Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:47:55 +1100 From: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> To: Lars Engels <lars.engels@0x20.net>, Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <5A2E625B.3020703@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <20171211104230.GV19238@e.0x20.net> References: <a66d1c33-e405-d9e8-d9c3-2738b5e66887@cloudzeeland.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712080956580.41281@wonkity.com> <20171208180905.GA96560@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091013310.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> <20171209012522.GA42506@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091451300.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> <fe88c5e6-155d-dd64-96d5-8f394c41d92f@FreeBSD.org> <20171210171122.GA48536@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <EC0F9F41-4A57-4A8F-A7B4-67D954182DDA@adamw.org> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712110904320.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> <20171211104230.GV19238@e.0x20.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lars Engels wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 09:09:39AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> >>> DMA is a phenomenal program and is totally sufficient for a large >>> percentage of our user-base. I wasn’t aware of the lack of .forward >>> support, and I completely agree that that’s a very detrimental omission. >> What about its spam filtering, such as /etc/mail/access and DNSBLs etc? >> > pkg install $some_spam_filtering_software_of_your_choice > > That's not what belongs into base. > He didn't say spam filtering software. Sendmail in base may be neutered, but it includes basic access controls and spam filtering rules. Does the Dragonfly Mail Agent? Personally I think if you remove Sendmail you should not replace it with something else... but then FreeBSD is not about what I want or what the users want anymore. Michelle
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A2E625B.3020703>