From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 19 22:30:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48F679 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 920DA24D0 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9JMU131090530 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9JMU1i8090528; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:30:01 GMT Message-Id: <201310192230.r9JMU1i8090528@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: ports/182495: net/wizd: svn revision 302141 broke install of port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:30:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/182495; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Scot Hetzel To: Tijl Coosemans , kikuchan@uranus.dti.ne.jp Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/182495: net/wizd: svn revision 302141 broke install of port Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 17:26:32 -0500 On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Hi Scot, > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/182495 > > The port seems to have been removed back in August. Do you think it's > worthwhile to restore it? Do you want to be maintainer? I don't use the port, but there is one user waiting for the port to be restored. Kikuchan would you like to be come the new maintainer of this port if it is restored? -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.