From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 16 23:33:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 39F7A16A4D3; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:33:23 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:33:23 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: Benjamin Keating Message-ID: <20050316233323.GL91771@hub.freebsd.org> References: <781e2bc005031615297b65879b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <781e2bc005031615297b65879b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS and rc.conf options (statd lockd, necessary?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:33:23 -0000 On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:29:57PM -0800, Benjamin Keating wrote: > rpc_lockd_enable="NO" # Run NFS rpc.lockd needed for client/server. > rpc_statd_enable="NO" # Run NFS rpc.statd needed for client/server. > ---- > > > Are these to be used or are they obsolete? I don't understand why the > handbook makes no mention of these and I'd like to know what they are. That's what manpages are for :-) Yes, it's best to run them because they provide useful functionality. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe