissions from the console so I create the > needed link? Boot into single user mode. As I say in another post in this thread, I did check this before giving you the advice. Pre 5.x you hit any key, then type: boot -s at the boot prompt. In 5.x you get a menu. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:21:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C946B16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:21:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from roadster.maket.net.ua (eu-gw.maket.net.ua [193.108.226.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA6243D49 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:21:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nova.ft@gmail.com) Received: from earth.slavutich.kiev.ua (earth.slavutich.kiev.ua [193.108.226.2]) by roadster.maket.net.ua (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j07FJm3m014259 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:19:51 +0200 Received: from D080-02-010.maket.net (D080-02-010.maket.net [62.244.46.25]) by earth.slavutich.kiev.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06474 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:20:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:20:46 +0200 From: nova X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <13454892.20050107172046@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: nova List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:21:28 -0000 Hello freebsd-questions, Hello, I would like to know there is in FreeBSD a support of such file systems as RiserFS or XFS, this file systems supporting of Gentoo. Thank for attention ! -- Best regards, nova mailto:nova.ft@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:30:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6FC16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:30:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE7243D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:30:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [10.10.100.90] (unknown[216.113.237.29]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with ESMTP id <20050107153005113005p3g3e> (Authid: duanewinner); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:30:05 +0000 Message-ID: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:30:02 -0500 From: Duane Winner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD mailinglist Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:30:11 -0000 Hello, Has anybody been able to get OpenOffice installed from port on 5.3-RELEASE ? I am running 5.3-RELEASE-p2 (Xorg and JDK1.4.2p7 also installed) Yesterday, I attempted: # portinstall openoffice and chose editors/openoffice-1.1 14 hours later....... the output looked like it built cleanly, but during the install phase it bombed with: ./install.sh not found error code 127 Sigh......it's always OpenOffice that gives me headaches. I tried to just do a pkg_add -rv openoffice and that got me openoffice-1.1.2, which I guess I could live with until it gets fixed, but then I discovered during 'openoffice-1.1.2-setup' that characters were overlapping in all of the dialogs and menus. I don't know if that was a problem with my display or the character set/language, but I just ripped out the package in frustration. So discouraging. Cheers, DW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:39:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2AC16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:39:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710E343D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:39:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 39517 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 07:39:34 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 07:39:34 -0800 Message-ID: <41DEAD2B.4020105@taborandtashell.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:39:23 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Risdon References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <41DE9F26.6080700@taborandtashell.net> <1105110782.708.149.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> In-Reply-To: <1105110782.708.149.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:39:43 -0000 Peter Risdon wrote: >>>#mv /sbin /usr/sbin >>>#ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin >>> >>> >I have a system I need to hose this weekend anyway, so checked first. I >moved the /root directory to /usr/root, then exited from su - and su >still worked. Then I rebooted into single user mode and got a shell. So >it seemed fine, if mildly inadvisable. > >Therefore, as far as I can see and I did check, you can boot into single >user mode without a /root directory. > >Peter. > I was in reference to the /sbin moving to /usr/sbin. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:40:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01FD16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:40:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD46143D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:40:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([82.161.136.218]:10050 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmwDi-000Neh-S3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:40:10 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104791A9A7 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:40:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.111] (82-197-198-30.dsl.cambrium.nl [82.197.198.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7336B3701E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:40:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DEAD57.2070706@scii.nl> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:40:07 +0100 From: albi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD mailinglist References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> In-Reply-To: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:40:12 -0000 Duane Winner wrote: > Sigh......it's always OpenOffice that gives me headaches. > > I tried to just do a pkg_add -rv openoffice and that got me > openoffice-1.1.2, which I guess I could live with until it gets fixed, > but then I discovered during 'openoffice-1.1.2-setup' that characters > were overlapping in all of the dialogs and menus. I don't know if that > was a problem with my display or the character set/language, but I just > ripped out the package in frustration. there's more info here : http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ build-instructions, known problems and alternative downloads one other thing to try is running OOo through linux-emulation From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:41:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9172916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:41:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B0E43D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:41:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aeder@list.ru) Received: from [82.179.204.50] (port=62037 helo=gateway.my.home) by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp id 1CmwEa-0002Ie-00; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:41:04 +0300 Received: from [10.0.1.5] (megagame.my.home [10.0.1.5]) by gateway.my.home (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j07Ff2t2022413; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:41:02 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from aeder@list.ru) Message-ID: <41DEAE69.2030709@list.ru> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:44:41 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?0JDQu9C10LrRgdCw0L3QtNGAINCU0LXRgNC10LLRj9C90LrQvg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert William Vesterman References: <41DC9473.6020209@vesterman.com> In-Reply-To: <41DC9473.6020209@vesterman.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: source control question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:41:06 -0000 Robert William Vesterman wrote: > Does anyone know of a source control system that is not so > directory-centric? Most of the ones I've seen seem to have a base > assumption that, more or less, "directory" == "project". > But in reality, a directory could be a project, or part of a project, > or part of many projects, or merely structural (i.e. merely to > organize subdirectories, any of which may or may not be used in any > number of projects, each project of which is not necessarily > completely contained in the structural parent directory). And a > project may span many directories, each of which is not necessarily > anywhere near the others in the overall repository tree structure, and > whose repository tree "neighbors" are not necessarily parts of the > same project. > > For example, you may have top level repository things like "work" and > "personal", which are completely structural. And maybe "utils", which > you might use in both work and personal projects. And then if you use > some Java, and do the standard way of making packages > (com.mydomain.blah.blah.blah), you'll probably have a "java" directory > outside of "work" and "personal", having a whole tree of > subdirectories, any of which may be a complete project, part of a > project, part of many projects, et cetera. And a project may be > spread across "personal" and "java" and "utils" and any number of > other organizational things. > > I'm sure there are ways to bend things like Subversion into kind of > behaving the way I want, but are there any systems that are actually > designed with this concept in mind? > > Thanks, > > BOb Vesterman. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Suggest to take a look at Perforce (www.perforce.com). It is commercial, but have free two-user license, and you can obtain free license for open-source development. Personally, i have use it and it works very well for me. From my point of view, it have the following advantage: 1. It can be easily used by command-line oriented geeks. 2. It have a nice client-interface program for untrained point-and-click document-writers. All other advantages is described on it's site. Disadvantages: 1. Unicode (multilanguage) development is not perfect. As i know, the FreeBSD development was made in this SCM system. Best regards, Alexander Derevianko. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:41:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCA316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:41:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E00843D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:41:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (jptmwsfy@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07FfNFf024092; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:41:25 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107102842.01f00398@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:41:35 -0500 To: Peter Risdon From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <1105110920.708.152.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> <1105108254.708.141.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107094403.030a3d38@mail.face2interface.com> <1105110920.708.152.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:41:42 -0000 At 10:15 AM 1/7/2005, Peter Risdon wrote: >Boot into single user mode. This has become a problem. Took a working keyboard from another box and it won't work. Unless by some weird chance I should reboot first. But shouldn't the keyboard, if the ps2 port is working properly, at least have numlock and caps lock light up when pressing those keys? Anything else I can do here? I have moved /root to /usr/root and logged off root, stupidly. Now can't get back on as root to create the link back to /root. Am logged on as a member of group wheel, and don't have the other type of keyboard handy. Have one idea. Samba is set up and I can access from my windows workstation. If I change [look] path = / read only = yes public = yes to read only = no temporarily, just long enough to move /usr/root back to /root that'd do it, maybe? Only thing is, do I need to su - to restart samba? Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:45:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520BB16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:45:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74E943D54 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:45:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so41499wra for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:45:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=dmbUjzcplJDbPE25bhqx1ArNP7CNf0wcAf6YU77Ib2xtyvDSuOSdoFJrOOlc0DlUpCvilxFo4/daxDWD5H0tYWDyckFy6WUZmzSYwKe6BEzQ59pApa/8Fon7uT/OYhC+2LM/yNRqG53aP9nbqCRsFrV3tztQjtvIpOeJI6Tz4DQ= Received: by 10.54.6.43 with SMTP id 43mr243230wrf; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 07:45:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:45:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:45:00 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Vulpes Velox In-Reply-To: <20050106195039.4f09ef6a@fennec> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050106195039.4f09ef6a@fennec> cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: Re: slow sendmail starting on a lan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:45:02 -0000 On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:50:39 -0600, Vulpes Velox wrote: > Here I am running into is this... sendmail is taking for ever to start > on a box. My main server has no problem, but this box takes a long > time starting sendmail. > > Here are the related config files and ect for the box it is slow on. > The only difference is a this one has a few less services enabled on > it than server and the server has actual nameservers configured. This > box uses a dns proxy/cache on the server for dns. > > Any ideas? > > /etc/hosts > ::1 localhost localhost. > 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost. > > /etc/nsswitch.conf > group: nis files > hosts: nis files dns > networks: files > passwd: nis [unavail=continue] files > shells: nis files > > ypcat of hosts > 192.168.0.3 fennec fennec. > 192.168.0.2 vixen42 vixen42. > > /etc/resolve.conf > nameserver 192.168.0.2 > > /etc/rc.conf > defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" > hostname="fennec" > ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0" > inetd_enable="YES" > linux_enable="YES" > moused_enable="YES" > nfs_client_enable="YES" > nfs_server_enable="YES" > sshd_enable="YES" > usbd_enable="NO" > nis_client_enable="YES" > rpcbind_enable="YES" > nisdomainname="Vulpes" > inetd_enable="YES" > #lpd_enable="YES" This may be completely irrelevant, but I don't see sendmail_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:49:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD3316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:49:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6030843D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:49:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([82.161.136.218]:10056 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmwN3-0000KE-Pv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:49:49 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24AA61A9A7 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:49:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.111] (82-197-198-30.dsl.cambrium.nl [82.197.198.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815F53701E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:49:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DEAF96.9060400@scii.nl> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:49:42 +0100 From: albi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD mailinglist References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> <41DEAD57.2070706@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <41DEAD57.2070706@scii.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:49:50 -0000 albi wrote: > there's more info here : http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ > build-instructions, known problems and alternative downloads on the webpage above mentioned the link that says : "OOo 1.1.3 for 4.10 and 1.1.2 for 5.2.1-RELEASE" actually has OOo 1.1.3 for 5.3 for download From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:50:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA5816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:50:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail5.speakeasy.net (mail5.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA1D43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:50:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 15528 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 15:50:05 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Jan 2005 15:50:05 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1961B69; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:50:04 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Kevin Smith References: <41DE22AE.50101@adelphia.net> <41DE2457.20508@incubus.de> <41DE2FA3.4090500@adelphia.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Jan 2005 10:50:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <41DE2FA3.4090500@adelphia.net> Message-ID: <44is69me6s.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 32 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:50:06 -0000 Kevin Smith writes: > Matthias Buelow wrote: > > > Kevin Smith wrote: > > > >> How do I permit ordinary users to mound SCSI devices ? > >> > >> As suggested in the FAQ, section 9, I am able to allow members of > >> operator group mount the cdrom by setting sysctl -w vfs.usrmount=1 > >> This does not appear to work with SCSI devices. (ex: /dev/da0s2) > >> I get the error: > >> > mount -t msdos /dev/da0s2 ~/ipod > >> msdosfs: /dev/da0s2: Permission denied > > > > > > the last time I was bitten by that issue, the mount point had to be > > owned by the user (group write access apparently isn't enough). > > that's a bit of a problem with things like gui mounters and I hope > > that that behaviour will be changed sometime in the future. at > > least I can't see any security problems with a user being able to > > mount over a mountpoint where he only has group write access. > > > I thought that was the case, but I created a directory in the user's > home directory (as that user) and used it as the mount point and it > still does not permit it (see example above: ~/ipod is owned by the > user). It works with the cdrom device though- i can mount that as a > regular operator user. Sounds like the users don't have permissions on /dev/da0s2 but do have permissions on /dev/acd0. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 15:53:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B1A16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:53:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-07.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D77EB43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:53:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from outsidefactor@iinet.net.au) Received: (qmail 22800 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 15:53:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tyr) (203.217.67.1) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 15:53:54 -0000 From: "Chris Martin" To: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 02:53:41 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcT00Q8neS1eGQoUQ4quyZ3zdAZJeA== Message-Id: <20050107155355.D77EB43D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: gif interface with IPSec spontaneously stopping working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:53:57 -0000 I have to machines on a community wireless network with static IP addresses. These machines are used to form a VPN over the CWN, providing a secure routed path between two private networks. To secure the link I am using gif interfaces at each end to form the tunnel, and then we are using IPsec with a pre-shared key. This link seems very stable for a couple of days, but then it will just stop without any warning or errors. When I do a tcp dump at the physical interface (not the virtual gif interface) I see the ISAKMP messages being exchanged between the racoon daemons on each box: 02:20:20.948965 10.192.8.1.isakmp > 10.192.9.33.isakmp: isakmp: phase 1 I agg: [|sa] 02:20:20.966082 10.192.9.33.isakmp > 10.192.8.1.isakmp: isakmp: phase 1 R agg: [|sa] 02:20:21.036640 10.192.8.1.isakmp > 10.192.9.33.isakmp: isakmp: phase 1 I agg: (hash: len=20) 02:20:21.065342 10.192.8.1.isakmp > 10.192.9.33.isakmp: isakmp: phase 2/others I oakley-quick[E]: [encrypted hash] 02:20:21.069884 10.192.9.33.isakmp > 10.192.8.1.isakmp: isakmp: phase 2/others R oakley-quick[E]: [encrypted hash] 02:20:21.077303 10.192.8.1.isakmp > 10.192.9.33.isakmp: isakmp: phase 2/others I oakley-quick[E]: [encrypted hash] But then the data doesn't start to flow. If I go and destroy the gif interface and then re-create it with the same settings it comes back straight away, and I see the exact same pattern of isakmp packets. Can anyone suggest what could be wrong? The machines are running 5.2.1 p9 and p11(I am building the world and kernel for 5.3 on each box now), but assuming an upgrade to 5.3 doesn't resolve the issue, where can I start with the investigation to find why the interface is dropping out? Is there a way to get error logging or diagnostics out of gif interfaces? Does it sound more like an interface or IPsec issue? I hope someone can help! Thanks, Chris Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:09:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DF316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:09:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4127D43D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:09:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j07G9Nbt098148; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:09:23 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net In-Reply-To: <41DEAD2B.4020105@taborandtashell.net> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <41DE9F26.6080700@taborandtashell.net> <1105110782.708.149.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <41DEAD2B.4020105@taborandtashell.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:09:22 +0000 Message-Id: <1105114162.708.154.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:09:22 -0000 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 07:39 -0800, Tabor Kelly wrote: > Peter Risdon wrote: > > > > >>>#mv /sbin /usr/sbin > >>>#ln -s /usr/sbin /sbin [...] > > > I was in reference to the /sbin moving to /usr/sbin. > Yes, that's a very good point, which I'd missed completely. /sbin/mount Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:15:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715B016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:15:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C39B43D67 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:15:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (pD9E680E4.dip.t-dialin.net [217.230.128.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06D02F6DC; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:15:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DEB5B3.20901@incubus.de> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:15:47 +0100 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041124) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: madden@cms-stl.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Sun SPARC 20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:15:50 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Also, with a Sparc 20 try to load a copy of Solaris 2.6 rather than a later > copy, it will run faster and Sun still releases patches for it. Hmm, I don't know if that's worth it. I run Solaris 9 on an SS20 (2x 60MHz SM61, 224MB RAM) and am very satisfied with its performance. I have run Solaris 2.5.1 aswell as 7, 8 and 9 on various SS5 (all 110mhz MicroSparc, ~128mb RAM average), and Solaris 9 seemed to me to be the best performing system on that old hardware (of course it always pays to disable some of the crud that it normally starts at boot, but that holds for all SunOSen). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:26:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1420C16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:26:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from host70.201-252-23.telecom.net.ar (host70.201-252-23.telecom.net.ar [201.252.23.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFAFF43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chortleGrimm@medscartful.com) Received: from 176.114.34.140 by ; Message-ID: From: "botulinMejia" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:29:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: find her then meet her X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: botulinMejia List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:26:08 -0000 The plexiglas annale. Shejesse consecrate. He tragicomic crystalline colony cauchy campfire Bang a damsel 2nite : http://pillsloomth.com/sse/ stp plz : pillsloomth.com/xyp/ The musket approval comparison . She pdp salk pedigree cobol canticle . chain metronome stamina venal shrink bale . qatar contraption axiology . The cameramen checkup cenozoic pull jump . She folklore circus confectionery calorie retinue cassiopeia . And amaze hughes warmonger fair lovelace anorthosite . She pidgin benefit monkish .and o'brien aplomb desist sicken yap . The pappy ehrlich coleridge dunham opacity . downpour godwin shadflower audiovisual .and intention maggie mantic macromolecular ham . mansion yale asunder sprung daly . The wedge formulaic viscosity . She drunkard bismark gassy compote cody . The locutor passivate councilman . chartres ken paw emotional dixie positron . freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:30:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A450E16A4CF for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:30:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out011.verizon.net (out011pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E3E43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:30:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from acurtis@ieee.org) Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([68.160.169.150]) by out011.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20050107163003.GXAP4717.out011.verizon.net@[192.168.1.103]> for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:30:03 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <5FAD9AE2-60C9-11D9-A934-000A959EB894@ieee.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Alan Curtis Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:29:59 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out011.verizon.net from [68.160.169.150] at Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:30:03 -0600 Subject: netatalk, NFS, OS X and backup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:30:07 -0000 I need some advice about integrating my FreeBSD server with some Macs running OS X. I have a server running FreeBSD 5.3 with NFS and netatalk enabled, a Powerbook G4 running OS X 10.3.7 and they are connected through a wireless network. I used the Powerbook to administer the server using ssh, which works well. I would also like to use the server to backup files (for multiple users) from the Powerbook. I have played around with both NFS and netatalk (afpd) and both seem to be working, in that I can manually mount the shares on the Powerbook. I have got the NFS share to automount on the Powerbook but not the afp share. I can copy files to and from both the nfs and afp mounted shares, including resource forks. I have played with various backup utilities including rsync, psync and rdiff-backup with varying degrees of success. Some observations/questions 1. netatalk afp seems consistently and significantly faster than nfs. Is this to be expected or might I have a problem with nfs? If so how do I diagnose and fix it? 2. I would prefer to use nfs, because I can automount it on the Powerbook and run a cron (actually anacron) script to backup the multiple users. I haven't yet worked out how (or if) I can do this with afp (this is really a Mac question I know). 3. I would like to use a backup scheme which is automatic, invisible to the user, yet configured in a way that the archive can be navigated, and files appear in folders on the Mac finder in a consistent way (with resource forks set up correctly). All of this seems almost possible, yet I don't seem to have got it just right yet. Has anyone one any insight they can spread or experiences they can share of a similar set up? Alan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:32:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D7016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:32:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37A643D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:32:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j07GWjqk098210; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:32:45 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107102842.01f00398@mail.face2interface.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> <1105108254.708.141.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107094403.030a3d38@mail.face2interface.com> <1105110920.708.152.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107102842.01f00398@mail.face2interface.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:32:45 +0000 Message-Id: <1105115565.708.165.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:32:50 -0000 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 10:41 -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > At 10:15 AM 1/7/2005, Peter Risdon wrote: > > >Boot into single user mode. Scratch that. > > This has become a problem. Took a working keyboard from another box and it > won't work. Unless by some weird chance I should reboot first. > This happens, but don't just reboot. > > Have one idea. Samba is set up and I can access from my windows > workstation. If I change > That won't work. No - you ought to be able to su to root still. I checked this before the original answer because, although I wasn't recommending your directory moves, just telling you how to avoid linking individual binaries and files by doing the whole directory, I didn't even want to do that if I thought it would cause a prob like this. If you can boot onto a FreeBSD CDROM it'd be easy to fix this. Can you? Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:36:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E88416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:36:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BA543D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:36:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j07GXXUQ081024 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:33:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DEBA93.8060909@vilot.com> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:36:35 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: my lame attempt at a shell script... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:36:37 -0000 Eric F Crist wrote: > What is the point of the { } around some variables? It's not strictly necessary, except in some cases. i.e: m=34 echo $m You don't need it there. But you would want it here: f=/var/filename fname=${f//name/name2} It's when you need to differentiate the variable name from operations around it ... for want of a better explanation .... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:42:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586E416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:42:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [66.93.17.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE6443D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id j07GgbR25002 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:42:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:42:37 -0600 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050107104237.B24947@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Subject: FreeBSD trashed after installing Win98SE in lower partition - what to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:42:39 -0000 My questions have to do with the mess I have left after trying to do a dual-boot system with Win98SE and FreeBSD 4.9+. After running the FreeBSD system for nearly a year, and loving it, I finally got around to digging up the media I needed to do the Win98SE install, and my FreeBSD partition is now unbootable. This, obviously, is very disturbing. I'll start off with an overview, and then providing increasingly greater detail. 1) Install a placeholder C: partition of just under 2Gb for future Windows installation. 2) Install FreeBSD in the remaining 65% of the drive, run happily for a year 3) Fail in installing FreeBSD 5.2.1 in the placeholder Windows partition, rendering computer unusable (BootMgr just beeps) 4) Recreate the Windows boot partition type by hand - the C: drive is now gone, but FreeBSD works for weeks. 5) Finally get around to digging up and installing a copy of Windows 98SE. 6) Reinstall BootMgr, so helpfully ripped out by Windows. FreeBSD now blows up on trying to boot. Windows 98 works (well, as well as 98SE ever works). The questions I'm going to get to and need answers for, based on the details to follow are 1) What did I do wrong(other than using an MS-operating system, that's just a series of unfortunate events which are unavoidable)? 2) Do I have any viable options other than just reinstalling at this point (in which case, I might as well just go with 5.3 and be done with it)? 3) Will this happen again if I need to reinstall Win98se? What if I install XP? Do I need to make any adjustments to my fdisk partitions ward off problems in the future? 4) Is there any action I can take to help prevent others from experiencing the pain I have just unwittingly inflicted on myself? In a little greater detail, this is what I did: 1) Partition and format a "placeholder" C: drive of just under 2Gb (1980Mb) in the first part of the disk, and format a C: drive there. 2) Install FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE on the rest of the drive, and use CVSup on a different computer to track things for awhile (That's how I got to "stable+"). Run happily for a nearly a year, with KDE, OpenOffice, and other fun toys and productive tools. 3) Decide that, since I'm not using the Windows partition yet anyway, maybe it would be fun and productive to install FreeBSD 5.2.1 in that partition to see if some of the laptop-specific things that don't in FreeBSD 4 (like suspend/resume, automatic battery monitoring, etc). This process failed, because FreeBSD 5.2.1, even though it would BOOT from the CD-ROM drive, would not recognize it once the MFS system was up and running! I tried again with an NFS install after booting the MFS system, but that hung after having scribbled on the disk (still don't know why - gave up. This, incidentally, wiped out the original Win98SE "C" drive formatting, which may, ultimately, have been a part of my problems, or maybe it has nothing to do with it - any insight here would be appreciated.) 4) The system was now unusable. BootMgr would just beep at me, regardless of whether I picked F1 or F2. I used the bootable CD sysinstall program to manually change the partition type of the first back to "12" as it had been when when the placeholder DOS/Win98 filesystem lived there. The system was now, apparently, back to normal. Although there was nothing to boot in the F1 partition, F2 brought up my FreeBSD 4.9+ system just fine. I had had the DOS/Windows partition mounted as an msdos filesystem and I had to remove that from /etc/fstab, but otherwise, it seemed fine and I used it for weeks. 5) My son got some Windoze software for Christmas that would not run on our old Windoze desktop, so I finally got around to installing Windows 98SE, which installed and runs fine. 6) Windows so helpfully overwrote the MBR, eliminating the BootMgr. I used the bootable CD and sysinstall AGAIN to restore BootMgr 7) FreeBSD blows chunks when it tries to boot. That covers the sequence of events in more detail, so let's go deep with information and what I've done since. The hardware is a Compaq Armada M700 laptop with a Pentium-III 650, 320Mb of RAM, and a 6Gb hard drive (Toshiba MK6015MAP) with a kernel-reported geometry of c12416, h15, and s63, and a Compaq CRN-8241B CD-ROM. When I try to boot FreeBSD, this is what happens: BTX loader 1.00 TX version is 1.01 Console: internal video/keyboard BIOS drive A: is disk0 BIOS drive C: is disk1 BIOS 639kB/326592kB available memory FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 0.8 (john@dexter.starfire.mn.org, Tue Feb 17 15:17:21 CST 2004) Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf /kernel text=0x1a3573 data=0x2820c+0x1b8e8 syms=[0x4+02a7e0+0x4+0x31327] - Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. Booting [kernel]... / int=0000000d err=0000f18c efl=00010002 eip=0011f405 eax=002a6580 ebx=002e8074 ecx=00000000 edx=00027520 esi=00343b84 edi=002e8074 ebp=0009ea40 esp=00093a3c cs=0008 ds=0010 es=0010 fs=0010 gs=0010 ss=0010 cs:eip=07 00 00 00 c3 be 74 80-2e 00 8b 3d ec 65 2a 00 ss:esp=8c f1 11 00 7c 4a 09 00-47 95 00 00 00 00 00 80 BTX halted If I interrupt the boot process, and try one of my two other kernel files, they fail, though each one is different: ok unload ok load kernel.GENERIC /kernel.GENERIC text=0x32afd5 data=0x4e334+0x34a40 syms=[0x4+0x45c00+0x4+0x4e1fa] ok boot spinning bar, the Copyright and Timer messages, then a whole bunch of messages that fly by at screaming speed for a second (far too fast to perceive) then self-reboot ok unload ok load kernel.old /kernel.old yaddah yaddah... ok boot spinning bar - then BOOM! reboot - never even gets to the copyright or ID messages. I tried booting into fixit on the CD ROM, copying over /etc/group and /dev/MAKEDEV, creating that ad0s2a, ad0s2b, ad0s2c, ad0s2d, ad0s2e, ad0s2f, ad0s2g, and ad0s2h and then doing an "fsck -n /dev/ad0s2a" but the damage was rampant. I used "-n" for a first pass, just in case it was a configuration error. Though I'm beginning to regret it now, I did not use a separate /usr partition. By this method, I can fsck my "home"(ad0s2e) and "var"(ad0s2f) partition cleanly, with the original geometry, which makes me think that the geometry is workable, even though an fsck of of / is so disastrous. Though I was not clever enough to capture the fdisk table and geometry before all this went South, I do have what it was after Windows got done with it: Cylinders=12416 heads=15 sectors/track=63 (945 blks/cyl) The data for partition 1 is: sysid 12,(DOS or Windows 95 with 32 bit FAT, LBA) start 63, size 4052097 (1978 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ sector 1/ head 1; end: cyl 1023/ sector 63/ head 14 The data for partition 2 is: sysid 165,(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 4052160, size 7680960 (3750 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 1023/ sector 63/ head 255; end: cyl 1023/ sector 63/ head 14 The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: Obviously, the ending value of the CSH notation (btw - why is that CSH instead of CHS?) for partition 1 is bogus, as are the beginning and ending for partition 2. This lead to some concern on my part. The beginning of partition 2 is coded in an especially odd manner, to my thinking. This produces the above results while booting. FreeBSD fdisk says "Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1", so, thinking that Windows might played with the geometry, even though it's running in LBA mode, I tried 64 and 256 heads, respectively: Cylinders=2910 heads=64 sectors/track=63 (4032 blks/cyl) The data for partition 1 is: sysid 12,(DOS or Windows 95 with 32 bit FAT, LBA) start 63, size 4052097 (1978 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ sector 1/ head 1; end: cyl 1004/ sector 63/ head 63 The data for partition 2 is: sysid 165,(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 4052160, size 7680960 (3750 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 1005/ sector 1/ head 63; end: cyl 1023/ sector 63/ head 63 The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: Cylinders=728 heads=256 sectors/track=63 (16128 blks/cyl) The data for partition 1 is: sysid 12,(DOS or Windows 95 with 32 bit FAT, LBA) start 63, size 4052097 (1978 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ sector 1/ head 1; end: cyl 251/ sector 63/ head 63 The data for partition 2 is: sysid 165,(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 4052160, size 7680960 (3750 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 251/ sector 1/ head 64; end: cyl 727/ sector 63/ head 127 The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: Win98 works just fine for both of these, but the F2 for Bootmgr for FreeBSD just beeps at me. The fsck of ad0s2a starts out with a partially truncated INode at inum 16, then unknown file types an "unexpected soft update inconsistency" for 120-123, another partially untraced Inode at 143, then back to the unknown file type for 144-147, then partiall truncated 200, 224, and 260, unknown file type for 372-375, 396-399, 624-627, 648-651, 876-879, 900-903, 1128-1131, 1152-1155, 1380-1383, 1404-1407, 1632-1635, etc. etc, always with 4 inodes being trashed, skip 24, 4 trashed, skip 228, 4 trashed, skip 24, 4 trashed, skip 228, etc, all the way through i=21063. 4 skip 24, 4 skip 228. That must mean something, but I don't know what. It is also evident that the damage goes VERY DEEP into the filesystem, OR the filesystem parameters were damaged in such a way as to make fsck THINK that there is wide-spread damage. I could understand Win98 reaching slightly out of its partition, but not twenty-one thousand inodes worth! After that, we go into the "DUP/BAD NAME" phase, which, with so many inodes damaged (or believed to be damaged), is very long and extensive (/usr/local/include stuff, /usr/X11R6 stuff, /usr/local/share stuff, and /usr/compat/linux seem to be the hardest hit, but something is obviously wrong with the kernel images, as well). The BSD partitions look reasonable: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 3072000 0 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 3250*) b: 967616 6713344 swap # (Cyl. 7104*- 8127*) c: 7680960 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 8127*) e: 3379200 3072000 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 3250*- 6826*) f: 262144 6451200 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 6826*- 7104*) Well, the "fsize bsize and bps/cpg" all being zero seems a bit odd, but my current running FreeBSD 4.3 systems shows that on some of its perfectly-functioning disks, too, as well as the fact that I can cleanly fsck the e and f partitions. My current guess is that the filesystem parameters are damaged, and I don't know how to fix them. So, unless someone knows of an adjustment I can make to the filesystem my going idea is that I should just install 5.3 on top of whatever mess I have there, and move on. My concern is that I'll somehow cause of of this to happen again sometime due to the partitioning or other configuration. Just so you don't have to go all the way back to the top, here are my basic questions again: 1) What did I do wrong(other than using an MS-operating system, that's just a series of unfortunate events which are unavoidable)? 2) Do I have any viable options other than just reinstalling at this point (in which case, I might as well just go with 5.3 and be done with it)? 3) Will this happen again if I need to reinstall Win98se? What if I install XP? Do I need to make any adjustments to my fdisk partitions ward off problems in the future? 4) Is there any action I can take to help prevent others from experiencing the pain I have just unwittingly inflicted on myself? Any observations, information, or suggestions will be gratefully received. Thank you! -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:43:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799E416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:43:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD8F43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:43:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j07GhWow013512; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:43:33 +0200 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j07GhWkj002301; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:43:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j07GhWFH002300; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:43:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:43:32 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Tom Vilot Message-ID: <20050107164332.GB2249@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <41DEBA93.8060909@vilot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DEBA93.8060909@vilot.com> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: my lame attempt at a shell script... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:43:36 -0000 On 2005-01-07 09:36, Tom Vilot wrote: >Eric F Crist wrote: >> What is the point of the { } around some variables? > > It's not strictly necessary, except in some cases. i.e: > > m=34 > echo $m > > You don't need it there. > But you would want it here: > > f=/var/filename > fname=${f//name/name2} Or when characters adjacent to the variable name may be difficult to separate from the name itself: disk="ad0" slice="${disk}s1" partition="${slice}a" # echo "${disk} ${partition} ${slice}" - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:49:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD1F16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:49:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFF943D49 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j07GkmYf081533 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:46:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DEBDAE.30608@vilot.com> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 09:49:50 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <149.3c47467a.2f0eba4b@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <149.3c47467a.2f0eba4b@aol.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:49:52 -0000 Tm4528@aol.com wrote: >You guys couldnt even sweep up after the original FreeBSD team. What a >travesty. And apparently there aren't any technically capable >people using FreeBSD anymore, because they all seem very happy >with an O/S that is substantially slower than it was before. What a waste. > You're on AOL. You demonstrate your incredible technical savvy with each post from that address. Bwaaa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:55:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A7516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:55:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ashram.trlinks.com (ashram.trlinks.com [209.150.195.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01CE43D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:55:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rhavenn@rhavenn.net) Received: from [10.0.0.115] [66.173.105.250] by ashram.trlinks.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id ADF112FF0104; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:50:57 -0600 From: Henrik Hudson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:54:59 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20050107104237.B24947@starfire.mn.org> In-Reply-To: <20050107104237.B24947@starfire.mn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501071054.59191.rhavenn@rhavenn.net> cc: John Subject: Re: FreeBSD trashed after installing Win98SE in lower partition - what to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rhavenn@rhavenn.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:55:03 -0000 > The questions I'm going to get to and need answers for, based on the > details to follow are > 1) What did I do wrong(other than using an MS-operating system, that's > just a series of unfortunate events which are unavoidable)? As a rule of thumb don't install Windows AFTER a BSD / Linux. It really could care less about boot partitions. Windows2000 and XP you can modify the bootloader to load BSD, but I don't know about Win98. It's been a LONG time :) > 2) Do I have any viable options other than just reinstalling at > this point (in which case, I might as well just go with 5.3 > and be done with it)? Probably your partition is still there, it just doesn't know how to get to it. I don't remember the specifics, but you should be able to just rebuild the boot MBR. > 3) Will this happen again if I need to reinstall Win98se? What if > I install XP? Do I need to make any adjustments to my fdisk > partitions ward off problems in the future? In this day an age if you HAVE to have Windows, then XP is the only way to go. > 4) Is there any action I can take to help prevent others from > experiencing the pain I have just unwittingly inflicted on myself? Install Windows first and then BSD. If you have to install afterwards, the XP bootloader is pretty painless if you want to have a option to boot FreeBSD from it. Henrik -- Henrik Hudson rhavenn@rhavenn.net "There is a fine line between fishing and just standing on the shore like an idiot." -Unknown From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:58:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C143C16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:58:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avscan1.sentex.ca (avscan1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1693943D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:58:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.sentex.ca [127.0.0.1]) by avscan1.