From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Jul 19 07:55:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783FFBBFAA; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FB018B265; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:55:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 283C3116DF; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:55:36 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Brooks Davis Cc: Piotr Kubaj , Piotr Kubaj , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r506850 - head/databases/mysql-connector-odbc Message-ID: <20190719075536.GA15828@FreeBSD.org> References: <201907181130.x6IBU0lF065180@repo.freebsd.org> <20190718120720.GB59568@FreeBSD.org> <20190718121709.GA38485@ThinkPad-X200.g.anongoth.pl> <20190718124236.GA96440@FreeBSD.org> <20190718174824.GB16600@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190718174824.GB16600@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FB018B265 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.95 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.952,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:2610:1c1:1::/48, country:US] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:55:36 -0000 On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:48:24PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:42:36PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 02:17:09PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > > Ah, I didn't know it existed. > > > > > > But C++0x is still the same as C++11... > > > > *sigh* > > > > Yes, their effect is the same (both would pull the same compiler), > > but it gives the reader false impression that the code is C++11 while > > it's C++0x. > > C++11 is literally the-standard-formerly-known-as-C++0x. To the extent > that there are deviations, it's because the compiler is referring to > some (probably unstated and inconsistent) draft. While I agree that C++11 is essentially a gold-release version of C++0x, I was trying to make a larger point here, that is, do not blindly use `c++11-lang' or `c11' whenever a modern compiler is required and try to do something more appropriate in each particular case. ./danfe