From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 19 18:19:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD4C1065679 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50ED48FC13 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:19:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie12 with SMTP id 12so2735998yie.13 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BZp+zYmux4tUvSdgzgIaSTuRDyr9WyeG0fXSJeY17Vk=; b=Z594/LNuF1aVMi+g7ueM08Hy5H6FdkOAAum4peqllJo40oXrDgANPHAgegY7DFS3tE yojiQEodGoiF4ZJKe4Ss0ndo3HHUUfigyWcn7FnJxi0J0thGnaBmyETmfUY+5RE2KcNA VTrBC+6l4zAA2ElRylGANm/5akZJ6T/UOE5C4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=X6o0PTBnd1/oxT8UoF4a70vp87zntGowxMDRFhGxnfWZM8iSUqJ2stg8wtwTfBqanp 6Y5bzS+79QJR41tpbFRsiKuZIDCT3ZYGGAbm12Plp3I3y8TJSc7MX5o2dXJ1E6TKWKED Et9A0vOYVV5heA+rDfx+AOhL/xoYD1+WF/Bfg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.131.10 with SMTP id e10mr5565173agd.96.1303237170356; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.161.16 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:19:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Freddie Cash To: "K. Macy" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Nikolay Denev , Ingo Flaschberger , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Routing enhancement - reduce routing table locking X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:19:31 -0000 On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:42 AM, K. Macy wrote: >> I'm not able to find IFNET_MULTIQUEUE in a recent 8.2-STABLE, is this something >> present only in HEAD? > > It looks like it is now EM_MULTIQUEUE. Just curious, how would one enable this to test it? We have igb(4) interfaces in our new storage boxes, and it would be interesting to test whether or not it helps in our setup. -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com