From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 28 17:01:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AC716A420 for ; Sat, 28 May 2005 17:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096AC43F3D for ; Sat, 28 May 2005 16:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: from sentinel (195.198.193.104) by pne-smtpout2-sn1.fre.skanova.net (7.2.059.6) id 42930AA9000F3C7D for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 18:46:30 +0200 From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:46:09 +0200 Organization: Home Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcVjje7t9/TFPhyGQFe/PhwTrbhLgQAFYoMg In-Reply-To: <20050528144411.F727@fledge.watson.org> Subject: MPSAFE CAM? (was: RE: Remaining system calls to make MPSAFE -- NTP, VFS, AIO, linux/etc) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 17:01:04 -0000 I'm sorry to hijack your thread Robert, but I just wanted to hear if there is any progress in making CAM (and the individual card drivers) MPSAFE? FreeBSD is mainly used for servers, where SCSI is pretty common. To me it seems like locking down CAM would be beneficial to a large number of FreeBSD users. I don't have the knowledge or time to do any real work on this myself, but I should be able to help test patches. /Daniel Eriksson