Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:02:43 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSL ASM patch Message-ID: <20010211130243.V3274@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <20010211125042.B79375@mollari.cthul.hu>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:50:42PM -0800 References: <20010211094946.A51308@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010211122802.A78975@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010211124707.S3274@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010211125042.B79375@mollari.cthul.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> [010211 12:52] wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > Looks awesome, someone complained that Linux was able to maintain > > an order of magnitude more SSL connections than FreeBSD, since you > > say this gives us a 3-5x speed up, I'd really like to see it committed > > and ported to -stable ASAP. > > Yep! Just want to give a few days for people to comment on the > MACHINE_CPU thing. > > > Is it possible to have multiple ASM cores and use the appropriate > > routines? Or must it all be choosen at compile time? > > It's done at compile-time. bah, lame. :( How is the worst asm code vs the best C code again? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010211130243.V3274>