From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Oct 7 19:43:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E9337B502 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 19:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 13i6Qg-0006lP-00; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 03:43:10 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA81768; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 03:43:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 03:43:09 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: Kris Kennaway Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: .net threat ? Message-ID: <20001008034309.A81741@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20001006025604.C55421@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20001007045235.A15854@citusc17.usc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20001007045235.A15854@citusc17.usc.edu>; from kris@citusc.usc.edu on Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 04:52:35AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 04:52:35AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: | On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 02:56:04AM +0100, j mckitrick wrote: | > | > >From what I have read lately, M$ just might be onto something with this .NET | > idea. According to an article on Oreillynet, they are changing their | > approach, and this time learning from some of their past mistakes. Does | > this have any great impact on the ongoing OS war? Any thoughts? | | Yeah, stop being so eager to believe everything you read ;-) I just like keeping tabs on the enemy. :) Besides, it seems M$ is starting to wise up now, and that is not a good thing. jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message