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j07GwsGT069115; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:58:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from avscan1.sentex.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (avscan1.sentex.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 69049-01; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:58:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by avscan1.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j07GwroR069092; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:58:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j07Gwkrw097870; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:58:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107115412.09ac6ce8@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:59:25 -0500 To: "Justin England" From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <003101c4f48b$bd981a30$152ea8c0@killer> References: <059701c4f222$d7064a20$152ea8c0@killer> <6dbpt0t06d771k3sta0pvokdot017sqha0@4ax.com> <003101c4f48b$bd981a30$152ea8c0@killer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at avscan1b cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware Esclade 7006-2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:58:56 -0000 At 02:37 AM 07/01/2005, Justin England wrote: >----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Tancsa" >To: "Justin England" >Cc: >Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 8:19 PM >Subject: Re: 3ware Esclade 7006-2 > > >>On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:01:31 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions >>you wrote: >>> >>>I have downloaded the CLI util and the 3dm2 web interface from 3ware.com >>>and have been trouble getting them to work. >> >>Its not totally obvious, but to connect to the 3dmd2, you need to talk >>to it via https, not http. So if you have it on the default port of >>888, try >>https://127.0.0.1 >>and not >>http://127.0.0.1 > > >Thanks for the tip... but still didn't work. I have set the port to 80, >just to make sure it wasn't a browser issue Use the default 888. It seems to get confused occasionally when its not on that port (although I have a few RELENG_4 boxes on non standard ports that work fine). I have a couple of boxes running RELENG_5 on the 7xxx and 8xxx without issue with the 3dm2 daemon What is the output of # openssl s_client -host 127.0.0.1 -port 888 Assuming you have it bound to all addresses and listening on the default port of 888. Once connected, type GET / HTTP/1.0 You should see GET / HTTP/1.0 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: 3ware/2.0 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 757 3ware 3DM2 - ns6.recycle.net - Summary <body> <p>This page uses frames, but your browser doesn't support them.</p> </body> closed ---Mike >, but it still doesn't work. Again, anybody have any success running the >3ware.com download of 3dm2 using a 7006-2 Esclade controller running the >5.3-RELEASE twe driver? >Thanks, > >Justin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 16:59:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFE916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:59:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B71743D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (zeyyphf@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07Gx6Ff027853; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:59:15 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107115026.03103bd0@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:59:07 -0500 To: Peter Risdon From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <1105115565.708.165.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> <1105108254.708.141.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107094403.030a3d38@mail.face2interface.com> <1105110920.708.152.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107102842.01f00398@mail.face2interface.com> <1105115565.708.165.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:59:35 -0000 At 11:32 AM 1/7/2005, Peter Risdon wrote: >On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 10:41 -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > > > > > This has become a problem. Took a working keyboard from another box and it > > won't work. Unless by some weird chance I should reboot first. > > > >This happens, but don't just reboot. Peter, are you saying that it's possible my keyboard isn't working because the console hasn't been used for a very long time? If so, why isn't rebooting the easiest thing to do? > > Have one idea. Samba is set up and I can access from my windows > > workstation. If I change > >That won't work. I realized that after sending the msg. Because Samba doesn't override the permissions on / which are rwxr-xr-x, right? What about toor? Isn't that a fallback to root? I've never understood what that was about... you're likely getting a good idea of my skill level about now. :) >No - you ought to be able to su to root still. But how? %su - Password: su: no directory % >I checked this before the original answer because, although I wasn't >recommending your directory moves, just telling you how to avoid linking >individual binaries and files by doing the whole directory, I didn't even >want to do that if I >thought it would cause a prob like this. Hey it's all a learning experience. Fact is it's not even keeping me from doing the work I was originally out to do... don't need root for that. What clobbered the space on my / - besides having too small an allocation - was using Perl's cpan shell. By deleting /root/.cpan recursively I've fixed that issue. The greater issue is, as has been said, learning to do this on another directory like /usr. >If you can boot onto a FreeBSD CDROM it'd be easy to fix this. Can you? I still have the 4.8 mini-iso the system was installed with. But I need the console to do this right? Any way I can be sure that the ps2 port/mobo isn't what's really shot? Or does it even matter? Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:02:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 9369816A4CF; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20050107170200.9369816A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2004/09/19 02:40:48 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? =================================================== Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In addition, the FreeBSD-newbies list caters specifically for people who are new to FreeBSD and may be having trouble getting used to the environment. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If you're new to FreeBSD, and the message is about your own relationship to FreeBSD, send the message to FreeBSD-newbies. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.5 2004/09/19 02:40:48 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:02:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 9B5DE16A4D0; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20050107170200.9B5DE16A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:02:00 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm constantly updating it. Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:08:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75BE16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:08:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA7143D72 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:08:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [10.10.100.90] (unknown[216.113.237.29]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005010717082011100j88nne> (Authid: duanewinner); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:08:20 +0000 Message-ID: <41DEC203.4010409@att.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:08:19 -0500 From: Duane Winner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: albi References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> <41DEAD57.2070706@scii.nl> <41DEAF96.9060400@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <41DEAF96.9060400@scii.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD mailinglist Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:08:29 -0000 Thanks! I was able to find OOo_1.1.3_FreeBSD53Intel_install.tbz and get that installed and working. I still had the bad user interface fonts, but I found that to be a problem with my xorg config, and I (mostly) fixed it. I sitll have some minor 'ticks' snuggled inside my r's, n's, e's and g characters, but not nearly as bad as before. I just started using Xorg over Xfree86 this week, and apparantly, font handling, or at least the ports are a little different. Just a couple more questions: If I keep my ports tree cvsup'd every day, I'm going to have: openoffice-1.1.3 < needs updating (port has 1.1.3_1) We generally do a "portupgrade -a" to upgrade ports unless /usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again and end up failing? Also, what are the folks up on ootranslation.services doing to get this package built that can't be done with the source for 1.1.3_1 on 5.3, why can't this port on 5.3, and if it is failing, shouldn't it be marked as 'broken' on 5.3? Thanks for any info. Cheers, DW albi wrote: > albi wrote: > >> there's more info here : http://porting.openoffice.org/freebsd/ >> build-instructions, known problems and alternative downloads > > > on the webpage above mentioned the link that says : > "OOo 1.1.3 for 4.10 and 1.1.2 for 5.2.1-RELEASE" > actually has OOo 1.1.3 for 5.3 for download > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:21:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178E916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:21:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A91B43D48 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:21:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from localhost.circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1])j07HKxKa098338; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:20:59 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) From: Peter Risdon To: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107115026.03103bd0@mail.face2interface.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> <1105108254.708.141.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107094403.030a3d38@mail.face2interface.com> <1105110920.708.152.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107102842.01f00398@mail.face2interface.com> <1105115565.708.165.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107115026.03103bd0@mail.face2interface.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:20:59 +0000 Message-Id: <1105118459.708.180.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:21:06 -0000 On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 11:59 -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > At 11:32 AM 1/7/2005, Peter Risdon wrote: > >On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 10:41 -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > > > > > > > > This has become a problem. Took a working keyboard from another box and it > > > won't work. Unless by some weird chance I should reboot first. > > > > > > >This happens, but don't just reboot. > > Peter, are you saying that it's possible my keyboard isn't working because > the console hasn't been used for a very long time? If so, why isn't > rebooting the easiest thing to do? Sort of. Sometimes, not often, just plugging a ps2 keyboard into a running machine won't work. It's also capable, even more rarely, of damaging the motherboard. [...] > > >No - you ought to be able to su to root still. > > But how? > > %su - > Password: > su: no directory > % I still have the machine on which I moved /root available and here's what happens: -bash-2.05b$ ls / COPYRIGHT dev kernel.GENERIC nonexistent stand bin dist kernel.old proc sys boot etc mnt razor-agent.log tmp cdrom home modules sbin usr compat kernel modules.old service var -bash-2.05b$ su Password: %ls / .cshrc compat kernel.GENERIC proc tmp .profile dev kernel.old razor-agent.log usr COPYRIGHT dist mnt sbin var bin etc modules service boot home modules.old stand cdrom kernel nonexistent sys %pwd /usr/home/peter % One thing that does occur to me: what is your user's shell and, if it isn't bash, do you have bash installed? And have you changed the root shell from csh? I suspect the latter. [...] > >If you can boot onto a FreeBSD CDROM it'd be easy to fix this. Can you? > > I still have the 4.8 mini-iso the system was installed with. But I need the > console to do this right? Any way I can be sure that the ps2 port/mobo > isn't what's really shot? Or does it even matter? The keyboard will almost certainly work after a reboot. If not, you've got other worries with that machine anyway. You can get a shell with root privileges from sysinstall and make your link. Move /sbin back, though. This was a bad thing to relocate. Peter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:25:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C3C16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:25:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gemcons.com (mail.gemcons.com [66.111.54.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A639B43D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:25:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kaosent@kewd.com) Received: (qmail 29781 invoked by uid 399); 7 Jan 2005 18:48:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kewdaeahnhd04i) (68.63.186.182) by mail.gemcons.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 18:48:33 -0000 From: "V Foulk" To: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:23:16 -0700 Message-ID: <000401c4f4dd$953bcad0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: IPFW and whois lookup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:25:22 -0000 Hello, I have recently setup IPFW on a test box, and found that (for the most part) it was pretty straight forward. Every rule and service on the box seems to work great, except for one problem I haven't been able to track down. Regardless of the settings, even when set to open as default with only the allow all from any to any rule, whois and hostname lookups fail. This problem prevented clamav from updating, and a whole slew of other minor issues that pop up in the logs. I was hoping someone may be able to point out something that I may have missed? When IPFW is enabled: When the service uses the local NS, a manual whois gives: whois: connect(): No route to host When the service uses the upstream NS, a manual whois gives: whois: com.whois-servers.net: hostname nor servname provided, or not known (NS as set in resolv.conf) The only way I can make the error 'go away' is to disable ipfw in rc.conf and reboot. I am certain that this is just a silly oversight on my part. The machine is running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p13, please let me know if there is any other information I can provide that will be useful. Thank you very much, in advance, for the help. VF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:30:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C63E16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:30:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-out.hotpop.com (smtp-out.hotpop.com [38.113.3.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E47043D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:30:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from personrp@hotpop.com) Received: from hotpop.com (kubrick.hotpop.com [38.113.3.103]) by smtp-out.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A956CCC9CB3 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 110-ccbh-131.ccbh.upmc.edu (110-ccbh-131.ccbh.upmc.edu [128.147.110.131]) by smtp-3.hotpop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76401315136 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:30:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Rod Person Organization: Open Source Beef To: Questions FreeBSD Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:30:58 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501071230.59428.personrp@hotpop.com> X-HotPOP: ----------------------------------------------- Sent By HotPOP.com FREE Email Get your FREE POP email at www.HotPOP.com ----------------------------------------------- Subject: GTK error with SciTE. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: personrp@hotpop.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:30:58 -0000 I'm trying to use SciTE and when ever I start it I get the following error.= =2E. I've tried this on 2 seperate FBSD machines one running 5.3 release and the= =20 other running a 5.3 rc 2 (I think). Both get the same error. I been trying = to=20 figure this out for sometime and can't seem to find anything about it.... SciTE (SciTE:98139): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for type=20 `Scintilla' is smaller than the parent type's `GtkContainer' class size (SciTE:98139): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtktypeutils.c: line 100 (gtk_type_new= ):=20 assertion `GTK_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (type)' failed (SciTE:98139): Gtk-WARNING **: invalid cast from (NULL) pointer to `(unknow= n)' (SciTE:98139): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for type=20 `Scintilla' is smaller than the parent type's `GtkContainer' class size Segmentation fault (core dumped) =2D-=20 Rod ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ "If you stay the same long enough you'll be in=20 style some day again." =A0Cren Dog=20 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:34:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEEF16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:34:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd2mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49D943D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:34:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr5so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.50])2004))freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:33:33 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml1so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.145]) by pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9Y00CWEJFX5K10@pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:33:33 -0700 (MST) Received: from procyon.nekulturny.org (S0106000c41b2b9a3.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.45.143]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I9Y00K7JJFXPD@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:33:33 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:33:33 -0700 From: Danny MacMillan In-reply-to: <1105100701.640.6.camel@chaucer> To: Mike Jeays Message-id: <20050107173333.GA865@procyon.nekulturny.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <41DDB2A7.8020001@wilderness.dyn.dhs.org> <41DE0F6F.3040303@taborandtashell.net> <1105100701.640.6.camel@chaucer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Laurence Sanford cc: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Remote upgrade possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:34:16 -0000 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 07:25:02AM -0500, Mike Jeays wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 23:26, Tabor Kelly wrote: > > > > I routinely use 'portupgrade -rRN' in xterm, in X-Windows to > > install new ports on my box. The second to last time I did this, > > one of the ports what was upgraded was xterm. And it worked! Can > > anybody explain to my why nothing bad happened? Am I running a > > risk when I do this? > > This seems pretty safe to me. When xterm gets invoked, the whole of the > code gets loaded into memory for execution, and there is no reason why > it would look at the disk copy again. If you upgrade the xterm binary, I haven't looked at the code, but your assertion is extremely unlikely. I really want to say "impossible" but as I said, I haven't looked at the code. If FreeBSD loaded entire executable images into RAM when starting new processes, it would perform very poorly. What is more likely is that the kernel keeps the image file open during program execution. When the xterm binary is replaced, the old binary is still on disk in its old location, it just doesn't have any directory entries pointing to it. Since the kernel still has the file open it won't be overwritten. Hence the kernel can and will still load pages from the old image. This is a function of the same behaviour that causes df and du output to differ in some cases. The lsof(8) utility seems to bear this out, as each process seems to keep each image (program and shared object files) open during execution. A new instance of xterm would use the new, upgraded binary. -- Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:36:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A583316A4D0 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:36:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fusion.vilot.net (vilot.com [64.246.32.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C0643D54 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (c-24-8-184-241.client.comcast.net [24.8.184.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by fusion.vilot.net (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j07HXr1K083390 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:33:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tom@vilot.com) Message-ID: <41DEC8B8.1040306@vilot.com> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:36:56 -0700 From: Tom Vilot User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041222) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SCSI HD issue ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:36:57 -0000 Picking up on that SCSI hardware problem I posted about earlier ... I'm in the process of installing a second HD which will, hopefully, be the replacement for the one I believe is flaky. I've installed the second drive. I used dd to copy over to each partition (Yes, I know this is not the right way to do that ... I'll be using dump or tar next time. Thanks to Subhro for pointing that out...) However ... Now I have the following situation: da2 is the "bad" disc that I am still using. da0 is going to be the new disc. Somehow, I have managed to replace da2s1a with da0s1a as the / partition: /dev/da0s1a on / (ufs, local) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) /dev/da2s1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/da2s1f on /usr (ufs, NFS exported, local, soft-updates) /dev/da2s1d on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) procfs on /proc (procfs, local) /dev/ad0 on /usr/share/archive (ufs, NFS exported, local) I'm not sure how to put it back. My fstab is: # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/da2s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/da2s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/da2s1e /tmp ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da2s1f /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da2s1d /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 /dev/acd1 /dvdram ufs rw,noauto 0 0 proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 /dev/ad0 /usr/share/archive ufs rw 0 0 I'm guessing I need to configure the boot loader .... but I'm a little unclear on how I do that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:40:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A49E16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:40:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F50443D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:40:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsduser@comcast.net) Received: from 204.127.197.111 (unknown[204.127.197.128](misconfigured sender)) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005010717400801400gir7ke>; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:40:08 +0000 Received: from [66.178.174.66] by 204.127.197.111; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:40:08 +0000 From: freebsduser@comcast.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:40:08 +0000 Message-Id: <010720051740.20483.41DEC977000C17EA0000500322070009539C0201079B010307020E@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Dec 17 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: YW5pbW90aW9uc0Bjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA== Subject: Network monitoring software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:40:13 -0000 Hiya folks, I'm looking for some network monitoring software. I've tried zabbix and jffnms but neither of them functioned after being configured or installing. If anybody has any success stories I would like to hear about any of them so I can look at other packages in ports net and net-mgmt. Thanks. ~Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:40:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A1516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:40:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FA6343D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:40:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robin@reportlab.com) Received: (qmail 3057 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 17:40:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 17:40:28 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 217.196.247.135 Message-ID: <41DEC98C.4000409@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:40:28 +0000 From: Robin Becker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robin Becker References: <41DE7615.6010502@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <41DE7615.6010502@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apachectl oddness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:40:31 -0000 Robin Becker wrote: > I'm running standard freeBSD 4.9 and am port upgrading apache2. I think > the old version was 2.50_3 and the new is 2.52_4. In the latest build I > have added WITH_THREADS=1 as I need this for mod_python. > > I notice now that apachectl startssl has problems reading the pass > phrase. I normally do this through the web using ssh/su and find that my > putty terminal gets locked up when I enter the phrase at the prompt. > > The apachectl startssl fails for the first pass phrase entry at the > console, but the second seems to work. I had to kill the previously hung > httpd process. > > Experimenting shows that > > echo "pass phrase" | apachectl startssl > > works fine even through ssh. Am I stupid or doing something wrong? Seems that the problem is caused by using WITH_THREADS=1. For various reasons I needed to reinstall without threads and now see that the pass phrase entry works fine. -- Robin Becker From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:42:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF77F16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:42:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF9643D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (ooukyyl@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07HfmFf008685; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:41:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107123523.01f4f298@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:42:00 -0500 To: Peter Risdon From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <1105118459.708.180.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <1105103142.708.136.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107091811.01f21c78@mail.face2interface.com> <1105108254.708.141.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107094403.030a3d38@mail.face2interface.com> <1105110920.708.152.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107102842.01f00398@mail.face2interface.com> <1105115565.708.165.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107115026.03103bd0@mail.face2interface.com> <1105118459.708.180.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:42:07 -0000 At 12:20 PM 1/7/2005, Peter Risdon wrote: > > > > >No - you ought to be able to su to root still. Live and learn. That worked, guess I can read up on su myself to understand the difference. >One thing that does occur to me: what is your user's shell and, if it >isn't bash, do you have bash installed? And have you changed the root >shell from csh? I suspect the latter. I'm not even aware of how to know the answers to these. > > >If you can boot onto a FreeBSD CDROM it'd be easy to fix this. No need now, is there? >The keyboard will almost certainly work after a reboot. That's good to know. >If not, you've got other worries with that machine anyway. True enough. >You can get a shell with root privileges from sysinstall and make your link. Got onto root with su, instead of su - which as you already know was failing on me. >Move /sbin back, though. This was a bad thing to relocate. Done. Now I have # df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 128990 54998 63674 46% / /dev/ad0s1f 257998 81790 155570 34% /tmp /dev/ad1s1e 2030062 936170 931488 50% /usr /dev/ad0s1e 257998 2122 235238 1% /var which should be fine for my present needs. Funny thing was that the Perl package I wanted to install with cpan - MIME::Lite is a standalone that doesn't apparently require cpan to install if you have the source, which I do. Darned thing didn't work out for me anyway so it's plan B. Been a plan b kinda day. Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:44:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6BB16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:44:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxout01.versatel.de (mxout01.versatel.de [212.7.146.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550FE43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:44:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krylon@gmx.net) Received: from mx01.versatel.de (mx01.versatel.de [212.7.146.4]) by mxout01.versatel.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j07Hhxh8016747; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:43:59 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.13] (i53875B34.versanet.de [83.135.91.52]) by mx01.versatel.de (MOS 3.5.5-GR) with ESMTP id CLK72953; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:43:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DECA79.80304@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:44:25 +0100 From: Benjamin Walkenhorst User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041231) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Duane Winner References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> In-Reply-To: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD mailinglist Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:44:03 -0000 I was too lazy to wait for the thin to build, so I downloaded the binary package. Works fine. =) Kind regards, Benjamin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:48:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9ED16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:48:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC1C43D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:48:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (zxoihac@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07HmUFf015875 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:48:31 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107124651.01f4f528@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:48:42 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Marty Landman Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: make sudo failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:48:46 -0000 A previous thread mentioned sudo as a good way for me to get out of the habit of su - so much. I just tried to install and this is what I got, don't know what to make of it (pardon the pun) or what to do next. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ # make build && make install && rehash && which sudo /usr/sbin/sysctl: not found "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 797: warning: "/usr/sbin/sysctl -n kern.osreldate" returned non-zero status >> sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >> Attempting to fetch from http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/. fetch: http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: Not Found >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/. fetch: ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.stikman.com/pub/sudo/. Receiving sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz (333074 bytes): 100% (ETA 00:00) 333074 bytes transferred in 112.4 seconds (2.89 kBps) ===> Extracting for sudo-1.6.6_1 md5: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:49:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F6616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:49:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from haven.hypernet.ch (hypernet.ch [212.55.218.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358EF43D53 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@hypernet.ch) Received-SPF: pass (haven.hypernet.ch: localhost is always allowed.) client-ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=; helo=localhost; Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by haven.hypernet.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j07Hn0BC002996; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:49:00 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from chris@hypernet.ch) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:49:00 +0100 (MET) From: Christoph Steigmeier X-X-Sender: chris@haven To: "O. Hartmann" In-Reply-To: <41DD5211.7040807@uni-mainz.de> Message-ID: <20050107184149.T59714@haven> References: <41DD3326.4050908@uni-mainz.de> <200501062329.48692.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <41DD5211.7040807@uni-mainz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1; AVE: 6.29.0.5; VDF: 6.29.0.52; host: haven.hypernet.ch) cc: Daniel O'Connor cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: copying from DVD drive causes crash: vm_fault: pager readerror, pid 13421 (cp) on FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:49:14 -0000 Hello I observe a similiar behaviour here on an ASUS Laptop with a MATSHITAUJ-831D/1.00 DVD-RW Drive. Altough only with DVD's, but not with CD's. Installed is FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2. The only difference to the GENERIC kernel is that I added the device atapicam to the kernel. The failure occures with both way accessing the drive (acd0 and cd0). If you need more output, pls. tell me. Chris On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, O. Hartmann wrote: > Daniel O'Connor schrieb: > >> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:16, O. Hartmann wrote: >> >>> Doing dd from the DVD drive (NEC ND 3500AG/2.18) fails in a corrupt >>> image afterwards, copying with 'cp' from a inserted CD triggers the >>> shown error and box dies immediately: >>> >>> >>> Jan 6 12:17:20 edda kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension >>> Jan 6 12:17:50 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST >>> asc=0x64 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>> Jan 6 12:18:07 edda last message repeated 3 times >>> Jan 6 12:29:44 edda kernel: cd9660: RockRidge Extension >>> Jan 6 12:30:54 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>> asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>> Jan 6 12:30:54 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) >>> Jan 6 12:30:58 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>> asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>> Jan 6 12:30:58 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) >>> Jan 6 12:31:01 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>> asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>> Jan 6 12:31:01 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) >>> Jan 6 12:31:08 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>> asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4 >>> Jan 6 12:31:08 edda kernel: vm_fault: pager read error, pid 13421 (cp) >>> Jan 6 12:31:19 edda kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BIG MEDIUM ERROR >>> asc=0x11 ascq=0x00 error=4>> >>> Same happens when trying to to a 'tar ztf file.foo' (tar archive located >>> on DVD) -> FreeBSD dies and freezes immediately. >>> >> >> Does it panic or hang? >> >> The DVD has errors on it which is why you can't read it.. Obviously the OS >> crashing when presented with bad media is not a good thing :) >> >> > The box hang. > The media is all right, I tried it on a FreeBSD 4.10 box and a Windows box > (equipted with the > same DVD-RW drive, running on a different hardware platform). > > Writing 'clear' images to the drive results in corrupted media, either DVD > and/or CD-R/W. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:53:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53D416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:53:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web-17.seeweb.it (web-17.seeweb.it [212.25.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA5243D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:53:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matteo@tilde.it) Received: from [80.181.113.222] (host222-113.pool80181.interbusiness.it [80.181.113.222]) by web-17.seeweb.it (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id j07HaqK02118; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:36:52 +0100 Message-ID: <41DEDA9C.903@tilde.it> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:53:16 +0000 From: Matteo Santori User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041204) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marty Landman References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107124651.01f4f528@mail.face2interface.com> In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107124651.01f4f528@mail.face2interface.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make sudo failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:53:30 -0000 Marty Landman wrote: > A previous thread mentioned sudo as a good way for me to get out of > the habit of su - so much. I just tried to install and this is what I > got, don't know what to make of it (pardon the pun) or what to do next. > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > # make build && make install && rehash && which sudo > /usr/sbin/sysctl: not found > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 797: warning: "/usr/sbin/sysctl -n > kern.osreldate" returned non-zero status > >> sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > >> Attempting to fetch from http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/. > fetch: http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: Not Found > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/. > fetch: ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.stikman.com/pub/sudo/. > Receiving sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz (333074 bytes): 100% (ETA 00:00) > 333074 bytes transferred in 112.4 seconds (2.89 kBps) > ===> Extracting for sudo-1.6.6_1 > md5: not found > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Marty > > > Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 > Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml > Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Problem releated with some md5 control. Try to check what's wrong or try to get the pkg. What is interesting is ../usr/sbin/sysctl: not found "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 797: warning: "/usr/sbin/sysctl -n kern.osreldate" returned non-zero status why it's trying to search sysctl is such path? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 17:56:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF88016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:56:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A02743D58 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:56:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([82.161.136.218]:9845 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmyLF-000KmK-Jz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:56:05 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEE11A9A7 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:56:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.111] (82-197-198-30.dsl.cambrium.nl [82.197.198.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9B53701E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:56:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DECD31.7020107@scii.nl> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:56:01 +0100 From: albi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD mailinglist References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> <41DEAD57.2070706@scii.nl> <41DEAF96.9060400@scii.nl> <41DEC203.4010409@att.net> In-Reply-To: <41DEC203.4010409@att.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:56:07 -0000 Duane Winner wrote: > Thanks! I was able to find OOo_1.1.3_FreeBSD53Intel_install.tbz and get > that installed and working. nice > I still had the bad user interface fonts, but I found that to be a > problem with my xorg config, and I (mostly) fixed it. I sitll have some > minor 'ticks' snuggled inside my r's, n's, e's and g characters, but not > nearly as bad as before. I just started using Xorg over Xfree86 this > week, and apparantly, font handling, or at least the ports are a little > different. > i'm using 5.3 on the desktop (daily), and i have no problems with it at all, but then again i've installed this from a 5.3 RELEASE cdrom, and that has xorg as default perhaps you have to reinstall (portupgrade -rf) a few fonts ? > Just a couple more questions: > If I keep my ports tree cvsup'd every day, I'm going to have: > openoffice-1.1.3 < needs updating (port has 1.1.3_1) > > We generally do a "portupgrade -a" to upgrade ports unless > /usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice > discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again and > end up failing? a dirty solution is to press ctrl-c when OOo tries to build, i know from experience that portupgrade simply continues with the rest without any complaints :) but i assume in the Makefile (in the OOo-portsdir) one can put an IGNORE somewhere From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 18:09:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBFB16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:09:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2019F43D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:09:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1CmyYf-0003hK-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:09:57 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16862.53287.321539.996991@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:08:39 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:09:58 -0000 Marty Landman writes: > Ok, I've cleared half the space by rm -r /root/.cpan. yay! > # du -x / | sort -rn | head -15 > 60093 / > 15052 /root > 13750 /root/nmap-3.50 Did you somehow install nmap under root, or use it as the root build directory? And if so, was that intentional? Make sure nmap is installed in the appropriate place, and the delete this? > 6318 /modules.old Assuming your system is stable, you can probably delete this. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 18:16:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3A516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:16:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stewie.obfuscated.net (stewie.obfuscated.net [66.118.188.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B6B43D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:16:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@obmail.net) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (653259hfc120.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.59.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by stewie.obfuscated.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53F36104; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:16:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20050107173333.GA865@procyon.nekulturny.org> References: <41DDB2A7.8020001@wilderness.dyn.dhs.org> <41DE0F6F.3040303@taborandtashell.net> <1105100701.640.6.camel@chaucer> <20050107173333.GA865@procyon.nekulturny.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <2EBCB4AD-60D8-11D9-B88F-00039367611E@obmail.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: M Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:15:59 -0500 To: Danny MacMillan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: Mike Jeays cc: Laurence Sanford cc: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Remote upgrade possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:16:48 -0000 On Jan 7, 2005, at 12:33 PM, Danny MacMillan wrote: > I haven't looked at the code, but your assertion is extremely unlikely. > I really want to say "impossible" but as I said, I haven't looked at > the code. If FreeBSD loaded entire executable images into RAM when > starting new processes, it would perform very poorly. What is more > likely is that the kernel keeps the image file open during program > execution. When the xterm binary is replaced, the old binary is still > on disk in its old location, it just doesn't have any directory > entries pointing to it. Since the kernel still has the file open it > won't be overwritten. Hence the kernel can and will still load > pages from the old image. This is a function of the same behaviour > that causes df and du output to differ in some cases. > > The lsof(8) utility seems to bear this out, as each process seems to > keep each image (program and shared object files) open during > execution. > > A new instance of xterm would use the new, upgraded binary. > When you run a program the program that runs the new one makes a copy of itself in the process table and they share code pages. This is done through fork(). At that point the new process, called the child, calls one of the exec() function calls which in turn calls a single syscall, execve(). execve() uses namei() to get the vnode pointer. Each vnode pointer has three ference counts, v_usecount, v_holdcnt and v_writecount. A vnode is not recycled until both the usecount and holdcnt are 0. When namei() is called it calls VREF() which is vref() which does vp->v_usecount++; so if it's running the page can't be recycled from a point in time before the program actually is loaded in to memory. execve() calls exec_map_first_page(). Without tearing this apart I'm going to guess that this memory maps the first page of text (code) through the VM subsystem as evidenced by the conspicuous calls to vm_page*() functions so I'd conclude the file is memory mapped. Presuming it turns out the command you're calling isn't a shell script or other script execve() cleans up the environment so file descriptors and signal handlers don't get shared, the processes environment is setup, lets the calling (forking) process know it can continue on it's merry way, sets uid/gid if necessary/possible, and it looks like the scheduler takes care of the rest (I'll be honest here, the code seems to trail off here so far as I can tell in to parts that are jumped to in case of error). In any case we have a increased usecount. Now we are going to unlink that file and create a new one. After some basic checks (you can't remove the root of a file system for example) unlink() will call VOP_REMOVE() which calls vrele() which deincrements the usecount when it's greater than one, which in this case it MUST be because the xterm process has one count on it and the file entry has another (hard links to the file may have additional counts on it). Therefore it appears that you can unlink the file, it will remain on the disk to serve the memory mapped image used for the running process and install a new copy. I'm going to presume when a process exits it de-increments the usecount for the vnode, which, when 0 should put the page on the free list. