Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:53:27 -0400 From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/djvulibre Makefile ports/textproc/wordnet Makefile Message-ID: <200507151653.27864.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20050715101202.2wq41y9xwk48swsg@netchild.homeip.net> References: <200507132352.j6DNqtUS011697@repoman.freebsd.org> <200507141330.03721.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050715101202.2wq41y9xwk48swsg@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Π'ΡΤΞΙΓΡ 15 ΜΙΠΕΞΨ 2005 04:12, Alexander Leidinger χΙ ΞΑΠΙΣΑΜΙ: > Not that someone things we don't need to bump the PORTREVISION when we do > it this way: we still need to bump it, else the cluster will not produce > packages with executables which are linked to the new library (the compiler > adds a reference to a specific version, not to the generic libXXX.so). I'm not talking about packages (a.k.a. RPMs). I'm talking about ports. Port-building by our users... That said, Michael is right -- package-building has enough information about port changes so as not to require PORTVERSION bumps, when the stuff they depend on changes. You are right, that it is still a formal requirement. But that's for a separate thread. -mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507151653.27864.mi%2Bmx>