Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 6 Jul 2003 07:02:17 -0700
From:      Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
To:        clemens fischer <ino-qc@spotteswoode.de.eu.org>
Cc:        ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ipfw1 <-> ipfw2 compatibility?
Message-ID:  <20030706070217.A17595@xorpc.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <of08hr8u.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de>; from ino-qc@spotteswoode.de.eu.org on Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 12:41:21PM %2B0200
References:  <of08hr8u.fsf@ID-23066.news.dfncis.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 12:41:21PM +0200, clemens fischer wrote:
> with a working set of ipfw1 rules and the desire to test ipfw2, can i
> be sure the ipfw1 ruleset will work unmodified with ipfw2 enabled?  i

It depends a lot on which rules you use.
You should really read the ipfw manpage in the section detailing
the differences between the two. There are ipfw1 bugs that ipfw2
has fixed, and possibly different bugs in ipfw2 that do not exist
in ipfw1.

	cheers
	luigi

> have synced both the kernel sources and userland using cvsup(1) today
> and rebuilding world.
> 
>   clemens
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ipfw-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030706070217.A17595>