Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Aug 2003 22:49:33 +0200
From:      "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@sitetronics.com>
To:        "'Kris Kennaway'" <kris@obsecurity.org>, "'Jacques A. Vidrine'" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>, "'Jason Stone'" <freebsd-security@dfmm.org>, <security@freebsd.org>, <kris@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   RE: realpath(3) et al
Message-ID:  <000e01c36113$3c6f8400$9f8d2ed5@internal>
In-Reply-To: <20030812204804.GC49087@rot13.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If you guys are too busy for maintaining this port, shall I take on this
burden?

--Devon

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Kris Kennaway [mailto:kris@obsecurity.org]
> Verzonden: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 10:48 PM
> Aan: Jacques A. Vidrine; Devon H. O'Dell; 'Jason Stone';
> security@freebsd.org; kris@FreeBSD.org
> Onderwerp: Re: realpath(3) et al
>=20
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 02:59:46PM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> > > In any case, IBM has a stack smashing protection patch for GCC 3.3 =
on
> > > FreeBSD 4.8 available at
> > > http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/buildfreebsd.html =
(the
> > > description page is at =
http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/).
> It
> > > currently works in the latest cvsupped source from 5.1 as well =
(I've
> built
> > > and tested it).
> >
> > http://www.research.ibm.com/trl/projects/security/ssp/ has the =
latest.
> > Yes, I'd like to see this in the base system as well.  Our toolchain
> > in 5.x is calming down a bit, maybe the timing is getting ripe.
> >
> > I thought Kris looked into this before, but I don't recall what =
might
> > have ultimately stopped him from making the commits. cc:ing him in
> > case he has insight to share.
>=20
> The gcc maintainer (David O'Brien at the time) was unwilling to
> support the burden of an external gcc patch which would need to be
> re-integrated by him each time a new gcc version was imported.
>=20
> Instead, we agreed that the best solution was to make a port that uses
> this patch, which can be updated periodically as the SSP authors track
> new gcc releases.  Neither of us followed through on this though.
>=20
> Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000e01c36113$3c6f8400$9f8d2ed5>