From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 30 09:35:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B141C106567B for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D90F8FC12 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p2U9ZIp4034521; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:35:18 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:35:18 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Marcin Wisnicki In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20110330195614.P33521@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <201103280614.p2S6EKUC032325@freefall.freebsd.org> <20110328064454.GA63583@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20110328173822.J33521@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/155927: [ipfw] ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:35:20 -0000 On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:51:06 +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > > > On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 06:14:20AM +0000, linimon@freebsd.org wrote: > > > > Old Synopsis: Ipfw stops to check bags for compliance with the > > > > rules, letting everything Rules New Synopsis: [ipfw] ipfw stops to > > > > check bags for compliance with the rules, letting everything Rules > > > > > > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-standards->freebsd-ipfw > > > > Responsible-Changed-By: linimon > > > > Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 28 06:13:10 UTC 2011 > > > > Responsible-Changed-Why: > > > > reclassify, although I do not think there is enough information > > > > here to proceed. > > > > > > interesting use of the term 'bag' for 'packet'! > > > > Even with that cleared up, I can't make out what it may have to do with > > syslogging .. perhaps one of our Russian speakers could intermediate? > > > > I think it means that if newsyslog rotates /var/log/security then ipfw > warnings are not logged anymore ;) I've tried imagining how that could happen, without success - unless /var/log/security somehow wasn't truncated by newsyslog on rotation? % grep security /etc/*syslog.conf /etc/syslog.conf:security.* /var/log/security /etc/newsyslog.conf:/var/log/security 640 21 500 * J > I haven't seen such behaviour myself and that file is handled by syslog > just like many others. +1. Smells a bit like permissions .. from thousands of miles away :) cheers, Ian