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 18:19:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289A616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:19:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB1743D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:19:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.64.9]) by mta11.adelphia.netESMTP <20050107181950.NSIM1403.mta11.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:19:50 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E9C8B519; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:19:27 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:19:26 -0500 From: Parv To: Marty Landman Message-ID: <20050107181926.GA83624@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Marty Landman , afabian@austin.rr.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> cc: afabian@austin.rr.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Moving *directories*, like sbin, root, of / to /usr (was Re: clearing space) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:19:52 -0000 in message <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com>, wrote Marty Landman thusly... > > Let's say I want to > > mv /sbin /usr/sbin > mv /root /usr/root > > How problematic can this become? You should know there already is one /usr/sbin ... which will be late if you had already mv(1)'d as root w/o -i option. You should not have any problems moving /root to elsewhere other than those related to mount & single user, well, use. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 18:28:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0733916A4CE; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:28:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from recife.ipadnet.com.br (recife.ipadnet.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C2443D54; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:28:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from marioLobo ([200.249.204.142]) by recife.ipadnet.com.br (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j07IZ8wT021956; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:35:08 -0300 From: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Organization: IPAD To: jose@hostarica.com Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:32:47 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41DEAB9F.22561.17E9113@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <1105116981.2870.0.camel@jose.hostarica.net> References: <41DE5113.24978.1CDD38@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: jose@hostarica.com Subject: Re: netstat odd behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:28:37 -0000 Tried that before posting. this is what I get Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) udp4 0 0 *.514 *.* On 7 Jan 2005 at 10:56, Jose Hidalgo Herrera wrote: > > What about > netstat -anf inet > > > El vie, 07-01-2005 a las 09:06 -0300, mario.lobo@ipad.com.br escribi=F3:= > > Hello; > > On all installations of FreeBSD I=B4ve ever done in the past, > > netstat -an > > displays LISTENing servers and any tcp connection in any state. > > On the 5.3 I have installed here ( updated to RELENG_5_3 + build/ins= tallworld ), this command only > shows only this; > > -------------------------------------------- > Active Internet connections (including servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (= state) > udp4 0 0 *.514 *.* > Active UNIX domain sockets > Address Type Recv-Q Send-Q Inode Conn Refs Nextref Ad= dr > c38d01a4 stream 0 0 c3de8738 0 0 0 /d= b/mysql/mysql.sock > c38d1000 stream 0 0 c3883c60 0 0 0 /v= ar/run/devd.pipe > c38d0ec4 dgram 0 0 c3883210 0 0 0 /v= ar/run/log > -------------------------------------------- > > I have ssh, sendmail, ftpd and mysql daemons running, LISTENing and = WORKING. > > Would anybody know why they are not showing on the output of netstat= ? > > Thanks, > > -- //| //|| // | // || -//--//---|| ARIO LOBO // // || --------------------------------- mario.lobo@ipad.com.br http://www.ipad.com.br From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 18:34:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD7D16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:34:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6C943D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:34:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (noydkazu@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07IYIFf002018; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:34:19 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107133230.01f4fb90@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:34:30 -0500 To: Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <16862.53287.321539.996991@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050106184116.01f2aa80@mail.face2interface.com> <20050107053638.GE27020@turingmachine.mentalsiege.net> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107074632.03093500@mail.face2interface.com> <16862.53287.321539.996991@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: clearing space X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:34:35 -0000 At 01:08 PM 1/7/2005, Robert Huff wrote: > Did you somehow install nmap under root, or use it as the root >build directory? And if so, was that intentional? Dunno, dunno, and obviously unintentional since I don't know anything about it. As much as I hate to plead ignorance in this case anything less would be lying. >Make sure nmap is installed in the appropriate place, and the delete this? What's nmap and where should it be and how do I install it properly? > > 6318 /modules.old Delete this after fixing nmap? Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 18:37:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F51016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:37:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gaia.hmdnsgroup.com (gaia.hmdnsgroup.com [63.247.134.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14BB43D48 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:37:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mgv@zago.com.mx) Received: from [201.128.30.215] (helo=orion) by gaia.hmdnsgroup.com with smtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.43) id 1Cmyyw-0008Sg-OI for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:37:07 -0500 Message-ID: <001201c4c4f8$cc6a7980$400cdfdf@orion> From: "Martin Gonzalez" To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: mgv@zago.com.mx X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gaia.hmdnsgroup.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - zago.com.mx X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: About ports dist X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:37:01 -0000 X-Original-Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 12:36:59 -0600 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:37:01 -0000 Hi.. I have 2 very quick questions/comment about installation from the = FreeBSD CDs, and X-window: When I try to install the X.org distribution, it sends an error message = that says it cannot find the packages/INDEX on the specified media. I = checked on the CD 2, and there it is, the full ports collection, but the = index file is named INDEX-5 instead of INDEX, so I think it might be the = problem. If someone knows how to install all ports from the CDs, can you tell me = to this mail, I will be very thankful for it..! The second question is: when I execute 'Xorg' at the prompt, it starts = the graphics display, but I have no windows nor desktops, nothing but = the mouse pointer. Do I have to install something else ? (Maybe from = ports collection - which one?) I am relatively new to UNIX, my platform is i386, I downloaded the ISO = CD images from the ftp site and I burned those images to the CDs (I see = the files/dirs on the CD, not the ISO file itself) Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 18:37:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4AD16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:37:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66F843D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:37:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (cfwlcon@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07Ib7Ff004456; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:37:08 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107133514.037e2810@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:37:19 -0500 To: Matteo Santori From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <41DEDA9C.903@tilde.it> References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107124651.01f4f528@mail.face2interface.com> <41DEDA9C.903@tilde.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make sudo failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:37:25 -0000 At 01:53 PM 1/7/2005, Matteo Santori wrote: >Marty Landman wrote: > >>A previous thread mentioned sudo as a good way for me to get out of the >>habit of su - so much. I just tried to install and this is what I got, >>don't know what to make of it (pardon the pun) or what to do next. >> >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >># make build && make install && rehash && which sudo >>/usr/sbin/sysctl: not found >>"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 797: warning: "/usr/sbin/sysctl -n >>kern.osreldate" returned non-zero status >> >> sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. >> >> Attempting to fetch from http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/. >>fetch: http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: Not Found >> >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/. >>fetch: ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: >>File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >> >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.stikman.com/pub/sudo/. >>Receiving sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz (333074 bytes): 100% (ETA 00:00) >>333074 bytes transferred in 112.4 seconds (2.89 kBps) >>===> Extracting for sudo-1.6.6_1 >>md5: not found >>*** Error code 127 >> >>Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. >> >>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >Problem releated with some md5 control. Try to check what's wrong or try >to get the pkg. > >What is interesting is > >./usr/sbin/sysctl: not found >"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 797: warning: "/usr/sbin/sysctl -n >kern.osreldate" returned non-zero status > >why it's trying to search sysctl is such path? Matteo, not aware of how to deal with this. Could you please be more specific? In case this may be related, I'm running 4.8 installed from the mini-iso and have never updated the ports collection. Am on dial up so it always seemed too duanting a task. Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 18:48:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4AA16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:48:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F55343D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([82.161.136.218]:9855 helo=mail.aseed.antenna.nl) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cmz9z-000PfZ-IL; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:48:31 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by mail.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41EF1A9A7; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:48:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.111] (82-197-198-30.dsl.cambrium.nl [82.197.198.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0D53701E; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:48:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DED97A.4090109@scii.nl> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:48:26 +0100 From: albi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mgv@zago.com.mx, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <001201c4c4f8$cc6a7980$400cdfdf@orion> In-Reply-To: <001201c4c4f8$cc6a7980$400cdfdf@orion> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: About ports dist X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:48:32 -0000 Martin Gonzalez wrote: > When I try to install the X.org distribution, it sends an error message that says it cannot find the packages/INDEX on > the specified media. I checked on the CD 2, and there it is, the full ports collection, but the index file is named INDEX-5 > instead of INDEX, so I think it might be the problem. > > If someone knows how to install all ports from the CDs, can you tell me to this mail, I will be very thankful for it..! > if your machine is connected to the internet you can try : cd /usr/ports ; make fetchindex > The second question is: when I execute 'Xorg' at the prompt, it starts the graphics display, but I have no windows nor desktops, > nothing but the mouse pointer. Do I have to install something else ? (Maybe from ports collection - which one?) try : Xorg -configure that should give you a temp. config-file to test, and if that is working fine copy that config-file to /etc/X11/xorg.conf (make sure you install a windowmanager (e.g. icewm, fluxbox) or a desktop-environment like e.g. KDE, Gnome or xfce4) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:27:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B6B16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:27:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A600043D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b134.otenet.gr [212.205.244.142]) j07JRNpr013324; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:27:35 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j07JQvkL001014; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:26:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j07JQvJE001013; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:26:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:26:57 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Message-ID: <20050107192656.GA965@gothmog.gr> References: <41DE5113.24978.1CDD38@localhost> <41DEAB9F.22561.17E9113@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DEAB9F.22561.17E9113@localhost> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: jose@hostarica.com Subject: Re: netstat odd behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:27:45 -0000 On 2005-01-07 15:32, mario.lobo@ipad.com.br wrote: >On 7 Jan 2005 at 10:56, Jose Hidalgo Herrera wrote: >>El vie, 07-01-2005 a las 09:06 -0300, mario.lobo@ipad.com.br escribi?: >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> Active Internet connections (including servers) >>> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) >>> udp4 0 0 *.514 *.* >>> Active UNIX domain sockets >>> Address Type Recv-Q Send-Q Inode Conn Refs Nextref Addr >>> c38d01a4 stream 0 0 c3de8738 0 0 0 /db/mysql/mysql.sock >>> c38d1000 stream 0 0 c3883c60 0 0 0 /var/run/devd.pipe >>> c38d0ec4 dgram 0 0 c3883210 0 0 0 /var/run/log >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> >>> I have ssh, sendmail, ftpd and mysql daemons running, LISTENing >>> and WORKING. Would anybody know why they are not showing on the >>> output of netstat? >> >> What about >> netstat -anf inet > > Tried that before posting. this is what I get > > Active Internet connections (including servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) > udp4 0 0 *.514 *.* Are you sure you don't have a kernel and userland that are out of sync? You _did_ update both as the instructions in src/UPDATING suggest, right? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:28:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AF116A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:28:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862DB43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:28:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkinkade@fastmail.fm) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A00EC4ADC2; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:28:54 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: rqlnKbOsNkdhCVhKdR6NBw 1105126132 Received: from gentoo-npk.bmp.ub (unknown [206.27.244.136]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0EA25535; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:28:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from nkinkade by gentoo-npk.bmp.ub with local (Exim 4.21) id 1Cmzn2-0007Cw-4x; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:28:52 -0600 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:28:52 -0600 From: Nathan Kinkade To: V Foulk Message-ID: <20050107192851.GK3639@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub> Mail-Followup-To: V Foulk , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000401c4f4dd$953bcad0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2XUWoe1nmt7t49kG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000401c4f4dd$953bcad0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW and whois lookup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:28:57 -0000 --2XUWoe1nmt7t49kG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 10:23:16AM -0700, V Foulk wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have recently setup IPFW on a test box, and > found that (for the most part) it was pretty straight > forward. Every rule and service on the box seems to work > great, except for one problem I haven't been able to track > down. Regardless of the settings, even when set to open as > default with only the allow all from any to any rule, whois and > hostname lookups fail. >=20 > This problem prevented clamav from updating, and a whole=20 > slew of other minor issues that pop up in the logs. I was hoping > someone may be able to point out something that I may have missed? >=20 > When IPFW is enabled: > When the service uses the local NS, a manual whois gives: > whois: connect(): No route to host >=20 > When the service uses the upstream NS, a manual whois gives: > whois: com.whois-servers.net: hostname nor servname provided, or not known >=20 > (NS as set in resolv.conf) >=20 > The only way I can make the error 'go away' is to disable ipfw in rc.conf > and reboot. >=20 > I am certain that this is just a silly oversight on my part. > The machine is running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p13, please let me know if > there > is any other information I can provide that will be useful. Thank you very > much, > in advance, for the help. >=20 > VF The output of `ipfw list` would be very helpful. Nathan --2XUWoe1nmt7t49kG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB3uLzO0ZIEthSfkkRAu5PAJ40sod5QUFVwft9mDUFLAEYCcMXRACggxkv lRxC1psyQF5RXySfpWNdWmI= =yJqa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2XUWoe1nmt7t49kG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:34:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B7816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:34:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk (heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk [62.41.128.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B4B43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:34:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nbco@screaming.net) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([217.51.144.174])j07HYqS02577 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:34:53 GMT From: nbco To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:34:19 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> <41DEC203.4010409@att.net> <41DECD31.7020107@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <41DECD31.7020107@scii.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501071934.19722.nbco@screaming.net> Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: nbco@screaming.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:34:28 -0000 On Friday 07 January 2005 17:56, albi wrote: > Duane Winner wrote: > > We generally do a "portupgrade -a" to upgrade ports unless > > /usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice > > discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again > > and end up failing?> > a dirty solution is to press ctrl-c when OOo tries to build, i know > from experience that portupgrade simply continues with the rest > without any complaints :) Alterntively, set openoffice to be held in pkgtools.conf in /usr/local/etc. I have added the following line: HOLD_PKGS = ['openoffice-*'] This entry will prevent portupgrade attempting to upgrade the port. If you are using portmanager see this thread to see how to avoid portmanager attempting to upgrade a held port: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-January/070055.html Hope this helps .nbco > Portupgrade honours this setting. > > but i assume in the Makefile (in the OOo-portsdir) one can put an > IGNORE somewhere > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:35:18 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE7B16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:35:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BEA43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:35:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkinkade@fastmail.fm) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1A8C4ACCB; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:35:14 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: jT7GDelco1jNVK3e11U0yA 1105126512 Received: from gentoo-npk.bmp.ub (unknown [206.27.244.136]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12D525535; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:35:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from nkinkade by gentoo-npk.bmp.ub with local (Exim 4.21) id 1CmztA-0007DN-Km; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:35:12 -0600 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:35:12 -0600 From: Nathan Kinkade To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Message-ID: <20050107193512.GL3639@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub> Mail-Followup-To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41DE5113.24978.1CDD38@localhost> <41DEAB9F.22561.17E9113@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="smEuXhZLKnMjT4Ht" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DEAB9F.22561.17E9113@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netstat odd behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:35:18 -0000 --smEuXhZLKnMjT4Ht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:32:47PM -0300, mario.lobo@ipad.com.br wrote: > > > > El vie, 07-01-2005 a las 09:06 -0300, mario.lobo@ipad.com.br escribi= =F3: > > > > > > Hello; > > > > > > On all installations of FreeBSD I=B4ve ever done in the past, > > > > > > netstat -an > > > > > > displays LISTENing servers and any tcp connection in any state. > > > > > > On the 5.3 I have installed here ( updated to RELENG_5_3 + build/= installworld ), this command only > > > shows only this; > > > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > > Active Internet connections (including servers) > > > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address = (state) > > > udp4 0 0 *.514 *.* > > > Active UNIX domain sockets > > > Address Type Recv-Q Send-Q Inode Conn Refs Nextref= Addr > > > c38d01a4 stream 0 0 c3de8738 0 0 0= /db/mysql/mysql.sock > > > c38d1000 stream 0 0 c3883c60 0 0 0= /var/run/devd.pipe > > > c38d0ec4 dgram 0 0 c3883210 0 0 0= /var/run/log > > > -------------------------------------------- > > > > > > I have ssh, sendmail, ftpd and mysql daemons running, LISTENing a= nd WORKING. > > > > > > Would anybody know why they are not showing on the output of nets= tat? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > On 7 Jan 2005 at 10:56, Jose Hidalgo Herrera wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > > What about > > netstat -anf inet > > > > Tried that before posting. this is what I get >=20 > Active Internet connections (including servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) > udp4 0 0 *.514 *.* >=20 Try sockstat(1), take a look at the manpage, too. Nathan --smEuXhZLKnMjT4Ht Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB3uRwO0ZIEthSfkkRAl+xAJ4iTH8yesdHBa4/yhazhVftQl/eDwCfZr7X fc4LMX3gKBbKzLnBWdwdlx8= =QPli -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --smEuXhZLKnMjT4Ht-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:44:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3EF16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:44:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.shs.siemens.com (mail.shs.siemens.com [64.46.248.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7336143D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:44:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joseph.Warner@siemens.com) Received: from mlvv9m1x.shs.siemens.com (unknown [165.226.204.11]) by mail.shs.siemens.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7127D38D5E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:44:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from MLVV9MBA.ww005.siemens.net (mlvv9mba.smshsc.net [165.226.204.44])j07JifRu002159 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:44:41 -0500 Received: from MLVV099a.ww005.siemens.net ([165.226.248.184]) by 165.226.204.44 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:41:28 -0500 Received: by mlvv099a.ww005.siemens.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:44:40 -0500 Message-ID: From: Warner Joseph To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:44:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: linux_base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:44:59 -0000 Hi, I'm running 4.8-RELEASE-p27 and had a question regarding my current install of linux_base #portupgrade -l "<" doesn't reveal this package needs upgrading but portaudit -a says: Affected package: linux_base-6.1_6 Type of problem: xpm -- image decoding vulnerabilities. Reference: I've followed that url, googled and searched the -questions archive but can't find any information regarding how to correct this. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks -Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message and any included attachments are from Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee(s). The information contained herein may include trade secrets or privileged or otherwise confidential information. Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe you are not authorized to receive it, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender by e-mail with a copy to Central.SecurityOffice@shs.siemens.com Thank you From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:45:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B05F16A59B for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:45:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3733243D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E0A6C512B5; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:46:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:46:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Martin Gonzalez Message-ID: <20050107194601.GA80494@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <001201c4c4f8$cc6a7980$400cdfdf@orion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001201c4c4f8$cc6a7980$400cdfdf@orion> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: About ports dist X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:45:14 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 12:36:59PM -0600, Martin Gonzalez wrote: > Hi.. >=20 > I have 2 very quick questions/comment about installation from the FreeBSD= CDs, and X-window: >=20 > When I try to install the X.org distribution, it sends an error > message that says it cannot find the packages/INDEX on the specified > media. I checked on the CD 2, and there it is, the full ports > collection, but the index file is named INDEX-5 instead of INDEX, so > I think it might be the problem. Looks like you're trying to install packages, not ports. You forgot to mention which ISO image you used (some don't have packages, and there are only a handful of packages on the disc 1 image). You also forgot to mention which version of FreeBSD you're using. Kris P.S. Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so your emails may be easily r= ead. --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3ub5Wry0BWjoQKURAuWTAJ0dF8x98zyFCcgSKFakIQHtYRksSACgsQKY YNpL5uy35OXyMVzjLdtcjqY= =2LBr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:48:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981DE16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:48:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE1C43D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:48:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 66177512B5; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:49:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:49:27 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: alexei kozlov Message-ID: <20050107194927.GB80494@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41DD8A3F.1040004@nordlines.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DD8A3F.1040004@nordlines.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question re: GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:48:39 -0000 --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:58:07PM +0300, alexei kozlov wrote: > Hello, Gurus. >=20 > My fellow asked me if GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 supports 64bit memory=20 > pointers. He means is it possible to allocate *very* big (4GB and more)= =20 > chunks of storage? This is a function of the FreeBSD kernel, not of the C compiler. The answer is 'yes'. Kris --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3ufHWry0BWjoQKURAtkUAKDpNNHf6WPemCnnboZdydeWioZ0WwCfZu58 DQASajRGRIRI1oAr2a3W8L0= =CKq2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QKdGvSO+nmPlgiQ/-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:49:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695A316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:49:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED66943D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:49:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F3C8E512B5; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:50:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:50:11 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050107195011.GC80494@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <001201c4c4f8$cc6a7980$400cdfdf@orion> <20050107194601.GA80494@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050107194601.GA80494@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Martin Gonzalez cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: About ports dist X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:49:25 -0000 --IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:46:01AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 12:36:59PM -0600, Martin Gonzalez wrote: > > Hi.. > >=20 > > I have 2 very quick questions/comment about installation from the FreeB= SD CDs, and X-window: > >=20 >=20 > > When I try to install the X.org distribution, it sends an error > > message that says it cannot find the packages/INDEX on the specified > > media. I checked on the CD 2, and there it is, the full ports > > collection, but the index file is named INDEX-5 instead of INDEX, so > > I think it might be the problem. >=20 > Looks like you're trying to install packages, not ports. You forgot > to mention which ISO image you used (some don't have packages, and > there are only a handful of packages on the disc 1 image). You also > forgot to mention which version of FreeBSD you're using. >=20 > Kris >=20 > P.S. Please wrap your lines at 70 characters so your emails may be easily= read. P.P.S. Your clock is wrong. --IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3ufzWry0BWjoQKURAhcBAJ44ScDNgDrNVHehcds96Fc47Fb0MACcCaJ4 RDcyZohdNAT1lDilSISdeAQ= =jkcc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IpbVkmxF4tDyP/Kb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:49:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5C916A4CF; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:49:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from recife.ipadnet.com.br (recife.ipadnet.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEF143D39; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:49:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from marioLobo ([200.249.204.142]) by recife.ipadnet.com.br (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j07JuHwT001671; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:56:18 -0300 From: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br Organization: IPAD To: Giorgos Keramidas Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:53:56 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41DEBEA4.30540.1C8DBFC@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20050107192656.GA965@gothmog.gr> References: <41DEAB9F.22561.17E9113@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netstat odd behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:49:55 -0000 That=B4s it !! I=B4ve been having trouble with a sk0 gigabit ethernet and updated the ker= nel to 5_CURRENT to update it with jumbo frame support, But userland was updated to RELENG_= 5_3 only !! I knew about that but the system ran smooth after compiling the new kernel= , I did not think it would make a difference. My mistake. Thanks for pointing it out, Giorgos. -- //| //|| // | // || -//--//---|| ARIO LOBO // // || --------------------------------- mario.lobo@ipad.com.br http://www.ipad.com.br On 7 Jan 2005 at 21:26, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Are you sure you don't have a kernel and userland that are out of > sync? You _did_ update both as the instructions in src/UPDATING > suggest, right? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.= org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:52:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1120716A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:52:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADBF43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BCA9F512B5; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:52:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:52:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Warner Joseph Message-ID: <20050107195256.GD80494@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="osDK9TLjxFScVI/L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: linux_base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:52:09 -0000 --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:44:39PM -0500, Warner Joseph wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I'm running 4.8-RELEASE-p27 and had a question > regarding my current install of linux_base >=20 > #portupgrade -l "<" doesn't reveal this package needs upgrading > but portaudit -a says: >=20 > Affected package: linux_base-6.1_6 > Type of problem: xpm -- image decoding vulnerabilities. > Reference: > .html> >=20 > I've followed that url, googled and searched the -questions archive > but can't find any information regarding how to correct this. >=20 > Can anyone point me in the right direction? linux_base-6 will never have the security vulnerability fixed because it's not supported by redhat. linux_base contains redhat 8.x which is also out of support, but does not currently have security problems. It will be updated to something more modern after 4.11-RELEASE. Kris --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3uiYWry0BWjoQKURAnOjAJ0Y4AAHJ3nuUSs2oV4XxJE8osuVDQCg/jmL oUTtMc+lntKluc/ndNR6ets= =SbPY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --osDK9TLjxFScVI/L-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:56:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706C716A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:56:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D1BB43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:56:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE4969A42; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:56:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:56:00 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Sergey Zaharchenko Message-Id: <20050107145600.5cc307a3.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20050105063822.GA1933@shark.localdomain> References: <20050104100639.6f01c87a.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20050105063822.GA1933@shark.localdomain> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0rc (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Someone trying to break in. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:56:04 -0000 Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:06:39AM -0500, > Bill Moran probably wrote: > > > > Over the holiday I replaced a server that appeared to have been cracked. > > Basically built a replacement with the same services in a sandbox, then > > swapped it with the old one. > > > > The new server seems to be secure, as we're not seeing the spam coming > > off it that the old one was generating, however, I'm seeing a lot of > > messages in the log files. For example: > > > > Jan 4 07:15:13 mail su: _secure_path: cannot stat /usr/sbin/nologin/.login_conf: Not a directory > > It looks like `/usr/sbin/nologin/' is someone's ``home directory'' and > that someone is trying to su. /usr/sbin/nologin can't be a home > directory, it must be the shell for some user who isn't supposed to log > in. /nonexistent should be the home directory. It looks possible that > your password file specifies /usr/sbin/nologin as a home directory and a > valid shell for some system user. Maybe you omitted or added an extra > `:'? Just a guess, Thanks for the input, Sergey. That's certainly what's happening. For some reason, certain user records are awry. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:58:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B707816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:58:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289AD43D4C for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:58:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [10.10.100.90] (unknown[216.113.237.29]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005010719582411200mhns1e> (Authid: duanewinner); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:58:24 +0000 Message-ID: <41DEE9DE.4060408@att.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:58:22 -0500 From: Duane Winner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gustaaf wijnands , FreeBSD mailinglist References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> <41DEAD57.2070706@scii.nl> <41DEAF96.9060400@scii.nl> <41DEC203.4010409@att.net> <41DED53F.3030201@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <41DED53F.3030201@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:58:25 -0000 gustaaf wijnands wrote: >> Just a couple more questions: >> If I keep my ports tree cvsup'd every day, I'm going to have: >> openoffice-1.1.3 < needs updating (port has 1.1.3_1) >> >> We generally do a "portupgrade -a" to upgrade ports unless >> /usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice >> discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again and >> end up failing? >> > > portupgrade -a -x openoffice-1.1.3 ?? > I must be losing it. I looked at the man page twice and didn't see that -x switch. Must be Friday or something. Thanks -- that does it. -DW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 19:58:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291C616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:58:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A0843D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:58:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so99371wri for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:58:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=SQ+xEcJT905ssfQChZYqm6G/4XWXIxc4K1aD3QSv7DyuxMI6DEw7ur8ekBlUuQYRaR+By8J8/5bGBMjAODg7O0wYJ6TzJ38NKzLwGyQv9+gINm9xxAzGAP69gFvRQ3UfUI9yQr3E3GrWJME8zNTTNPlBvUWa9MB+6+BgKtfARe8= Received: by 10.54.57.35 with SMTP id f35mr179481wra; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:58:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:58:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:58:46 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107124651.01f4f528@mail.face2interface.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107124651.01f4f528@mail.face2interface.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make sudo failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:58:50 -0000 On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:48:42 -0500, Marty Landman > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > # make build && make install && rehash && which sudo > /usr/sbin/sysctl: not found > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 797: warning: "/usr/sbin/sysctl -n > kern.osreldate" returned non-zero status > >> sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > >> Attempting to fetch from http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/. > fetch: http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: Not Found > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/. > fetch: ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: File > unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.stikman.com/pub/sudo/. > Receiving sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz (333074 bytes): 100% (ETA 00:00) > 333074 bytes transferred in 112.4 seconds (2.89 kBps) > ===> Extracting for sudo-1.6.6_1 > md5: not found > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Marty, did you move /sbin back to its original place in the file tree? -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:00:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBB516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:00:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B10C43D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:00:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [10.10.100.90] (unknown[216.113.237.29]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005010720000111200mhk28e> (Authid: duanewinner); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:00:01 +0000 Message-ID: <41DEEA40.90507@att.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:00:00 -0500 From: Duane Winner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nbco@screaming.net References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> <41DEC203.4010409@att.net> <41DECD31.7020107@scii.nl> <200501071934.19722.nbco@screaming.net> In-Reply-To: <200501071934.19722.nbco@screaming.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:00:02 -0000 nbco wrote: >On Friday 07 January 2005 17:56, albi wrote: > > >>Duane Winner wrote: >> >> >>>We generally do a "portupgrade -a" to upgrade ports unless >>>/usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice >>>discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again >>>and end up failing?> >>> >>> >>a dirty solution is to press ctrl-c when OOo tries to build, i know >>from experience that portupgrade simply continues with the rest >>without any complaints :) >> >> > >Alterntively, set openoffice to be held in pkgtools.conf >in /usr/local/etc. I have added the following line: > >HOLD_PKGS = ['openoffice-*'] > >This entry will prevent portupgrade attempting to upgrade the port. > > Ooohh...I think I like this better than the '-x' switch. I'll have to give it a wirl. Thanks, DW >If you are using portmanager see this thread to see how to avoid >portmanager attempting to upgrade a held port: >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2005-January/070055.html > >Hope this helps >.nbco > > > > >>Portupgrade honours this setting. >> >>but i assume in the Makefile (in the OOo-portsdir) one can put an >>IGNORE somewhere >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:02:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35ACC16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:02:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEDE43D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:02:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so99723wri for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=guVy2Fo7/GLLhUKJJVY65engrrxR8/wyUzF47iv6Sd/psxYOZPWeKPbgQg/EoUDYtO4iEPiw+89sjwOMFsjwSA/lKparZK3AoYi7y0/egcIcINQZ3lXcTD9Lw1Gpa6eLpSLdPzjgaFK7f25JRQqf1T8A9BTRWWKcNMm1uIvNJuk= Received: by 10.54.2.66 with SMTP id 66mr139182wrb; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:02:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:02:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:02:18 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Duane Winner In-Reply-To: <41DEE9DE.4060408@att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> <41DEAD57.2070706@scii.nl> <41DEAF96.9060400@scii.nl> <41DEC203.4010409@att.net> <41DED53F.3030201@xs4all.nl> <41DEE9DE.4060408@att.net> cc: FreeBSD mailinglist Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:02:23 -0000 On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:58:22 -0500, Duane Winner wrote: > > > gustaaf wijnands wrote: > > >> Just a couple more questions: > >> If I keep my ports tree cvsup'd every day, I'm going to have: > >> openoffice-1.1.3 < needs updating (port has 1.1.3_1) > >> > >> We generally do a "portupgrade -a" to upgrade ports unless > >> /usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice > >> discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again and > >> end up failing? > >> > > > > portupgrade -a -x openoffice-1.1.3 ?? > > > > I must be losing it. I looked at the man page twice and didn't see that > -x switch. Must be Friday or something. > Thanks -- that does it. > > -DW However, please note the response that mentions using HOLD_PKG in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf; that'll save you from having to use -x at all. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:04:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0848616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:04:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BAA43D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:04:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (acksdjm@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j07K4cFf023518; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:04:39 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107150340.036cd570@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:04:51 -0500 To: Joshua Lokken From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107124651.01f4f528@mail.face2interface.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make sudo failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:04:57 -0000 At 02:58 PM 1/7/2005, Joshua Lokken wrote: >On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:48:42 -0500, Marty Landman > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > # make build && make install && rehash && which sudo > > /usr/sbin/sysctl: not found > > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 797: warning: "/usr/sbin/sysctl -n > > kern.osreldate" returned non-zero status > > >> sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > > >> Attempting to fetch from http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/. > > fetch: http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: Not Found > > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/. > > fetch: ftp://ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/sysadmin/sudo/sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz: File > > unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.stikman.com/pub/sudo/. > > Receiving sudo-1.6.6.tar.gz (333074 bytes): 100% (ETA 00:00) > > 333074 bytes transferred in 112.4 seconds (2.89 kBps) > > ===> Extracting for sudo-1.6.6_1 > > md5: not found > > *** Error code 127 > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >Marty, did you move /sbin back to its original place in the >file tree? Sure did. # ls -l / total 10863 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 802 Apr 3 2003 .cshrc -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 251 Apr 3 2003 .profile -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4735 Apr 3 2003 COPYRIGHT drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Feb 9 2004 bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 boot drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 cdrom lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10 Feb 9 2004 compat -> usr/compat drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 17920 Feb 16 2004 dev drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 dist drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 2048 Jun 16 2004 etc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 9 Feb 9 2004 home -> /usr/home -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2736474 Feb 18 2004 kernel -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 2003 kernel.GENERIC -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4122347 Apr 3 2003 kernel.old drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Feb 9 2004 mnt drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 4096 Feb 18 2004 modules drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 4096 Feb 18 2004 modules.old dr-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 512 Jan 7 14:59 proc lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 9 Jan 7 12:31 root -> /usr/root drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 4608 Jan 7 09:11 sbin drwxr-xr-x 5 root wheel 1024 Feb 9 2004 stand lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12 Feb 18 2004 sys -> /usr/src/sys drwxrwxrwt 9 root wheel 1024 Jan 7 14:53 tmp drwxr-xr-x 18 root wheel 512 Jan 7 12:30 usr drwxr-xr-x 21 root wheel 512 Mar 1 2004 var Not root though. Maybe I should put that back too and see if I can build again. Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:14:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7250116A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:14:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.shs.siemens.com (mail.shs.siemens.com [64.46.248.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E421843D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:14:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Joseph.Warner@siemens.com) Received: from mlvv9m1x.shs.siemens.com (unknown [165.226.204.11]) by mail.shs.siemens.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E6439B0E for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:04:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from MLVV9MBA.ww005.siemens.net (mlvv9mba.smshsc.net [165.226.204.44])j07K46AO011415 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:04:06 -0500 Received: from MLVV099a.ww005.siemens.net ([165.226.248.184]) by 165.226.204.44 with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:00:51 -0500 Received: by mlvv099a.ww005.siemens.net with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:04:03 -0500 Message-ID: From: Warner Joseph To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:03:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: linux_base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:14:43 -0000 Thanks Kris, unless I've misunderstood...am I at risk by using linux_base-6 and if so how can I correct this? #portupgrade -rR linux_base doesn't do anything and because of hardware limitations I can't upgrade to a major release. -Joe #-----Original Message----- #From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@obsecurity.org] #Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:53 PM #To: Warner Joseph #Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' #Subject: Re: linux_base # # #On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:44:39PM -0500, Warner Joseph wrote: #> #> Hi, #> #> I'm running 4.8-RELEASE-p27 and had a question #> regarding my current install of linux_base #> #> #portupgrade -l "<" doesn't reveal this package needs upgrading #> but portaudit -a says: #> #> Affected package: linux_base-6.1_6 #> Type of problem: xpm -- image decoding vulnerabilities. #> Reference: #> # .html> #> #> I've followed that url, googled and searched the -questions archive #> but can't find any information regarding how to correct this. #> #> Can anyone point me in the right direction? # #linux_base-6 will never have the security vulnerability fixed because #it's not supported by redhat. linux_base contains redhat 8.x which is #also out of support, but does not currently have security problems. #It will be updated to something more modern after 4.11-RELEASE. # #Kris # # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message and any included attachments are from Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee(s). The information contained herein may include trade secrets or privileged or otherwise confidential information. Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe you are not authorized to receive it, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender by e-mail with a copy to Central.SecurityOffice@shs.siemens.com Thank you From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:20:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F026A16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:20:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAFC543D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:20:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from pd5mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.144]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9Y000MZR6JIX60@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:20:43 -0700 (MST) Received: from pn2ml9so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.7]) by pd5mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9Y00BEPR6JHW80@pd5mr3so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:20:43 -0700 (MST) Received: from procyon.nekulturny.org (S0106000c41b2b9a3.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.45.143]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I9Y00M7FR6J0Z@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:20:43 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:20:42 -0700 From: Danny MacMillan In-reply-to: To: Supote Leelasupphakorn Message-id: <20050107202042.GB865@procyon.nekulturny.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Able to mount samba but it's empty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:20:44 -0000 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:44:02PM +0700, Supote Leelasupphakorn wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm using 4.8-RELEASE-p15 and Samba-2.2.8a for mounting > shared directory on Windows2000 (NTFS). So far the disk on > Windows2000 is only 120 GB and mounting is successful. > > But after I changed a disk to 200GB, I can sucessfully mount > both 120GB and 200GB (I mean no any error message are > displayed) but I can't see any file in the mount point of 200GB > disk. I googled for a while but no any answer useful. Is there > any problem with 200 GB disk on Samba-2.2.8 OR it's time to > upgraded the Samba's version OR I missed something ? Is the disk in the machine running Windows 2000? If so, you will want to ensure that you have enabled Big LBA support on the Windows side, if you haven't already. There's a 137GB barrier in Windows 2k that can cause major data loss, as I learned the hard way. I don't know if it has any impact on Samba, but since the drives are on either side of the barrier it's worth looking into. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/305098/EN-US/ If you haven't enabled this yet, do it. If you don't you will lose data, you will lose data, you will lose data. Even if you haven't lost data yet, you will. It might not make Samba work, but it will make Windows 2000 work. -- Danny P.S. I'm not kidding. If you love your data (and who doesn't), go enable 48 bit LBA. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:24:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C19D16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:24:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0A243D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:24:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E0F55126E; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:25:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:25:38 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Warner Joseph Message-ID: <20050107202538.GA96251@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" cc: 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: linux_base X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:24:50 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 03:03:54PM -0500, Warner Joseph wrote: >=20 > Thanks Kris, unless I've misunderstood...am I at risk > by using linux_base-6 and if so how can I correct this? See the URL you gave me. You have to switch to linux_base-8. See /usr/ports/UPDATING. > #portupgrade -rR linux_base doesn't do anything and > because of hardware limitations I can't upgrade to a major > release. You don't have to do anything to your FreeBSD release. Kris --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3vBBWry0BWjoQKURAkoJAJ9bmWVYquL4v2t+THkCdnmmCkYFYwCggfXJ C3QJlni1dFTyjoHHmjrpbP4= =SkGF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:26:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9058D16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:26:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp18.wxs.nl (smtp18.wxs.nl [195.121.6.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFF443D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:26:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from ZGISH (ip3e833f72.speed.planet.nl [62.131.63.114]) by smtp18.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I9Y00BJRRG4LF@smtp18.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:26:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:26:31 +0100 From: Kiffin Gish To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <005401c4f4f7$2c8bb7b0$9900000a@ZGISH> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_WDfu6gjDCqB037aqBewmvw)" Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 00000000DA18B7C9E0C09641B844D919507EA016449A3D00 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:26:30 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_WDfu6gjDCqB037aqBewmvw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Does anyone know when Firebird 1.0 will be available as an official port? I still seem to only be able to build an older 0.9x version. -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands --Boundary_(ID_WDfu6gjDCqB037aqBewmvw)-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:29:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C845816A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:29:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7645A43D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:29:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B23E956437; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:29:39 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:29:39 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Kiffin Gish Message-ID: <20050107202939.GB702@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <005401c4f4f7$2c8bb7b0$9900000a@ZGISH> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005401c4f4f7$2c8bb7b0$9900000a@ZGISH> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: your mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:29:41 -0000 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:26:31PM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote: > Does anyone know when Firebird 1.0 will be available as an official port? I > still seem to only be able to build an older 0.9x version. Are you talking about www/firefox? It's been a 1.0 for ages. Have you updated your ports collection? Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Opportunity does not knock, it presents itself when you beat down the door" - W.E. Channing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:37:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A0A16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:37:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8563043D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@worldnet.att.net) Received: from [10.10.100.90] (unknown[216.113.237.29]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005010720372011100j80rue> (Authid: duanewinner); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:37:20 +0000 Message-ID: <41DEF2FE.5060406@att.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:37:18 -0500 From: Duane Winner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050104) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD mailinglist References: <41DEAAFA.1050504@att.net> <41DEAD57.2070706@scii.nl> <41DEAF96.9060400@scii.nl> <41DEC203.4010409@att.net> <41DED53F.3030201@xs4all.nl> <41DEE9DE.4060408@att.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: openoffice on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:37:20 -0000 Joshua Lokken wrote: >On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:58:22 -0500, Duane Winner wrote: > > >>gustaaf wijnands wrote: >> >> >> >>>>Just a couple more questions: >>>>If I keep my ports tree cvsup'd every day, I'm going to have: >>>>openoffice-1.1.3 < needs updating (port has 1.1.3_1) >>>> >>>>We generally do a "portupgrade -a" to upgrade ports unless >>>>/usr/ports/UPDATING affects us. How can I get around the openoffice >>>>discrepency since a portupgrade -a will always try build it again and >>>>end up failing? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>portupgrade -a -x openoffice-1.1.3 ?? >>> >>> >>> >>I must be losing it. I looked at the man page twice and didn't see that >>-x switch. Must be Friday or something. >>Thanks -- that does it. >> >>-DW >> >> > >However, please note the response that mentions using >HOLD_PKG in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf; that'll save >you from having to use -x at all. > > > > Oh yeah, this *is* definately better. Just tried it. The first reason being is that it removes the chance of forgetting the '-x' and walking away, but I was also delighted with this output: ---> Skipping 'editors/openoffice-1.1' because it is held by user (specify -f to force) Which makes it nice to remember it's still there, and when the port gets fixed for 5.3, I'll be reminded to try again at some point. Cheers, DW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 20:57:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFE916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:57:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B015043D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:57:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.13.2/8.13.2/d) with ESMTP id j07KvjPD000827; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:57:45 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:57:45 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200501072057.j07Kvjc7000826@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, joshua.lokken@gmail.com Subject: Re: burning 5.3-RELEASE CDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:57:52 -0000 On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:36:30 -0600 Joshua Lokken wrote: >On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:31:37 -0600 (CST), Scott Bennett > wrote: >> On Thu Jan 6 09:58:55 2005 Jerry McAllister >> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 18:55:10 -0700 Danny MacMillan >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:35:43PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:37:41 -0700 Danny MacMillan >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >This is not intuitive, but you do not want to use the "make a >> >> >> >bootable CD" function of Sonic RecordNow! to make a bootable CD. >> >> >> >> >> >> On what basis is the above statement made if you haven't used >> >> >> Sonic RecordNow! ? It certainly looks to me as though the green >> >> >> button is the *only* way to burn an image (not counting making an >> >> >> exact copy of >> >> > >> >> >On the basis of your characterizing the little green button as being >> >> >"for making a bootable CD", and my understanding of that function in >> >> >alternative software. In short: I misunderstood. I apologize for >> >> >the misdirection. >> >> > >> >> Oh. That was because, if one places the cursor over the green >> >> button, a box appears temporarily bearing a line that says, "Click >> >> here to make this CD/DVD bootable". And, as noted in a different >> >> posting in this thread, that button brings up a browser panel for >> >> choosing an image file (but not displaying .iso files among the >> >> choices) to burn in making the bootable disk. >> > >> >Just an additional note for clarity: If I understand - and I don't >> >have the rest of the thread so I may be missing something - you want >> >to make a bootable CD of one of the ISO images. >> > >> >In that case, you do NOT want to use any of the options on your local >> >machine to create a bootable CD because the ISO image is already a >> >bootable image. It needs merely to be written raw to the media. >> > >> >When your utility asks if you want to create a bootable CD, it is >> >asking if you want it to add a boot record for it and the other pointers >> >to the file to make it bootable. Since the FreeeBSD ISO already has >> >that stuff in it, you don't want it done again. So, choose the options >> >that just write the data image directly to the CD with no additions. >> > >> No, no. This is wrong. You missed the explanation I posted regarding >> Sonic RecordNow!, as well as an earlier one by Robin Becker. The green >> button is the only way to tell the application that the file(s) it is to >> burn is/are image file(s), and it doesn't know that .iso files are a type >> of image file, so it doesn't list them in its browser unless you tell it >> to display *all* files in the chosen directory. > >Obviously, this Sonic RecordNow? software isn't working well for you. >Have you considered any of the alternatives that burn isos without >problems; Nero, Alcohol, Fireburner ? > As I already explained here on this list, the key to getting burncd to work right was to copy the image file from the Windows XP partition into a FreeBSD partition to use as input to burncd. That worked fine for CD-RWs, though not as well for CD-Rs. The earlier failure of burncd to produce a bootable CD-R was apparently caused somehow by having burncd read directly from a Windows XP partition mounted onto /mnt. That's it for the re-explanations, folks. Please don't post followups in this thread if you haven't been following it. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 21:06:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB0616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:06:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net (pimout2-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA0843D45 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:06:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@antsclimbtree.com) Received: from lilbuddy.antsclimbtree.com (adsl-66-122-112-171.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [66.122.112.171]) j07L6bXO274434 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:06:37 -0500 Received: from antslaptop.antsclimbtree.com ([192.168.1.192]) by lilbuddy.antsclimbtree.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1Cn1Jm-0007Ip-4V for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:06:48 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <029B5842-60F0-11D9-98A7-000393A5ED5E@antsclimbtree.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: "'questions@freebsd.org'" From: Mark Edwards Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:06:33 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) Subject: Memory issues on 4.10 server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:06:38 -0000 I'm having two weird memory issues that have cropped up on my 4.10 server: 1) Apache runs away and creates tons of processes and eventually takes down the server, eating up tons of processes. I see regular notifications like the following: Jan 6 07:25:09 lilbuddy /kernel: pid 16828 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 6 I've taken to restarting Apache once an hour, which has curtailed the problem for now. But I would love to figure out why this is happening and so far have not been able to find many clues. The only Apache-related thing that has changed in the last several months is adding phpbb to the server. 2) snmpd also has had some freakouts where it eats up more and more swap space until it no longer functions. Restarting snmpd clears the problem. I'm using snmpd in conjunction with MRTG. This phenomenon does not seem to take down the server, surprisingly. It still functions relatively responsively. This doesn't happen regularly and I haven't seen it in a few days so I don't see a pattern yet. It is perhaps related to the Apache problem. Its hard to say, because when Apache freaks out, it starts to take the server down and that affects all sorts of things. Obviously I'm not onto the source of these issues, because my efforts to identify that have so far been in vain. Anyone who can give me some advice would be much appreciated. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 21:40:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3552816A4D0; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:40:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx.hostarica.com (www2.hostarica.com [196.40.45.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B81643D45; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:40:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jose@hostarica.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.hostarica.com [127.0.0.1]) by mx.hostarica.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F28F7EF; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:03:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (jose.hostarica.net [192.168.0.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.hostarica.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB8DF7C6; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:03:17 -0600 (CST) From: Jose Hidalgo Herrera To: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br In-Reply-To: <41DE5113.24978.1CDD38@localhost> References: <41DE5113.24978.1CDD38@localhost> Organization: Corp. Hostarica Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:56:21 -0600 Message-Id: <1105116981.2870.0.camel@jose.hostarica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: jose@hostarica.com Subject: Re: netstat odd behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jose@hostarica.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:40:23 -0000 What about netstat -anf inet El vie, 07-01-2005 a las 09:06 -0300, mario.lobo@ipad.com.br escribió: > Hello; > > On all installations of FreeBSD I´ve ever done in the past, > > netstat -an > > displays LISTENing servers and any tcp connection in any state. > > On the 5.3 I have installed here ( updated to RELENG_5_3 + build/installworld ), this command only > shows only this; > > -------------------------------------------- > Active Internet connections (including servers) > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) > udp4 0 0 *.514 *.* > Active UNIX domain sockets > Address Type Recv-Q Send-Q Inode Conn Refs Nextref Addr > c38d01a4 stream 0 0 c3de8738 0 0 0 /db/mysql/mysql.sock > c38d1000 stream 0 0 c3883c60 0 0 0 /var/run/devd.pipe > c38d0ec4 dgram 0 0 c3883210 0 0 0 /var/run/log > -------------------------------------------- > > I have ssh, sendmail, ftpd and mysql daemons running, LISTENing and WORKING. > > Would anybody know why they are not showing on the output of netstat? > > Thanks, -- Jose Hidalgo Herrera Corp. Hostarica From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 21:49:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE5916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:49:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D61643D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:49:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sp0ng3b0b@sbcglobal.net) Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.25?) (joe?stevensen@69.107.45.115 with plain) by smtp816.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 21:49:24 -0000 Message-ID: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:49:23 -0800 From: sp0ng3b0b User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:49:25 -0000 Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with 5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers. Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? I ask this only because I don't see a lot of communication to the list about these issues being addressed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 21:52:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6789616A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:52:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20CB43D54 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:52:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF9445092; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:52:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.rulez.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (daemon.rulez.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91414-06; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:52:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from danger.mcrn.sk (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DA44508C; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:52:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:51:41 +0100 From: DanGer X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1406344890.20050107225141@rulez.sk> To: sp0ng3b0b , questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> References: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at daemon.rulez.sk Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: DanGer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:52:39 -0000 Hi sp0ng3b0b, Friday, January 7, 2005, 10:49:23 PM, you typed: > Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with > 5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers. > Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps > going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? next 4.x release - 4.11 will be the last release from 4.x branch > I ask this only because I don't see a lot of communication to the list > about these issues being addressed. -- Best Regards, +----------==/\/\==----------+ (__) FreeBSD | DanGer | \\\'',) The | DanGer@IRCnet ICQ261701668 | \/ \ ^ Power | http://danger.homeunix.org | .\._/_) To +----------==\/\/==----------+ Serve [ A penny earned....is cheap labor. ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 21:54:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8957D16A4CF for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:54:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D61C43D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:54:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j07LsK229417; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:54:20 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200501072154.j07LsK229417@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: sp0ng3b0b@sbcglobal.net (sp0ng3b0b) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:54:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> from "sp0ng3b0b" at Jan 07, 2005 01:49:23 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:54:23 -0000 > > Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with > 5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers. > > Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps > going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? It has been stated that they hope 4.11 will be the last release in the 4.xx track. That is due out at the end of January. I don't think that 4.11 being the last out is hard and fast yet though. I don't see much discussion of stability or security issues with 5.3+ - only some gripes about it being a little slow and some comments that not all the debug code has yet been removed which accounts for a portion of the slowness in some things - network response, I think. > I ask this only because I don't see a lot of communication to the list > about these issues being addressed. It has been discussed a number of times. ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 21:56:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A750416A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:56:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stewie.obfuscated.net (stewie.obfuscated.net [66.118.188.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF3643D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:56:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m@obmail.net) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (653259hfc120.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.59.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by stewie.obfuscated.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8625A6104; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:56:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200501072154.j07LsK229417@clunix.cl.msu.edu> References: <200501072154.j07LsK229417@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: M Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:55:44 -0500 To: Jerry McAllister X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: sp0ng3b0b cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:56:33 -0000 On Jan 7, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Jerry McAllister wrote: > It has been stated that they hope 4.11 will be the last release > in the 4.xx track. That is due out at the end of January. > I don't think that 4.11 being the last out is hard and fast yet though. > If I recall 4.8 or 4.9 was supposed to be the last 4.X release. I wouldn't count on anything until they shoot it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 21:58:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FDF16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:58:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D85F43D1F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so85364wra for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:58:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Upb2zo4hgjh2OcNwMHD+jo7d23q9m/e0TzsSU1EAofjsSZBo/e2S5GdYl8fHr5+IDwpiy7KvmEnnZafsl2SsoipJRqqfpzdJIVmeH9UC6qsR/JgppPDtJRMTGCcmYgLFfosCo+NxsPqHQ/tSWUr6gsVBcxbV+TFOpQyOhMoazuA= Received: by 10.54.2.55 with SMTP id 55mr596531wrb; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:58:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:58:38 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: John In-Reply-To: <20050107104237.B24947@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050107104237.B24947@starfire.mn.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD trashed after installing Win98SE in lower partition - what to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:58:39 -0000 On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:42:37 -0600, John wrote: > My questions have to do with the mess I have left after trying to do > a dual-boot system with Win98SE and FreeBSD 4.9+. > > After running the FreeBSD system for nearly a year, and loving it, > I finally got around to digging up the media I needed to do the > Win98SE install, and my FreeBSD partition is now unbootable. This, > obviously, is very disturbing. You can install the GAG boot manager: http://gag.sourceforge.net/ and then tell it to boot into either Win98SE or FreeBSD. It'll work fine with whatever state your existing MBR is in, within reason. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:01:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1411916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:01:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from quark.cs.earlham.edu (cs.earlham.edu [159.28.230.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E3343D49 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:01:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Received: from [192.168.0.29] (CPE-67-48-232-40.new.rr.com [67.48.232.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by quark.cs.earlham.edu (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j07M1LiW071482 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:01:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from skylar@cs.earlham.edu) Message-ID: <41DF06AB.6030608@cs.earlham.edu> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:01:15 -0600 From: Skylar Thompson Organization: Earlham College Computer Science Department User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DanGer References: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> <1406344890.20050107225141@rulez.sk> In-Reply-To: <1406344890.20050107225141@rulez.sk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1047EE68EA358BA4400BE393" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on quark.cs.earlham.edu X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Earlham-CS-Dept-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: skylar@cs.earlham.edu cc: sp0ng3b0b cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: skylar@cs.earlham.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:01:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1047EE68EA358BA4400BE393 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DanGer wrote: >Hi sp0ng3b0b, > >Friday, January 7, 2005, 10:49:23 PM, you typed: > > > >>Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with >>5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers. >> >> > > > >>Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps >>going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? >> >> > >next 4.x release - 4.11 will be the last release from 4.x branch > Will there still be security patches released for 4.x? Will any patches be backported from 5-RELEASE? -- -- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu) -- http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/ --------------enig1047EE68EA358BA4400BE393 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB3wavsc4yyULgN4YRAiQmAJwLRoyIvnh5SqjSOmCnhtbZU6BbgQCfQ7rj 49TYty0vrkx/jA044HR9eCY= =BQyw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1047EE68EA358BA4400BE393-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:03:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFD616A4CE; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:03:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.wavebandwireless.com (mail.wavebandwireless.com [65.248.172.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A9F43D1D; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:03:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff@solutionsitconsulting.com) Received: from jeff (office.solutionsitconsulting.com [65.248.173.50]) by mail.wavebandwireless.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B67D48E0AB; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:03:18 -0600 (CST) From: "Jeff Tollison" To: , Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:01:16 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcT1BGjKhhaurT4lToqthofHmpteXg== Message-Id: <20050107220318.8B67D48E0AB@mail.wavebandwireless.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Sony autoloader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:03:19 -0000 Hello, I have having difficulties setting up a Sony AIT-1 External Autoloader TSL-SA300C to work with FreeBSD 5.3. When I boot the system, I get this: . . . pci1: at device 7.0 (no driver attached) . . . I have a GENERIC kernel, so I have the "device scbus" and "device ch" installed in the kernel. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeff Tollison Network Specialist Solutions IT Consulting Waveband Wireless Internet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:06:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C5516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:06:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBA543D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:06:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EF7220A68 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:06:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51314-16 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:06:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3114220A20 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:06:18 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:06:17 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107124651.01f4f528@mail.face2interface.com> <41DEDA9C.903@tilde.it> <6.2.0.14.0.20050107133514.037e2810@mail.face2interface.com> In-Reply-To: <6.2.0.14.0.20050107133514.037e2810@mail.face2interface.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1270209.psNQaVquQ7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200501071606.17703.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: make sudo failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:06:20 -0000 --nextPart1270209.psNQaVquQ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 07 January 2005 12:37, Marty Landman wrote: > Matteo, not aware of how to deal with this. Could you please be more > specific? In case this may be related, I'm running 4.8 installed from the > mini-iso and have never updated the ports collection. Am on dial up so it > always seemed too duanting a task. I've updated ports via slow connections many times without too much trouble= =2E =20 The first update may take a while, sure, but keeping it current should be=20 pretty easy. You could even download a tarball of the ports collection to= =20 get started with a reasonably new tree. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1270209.psNQaVquQ7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBB3wfZ5sRg+Y0CpvERApq4AJ9SaXlUsFVZ+PA6jnotPkt9MX8FygCfWLav WyO4asPGU09TIeKkzJM5e5w= =FXb+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1270209.psNQaVquQ7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:06:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DC316A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:06:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C872943D48 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:06:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id j07M6Ucf000305; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:06:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.1.245] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)j07M6NxV016679; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:06:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> References: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <5DF928F0-60F8-11D9-8C9F-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:06:22 -0500 To: sp0ng3b0b X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:06:31 -0000 On Jan 7, 2005, at 4:49 PM, sp0ng3b0b wrote: > Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? > Perhaps going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? FreeBSD is in the middle of releasing 4.11, and has committed to providing extended support for 4.10 through May 31, 2006 and for RELENG_4 (meaning 4.11, or later if need be) through January 31, 2007. > I ask this only because I don't see a lot of communication to the list > about these issues being addressed. http://www.freebsd.org/security/ http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.11R/schedule.html -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:10:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA9916A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:10:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av7-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (av7-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21ED143D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:10:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av7-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 7636C37F48; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:10:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.178]) by av7-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BE337E72 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:10:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp2-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2551D37E47 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:10:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 73658 invoked by uid 1001); 7 Jan 2005 22:10:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:10:45 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: sp0ng3b0b Message-ID: <20050107221045.GA73635@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: sp0ng3b0b , questions@freebsd.org References: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:10:48 -0000 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:49:23PM -0800, sp0ng3b0b wrote: > Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with > 5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers. > > Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps > going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? > > I ask this only because I don't see a lot of communication to the list > about these issues being addressed. As far as I know there are currently no plans for any more 4.x releases beyond the upcoming 4.11. Security fixes will however be applied to 4.x until Jan 2007 (according to http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html) Considering that relatively few changes have been made to 4-STABLE between the release of 4.10 and 4.11 and considering that this rate of change will probably slow down even further as time goes on and most developers move over to 5.x there probably will be too few changes applied to 4.x to warrant a 4.12 release anytime soon. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:22:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A48A16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:22:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m17.mx.aol.com (imo-m17.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94C443D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:22:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-m17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id s.f.3be1e00b (4214); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:22:33 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:22:33 EST To: tedm@toybox.placo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:22:44 -0000 If you nor any of the FreeBSD developers "know" about the 75xx series of chipsets, then I guess that explains why the score is Linux 87, FreeBSD 2. and getting worse by the day. Nicely done. What are you developing on, gaming machines? Why have you trashed the OS to strengthen SMP computing when you don't even know what chipsets are required to run the latest SMP processors? What's really scary is that you'd rather come up with 35 reasons not to do something than to spend 10 minutes trying to find out what you don't know. I posted exactly why 5.x is slower than 4.x, and its not "because its bigger", you blubbering moron. Thats the kind of answer I'd expect from my secretary. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:23:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A7E16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:23:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C92943D46 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:23:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 1Okiy@list.ru) Received: from [80.252.128.106] (port=61226 helo=[192.168.254.47]) by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp id 1Cn2Vr-000F5S-00 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:23:19 +0300 Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:22:59 +0300 From: 1Okiy@list.ru X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.10.03) Personal Organization: home X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <897029378.20050108012259@list.ru> To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam: Not detected Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: 1Okiy@list.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:23:20 -0000 Çäðàâñòâóéòå, questions. Ïîäñêàæèòå.... ÷òî áû ìíå âûéòè â èíåò, ÷åðåç ëîêàëêó ìíå íóæíî ñîçäàòü VPN óêàçàâ IP êîìïüþòåðà ê êîòîðîìó îñóùåñòâëÿåòñÿ ïîäêëþ÷åíèå,ëîãèí, ïàðîëü êàê ýòî ìîæíî ñäåëàòü â FReeBSD -- Ñ óâàæåíèåì, no_name mailto:1Okiy@list.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:28:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C139C16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:28:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E2F43D2D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2DDB15128D; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:29:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:29:20 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Skylar Thompson Message-ID: <20050107222920.GA31668@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> <1406344890.20050107225141@rulez.sk> <41DF06AB.6030608@cs.earlham.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DF06AB.6030608@cs.earlham.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: sp0ng3b0b cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: DanGer Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:28:32 -0000 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:01:15PM -0600, Skylar Thompson wrote: > Will there still be security patches released for 4.x? Will any patches= =20 > be backported from 5-RELEASE? www.freebsd.org/security Kris --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3w1AWry0BWjoQKURArAwAJ9rhOlx/UjyLMqM58Ld5NJ3exLI+QCg8VWR ahbLR/cLlu3Axp/3Cqe+I7g= =8nnr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:28:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5123616A4D5 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:28:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.metawire.org (openwire.metawire.org [66.101.226.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFE843D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:28:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryanv@metawire.org) Received: from laptop.puffy (c-66-176-147-72.se.client2.attbi.com [66.176.147.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.metawire.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94313326B8 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:28:28 -0500 (EST) From: ryanv@metawire.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:23:47 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501071723.47818.ryanv@metawire.org> Subject: dns timeouts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:28:35 -0000 I am new to FREEBSD and trying 5.3 on my compaq presario 2190US laptop. After a fight I got the CD and everything running. Now my dns resolutions keep timing out. I do not see anything on the errata, can someone point me in a direction to do some light reading or to a patch. The problem seems simular to a BIND problem on my openBSD NAT, but I found a source patch in Nov.. $ dig www.freebsd.org ; <<>> DiG 9.3.0 <<>> www.freebsd.org ;; global options: printcmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached $ dig www.freebsd.org ; <<>> DiG 9.3.0 <<>> www.freebsd.org ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 49881 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 5, ADDITIONAL: 5 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.freebsd.org. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.freebsd.org. 3123 IN A 216.136.204.117 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: freebsd.org. 3123 IN NS ns0.freebsd.org. freebsd.org. 3123 IN NS ns1.iafrica.com. freebsd.org. 3123 IN NS ns1.downloadtech.com. freebsd.org. 3123 IN NS ns2.downloadtech.com. freebsd.org. 3123 IN NS ns2.iafrica.com. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ns0.freebsd.org. 142949 IN A 216.136.204.126 ns1.iafrica.com. 114188 IN A 196.7.0.139 ns1.downloadtech.com. 134511 IN A 209.237.247.3 ns2.downloadtech.com. 134511 IN A 209.237.247.2 ns2.iafrica.com. 163 IN A 196.7.142.133 ;; Query time: 198 msec ;; SERVER: 68.87.96.4#53(68.87.96.4) ;; WHEN: Fri Jan 7 16:58:41 2005 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 243 $ ifconfig -a sis0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 inet6 fe80::20d:9dff:fe84:da86%sis0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 ether 00:0d:9d:84:da:86 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 $ cat resolv.conf domain puffy nameserver 68.87.96.4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:32:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00F016A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:32:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com (imo-d05.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461A943D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:32:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Tm4528@aol.com) Received: from Tm4528@aol.com by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id j.59.1e854c16 (4214); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:31:49 -0500 (EST) From: Tm4528@aol.com Message-ID: <59.1e854c16.2f1067d4@aol.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:31:48 EST To: sp0ng3b0b@sbcglobal.net, questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5116 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:32:02 -0000 In a message dated 1/7/05 4:50:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, sp0ng3b0b@sbcglobal.net writes: >Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with >5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers. > >Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps >going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? > >I ask this only because I don't see a lot of communication to the list about these issues being addressed. Just note that they "say" its supported, but if you want to use the latest Intel CPUs (800Mhz FSB Xeon64), they don't work in 4.x. Sadly noone in the FreeBSD universe is even familiar (it seems) with new server MBs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:36:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1181E16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:36:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C935043D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:36:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0903.