Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Mar 2016 06:23:28 -0500
From:      dweimer <dweimer@dweimer.net>
To:        Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org>
Cc:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Upcoming Releases
Message-ID:  <91216ae32782a50986763e7bc1c3a339@dweimer.net>
In-Reply-To: <D7F159DB-757F-4637-A9A7-B9F4C10F665C@lafn.org>
References:  <EEFD0376-2038-4801-9A7A-BF342B66F029@lafn.org> <20160305181742.9c3abe96.freebsd@edvax.de> <DE7BAC1A-0B40-4B2A-861A-6AE7B16FAC0D@lafn.org> <DBC62E3B-B07D-4A3F-AD22-E3EB62484725@lafn.org> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1603152209110.3734@wonkity.com> <D7F159DB-757F-4637-A9A7-B9F4C10F665C@lafn.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 2016-03-16 12:20 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> On 15 March 2016, at 21:11, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Doug Hardie wrote:
>> 
>>> I recently saw a comment in one of the maillists that 11.0 was likely 
>>> to have the new packetized base feature.  That tells me that 11.0 is 
>>> most likely to be dicey to work with.  I am reminded when the new pkg 
>>> system came out and the supporting servers were compromised.
>> 
>> To the best of my knowledge, there was no relation between pkg and any 
>> compromises.
> 
> There was a period where the regular pkg servers were not available
> because they had to be rebuilt.  I don't recall the dates.  It was not
> pkg_ng, but the first major revision to pkg after that.
> 

It wasn't because of the pkg / pkg_ng update though, if memory servers 
me correct a committer's username/password was comprised. It was just a 
coincidence that it happened around the same time update, but wasn't 
related to it.

-- 
Thanks,
    Dean E. Weimer
    http://www.dweimer.net/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91216ae32782a50986763e7bc1c3a339>