Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:26:16 -0500 From: Ian Lord <mailing-lists@msdi.ca> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug ?: SCHED_4BSD VS SCHED_ULE Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20051104082348.04a27dd0@pop.msdi.ca> In-Reply-To: <20051104083850.GA17364@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051103225321.0252cc58@pop.msdi.ca> <20051104083850.GA17364@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry about the rc.conf mistake, I should sleep more at night instead of typing stupidities :) I was meaning /usr/src/sys/amd64/config/MYKERNEL I am running freebsd 5.4 amd64 version Should there be a big improvement from running ULE ?, nobody reported the bug I have with it ? Thanks At 03:38 2005-11-04, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:58:58PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am running amd64 version on a Dell 2850 Dual Xeon processor with emt64 > > > > as soon as I turn on SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_4BSD in rc.conf, the > > system starts to behave strangely. > > > > During boot, named and sshd can't start normally, system is unstable, etc > > > > Is that a known bug or isnt it suppose to work anyway on this kind of > > system ? > >You forgot to mention what version of FreeBSD you're running. Also, >you don't control the scheduler from rc.conf, it's compiled into your >kernel. > >Anyway, SCHED_ULE is better on 6.0 than on previous releases, but it's >still not officially supported, and there are some known problems with >it. > >Kris >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.3.4.2.20051104082348.04a27dd0>