Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:23:07 +0400
From:      Vladimir Grebenschikov <vova@fbsd.ru>
To:        Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?
Message-ID:  <1097839388.1049.24.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20041015100633.GA45863@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
References:  <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <20041014105927.GU718@empiric.icir.org><416EC5F4.8000203@mac.com> <416EDA36.1070403@DeepCore.dk> <416EE19D.50400@mac.com> <20041015100633.GA45863@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=F7 =D0=D4, 15/10/2004 =D7 20:06 +1000, Peter Jeremy =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4:
> On Thu, 2004-Oct-14 16:29:17 -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >Is burncd able to burn a DVD [+/-{R,W,RAM}] to an IDE device without usi=
ng=20
> >ATAPICAM?
>=20
> dd(1) does a reasonable job of burning pre-formatted DVD+RWs.  I would
> expect it to handle DVD-RAM but I'm not sure about write-once media.
>=20
> >  I think it is not unreasonable to expect the GENERIC kernel to=20
> >be able to burn DVDs, as that can make for a reasonable backup mechanism=
.
>=20
> I tend to agree.  For some time, FreeBSD has been heading away from
> requiring users to re-compile the kernel.  If ATAPICAM can't be
> (readily) turned into a module, it would seem reasonable to have it
> built into GENERIC.
>=20
> Whilst we're discussing ATAPICAM, even after I make /dev/cd0[ac] mode
> 666, I can't write to it as a non-root user.  Does anyone know the
> rationale for this and which particular EPERM is the culprit?  I've
> had a quick look at the source but can't see nothing leapt out.

I guess you should make 0666 (or whatever) perms for /dev/passX to write
something by cdrecord/cdrdao

--=20
Vladimir B. Grebenchikov
vova@fbsd.ru



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1097839388.1049.24.camel>