From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 29 02:17:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0E216A400 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:17:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322DC13C469 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:17:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([24.126.17.68]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20070429021735.TCVG13783.mta13.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:17:35 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 23A13BA94; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:18:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:18:00 -0400 From: Parv To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20070429021759.GA2862@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Jerry McAllister , Graham North , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <463390A0.20508@shaw.ca> <20070429010026.GB9913@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070429010026.GB9913@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Graham North Subject: Re: normal mount points X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: f-q List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:17:36 -0000 in message <20070429010026.GB9913@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>, wrote Jerry McAllister thusly... > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 11:21:20AM -0700, Graham North wrote: > > > I ran the df command last night to check slice sizes in > > anticipation of doing some backup and eventual tranfer to a new > > machine. The output gave me not just normal slices that were > > created at install but also three additional (mount points?) > > /proc > > /net > > /host > > No problem. /proc is sort of a psuedo file system that enables > some routines such as top to look at certain pieces of > information. > > Probably /net and /host are also psuedo file systems, but I have > never seen them before. If they are legit, they are for something > I do not run. Could it be that /{ne,hos}t mount points are due to use of a{manda,utomounter}? - Parv --