Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:22:47 +0100 From: Davide D'Amico <davide.damico@contactlab.com> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreBSD 9.1 and ZFS v28 performances Message-ID: <51482E67.8060900@contactlab.com> In-Reply-To: <0D88348E154D43E58597FF40BA41D22F@multiplay.co.uk> References: <514729BD.2000608@contactlab.com> <810E5C08C2D149DBAC94E30678234995@multiplay.co.uk> <51473D1D.3050306@contactlab.com> <1DD6360145924BE0ABF2D0979287F5F4@multiplay.co.uk> <51474F2F.5040003@contactlab.com> <E106A7DB08744581A08C610BD8A86560@multiplay.co.uk> <51475267.1050204@contactlab.com> <514757DD.9030705@contactlab.com> <42B9D942BA134E16AFDDB564858CA007@multiplay.co.uk> <1bfdea0efb95a7e06554dadf703d58e7@sys.tomatointeractive.it> <897DB64CEBAF4F04AE9C76B3F686E497@multiplay.co.uk> <13317bbd289c4c828f134e2c2592a2d7@sys.tomatointeractive.it> <A3E2B710EF8342CCAF963106E3E747FB@multiplay.co.uk> <01576f39e05f96ab3b3c822531e0c286@sys.tomatointeractive.it> <0D88348E154D43E58597FF40BA41D22F@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Il 19/03/13 10:18, Steven Hartland ha scritto: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Davide D'Amico" > <davide.damico@contactlab.com> > To: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> > Cc: <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 7:12 AM > Subject: Re: FreBSD 9.1 and ZFS v28 performances > > >> [...] >>> I'd recommend doing the same test on the SSD with ZFS as well as that >>> would >>> give you a simple like for like comparison. >> >> Here we are: >> >> # zpool create DATAZFS mfid2 >> >> 1° round: >> General statistics: >> total time: 90.1662s >> total number of events: 1 >> total time taken by event execution: 90.1631s >> >> 2° round: >> General statistics: >> total time: 82.3333s >> total number of events: 1 >> total time taken by event execution: 82.3307s >> >> 3° round: >> General statistics: >> total time: 81.5421s >> total number of events: 1 >> total time taken by event execution: 81.5399s >> >> 4° round: >> General statistics: >> total time: 82.1657s >> total number of events: 1 >> total time taken by event execution: 82.1636s >> >> >> # zfs get all DATAZFS >> NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE >> DATAZFS type filesystem - >> DATAZFS creation Tue Mar 19 7:36 2013 - >> DATAZFS used 52.0G - >> DATAZFS available 64.2G - >> DATAZFS referenced 52.0G - >> DATAZFS compressratio 1.00x - >> DATAZFS mounted yes - >> DATAZFS quota none default >> DATAZFS reservation none default >> DATAZFS recordsize 128K default >> DATAZFS mountpoint /DATAZFS default >> DATAZFS sharenfs off default >> DATAZFS checksum on default >> DATAZFS compression off default >> DATAZFS atime off local >> DATAZFS devices on default >> DATAZFS exec on default >> DATAZFS setuid on default >> DATAZFS readonly off default >> DATAZFS jailed off default >> DATAZFS snapdir hidden default >> DATAZFS aclmode discard default >> DATAZFS aclinherit restricted default >> DATAZFS canmount on default >> DATAZFS xattr off temporary >> DATAZFS copies 1 default >> DATAZFS version 5 - >> DATAZFS utf8only off - >> DATAZFS normalization none - >> DATAZFS casesensitivity sensitive - >> DATAZFS vscan off default >> DATAZFS nbmand off default >> DATAZFS sharesmb off default >> DATAZFS refquota none default >> DATAZFS refreservation none default >> DATAZFS primarycache all default >> DATAZFS secondarycache all default >> DATAZFS usedbysnapshots 0 - >> DATAZFS usedbydataset 52.0G - >> DATAZFS usedbychildren 225K - >> DATAZFS usedbyrefreservation 0 - >> DATAZFS logbias latency default >> DATAZFS dedup off default >> DATAZFS mlslabel - >> DATAZFS sync standard default >> DATAZFS refcompressratio 1.00x - >> DATAZFS written 52.0G - > > That's got the wrong record size for mysql :( Sorry, my fault (I've made so many tests...). I'll modify it asap, copy the mysql/* files again and posting here the results. Thanks, d.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51482E67.8060900>