Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:10:27 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> To: =?UTF-8?B?QmVybmhhcmQgRnLDtmhsaWNo?= <decke@bluelife.at> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org Ports" <ports@freebsd.org>, Jason bacon <jwbacon@tds.net> Subject: Re: [QAT] r334788: 1x depend (depend_package in databases/rrdtool), 3x leftovers Message-ID: <5293AEB3.1040203@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAE-m3X3YoGN3DDhPn6UgFF1ME9mC9VPZTpa3OxVNU%2BQDFEQYJA@mail.gmail.com> References: <E1VkgMl-000AjC-BO@qat.redports.org> <529310AE.7050805@passap.ru> <52935DFB.5080602@tds.net> <5293891F.4080607@passap.ru> <CAE-m3X3YoGN3DDhPn6UgFF1ME9mC9VPZTpa3OxVNU%2BQDFEQYJA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
25.11.2013 22:44, Bernhard Fröhlich пишет: > Am 25.11.2013 18:30 schrieb "Boris Samorodov" <bsam@passap.ru>: >> >> (reformatted for consistency sake) >> >> 25.11.2013 18:26, Jason bacon пишет: >>> On 11/25/13 2:56 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm not sure how to deal with /home/$USER leftovers (i.e. while >>>> package install a new user/group is created and while package >>>> deinstalled /home/$USER becomes a leftover, but we display a >>>> message that a user should be removed manually): >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> ====================<phase 7: make package>==================== >>>> ===> Building package for slurm-2.6.4 >>>> Deleting slurm-2.6.4 >>>> Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages: >>>> >>>> slurm-2.6.4 >>>> >>>> The deinstallation will free 51 MB >>>> [1/1] Deleting slurm-2.6.4...==> You should manually remove the > "slurm" >>>> user. >>>> done >>>> ================================================================ >>>> >>>> === Checking filesystem state >>>> list of extra files and directories in / (not present before this port >>>> was installed but present after it was deinstalled) >>>> 30528 8 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel >>>> 64 Nov 24 20:32 home >>>> 34619 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 slurm slurm >>>> 0 Nov 24 20:32 home/slurm >>>> [...] >>>> >>> The files in /home/$USER (and /var) should be preserved. Deinstalls may >>> be part of an upgrade process, vs permanent removal, and some of these >>> files contain usage statistics needed by sysadmins for reporting. >>> >>> I would suggest the following deinstall message: >>> >>> "You may remove /home/$USER if you are no longer using SLURM." >> >> Yep, that is the question: why did QAT suggests manuall removing >> _and_ exit with error code? > > With my QAT hat on I consider this a false positive. You can safely ignore > that complain from QAT. Noted, thanks! -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5293AEB3.1040203>