Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:45:51 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@q9media.com> Cc: Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>, freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: whois(1) patch Message-ID: <20010622094551.D38146@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <B758ED5A.D6D%mike@q9media.com>; from mike@q9media.com on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:40:58PM -0400 References: <20010622032318.A506@dragon.nuxi.com> <B758ED5A.D6D%mike@q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:40:58PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > Yes. Lets plan for a sweep in 6mo. or so and make the conversion. > > Many of us don't want the CSRG derived sources in various forms -- they > > should be kept consistent. > > Perhaps we should also remove the register storage-classes at that time. With out a doubt. I sort of see it as an ANSI'ifcation as such compilers tend to ignore `register' a lot more than K&R ones. > The best time to do this is probably right before 5.0 enters BETA, as to > reduce the differences between -STABLE and -CURRENT. Is that your thinking > as well? Not yet sure when the best time will be. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010622094551.D38146>