From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 10 16:39:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E9F16A420 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:39:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC1443D46 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:39:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k1AGdWFM029243 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:39:33 +0200 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1AGcjpA011386; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:38:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1AGci7g011385; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:38:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:38:44 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Ben Kaduk Message-ID: <20060210163844.GB11095@flame.pc> References: <200602101530.k1AFUEtr095055@freefall.freebsd.org> <1942942743.20060210164259@rulez.sk> <47d0403c0602100816y6f15451coeb1f0e375339d883@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47d0403c0602100816y6f15451coeb1f0e375339d883@mail.gmail.com> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.534, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, AWL 0.86, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: docs/93014: minor nits in the project model book (dev-model) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:39:45 -0000 On 2006-02-10 10:16, Ben Kaduk wrote: >On 2/10/06, Daniel Gerzo <[1]danger@rulez.sk> wrote: >>>> - For slips of time not to become too long with regards to security >>>> + For slips of time not to become to long with regards to security >>>> and stability issues, extra discipline is required when committing changes to -STABLE. >>> >>> Hmmm, not really. The original text is ok. "too long" refers to the >>> length of a time period. I'm not sure what "to long" would mean here. >>> >> >> looks okay to me too. > > I guess I should apologize -- I made this diff hastily, and put the > arguments in the wrong order -- the original text has "to long," > I am proposing to change it to "too long". Unless I'm > misunderstanding you, here. Oh crap! I didn't notice that the filenames were reverse. No need to apologize at all; it was me being hasty. Committed now, thanks :)