Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 23:51:41 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org, bde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ext2fs support for writing - what's the verdict? Message-ID: <96512.970728701@winston.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 09:28:36 %2B1100." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010050916340.11864-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have 64K off uncommitted diffs (-c2) for ext2fs, but none for sparse > superblocks. This problem is easy to work around by not using > unsupported optional features. Run tune2fs and e2fsck under Linux to > turn off the features (see tune2fs(8)). That's a nice idea and may work in my particular case, but this is also the out-of-box configuration for Red Hat and most Linux-to-FreeBSD users wouldn't know a tune2fs if it snuck up and bit them on the ass in broad daylight. How hard would it be to support sparse superblocks? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96512.970728701>