From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 21 12:55:07 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id MAA15481 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 12:55:07 -0800 Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA15471 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 12:55:00 -0800 Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <1143>; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 13:06:19 -0800 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 1995 13:06:06 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Garrett Wollman cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "route" crashes kernel... In-Reply-To: <9502212007.AA06058@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 21 Feb 1995, Garrett Wollman wrote: > `-link sl0' doesn't make much sense as a destination. Perhaps you > meant to say: > > route add -inet 198.53.215.253 -interface ip-address-of-sl0 > > which would mean that the other end of sl0 has an alias address. Well, that does work, but I was hoping it could be done the Netblazer/KA9Q way where you can directly specify the interface in the route and where most if not all of the interfaces have the same IP address. I notice that ifconfig can make a route like this... Tom