From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 12:42:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F3316A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av15-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av15-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DC443D5D for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:42:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av15-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 1698837E45; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:42:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.181]) by av15-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042AD37E42 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:42:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp4-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AD73E37E46 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 8706 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Apr 2004 19:42:04 -0000 Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:42:03 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Andreas Davour Message-ID: <20040409194203.GA3266@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Andreas Davour , Martin Hudec , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> <20040409192512.GB12347@pleiades.aeternal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Martin Hudec cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:42:07 -0000 On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 09:34:09PM +0200, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote: > > > Hi Andreas, > > > > don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory? > > No. > > > Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled? > > No, I have it commented out, since I left all the individual ports > collections in there instead, except for arabic, hebrew and some other > exotic languages. That was a bad idea, since new collections are added from time to time. If you really feel the need to avoid fetching some ports-categories it is better to use a refuse file instead. Personally I stopped doing even that some time ago, since some make targets require a complete ports tree. Unless you are seriously short on diskspace I would strongly recommend using 'ports-all' to a complete ports tree. > > Could it be I have made such a basic mistake as to not cvsup'ed a vital > dependedcy?! I kind of figured the newly cvsup'ed port of cvsup would have > included a new example file of ports-supfile if that had been the problem. It does seem as if your ports-supfile is at fault, yes. > > One should never *expect* a computer to do something I guess. > > Would something strange happen now if I added a line for > 'ports-accessability' in my ports-supfile and tried to cvsup again? Probably not. > > I guess I *really* should do a pkgdb -Uu then? -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se