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 4E6941C001D5 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:36:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0903.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 352401C001D1 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:36:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:36:02 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <343219484.20050107233602@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Is there a problem with syslogd -a? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:36:05 -0000 Is there any kind of problem with syslogd and the -a option? I've tried all sorts of variations (-a 10.0.0.x, -a 10.0.0.x/24, -a myrouter.mydomain, -a myrouter.mydomain/24, etc.) and it just doesn't seem to let anything through. Starting syslogd without any option works (my router can write to the system log--both are on my internal LAN); starting it with the -a option for a little more security prevents anything at all from being written. Am I doing something wrong, or is there a bug? I don't necessarily need the extra security (no syslog UDP traffic can enter the LAN from the outside, anyway), but it would be nice if I could get this option to work. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:49:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8794E16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:49:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from viefep17-int.chello.at (viefep17-int.chello.at [213.46.255.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F6B43D39 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:49:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@freemail.hu) Received: from hyperduron ([80.99.33.169]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.03.05 201-2131-111-107-20040910) with ESMTP id <20050107224932.FDEQ26106.viefep17-int.chello.at@hyperduron> for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:49:32 +0100 From: "=?iso-8859-2?B?S/Z2ZXNk4W4gR+Fib3I=?=" To: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:49:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcT1CzAXO8XXYQ76SnehDqEA+fcIZg== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-Id: <20050107224932.FDEQ26106.viefep17-int.chello.at@hyperduron> Subject: Booting problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gabor.kovesdan@freemail.hu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:49:35 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:55:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F020116A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:55:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay15-f14.bay15.hotmail.com [65.54.185.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D959C43D2F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:55:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdagee@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:55:00 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 68.185.36.149 by by15fd.bay15.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:54:28 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.185.36.149] X-Originating-Email: [kdagee@hotmail.com] X-Sender: kdagee@hotmail.com From: "Karl Agee" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 14:54:28 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2005 22:55:00.0467 (UTC) FILETIME=[EAB93C30:01C4F50B] Subject: Device Perms in 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:55:01 -0000 I want to use 5.3 as a desktop system, but I am having some problems with device permissions. Since devfs re-creates devices on boot I have to redo the perms everytime I want to use these devices. Listening to audio cd's, watching dvd's or burning cd's/dvd's. Gets a little annoying. How can I "peg" device permissions the way I want them...other than using it on a daily basis as root? --Karl _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:58:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA3D16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:58:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8369343D3F for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:58:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 600FF5128D; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:58:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:58:50 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Karl Agee Message-ID: <20050107225850.GA32279@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Device Perms in 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:58:01 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:54:28PM -0800, Karl Agee wrote: > I want to use 5.3 as a desktop system, but I am having some problems with= =20 > device permissions. Since devfs re-creates devices on boot I have to red= o=20 > the perms everytime I want to use these devices. Listening to audio cd's= ,=20 > watching dvd's or burning cd's/dvd's. Gets a little annoying. >=20 > How can I "peg" device permissions the way I want them...other than using= =20 > it on a daily basis as root? man devfs Kris --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3xQpWry0BWjoQKURAl5QAJ0RKo8ro86M6abpiP7GiXzq8T5KuwCcCX3N FoX1/KDs+4uiv/JpqbOvY20= =6Zts -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 22:58:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE6516A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:58:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from viefep11-int.chello.at (viefep11-int.chello.at [213.46.255.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E3843D1D for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:58:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@freemail.hu) Received: from hyperduron ([80.99.33.169]) by viefep11-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20050107225820.LRRT20013.viefep11-int.chello.at@hyperduron> for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:58:20 +0100 From: "=?iso-8859-2?B?S/Z2ZXNk4W4gR+Fib3I=?=" To: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:58:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcT1DGrrvOgtRO9SRFyLnUe0LTK5jA== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-Id: <20050107225820.LRRT20013.viefep11-int.chello.at@hyperduron> Subject: Booting problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gabor.kovesdan@freemail.hu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 22:58:23 -0000 Hi, I have an amd64 server machine with a 3ware 8506-4lp raid controller and succeeded in installing the FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE on this machine in safe mode, but it boots only in safe mode. I've upgraded the kernel to = stable, but there's no result. I don't know what's the difference between the safe mode and the normal mode, in fact. Anyway, I'd like to play around with the setings, and = when there isn't a better solution, then I'd rather change the default boot method to safe mode. Please give me some advices, otherwise I'll get out of the time. The = next week is the deadline, the server should work until then. Best regards, G=E1bor K=F6vesd=E1n From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 7 23:06:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE4D16A4CE for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:06:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lp1001.snu.ac.kr (lp1001.snu.ac.kr [147.46.70.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81E643D31 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:06:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by lp1001.snu.ac.kr (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j07N4EJT010563 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:04:15 +0900 Message-ID: <41DF15F8.1070900@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:06:32 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <343219484.20050107233602@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <343219484.20050107233602@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Is there a problem with syslogd -a? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:06:39 -0000 Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Is there any kind of problem with syslogd and the -a option? I've tried > all sorts of variations (-a 10.0.0.x, -a 10.0.0.x/24, -a On 5.3, I have following in rc.conf: syslogd_flags="-a 192.168.123.0/24 -b 192.168.123.254" on the machine that has IP 192.168.123.254. It serves a cluster of 192.168.123.X with X = 1 to 7 /etc/syslog.conf on the 192.168.123.X PCs has: *.* @192.168.123.254 and all syslog messages arrive on 192.168.123.254 and are stored there. Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 00:00:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5704216A4D0; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:00:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BF243D45; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:00:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) id j0800ftn010295; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:00:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:00:41 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Jeff Tollison Message-ID: <20050108000041.GA99385@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050107220318.8B67D48E0AB@mail.wavebandwireless.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050107220318.8B67D48E0AB@mail.wavebandwireless.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sony autoloader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 00:00:45 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 07), Jeff Tollison said: > I have having difficulties setting up a Sony AIT-1 External > Autoloader TSL-SA300C to work with FreeBSD 5.3. When I boot the > system, I get this: > > pci1: at device 7.0 (no driver attached) > > I have a GENERIC kernel, so I have the "device scbus" and "device ch" > installed in the kernel. Looks like you're missing the driver for your server's SCSI card. GENERIC should have all the SCSI drivers built in, though. Maybe it's a supported card using a new PCI ID. What does "pciconf -lv" say for that slot? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 00:32:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA60916A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:32:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A791943D45 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:32:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from [10.20.30.249] (adsl-66-125-125-68.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [66.125.125.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j080WSvA048061 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:32:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:32:31 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Subject: Getting USB2 on FreeBSD 5.3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 00:32:36 -0000 Greetings again. I have a no-name USB 2 controller card in my server running FreeBSD 5.3. I rebuilt the kernel with the ehci driver (simply by adding a line to copy of GENERIC and rebuilding). The box already has two USB 1 ports. The dmesg says: . . . ohci0: mem 0xfe123000-0xfe123fff irq 18 at device 3.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0 usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xfe122000-0xfe122fff irq 19 at device 3.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0 usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: NEC OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfe124000-0xfe1240ff irq 18 at device 3.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci_pci_attach: companion usb0 ehci_pci_attach: companion usb1 usb2: EHCI version 0.95 usb2: companion controllers, 3 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: NEC EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 5 ports with 5 removable, self powered . . . ohci2: mem 0xfe120000-0xfe120fff irq 3 at device 15.2 on pci0 ohci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb3: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb3: SMM does not respond, resetting usb3: on ohci2 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered When I plug in a USB 2 IDE adapter to the USB 2 card, I see: umass0: Myson Century, Inc. USB Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/a3.01, addr 2 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 1.000MB/s transfers da0: 114473MB (234441648 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 14593C) The transfers happen at USB 1, not USB 2 speeds, which is of course not what I want. I can't tell why da0 is getting the slow (USB 1) mode. I also can't figure out what the heck ohci2 is; there is only the on-board USB 1 ports (which I assume are ohci0 and ohci1) and the card (which is clearly ehci0). Is ohci2 possibly also running on the add-in card and stomping on ehci0? I guess a related question is how can I tell what device umass0 thinks it is plugged into? --Paul Hoffman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 00:47:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2789C16A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:47:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.wavebandwireless.com (mail.wavebandwireless.com [65.248.172.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC10B43D46; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:47:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeff@solutionsitconsulting.com) Received: from jeff (office.solutionsitconsulting.com [65.248.173.50]) by mail.wavebandwireless.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89F748E0A8; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:47:35 -0600 (CST) From: "Jeff Tollison" To: "'Dan Nelson'" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:45:33 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20050108000041.GA99385@dan.emsphone.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 thread-index: AcT1FTQTXYaSX4LTRaSOHv9OhO16zQABZ9YQ Message-Id: <20050108004735.C89F748E0A8@mail.wavebandwireless.com> cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sony autoloader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 00:47:37 -0000 pciconf -lv for the slot says: none2@pci1:7:0: class=0x010000 card=0x80101191 chip=0x80101191 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acard Technology Corp' device = 'ATP870 Ultra Wide SCSI Contoller (AEC6712UW)' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI Thanks, Jeff Tollison Network Specialist Solutions IT Consulting Waveband Wireless Internet -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dan Nelson Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 6:01 PM To: Jeff Tollison Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sony autoloader In the last episode (Jan 07), Jeff Tollison said: > I have having difficulties setting up a Sony AIT-1 External Autoloader > TSL-SA300C to work with FreeBSD 5.3. When I boot the system, I get > this: > > pci1: at device 7.0 (no driver attached) > > I have a GENERIC kernel, so I have the "device scbus" and "device ch" > installed in the kernel. Looks like you're missing the driver for your server's SCSI card. GENERIC should have all the SCSI drivers built in, though. Maybe it's a supported card using a new PCI ID. What does "pciconf -lv" say for that slot? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 00:49:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5930716A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:49:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from skippyii.compar.com (mail2.compar.com [216.208.38.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B259843D48 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:49:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from hermes (CPE00062566c7bb-CM000039c69a66.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.193.82.185])j080ukWl006527; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:56:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <005501c4f51b$89167910$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: , , References: <59.1e854c16.2f1067d4@aol.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:46:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 00:49:16 -0000 > In a message dated 1/7/05 4:50:07 PM Eastern Standard Time, > sp0ng3b0b@sbcglobal.net writes: > >Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with > >5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers. > > > >Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps > >going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? > > > >I ask this only because I don't see a lot of communication to the list > about these issues being addressed. > > Just note that they "say" its supported, but if you want to use the latest > Intel > CPUs (800Mhz FSB Xeon64), they don't work in 4.x. Sadly noone in the > FreeBSD universe is even familiar (it seems) with new server MBs. I'd say those who are familiar are using 5.x. Maybe the time to switch is near? -- Matt Emmerton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 01:06:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4706F16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:06:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212CE43D1F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:06:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1Cn53q-0005He-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:06:34 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16863.12739.926057.326712@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:05:07 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Getting USB2 on FreeBSD 5.3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:06:35 -0000 Paul Hoffman writes: > Greetings again. I have a no-name USB 2 controller card in my > server running FreeBSD 5.3. I rebuilt the kernel with the ehci > driver (simply by adding a line to copy of GENERIC and > rebuilding). The last I remember, the ehci driver was closer to alpha than beta quality (as in both flakey and feature-sparse). You should probably check the usb@ mailing list archives and even the commit logs for more information. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 01:14:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949D316A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:14:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA3343D45 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:14:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:13:58 -0600 Message-ID: <41DF33F2.6020202@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:14:26 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ryanv@metawire.org References: <200501071723.47818.ryanv@metawire.org> In-Reply-To: <200501071723.47818.ryanv@metawire.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2005 01:13:59.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[55172CF0:01C4F51F] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dns timeouts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:14:31 -0000 ryanv@metawire.org wrote: >I am new to FREEBSD and trying 5.3 on my compaq presario 2190US laptop. After >a fight I got the CD and everything running. Now my dns resolutions keep >timing out. I do not see anything on the errata, can someone point me in a >direction to do some light reading or to a patch. The problem seems simular >to a BIND problem on my openBSD NAT, but I found a source patch in Nov.. > >$ dig www.freebsd.org > >; <<>> DiG 9.3.0 <<>> www.freebsd.org > > >$ ifconfig -a >sis0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet 192.168.0.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > inet6 fe80::20d:9dff:fe84:da86%sis0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > ether 00:0d:9d:84:da:86 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active >plip0: flags=108810 mtu 1500 >lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >$ cat resolv.conf >domain puffy >nameserver 68.87.96.4 > > 1. How's connectivity? Can you ping by IP address? Try 66.94.234.13 or 216.109.112.135, for example. What's the output of `netstat -rn` ? 2. Are you running a firewall on your gateway that is either a] not handling NAT properly, or b] blocking DNS packets to your box at 192.168.0.3? Just my 2 cents...HTH, Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 01:21:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B983116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:21:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589E443D1D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:21:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j081Kedr057791 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:20:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j081K7lc058923 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:20:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j081JxJ2058908 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:19:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:19:55 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20050108011955.GA58867@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: RSS feed with ``crawl''? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:21:24 -0000 Folks, Does anybody know if there are any FBSD RSS ports that will do a horizontal scroll (in whatever GUI app)? On one BBC site they have this for all browsers...but to get their custom feed require Doze, I think. Custom app. It'd be nice to pop over to my Browser workspace at read the hourly news instead of having to bring up an audio feed on the hour. (Yes, I am getting *lazy*... I admit it :) gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 01:48:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D157116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:48:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rooster.chubbo.net (rooster.chubbo.net [168.75.98.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B658F43D2D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:48:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) Received: from rooster.chubbo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rooster.chubbo.net (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id j081mnR5060338 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:48:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by rooster.chubbo.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id j081mnvi060337 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:48:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@chubbo.net) X-Authentication-Warning: rooster.chubbo.net: nobody set sender to freebsd-questions@chubbo.net using -f Received: from c-67-169-93-71.client.comcast.net (c-67-169-93-71.client.comcast.net [67.169.93.71]) by mail.chubbo.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:48:49 -0800 Message-ID: <1105148929.41df3c013ea85@mail.chubbo.net> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:48:49 -0800 From: joseph kacmarcik To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Subject: umount gpt partitions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:48:52 -0000 hello's! forgive me if i've missed something obvious, am feeling flu-like but need to get a project done. i'm using freebsd 5.3 with gpt partitions to get filesystems more than 2TB, but when i umount and mount again, i always get: 'WARNING: /filesystem was not properly dismounted'. should i do something other than umount for gpt filesystems? tia! joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 01:59:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573D116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:59:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833B443D1D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 01:59:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from BSD-Mail@nyc.rr.com) Received: from bsd.nyc.rr.com (69-201-151-233.nyc.rr.com [69.201.151.233]) j081xYGi012331; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:59:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:00:46 -0500 From: John Wilson To: Paul Hoffman Message-Id: <20050107210046.2145a571.BSD-Mail@nyc.rr.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0rc (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting USB2 on FreeBSD 5.3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:59:45 -0000 On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:32:31 -0800 Paul Hoffman wrote: [...] > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da0: 1.000MB/s transfers [...] For what it's worth, I too am using ehci with a USB2 HD based MP3 player, and it is being reported similarly as well in regard to the 1.000MB/s transfer rate. However, according to `systat -vmstat`, I am seeing transfers in the area of 8MB/s. In regard to stability, I've had no issues at all with it. I'm sure this doesn't help at all. ;p - John. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 02:35:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FE616A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 02:35:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53601.mail.yahoo.com (web53601.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A05843D53 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 02:35:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flexble2547@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 41467 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2005 02:35:53 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=HU7TA1jrrGYC8ytRDsBpyBLWNFeFY6L8fN6v7BPL57XefoOk9r6wbcnbS2i27c5nrKpM7t/+6RsitUa3GIpuK+Ha+5z1SSMasTXQP9PPYkIjx7GQ3woHyGszLNkXnF4Ioen+qQ4YhPv2tB1ebvdIfZcl9g664wC5vj47zoIIWAQ= ; Message-ID: <20050108023553.41465.qmail@web53601.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.100.166.16] by web53601.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:35:53 PST Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:35:53 -0800 (PST) From: scott renna To: Lowell Gilbert In-Reply-To: <44wtutszxm.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NDISAPI in the kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:35:54 -0000 Thanks for the help Lowell. It happened to be I needed to make another change that, after searching a bit more, located. It's in the kernel and it's running flawlessly. There are no more intermittent drops in connectivity as there were when I was using the atheros driver. Same exact configuration on ndis0 as was on ath0, but running on the NDIS drivers it runs much better. --- Lowell Gilbert wrote: > scott renna writes: > > > I saw another user post about issues compiling in > ndis > > support into the kernel for FreeBSD 5.3. I'm also > > having an issue. I've gotten both if_ndis and > ndis > > kernel modules to load and I have connectivity to > the > > box, but I'd like to have ndis be permanent. > > You could just have the loader automatically load > the module for you > at boot time... > > > I've added the following to my kernel: > > > > options NDISAPI > > device ndis > > device wlan (this was already present in the > > default) > > > > Here's the issue I run into: > > > > make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | > > MKDEP_CPP="cc -E" CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f > .newdep -O > > -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > > -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual > > -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. > > -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica > > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq > > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter > > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/pf > > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath > > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd > > -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include > > opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 > --param > > inline-unit-growth=100 --param > > large-function-growth=1000 > -mno-align-long-strings > > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding > > /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis.c:85:30: > > ndis_driver_data.h: No such file or directory > > /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/if_ndis_pci.c:65:30: > > ndis_driver_data.h: No such file or directory > > mkdep: compile failed > > *** Error code 1 > > > > the file, ndis_driver_data.h is present in: > > > > /usr/src/sys/compat/ndis/ndis_driver_data.h > > /usr/src/sys/dev/if_ndis/ndis_driver_data.h > > /usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis/ndis_driver_data.h > > > > Where else might i put a copy of this file so the > > kernel can build itself? > > Any of the directories listed as "-I" options in the > output quoted > above should serve. I don't have that file in my > tree at all. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 02:36:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D3216A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 02:36:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gemcons.com (mail.gemcons.com [66.111.54.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB88943D31 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 02:36:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kaosent@kewd.com) Received: (qmail 73490 invoked by uid 399); 8 Jan 2005 03:58:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kewdaeahnhd04i) (68.63.186.182) by mail.gemcons.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2005 03:58:48 -0000 From: "V Foulk" To: "'Nathan Kinkade'" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:33:32 -0700 Message-ID: <000901c4f52a$74466ae0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20050107192851.GK3639@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IPFW and whois lookup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:36:42 -0000 Thanks for the reply, # ipfw list 65535 allow ip from any to any I did have more elaborate rule sets that worked great, with the exception of the whois/hostname lookups. I ran cvsup and installed world/kernel, using the same firewall rule as above. The problem seems to have stopped (as of this writing) The OS is running on an old 500mhz machine, and only the RAM is new. I had to replace the old 128MB card with a couple new ones, = since the old card failed a memory check. Since this last recompile, all has been = well and I thank you again for your response. VF -----Original Message----- From: nkinkade@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub [mailto:nkinkade@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub] On Behalf Of Nathan Kinkade Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:29 PM To: V Foulk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW and whois lookup On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 10:23:16AM -0700, V Foulk wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have recently setup IPFW on a test box, and > found that (for the most part) it was pretty straight forward. Every=20 > rule and service on the box seems to work great, except for one=20 > problem I haven't been able to track down. Regardless of the=20 > settings, even when set to **open as default with only the allow all=20 > from any to any rule**, whois and hostname lookups fail. >=20 > This problem prevented clamav from updating, and a whole > slew of other minor issues that pop up in the logs. I was hoping > someone may be able to point out something that I may have missed? >=20 > When IPFW is enabled: > When the service uses the local NS, a manual whois gives: > whois: connect(): No route to host >=20 > When the service uses the upstream NS, a manual whois gives: > whois: com.whois-servers.net: hostname nor servname provided, or not=20 > known >=20 > (NS as set in resolv.conf) >=20 > The only way I can make the error 'go away' is to disable ipfw in=20 > rc.conf and reboot. >=20 > I am certain that this is just a silly oversight on my part. The=20 > machine is running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p13, please let me know if=20 > there is any other information I can provide that will be useful.=20 > Thank you very much, > in advance, for the help. >=20 > VF The output of `ipfw list` would be very helpful. Nathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 03:04:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF6F16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:04:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from knife.dreamhost.com (knife.dreamhost.com [66.33.219.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5691943D3F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@tntluoma.com) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (user-33qt9ff.dialup.mindspring.com [199.174.165.239]) by knife.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A42E4EE4; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:04:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49600.24.11.146.21.1104942926.squirrel@24.11.146.21> References: <1E7FDB38-5E7A-11D9-AD10-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <200501050841.03874.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> <0AAB74E3-5F2E-11D9-BE17-000D93AD26C8@tntluoma.com> <49600.24.11.146.21.1104942926.squirrel@24.11.146.21> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Timothy Luoma Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:04:08 -0500 To: "Charles Ulrich" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: jquinby@node.to cc: FreeBSD-Questions Questions Subject: m'gettying closer! (was Re: modem not responding to mgetty) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:04:12 -0000 Update on progress on project "ppp dialin". I am following the instructions at http://node.to/freebsd/how-tos/how-to-freebsd-pppserver.html. On the advice of Charles Ulrich on FBSD-Questions, I bought a serial modem Creative Modem Blaster v.92 Model DE5621. I shut off the machine, hooked up the modem (removed the old PCI modem) and rebooted. Here's the relevant configuration that I have (note: 5.3, standard kernel) I am unsure about several things - should be using cuaa0 or ttyd0 (I am using mgetty)? - are the 'set ifaddr' lines right in ppp.conf? I'm using 192.168.1.x and have selected unused IP addresses in that range $ fgrep mgetty /etc/ttys|fgrep -v '#' ttyd0 "/usr/local/sbin/mgetty -s 115200" dialup on secure note: in ppp.conf, I'm not sure if I need ttyd0 or cuaa0. (NOTE: FRED is not really the username) $ cat /etc/ppp/ppp.conf default: set device /dev/cuaa0 set debug log Phase Chat LCP IPCP CCP tun command set speed 115200 set dial "ABORT BUSY ABORT NO\\sCARRIER TIMEOUT 5 \"\" AT OK-AT-OK ATE1Q0 OK \\dATDT\\TTIMEOUT 40 CONNECT" set timeout 120 set ifaddr 192.168.1.1/0 192.168.1.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 add default HISADDR cuaa0: set ifaddr 192.168.1.3 192.168.1.4-192.168.1.9 enable passwdauth allow users FRED ppp accept dns set dns 67.36.13.26 enable proxy ttyd0: set ifaddr 192.168.1.3 192.168.1.4-192.168.1.9 enable passwdauth allow users FRED ppp accept dns set dns 67.36.13.26 enable proxy $ cat /usr/local/etc/mgetty+sendfax/mgetty.config port cuaa0 debug 4 fax-id 00 00 000000 speed 115200 direct NO blocking NO port-owner uucp port-group uucp port-mode 0660 toggle-dtr YES toggle-dtr-waittime 500 data-only YES fax-only NO modem-type auto init-chat "" AT OK modem-check-time 3600 rings 1 answer-chat "" ATA CONNECT \c \r answer-chat-timeout 30 autobauding NO ringback NO ringback-time 30 ignore-carrier false issue-file /etc/issue prompt-waittime 500 login-prompt @!login: login-time 240 diskspace 1024 notify faxadmin fax-owner uucp fax-group modem fax-mode 0660 $ fgrep ppp /etc/passwd ppp:*:1003:1003:ppp:/home/ppp:/etc/ppp/ppp-dialup $ ls -l /etc/ppp/ppp-dialup -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 258 Jan 7 19:56 /etc/ppp/ppp-dialup* (the content of the script is the same from the webpage, which says it is the same as the FreeBSD handbook) XXXXXXX is the dialin number here is what I get on the *client end* when I try to dial my PPP server Fri Jan 7 21:12:06 2005 : Dialing XXXXXXX Fri Jan 7 21:12:06 2005 : CCLWrite : ATDTXXXXXXX\13 Fri Jan 7 21:12:37 2005 : CCLMatched : +ER: Fri Jan 7 21:12:37 2005 : CCLMatched : LAPM Fri Jan 7 21:12:37 2005 : Modem Reliable Link Established. Fri Jan 7 21:12:37 2005 : CCLMatched : +DR: Fri Jan 7 21:12:37 2005 : CCLMatched : V42B\13 Fri Jan 7 21:12:37 2005 : Modem Compression Established. Fri Jan 7 21:12:37 2005 : CCLMatched : CONNECT Fri Jan 7 21:12:37 2005 : CCLMatched : 26400 Fri Jan 7 21:12:40 2005 : Serial connection established. Fri Jan 7 21:12:40 2005 : using link 0 Fri Jan 7 21:12:40 2005 : Using interface ppp0 Fri Jan 7 21:12:40 2005 : Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cu.modem Fri Jan 7 21:12:41 2005 : sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 ] Fri Jan 7 21:12:41 2005 : Hangup (SIGHUP) Fri Jan 7 21:12:41 2005 : Modem hangup Fri Jan 7 21:12:41 2005 : Connection terminated. and here is what happens on the *server* end tail -50 /var/log/mgetty.ttyd0 01/07 21:12:35 yd0 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.31-Jul24 01/07 21:12:35 yd0 check for lockfiles 01/07 21:12:35 yd0 locking the line 01/07 21:12:36 yd0 lowering DTR to reset Modem 01/07 21:12:36 yd0 send: \dATQ0V1H0[0d] 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 waiting for ``OK'' ** found ** 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 send: ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1[0d] 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 waiting for ``OK'' ** found ** 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 mdm_send: 'ATI' 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 Generic Rockwell modem (56000) 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 mdm_send: 'ATI3' 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 mdm_send: 'ATI4' 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 additional info: 'a007040284C6002F' 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 modem quirks: 0004 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 mdm_send: 'AT+FCLASS=2' -> OK 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 mdm_send: 'AT+FCLASS=0' -> OK 01/07 21:12:37 yd0 mdm_send: 'AT+FAA=1;+FCR=1' -> OK 01/07 21:12:38 yd0 mdm_send: 'AT+FBOR=0' -> OK 01/07 21:12:38 yd0 mdm_send: 'AT+FLID="49 115 xxxxxxxx"' -> OK 01/07 21:12:38 yd0 mdm_send: 'AT+FDCC=1,5,0,2,0,0,0,0' -> OK 01/07 21:12:38 yd0 waiting... [as far as I know, everything before this is just mgetty setting up, and the rest is what happens when a call comes in] 01/07 21:16:04 yd0 wfr: waiting for ``RING'' 01/07 21:16:04 yd0 send: ATA[0d] 01/07 21:16:04 yd0 waiting for ``CONNECT'' ** found ** 01/07 21:16:30 yd0 send: 01/07 21:16:30 yd0 waiting for ``_'' ** found ** 01/07 21:16:34 ##### data dev=ttyd0, pid=966, caller='none', conn='115200', name='', cmd='/etc/ppp/ppp-pap-dialup', user='/AutoPPP/' [at that point mgetty just resets] So it's been a long day, and I've banged my head against this for a couple hours. Going to eat. Any ideas will be appreciated. TjL From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 03:47:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9257B16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:47:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C4A43D1D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:46:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 40671 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 19:46:49 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 19:46:49 -0800 Message-ID: <41DF579F.5090709@taborandtashell.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:46:39 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20050107225850.GA32279@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050107225850.GA32279@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Karl Agee cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Device Perms in 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:47:00 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:54:28PM -0800, Karl Agee wrote: > >>I want to use 5.3 as a desktop system, but I am having some problems with >>device permissions. Since devfs re-creates devices on boot I have to redo >>the perms everytime I want to use these devices. Listening to audio cd's, >>watching dvd's or burning cd's/dvd's. Gets a little annoying. >> >>How can I "peg" device permissions the way I want them...other than using >>it on a daily basis as root? > > > man devfs > > Kris Or you could write a script to do it every time you boot. But 'man devfs' will probably tell you the "correct" way to do it. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 03:52:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D0C16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:52:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53004.mail.yahoo.com (web53004.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C5CB43D39 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rpc_jll@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 51545 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2005 03:52:16 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=K84k/+PgkYRYTNacmQcyhztW+tcILyqrZWn4wtMMPIh+9FQYsk7wwFZVcR/eYFCkoUlYB4arrYplsLjGUZBSHMXl9SgMYw7iUmlwWCQJ7JC8oUwDFf2iiLy9fCUD/VBYcrR/HwHyc7s4Q/n5QVIGINFFDoijMDAVQvkiy5XsMtc= ; Message-ID: <20050108035216.51543.qmail@web53004.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.163.230.14] by web53004.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:52:15 PST Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:52:15 -0800 (PST) From: Bens To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: hardware compatiblity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:52:17 -0000 Good day to you all, Im looking for a motherboard that will serve as our FreeBSD server, I have some difficulty finding the right review for MSI 865PE Neo2 platinum edition motherboard. Is this motherboard and its integrated components compatible with FreeBSD release 5.3? Kindly please help me with this. Hoping for your reply, thanks and more power to all. Benson of Dagupan City, Philippines __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 03:57:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF01716A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:57:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay16-f36.bay16.hotmail.com [65.54.186.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4C243D3F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 03:57:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjn0211@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:57:00 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 202.183.248.166 by by16fd.bay16.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:56:31 GMT X-Originating-IP: [202.183.248.166] X-Originating-Email: [pjn0211@hotmail.com] X-Sender: pjn0211@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <20050107202042.GB865@procyon.nekulturny.org> From: "Supote Leelasupphakorn" To: flowers@users.sourceforge.net Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:56:31 +0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2005 03:57:00.0454 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B13D460:01C4F536] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Able to mount samba but it's empty X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:57:01 -0000 Hi list, But I do enable bigLba in Windows' registry already, As I can use full of 200 GB capacity disk. The problem occurred only when it was mounted Windows's disk from FreeBSD with command: mount_smbfs, I found nothing in the mount point. Any comments are welcome TIA ----Original Message Follows---- From: Danny MacMillan To: Supote Leelasupphakorn CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Able to mount samba but it's empty Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:20:42 -0700 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:44:02PM +0700, Supote Leelasupphakorn wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm using 4.8-RELEASE-p15 and Samba-2.2.8a for mounting > shared directory on Windows2000 (NTFS). So far the disk on > Windows2000 is only 120 GB and mounting is successful. > > But after I changed a disk to 200GB, I can sucessfully mount > both 120GB and 200GB (I mean no any error message are > displayed) but I can't see any file in the mount point of 200GB > disk. I googled for a while but no any answer useful. Is there > any problem with 200 GB disk on Samba-2.2.8 OR it's time to > upgraded the Samba's version OR I missed something ? Is the disk in the machine running Windows 2000? If so, you will want to ensure that you have enabled Big LBA support on the Windows side, if you haven't already. There's a 137GB barrier in Windows 2k that can cause major data loss, as I learned the hard way. I don't know if it has any impact on Samba, but since the drives are on either side of the barrier it's worth looking into. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/305098/EN-US/ If you haven't enabled this yet, do it. If you don't you will lose data, you will lose data, you will lose data. Even if you haven't lost data yet, you will. It might not make Samba work, but it will make Windows 2000 work. -- Danny P.S. I'm not kidding. If you love your data (and who doesn't), go enable 48 bit LBA. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 04:17:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA1616A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 04:17:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C278543D2D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 04:17:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heath0504@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so791wri for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:17:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=aBcS1LtGMho5IsSKB88uaIykD1nmH+/004VdP1IHsRRkPmgVAYbAU110DIyrG/4KN5ILgJvkbAfTRZkeoldAKZXVl/rFAR2z0duGsrJbyUgnV6aPDNd0jPRA244bfWtKn+xxe4tLgWdXMgwZ6mIlXPlTx6u1MD35x4P8uJzaSJ4= Received: by 10.54.49.33 with SMTP id w33mr88760wrw; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:17:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from linuxlmx20ji5l ([61.59.129.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 44sm157195wri.2005.01.07.20.17.16; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:17:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <003a01c4f538$f72e0ae0$f8813b3d@linuxlmx20ji5l> From: "heath, Chia Hui Chen" To: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:17:25 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: How can I limit some port according to ethernet card MAC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:17:19 -0000 Hello, I use FreeBSD 5.2.1 as NAT. How can I limit some port (packet in and out) according to ethernet card MAC ? Because we use dhcpd, and the IP is dynamic, so I wanna limit it by MAC. What can I do? Thanks for your response! Best Regards, - heath From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 04:43:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0B016A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 04:43:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA7743D49 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 04:43:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ggcameron@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id g11so352660rne for ; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:43:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=RQ+cAatzw3FDmCcxzkr+3LenLzuBK19WBBhRxUIqQ0iOYrLjDmuzyjD2MDPfpJl+336lSljVxedQobHELJGr+fKDEg3LKnfgGlBwcqHiAf60Znfd2SFnzLhcHPzEQK7Th40ndQRlrozWUuZi5/UhWO5Me7kBDyEHadjdSYdDHWI= Received: by 10.38.68.14 with SMTP id q14mr171306rna; Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:43:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.102.80 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:43:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1efd1aec0501072043ea3ff35@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:43:22 +1100 From: Gavin Cameron To: "heath, Chia Hui Chen" In-Reply-To: <003a01c4f538$f72e0ae0$f8813b3d@linuxlmx20ji5l> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <003a01c4f538$f72e0ae0$f8813b3d@linuxlmx20ji5l> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I limit some port according to ethernet card MAC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gavin Cameron List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:43:24 -0000 IPFW allows you to filter based on MAC addresses. man ipfw Cheers Gavin On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:17:25 +0800, heath, Chia Hui Chen wrote: > Hello, > I use FreeBSD 5.2.1 as NAT. > How can I limit some port (packet in and out) according to ethernet card MAC > ? > Because we use dhcpd, and the IP is dynamic, so I wanna limit it by MAC. > What can I do? Thanks for your response! > > Best Regards, > - heath > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 05:55:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5273516A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 05:55:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9F843D55; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 05:55:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j085tOj42688; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:55:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "alexei kozlov" , Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 21:55:24 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <41DD8A3F.1040004@nordlines.ru> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Question re: GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:55:34 -0000 Ask on the freebsd-amd64 mailing list. