Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 14:13:31 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov <bp@butya.kz> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Build status Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10004181409500.82393-100000@lion.butya.kz> In-Reply-To: <14259.956039161@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <00Apr18.152537est.115213@border.alcanet.com.au>, Peter Jeremy write > s: > > >IMHO, it's not such a bad idea. freebsd-current _is_ the place to > >report problems with -current, why can't the report be produced by a > >daemon? All the MUA's I've ever used allowed me to delete a mail > >before reading all of it, so I don't see that having detailed > >information (at the end) is a real issue (though it might be for > >someove paying by the byte). > > I agree. As one of those who pays for an incoming traffic I'm prefer a short letter with a list of directories where warning/errors happens and an URL with full listing. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10004181409500.82393-100000>