From owner-cvs-all  Fri Aug  2  5:35:19 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E6AA937B400; Fri,  2 Aug 2002 05:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.139.170])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 59BEF43E42; Fri,  2 Aug 2002 05:35:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org)
Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (uucp@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g72CZ7pN086825;
	Fri, 2 Aug 2002 13:35:07 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with UUCP id g72CZ7l6086824;
	Fri, 2 Aug 2002 13:35:07 +0100 (BST)
Received: from grimreaper.grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by grimreaper.grondar.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g72CUqRZ039243;
	Fri, 2 Aug 2002 13:30:52 +0100 (BST)
	(envelope-from mark@grimreaper.grondar.org)
Message-Id: <200208021230.g72CUqRZ039243@grimreaper.grondar.org>
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/examples/etc make.conf 
References: <20020802114413.GA9853@sunbay.com> 
In-Reply-To: <20020802114413.GA9853@sunbay.com> ; from Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>  "Fri, 02 Aug 2002 14:44:13 +0300."
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 13:30:52 +0100
From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

[ excessive quoting snipped ]

> Yes, so what?  NOUUCP read: (bool) Set to not build uucp(1) related program=
> s.

rmail is a part of sendmail.

NOUUCP was of use to remove an entire subsystem, but to have a global
option to remove a single binary makes no sense. NOUUCP really meant
NORMAIL, and as such was badly named and a poor precedent (are we going
to have NOCAT next?)

If rmail really needs removing, then we need to properly remove it from
base and let UUCP users use ports-sendmail.

Can we please not discuss to death one binary applet?

M
-- 
o       Mark Murray
\_
O.\_    Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message