From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 21 15:47:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA24033 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 21 Mar 1998 15:47:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA24019 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 1998 15:47:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA04236; Sat, 21 Mar 1998 18:47:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) Message-Id: <199803212347.SAA04236@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: CURRENT Kernel Status In-Reply-To: <199803212200.PAA06995@usr09.primenet.com> from Terry Lambert at "Mar 21, 98 10:00:18 pm" To: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 18:47:38 -0500 (EST) Cc: root@danberlin.resnet.rochester.edu, karl@mcs.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG From: "John S. Dyson" Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry Lambert said: > > I know that fsck will not necessarily be able to return the disk > to the state that it would have been without the failure, but it > should be possible for it to return it to a self-consistent state. > > If it can't, then we need to fix it (IMO). > Excellent!!! A project to keep Terry out of trouble :-). -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message