Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 16:59:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> To: mirror@solnet.ch (Thomas Vogt) Cc: Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com>, rab@freebsdmall.com, hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 vs amd64 ISO download statistics/trends Message-ID: <200610181459.k9IExUY1046025@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <1161165218.67931.4.camel@bert.mlan.solnet.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Vogt wrote: > ftp2.ch.freebsd.org: > Statistic from the last 7 days: > grep IMAGES xferlog.20061010 | grep 6.1-RELEASE | grep -c amd64 > 385 > > grep IMAGES xferlog.20061010| grep 6.1-RELEASE | grep -c i386 > 1290 If you do it that way, you will count a _lot_ of duplicates because of partial transfers, regets etc. You should count only complete transfers. On ftp7.de.freebsd.org it makes a difference of factor 10 (roughly)! Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200610181459.k9IExUY1046025>