Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 18:35:22 -0700 From: David Greenman <dg@root.com> To: William Maddox <maddox@p-1.eng.sun.com> Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for Symbios vs. Adaptect SCSI Message-ID: <199905270135.SAA04503@implode.root.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 May 1999 18:17:51 PDT." <Pine.GSO.3.96.990526180750.5524C-100000@p-1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >You recently made the following remark on freebsd-hardware: > >> The Adaptec chips are generally better supported in >> FreeBSD and I wouldn't consider anything else for systems that I build. >> >> -DG >> >> David Greenman >> Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org >> Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com > >Could you elaborate on what you mean by "better supported"? > >Do you mean: > > 1) Has fewer bugs? > 2) Makes better use of the hardware capabilities? > 3) Has a maintainer who is willing/able to devote > more time to the task? "Yes". Anything further on this needs to come from Justin Gibbs. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905270135.SAA04503>