From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 11 22:46:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787DE1065670 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EE58FC0C for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie19 with SMTP id 19so6356676yie.13 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:46:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:date:to:cc :subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=ZPQrTMEM55YpGnGgRbxNbe3nb0MPds1oN+soA824H+w=; b=KnCTfvwXR/eLZICqc9vKk5Hu7FZGiEZ0EgO6ObC+B+nooGGvDIBlTZlWYErQOpZv9H V+p6cJMUgT4PJ701q508Jz8ADyhQV7QFDU9caBqpk+n/ug25EdywSg7iKDqMA96hcXep WFy9dfb4BqOI2VkzTWv/G9EKpMaxpmdE6oZyk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=USkzG+ZjR6VM5EPGalhTvtydBihMabfZvr0IKR4i3kmajCALNCWh1q4D+GbgsZ+W9z 8QgC5WlCc4m/X9FDaIyQoOkf8lIH4TxjQsG4lhlYRU8UYODd54g7SDmXmPjzp7hfHmny 5AVYYfSnCMTis/8GcR9XY6Hk+IwQ96wRCum2g= Received: by 10.91.196.17 with SMTP id y17mr764727agp.207.1294785963280; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pyunyh@gmail.com ([174.35.1.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w4sm31777960anw.16.2011.01.11.14.46.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:46:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by pyunyh@gmail.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:45:26 -0800 From: Pyun YongHyeon Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:45:26 -0800 To: Lev Serebryakov Message-ID: <20110111224526.GD6278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> References: <1512738982.20110111124729@serebryakov.spb.ru> <20110111200007.GC6278@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <149076940.20110112003110@serebryakov.spb.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <149076940.20110112003110@serebryakov.spb.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Juniper e3k with ports limitied to 100Mbit and re NICs on MSI MoBo: problems with duplex negotiation (Hetzner host provider discard FreeBSD support due this bug) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 22:46:04 -0000 On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:31:10AM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Pyun. > You wrote 11 января 2011 г., 23:00:07: > > > rgephy(4) currently always use auto-negotiation to work-around link > > establishment issues reported in past. > I think, it is the root of the problem. Autonegotiation is DISABLED on > these ports. I think, some additional mediaopt (like > force-half-duplex) for rgephy(4) will be solution. > > > For your case, the only way to address the issue at this moment is > > to use auto-negotiation but that would establish 1000baseT link > > which would add cost for you. Alternatively request half-duplex > > configuration to the provider to get a agreed link duplex. > Maybe, adding new mediaopt is not very hard? Or is it? > That had been supported for long time. Just remove full-duplex media option in your manual configuration.