From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 9 00:03:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7761016A4CE for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:03:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sender.vkt.lt (sender.vkt.lt [212.59.30.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B73143D39 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:03:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hugle@vkt.lt) Received: (qmail 3613 invoked by uid 89); 9 Feb 2005 01:10:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO user-8-177.vkt.lan) (192.168.8.177) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 01:10:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 02:04:03 +0200 From: Jara X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.1.33) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <537516181.20050209020403@vkt.lt> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: IPFW pipe v 4.10-stable vs 5.3-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:03:59 -0000 Hello all. I have a little problem with same ipfw+dummynet options on different FreeBSD versions, look: I add thse rules: pipe 128 config mask src-ip 0xffffffff bw 128Kbit/s add 53098 pipe 128 ip from any to table'(10)' in pipe 127 config mask dst-ip 0xffffffff bw 64Kbit/s pipe 127 ip from table'(10)' to any in so ipfw -l shows: 53098 pipe 128 ip from any to table(10) in 53099 pipe 127 ip from table(10) to any in Now... I u use this configuration under 4.10-stable everything is ok But when i try 5.3-stable download traffic (pipe 128) is reduced twise - down to 64kbits If i remove ' in' from the ipfw command - download grows up to 128kbits. (if i remove ' in' from upload (pipe 127) it stays untouched - 64kbits) Where I could make a mistake ? net.link.ether.ipfw is set to 0 Thanks! Cheers, Jarek