Date: Sun, 01 Dec 1996 04:28:35 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: wwong@wiley.csusb.edu, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCSI A/V drives Message-ID: <15532.849443315@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 Nov 1996 17:20:17 MST." <199611280020.RAA29436@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Apparently, the producer "cooked the books" on the movie, and could > not go for another movie without opening his crime to scrutiny. This subject is more or less dead now so I won't prolong it, but just out of general curiousity - why couldn't they simply find another producer? If you can swap directors or even major stars for sequels, it certainly seems odd indeed that you can't swap something as imminently exchangable as a producer. He's just the guy who comes up with the bucks, right? I've never heard of a producer having an exclusive contract. ;-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15532.849443315>