Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:13:05 +0100 From: Michael Landin Hostbaek <mich@FreeBSD.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy Chadwick <jdc@koitsu.org>, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Core Dump / panic sleeping thread Message-ID: <424B99CB-A6D3-4219-A21E-62E5FB778E82@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20130320094954.GV3794@kib.kiev.ua> References: <5148A454.1080303@FreeBSD.org> <153890828.4081736.1363736263509.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> <20130320094954.GV3794@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 20, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> = wrote: >=20 > I do not like it. As I said in the previous response to Andrey, > I think that moving the vnode_pager_setsize() after the unlock is > better, since it reduces races with other thread seeing half-done > attribute update or making attribute change simultaneously. OK - so should I wait for another patch - or?=20 Thanks, /mich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?424B99CB-A6D3-4219-A21E-62E5FB778E82>