From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 06:29:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C0CD0177D for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BF81D1C for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BEF3AD0177B; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2E3D01779; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A221B1D1A; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id EFD452844; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:19 +0000 (UTC) To: bapt@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Cc: arch@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> Message-Id: <20170307062919.EFD452844@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:19 +0000 (UTC) From: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 06:29:20 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin writes: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first > and maybe instead of in long term. > > The reason is: > - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > /usr/share/man > - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to patch > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. Can you also move /usr/local/info to /usr/local/share/info? texinfo is gone since 11.0-RELEASE (or r276551) but hier(7) and BSD.usr.dist still try to encroach on GNU defaults.