From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Feb 13 14:40:38 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from area51.fremont.ca.us (adsl-63-195-147-14.dsl.scrm01.pacbell.net [63.195.147.14])
	by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E98A145C1; Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:40:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mharo@localhost)
	by area51.fremont.ca.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA43965;
	Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:40:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mharo)
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:40:41 -0800
From: Michael Haro <mharo@FreeBSD.org>
To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: linux port category
Message-ID: <20000213144040.A43802@FreeBSD.org>
Reply-To: mharo@FreeBSD.org
References: <200002130206.SAA89767@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000212182038.H776@norn.ca.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <20000212182038.H776@norn.ca.eu.org>; from cpiazza@jaxon.net on Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 06:20:38PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 06:20:38PM -0800, Chris Piazza wrote:
> 
> Hmm..  This port would be greatly simplified if we had something like
> a linux ports category where linux libraries could be installed from.
> 
> Does anyone think this would be a good idea?  Are we going to have 
> enough linux binary ports to make this worth it?

I was thinking about this yesterday as well.  I was also thinking of 
possibly prepending linux ports with `lnx-' or something to show that 
this is the linux version of port xyz.

Michael


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message