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of alexei kozlov > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 10:58 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Question re: GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 > > > Hello, Gurus. > > My fellow asked me if GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 supports 64bit memory > pointers. He means is it possible to allocate *very* big (4GB and more) > chunks of storage? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 05:56:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C571516A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 05:56:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.1.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848CD43D39 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 05:56:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EB6A734F; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:56:11 -0500 (EST) Received: (from fj@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id j085uBU06842; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:56:11 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:56:11 -0500 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050108055611.GA27077@panix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ronny Fischer , doug@safeport.com References: <20050106232123.AC3BA16A4D2@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050106232123.AC3BA16A4D2@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: doug@safeport.com cc: Ronny Fischer Subject: Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:56:12 -0000 Doug, Ronny... I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28, 2004 using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have a default depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using the ati driver. Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the most recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on December 28th. Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what is above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest source for xorg and the chip in question. HTH, best regards, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 06:03:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E621916A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:03:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD2F43D39; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:03:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j08639G5095320; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:03:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost)j08639xT095319; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:03:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:03:08 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20050108060308.GA95301@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <41DD8A3F.1040004@nordlines.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: alexei kozlov Subject: Re: Question re: GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:03:10 -0000 On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:55:24PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > My fellow asked me if GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 supports 64bit memory > > pointers. He means is it possible to allocate *very* big (4GB and more) > > chunks of storage? Yes. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 06:03:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A83416A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:03:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A6443D39; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:03:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0865mWj011123; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:05:48 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j0865m3I011122; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:05:48 -0800 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:05:47 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20050108060547.GA11052@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <41DD8A3F.1040004@nordlines.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: alexei kozlov Subject: Re: Question re: GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:03:46 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of alexei kozlov > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 10:58 AM > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Question re: GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 > >=20 > > My fellow asked me if GCC on FreeBSD for AMD64 supports 64bit memory=20 > > pointers. He means is it possible to allocate *very* big (4GB and more= )=20 > > chunks of storage? Yes, there wouldn't be much point otherwise. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB33g7XY6L6fI4GtQRAlcYAKCwOR38+NRbLY7uxNGHZrDcSDX3YwCfeZA0 fqnzXQhGfQybg3Gv5KdKuRM= =DiXX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 06:18:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F56C16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:18:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9716643D49 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:18:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j086H9j42764; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:17:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Peter Risdon" , "Colin J. Raven" Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:17:09 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1105093004.708.115.camel@lorna.circlesquared.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:18:35 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Risdon [mailto:peter@circlesquared.com] > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 2:17 AM > To: Colin J. Raven > Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; FreeBSD Questions > Subject: RE: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. > > > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 11:12 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: > > On Jan 7 at 09:41, Peter Risdon launched this into the bitstream: > > > > > On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 09:59 +0100, Colin J. Raven wrote: > > >> On Jan 6 at 21:41, Ted Mittelstaedt launched this into the bitstream: > > >> > > >>> Use IMP. > [...] > > > > Now you mention it, I seem to recall a shedload of issues if you had to > > download the source and build it by hand. There were definite > gotchas in > > that process I believe. > > > > > > How so? It's PHP. There's nothing to build. > There were a number of gotchas that were serious EARLIER ON. Here's a list of the ones I ran into: 1) The versions of IMP and Horde in the ports tree were old and had security holes thus had to be scratched 2) X Windows is a dependency on one of the subsidiary programs so you have to plan your disk partition strategy. 3) IMP's config file used the name wvHtml for the MS Word viewer and first time I ran across this I spent at least an hour finding out that this program had been renamed "wv" (wv requires imagemagic which requires X and a great many other programs) 4) IMP looks for user programs (like ispell) in /usr/bin not /usr/local/bin 5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a self-signed key (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache docs that say use make key or whatnot don't work) 6) There's no list anywhere of what drivers in php IMP needs you have to guess. (ie: ldap) 7) Using a different imap server than uw-imap might cause trouble with php, as that port installs the uw-imap client libraries. 8) All kinds of dumb-ass file naming issues with default config files from when php went to php4. (ie: .php3 to .php) 9) uw-imap that ports installs was old and had security hole 10) php.ini and local.inc in phplib supplied by Horde has wrong pathnames in it 11) php.ini doesen't have extension-imap.so and mysql.so in it 12) Not clear that dirs horde-1.2.3 and imp-2.2.3 need to be renamed horde and imp 13) - the instructions place phplib into the document root, and local.inc is in there, so a command like: https://machinename.com/horde/phplib/local.inc Will open up the local.inc file in all it’s glory. You can you can move phplib from /usr/local/www/htdocs/horde/phplib to /usr/local/www/phplib and change all the references to point to there. Most of these are due to misinterpretaitons of the install docs, which exist because the install docs were written by someone who thinks that concise writing is a good thing with instructions. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 06:28:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144B616A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:28:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C01F43D54; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:28:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) id j086SjZp025065; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:28:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:28:45 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Jeff Tollison Message-ID: <20050108062845.GA10306@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050108000041.GA99385@dan.emsphone.com> <20050108004735.C89F748E0A8@mail.wavebandwireless.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050108004735.C89F748E0A8@mail.wavebandwireless.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sony autoloader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:28:47 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 07), Jeff Tollison said: > pciconf -lv for the slot says: > > none2@pci1:7:0: class=0x010000 card=0x80101191 chip=0x80101191 rev=0x01 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Acard Technology Corp' > device = 'ATP870 Ultra Wide SCSI Contoller (AEC6712UW)' > class = mass storage > subclass = SCSI Unfortunately, I don't think there are any FreeBSD drivers for Acard controllers. There are about 3 requests a year asking about Acard support, so unless one of them volunteers to write a driver, you may be better off getting a cheap Adaptec or Symbios card. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 06:30:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5DF16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:30:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3F843D31 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:30:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j086UBj42824; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:30:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "sp0ng3b0b" , Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:30:11 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <41DF03E3.6040605@sbcglobal.net> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: RE: How long will 4.x be supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:30:14 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of sp0ng3b0b > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 1:49 PM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: How long will 4.x be supported? > > > Given the serious stability issues that *some* users are having with > 5.3, many are sticking with 4.x for production servers. > > Will FreeBSD keep the 4.x line alive for a little while longer? Perhaps > going into 4.12, 4.13, etc? http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.10R/announce.html Note the line: "The current plans are for one more FreeBSD 4.X release which will be FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE. It is expected the upcoming FreeBSD 5.3 release will have reached the maturity level most users will be able to migrate to 5.X" Keep an eye on the release notes for 4.11 when it goes golden. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 06:30:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C4716A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:30:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from munk.nu (mail.munk.nu [213.152.51.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAECF43D2D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:30:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from munk@munk.nu) Received: from munk by munk.nu with local (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CnA7Q-000OhJ-Fj; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:30:36 +0000 Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:30:36 +0000 From: Jez Hancock To: Alexandr Lookoshkoff Message-ID: <20050108063036.GA70354@munk.nu> Mail-Followup-To: Alexandr Lookoshkoff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1325122753.20050104154355@inbox.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1325122753.20050104154355@inbox.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Jez Hancock cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: traffic counting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:30:41 -0000 On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:43:55PM +0500, Alexandr Lookoshkoff wrote: > > How to make such thing as traffic counting? > > There is a gateway (with NAT) and a local network. Every month > i must send a report how many traffic get everybody. > > What tool can help me with it? There's a hack I use that's detailed here: http://ipfwstats.sf.net/ essentially a shell rc script runs at boot time to create an ipfw 'count' rule for each user on the server. The counts are then collected via cron at the end of each day and dropped into a mysql db. The db can then be queried by a php script from a web server to display statistics to the end user/admin/etc. Fairly simple but worked for me at the time. -- Jez Hancock - System Administrator / PHP Developer http://munk.nu/ http://jez.hancock-family.com/ - Another FreeBSD Diary http://ipfwstats.sf.net/ - ipfw peruser traffic logging From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 06:42:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F194016A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:42:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B79D43D49 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 06:42:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j086gJj42876; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:42:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:42:19 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:42:22 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tm4528@aol.com > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 2:23 PM > To: tedm@toybox.placo.com > Cc: questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Supermicro Hardware and FreeBSD > > > If you nor any of the FreeBSD developers "know" about the 75xx series of > chipsets, I had a feeling something like this would have come out of your trap, so I took the precaution of e-mailing the people yesterday who had filed PR i386/72579 yesterday. The results are available here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72579 The original author of the PR has not responded, and the one followup author responded to my query saying that it was bad hardware, and that his other 75xx-based SuperMicro board works fine. Your friend Boris who was the OP on this thread has also slunk away and hidden since he has not posted a followup to the PR in question either. > > I posted exactly why 5.x is slower than 4.x, If you know so much about it I suggest you open a new PR on the topic so the development team can look into it. Of course, to do this you have to actually OWN a system with one of these chipsets, running FreeBSD 5.3. We await your PR. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 07:21:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E60716A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:21:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.fr (smtp5.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEF143D31 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:21:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0506.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id CC41B1C002A4 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:21:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0506.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B216C1C002A5 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:21:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:21:07 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1883206833.20050108082107@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41DF15F8.1070900@yahoo.com> References: <343219484.20050107233602@wanadoo.fr> <41DF15F8.1070900@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Is there a problem with syslogd -a? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:21:09 -0000 Rob writes: R> On 5.3, I have following in rc.conf: R> syslogd_flags="-a 192.168.123.0/24 -b 192.168.123.254" R> R> on the machine that has IP 192.168.123.254. R> It serves a cluster of 192.168.123.X with X = 1 to 7 R> R> /etc/syslog.conf on the 192.168.123.X PCs has: R> *.* @192.168.123.254 R> R> and all syslog messages arrive on 192.168.123.254 and are stored there. Thanks. I had not used the -b argument, but I think I found the problem: I have to put -a 10.0.0.0/24:* in order to accept messages from something other than syslog. I'm not sure what the router is calling itself,but apparently syslog isn't it. When I use the wildcard, it works. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 07:54:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D23116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:54:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outside.taborandtashell.net (sub18-33.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.18.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC19B43D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net) Received: (qmail 41090 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 23:54:02 -0800 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.9?) (tkelly@192.168.0.9) by 192.168.0.2 with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 23:54:02 -0800 Message-ID: <41DF9191.4070408@taborandtashell.net> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:53:53 -0800 From: Tabor Kelly User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041230) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "Colin J. Raven" cc: Peter Risdon cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:54:12 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > 5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a > self-signed > key (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache docs that > say use make key or whatnot don't work) I am not doubting you that this was an issue. But it is now documented quite nicely in the mod_ssl faq (http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html). Also (as a side note), I use CAcert (http://www.cacert.org) for my key signing needs. -- Tabor Kelly tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net http://tabor.taborandtashell.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 08:10:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9341816A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:10:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (fia148-72.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.72.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D19343D39 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:10:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl) Received: from localhost (colin@localhost) by kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0884vI00390; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:09:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:04:56 +0100 From: "Colin J. Raven" To: Tabor Kelly In-Reply-To: <41DF9191.4070408@taborandtashell.net> Message-ID: References: <41DF9191.4070408@taborandtashell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: Peter Risdon cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: Webmail Frontend to mailboxes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:10:50 -0000 On Jan 7 at 23:53, Tabor Kelly launched this into the bitstream: > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >> 5) many issues with getting Apache mod-SSL running properly with a >> self-signed >> key (you have to generate it manually with openssl, the apache docs that >> say use make key or whatnot don't work) > > I am not doubting you that this was an issue. But it is now documented quite > nicely in the mod_ssl faq (http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html). Also > (as a side note), I use CAcert (http://www.cacert.org) for my key signing > needs. Good tip, thanks for sharing it!!!! Regards, -Colin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 08:21:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D53116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:21:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E0243D39 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:21:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2005010808214701300t0jp1e>; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:21:47 +0000 Message-ID: <41DF97F3.9020808@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:21:07 -0500 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: koffice 1.3.5 build error, 'm_player' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:21:48 -0000 I am trying to build koffice 1.3.5 and am running into the error below. So far can not find much on this problem. Can anyone help? Thanks Sean System info ($ uname -a FreeBSD tardis.mydomain.net 6.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jan 5 22:19:02 EST 2005 sean@tardis.mydomain.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TARDISKERNEL amd64 $ ) NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -MT kpresenter_sound_player.lo -MD -MP -MF ".deps/kpresenter_sound_player.Tpo" \ -c -o kpresenter_sound_player.lo `test -f 'kpresenter_sound_player.cc' || echo './'`kpresenter_sound_player.cc; \ then mv -f ".deps/kpresenter_sound_player.Tpo" ".deps/kpresenter_sound_player.Plo"; \ else rm -f ".deps/kpresenter_sound_player.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi kpresenter_sound_player.cc:33:29: kartsdispatcher.h: No such file or directory kpresenter_sound_player.cc:34:32: kplayobjectfactory.h: No such file or directory kpresenter_sound_player.cc:51: error: `KArtsDispatcher' does not name a type kpresenter_sound_player.cc:53: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `KPlayObjectFactory' with no type kpresenter_sound_player.cc:53: error: expected `;' before '*' token kpresenter_sound_player.cc:54: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `KPlayObject' with no type kpresenter_sound_player.cc:54: error: expected `;' before '*' token kpresenter_sound_player.cc: In constructor `KPresenterSoundPlayer::KPresenterSoundPlayer(const QString&, QObject*, const char*)': kpresenter_sound_player.cc:65: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_factory' kpresenter_sound_player.cc:65: error: `KPlayObjectFactory' has not been declared kpresenter_sound_player.cc:66: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_player' kpresenter_sound_player.cc: In destructor `virtual KPresenterSoundPlayer::~KPresenterSoundPlayer()': kpresenter_sound_player.cc:73: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_player' kpresenter_sound_player.cc:74: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_factory' kpresenter_sound_player.cc: In member function `void KPresenterSoundPlayer::stop()': kpresenter_sound_player.cc:88: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_player' kpresenter_sound_player.cc:89: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_player' kpresenter_sound_player.cc: In member function `void KPresenterSoundPlayer::play()': kpresenter_sound_player.cc:99: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_player' kpresenter_sound_player.cc:101: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_player' kpresenter_sound_player.cc:101: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_factory' kpresenter_sound_player.cc:102: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_player' kpresenter_sound_player.cc:103: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_player' kpresenter_sound_player.cc:106: error: 'class KPresenterSoundPlayerPrivate' has no member named 'm_player' gmake[3]: *** [kpresenter_sound_player.lo] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/editors/koffice-kde3/work/koffice-1.3.5/kpresenter' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/editors/koffice-kde3/work/koffice-1.3.5/kpresenter' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/editors/koffice-kde3/work/koffice-1.3.5' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/koffice-kde3. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 08:40:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB62116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:40:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.terralink.de (mail.tlink.de [217.9.16.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C1443D54 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 08:40:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de (daniel-s-haischt.biz [84.252.66.2]) by mail.terralink.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EF2BD6A6; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:40:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90115188DB; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:40:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 09725-05; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:40:41 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: none (smtp.abyssworld.de: 192.168.1.6 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of daniel.stefan.haischt.name) client-ip=192.168.1.6; envelope-from=me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name; helo=[192.168.120.239]; Received: from [192.168.120.239] (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AE5188DA; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:40:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DF9C83.7060400@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:40:35 +0100 From: "Daniel S. Haischt" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tkelly-freebsd-questions@taborandtashell.net References: <20050107225850.GA32279@xor.obsecurity.org> <41DF579F.5090709@taborandtashell.net> In-Reply-To: <41DF579F.5090709@taborandtashell.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Processed-By: GNU Anubis v4.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at abyssworld.de cc: Karl Agee cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Device Perms in 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 08:40:44 -0000 I don't know whether this has been brought to the table before, but why don't you set your perms in /etc/devfs.conf. You know if you are using devfs you should also use the appropriate configuration file ... Tabor Kelly schrieb: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:54:28PM -0800, Karl Agee wrote: >> >>> I want to use 5.3 as a desktop system, but I am having some problems >>> with device permissions. Since devfs re-creates devices on boot I >>> have to redo the perms everytime I want to use these devices. >>> Listening to audio cd's, watching dvd's or burning cd's/dvd's. Gets >>> a little annoying. >>> >>> How can I "peg" device permissions the way I want them...other than >>> using it on a daily basis as root? >> >> >> >> man devfs >> >> Kris > > > Or you could write a script to do it every time you boot. But 'man > devfs' will probably tell you the "correct" way to do it. > -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards Daniel S. Haischt Wan't a complete signature??? Type at a shell prompt: $ > finger -l haischt@daniel.stefan.haischt.name From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 09:08:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324FF16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:08:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9AB43D4C for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:08:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-208-232.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.208.232]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0898AHs026492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 04:08:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <41DFA302.8060508@mac.com> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:08:18 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bens References: <20050108035216.51543.qmail@web53004.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050108035216.51543.qmail@web53004.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.5 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on pi.codefab.com cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hardware compatiblity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:08:16 -0000 Bens wrote: > Im looking for a motherboard that will serve as > our FreeBSD server, I have some difficulty finding the > right review for MSI 865PE Neo2 platinum edition > motherboard. Is this motherboard and its integrated > components compatible with FreeBSD release 5.3? It's likely that the integrated LAN chip (Intel 82562EZ) will work with FreeBSD, yes; you may have problems with using SATA RAID or using USB v2, although USB v1.1 speeds should be OK. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 13:22:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5333316A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:22:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB8443D2F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:22:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heath0504@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so19943wri for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:22:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=qkBTWzT5H0Xg4Ku0iQoWXpaHmXxCAzWXHly+ePkAH6KkKweSBYK8eZawWP14csDZTCgnU6a8jylEbHF4d8jkZCgvL8xU1/BWogV67MvksoX4dZgpEd4urRp1j8eW2Xc4JftMpxipe870TwcN/W6ymYfkmPlOUZMuvKHXaX6T0kc= Received: by 10.54.14.29 with SMTP id 29mr8933wrn; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:22:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from linuxlmx20ji5l ([61.59.129.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 44sm180950wri.2005.01.08.05.22.06; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:22:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <007e01c4f585$13d86220$f8813b3d@linuxlmx20ji5l> From: "heath, Chia Hui Chen" To: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:22:15 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: ipfw + MAC nothing happens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:22:08 -0000 Hello, I use FreeBSD 5.2.1 as NAT. I wanna limit the 443 port of a computer based on MAC address. So I use ipfw. # ipfw add 500 deny tcp from any to any 443 MAC any 00:e0:18:62:xx:xx But nothing happens, can anybody tells me why? Thanks for your response. Best Regards, - heath From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 13:41:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41EC16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:41:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from webmail.uoi.gr (webmail.uoi.gr [195.130.120.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9A043D45 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:41:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkouroun@cc.uoi.gr) Received: from webmail.uoi.gr (localhost [127.0.0.1])j08DfbNP003779 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:41:38 +0200 Received: (from wwwrun@localhost) by webmail.uoi.gr (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j08DfbHa003778 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:41:37 +0200 Received: from 212-70-197-166.rod.dialup.tee.gr (212-70-197-166.rod.dialup.tee.gr [212.70.197.166]) by webmail.uoi.gr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:41:37 +0200 Message-ID: <1105191697.41dfe311aea10@webmail.uoi.gr> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:41:37 +0200 From: dkouroun@cc.uoi.gr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20050108120107.1BD0B16A500@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050108120107.1BD0B16A500@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 212.70.197.166 Subject: Plans about GIANT-LOCK, SMP performance ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:41:42 -0000 Dear users, Does anybody know what are the plans, for locking mechanism like GIANT-LOCK in future 5.3 Releases? I have heard from many people that this GIANT-Locking mechanism is not the best thing to have! Some said that it may be replaced. Some also said that it won't. 1:) What are the plans about it? 2:) How does this affect performance? 3:) Which is version is best for an Opteron QUAD? 4.10 Release or > 5.X Release ??? Thanks in advance! D.K. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 13:58:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA32B16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:58:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7681943D2D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:58:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from heath0504@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so21427wri for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:58:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=hfmlkdxN+puV75VLBWipagVuXRoex2eoW89A/3RLn6VXoHIjLdVwccUQ0Y6KbwX4X5Id2PcyxZQtOexPEgHLfNLQxjfAzzyH23y6Sw9B6uH+KyeX+fmnXPjKlsEUO71ga9VMtOdYkoiqL8XZAeKXZEV7vApDMlLBkjBAIvAhqdU= Received: by 10.54.27.65 with SMTP id a65mr20161wra; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:58:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from linuxlmx20ji5l ([61.59.129.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 44sm182364wri.2005.01.08.05.58.00; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:58:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <008f01c4f58a$1849d3c0$f8813b3d@linuxlmx20ji5l> From: "heath, Chia Hui Chen" To: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:58:09 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: ipfw + MAC nothing happens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:58:04 -0000 my ipfw rules is: 00050 divert 8668 ip from any to any via fxp0 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00500 deny tcp from any to any dst-port 443 MAC any 00:e0:18:62:xx:xx 65000 allow ip from any to any 65535 deny ip from any to any ----- Original Message ----- From: heath, Chia Hui Chen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:22 PM Subject: ipfw + MAC nothing happens? Hello, I use FreeBSD 5.2.1 as NAT. I wanna limit the 443 port of a computer based on MAC address. So I use ipfw. # ipfw add 500 deny tcp from any to any 443 MAC any 00:e0:18:62:xx:xx But nothing happens, can anybody tells me why? Thanks for your response. Best Regards, - heath From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 14:48:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E440816A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:48:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5E543D1F; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:47:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j08Ep1wl030949; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:51:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <41DFF232.60007@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:46:10 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <20050108000041.GA99385@dan.emsphone.com> <20050108004735.C89F748E0A8@mail.wavebandwireless.com> <20050108062845.GA10306@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20050108062845.GA10306@dan.emsphone.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Jeff Tollison Subject: Re: Sony autoloader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:48:01 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 07), Jeff Tollison said: > >> pciconf -lv for the slot says: >> >>none2@pci1:7:0: class=0x010000 card=0x80101191 chip=0x80101191 rev=0x01 >>hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Acard Technology Corp' >> device = 'ATP870 Ultra Wide SCSI Contoller (AEC6712UW)' >> class = mass storage >> subclass = SCSI > > > Unfortunately, I don't think there are any FreeBSD drivers for Acard > controllers. There are about 3 requests a year asking about Acard > support, so unless one of them volunteers to write a driver, you may be > better off getting a cheap Adaptec or Symbios card. > There looks to be a linux driver, so writing one for FreeBSD shouldn't be impossible. Where does one get one of these cards? Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 14:55:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CFE16A4CF for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:55:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web61006.mail.yahoo.com (web61006.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D9B043D31 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:55:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 10973 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2005 14:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20050108145500.10971.qmail@web61006.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.86.20.47] by web61006.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 11:55:00 ART Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:55:00 -0300 (ART) From: "E. J. Cerejo" To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: FreeBSD Sound not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:55:01 -0000 Hello, I upgraded to FreeBSD 5.3 with a clean install and now I can't get the sound to work on my machine, I have Creative AudioPCI (ES1371, ES1373), this card under 4.x stable use to work fine with device pcm in kernel file but now under FreeBSD 5.3 the handbook tells me to use these two lines for the same thing: device sound device "snd_emu10k1" I get now no sound at all, if I run dmesg I see no pcm lines at all or cat /dev/sndstat get nothing for sound. Any ideas as to why not? Best regards, Ed --------------------------------- Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 14:59:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2E216A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:59:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFBB43D3F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:59:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [192.168.100.1]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4891B362E1; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:59:33 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:59:22 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez To: "E. J. Cerejo" Message-Id: <20050108155922.4e5fd7d6.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20050108145500.10971.qmail@web61006.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050108145500.10971.qmail@web61006.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.99-gtk2-20041024 (GTK+ 2.4.14; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__8_Jan_2005_15_59_22_+0100_PFC9TIA1=nOX9slX" cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Sound not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:59:42 -0000 --Signature=_Sat__8_Jan_2005_15_59_22_+0100_PFC9TIA1=nOX9slX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:55:00 -0300 (ART) "E. J. Cerejo" wrote: Hi, > I upgraded to FreeBSD 5.3 with a clean install and now I can't get the sound to work on my machine, I have Creative AudioPCI (ES1371, ES1373), this card under 4.x stable use to work fine with ^^^^^^ > device sound > device "snd_emu10k1" That's not the driver for the es137x, you need device "snd_es137x" Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez | lea gfx_lib(pc),a1 http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org | moveq #0,d0 PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 | move.l 4.w,a6 I reject all mail from hosts that use SORBS | jsr -552(a6) --Signature=_Sat__8_Jan_2005_15_59_22_+0100_PFC9TIA1=nOX9slX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3/VNnLctrNyFFPERAvVpAKDKX2j36lpght8WyuAHNh0nLusmbwCfTrwp FpKvCBRaGWgjm7zgKZf/EyI= =IH8q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__8_Jan_2005_15_59_22_+0100_PFC9TIA1=nOX9slX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 15:04:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E85016A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:04:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (fia148-72.dsl.hccnet.nl [62.251.72.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9838B43D3F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:04:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from colin@kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl) Received: from localhost (colin@localhost) by kenmore.kozy-kabin.nl (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j08F4Rg03846 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:04:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:04:26 +0100 From: "Colin J. Raven" To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: NFS mount issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:04:30 -0000 Hi all, I feel as if I've been grappling with this problem for months (I have, at least for 2 months AFAIK) I'm trying to mount my home directory on my office box (5.3-RELEASE) on my home box (5.3-RELEASE) and there is _no_ _way_ I have ever been able to make this work. /etc/exports on the NFS server is configured correctly (other exports to other boxen work fine) my entry reads: /usr/home/colin -mapall root 12.34.56.789 #home IP when - from the console as root - I do: mount -v office.nfs.server:/usr/home/colin /office-box I get rewarded with this message: [udp] office.nfs.server:/usr/home/colin: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Authentication error; why = Client credential too weak I'm coming in from the IP specified in /etc/exports on the server I'm doing it (as said above) as root I followeed the directions on: http://www.freebsddiary.org/nfs.php#mount to the letter I HUP'd mountd on the server just to be sure /var/log/messages on the server said (yes, you guessed it) Jan 8 15:50:37 boxen mountd[393]: mount request from 12.34.56.789 from unprivileged port How...HOW do I solve this? I've been wrestling with this one simple problem forever now, and no matter what I try I cannot get my homedir mounted. Help _really_ would be appreciated!! Regards & TIA, -Colin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 15:08:36 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01AD16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:08:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web61001.mail.yahoo.com (web61001.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04A4243D53 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:08:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edu07643@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 28770 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2005 15:08:35 -0000 Message-ID: <20050108150835.28768.qmail@web61001.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.86.20.47] by web61001.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 12:08:35 ART Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:08:35 -0300 (ART) From: "E. J. Cerejo" To: Miguel Mendez In-Reply-To: <20050108155922.4e5fd7d6.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Sound not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:08:36 -0000 Do I still need the device sound in the kernel file? Miguel Mendez wrote: On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:55:00 -0300 (ART) "E. J. Cerejo" wrote: Hi, > I upgraded to FreeBSD 5.3 with a clean install and now I can't get the sound to work on my machine, I have Creative AudioPCI (ES1371, ES1373), this card under 4.x stable use to work fine with ^^^^^^ > device sound > device "snd_emu10k1" That's not the driver for the es137x, you need device "snd_es137x" Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez | lea gfx_lib(pc),a1 http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org | moveq #0,d0 PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 | move.l 4.w,a6 I reject all mail from hosts that use SORBS | jsr -552(a6) > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature --------------------------------- Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador do Yahoo! agora. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 15:29:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7549816A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:29:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047B143D3F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:29:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from j65nko@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so601886wri for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:29:54 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=hgNtUqfe+dlVWlrnKpJJub3n/vj5T1rA/DIe2voKLW4Q0MZ6XCtmRwrHLD39uoEltvq9q5N+6Y/GLmA6r2SsjVejLSPcAAIhHzqApSbV8rbY2H6nLyXuGzExOhNC2/LBqWf1t5CFZmXqtmdk0IRcJFJSL72/GbMDqRXqMQxajVM= Received: by 10.54.23.65 with SMTP id 65mr347876wrw; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:29:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.37.19 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:29:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19861fba0501080729ccb39e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:29:53 +0100 From: J65nko BSD To: V Foulk In-Reply-To: <000901c4f52a$74466ae0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050107192851.GK3639@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub> <000901c4f52a$74466ae0$68bbbbc0@kewdaeahnhd04i> cc: Nathan Kinkade cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW and whois lookup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: J65nko BSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:29:55 -0000 On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:33:32 -0700, V Foulk wrote: [snip] > > # ipfw list > 65535 allow ip from any to any > > I did have more elaborate rule sets that worked great, with the > exception of the whois/hostname lookups. > > $ grep whois /etc/services whois 43/tcp nicname In pf the following rule would allow whois requests, initiated by clients behind the firewall pass out quick on xl0 proto tcp from any to any port = whois flags S/SA modulate state > [snip] > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 15:37:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16F616A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:37:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8E643D45 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:37:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from messmate@free.fr) Received: from eric.placeverte.home (lns-vlq-7-lil-82-254-193-66.adsl.proxad.net [82.254.193.66]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id C08A7C087 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:37:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:37:17 +0100 From: mess-mate To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050108153717.6864134a@eric.placeverte.home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: file roo large !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:37:25 -0000 Hi list, this is not new I think, but it is for me. I've searching the net without concrete results. So, I've copied from an ext3fs a backup file ( home.tar.bz2) in my home dir. So long it's ok. But now I've to cp or mv this file to a new ext3fs partition. And I've an error message " File too large" and stops the transfer. This file is about 24GB and 21GB are copied before the stop. This data is very important for me. Any help would be very appreciated. mess-mate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 15:43:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387D116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:43:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1948C43D2F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:43:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127ADFD01F; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:43:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41DFFFAE.8000107@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:43:42 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Colin J. Raven" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: NFS mount issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:43:47 -0000 Colin J. Raven wrote: > I'm trying to mount my home directory on my office box (5.3-RELEASE) on > my home box (5.3-RELEASE) and there is _no_ _way_ I have ever been > able to make this work. > > /etc/exports on the NFS server is configured correctly (other exports to > other boxen work fine) > my entry reads: > /usr/home/colin -mapall root 12.34.56.789 #home IP Output of `showmount -e` is more usefull, then we can see what is actually exported. NFS is very sensitive to errors in exports. You probably don't want to use "-mapall root", but rather "-maproot=root", see exports(5). Get rid of the comment, just to be sure. Second: What have you set in your rc.conf? Are all things up and running? > when - from the console as root - I do: > > mount -v office.nfs.server:/usr/home/colin /office-box You forgot to specify '-t nfs' or use 'mount_nfs' ? > I get rewarded with this message: > > [udp] office.nfs.server:/usr/home/colin: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: > Authentication error; why = Client credential too weak > > I'm coming in from the IP specified in /etc/exports on the server > I'm doing it (as said above) as root > I followeed the directions on: > http://www.freebsddiary.org/nfs.php#mount to the letter That article is from 1998, take a look in the handbook. And if you scrool further down, it has been updated, 18 june 2004, quote: Today I encounted this error for the first time. I was compiling a kernel on my fast box and while I was waiting I set up the slow box. I did this: $ mount polo:/usr/src /usr/src polo:/usr/src: RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Authentication error; why = Client credential too weak That confused me. I checked /var/log/messageson the NFS server: mountd[95]: mount request from 10.0.0.20 from unprivileged port Ahhh! I wasn't root when I tried to mount! I su'd to root, and all was well. quote-end. > How...HOW do I solve this? I've been wrestling with this one simple > problem forever now, and no matter what I try I cannot get my homedir > mounted. > > Help _really_ would be appreciated!! I think it would help following an updated guide :-), I have had no problem exporting my /home. And, then post relevant settings from rc.conf, exports, `showmount -e` etc. Cheers, Erik PS: I note you are nfs-exporting across the internet, are you sure that is a good idea? Consider tunneling. -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 15:51:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D551116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:51:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF7FE43D48 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 20134 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2005 15:50:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.48]) ([pbs]775067@[213.54.18.195]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Jan 2005 15:50:58 -0000 From: Fabian Keil To: Nikolas Britton Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:40:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <4d0730560501010721556089dc@mail.gmail.com> <200501021416.44109.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> <41D7FB93.2020804@nbritton.org> In-Reply-To: <41D7FB93.2020804@nbritton.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501081640.24375.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Writing speed impact on writing quality (was: Please help: burncd errors) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:51:00 -0000 On Sunday 02 January 2005 14:48, Nikolas Britton wrote: > Fabian Keil wrote: >=20 > > > >"Low speed =3D=3D better quality" is a myth > > =20 > > > why so? Because writing quality is affected by several factors, not just speed. Most of the time, bad writing quality is a sign of missing compatibility between drive and media. There might be some cases where a drive produces better quality at lower writing speed, but if it does, the firmware is crap and OPC (optimum power calibration) isn't working. With low quality firmware you can have the different affect as well, so this doesn't mean anything. While comparing the writing quality of a LiteOn LTR-48125W and a Plextor PlexWriter Premium, I did some C1-Scans. I used different media and writing speed. The results show, that as long as you stick with good media, the writing quality is not affected by the writing speed. Have a look at and . The pages are in German, but as they aren't commented yet, it shouldn't matter ;-). "Rohling" means "label of the media", "Hersteller" means "manufacturer of the media", "Freigabe" is how fast you should burn the media at maximum if you listen to it's label, "Gew=E4hlt" is the speed I have chosen, in the "Bild" column you find links to the graphical results. The rest of the table head allready is in English. HTH =46abian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 15:59:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3924B16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:59:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gawab.com (www.gawab.com [204.97.230.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1D8343D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:59:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jadukor@gawab.com) Received: (qmail 32097 invoked by uid 1004); 8 Jan 2005 15:58:24 -0000 Message-ID: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> Received: from 202.84.37.114 by www.gawab.com with HTTP; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:58:24 GMT From: "Emon" To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:58:24 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [202.84.37.114] Subject: startx problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:59:59 -0000 Hello everyone I am a newbie. I have just Installed FreeBSD 5.3 and I am trying to get X started. But after typing "Xorg -configure" (I learned this from the Hand-Book) I got the following error ************************** Fatal server error: xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O *************************** I have no clue as to what that means I am also pasting the Xorg.0.log file. Thanks in advance Jadukor *********************** Release Date: 18 December 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.7 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 5.3 i386 [ELF] Current Operating System: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Build Date: 16 October 2004 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sat Jan 8 21:03:22 2005 (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 X.Org Video Driver: 0.7 X.Org XInput driver : 0.4 X.Org Server Extension : 0.2 X.Org Font Renderer : 0.4 (II) Loader running on freebsd (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a (II) Module bitmap: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 6.7.0, module version = 1.0.0 Module class: X.Org Font Renderer ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.4 (II) Loading font Bitmap (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a (II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 6.7.0, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.7 (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 2.0) (--) using VT number 9 Fatal server error: xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.X.Org for help. Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information. ***************************8 --------------------------------------------- Free POP3 Email from www.Gawab.com Sign up NOW and get your account @gawab.com!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 16:04:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB6116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:04:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web-17.seeweb.it (web-17.seeweb.it [212.25.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A941043D2F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:04:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matteo@tilde.it) Received: from [80.181.113.223] (host223-113.pool80181.interbusiness.it [80.181.113.223]) by web-17.seeweb.it (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id j08FlpK03707; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:47:52 +0100 Message-ID: <41E01280.90508@tilde.it> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:04:00 +0000 From: Matteo Santori User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041204) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Emon References: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> In-Reply-To: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startx problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:04:24 -0000 It's strange cause it should be in the kernel GENERIC on 5.3 Anyway, just add: dev io in you kernelconfig and it will work. If you don't know how to compile the kernel, check the handbook. Greets, matteo, italy Emon wrote: >Hello everyone > >I am a newbie. I have just Installed FreeBSD 5.3 and I am >trying to get X started. But after typing "Xorg -configure" (I >learned this from the Hand-Book) I got the following error > >************************** >Fatal server error: > >xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O >*************************** > >I have no clue as to what that means > >I am also pasting the Xorg.0.log file. > >Thanks in advance >Jadukor > >*********************** > >Release Date: 18 December 2003 > >X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.7 > >Build Operating System: FreeBSD 5.3 i386 [ELF] > >Current Operating System: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD >5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 > root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >i386 > >Build Date: 16 October 2004 > > Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org > > to make sure that you have the latest version. > >Module Loader present > >Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default >setting, > > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > >(==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sat Jan 8 21:03:22 >2005 > >(II) Module ABI versions: > > X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 > > X.Org Video Driver: 0.7 > > X.Org XInput driver : 0.4 > > X.Org Server Extension : 0.2 > > X.Org Font Renderer : 0.4 > >(II) Loader running on freebsd > >(II) LoadModule: "bitmap" > >(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a > >(II) Module bitmap: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > > compiled for 6.7.0, module version = 1.0.0 > > Module class: X.Org Font Renderer > > ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.4 > >(II) Loading font Bitmap > >(II) LoadModule: "pcidata" > >(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a > >(II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > > compiled for 6.7.0, module version = 1.0.0 > > ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.7 > >(--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 2.0) > >(--) using VT number 9 > > > >Fatal server error: > >xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O > > >Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support > > at http://wiki.X.Org > > for help. > >Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for >additional information. >***************************8 > >--------------------------------------------- >Free POP3 Email from www.Gawab.com >Sign up NOW and get your account @gawab.com!! >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 16:10:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5B616A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:10:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.speakeasy.net (mail3.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6E143D1F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20549 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2005 16:10:04 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Jan 2005 16:10:04 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7F87169; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:10:03 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Emon" References: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Jan 2005 11:10:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> Message-ID: <444qhr6gx0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: startx problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:10:05 -0000 "Emon" writes: > Hello everyone > > I am a newbie. I have just Installed FreeBSD 5.3 and I am > trying to get X started. But after typing "Xorg -configure" (I > learned this from the Hand-Book) I got the following error > > ************************** > Fatal server error: > > xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O Did you try doing that as root? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 16:14:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9AD16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:14:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.terralink.de (mail.tlink.de [217.9.16.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346BD43D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:14:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de (daniel-s-haischt.biz [84.252.66.2]) by mail.terralink.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD85FBD583; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:14:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3697517DB9; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:14:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.abyssworld.de ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 87241-08; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:14:35 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: none (smtp.abyssworld.de: 192.168.1.6 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of daniel.stefan.haischt.name) client-ip=192.168.1.6; envelope-from=me@daniel.stefan.haischt.name; helo=[192.168.120.239]; Received: from [192.168.120.239] (smtp.abyssworld.de [192.168.1.6]) by smtp.abyssworld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339A6176A6; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:14:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41E006E7.6030509@daniel.stefan.haischt.name> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:14:31 +0100 From: "Daniel S. Haischt" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matteo Santori References: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> <41E01280.90508@tilde.it> In-Reply-To: <41E01280.90508@tilde.it> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Processed-By: GNU Anubis v4.0 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at abyssworld.de cc: Emon cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startx problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:14:47 -0000 you should add this to your kernel configuration file if you are required to build a custom kernel: device io # I/O device #^^^^^^ Matteo Santori schrieb: > It's strange cause it should be in the kernel GENERIC on 5.3 > > Anyway, just add: > > dev io > > in you kernelconfig and it will work. > If you don't know how to compile the kernel, check the handbook. > Greets, > > matteo, italy > > > > Emon wrote: > >> Hello everyone >> >> I am a newbie. I have just Installed FreeBSD 5.3 and I am >> trying to get X started. But after typing "Xorg -configure" (I >> learned this from the Hand-Book) I got the following error >> ************************** >> Fatal server error: >> >> xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O >> *************************** >> >> I have no clue as to what that means >> >> I am also pasting the Xorg.0.log file. >> >> Thanks in advance >> Jadukor >> >> *********************** >> >> Release Date: 18 December 2003 >> >> X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.7 >> >> Build Operating System: FreeBSD 5.3 i386 [ELF] >> Current Operating System: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD >> 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 >> root@harlow.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> i386 >> >> Build Date: 16 October 2004 >> >> Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org >> >> to make sure that you have the latest version. >> >> Module Loader present >> >> Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default >> setting, >> >> (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, >> >> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. >> >> (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sat Jan 8 21:03:22 >> 2005 >> >> (II) Module ABI versions: >> >> X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.2 >> >> X.Org Video Driver: 0.7 >> >> X.Org XInput driver : 0.4 >> >> X.Org Server Extension : 0.2 >> >> X.Org Font Renderer : 0.4 >> >> (II) Loader running on freebsd >> >> (II) LoadModule: "bitmap" >> >> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a >> >> (II) Module bitmap: vendor="X.Org Foundation" >> >> compiled for 6.7.0, module version = 1.0.0 >> >> Module class: X.Org Font Renderer >> >> ABI class: X.Org Font Renderer, version 0.4 >> >> (II) Loading font Bitmap >> >> (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" >> >> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a >> >> (II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation" >> >> compiled for 6.7.0, module version = 1.0.0 >> >> ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 0.7 >> >> (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 2.0) >> >> (--) using VT number 9 >> >> >> >> Fatal server error: >> >> xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O >> >> >> Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support >> at http://wiki.X.Org >> >> for help. >> Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for >> additional information. >> ***************************8 >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> Free POP3 Email from www.Gawab.com Sign up NOW and get your account >> @gawab.com!! >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > !DSPAM:41e004a8282374745749934! > > -- Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With kind regards Daniel S. Haischt Wan't a complete signature??? Type at a shell prompt: $ > finger -l haischt@daniel.stefan.haischt.name From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 16:20:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492B716A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:20:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from top.daemonsecurity.com (FW-182-254.go.retevision.es [62.174.254.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE2343D45 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:20:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [192.168.0.32] (charm.daemonsecurity.com [192.168.0.32]) by top.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4781FD01F; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:20:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41E00859.1020301@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:20:41 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041114 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, da, it, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Emon References: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> In-Reply-To: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: startx problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:20:46 -0000 Emon wrote: > I am a newbie. I have just Installed FreeBSD 5.3 and I am > trying to get X started. But after typing "Xorg -configure" (I > learned this from the Hand-Book) I got the following error X should work out of the box from a standard installation - no need to recompile the kernel. The generic kernel is configured with 'device io' if not, try 'kldload io' as root. Check also that you have devfs mounted, if not run '/etc/rc.d/devfs start' Hope this helps. Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 16:34:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E5516A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:34:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rogers.com (CPE00095bf5ff21-CM000f9f578d7a.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [70.24.145.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C390143D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:34:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gbell72@gardnerbell.ca) Received: from gardnerbell.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rogers.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j08GVVtS059559; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:31:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gbell72@gardnerbell.ca) Received: (from gbell72@localhost) by gardnerbell.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j08GVMBh059558; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:31:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gbell72) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:31:22 -0500 From: Gardner Bell To: Emon Message-ID: <20050108163122.GA59543@gardnerbell.ca> Mail-Followup-To: Emon , FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org References: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050108155824.32095.qmail@gawab.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startx problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:34:11 -0000 On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 03:58:24PM +0000 Emon wrote: > > Hello everyone > > I am a newbie. I have just Installed FreeBSD 5.3 and I am > trying to get X started. But after typing "Xorg -configure" (I > learned this from the Hand-Book) I got the following error > > ************************** > Fatal server error: > > xf86EnableIO: Failed to open /dev/io for extended I/O > *************************** Do you have a secure kernel level set in /etc/rc.conf? If so I think you will have to lower it. I tried running X once with securelevel 1 and got the same error. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:04:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412FF16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:04:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F0743D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:04:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so30193wri for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:04:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=BUBCPEEIv6yX8sZqxUcvV9hLW6jLbX7AW/gw5zgasUxwnKZS61sw4mjQ3Wzv5hqMsBjIyefqtuXZtOYWCbI+48EpbU3U7WvKzy7lY1eB9cdC0nlPUB+OapXMN4dahLBCSA+0zImfUOybTu96Ns7NtjQ+DPTSc1Umf5lHeQXc1Nw= Received: by 10.54.43.75 with SMTP id q75mr84891wrq; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:04:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:04:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:04:06 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: "E. J. Cerejo" In-Reply-To: <20050108150835.28768.qmail@web61001.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050108155922.4e5fd7d6.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20050108150835.28768.qmail@web61001.mail.yahoo.com> cc: Questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD Sound not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:04:07 -0000 > Miguel Mendez wrote: > On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:55:00 -0300 (ART) > "E. J. Cerejo" wrote: > > Hi, > > > I upgraded to FreeBSD 5.3 with a clean install and now I can't get the sound to work on my machine, I have Creative AudioPCI (ES1371, ES1373), this card under 4.x stable use to work fine with > ^^^^^^ > > device sound > > device "snd_emu10k1" > > That's not the driver for the es137x, you need > > device "snd_es137x" > >> Do I still need the device sound in the kernel file? >From the FreeBSD Handbook, 7.2 Setting Up the Sound Card: "The first thing to do is adding the generic audio driver sound(4) to the kernel, for that you will need to add the following line to the kernel configuration file: device sound [snip] Then we have to add the support for our sound card." Which is where 'device snd_es137x' comes in, so yes, you do still need to add that line to your kernel conf _if_ you want sound support built in to the kernel. If not, you can add the appropriate line to /boot/loader.conf to load the module at boot time. -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:04:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F12016A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:04:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from enterprise.thenetnow.com (enterprise.thenetnow.com [65.39.193.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA2243D1F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:04:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from GRANT (hpeel.ody.ca [216.240.12.2])j08H4n368849 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:04:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Message-ID: <00b501c4f5a3$e1ebae10$6401a8c0@GRANT> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:02:46 -0500 Organization: The Net Now MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: DNS - FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:04:54 -0000 Hi all, I am sending this question to this list only thinking FreeBSD users may be the best source of info regarding networking on FreeBSD. I understand if many think I would be better serverd sending to some Bind or DNS list... That having been said .... I have: - one managed switch, the Gigabyte port is connected to our upstream provider; - 2 VLANS configured (LAN and WAN): - The VLANs are configured to allow access to LAN from LAN or to WAN from WAN only. - 5 FreeBSD boxes connected to this switch with s NICS each: - 1 NIC on each is the LAN NIC; - This LAN scheme is using 192.168.0.1/24 - The hosts are configured as 192.168.0.1,2,3,4,5,6; (the switch being #6). - 1 NIC on each is the WAN NIC. - Many different IP addresses (hosting etc); - 2 of the hosts are fully setup authoritive nameservers for mydomain.com and several hundred other domains. My questions revolve around DNS in general, as related to the above setup. 1.) The default 'make-localhost' script (originally ran before I had a managed switch and only 2 hosts on the network). Created the zone that looks as such: file /etc/namedb/192.168.1 $TTL 3600 @ IN SOA thishost.mydomain.com. root.thishost.mydomain.com. ( 20020527 ; Serial 3600 ; Refresh 900 ; Retry 3600000 ; Expire 3600 ) ; Minimum IN NS thishost.mydomain.com. 1 IN PTR localhost.mydomain.com. For whatever reason, I can't seem to get my head around what this file is for, and if (considering the 192.168.0.1/24 scheme I am using), if it is configured right. Q Any thoughts? Q Should I have a similar file on each of the other hosts? In my resolv.conf files on each host, I am using lines like: nameserver 192.168.0.2 nameserver 192.168.0.1 Q Are there any downsides to using this scheme? (the thought here was to keep the lookups from ns1 and ns2 from going through my providers router, therefor causing me to pay for bandwidth I could otherwise keep local). I have ipfw firewalls setup on all the hosts. I have rules allowing all outgoing traffic from all hosts, and rules to allow incomming traffic to port 53 UDP and TCP. Q Does there need to be other ports / protocols passed for the DNS to work correctly? Q Would there be any benifit to setting up a caching server on each of the three (Non nameserver) hosts? TIA, -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:14:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3251516A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:14:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE81043D1D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:14:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j08HEQ1l050595; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:14:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost)j08HEPo7050592; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:14:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:14:25 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: Joe Altman In-Reply-To: <20050108055611.GA27077@panix.com> Message-ID: <20050108115902.S50168@pemaquid.safeport.com> References: <20050106232123.AC3BA16A4D2@hub.freebsd.org> <20050108055611.GA27077@panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Ronny Fischer Subject: Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:14:29 -0000 Thanks Joe I will try to upgrade. My experience was the same, in that the problem tracked X (both projects) across several levels of 4.x and 5.x. The vesa drive works okay, but I miss the larger screen and better font rendering. On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Joe Altman wrote: > Doug, Ronny... > > I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28, > 2004 using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have > a default depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using > the ati driver. > > Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my > experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the > most recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on > December 28th. > > Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in > September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what > is above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest > source for xorg and the chip in question. > > HTH, best regards, > > Joe > _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:18:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1993316A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:18:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D8143D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:18:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from [10.20.30.249] (dsl2-63-249-109-3.cruzio.com [63.249.109.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j08HIDPL077460; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:18:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20050107210046.2145a571.BSD-Mail@nyc.rr.com> References: <20050107210046.2145a571.BSD-Mail@nyc.rr.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:18:14 -0800 To: John Wilson From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting USB2 on FreeBSD 5.3? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:18:19 -0000 At 9:00 PM -0500 1/7/05, John Wilson wrote: >On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:32:31 -0800 >Paul Hoffman wrote: >[...] >> da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device >> da0: 1.000MB/s transfers >[...] > >For what it's worth, I too am using ehci with a USB2 HD based MP3 player, and >it is being reported similarly as well in regard to the 1.000MB/s transfer >rate. However, according to `systat -vmstat`, I am seeing transfers in the >area of 8MB/s. In regard to stability, I've had no issues at all with it. > >I'm sure this doesn't help at all. ;p Actually, it helps some. I am seeing similar results (well, 7.1 MB/s), so this is a bit heartening. But it doesn't explain why we're not seeing the 50 MB/s we're supposed to be seeing. Anyone else have any clues? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:29:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1935116A4F0 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:29:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp16.wxs.nl (smtp16.wxs.nl [195.121.6.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D76043D1D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:29:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marco@beishuizen.info) Received: from yokozuna.lan (ipd50a233c.speed.planet.nl [213.10.35.60]) by smtp16.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IA0000YJDXR7N@smtp16.wxs.nl> for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:29:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:29:51 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen Sender: marco@yokozuna.lan To: FreeBSD questions mailing list Message-id: <20050108182413.M1272@yokozuna.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT FreeBSD: Homepage: Subject: portupgrade failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:29:54 -0000 Hi, I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the following error: root@yokozuna># portupgrade firefox Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..^Cfailed to generate INDEX! index generation error /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:482:in `open_db': database file error (PortsDB::DBError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:634:in `port' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:822:in `all_depends_list' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:915:in `tsort_build' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `tsort_build' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:929:in `sort_build' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:933:in `sort_build!' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:674:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `initialize' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `new' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1845 Does anyone know what the problem is? Thanks, Marco -- U: There's a U -- a Unicorn! Run right up and rub its horn. Look at all those points you're losing! UMBER HULKS are so confusing. -- The Roguelet's ABC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:36:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A3616A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:36:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from seed.net.tw (sn14.seed.net.tw [139.175.54.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B0743D31 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:36:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailinglist@ms94.url.com.tw) Received: from [221.169.112.158] (port=57049 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by seed.net.tw with esmtp (Seednet 4.23:1) id 1CnKVg-000Fmq-0s for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 01:36:20 +0800 Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 01:36:24 +0800 From: Der To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20050109013552.CB71.MAILINGLIST@ms94.url.com.tw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.12.01 [en] Subject: I can't get anything from mailing list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:36:22 -0000 I was join this list yestoday, and I can't get anything from mailing list. Is it due to time zone ?? Or what?? --- Der From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:44:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED4C16A4CF for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:44:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8872543D4C for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:44:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martes.wigglesworth@earthlink.net) Received: from [83.170.20.46] (helo=[192.168.1.55]) (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CnKdc-00032k-Jz for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 12:44:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=test1; d=earthlink.net; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Content-Type:Organization:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=tw9n/Sc/Da/obhO/GkZ3Q9YBFmtGFLRAI8LmabcYieqLs3knCWSdghkgY8xGE5zF; From: Martes Wigglesworth To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Wiggtekmicro Corporation Message-Id: <1105206300.683.368.camel@Mobile1.276NET> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:45:00 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 532caf459ba90ce6996df0496707a79d9bea09fe345ed53d9ef193a6bfc3dd48d9353cf5fae93fb1d009479e74b51a15396bf6a0aafa7dc0350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 83.170.20.46 Subject: In reference to the "Cheap NAS" inquiry.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: martes.wigglesworth@earthlink.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:44:35 -0000 I am researching the viability of constructing a Network Access Server using FreeBSD, and I came across your post(s) from December 2004. What were you using the acronyme, "NAS," to describe? You seemed to be describing a network storage appliance, however, I never got a clear description of what you were using the term for. The context seemed to be such that you would have to have been describing the network storage appliance. Were you talking about a "Network Access Server" or a "Network Application Server?" If anyone is familiar with the topics of building Network Access Servers with FreeBSD, I would appreciate any input. -- Respectfully, M.G.W. System: PCChips K7SOM MB AMD K7 Pro 1800 256MB RAM 40GB HD 10/100 NIC FreeBSD-5.2.1-RELEASE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 17:51:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FE916A4CF for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:51:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thingy.apana.org.au (adsl-175.isp.net.au [202.1.119.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788CB43D1D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:51:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from fun by thingy.apana.org.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CnKkC-0007aS-00; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 04:51:20 +1100 Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 04:51:20 +1100 To: Martes Wigglesworth Message-ID: <20050108175119.GG21075@thingy.apana.org.au> References: <1105206300.683.368.camel@Mobile1.276NET> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1105206300.683.368.camel@Mobile1.276NET> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: David Gerard cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: In reference to the "Cheap NAS" inquiry.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:51:27 -0000 Martes Wigglesworth (martes.wigglesworth@earthlink.net) [050109 04:44]: > I am researching the viability of constructing a Network Access Server > using FreeBSD, and I came across your post(s) from December 2004. What > were you using the acronyme, "NAS," to describe? You seemed to be > describing a network storage appliance, however, I never got a clear > description of what you were using the term for. The context seemed to > be such that you would have to have been describing the network storage > appliance. Were you talking about a "Network Access Server" or a > "Network Application Server?" If anyone is familiar with the topics of > building Network Access Servers with FreeBSD, I would appreciate any > input. Network Attached Storage - a server doing nothing but serving files. NetApp in particular specialise in very good ones. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAS - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 18:06:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65B516A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:06:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D8743D49 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:06:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 58so33820wri for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:06:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=bvoiYrkiN8xeQzinprSrc0XPiQWvV54NLRoah38AK8xrXsyD4EWm/Ium6Qlfkwgy49EzmRa03iQVVX1mCzGU2jc098jbyokD0zpE+znQ83a2lFUgZIAylfXKB6d8dgQqnccjG6TORPqATMQhchBMyByGCwHTB6VBJymfQ5hTem8= Received: by 10.54.3.32 with SMTP id 32mr275593wrc; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:06:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.33 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 10:06:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:06:01 -0600 From: Joshua Lokken To: Marco Beishuizen In-Reply-To: <20050108182413.M1272@yokozuna.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050108182413.M1272@yokozuna.lan> cc: FreeBSD questions mailing list Subject: Re: portupgrade failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joshua Lokken List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:06:03 -0000 On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:29:51 +0100 (CET), Marco Beishuizen wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the > following error: > > root@yokozuna># portupgrade firefox > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..^Cfailed to generate INDEX! > index generation error > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:482:in `open_db': database file error (PortsDB::DBError) > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:634:in `port' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:822:in `all_depends_list' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:915:in `tsort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `tsort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:929:in `sort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:933:in `sort_build!' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:674:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `initialize' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `new' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1845 > > Does anyone know what the problem is? You may be able to make this problem go away by doing: # cd /usr/ports # make fetchindex -- Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 18:10:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C22C16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from newman.alt-network.com (wsip-68-110-223-100.ks.ok.cox.net [68.110.223.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC7043D31 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:10:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from justin@alt-network.com) Received: from [192.168.0.10] ([192.168.0.10])j08I9xN6045867 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:09:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from justin@alt-network.com) From: "Justin L. Boss" Organization: Alt Network To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:10:00 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501081210.00410.justin@alt-network.com> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on newman.alt-network.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/533/Sat Oct 16 20:09:44 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on newman.alt-network.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: poptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:10:02 -0000 Has anyone had any success with poptop. I'm able to get a windows client to connect but can not see the privet network at all. Here are my config file ### /usr/local/etc/pptpd.conf option /etc/ppp/options.pptp debug bcrelay dc1 localip 172.19.100.100 remoteip 172.19.100.200-254 ### /etc/ppp/options.pptp lock debug name host.domain.com nobsdcomp proxyarp ms-wins 172.19.100.1 ms-dns 172.19.100.1 auth noipdefault refuse-pap require-chap ### ifconfig out put ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 ppp1: flags=8051 mtu 1500 inet 172.19.100.100 --> 172.19.100.200 netmask 0xffffff00 tun0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 -------------------------------------- The client is able to ping the 172.19.100.200 but nothing further. PPP adapter Newman: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : WAN (PPP/SLIP) Interface Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-53-45-00-00-00 DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.19.100.200 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.255 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 172.19.100.200 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.19.100.1 172.19.100.1 Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 172.19.100.1 Secondary WINS Server . . . . . . : 172.19.100.1 Thanks for your help Justin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 18:37:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B0916A4CE; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:37:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0063843D3F; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:37:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) id j08IbMDJ032390; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:37:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:37:21 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20050108183721.GB10306@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20050108000041.GA99385@dan.emsphone.com> <20050108004735.C89F748E0A8@mail.wavebandwireless.com> <20050108062845.GA10306@dan.emsphone.com> <41DFF232.60007@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DFF232.60007@freebsd.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Jeff Tollison Subject: Re: Sony autoloader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:37:24 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 08), Scott Long said: > Dan Nelson wrote: > >In the last episode (Jan 07), Jeff Tollison said: > >>pciconf -lv for the slot says: > >> > >>none2@pci1:7:0: class=0x010000 card=0x80101191 chip=0x80101191 rev=0x01 > >>hdr=0x00 > >> vendor = 'Acard Technology Corp' > >> device = 'ATP870 Ultra Wide SCSI Contoller (AEC6712UW)' > >> class = mass storage > >> subclass = SCSI > > > >Unfortunately, I don't think there are any FreeBSD drivers for Acard > >controllers. There are about 3 requests a year asking about Acard > >support, so unless one of them volunteers to write a driver, you may > >be better off getting a cheap Adaptec or Symbios card. > > There looks to be a linux driver, so writing one for FreeBSD shouldn't > be impossible. Where does one get one of these cards? Daniel O'Connor might have one, since back in 2000 he claimed to have specs for a card: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.001214210618.doconnor@gsoft.com.au -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 18:50:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4CA16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:50:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.itknowledge.ch (static-195-073.catv.glattnet.ch [80.242.195.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115C443D4C for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:50:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from black@black.ch) Received: from mail.itknowledge.ch (Not Verified[10.0.1.100]) by smtp.itknowledge.ch with NetIQ MailMarshal (v6,0,3,8) id ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:49:53 +0100 Received: from [172.31.150.222] ([217.162.70.152]) by mail.itknowledge.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:51:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20050108115902.S50168@pemaquid.safeport.com> References: <20050106232123.AC3BA16A4D2@hub.freebsd.org> <20050108055611.GA27077@panix.com> <20050108115902.S50168@pemaquid.safeport.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=fixed Message-Id: <37FFE2B2-61A6-11D9-ADC7-000A95C6157C@fischerman.ch> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ronny Fischer Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:50:51 +0100 To: doug@safeport.com X-Pgp-Rfc2646-Fix: 1 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2005 18:51:24.0846 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D8C34E0:01C4F5B3] cc: Joe Altman cc: Ronny Fischer cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATi and Xorg Troubles in FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:50:30 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Doug, hi Joe Thanx a lot for your answer's ;.-) The problem on my Laptop is that strange resolution of 1024x480 which is not proper working with the vesa driver. I will also try to upgarde my Xorg and report to you if it is working or not. Thanx again, have a nice weekend, HAVE FUN and with my best regards Ronny Am 08.01.2005 um 18:14 schrieb doug@safeport.com: Thanks Joe I will try to upgrade. My experience was the same, in that the problem tracked X (both projects) across several levels of 4.x and 5.x. The vesa drive works okay, but I miss the larger screen and better font rendering. On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Joe Altman wrote: > Doug, Ronny... > > I'm running 4.11 with xorg 6.8.1, built from source on December 28, > 2004 using a Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x on an IBM ThinkPad A20m. I have > a default depth of 24 bits, and a resolution of 1024x768. I am using > the ati driver. > > Ronny: I see that the query is for 5.3, but I thought that perhaps my > experience would indicate that the ATI chip seems to work fine w/ the > most recent version of xorg; or rather, the source as it existed on > December 28th. > > Doug: I remember that you and I encountered the same issue, back in > September or thereabouts, WRT the ATI chip? I'm happy to report what > is above: it seems to be safe to use the ati driver w/ the newest > source for xorg and the chip in question. > > HTH, best regards, > > Joe > _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQeArk8Af475eQe77EQI9OwCg0NTvIgno9uS14wIt68+h6j8923MAoMfT EWWT7AQqSdCr8M/x78NkozOR =sLMj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ######################################################################## This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by NetIQ MailMarshal, the e-mail content security solution ######################################################################## From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 18:57:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3256516A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:57:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net (ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net [166.102.165.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C87B43D49 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:57:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trey@fastmail.fm) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [69.40.74.131]) by ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net with ESMTP <20050108185716.VKWQ10027.ispmxmta05-srv.alltel.net@[192.168.0.2]> for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:57:16 -0600 From: Trey Sizemore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:59:00 -0500 Message-Id: <1105210740.1193.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Good image editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:57:19 -0000 I'm looking for a good image editor / photo album program like Pixie Plus or digikam (both of which I installed on 5.3 but are marked as broken for 4.x and crash on my box when I try to do things like rotate pictures). I want to be able to see the photos and do minor tweaks like rotate (with EXIF data??, rename, etc.). The programs I mentioned previously are great when they work, but... Thanks for any suggestions. -- Cheers, Trey --- The world is full of obvious things which nobody by any chance ever observes. -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle 1:54PM up 18:53, 0 users, load averages: 0.40, 0.25, 0.10 FreeBSD salamander.thesizemores.net 5.3-STABLE i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 19:03:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BDA16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:03:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53FA43D2D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:03:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from frambozen (frambozen [192.168.1.9]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA91551; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:03:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:03:46 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: Trey Sizemore In-Reply-To: <1105210740.1193.6.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <20050108135853.G606@frambozen.monochrome.org> References: <1105210740.1193.6.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Good image editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:03:44 -0000 On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Trey Sizemore wrote: > I'm looking for a good image editor / photo album program [snip] ... > I want to be able to see the photos and do minor tweaks like rotate For home digital camera stuff, I use graphics/xv. It's not new or fancy, but it's pretty easy to use and does what I need. Xv is not able to make "photo albums" (i.e. contact sheets or thumbnails?) as far as I know, but it works great for viewing, cropping and rotating, as well as tweaking color balance, black level, gamma, that sort of thing. It also lets you change file formats (JPEG, PNG, many more), image resolution and color depth. HTH. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 19:40:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468A916A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:40:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC3743D4C for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:40:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5C1BE51266; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:40:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:40:12 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Marco Beishuizen Message-ID: <20050108194012.GA68567@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050108182413.M1272@yokozuna.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050108182413.M1272@yokozuna.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: FreeBSD questions mailing list Subject: Re: portupgrade failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:40:13 -0000 --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:29:51PM +0100, Marco Beishuizen wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the=20 > following error: >=20 > root@yokozuna># portupgrade firefox > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..^Cfailed= =20 > to generate INDEX! > index generation error > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:482:in `open_db': database= =20 > file error (PortsDB::DBError) > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:634:in `port' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:822:in=20 > `all_depends_list' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:915:in `tsort_bui= ld' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `tsort_bui= ld' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:929:in `sort_buil= d' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:933:in `sort_buil= d!' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:674:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `initialize' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `new' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1845 >=20 > Does anyone know what the problem is? /usr/ports/UPDATING Kris --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB4DccWry0BWjoQKURAsrHAJ9hbChi28AlF8IWXOXu0giOklWxSQCcC7nR QhQnr/8I71x8SC3Tm7KsHfs= =sXtW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 20:09:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B6316A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:09:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EC843D1F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:09:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <200501082009530160022ihne>; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:09:53 +0000 Message-ID: <41E03DEC.4050309@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:09:16 -0500 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marco Beishuizen References: <20050108182413.M1272@yokozuna.lan> In-Reply-To: <20050108182413.M1272@yokozuna.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD questions mailing list Subject: Re: portupgrade failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:09:54 -0000 Marco Beishuizen wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the > following error: > > root@yokozuna># portupgrade firefox > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please > wait..^Cfailed to generate INDEX! > index generation error > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:482:in `open_db': database > file error (PortsDB::DBError) > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:634:in `port' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:822:in > `all_depends_list' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:915:in > `tsort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `each' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in > `tsort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:929:in `sort_build' > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:933:in > `sort_build!' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:674:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `initialize' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `new' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `main' > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1845 > > Does anyone know what the problem is? > > Thanks, > > Marco I had that problem and deleted and reinstalled ruby cured it for me. Sean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 20:11:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2836516A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:11:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from natco3.natcotech.com (natco3.natcotech.com [205.167.142.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB18043D49 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:11:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smartweb@leadhill.net) Received: from ibm.nlcc.us (lhr5-dial-12-28-24-42.natcotech.com [12.28.24.42]) by natco3.natcotech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFA66319B for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:11:11 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 76092 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2005 20:11:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (billy@192.168.0.2) by ibm.nlcc.us with SMTP; 8 Jan 2005 20:11:11 -0000 Message-ID: <41E03E5E.9020001@leadhill.net> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:11:10 -0600 From: Billy Newsom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Reboot fails: 5 beeps and a freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:11:13 -0000 My issue: Why does FreeBSD 5.3 not reboot? It basically locks up when I perform a reboot. The same thing happens if I halt and then press any key to reboot. Here's sort of what I see on the local terminal (some snips): Uptime: blah.... Rebooting... cpu_reset called on CPU#0 cpu_reset: Stopping other CPUs ...and that's all I ever see. But while this is being printed to the screen, I get five beeps. I don't remember that many beeps in FreeBSD 4.x. BEEP, beep beep beep, BEEP I don't know how long I've waited for the system to reboot, but so far it hasn't. The system is a dual-processor Pentium Pro with an APM BIOS and no ACPI. This machine rebooted fine when it ran FreeBSD 4.7. Has the code changed for the cpu_reset function recently that would cause this regression? Thanks, Billy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 20:30:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B656C16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:30:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp17.wxs.nl (smtp17.wxs.nl [195.121.6.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1938D43D39 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:30:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marco@beishuizen.info) Received: from yokozuna.lan (ipd50a233c.speed.planet.nl [213.10.35.60]) by smtp17.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IA000KQAMAOW4@smtp17.wxs.nl> for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:30:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:30:24 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen In-reply-to: Sender: marco@yokozuna.lan To: Joshua Lokken Message-id: <20050108212739.F800@yokozuna.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT FreeBSD: Homepage: References: <20050108182413.M1272@yokozuna.lan> cc: FreeBSD questions mailing list Subject: Re: portupgrade failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:30:26 -0000 On stardate Sat, 8 Jan 2005, the wise Joshua Lokken entered: > You may be able to make this problem go away by doing: > > # cd /usr/ports > # make fetchindex Yes, this did the trick. I should have read /usr/ports/UPDATING though, because the answer was in it... Thanks for the answers. Marco -- Minnie Mouse is a slow maze learner. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 21:21:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774D116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:21:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427E943D45 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:21:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005010821215101400gh0oae>; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:21:51 +0000 Message-ID: <41E04ECA.80508@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:21:14 -0500 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Makefile correction? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:21:52 -0000 Hello All, I am trying to install gnuchess but when I start the build process it errors out as follows. ---------------------------------------- tardis# make install clean ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Found saved configuration for gnuchess-5.07 ===> Extracting for gnuchess-5.07 => Checksum OK for book_1.01.pgn.gz. /usr/ports/distfiles//gnuchess-5.07.tar.gz: No such file or directory tar: Error opening archive: Empty input file: Inappropriate file type or format *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/games/gnuchess. ---------------------------------------- From what I make of this it looks like there is an extra / in the path to the distfile location. I am trying to correct the Makefile, I figure this is where it would be, and cannot figure out what to change to correct this. Can anyone help? Thanks Sean ---------------------------------------- Makefile below. tardis# more Makefile # New ports collection makefile for: Gnu Chess # Date created: 04 July 1996 # Whom: markm # # $FreeBSD: ports/games/gnuchess/Makefile,v 1.20 2004/12/28 23:19:42 edwin Exp $ # PORTNAME= gnuchess PORTVERSION= 5.07 CATEGORIES= games MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_GNU} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= chess MAINTAINER= conrads@cox.net COMMENT= "Classic" Gnu Chess PLIST_FILES= bin/gnuchess \ bin/gnuchessx .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS) PORTDOCS= ChangeLog \ NEWS \ README .endif OPTIONS= OPENING_BOOK "Install opening book (24 MB download)" on .include .if defined(WITH_OPENING_BOOK) DISTFILES+= book_1.01.pgn.gz PLIST_DIRS+= %%DATADIR%% PLIST_FILES+= %%DATADIR%%/book.dat EXTRACT_ONLY= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}${EXTRACT_SUFX} .endif USE_REINPLACE= yes GNU_CONFIGURE= yes CONFIGURE_TARGET= --build=${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} CONFIGURE_ENV= LIBS="${PTHREAD_LIBS}" post-patch: @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|-D_THREAD_SAFE|${PTHREAD_CFLAGS:S/"//g}|g ; \ s|-pthread ||g' ${WRKSRC}/configure pre-install: .if defined(WITH_OPENING_BOOK) @${SH} ${SCRIPTDIR}/create_opening_book.sh ${DISTDIR} ${WRKSRC} .endif post-install: ${LN} -f ${PREFIX}/bin/gnuchess ${PREFIX}/bin/gnuchessx .if defined(WITH_OPENING_BOOK) @${ECHO_CMD} Installing opening book ${MKDIR} ${DATADIR} && \ ${CP} ${WRKSRC}/src/book.dat ${DATADIR} .endif .if !defined(NOPORTDOCS) @${ECHO_CMD} Installing documentation ${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR} && \ ${CP} ${WRKSRC}/NEWS ${DOCSDIR} && \ ${CP} ${WRKSRC}/doc/* ${DOCSDIR} .endif .include From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 21:22:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3E316A4CF for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:22:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2811443D46 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:22:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hpxchan@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so625931wri for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:22:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kjRf8h/y1A51kZLIwMl9quhe7qQDRS6IqCJWvsJfFKV9o6cy2u94nQwxpJ75Q2tlylxMNf/Imd/sXpGCYnc68f4UkQQqjbwPNMBCerDd5HHmD2jChfkURMKAOTkaWEQJlPA9GYWn7XSCbwPl7q9wyEV9dr3EPKUCPewPgg2RdX8= Received: by 10.54.16.71 with SMTP id 71mr649561wrp; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.26.29 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:22:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6f77d33305010813224115f21c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:22:10 -0600 From: Chandler May To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ghostscript install error on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chandler May List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:22:13 -0000 HI, I'm having trouble installing ghostscript-gnu on FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE (in order to set up CUPS as a print server). It stops during compilation. make install distclean > gs_install_error only sent part of the output that I saw to the file "gs_install_error". Hopefully, the rest of it is not needed for troubleshooting. If it is needed, could somebody advise me as to how to capture all of the output in one file? It was complaining about implicit function declarations, among a few other warnings. Please help! I've had so much trouble with FreeBSD, I almost want to go back to Linux. Chandler ===> Building for ghostscript-gnu-7.07_11 >>> in pre-build ... >>> creating directories for compilation ... >>> building gimp-print library ... gmake all-recursive gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6' Making all in intl gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/intl' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/intl' Making all in include gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include' Making all in gimp-print gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include/gimp-print' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include/gimp-print' gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include' gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include' Making all in lib gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/lib' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/lib' Making all in man gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/man' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/man' Making all in src gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src' Making all in printdef gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/printdef' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/printdef' Making all in main gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/main' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/main' Making all in escputil gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/escputil' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/escputil' Making all in gimp gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/gimp' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/gimp' Making all in cups gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/cups' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/cups' Making all in foomatic gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/foomatic' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/foomatic' Making all in ghost gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/ghost' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/ghost' Making all in testpattern gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/testpattern' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/testpattern' gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src' gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src' Making all in samples gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/samples' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/samples' Making all in test gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/test' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/test' Making all in po gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/po' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/po' Making all in doc gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc' Making all in users_guide gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc/users_guide' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc/users_guide' gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc' gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc' gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6' >>> creating symlinks for gimp-print ... >>> creating symlinks for md2k ... >>> creating symlinks for alps ... >>> creating symlinks for bj10v ... >>> creating symlinks for bjc250 ... >>> creating symlinks for lips ... >>> building epag utility ... gmake: `ert' is up to date. >>> creating symlinks for epag ... >>> creating symlinks for eplaser ... >>> creating symlinks for mjc ... >>> creating symlinks for lxm3200 ... >>> creating symlinks for lex7000 ... cc `cat ./obj/cc.tr` -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -O -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -fno-builtin -fno-common -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I./gimp-print -I/usr/local/include/libpng -I/usr/local/include -I./obj -I./src -o ./obj/gdevl256.o -c ./src/gdevl256.c *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 21:26:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E911916A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:26:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EC943D4C for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:26:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C194F5129D; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:26:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:26:42 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sean Message-ID: <20050108212642.GA803@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41E04ECA.80508@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41E04ECA.80508@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Makefile correction? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:26:44 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:21:14PM -0500, Sean wrote: > Hello All, >=20 > I am trying to install gnuchess but when I start the build process=20 > it errors out as follows. >=20 > ---------------------------------------- > tardis# make install clean > =3D=3D=3D> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > =3D=3D=3D> Found saved configuration for gnuchess-5.07 > =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for gnuchess-5.07 > =3D> Checksum OK for book_1.01.pgn.gz. > /usr/ports/distfiles//gnuchess-5.07.tar.gz: No such file or directory > tar: Error opening archive: Empty input file: Inappropriate file type or= =20 > format > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/games/gnuchess. > ---------------------------------------- >=20 > From what I make of this it looks like there is an extra / in the path=20 > to the distfile location. That doesn't seem to be relevant. Try 'make clean' first, you may already have a stale extracted copy of an old version. Kris --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB4FASWry0BWjoQKURAgyGAJ4m5uWWxuj2O9YdOG9in3bEgpfzHgCfa2JA L/8dr1+0lxxiDgPUrKZirHc= =uuGy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 21:30:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA6616A4F5 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:30:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFC043D2D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:30:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20050108213022011003ct7je>; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:30:23 +0000 Message-ID: <41E050CA.1080507@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:29:46 -0500 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <41E04ECA.80508@comcast.net> <20050108212642.GA803@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050108212642.GA803@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Makefile correction? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:30:24 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:21:14PM -0500, Sean wrote: > >>Hello All, >> >> I am trying to install gnuchess but when I start the build process >> it errors out as follows. >> >>---------------------------------------- >>tardis# make install clean >>===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >>===> Found saved configuration for gnuchess-5.07 >>===> Extracting for gnuchess-5.07 >>=> Checksum OK for book_1.01.pgn.gz. >>/usr/ports/distfiles//gnuchess-5.07.tar.gz: No such file or directory >>tar: Error opening archive: Empty input file: Inappropriate file type or >>format >>*** Error code 1 >> >>Stop in /usr/ports/games/gnuchess. >>---------------------------------------- >> >>From what I make of this it looks like there is an extra / in the path >>to the distfile location. > > > That doesn't seem to be relevant. > > Try 'make clean' first, you may already have a stale extracted copy of > an old version. > > Kris Already tried the make clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 21:32:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F0216A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:32:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9C243D45 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:32:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <200501082132150110035otpe>; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:32:15 +0000 Message-ID: <41E0513A.4090301@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:31:38 -0500 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050106) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <41E04ECA.80508@comcast.net> <20050108212642.GA803@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050108212642.GA803@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Makefile correction? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:32:16 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:21:14PM -0500, Sean wrote: > >>Hello All, >> >> I am trying to install gnuchess but when I start the build process >> it errors out as follows. >> >>---------------------------------------- >>tardis# make install clean >>===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >>===> Found saved configuration for gnuchess-5.07 >>===> Extracting for gnuchess-5.07 >>=> Checksum OK for book_1.01.pgn.gz. >>/usr/ports/distfiles//gnuchess-5.07.tar.gz: No such file or directory >>tar: Error opening archive: Empty input file: Inappropriate file type or >>format >>*** Error code 1 >> >>Stop in /usr/ports/games/gnuchess. >>---------------------------------------- >> >>From what I make of this it looks like there is an extra / in the path >>to the distfile location. > > > That doesn't seem to be relevant. > > Try 'make clean' first, you may already have a stale extracted copy of > an old version. > > Kris The two // in '/usr/ports/distfiles//gnuchess-5.07.tar.gz:' would not cause the 'No such file or directory' error? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 21:34:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBBA16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:34:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 8of4.advertisnet.com (8of4.advertisnet.com [216.176.166.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4954343D53 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:34:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay@advertisnet.com) Received: from [216.176.166.162] (c166-p162.advertisnet.com [216.176.166.162]) (authenticated bits=0)j08L7inP030636 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:07:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.300 [265.6.9]); Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:34:40 -0600 Message-ID: <005901c4f5c9$dc817600$a2a6b0d8@right> From: "Jay Teutenberg" To: Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:34:40 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1; reply-type=original Subject: 5.x can ping 25152 bytes but not 25153 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:34:56 -0000 Hello, We are up against an interesting problem. We have several FBSD servers, the ones that are 5.x do not seem to be able to respond to pings larger than 25152, but 4.x kernels can. We are getting I/O errors from sendmail and want to make sure our networking is ok. We have tried swapping cables, ports in the cisco cat 2912, swapped 3com905's, no luck. Thanks all, my apologies if this is a bikeshed, I did my best to research it. Found some postings in this group last year where someone mentions this phenomena, but no fix or answer was offered. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2004-April/044070.html Jay -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.9 - Release Date: 1/6/2005 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 22:01:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477C416A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:01:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxsf11.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf11.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93FC43D3F for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:01:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from corey@31415926535.com) Received: from mxip17.cluster1.charter.net (mxip17a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.147])j08M1K3A007369 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:01:20 -0500 Received: from 66-190-90-73.cpe.ga.charter.com (HELO simon.compoundnet.home) (66.190.90.73) by mxip17.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2005 17:01:20 -0500 X-Ironport-AV: i="3.88,110,1102309200"; d="scan'208"; a="690502375:sNHT13896530" Received: from simon.compoundnet.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by simon.compoundnet.home (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j08M2NfX015708 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:02:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from corey@31415926535.com) Received: (from corey@localhost) by simon.compoundnet.home (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j08M2NRD015707 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:02:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from corey@31415926535.com) X-Authentication-Warning: simon.compoundnet.home: corey set sender to corey@31415926535.com using -f Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:02:23 -0500 From: Corey Bettenhausen To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050108220223.GB15324@31415926535.com> References: <1105210740.1193.6.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1105210740.1193.6.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Good image editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 22:01:22 -0000 On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:59:00PM -0500, Trey Sizemore wrote: > I'm looking for a good image editor / photo album program like Pixie > Plus or digikam (both of which I installed on 5.3 but are marked as > broken for 4.x and crash on my box when I try to do things like rotate > pictures). I want to be able to see the photos and do minor tweaks like > rotate (with EXIF data??, rename, etc.). The programs I mentioned > previously are great when they work, but... > > Thanks for any suggestions. > > -- > Cheers, > Trey > --- > > The world is full of obvious things > which nobody by any chance ever observes. > -- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle > > 1:54PM up 18:53, 0 users, load averages: 0.40, 0.25, 0.10 > FreeBSD salamander.thesizemores.net 5.3-STABLE i386 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Have you looked at the Gimp? /usr/ports/graphics/gimp http://www.gimp.org I use that for all of my photo editing needs. -Corey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 22:29:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97A316A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:29:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.fr (smtp3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7637243D45 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0302.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 39D661C00A44 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:29:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf0302.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1FDC61C00AB7 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:29:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:29:12 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <6610107427.20050108232912@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41E03E5E.9020001@leadhill.net> References: <41E03E5E.9020001@leadhill.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Reboot fails: 5 beeps and a freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 22:29:14 -0000 Billy Newsom writes: BN> ...and that's all I ever see. But while this is being printed to the BN> screen, I get five beeps. I don't remember that many beeps in FreeBSD 4.x. BN> BN> BEEP, beep beep beep, BEEP See http://bioscentral.com for a list of beep codes for many different BIOS. Most BIOS seem to use BEEP beep beep beep for video or memory errors, but check and see. BN> I don't know how long I've waited for the system to reboot, but so far BN> it hasn't. If the BIOS is unhappy, it's not going to reboot. -- Anthony From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 23:48:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA5116A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:48:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.ninjabucket.com (ninjabucket.com [65.174.56.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DDC43D2D for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:48:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron@snaphat.com) Received: from snaphat.com (pcp01483743pcs.frncht01.de.comcast.net [68.82.65.116]) by www.ninjabucket.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j08Nmon6081604; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:48:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from aaron@snaphat.com) Received: from [192.168.100.49] (localhost [192.168.100.49]) by snaphat.com (8.13.2/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j08Nmehb020427; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:48:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from aaron@snaphat.com) Message-ID: <41E07158.2010205@snaphat.com> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:48:40 -0500 From: Aaron Myles Landwehr User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsh.lists@comcast.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <41E04ECA.80508@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <41E04ECA.80508@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Makefile correction? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 23:48:53 -0000 Sean wrote: > Hello All, > > I am trying to install gnuchess but when I start the build process > it errors out as follows. > > ---------------------------------------- > tardis# make install clean > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> Found saved configuration for gnuchess-5.07 > ===> Extracting for gnuchess-5.07 > => Checksum OK for book_1.01.pgn.gz. > /usr/ports/distfiles//gnuchess-5.07.tar.gz: No such file or directory > tar: Error opening archive: Empty input file: Inappropriate file type > or format > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/games/gnuchess. > ---------------------------------------- Hello, I attempted to install the port and recieved the same error as you. The current makefile does not grab the gnuchess.tar.gz, whenever WITH_OPENING_BOOK is specified, because EXTRACT_ONLY is misplaced underneathe of that section. Comment out that EXTRACT_ONLY line and underneathe the MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR line add the following two lines: DISTFILES= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}${EXTRACT_SUFX} EXTRACT_ONLY= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}${EXTRACT_SUFX} I suppose someone should submit a patch for this... -Aaron Myles Landwehr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 23:50:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B3316A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:50:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4C943D49 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:50:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hpxchan@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so635017wri for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:50:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=t8eKw2/Y/xF6G6z2E30wrUYkKVUQ0pJxkMC5i+4VgcnWEsDHBAAbyZmwZYL4gO22VlblTJqE070G4NFNFfloPqZoDD63UKO/yQXpiNeNQp1QQfQUJXAvUnqiSU3iAwUwGnSvgw74wBhqcCJsNV3nGabsnurbi401cLrisCjsSvo= Received: by 10.54.30.27 with SMTP id d27mr504931wrd; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.26.29 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:50:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6f77d33305010815502a3d9cb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:50:15 -0600 From: Chandler May To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6f77d33305010813224115f21c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <6f77d33305010813224115f21c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: ghostscript install error on 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chandler May List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 23:50:32 -0000 On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 23:58:19 +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Chandler May wrote: > > > troubleshooting. If it is needed, could somebody advise me as to how > > to capture all of the output in one file? It was complaining about > > implicit function declarations, among a few other warnings. > > Try >& file on csh, or >file 2>&1 on sh (and compatibles). That will > also redirect stderr into the file (instead of just stdout). > > Thanks for the tip! Here is the entire output when I try to install ghostscript-gnu (on FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE), including errors: ===> Building for ghostscript-gnu-7.07_11 >>> in pre-build ... >>> creating directories for compilation ... >>> building gimp-print library ... gmake all-recursive gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6' Making all in intl gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/intl' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/intl' Making all in include gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include' Making all in gimp-print gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include/gimp-print' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include/gimp-print' gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include' gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/include' Making all in lib gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/lib' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/lib' Making all in man gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/man' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/man' Making all in src gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src' Making all in printdef gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/printdef' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/printdef' Making all in main gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/main' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/main' Making all in escputil gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/escputil' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/escputil' Making all in gimp gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/gimp' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/gimp' Making all in cups gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/cups' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/cups' Making all in foomatic gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/foomatic' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/foomatic' Making all in ghost gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/ghost' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/ghost' Making all in testpattern gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/testpattern' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src/testpattern' gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src' gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/src' Making all in samples gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/samples' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/samples' Making all in test gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/test' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/test' Making all in po gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/po' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/po' Making all in doc gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc' Makefile:689: warning: overriding commands for target `mostlyclean-aminfo' Makefile:375: warning: ignoring old commands for target `mostlyclean-aminfo' Making all in users_guide gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc/users_guide' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc/users_guide' gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc' Makefile:689: warning: overriding commands for target `mostlyclean-aminfo' Makefile:375: warning: ignoring old commands for target `mostlyclean-aminfo' gmake[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc' gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6/doc' gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6' gmake[2]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu/work/ghostscript-7.07/gimp-print-4.2.6' >>> creating symlinks for gimp-print ... >>> creating symlinks for md2k ... >>> creating symlinks for alps ... >>> creating symlinks for bj10v ... >>> creating symlinks for bjc250 ... >>> creating symlinks for lips ... >>> building epag utility ... gmake: `ert' is up to date. >>> creating symlinks for epag ... >>> creating symlinks for eplaser ... >>> creating symlinks for mjc ... >>> creating symlinks for lxm3200 ... >>> creating symlinks for lex7000 ... src/contrib.mak:1415: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/lips3.dev' src/contrib.mak:602: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/lips3.dev' src/gnudevs.mak:79: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/stp.dev' src/contrib.mak:1259: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/stp.dev' src/gnudevs.mak:84: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/gdevstp.o' src/contrib.mak:1263: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/gdevstp.o' src/gnudevs.mak:94: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/cdj670.dev' src/contrib.mak:885: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/cdj670.dev' src/gnudevs.mak:99: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/cdj850.dev' src/contrib.mak:888: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/cdj850.dev' src/gnudevs.mak:104: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/cdj890.dev' src/contrib.mak:894: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/cdj890.dev' src/gnudevs.mak:109: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/cdj1600.dev' src/contrib.mak:897: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/cdj1600.dev' src/gnudevs.mak:113: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/gdevcd8.o' src/contrib.mak:901: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/gdevcd8.o' src/gnudevs.mak:125: warning: overriding commands for target `obj/cdj880.dev' src/contrib.mak:891: warning: ignoring old commands for target `obj/cdj880.dev' cc `cat ./obj/cc.tr` -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -O -pipe -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -fno-builtin -fno-common -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I./gimp-print -I/usr/local/include/libpng -I/usr/local/include -I./obj -I./src -o ./obj/gdevl256.o -c ./src/gdevl256.c In file included from ./src/std.h:25, from ./src/memory_.h:26, from ./src/gdevl256.c:33: ./src/stdpre.h:181:4: warning: suggest hiding #pragma from traditional C with an indented # ./src/gdevl256.c:39:17: vga.h: No such file or directory ./src/gdevl256.c:40:19: vgagl.h: No such file or directory ./src/gdevl256.c:107: warning: non-static declaration of 'lvga256_open' follows static declaration ./src/gdevl256.c:71: warning: previous declaration of 'lvga256_open' was here ./src/gdevl256.c: In function `lvga256_open': ./src/gdevl256.c:107: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions ./src/gdevl256.c:111: warning: implicit declaration of function `vga_init' ./src/gdevl256.c:112: warning: implicit declaration of function `vga_getdefaultmode' ./src/gdevl256.c:114: error: `G320x200x256' undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/gdevl256.c:114: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ./src/gdevl256.c:114: error: for each function it appears in.) ./src/gdevl256.c:115: warning: implicit declaration of function `vga_setmode' ./src/gdevl256.c:116: warning: implicit declaration of function `gl_setcontextvga' ./src/gdevl256.c:117: warning: implicit declaration of function `vga_getxdim' ./src/gdevl256.c:118: warning: implicit declaration of function `vga_getydim' ./src/gdevl256.c:129: warning: implicit declaration of function `gl_setpalettecolor' ./src/gdevl256.c: At top level: ./src/gdevl256.c:142: warning: non-static declaration of 'lvga256_close' follows static declaration ./src/gdevl256.c:72: warning: previous declaration of 'lvga256_close' was here ./src/gdevl256.c: In function `lvga256_close': ./src/gdevl256.c:142: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions ./src/gdevl256.c:143: error: `TEXT' undeclared (first use in this function) ./src/gdevl256.c: At top level: ./src/gdevl256.c:154: warning: non-static declaration of 'lvga256_map_rgb_color' follows static declaration ./src/gdevl256.c:73: warning: previous declaration of 'lvga256_map_rgb_color' was here ./src/gdevl256.c: In function `lvga256_map_rgb_color': ./src/gdevl256.c:154: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions ./src/gdevl256.c: At top level: ./src/gdevl256.c:201: warning: non-static declaration of 'lvga256_map_color_rgb' follows static declaration ./src/gdevl256.c:74: warning: previous declaration of 'lvga256_map_color_rgb' was here ./src/gdevl256.c: In function `lvga256_map_color_rgb': ./src/gdevl256.c:201: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions ./src/gdevl256.c: At top level: ./src/gdevl256.c:216: warning: non-static declaration of 'lvga256_copy_mono' follows static declaration ./src/gdevl256.c:77: warning: previous declaration of 'lvga256_copy_mono' was here ./src/gdevl256.c: In function `lvga256_copy_mono': ./src/gdevl256.c:216: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions ./src/gdevl256.c:233: warning: implicit declaration of function `gl_fillbox' ./src/gdevl256.c:244: warning: implicit declaration of function `gl_setpixel' ./src/gdevl256.c: At top level: ./src/gdevl256.c:262: warning: non-static declaration of 'lvga256_copy_color' follows static declaration ./src/gdevl256.c:78: warning: previous declaration of 'lvga256_copy_color' was here ./src/gdevl256.c: In function `lvga256_copy_color': ./src/gdevl256.c:262: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions ./src/gdevl256.c:267: warning: implicit declaration of function `gl_putbox' ./src/gdevl256.c: At top level: ./src/gdevl256.c:280: warning: non-static declaration of 'lvga256_fill_rectangle' follows static declaration ./src/gdevl256.c:75: warning: previous declaration of 'lvga256_fill_rectangle' was here ./src/gdevl256.c: In function `lvga256_fill_rectangle': ./src/gdevl256.c:280: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions ./src/gdevl256.c: At top level: ./src/gdevl256.c:294: warning: non-static declaration of 'lvga256_tile_rectangle' follows static declaration ./src/gdevl256.c:76: warning: previous declaration of 'lvga256_tile_rectangle' was here ./src/gdevl256.c: In function `lvga256_tile_rectangle': ./src/gdevl256.c:294: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions ./src/gdevl256.c: At top level: ./src/gdevl256.c:306: warning: non-static declaration of 'lvga256_draw_line' follows static declaration ./src/gdevl256.c:79: warning: previous declaration of 'lvga256_draw_line' was here ./src/gdevl256.c: In function `lvga256_draw_line': ./src/gdevl256.c:306: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions ./src/gdevl256.c:307: warning: implicit declaration of function `gl_line' gmake: *** [obj/gdevl256.o] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu.